DOCSLIB.ORG

Muhâsebe-I Vilâyet-I Rûm-Ili Defteri Ile Icmâl Defterleri I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Muhâsebe-I Vilâyet-I Rûm-Ili Defteri Ile Icmâl Defterleri I T.C. BAŞBAKANLIK DEVLET ARŞİVLERİ GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanlığı Yayın Nu: Defter-i Hâkânî Dizisi: XI 367 NUMARALI MUHÂSEBE-İ VİLÂYET-İ RÛM-İLİ DEFTERİ İLE 101, 114 ve 390 NUMARALI İCMÂL DEFTERLERİ ( 920-937 / 1514-1530 ) I Karlı-ili, Agrıboz, Mora, Rodos ve Tırhala Livâları <Dizin> ANKARA - 2007 Proje Yöneticisi Doç. Dr. Yusuf SARINAY Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürü Proje Sorumluları Doç. Dr. Mustafa BUDAK Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdür Yardımcısı Dr. Önder BAYIR Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanı Dr. Ahmet Zeki İZGÖER Yayın İşleri Koordinatörü Yayına Hazırlayanlar Ahmet ÖZKILINÇ Ali COŞKUN Abdullah SİVRİDAĞ Murat YÜZBAŞIOĞLU Baskıya Hazırlama Murat ŞENER Salih DUTOĞLU 367 NUMARALI MUHÂSEBE-İ VİLÂYET-İ RÛM-İLİ DEFTERİ İLE 101, 114 ve 390 NUMARALI İCMÂL DEFTERLERİ ( 920-937 / 1514-1530 ) I Karlı-ili, Agrıboz, Mora, Rodos ve Tırhala Livâları <Dizin> ÖNSÖZ Osmanlı Devleti, XIII. yüzyılın sonu ile XX. yüzyılın ilk çeyreği arasında geçen zaman diliminde dünyanın katetmiş olduğu bütün siyasî, sosyal, ekonomik, askerî ve kültürel gelişmelerde birinci derecede aktif rol alarak günümüzde insanoğlunun ulaşmış olduğu medeniyet seviyesine büyük katkılar sağlamış nadir devletlerden biridir. Böyle bir devletin hangi ekonomik, sosyal, askerî ve idarî temellere dayandığı konusunu aydınlatmak ülkemiz ve dünya tarih araştırmacılarının en önemli çalışma sahalarından birisi olmuştur. Osmanlı Devleti'nin kuruluş, gelişme ve yükselme dönemlerindeki ekonomik, askerî, idarî, sosyal ve demografik yapısının aydınlatılmasında sancak esasına göre tutulmuş olan “Defter-i Hakanîler” yani “Tahrir Defterleri”nin önemli bir yeri vardır. Osmanlı Devleti'nin idarî yapısı, ticaret ve sınaî hayatı, tarım ürünleri, hayvancılık, yer altı kaynakları, nüfus ve etnik yapısı ile tüm sosyal ve tarihî eserler hakkında detaylı bilgiler bu defterlerde mevcuttur. Rumeli eyaletine ait TD 167 ve TD 370 numaralı defterler kurumumuz tarafından daha önceki yıllarda 4 kitap halinde yayınlanmıştır. Bölgeye ait 3. defter olan TD 367 numaralı defter de 2 cilt halinde yayınlanacaktır. Hazırlanan 1. ciltte Karlıili, Agrıboz, Mora, Rodos ve Tırhala sancakları yer almaktadır. Defterde Mora ve Tırhala sancaklarının bir bölümü eksiktir. Bu eksikliği tamamlamak için Mora için TD 367'ye ilave olarak TD 114 ve TD 390, Tırhala için de TD 101 numaralı defter hazırlanmıştır. 2007'de hazırlanacak 2. ciltte ise Yanya, İskenderiye, Ohri ve İlbasan sancakları ile Dukakin vilayeti bulunmaktadır. Bu defterde olması gereken, fakat değişik sebeplerle bugün elimizde bulunmayan Avlonya sancağı bölümü için TD 94 ve TD 1078 numaralı defterler yayınlanacaktır. Kurumumuz, şimdiye kadar yapmış olduğu yayın çalışmalarında, hem arşiv belgelerinin tanıtımını hem de tarihî olaylara objektif bakma imkânı sağlayan kaynaklardan yararlanmayı kolaylaştırmayı hedeflemiş ve bu amaçlar doğrultusunda belirlenen yayın politikasının sonucu olarak 1992-2007 yılları arasında hazırladığı 80 civarındaki eseri ilim çevrelerinin hizmetine sunmuştur. Bu çerçevede, eseri hazırlayan Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürlüğü Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanlığı personelini tebrik eder, çalışmanın ilgililere yararlı olmasını dilerim. Doç. Dr. Yusuf SARINAY Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürü V İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ ................................................................................................................................................................................................ V İÇİNDEKİLER ................................................................................................................................................................................ VII KISALTMALAR ...............................................................................................................................................................................IX I. GİRİŞ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 II. YAYINLANAN ESERDEKİ LİVĀLARA AİT TAHRĪR DEFTERLERİ.............................................................................. 11 A. YARARLANILAN DEFTERLERDEKİ İDĀRĪ BİRİMLER............................................................................................. 11 B. YAYINLANAN ESERDEKİ LİVĀLARA AİT DEFTERLER ........................................................................................... 21 III. YEKUN CETVELLERİ ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 IV. DİZİNLER ................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 A. KARLI-İLİ LİVĀSI ...................................................................................................................................... 49 1. Kişi ve Cemā‘at Adları.........................................................................................................................................49 2. Yer Adları.............................................................................................................................................................50 3. Terimler................................................................................................................................................................56 B. AGRIBOZ LİVĀSI ....................................................................................................................................... 58 1. Kişi ve Cemā‘at Adları.........................................................................................................................................58 2. Yer Adları.............................................................................................................................................................60 3. Terimler................................................................................................................................................................71 C. MORA LİVĀSI ............................................................................................................................................ 76 1. Kişi ve Cemā‘at Adları.........................................................................................................................................76 2. Yer Adları...........................................................................................................................................................101 3. Terimler..............................................................................................................................................................144 D. RODOS LİVĀSI ......................................................................................................................................... 156 1. Kişi ve Cemā‘at Adları.......................................................................................................................................156 2. Yer Adları...........................................................................................................................................................157 3. Terimler..............................................................................................................................................................161 E. TIRHALA LİVĀSI...................................................................................................................................... 164 1. Kişi ve Cemā‘at Adları.......................................................................................................................................164 2. Yer Adları...........................................................................................................................................................174 3. Terimler..............................................................................................................................................................196 V. HARİTALAR.................................................................................................................................................. 203 1. Karlı-ili, Agrıboz, Mora, Rodos ve Tırhala Livāları İdārī Birimleri.......................................................................205 2. Karlı-ili Livāsı.........................................................................................................................................................206 3. Agrıboz Livāsı.........................................................................................................................................................207 4. Mora Livāsı Mizistre, Arkadya, Koron, Moton ve Kalamata Kazāları...................................................................208 VII 5. Mora Livāsı Hulumiç, Balya-badra ve Kalavrita Kazāları ..................................................................................... 209 6. Mora Livāsı Karitena Kazāsı.................................................................................................................................. 210 7. Mora Livāsı Koritos ve Arhos Kazāları.................................................................................................................. 211 8. Rodos Livāsı Rodos Kazāsı...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teşkilat Ve Đşleyiş Bakımından Doğu Hududundaki Osmanlı Kaleleri Ve
    Teşkilat ve Đşleyiş Bakımından Doğu Hududundaki Osmanlı Kaleleri ve Mevâcib Defterleri The Ottoman Castles in Eastern Border of in Terms of Organization and Operation and Mevacib Defters Orhan Kılıç * Özet Bir çeşit askeri sayım niteliğinde olan mevâcib defterleri ulûfe sistemi içinde olan askeri sınıfların tespiti için en önemli arşiv kaynaklarıdır. Bu defterler sayesinde merkez ve merkez dışında görev yapan yevmiyyeli askerlerin mevcudunu, aldıkları ücretleri, isimlerini ve teşkilatlanmalarını tespit etmek mümkündür. Osmanlı coğrafyasının değişik bölgelerindeki hudut kaleleri, iç bölgelerdeki kalelere göre çok daha kalabalık ve askeri sınıfların çeşitliliği bakımından daha da zengin olmuştur. Bu kalelerde kadrolu askerlerinin yanı sıra merkezden görevlendirilen nöbetçi askerler de muhafaza hizmetinde bulunmuşlardır. Bu yapılanma, hudut kalelerinin bulunduğu şehirlerin adeta bir asker şehri görüntüsü vermesine sebep olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Osmanlı, Van, Erzurum, Yeniçeri, Mevâcib, Kale teşkilatı. Abstract Mevacib defters, a type of military counting, are the most important archive sources to determine the military corps in ulufe. Due to these defter, it is possible to identify the size, payments, names and organizations of the retained soldiers working in and out of center. Border castles in the different parts of the Ottoman geography were more crowded than the inland castles and richer according to the variety of military corps. In these castles, sentries assigned from the center gave maintenance service as well as permanent soldiers. This settlement made the cities in which these castles exist have an appearance of a military city. Keywords: Ottoman, Van, Erzurum, Mevâcib, Janissary, Castle organization. * Prof. Dr., Fırat Üniversitesi Đnsani ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü Elazığ/TÜRKĐYE. [email protected] 88 ORHAN KILIÇ Osmanlı askeri sistemi iki temel unsurun üzerine bina edilmişti.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reign of Violence
    CHAPTER THIRTEEN THE REIGN OF VIOLENCE The celalis c. I 5 50-I 700 --.... -- Oktay Ozel odern historiography depicts Ottoman history in the late sixteenth and early M seventeenth centuries as a period of crisis, generally associated with the eelali rebellions which occurred primarily in Anatolia and, to a lesser extent, northern Syria. l Discussion of eelali causes has centred largely around sixteenth-century political­ fiscal and economic-demographic developments. Recently added to the argument has been the agency problem of the predatory state, the nature of the overall transforma­ tion that the empire and society experienced in parallel with the eelali movements throughout the seventeenth century, and climatic changes. The present essay reassesses the issue in the light of new findings based on recently explored sources. It examines internal demographic, economic and political dynamics and conditions, as well as conjunctural factors in the I 590S which led marginalized groups within rural society, primarily the peasant masses, into a violent reaction in the form of banditry and rebel­ lion. A reconstruction of the historical context and causes is followed by discussion of the destructive character of [he eelali movements and its consequences in Anatolia, and of the nature of this violence as a phenomenon within Ottoman social history. The central argument of the essay is that the political-level analysis of the eelalis falls far short in understanding both the peculiarities of the historical process which prepared the ground for the eelali movements and [he extent of destructive violence throughout the seventeenth century. Banditry and occasional rebellions continued, transforming rural society, the economy and the ecological environment as well as leaving a legacy of institutionalized violence which became an inherent characteristic oflater Ottoman Anatolian society.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICIZING the OTTOMAN TIMAR SYSTEM: IDENTITIES of TIMAR-HOLDERS, 14TH to 17TH CENTURIES LINDA T. DARLING University of Arizo
    Historicizing the Ottoman Timar System: Identities of Timar-Holders, Fourteenth to Seventeenth Centuries Item Type Article Authors Darling, Linda T. Citation Historicizing the Ottoman System: Identities of -Holders, Fourteenth to Seventeenth Centuries Darling, Linda T., Turkish Historical Review, 8, 145-173 (2017), DOI:https:// doi.org/10.1163/18775462-00802001 DOI 10.1163/18775462-00802001 Publisher BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS Journal TURKISH HISTORICAL REVIEW Rights Copyright © 2017, Brill. Download date 27/09/2021 18:51:57 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final accepted manuscript Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/628212 HISTORICIZING THE OTTOMAN TIMAR SYSTEM: IDENTITIES OF TIMAR-HOLDERS, 14TH TO 17TH CENTURIES LINDA T. DARLING University of Arizona [email protected] revised August 2017 13,022 words Abstract: This article aims to develop a new narrative of changes in the Ottoman timar system independent of the complaints of decline brought by advice writers like Mustafa ‘Ali. Based on the icmal defterleri, it examines the identities of timar-holders and their changes over time, a topic generally ignored in descriptions of the Ottoman military. It connects changes in timar-holding with changing conditions in the sultans’ reigns. It then takes a longer-term look at these changes over the half-centuries and finds the well-known complaints in the nasihatnameler to be based on a very short-term view of the system. Keywords: Ottoman Empire; timar system; sipahi; icmal; muhimme; nasihat; ecnebi;
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Gunpowder Empire and the Composite Bow Nathan Lanan Gettysburg College Class of 2012
    Volume 9 Article 4 2010 The Ottoman Gunpowder Empire and the Composite Bow Nathan Lanan Gettysburg College Class of 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj Part of the Islamic World and Near East History Commons, and the Military History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Lanan, Nathan (2010) "The Ottoman Gunpowder Empire and the Composite Bow," The Gettysburg Historical Journal: Vol. 9 , Article 4. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol9/iss1/4 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ottoman Gunpowder Empire and the Composite Bow Abstract The Ottoman Empire is known today as a major Gunpowder Empire, famous for its prevalent use of this staple of modern warfare as early as the sixteenth century. However, when Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq visited Constantinople from 1554 to 1562, gunpowder was not used by the Sipahi cavalry who stubbornly, it seems, insisted on continuing to use the composite bow that the Turks had been using for centuries. This continued, despite their fear of European cavalry who used “small muskets” against them on raids. Was this a good idea? Was the composite bow a match or contemporary handheld firearms? Were Turkish tactics incompatible with firearms to the point that the Ottomans would have lost their effectiveness on the battlefield? Could the
    [Show full text]
  • Wallachia 20 Exclusive Rules TABLE of CONTENTS
    Wallachia 20 Exclusive Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS Rousse 20 Slobozia 20 [1.0] Introduction . 2 [1.0] Introduction . 7 [2.0] Game Equipment ������������2 [2.0] Game Equipment ������������7 [3.0] Setting Up The Game . 3 [3.0] Setting Up The Game . 8 [4.0] Sequence Of Play ������������4 [4.0] Sequence Of Play ��������� 10 [5.0] Random Events . 4 [5.0] Random Events . 11 [6.0] Movement . 4 [6.0] Movement . 11 [9.0] Combat . 4 [9.0] Combat . 11 [11.0] Reinforcements . 5 [14.0] Night Turns . 14 [14.0] Night Turns . 5 [15.0] How To Win ��������������� 14 [15.0] How To Win ������������������5 [16.0] Optional Rules ����������� 14 [16.0] Optional Rules ��������������6 [17.0] The Wallachian Campaign . 16 Designer’s Notes ��������������������� 18 [0.0] Exclusive Rules This is the Exclusive Rules book forWallachia 20, which includes the following games: Rousse 20 – Battle on the Edge of a Scimitar Slobozia 20 – Trap, Talk, and Truce These games also use theNapoleonic 20 Standard Rules. When combined, these two documents form the entirety of the rules needed to play these games. These Exclusive Rules supersede the Standard Rules when there is a conflict. Wallachia 20 Exclusive Rules v0.1 Wallachia 20 Exclusive Rules v0.1 Rousse 20: Battle on the Edge of a Scimitar [1.0] Introduction Rousse 20 simulates the earlier of the two major battles of the Russo-Turkish war of 1806- 1812, both fought on the Bulgarian-Romanian frontier near the fortified town of Rousse. One player leads the Russian Army under the command of General-in-Chief Kutuzov, while the other player commands the Ottoman army under Grand Vizier Ahmed Pasha.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Macedonia (Late 14Th – Late 17Th Century)
    VI. Ottoman Macedonia (late 14th – late 17th century) by Phokion Kotzageorgis 1. The Ottoman conquest The Ottoman period in Macedonia begins with the region’s conquest in the late 14th cen- tury.1 The Ottoman victory against the combined Serb forces at Çirmen in Evros in 1371 was the turning point that permitted the victors to proceed with ease towards the west and, around a decade later, to cross the river Nestos and enter the geographic region of Mace- donia. 1383 marked their first great victory in Macedonia, the fall of the important administrative centre of Serres.2 By the end of the century all the strategically important Macedonian cities had been occupied (Veroia, Monastir, Vodena, Thessaloniki).3 The process by which the city of Thessaloniki was captured was somewhat different than for the others: it was initially given to the Ottomans in 1387 – after a siege of four years – and re- mained autonomous for a period. In 1394 it was fully incorporated into the Ottoman state, only to return to Byzantine hands in 1403 with the agreement they made with the Otto- mans, drawn up after the (temporary) collapse of the Ottoman state.4 In 1423 the Byzantine governor of the city, Andronikos Palaiologos, handed it over to the Venetians, and the en- suing Venetian period in Thessaloniki lasted for seven years. On 29 March 1430, the Ottoman regiments under Murad II raided and occupied the city, incorporating it fully into their state.5 Ioannis Anagnostis, eyewitness to Thessaloniki’s fall, described the moment at which the Ottomans entered the city:6 Because in those parts they found a number of our people, pluckier than the others and with large stones, they threw them down, along with the stairways, and killed many of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Suleiman?
    NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 9th Grade Suleiman Inquiry How “Magnificent” Was Suleiman? Titian, painting of Suleiman, c1530 ©World History Archive/Newscom Supporting Questions 1. How was Suleiman characterized during his reign? 2. How did Suleiman expand the Ottoman Empire? 3. What changes did Suleiman make to the governance of the Ottoman Empire? 4. To what extent did Suleiman promote tolerance in the Ottoman Empire? THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION- NONCOMMERCIAL- SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE. 1 NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 9th Grade Suleiman Inquiry How “Magnificent” Was Suleiman? 9.7 OTTOMANS AND MING PRE-1600: Christianity, Islam, and Neo-Confucianism influenced the New York State development of regions and shaped key centers of power in the world between 1368 and 1683. The Social Studies Ottoman Empire and Ming Dynasty were two powerful states, each with a view of itself and its place in the Framework Key world. Idea & Practices Gathering, Using, and Interpreting Evidence Comparison and Contextualization Staging the Students read an excerpt from the National Geographic (2014) article “After 450 Years, Archaeologists Still Question Hunting for Magnificent Sultan’s Heart.” Discuss what reasons might explain the fascination with finding Suleiman’s remains. Supporting Question 1 Supporting Question 2 Supporting Question 3 Supporting Question 4 How was Suleiman How did Suleiman expand What changes did Suleiman To what extent did Suleiman characterized during his the
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Janissary in Eighteenth- Century Istanbul
    THE URBAN JANISSARY IN EIGHTEENTH- CENTURY ISTANBUL By GEMMA MASSON A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman And Modern Greek Studies School of History and Cultures University of Birmingham July 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. i Abstract The traditional narrative of Ottoman history claims that the Empire went into decline from the seventeenth century onwards, with the eighteenth century being a period of upheaval and change which led to the eventual fall of the Ottomans. The janissaries are major players in these narratives with claims from both secondary and primary writers that this elite military corps became corrupt and this contributed significantly to the overall decline of the Ottoman Empire. Such a simplistic view overlooks the changes taking place in the environment surrounding the janissaries leading to members of the corps needing to adapt to changing circumstances. The result is that the janissaries of this period were for the longest time almost exclusively studied through a binary ‘purity/corruption’ paradigm and it became difficult for scholars to move away from this system of thinking about the corps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Sultan Süleyman: a Study of Process/Es of Image-Making and Reputation Management
    THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT by NEV ĐN ZEYNEP YELÇE Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Sabancı University June, 2009 © Nevin Zeynep Yelçe 2009 All Rights Reserved To My Dear Parents Ay şegül and Özer Yelçe ABSTRACT THE MAKING OF SULTAN SÜLEYMAN: A STUDY OF PROCESS/ES OF IMAGE-MAKING AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT Yelçe, Nevin Zeynep Ph.D., History Supervisor: Metin Kunt June 2009, xv+558 pages This dissertation is a study of the processes involved in the making of Sultan Süleyman’s image and reputation within the two decades preceding and following his accession, delineating the various phases and aspects involved in the making of the multi-layered image of the Sultan. Handling these processes within the framework of Sultan Süleyman’s deeds and choices, the main argument of this study is that the reputation of Sultan Süleyman in the 1520s was the result of the convergence of his actions and his projected image. In the course of this study, main events of the first ten years of Sultan Süleyman’s reign are conceptualized in order to understand the elements employed first in making a Sultan out of a Prince, then in maintaining and enhancing the sultanic image and authority. As such, this dissertation examines the rhetorical, ceremonial, and symbolic devices which came together to build up a public image for the Sultan. Contextualized within a larger framework in terms of both time and space, not only the meaning and role of each device but the way they are combined to create an image becomes clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Black Sea Frontier and the Relations of the Porte with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Muscovy, 1 6 2 2 -1 6 2 8
    Order Number 9013246 The Ottoman Black Sea frontier and the relations of the Porte with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Muscovy, 1 6 2 2 -1 6 2 8 Ostapchuk, Victor, Ph.D. Harvard University, 1989 Copyright ©1990 by Ostapchuk, Victor. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. HARVARD UNIVERSITY THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND'' SCIENCES THESIS ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE (To be placed in Original Copy) The undersigned, appointed by the Division Department \ Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies have examined a thesis entitled The Ottoman Black Sea Frontier and the Relations of the Porte with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Muscovy, 1622-1628 presented by V ictor Ostapchuk candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and hereby certify that it is worthy of acceptance. Signature ... Typed name ..P.fflel,i an Pritsak!' Signature .................. Typed name . Edward.J,,....Keegan. Signature ... Typed name Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The Ottoman Black Sea Frontier and the Relations of the Porte with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Muscovy, 1622-1628 A thesis presented Victor Ostapchuk to The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Inner Asian and Aludc Studies Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts October, 1989 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vratislav Zervan Die Lehnwörter Im Wortschatz Der Spätbyzantinischen Historiographischen Literatur Byzantinisches Archiv
    Vratislav Zervan Die Lehnwörter im Wortschatz der spätbyzantinischen historiographischen Literatur Byzantinisches Archiv Begründet von Karl Krumbacher Als Ergänzung zur Byzantinischen Zeitschrift herausgegeben von Albrecht Berger Band 34 Vratislav Zervan Die Lehnwörter im Wortschatz der spätbyzantinischen historiographischen Literatur unter Mitarbeit von Johannes Kramer, Claudia Römer, Michael Metzeltin, Bojana Pavlović und Andrea Massimo Cuomo Veröffentlicht mit der Unterstützung des Austrian Science Fund (FWF): PUB 517-Z25 ISBN 978-3-11-058538-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-058767-8 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-058545-2 Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lizenz. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952435 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. © 2019 Vratislav Zervan, publiziert von Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Satz: Meta Systems Publishing & Printservices GmbH, Wustermark Druck und Bindung: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Vorwort Die vorliegende Studie ist das Resultat der FWF-Projekte P 23912-G19 „Imitation/ Innovation im Wortschatz der spätbyzantinischen historiographischen Literatur“ (Hauptmitarbeiter: Andrea Cuomo) und P 24289 „Die Kirchengeschichte des Nike- phoros Xanthopulos: Chrysostomos bis Phokas“
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Age of Exploration
    the ottoman age of exploration the Ottomanof explorationAge Giancarlo Casale 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dares Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Casale, Giancarlo. Th e Ottoman age of exploration / Giancarlo Casale. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-537782-8 1. Turkey—History—16th century. 2. Indian Ocean Region—Discovery and exploration—Turkish. 3. Turkey—Commerce—History—16th century. 4. Navigation—Turkey—History—16th century. I. Title. DR507.C37 2010 910.9182'409031—dc22 2009019822 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper for my several
    [Show full text]