DOCSLIB.ORG

Delta RMP TAC Agenda Package 2019-07-19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delta RMP TAC Agenda Package 2019-07-19 Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 1 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Friday, July 19, 2019 10:00 am – 3:30 pm Sunset Maple Room, Regional San 10060 Goethe Road, Sacramento, CA 95827 Remote Access: Phone number: (415) 594-5500 Access Code: 238-626-034# Screen Sharing: https://join.me/sfei-conf-cw2 # Agenda Item and Desired Outcomes Attachments Start & Lead 1 Introductions and Review Agenda 10:00 Review and agree on agenda and desired outcomes. Gita Kapahi 2 Decision: Approve previous TAC meeting summaries and Draft TAC Meeting 10:05 confirm/set future TAC meeting dates Summary from Stephen May 9, 2019 McCord Upcoming Scheduled Meetings (Please bring your calendar) Draft TAC Teleconference භ SC Meeting, Aug 5, 2019, DWR West Sacramento Summary from භ Long-Range Planning Workshop, July 31, 2019, May 24, 2019 Regional San භ TAC Meeting, Sept 13, 2019, Regional San භ Schedule in-person meeting for the winter 2019/2020. Desired outcome: Ɣ Approve TAC meeting summaries Ɣ Confirm future TAC/SC meeting dates 3 Information: Steering Committee Update Draft SC Meeting Summary 10:15 - 10:30 TAC co-Cchair will summarize the May 29, 2019 SC from May 29, 2019 Stephen meeting, including the decisions and action items relevant McCord to the TAC. Matt Heberger Desired Outcome: Ɣ Inform TAC regarding SC decisions and activities. Ɣ Explain the rationale and context for agenda items below. Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 2 # Agenda Item and Desired Outcomes Attachments Start & Lead 4 Technical Subcommittee and Monitoring Updates Dashboard Tables (PDF in 10:30 – 11:30 Updates on subcommittees, monitoring activities, and special agenda package, live link here): Mercury: Jay projects. Davis Desired outcome: 1. Status of Delta RMP භ Review running table of past and upcoming sampling Datasets Nutrients: Matt events. 2. Past & Planned Heberger භ Inform TAC of subcommittee activities and Monitoring Events recommendations. Pesticides: Jim Orlando CECs: Matt Heberger 5 Update on the Pesticides Interpretive Report Deltares Deliverable 3.3 11:30– 12:00 Our consultant Deltares has produced three sets of Final memorandum on Matt Heberger deliverables, including the database and a technical memo analytical methods to be describing their planned approach, and held a meeting with used (link) Delta RMP stakeholders on July 15. Staff asked the contractor wait for a “notice to proceed” pending TAC review of the data and methods. Desired outcome: x Notice to proceed with the study x Feedback from the TAC to the contractor Lunch (provided) 12:00 – 1:00 Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 3 # Agenda Item and Desired Outcomes Attachments Start & Lead 6 Recommendation: Mercury Monitoring in Tidal Wetlands Expanded mercury 1:00 – 2:00 Restoration Sites monitoring proposal Jay Davis At its May 2019 meeting, the SC requested more information (sent separately) about proposed mercury monitoring at tidal wetland restoration sites before committing funding. The SC asked for timelines for restoration projects, and where the proposed monitoring fit in to the project timeline, details on specific monitoring locations, and how the proposed restoration monitoring would benefit the Delta as a whole. Since then, staff scientists have revised and expanded the proposal for review by the TAC. Desired outcome: x TAC recommendation to the SC on whether the proposed study merits funding. 7 Discussion: New Assessment Question Related to Pesticides Memo on proposed new 2:00 – 2:30 and Human Health assessment question for Matt Heberger The Pesticides Subcommittee recommended that the pesticides program consider adding a management question related to human health and drinking water impacts. Desired outcome: x TAC recommendation to the SC to add a new assessment question. 8 Discussion: Long-Range Planning Workshop Preview Table of Management 2:30 – 3:00 Drivers (link) On July 31, we will have an all-day long-range planning Matt Heberger workshop with TAC and SC members. The goals are to set priorities for monitoring and studies for the next 5 years, to SWOT worksheet make the most effective use of the program’s resources. (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) Desired outcomes: x TAC familiarity with the goals of the workshop and tools that we will use. x Input into the goals and format of the workshop. 9 Information: Status of Deliverables and Action Items Delta RMP Stoplight 3:00 – 3:15 Desired outcomes: Reports භ Inform TAC about the status of RMP deliverables. Matt Heberger භ Review action items from today’s meeting. 10 Updates and Wrap-up 3:15 – 3:30 Desired outcomes: Stephen භ Plan agenda items for future meetings McCord Adjourn 3:30 Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 24 Materials for Agenda Item 4 Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 25 ÿÿ ÿÿ !ÿ #$ÿ%&'$!'ÿ()00)1203 456 AÿB ÿ 74ÿ8 9 ÿ @ B@C D@@ EF0GH0(I%Pÿ11H1QRÿ120GS!TU%TVRÿW$!TX EF0GH0(I%Pÿ11H1QRÿ120GS!TU%TVRÿEY#`X EF0GH0(a!&$ÿ0QRÿ120GS!TU%TVRÿEY#`G EF0GH0(bcdÿ0eH0XRÿ120GS!TU%TVRÿW$!TX EF0GH0(E!ÿ1fRÿ120(S!TU%TVRÿW$!TX EF0GH0(I&TY ÿ1XRÿ120(S!TU%TVRÿW$!TX EF0(H0fI%Pÿ0eH0fRÿ120(S!TU%TVRÿEY#`G EF0(H0fgU$ÿ0fH03Rÿ120(S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tÿh'ÿa!'Yi!h$GGÿ#Y$!#ÿ#i& !'ÿpcTÿc$`ÿq$!Tÿh'ÿ#!'Yi!h$ EF0(H0f rhÿ13HQ2Rÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tÿh'ÿa!'Yi!h$ffÿ#Y$!#ÿ#i& !'ÿpcTÿq$!TRÿGÿ#Y$!#ÿpcTÿ#!'Yi!h$ EF0(H0f E!ÿ1GH1(Rÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0(H0f STÿ03H12Rÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0(H0f I&Tÿ0GH0fRÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tÿh'ÿa!'Yi!h$ffÿ#Y$!#ÿ#i& !'ÿpcTÿq$!TRÿGÿ#Y$!#ÿpcTÿ#!'Yi!h$ EF0(H0f SVÿ0XH0GRÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0(H0f r%hÿ12H10Rÿ120f S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tÿh'ÿa!'Yi!h$ffÿ#Y$!#ÿ#i& !'ÿpcTÿq$!TRÿGÿ#Y$!#ÿpcTÿ#!'Yi!h$ a!'Yi!h$ÿ#i& YhPÿUch'%U$!'ÿpcTÿch!ÿV!Tÿch Vsÿ'Tc&&!'ÿYhÿEF0fH EF0fH03r% ÿ3H02Rÿ120fS!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf03 EF0fH03I%Pÿ0QH0eRÿ120fS!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03a!&$ÿ120fS!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03gU$ÿ120fS!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03I%Pÿ12H11Rÿ120fS!TU%TVRÿEY#`( EF0fH03rhÿ10H11Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03E!ÿ0fH03Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03STÿ12H10Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03I&Tÿ11H1QRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03SVÿ12H10Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF0fH03r%hÿ0(H03Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF03H12t hh!'ÿr% ÿ0XH0GRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF03H12t hh!'ÿI%PÿXHfRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿEY#`( EF03H12t hh!'ÿI%Pÿ01H0XRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿEY#`2Ec cq%&ÿ#i& YhPÿYpÿh!U!##TV EF03H12t hh!'ÿI%Pÿ0QH0eRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF03H12t hh!'ÿa!&ÿ0GH0(Rÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF03H12t hh!'ÿgU$ÿ0eH0XRÿ1203S!TU%TVRÿW$!Tf EF03H12t hh!'ÿSTU`ÿ1212S! TU%TVRÿW$!TG1ÿ#Y$!#ÿqY ÿ!ÿ'Tc&&!'ÿYhÿ1203 EF03H12t hh!'ÿI&TY ÿ1212S! TU%TVRÿW$!TG EF03H12t hh!'ÿSVÿ1212S! TU%TVRÿW$!TG EF03H12t hh!'ÿr%h!ÿ1212S! TU%TVRÿW$!TG 9 ÿuÿu55 ÿ@ÿ ÿÿv ÿC ÿv6ÿwBDÿ ÿxxÿuuÿÿ4vÿyÿ 456ÿB5v4@@ 4 AÿB ÿ 74ÿ8 9 ÿ @ B@C D@@ WF1203!Uÿ0fH03Rÿ120ft!#$YUY'!#GEYT#$ÿE %#`ÿHÿpYT#$ÿ!d!h$ÿ$cÿUcYhUY'!ÿqY$`ÿpYT#$ÿicTÿp )qYh$!Tÿ#$cTiÿ I$ÿ!U`ÿ!d!h$Rÿ#i& !ÿeÿTh'ciÿ aÿ#Y$!#ÿh'ÿh'ÿ$`!ÿ1ÿpY!'ÿ #Y$!# WF1203E!ÿeHGRÿ1203t!#$YUY'!#Ga!Uch'ÿWYh$!Tÿa$cTi WF1203I&TY ÿ13HQ2Rÿ1203t!#$YUY'!#G`YT'ÿWYh$!Tÿa$cTiÿcTÿa&TYhPÿahcqi! $ÿT%hcppÿ&TYcTÿ$cÿYTTYP$Ych WF1203r%h!ÿ0(H0ft!#$YUY'!#Ga&TYhP WF1203 t hh!'ÿr% Vÿ11H1Q t!#$YUY'!#Ga%ii!T WF1203 t hh!'ÿa!&$ÿ0GH0( t!#$YUY'!#GE WF1212t hh!'ÿp )qYh$!Tÿ1212 t!#$YUY'!# GEYT#$ÿE %#` Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 26 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ !"#ÿ $% ÿ ÿ ÿÿ"#ÿ ÿ&''ÿ"ÿÿ# "#ÿ( "# & ÿ( & )ÿ( ) 01234ÿ678ÿ692983ÿ@7AB278BACÿ3D3A24ÿ27ÿE3ÿFG1AA3HÿEIÿPQRÿ1AHÿSQTQÿ42166ÿBAÿU7GG1E7812B7AÿVB2WÿX342BUBH34ÿQ9EU7@@B2233Yÿ `aaÿcdeeÿfghiaÿpqrÿstuÿsvuwxauÿyawgiÿtsÿgi ÿwu auq 928B3A24 ÿQB234ÿ B4U1Gÿ31801237AB278BACÿG3@3A2 Q1@FG3HR7@@3A24 )(( "ÿ((ÿ(& ÿ#%) & dÿe& ÿfgÿ !)ÿ'ÿgÿ" ÿ ÿ'ÿg dÿ& jÿk ÿ'ÿ% ÿ& ÿ ÿ &h ÿ di ÿlÿ"" dÿÿmdÿÿnÿgÿ ÿ jÿo#ÿÿ & ÿÿ% ÿ"#ÿ ÿ& ÿ'ÿ(jÿ )((odÿ(p(ÿ(& ÿ#%) & dÿe& ÿfgÿ !q " ÿ'ÿ'ÿ& ÿ%%ÿÿ ÿ & ÿÿ &" ÿ'& j &h ÿ di " ÿ ÿ r&dÿsÿpÿÿ(& ÿ#%) & dÿe& ÿfgÿ ! ÿ& ÿf i '& ÿÿ)(( &h ÿ di " ÿ ÿ kÿ(ÿ(ÿ(ÿ(& ÿ#%) & dÿe& ÿfgÿ !$% ÿ& ÿf" i '& ÿÿ)(( &h ÿ di tW3ÿSQTQÿuB7C37UW3@BU1Gÿv34318UWÿT879FÿW14ÿU7@FG323Hÿ1GGÿwÿ76ÿ2W3ÿFG1AA3HÿU89B434xÿ1AHÿB4ÿ1A1GIyBACÿH121ÿ1AHÿV8B2BACÿ1ÿ83F782Yÿ z&#ÿ(gÿ(e%"%dÿ ÿ{ |ÿ ( ÿ' ÿ '' ÿ# ÿ ÿ "d ÿ |d ÿ'ÿÿ m "d ÿ}( lÿÿ " ÿ% ÿ & ~ÿm "d ÿ}(ÿÿ )(( r&ÿqh ÿÿo ÿ # e%"%dÿ ÿ{ |ÿ (m "d ÿ}ÿ| dÿ{ ÿ&dÿÿe% ÿ&#%ÿÿ )(( "ÿÿÿkÿ(ÿ( m "d ÿ} ÿ((sppg(pÿ odÿÿ(e%"%dÿ|dÿ ()ÿ'ÿgÿ" ÿ "#ÿ h ~ÿ " ÿÿ| ÿ"ÿ ÿ )(( { |ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}( " ÿ ÿÿ %ÿ|ÿ& ÿ|ÿd e%"%dÿ|dÿ )((r&dÿÿ({ |ÿ "#ÿh ÿ} ( ÿ'ÿgÿ "#ÿ h e%"%dÿ|dÿ )(( ÿz&#ÿÿ( { |ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}g $% ÿ "#ÿ h ÿ" ÿ RR4 m ÿ"#ÿ'ÿeeÿ #ÿÿ& dÿ& djÿ "#ÿ" ÿÿ| #ÿ'ÿ% ÿ)(ÿ"ÿ& dÿÿ% ÿ'ÿ'ÿ(j ÿQB234ÿ B4U1Gÿ31801237AB278BACÿG3@3A2 Q1@FG3HR7@@3A24 )( ÿz&#ÿ((pÿ()%ÿ "#ÿ&se ÿ%ÿ &dÿ"'%ÿ "# )($m ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}(ÿ& dÿ'& j & dÿ #ÿÿ'ÿÿ d % ÿ ÿÿ % ÿ h ÿ )($m ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}" ÿ|&ÿ &dÿ%&#%&ÿ% ÿd mqo {ÿÿ " ÿpÿ ÿ|dÿ|~ÿ){ÿÿ " ÿgÿ ÿ )($m ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}g' ÿ| # !% jÿ ÿÿ "ÿÿdÿ% ÿ ÿ| ÿ% ÿÿ ÿÿ% ÿ )($m ÿ "#ÿh ÿ}s ÿ"| jÿ )($mhh ÿf iÿ "#ÿ& )($m ÿ "#ÿ&g Delta RMP TAC Meeting Agenda Package 2019-07-14, page 27 ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ !ÿ"#$!$%ÿ&'((')0(1 23 2ÿ425678 9@AB5C7C 7D79 EF(GH(IÿP"Qÿ)0(GÿHÿP"Rÿ)0(IÿS"TTR!ÿU ÿ Y V"W `$ÿR$ÿ#"WXQÿaWÿaWÿSbcdÿSebefdÿR$ÿfghi V !WXW$ EFÿ(GH(IÿpW$ÿq "TqR! ÿr!q#T!"Tdÿ Y #sdÿbtdÿ!XuvÿpwTÿS"TTR!ÿU ÿV !WXW$ V"W `$ÿR$ÿ#"WXQÿaWÿaWÿSbcdÿSebef EF(IH(&ÿP"Qÿ)0(IÿHÿP"Rÿ)0(&ÿS"TTR!ÿU ÿ Y V"W `$ÿR$ÿ#"WXQÿaWÿaWÿSbcdÿSebefdÿR$ÿfghi V !WXW$ EFÿ(IH(&ÿpW$ÿq "TqR! ÿr!q#T!"Tdÿ Y V"W `$ÿR$ÿ#"WXQÿaWÿaWÿSbcdÿSebef #sdÿbtdÿ!XuvÿpwTÿS"TTR!ÿU ÿV !WXW$ gF)0(1ÿS"TTR!ÿU ÿV !WXW$ EWT !ÿ q# ÿXwX!$ÿbXÿ(1dÿ)0(xuÿiq# ÿ`aÿRÿ #TwX $ÿR$ÿ!ÿRQy$uÿVTwaW WwRÿ$!ÿpwTÿ!`ÿpWT !ÿcÿ q#WRÿaR! ÿ` ÿRÿ `T$ÿW!`ÿ!`ÿSÿR$ÿ wTTw"# uÿ ÿwpÿ&'((')0(1dÿUiiÿ !ppÿTÿwTWRÿwRÿ Xwq#WWRÿ!`ÿ$!ÿWRÿSebefÿpwTq!ÿpwTÿ!TR qW WwRÿ!wÿiSÿ pwTÿpwTq!!WRÿR$ÿ uÿ`ÿ$!ÿWÿÿ $ÿWRÿ!wÿ!X` ÿ rpWT !ÿcÿaR! dÿ XwR$ÿcÿaR! vuÿ B7D7 EF(GH(Iÿ"!WXÿwWXW!Qÿ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,586,504 B2 Wright Et Al
    USOO85865.04B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,586,504 B2 Wright et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 19, 2013 (54) HERBICIDAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS GLYPHOSATE AND A PYRONE ANALOG AU 100.73/92 B 10, 1992 CA 2340240 A1 2, 2000 (75) Inventors: Daniel R. Wright, St. Louis, MO (US); EP O 808 569 A1 11, 1997 Joseph J. Sandbrink, Chesterfield, MO GB 2267 825 A 12/1993 (US); Paul G. Ratliff, Olivette, MO WO 99/00013 1, 1999 WO OO,30452 6, 2000 (US) WO OO,642.57 11, 2000 WO OO/67571 11, 2000 (73) Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC, St. Louis, WO O1/35740 A2 5, 2001 MO (US) WO 02/21924 A2 3, 2002 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Exhibit PMH-17 Supplemental Labeling regarding Roundup Pro U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Herbicide by Monsanto, EPA Reg. No. 524-475 (Nov. 1995), 11 pageS. (21) Appl. No.: 13/404,861 Exhibit PMH-18 Notice of Pesticide Registration issued on Oct. 5, 2000, 35 pages. Exhibit PMH-19 EPA Application for Pesticide, ID No. 200405 (22) Filed: Feb. 24, 2012 (Sep. 1995), 33 pages. Exhibit PMH-20-Documentation regarding Starmas Racun/ (65) Prior Publication Data Rumpai Herbicide (bears the year 2003), 10 pages. Exhibit PMH-21—Documentation regarding Starmix Racun/ US 2012/O157309 A1 Jun. 21, 2012 Rumpai Herbicide (Date Unknown), 3 pages. Exhibit PMH-22—article entitled Control of Eucalyptus grandis cut stumps by Keith Little et al., ICFR Bulletin Series, No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers
    Title Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers in Soil and Water Mohammadkazem Ramezani B.Sc. Agronomy, M.Sc. Weed Science This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide School of Agriculture, Food & Wine The University of Adelaide Waite Campus, South Australia 2007 Declaration This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying. Mohammadkazem Ramezani ii Abstract Imidazolinones represent a new class of herbicides with low mammalian toxicity that can be used at low application rates, either pre- or post-emergence for the control of a wide range of weeds in broadleaf and cereal crops, and non-crop situations. All imidazolinone herbicides are chiral, containing two enantiomers that derive from the chiral centre of the imidazolinone ring. The inhibitory activity of the R(+) enantiomer is nearly eight times greater than that of the S(-) enantiomer. The use of imidazolinone herbicides has increased in recent years in Australia owing to increased popularity of pulses and the introduction of imidazolinone-tolerant canola and wheat. Concerns have been raised about the potential carry over damage to the subsequent crops grown in rotation with legumes and herbicide tolerant crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) § 455.61
    § 455.61 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) from: the operation of employee show- § 455.64 Effluent limitations guidelines ers and laundry facilities; the testing representing the degree of effluent of fire protection equipment; the test- reduction attainable by the applica- ing and emergency operation of safety tion of the best available tech- showers and eye washes; or storm nology economically achievable water. (BAT). (d) The provisions of this subpart do Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 not apply to wastewater discharges through 125.32, any existing point from the repackaging of microorga- source subject to this subpart must nisms or Group 1 Mixtures, as defined achieve effluent limitations rep- under § 455.10, or non-agricultural pes- resenting the degree of effluent reduc- ticide products. tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi- § 455.61 Special definitions. cally achievable: There shall be no dis- Process wastewater, for this subpart, charge of process wastewater pollut- means all wastewater except for sani- ants. tary water and those wastewaters ex- § 455.65 New source performance cluded from the applicability of the standards (NSPS). rule in § 455.60. Any new source subject to this sub- § 455.62 Effluent limitations guidelines part which discharges process waste- representing the degree of effluent water pollutants must meet the fol- reduction attainable by the applica- lowing standards: There shall be no dis- tion of the best practicable pollut- charge of process wastewater pollut- ant control technology (BPT). ants. Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point § 455.66 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Nitroaromatic Pesticides with Zero-Valent Iron
    Chemosphere 54 (2004) 255–263 www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Reduction of nitroaromatic pesticides with zero-valent iron Young-Soo Keum, Qing X. Li * Department of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii, 1955 East-West Road, Ag Sci 218, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 5 February 2003; received in revised form 4 June 2003; accepted 4 August 2003 Abstract Reduction of eleven nitroaromatic pesticides was studied with zero-valent iron powder. Average half-lives ranged from 2.8 to 6.3 h and the parent compounds were completely reduced after 48–96 h. The di-nitro groups of the 2,6- dinitroaniline herbicides were rapidly reduced to the corresponding diamines, with a negligible amount of partially reduced monoamino or nitroso products. Low levels of de-alkylated products were observed after 10 days. The nitro group of the organophosphorus insecticides was reduced dominantly to the monoamines but in a slower rate than the 2,6-dinitroanilines. A trace amount of oxon products was found. Reduction of nitro to amino was also the predominant reaction for the diphenyl ether herbicides. Aromatic de-chlorination and de-alkylation were minor reactions. These amine products were more stable than the parent compounds and 60% or more of the amines were detected after two weeks. Humic acid decreased the reduction rates of pendimethalin, and dichlone (a known quinone redox mediator) counteracted the effect of humic acid on the reactivity. Storage of iron powder under air decreased the reactivity very rapidly due to iron oxidation. Repeated use of iron powder also showed similar results. The reduced activity of air- oxidized iron was recovered by purging with hydrogen, but not nitrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Imazapic/Imazapyr and Other Herbicides in Mixtures for The
    Efficacy of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mixtures for the control of Digitaria insularis prior to soybean sowing Efectividad de imazapic/imazapyr y otros herbicidas en mezclas para el control de Digitaria insularis en pre-siembra de soya Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht1, Leandro Paiola Albrecht1, André Felipe Moreira Silva²*, Romulo Augusto Ramos³, Everson Pedro Zeny³, Juliano Bortoluzzi Lorenzetti4, Maikon Tiago Yamada Danilussi4, and Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso4 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Herbicide mixtures, use of multiple sites of action, and other Las mezclas entre herbicidas, el uso de múltiples sitios de acción weed management practices are necessary to avoid cases of y otras prácticas de manejo de malezas son necesarias para biotype resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evitar otros casos de resistencia de biotipos. El objetivo de este efficiency of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mix- estudio fue evaluar la eficiencia de imazapic/imazapyr y otros tures to control Digitaria insularis at burndown before soybean herbicidas en mezclas para controlar Digitaria insularis en la sowing. This field research was conducted in Umuarama, State desecación antes de la siembra de soya. Esta investigación de of Parana (PR), Brazil, in the 2018/19 soybean season. The ex- campo se realizó en Umuarama, Estado de Paraná (PR), Brasil, periment was conducted in a randomized block experimental en la cosecha de soya de 2018/19. El experimento se realizó en design with four replicates and 11 treatments composed of the un diseño experimental de bloques al azar, con cuatro repe- application of glyphosate, clethodim, haloxyfop, imazapic/ ticiones y 11 tratamientos, compuestos por la aplicación de imazapyr, glufosinate, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), glifosato, cletodim, haloxifop, imazapic/imazapir, glufosinato, dicamba, triclopyr, and saflufenacil, in mixtures.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN for Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020
    PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN For Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020 Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water & Groundwater Protection Division A Plan to Sample for Chemicals with a Vermont Health Advisory As required by Act 21 (2019), Section 10(b), the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, on or before January 1, 2020, must publish for public review and comment a plan to collect data for contaminants in drinking water from public community water systems and all non-transient non-community water systems, for which a health advisory has been established, but no Maximum Contaminant Level has been adopted. These health advisories are referred to as Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) in this document. 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 3 II. Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 III. Determining the VHA contaminants for sampling at public water systems ………..Page 6 IV. Sampling Considerations …..…………………………………………………………………………….. Page 10 V. Proposed Sampling Plan ………………………………………………………………………….………..Page 12 Attachments Table 1 Complete List of Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) …………………………………………..Page 13 Table 2 Proposed List of VHAs with Potential Concern ……………………………………………………Page 18 2 | P a g e I. Executive Summary The Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources was tasked with developing a sampling plan for public review, for certain drinking water contaminants that have an established health advisory, also known as the Vermont Health Advisory (VHA) but have no Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). This Sampling Plan (Plan) is targeted to public community and public non- transient non-community water systems. To provide context for public water system regulation, and standards that apply, a discussion of how VHAs and MCLs are determined is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Aminopyralid Ecological Risk Assessment Final
    Aminopyralid Ecological Risk Assessment Final U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Washington, D.C. December 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States Department of the Interior (USDOI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administers about 247.9 million acres in 17 western states in the continental United States (U.S.) and Alaska. One of the BLM’s highest priorities is to promote ecosystem health, and one of the greatest obstacles to achieving this goal is the rapid expansion of invasive plants (including noxious weeds and other plants not native to an area) across public lands. These invasive plants can dominate and often cause permanent damage to natural plant communities. If not eradicated or controlled, invasive plants will jeopardize the health of public lands and the activities that occur on them. Herbicides are one method employed by the BLM to control these plants. In 2007, the BLM published the Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on Bureau of Land Management Lands in 17 Western States Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (17-States PEIS). The Record of Decision (ROD) for the 17-States PEIS allowed the BLM to use 18 herbicide active ingredients available for a full range of vegetation treatments in 17 western states. In the ROD, the BLM also identified a protocol for identifying, evaluating, and using new herbicide active ingredients. Under the protocol, the BLM would not be allowed to use a new herbicide active ingredient until the agency 1) assessed the hazards and risks from using the new herbicide active ingredient, and 2) prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act to assess the impacts of using new herbicide active ingredient on the natural, cultural, and social environment.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Weed Control-Pasture and Range-SDSU
    iGrow.org 2017 Weed Control Pasture and Range Paul O. Johnson | SDSU Extension Weed Science Coordinator David Vos | SDSU Ag Research Manager Jill Alms | SDSU Ag Research Manager Leon J. Wrage | SDSU Distinguished Professor Emeritus Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science College of Agriculture & Biological Sciences | agronomy Table of Contents Accurate (metsulfuron) . 13 Latigo (dicamba+2,4-D) . 5 Amber (triasulfuron) . 14 Milestone (aminopyralid) . 8 Banvel (dicamba) . 4 Opensight (aminopyralid+metsulfuron) . 9 Brash (dicamba+2,4-D) . 5 Overdrive (dicamba+diflufenzopyr) . 6 Brush-Rhap (dicamba+2,4-D) . 5 Paraquat (paraquat) . 17 Capstone (aminopyralid+triclopyr) . 10 Para-Shot (paraquat) . 17 Chaparral (aminopyralid+metsulfuron) . 9 Parazone (paraquat) . 17 Chisum (metsulfuron+chlorsulfuron) . 13 PastureGard HL (triclopyr+fluroxypyr) . 11 Cimarron Max (metsulfuron+dicamba + 2,4-D) . 13 Plateau (imazapic) . 12, 16 Cimarron Plus (metsulfuron+chlorsulfuron) . 13 QuinStar (quinclorac) . 15 Cimarron Xtra (metsulfuron+chlorsulfuron) . 14 RangeStar (dicamba+2,4-D) . 5 Clarity (dicamba) . 4 Rave (triasulfuron+dicamba) . .15 Clash (dicamba) . 4 Remedy Ultra (triclopyr) . .11 Clean Slate (clopyralid) . 10 Rifle (dicamba) . 4 Comet (fluroxypyr) . 11 Rifle-D(dicamba+2,4-D) . 5 Commando (clopyralid+2,4-D) . 10 Scorch (dicamba+2,4-D+fluroxypyr) . 6 Crossbow, Crossbow L (triclopyr+2,4-D) . 11 Spike (tebuthiuron) . 15 Crossroad (triclopyr+2,4-D) . 11 Spur (clopyralid) . 10 Curtail (clopyralid+2,4-D) . 10 Sterling Blue (dicamba) . 4 Cutback (clopyralid+2,4-D) . 10. Surmount (picloram+fluroxypyr) . 8 Cyclone (paraquat) . 17 Stinger (clopyralid) . 10 Detail (saflufenacil) . 12 Telar (chlorsulfuron) . 14 Detonate (dicamba) . 4 Tie Down (triasulfuron+dicamba) . 15 Devour (paraquat) . 17 Tordon (picloram) . 6 Diablo (dicamba) .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Imazapyr and Imazamox for Control of Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum Aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.)
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 45: 132-136 Comparison of Imazapyr and Imazamox for Control of Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.) RYAN M. WERSAL1 AND JOHN D. MADSEN1,2 INTRODUCTION techniques (Moreira et al. 1999). To date, chemical control has been the most effective method for controlling infesta- Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell. Verdc) is an in- tions of M. aquaticum. Contact herbicides such as diquat vasive aquatic plant to the United States that is native to South (6,7-dihydrodipyrido (1,2-a:2’,1’-c) pyrazinedium dibro- America. Myriophyllum aquaticum is described as “stout, stems mide) and endothall (7-oxabicyclo (2.2.1) heptane-2,3-dicar- moderately elongate, partially submersed but with portions of boxylic acid) have been evaluated with mixed results leafy branches emersed (Godfrey and Wooten 1981). Emer- (Moreira et al. 1999, Westerdahl and Getsinger 1988). Con- gent leaves are whorled, stiff, usually with 20 or more linear fil- tact herbicides are typically effective for short-term control, iform divisions, appearing feather-like and grayish green. but significant regrowth of M. aquaticum typically occurs and Submersed shoots are comprised of whorls of four to six fila- multiple applications are necessary (Moreira et al. 1999). mentous, pectinate, red or orange, leaves arising from each Therefore, the use of a systemic herbicide may be more ef- node. Flowers are all pistillate, borne in the axils of unreduced fective in controlling this species. leaves (Godfrey and Wooten 1981). Myriophyllum aquaticum is Imazapyr (2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)5-oxo- dioecious, however only pistillate plants are found outside of 1H-imazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid) is a systemic herbi- its native range (Sutton 1985).
    [Show full text]