DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents Arizona Collecting Sites Arizona Site Locator Map Map Legend Forward 9 Summary of Basic Rockhounding Rules & Regulations 10 Introduction 12 Mineral Highlights 12 Mining in Arizona 15 Mineral and Gem Collecting in Arizona 17 More Than Just Pretty Rocks 20 Region I Site 1 Lake Powell 22 Site 2 Kingman Onyx 24 Site 3 Chloride Minerals 26 Site 4 Oatman Fire Agate 28 SiteS Wenden Dendritic Agate 30 Site 6 Alamo Lake Palm Bog 32 Site 7 Signal Petrified Wood 34 Site 8 Desert Roses 36 Site 9 Burro Creek Opalite 38 Site 10 Burro Creek Pastelite 40 Site 11 Burro Creek Apache Tears 42 Site 12 Date Creek Quartz Crystals 44 Site 13 Bagdad Agate & Jasper 46 Site 14 Perkinsville Agate 48 Site 15 Prescott Minerals 50 Site 16 Copper Basin Minerals 52 Site 17 Rock Butte Fossils 54 Site 18 Crookton Road Onyx 56 Site 19 Ash Fork Picture Stone 58 Site 20 Crown King Minerals 60 Region II Site 21 Parks Obsidian 62 Site 22 Country Club Fossils 64 Site 23 Jerome Calcite 66 Site 24 Hull Canyon Fossils & Calcite 70 Site 25 Perkinsville Road Fossils 72 Site 26 Cottonwood Minerals 74 Site 27 Mogollon Rim Fossils 76 Site 28 Fossils From Pine 78 Site 29 Camp Verde Area Minerals 80 Site 30 East Verde Fossils 82 Site 31 Payson Agate 84 Site 32 Horton Petrified Coral 86 Site 33 Roberts Mesa Fossils and Chert 88 Site 34 Forest Lakes Fossils 90 Site 35 Black Canyon Red Jasper 92 Site 36 Houston Mesa Coral 94 Tumble Polishing Rocks 96 & 105 Color Photo Insert 97 Site 37 Payson Geodes & Nodules 106 Site 38 Christopher Creek Jasper 108 Site 39 Rim Road Fossils 110 Site 40 Perley Creek Fossils 112 Site 41 Blue Ridge Reservoir 114 Site 42 Woodruff Petrified Wood 116 Site 43 Joseph City Petrified Wood 118 Site 44 Winslow Petrified Wood 120 Region III Site 45 Harquahala Mine Minerals 122 Site 46 Plomosa Mountains 124 Site 47 Brenda Jasper 126 Site 48 Aguila Crystals 128 Site 49 Wenden Marble 130 Site 50 Bouse Hematite & Jasper 132 Site 51 Plomosa Road Minerals 134 Site 52 Moon Mountain Petrified Wood 136 Site 53 Quartzsite Minerals 138 Site 54 Crystal Hill 140 Site 55 Big Horn Mountains Fluorite 142 Site 56 Eagle Tail Mountains 144 Site 57 Little Harquahala Mountains Chalcedony 146 Site 58 Vulture Mine Region 148 Site 59 Painted Rocks Agate & Minerals 150 Site 60 Fourth of July Peak Agate 152 Sice 61 Saddle Mountains Fire Agate 154 Site 62 Ghost Towns & Minerals 156 Site 63 Wickenburg Nodules 158 Site 64 Indian Pass Dumortierite 162 Site 65 Palo Verde Fire Agate 164 Site 66 Red Cloud Mine Area 166 Site 67 Whipple Mountain Chalcedony 168 Site 68 Big River Agate 170 Region IV Site 69 Table Mountain jasper 172 Site 70 Cave Creek Agate & Jasper 174 Site 71 Horseshoe Lake Black Agate 176 Site 72 Sheep Crossing 178 Site 73 Maricopa Green Jasper 180 Site 74 Queen Valley Marble 182 Site 75 Hayden Wulfenite 184 Site 76 Dudleyville Minerals 188 Site 77 Winkelman Fossils 190 Site 78 Copper Country 192 Site 79 Globe Onyx 194 Site 80 Seneca Lake Serpentine 196 Site 81 Black Hills Fire Agate 198 Site 82 Pipeline Road Geodes 200 Site 83 Clifton Fire Agate 202 Site 84 Mule Creek Apache Tears 204 Site 85 Geronimo Trail Geodes 206 Site 86 Carlyle Mine Dumps 208 Site 87 Round Mountain Fire Agate 210 Site 88 Duncan Fire Agate 212 Site 89 Joy Valley Fire Agate 214 Site 90 Granite Gap Fluorescent Minerals 216 Site 91 Gleeson Area Minerals 218 Site 92 Dragoon Marble 220 Site 93 St. David Selenite Clusters 222 Site 94 Highway 90 Fossils 224 Site 95 Carr Canyon Quartz Crystals 226 Site 96 Ash Canyon Crystals 230 Site 97 Providencia Canyon Rhodochrosite 232 Site 98 Patagonia Minerals 236 Site 99 Corral Nuevo Geodes 238 Site 100 Cerro Prieto Wash Marble 240 Site 101 Empire Mountains Travertine 242 Site 102 Helvetia Mining District 244 Site 103 Tucson Fossils 246 Site 104 Saginaw Hill Minerals 248 Appendix A-A Partial List of Annual Arizona Gem Shows 250 Appendix B-Arizona Rockhound and Prospecting Clubs 253 Appendix C-Mineral Museums and Mining Tours 255 Glossary 257 Mineral Locator Index 262.
Recommended publications
  • Department of the Interior U.S

    Department of the Interior U.S

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION 2 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS CONTAMINANTS IN BIGHORN SHEEP ON THE KOFA NATIONAL WIL DLIFE REFUGE, 2000-2001 By Carrie H. Marr, Anthony L. Velasco1, and Ron Kearns2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 August 2004 2 ABSTRACT Soils of abandoned mines on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge (KNWR) are contaminated with arsenic, barium, mercury, manganese, lead, and zinc. Previous studies have shown that trace element and metal concentrations in bats were elevated above threshold concentrations. High trace element and metal concentrations in bats suggested that bighorn sheep also may be exposed to these contaminants when using abandoned mines as resting areas. We found evidence of bighorn sheep use, bighorn sheep carcasses, and scat in several abandoned mines. To determine whether bighorn sheep are exposed to, and are accumulating hazardous levels of metals while using abandoned mines, we collected soil samples, as well as scat and bone samples when available. We compared mine soil concentrations to Arizona non-residential clean up levels. Hazard quotients were elevated in several mines and elevated for manganese in one Sheep Tank Mine sample. We analyzed bighorn sheep tissues for trace elements. We obtained blood, liver, and bone samples from hunter-harvested bighorn in 2000 and 2001. Arizona Game and Fish Department also collected blood from bighorn during a translocation operation in 2001. Iron and magnesium were elevated in tissues compared to reference literature concentrations in other species. Most often, domestic sheep baseline levels were used for comparison because of limited available data for bighorn sheep.
  • GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

    GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

    Volume 50, Number 5 GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA www.geosociety.org/rm-mtg Sunset Crater is a cinder cone located north of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Program 05-RM-cvr.indd 1 2/27/2018 4:17:06 PM Program Joint Meeting Rocky Mountain Section, 70th Meeting Cordilleran Section, 114th Meeting Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 15–17 May 2018 2018 Meeting Committee General Chair . Paul Umhoefer Rocky Mountain Co-Chair . Dennis Newell Technical Program Co-Chairs . Nancy Riggs, Ryan Crow, David Elliott Field Trip Co-Chairs . Mike Smith, Steven Semken Short Courses, Student Volunteer . Lisa Skinner Exhibits, Sponsorship . Stephen Reynolds GSA Rocky Mountain Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Janet Dewey Vice Chair . Kevin Mahan Past Chair . Amy Ellwein Secretary/Treasurer . Shannon Mahan GSA Cordilleran Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Susan Cashman Vice Chair . Michael Wells Past Chair . Kathleen Surpless Secretary/Treasurer . Calvin Barnes Sponors We thank our sponsors below for their generous support. School of Earth and Space Exploration - Arizona State University College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Sciences University of Arizona Geosciences (Arizona LaserChron Laboratory - ALC, Arizona Radiogenic Helium Dating Lab - ARHDL) School of Earth Sciences & Environmental Sustainability - Northern Arizona University Arizona Geological Survey - sponsorship of the banquet Prof . Stephen J Reynolds, author of Exploring Geology, Exploring Earth Science, and Exploring Physical Geography - sponsorship of the banquet NOTICE By registering for this meeting, you have acknowledged that you have read and will comply with the GSA Code of Conduct for Events (full code of conduct listed on page 31) .
  • Animated Tectonic Reconstruction of the Lower Colorado River Region: Implications for Late Miocene to Present Deformation Scott E

    Animated Tectonic Reconstruction of the Lower Colorado River Region: Implications for Late Miocene to Present Deformation Scott E

    Animated tectonic reconstruction of the Lower Colorado River region: implications for Late Miocene to Present deformation Scott E. K. Bennett,1 Michael H. Darin,2 Rebecca J. Dorsey,3 Lisa A. Skinner,2 Paul J. Umhoefer,2 and Michael E. Oskin4 1U.S. Geological Survey, 2Northern Arizona University, 3University of Oregon, 4University of California, Davis Introduction of upper crustal structures that accommodated Although the majority of late Miocene to present intracontinental strain and improves our understanding Pacic–North America plate boundary strain has been of the processes that promoted localized or diuse strain accommodated by faults of the San Andreas and Gulf during reorganization of the Pacic–North America of California systems, growing evidence of dextral shear plate boundary. east of the San Andreas Fault indicates that a component Map-view translations of crustal blocks inuence of plate boundary deformation occurred in the lower the relative motions of adjacent blocks, an approach Colorado River (LoCR) region. Large-scale tectonic adhered to in global plate-circuit models (Atwater and reconstructions across the Gulf of California and Salton Stock, 1998; 2013). us, a synthesis of the magnitude Trough (GCAST) region (Fig. 1), a ~500 km-wide and timing of horizontal strain across a broad zone zone of deformation that aected the western margin of distributed deformation can provide insight into of North America, provide important constraints on processes of strain partitioning and potential kinematic the location, timing, style, and magnitude of crustal links between adjacent structural domains. Furthermore, deformation in the LoCR region (Fig. 2). Characterizing it can help prioritize and guide future work by Miocene to present deformation in the LoCR region identifying gaps in our understanding of plate boundary is important to resolve the presence and kinematics deformation and provide a degree of predictability Figure 1.
  • Of Our Favorite Things

    Of Our Favorite Things

    TALON AGENTS: THE MAJESTIC ARTIST ROBERT SHIELDS: AUGUST 1909: WILDLIFE ECOLOGY BIRDS OF CAVE CREEK CANYON NOPE. HE’S NOT ALL MIME IS BORN IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS AUGUST 2009 ESCAPE. EXPLORE. EXPERIENCE BEST ofAZ of our favorite things 100featuring BRANDON WEBB & ROGER CLYNE plus DIERKS BENTLEY: The Coolest Dude in Country Music and A Pulitzer Winner and a Camera Went Into the Catalinas … contents 08.09 features 14 BEST OF AZ Our first-ever guide to the best of everything in Arizona, from eco-friendly accommodations to secret hide- aways and margaritas. The latter, by the way, come courtesy of Roger Clyne, the Tempe-based rock star. Cy Young Award-winner Brandon Webb pitched in on this piece as well, and so did NFL referee Ed Hochuli. Grand Canyon Some of the choices you’ll agree with. Others, prob - National Park ably not. Either way, this is our take on the “Best of Flagstaff Arizona.” EDITED BY KELLY KRAMER Sedona Springerville 36 A PULITZER WINNER AND A Camp Verde Globe CAMERA WENT INTO THE CATALINAS ... PHOENIX It sounds like a joke, doesn’t it? It’s not. We just wrote departments that to get your attention. When it comes to photography, 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 3 CONTRIBUTORS 4 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Santa Catalina Jack Dykinga is dead serious. That’s why he has a Pulitzer Mountains sitting on his mantel. Or maybe it’s shoved in a drawer — 5 THE JOURNAL www.arizonahighways.com People, places and things from around the state, that’s more Jack’s style.
  • Orocopia Schist in the Northern Plomosa Mountains, West-Central Arizona: a Laramide Subduction Complex Exhumed in a Miocene Metamorphic Core Complex

    Orocopia Schist in the Northern Plomosa Mountains, West-Central Arizona: a Laramide Subduction Complex Exhumed in a Miocene Metamorphic Core Complex

    RESEARCH Orocopia Schist in the northern Plomosa Mountains, west-central Arizona: A Laramide subduction complex exhumed in a Miocene metamorphic core complex E.D. Strickland1, J.S. Singleton1, and G.B. Haxel2,3 1DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80523, USA 2U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86001, USA 3GEOLOGY PROGRAM, SCHOOL OF EARTH SCIENCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86011, USA ABSTRACT We document field relationships, petrography, and geochemistry of a newly identified exposure of Orocopia Schist, a Laramide subduction complex, in the northern Plomosa Mountains metamorphic core complex of west-central Arizona (USA). This core complex is character- ized by pervasive mylonitic fabrics associated with early Miocene intrusions. The quartzofeldspathic Orocopia Schist records top-to-the-NE mylonitization throughout its entire ~2–3 km structural thickness and 10 km2 of exposure in the footwall of the top-to-the-NE Plomosa detachment fault. The schist of the northern Plomosa Mountains locally contains graphitic plagioclase poikiloblasts and scattered coarse- grained actinolitite pods, both of which are characteristic of the Orocopia and related schists. Actinolitite pods are high in Mg, Ni, and Cr, and are interpreted as metasomatized peridotite—an association observed in Orocopia Schist at nearby Cemetery Ridge. A 3.5-km-long unit of amphibolite with minor interlayered ferromanganiferous quartzite is localized along a SE-dipping contact between the Orocopia Schist and gneiss. Based on their lithologic and geochemical characteristics, we interpret the amphibolite and quartzite as metabasalt and meta chert, respectively. The top of the Orocopia Schist is only ~3–4 km below a ca.
  • Gold Deposits Near Quartzsite, Arizona

    Gold Deposits Near Quartzsite, Arizona

    GOLD DEPOSITS NEAR QUARTZSITE, ARIZONA. By EDWARD L. JONES, Jr. INTRODUCTION. This report is based on information obtained by the writer in April and May, 1914,. while he was classifying the lands in the Colorado River Indian Reservation. The area considered includes the south­ ern part of the reservation and the region extending eastward from the reservation to the Plomosa Mountains. The geology and ore deposits within the reservation were more particularly studied, the time allotted to the examination being too short to permit detailed work in the area farther east. For information concerning placers outside the reservation the writer is indebted to Mr. E. L. Du- fourcq, who conducted the testing of placer .ground near Quartz- site. Mr. W. W. McCoy, of San Bernardino, kindly furnished the early history of the La Paz district, and Mr. Edward Beggs, of Quartzsite, gave much useful information regarding the La Paz placers. In 1909 Howland Bancroft x made a geologic reconnaissance of northern Yuma County .and much of the country around Quartz- site and farther west to the reservation line. In his report he men­ tions the La Paz district and briefly describes placers in the Plomosa Mountains and prospects on gold-bearing quartz veins in the vicinity of Quartzsite. The map that accompanies the present report (PI. IV) is compiled from the records of the General Land Office. The area within the reservation has been subdivided into sections; the land east of the reservation is unsurveyed. The mountainous areas in the reserva­ tion are indicated on this map by patterns showing the geologic rock formations; the mountains in the unsurveyed area are repre­ sented approximately by hachures.
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment

    Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment

    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
  • Pull-Apart Basins at Releasing Bends of the Sinistral Late Jurassic Mojave-Sonora Fault System

    Pull-Apart Basins at Releasing Bends of the Sinistral Late Jurassic Mojave-Sonora Fault System

    spe393-03 page 97 Geological Society of America Special Paper 393 2005 Pull-apart basins at releasing bends of the sinistral Late Jurassic Mojave-Sonora fault system Thomas H. Anderson* Department of Geology and Planetary Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA Jonathan A. Nourse Geological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California 91768, USA ABSTRACT A 200–500-km-wide belt along the southwestern margin of cratonic North America is pervaded by northwest- and east-trending faults that fl ank basins con- taining thick deposits of locally derived conglomerate and sedimentary breccia. These deposits that crop out mainly in the northern part of mainland Mexico, or southern parts of Arizona and New Mexico are unconformable at their bases, have similar Upper Jurassic and/or Lower Cretaceous stratigraphic ages, and commonly preserve volcanic components in the lower parts of upward-fi ning sections. We argue that these basins share a common structural origin, based on: (1) the presence of faults, locally preserved, that generally defi ne the basin margins, (2) similar basal units comprised of coarse conglomeratic strata derived from adjacent basement, and (3) locally preserved syntectonic relationships to bounding faults. Fault orientations, and our observation that the faults (and their associated basins) extend south to the inferred trace of the Late Jurassic Mojave-Sonora megashear, suggest that the basins formed in response to transtension associated with sinistral movement along the megashear. Northwest-striking left-lateral strike-slip faults that terminate at east-striking normal faults defi ne releasing left steps at which crustal pull-apart structures formed.
  • Annual Report on Ground Water in Arizona. Spring 1958 to Spring

    Annual Report on Ground Water in Arizona. Spring 1958 to Spring

    WATER RESOURCES REPORT NUMBER SIX ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT OBED M. LASSEN, COMMISSIONER BY W. F. HARDT, R. S. STULIK AND M. B. BOOHER PREPARED BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, UNITED STATES DEPARTM ENT OF THE INTERIOR Phoen ix, Arizona September 1959 l< i I!! CONTENTS II II Page Abstract ..................... e , •••• , ........ III , ............ .. 1 In troduct ion ........................................... 1 Scope of basic-data program ..................... 2 Current projects in Arizona ..................... 3 List of publications ............................ 5 Agricultural resume for 1958 .................... , 8 Precipi ta tion ....... , ................... , ........ 9 Surface-water diversions ........................ 10 Well-numbering system ........................... 12 Personnel .......... If .................... , •••• *' •••• 12 Aclcnowledgmen ts ....... If ............................ 14 Ground-water hydrology ............................... 14 Water-level fluctuations ........................ 16 Apache Coun ty ............................... 16 Cochise County .............................. 18 Wi 11 cox bas in ............................ 18 Doug las bas in ........................... 22 Bowie-San Simon area .................... 24 Upper San Pedro valley .................. 24 Coconino County ............................. 26 Gila County, ................................ 28 Graham COtln ty ............ , ................... 28 Greenlee County ............................... 29 ~1aricopa County ....... , .... " ............ ,
  • RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian

    RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian

    RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian sedimentary rocks associated with the Ancestral Rocky Mountains orogeny in southwestern Laurentia: Implications for continental-scale Laurentian sediment transport systems Ryan J. Leary1, Paul Umhoefer2, M. Elliot Smith2, Tyson M. Smith3, Joel E. Saylor4, Nancy Riggs2, Greg Burr2, Emma Lodes2, Daniel Foley2, Alexis Licht5, Megan A. Mueller5, and Chris Baird5 1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY, SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 87801, USA 2SCHOOL OF EARTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86011, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77204, USA 4DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA V6T1Z4, CANADA 5DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195, USA ABSTRACT The Ancestral Rocky Mountains system consists of a series of basement-cored uplifts and associated sedimentary basins that formed in southwestern Laurentia during Early Pennsylvanian–middle Permian time. This system was originally recognized by aprons of coarse, arkosic sandstone and conglomerate within the Paradox, Eagle, and Denver Basins, which surround the Front Range and Uncompahgre basement uplifts. However, substantial portions of Ancestral Rocky Mountain–adjacent basins are filled with carbonate or fine-grained quartzose material that is distinct from proximal arkosic rocks, and detrital zircon data from basins adjacent to the Ancestral Rocky Moun- tains have been interpreted to indicate that a substantial proportion of their clastic sediment was sourced from the Appalachian and/or Arctic orogenic belts and transported over long distances across Laurentia into Ancestral Rocky Mountain basins. In this study, we pres- ent new U-Pb detrital zircon data from 72 samples from strata within the Denver Basin, Eagle Basin, Paradox Basin, northern Arizona shelf, Pedregosa Basin, and Keeler–Lone Pine Basin spanning ~50 m.y.
  • And La Paz County, Arizona

    And La Paz County, Arizona

    ~ Min.era] urces of t'he Cactu Plain »and East Cact s Plain Wild rness Study Areas, La Paz County, Arizona ARIZONA AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • WASHINGTON, D.C.--Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and C Sts., NW.
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T

    Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T

    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.