Public Notice-Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Notice-Overview Legislative Briefing Fallen Journalists Memorial Updated March 9, 2020 Background: Violence against journalists alarmed our industry on June 28, 2018, when a gunman entered the Capital- Gazette in Annapolis, MD, and shot dead four veteran journalists and a sales associate. It was the most deadly and notorious assault on an American journalist on US soil since the on-air shooting of a Roanoke, VA, TV broadcaster in 2015. Journalists at risk abroad as they cover armed conflict have been a part of America’s story for centuries. But threats to journalists are regrettably common in large media markets and even America’s hometowns. With the domestic risk suddenly brought home by the Annapolis shootings, the call to memorialize the sacrifices of those who gave their lives to inform readers and viewers has grown. Prominent journalists ranging World War II’s Ernie Pyle to Michael Kelly of the Washington Post and Daniel Pearl of the Wall Street Journal are known to historians, but the hundred or more Civil War correspondents and photographers who lost their lives are memorialized only in a monument in remote regions of the Catoctin Mountains. And an interactive exhibit of journalist fatalities that was part of the Newseum was taken down when that museum closed in January 2020. No national memorial recognizes all of these sacrifices given in the name of the First Amendment and the need for an informed public. In June 2019, the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation announced it would begin working with Congress and the National Park Service to identify a location for a privately-funded memorial. The Foundation is led by former Rep. David Dreier, Chairman of Tribune Publishing. Initial funding for the Foundation was provided by contributions from the Annenberg Foundation and the Michael and Jacky Ferro Foundation. The editor of the Capital Gazette said to Congress recently: “Journalism is vital to the success of our democracy. I know it at the local level, some of you know it at the national level, and I think a memorial like this is a just and fitting way to recognize that importance to our nation.” Supporters of the memorial have testified that the best way to teach the next generation of the importance of journalists is to have a commemorative work that they can visit when they come to Washington. The Foundation intends to finance the siting, building and management of the Memorial. But it requires the consent of Congress to put the Memorial on federal grounds. National Newspaper Association endorses the legislation to establish the memorial and urges Members of Congress to quickly vote their approval. Legislative Action: On June 25, 2019, Senators Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Rob Portman (R-OH) and Representatives Grace Napolitano (D-CA) and Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced legislation in Congress to honor fallen journalists by authorizing the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation (FJM Foundation) to establish a commemorative work on federally owned and administered land in the District of Columbia. The bills are HR 3465 and S 1969. The legislation awaits action on the House floor. In the Senate, it is pending before the Subcommittee on National Parks, chaired by Sen. Steve Daines, R-MT. Sen. Angus King, I-ME, is the ranking member. .
Recommended publications
  • Download Music for Free.] in Work, Even Though It Gains Access to It
    Vol. 54 No. 3 NIEMAN REPORTS Fall 2000 THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY 4 Narrative Journalism 5 Narrative Journalism Comes of Age BY MARK KRAMER 9 Exploring Relationships Across Racial Lines BY GERALD BOYD 11 The False Dichotomy and Narrative Journalism BY ROY PETER CLARK 13 The Verdict Is in the 112th Paragraph BY THOMAS FRENCH 16 ‘Just Write What Happened.’ BY WILLIAM F. WOO 18 The State of Narrative Nonfiction Writing ROBERT VARE 20 Talking About Narrative Journalism A PANEL OF JOURNALISTS 23 ‘Narrative Writing Looked Easy.’ BY RICHARD READ 25 Narrative Journalism Goes Multimedia BY MARK BOWDEN 29 Weaving Storytelling Into Breaking News BY RICK BRAGG 31 The Perils of Lunch With Sharon Stone BY ANTHONY DECURTIS 33 Lulling Viewers Into a State of Complicity BY TED KOPPEL 34 Sticky Storytelling BY ROBERT KRULWICH 35 Has the Camera’s Eye Replaced the Writer’s Descriptive Hand? MICHAEL KELLY 37 Narrative Storytelling in a Drive-By Medium BY CAROLYN MUNGO 39 Combining Narrative With Analysis BY LAURA SESSIONS STEPP 42 Literary Nonfiction Constructs a Narrative Foundation BY MADELEINE BLAIS 43 Me and the System: The Personal Essay and Health Policy BY FITZHUGH MULLAN 45 Photojournalism 46 Photographs BY JAMES NACHTWEY 48 The Unbearable Weight of Witness BY MICHELE MCDONALD 49 Photographers Can’t Hide Behind Their Cameras BY STEVE NORTHUP 51 Do Images of War Need Justification? BY PHILIP CAPUTO Cover photo: A Muslim man begs for his life as he is taken prisoner by Arkan’s Tigers during the first battle for Bosnia in March 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Options for U.S
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE POLICY FOCUS IRAQ: OPTIONS FOR U.S. POLICY LAURIE MYLROIE RESEARCH MEMORANDUM NUMBER TWENTY-ONE MAY 1993 Cover and title page illustrations from windows of the tom Bi-AmnW Mosque. 990-1013 THE AUTHOR Laurie Mylroie is Arab Affairs Fellow at The Washington Institute. She has previously taught in the Department of Government at Harvard University and at the U.S. Naval War College. Among Dr. Mylroie's many published works on Iraq are Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf (with Judith Miller), and The Future of Iraq (Washington Institute Policy Paper Number 24). The views expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and should not necessarily be construed as representing those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Clinton administration inherited a flawed Iraq policy from the Bush administration, but, in formulating a new policy, it has failed to accurately define those flaws. Its emphasis on "depersonalizing" the conflict with Iraq by shifting the focus from Saddam Hussein to Baghdad's compliance with relevant UN resolutions may mean that the Clinton administration will eventually, if reluctantly, come to terms with Saddam's dogged hold on power and accept a diluted form of Iraqi compliance with the resolutions. Although that may be far from the administration's intent, the present formulation of U.S. policy may weaken the coalition and lead to that result nonetheless. The Clinton administration has stated that it will enforce all UN resolutions, including Resolution 687, which, inter alia, provides for stripping Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, and Resolution 688, which demands that Baghdad cease to repress its population.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Sense Common Sense
    CCOMMONOMMON SSENSEENSE GGOVERNMENTOVERNMENT WWORKSORKS BBETTERETTER &C&COSTSOSTS LLESSESS Vice President Al Gore Third ReportReport of of thethe National Performance Performance Review Review Common Sense Government Works Better and Costs Less Vice President Al Gore Third Report of the National Performance Review Contents Introduction.................................................................................................1 Calling in the Real Experts............................................................................1 There’s a Wrong Way and a Right Way .........................................................2 Reclaiming Government “For the People”.....................................................2 Delivering the Goods at Last.........................................................................6 It’s Never Finished.........................................................................................6 1. A Government That Makes Sense........................................11 The Real Business of Government ..............................................................12 Americans Want a Government That Works Better, Costs Less...................13 Why We Have a Federal Government.........................................................14 How Things Got Out of Hand...................................................................16 Failing to Change With a Changing World.................................................16 Going By the Book .....................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S5386
    S5386 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE April 11, 2003 (c) EFFECT ON ENTITLEMENT.—Nothing in from oral and pharyngeal cancers each The Samuel D. Harris National Mu- this Act shall be construed to change the year. seum of Dentistry has been endorsed by total acreage of land to which Newtok is en- The report called for the develop- the American Dental Association, the titled under ANCSA. ment of a National Oral Health Plan, American Association of Dental (d) EFFECT ON NEWTOK LANDS.—The Newtok Lands shall be included in the and recommended that actions be Schools, Oral Health America, the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge as of taken to ‘‘change perceptions regard- Pierre Fauchard Academy, the Amer- the date of acceptance of the conveyance of ing oral health and disease so that oral ican College of Dentists, the Inter- those lands from Newtok, except that resi- health becomes an accepted component national College of Dentists, and the dents of the Village of Newtok, Alaska, shall of general health.’’ By designating an American Academy of the History of retain access rights to subsistence resources official national museum and learning Dentistry. I ask unanimous consent on those public lands as guaranteed under center dedicated to dentistry, this leg- ANILCA section 811 (16 U.S.C. 3121), and to that the text of a letter from the subsistence uses, such as traditional subsist- islation takes an important step to- American Dental Association in sup- ence fishing, hunting and gathering, con- ward the achievement of this goal. port of this legislation be printed in sistent with ANILCA section 803 (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 in Review ABOUT NLGJA
    2016 In Review ABOUT NLGJA NLGJA – The Association of LGBTQ Journalists is the premier network of LGBTQ media professionals and those who support the highest journalistic standards in the coverage of LGBTQ issues. NLGJA provides its members with skill-building, educational programming and professional development opportunities. As the association of LGBTQ media professionals, we offer members the space to engage with other professionals for both career advancement and the chance to expand their personal networks. Through our commitment to fair and accurate LGBTQ coverage, NLGJA creates tools for journalists by journalists on how to cover the community and issues. NLGJA’s Goals • Enhance the professionalism, skills and career opportunities for LGBTQ journalists while equipping the LGBTQ community with tools and strategies for media access and accountability • Strengthen the identity, respect and status of LGBTQ journalists in the newsroom and throughout the practice of journalism • Advocate for the highest journalistic and ethical standards in the coverage of LGBTQ issues while holding news organizations accountable for their coverage • Collaborate with other professional journalist associations and promote the principles of inclusion and diversity within our ranks • Provide mentoring and leadership to future journalists and support LGBTQ and ally student journalists in order to develop the next generation of professional journalists committed to fair and accurate coverage 2 Introduction NLGJA 2016 In Review NLGJA 2016 In Review Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Saddam Hussein: Master Air Strategist
    J Course II National War College Saddam Hussein: Master Air Strategist Charles J. Dunlap, Jr., Lt Col, USAF Seminar L 8 November 1991 L'.':''- .... ~':.~ :':' ~ '~ "i~':'-~'a!"~ "% SPEC~AS :~..~.~,..:_~:.,~.'-"': " :"' ....~ ~ONS' As far as Saddam Hussein being a great military strategist, he is neither a strategist, nor is he schooled in the operational arts, nor is he a tactician, nor is he a general, nor is he a soldier. Other than that, he's a great military man. 1 want you to know that. General H. Norman Schwarzkopf l One may know how to win, but cannot necessarily do so. Sun Tzu 2 Fashionable thinking characterizes Saddam Hussein as the "antithesis of a strategist."3 But, as Sun Tzu suggests, it is precipitous to draw conclusions about the caliber of a strategist simply because he did not prevail in a given contest. Much of the credit for Hussein's failure to prevail is attributed to the air campaign. What was Hussein's strategy to deal with over 2,600 Coalition aircraft arrayed against his force of just 750 planes? 4 Obviously, a definitive statement of Hussein's strategic plan is not available, and one might never be obtainable. 5 Nonetheless, sufficient evidence exists to conclude that Hussein had a strategy, and one that was well-conceived given his situation. Moreover, his strategy was consonant with much of the thinking espoused by Sun Tzu, one of history's greatest theorists of military strategy. Of particular importance to U.S. planners is that Hussein's strategy was designed to employ American air power to achieve his objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood and Journalistic Truthtelling Matthew .C Ehrlich
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 19 Article 9 Issue 2 Symposium on Media Ethics February 2014 Hollywood and Journalistic Truthtelling Matthew .C Ehrlich Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Matthew C. Ehrlich, Hollywood and Journalistic Truthtelling, 19 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 519 (2005). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol19/iss2/9 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOLLYWOOD AND JOURNALISTIC TRUTHTELLING MATTHEW C. EHRLICH* Movies are useful tools for thinking about professional behavior and ethics. For example, films about lawyers can "raise questions about the proper and possible role of law in society"1 while reflecting "powerful myths that influence our reactions to issues we meet in real life, including legal issues."2 The same applies to journalism. Media ethics professor Lee Wilkins notes that 'journalists are often called upon to make decisions based on a morally mature interpretation of principles rather than any specific code of conduct," and she says film gives dramatic life to struggles over those principles.' This article will look at what has been called the paramount principle of journalism-truthtelling-as it is depicted in a movie about a notorious real-life case of journalistic deception. Shattered Glass4 is the story of Stephen Glass, who in 1998 was fired for fabricating more than two dozen stories for the New Republic magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • SHATTERED GLASS Coming to Theaters November 2003
    SHATTERED GLASS Coming to Theaters November 2003 www.shatteredglassmovie.com Dear Educator: By the mid-1990’s, a series of highly acclaimed articles in The New Republic had made a likeable young staff writer named Stephen Glass one of America’s hottest journalists. Soon he was reeling in freelance assignments from such high-profile publications as Harper’s, George, and Rolling Stone. But in 1998, a strange turn of events sent Glass’ world crashing down around him when it became evident that many of his articles had been nothing more than figments of his own fertile imagination. Shattered Glass, a new film from Lions Gate Films, recreates the saga of Stephen Glass and his decep- tions, casting a bright spotlight on questions about the integrity of American journalism that still remain open for debate today. Written and directed by Billy Ray and starring Hayden Christensen, Peter Sarsgaard, Hank Azaria, Chloe Sevigny, Melanie Lynskey, Steve Zahn, and Rosario Dawson, Shattered Glass is scheduled to arrive in theaters November 2003. To help you bring the lessons of this powerful film into your classroom, we are pleased to provide this free study guide for Shattered Glass, developed in cooperation with Lions Gate Films and Yahoo! Search. The guide is designed for use with college and high school students as a supplement to courses in journalism, communications, civics, social studies, and tech- nology, offering activities that lay the groundwork for informed viewing when students see the film in theaters and for exploring critical issues through follow-up discussion in class. We encourage you to share this study guide with other faculty members at your school.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1 the Clinton Scandal Epidemic
    Notes Introduction 1. See ‘Figure 3-1. 1996 Presidential Election’, Michael Nelson, ‘The Election: Turbulence and Tranquillity in Contemporary American Politics’, in Michael Nelson (ed.), The Elections of 1996 (Washington D.C.: CQ Press, 1997) p. 61. 2. There are several interpretations of the plight faced by the modern presi- dency and the problems created and endured by the presidential office; see Burt Solomon, ‘Do We Ask Too Much of Presidents?’, National Journal, 18 June 1994, pp. 1390–92. 3. ‘19 August 1998. The Ratings: Good News for Networks’, NYTimes.com [http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/081998clinton-ratings.html] 4. ‘1 March 1998. Republicans Abandon Restraint on Clinton’, NYTimes.com [http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/030198clinton-repubs.html] 5. ‘19 August 1998. The Reaction: Prominent Democrats Are Unhappy With Clinton’, NYTimes.com [http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/081998 clinton-politics.html] Chapter 1 The Clinton Scandal Epidemic 1. See, ‘Clinton’s Latest, Worst Troubles Put His Whole Agenda on Hold’, Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 24 January 1998, pp. 164–5. 2. ‘27 January 1998. Hillary Clinton: “This is a battle” ’ CNN.com [http://www. cnn.com/US/9801/27/hillary.today] 3. Theodore Lowi, ‘Foreword’, in Andrei S. Markovits and Mark Silverstein, (eds), The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1988) p. viii. 4. Cited in ‘Watergate’s Clearest Lesson: Ten years later, the point remains: Not even a President is above the law’, Time, 14 June 1982, p. 36. 5. ‘25 January 1998. Other Presidents Have Been the Talk of the Pillow’, NYTimes.com [http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/012598clinton- history.html] 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Awards, Fellowships and Grants
    Awards, Fellowships and Grants The purpose of this report is to categorize domestic and international awards, fellowships and grants that are based, in part or in whole, on journalistic courage. The first part of the report organizes the awards, fellowships and grants according to various categories. The second part is a complete, annotated list of the awards, fellowships and grants. Awards with “courage” in the award’s title: Association for Women Journalists (AWJ) Courage Award1 Courage in Student Journalism Awards Daniel Pearl Award for Courage and Integrity in Journalism George Orwell Courage in Journalism Award International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF) Courage in Journalism Awards Indiana Journalism Courage Award The Kouchacji Award for Courage in Journalism Medill Medal for Courage in Journalism National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium (NAPALC) American Courage Award2 PEN Canada/Paul Kidd Courage Award The Ron Ridenhour Courage Award3 Awards that include “courage” as a criteria for the award: The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) International Press Freedom Awards Elijah Parish Lovejoy Award The George Polk Awards The Gish Award In Character Prize for Editorial and Opinion Writing About the Human Virtues John Aubuchon Freedom of the Press Awards4 The John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism 1 Courage Award nominees may include journalists and non-journalists. 2 The American Courage Award is awarded to “an individual, company or organization that has shown extraordinary courage or commitment to the cause of civil rights.” Recipients include journalists and non- journalists. 3 Given in honor of investigative journalist Ron Ridenhour, the award itself is “presented to an individual in recognition of his or her courageous and life-long defense of the public interest and passionate commitment to social justice” and does not exclude non-journalist candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush and Asia: a Midterm Assessment
    GEORGE W. BUSH AND ASIA: A MIDTERM ASSESSMENT Edited by Robert M. Hathaway and Wilson Lee | i | Asia Program GEORGE W. BUSH AND ASIA: A MIDTERM ASSESSMENT Essays by: Andrew J. Bacevich Kurt M. Campbell Nayan Chanda Catharin E. Dalpino Harry Harding Frank S. Jannuzi James A. Kelly Henry R. Nau Janne E. Nolan Jonathan D. Pollack Hilton L. Root Edited by: Robert M. Hathaway Wilson Lee ©2003 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Cover Photographs courtesy of the White House WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS LEE H. HAMILTON, DIRECTOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair; David A. Metzner, Vice Chair. Public Members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Roderick R. Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; Colin L. Powell, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Private Citizen Members: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Carol Cartwright, Donald E. Garcia, Bruce S. Gelb, Daniel L. Lamaute, Tamala L. Longaberger, Thomas R. Reedy WILSON COUNCIL Bruce S. Gelb, President. Diane Aboulafia-D'Jaen, Charles S. Ackerman, B.B. Andersen, Cyrus A. Ansary, Charles F. Barber, Lawrence E. Bathgate II, John Beinecke, Joseph C. Bell, Steven Alan Bennett, Rudy Boschwitz, A. Oakley Brooks, Melva Bucksbaum, Charles W. Burson, Conrad Cafritz, Nicola L. Caiola, Raoul L. Carroll, Scott Carter, Albert V. Casey, Mark Chandler, Peter B. Clark, Melvin Cohen, William T. Coleman, Jr., Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories and Past Lessons: Understanding US Decisions of Armed Humanitarian Intervention and Nonintervention in the Post-Cold War
    STORIES AND PAST LESSONS: UNDERSTANDING U.S. DECISIONS OF ARMED HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AND NONINTERVENTION IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Shannon Peterson, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Donald A. Sylvan, Adviser Approved by Professor Emeritus Chadwick F. Alger ________________________ Adviser Assistant Professor Ted G. Hopf Political Science Department ABSTRACT What factors appear influential to U.S. decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention? Utilizing the “story model” mode of problem representation first utilized by psychologists Pennington and Hastie (1986; 1988) and adapted to the domain of foreign policy by Sylvan and Charlick-Paley (2000), this research seeks to answer this question by exploring how top decision makers within the Bush and Clinton administrations collectively represented problems in Somalia, Rwanda and Bosnia in the early to mid-nineteen nineties. In particular, it explores whether decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention appear linked to: (1) the invocation of historical analogies, (2) perceptions of threats and or opportunities to vital national interests, (3) perceived moral/legal imperatives, (4) pressure and interests related to domestic actors, such as the Congress, the public and the media, (5) institutional pressures and interests pertaining to U.S. membership in international organizations or alliances, such as NATO and or the United Nations, (6) the perceived relative ease and utility of intervention, and (7) vested military interests. An analysis of the collective elite discourse and evolving representations (or “stories”) of each crisis reveals, among other things, that decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and ii nonintervention appear strongly linked to perceived pressure and interests pertaining to U.S.
    [Show full text]