Iom South Sudan June 2019 | Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iom South Sudan June 2019 | Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness Report IOM SOUTH SUDAN JUNE 2019 | EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE PREPAREDNESS REPORT Lakes COUNTIES RECEIVING HYGIENE PROMOTION SUPPORT IOM DTM FLOW MONITORING POINTS Wau Airport HEALTH FACILITIES SUPPORTED WITH IOM WASH INFRASTRUCTURE SOUTH SUDAN Dingimo CAR Source Yubu Nabia Pai Logobero DRC Lasu POINT OF ENTRY SITE MANAGEMENT Lutaya Yei Taxi Park Jale Aweno Olwiyo IOM Khor Kaya/ WHO CUAMM Elegu WORLD VISION Salia Musala PLANNED PoE SITES (TO BE MANAGED BY IOM) UGANDA CONFIRMED OR SUSPECTED EVD CASES Ariwara (DRC) TOTAL SUSPECTED/ NON-EVD FEVER NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REACHED INDIVIDUALS CONFIRMED EVD CASES DETECTED & HEALTH FACILITIES THROUGH HYGIENE SCREENED CASES REFERRED SUPPORTED PROMOTION 89,939 (In June 2019) 0 213 (In June 2019) 8 24,480 (In June 2019) 480,445 (Since Sept 2018) 1,056 (Since Sept 2018) 187,088 (Since Sept 2018) MONTHLY OVERVIEW WASH ● The EVD team erected tents in the 3 PoEs at Kaya, Bazi and Okaba so as to ● IOM repaired one hand pump at Kerwa PHCC in Kajo-Keji County to support complement the temporary shades that had previously been used as primary WASH IPC activities. This PHCC is located near to the Kerwa PoE, to which screening tents, but which had deteriorated due to harsh weather conditions suspected EVD patients are referred ● IOM continued to maintain 14 PoE shelters and support the PoE sites with HEALTH WASH facilities (temporary latrines and mobile handwashing stands) ● Screening is ongoing in 14 active IOM-supported PoE sites, namely: Yei airstrip, ● During the month of June, the EVD WASH Team completed the rehabilitation Yei SSRRC, Tokori, Lasu, Kaya, Bazi, Salia Musala, Okaba, Khor Kaya (along Busia of the incinerator at Kerwa and excavation of waste pits in 4 PoE sites (Okaba, Uganda Border) in Morobo County, Pure, Kerwa, Khorijo, Birigo in Lainya County Kerwa, Bori and Bazi) so as to improve solid waste management as part of IPC/ and Bori WASH EVD preparedness activities ● School hygiene club training was completed at the Yei junior primary school for 14 DTM members (8 boys and 6 girls), who will then become advocates of good hygiene ● IOM continued to survey travelers on arrival from countries affected by EVD or practices within the school at risk of EVD transmission at 21 FMPs along the borders with the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and the Central African Republic and at key mobility ● A community engagement focus group discussion was conducted in Lasu reaching hubs in Yei Town. Six of these FMPs are operated in cooperation with IOM a total of 50 individuals (18 females, 19 males, 4 boys, and 2 girls) Uganda on the Ugandan side of the border PROGRAMME UPDATES HEALTH Individuals Screened for EVD at PoE Sites Locations with PoE Bazi Birigo Bori Kaya Kerwa Khorijo Khor Kaya Lasu Okaba Pure Salia Musala Tokori Yei Airport Yei SSRRC Individuals screened this month 7,214 5,016 3,877 13,503 10,056 10,254 12,907 256 7,086 8,594 11,490 280 90 126 Cumulative 36,792 5,034 screened 18,140 6,785 106,945 30,924 69,038 41,282 1,082 47,498 68,021 47,163 888 853 Number of months 6 3 2 10 3 7 4 3 9 7 5 8 10 10 operational In June, 89,939 inbound travelers to South Sudan were screened for EVD symptoms and exposure at the 14 IOM-supported PoE screening sites in Yei River State. A total of 213 travelers were recorded to have non-EVD fever cases and all were subsequently referred to the nearest health facility of the respective PoEs for further assessment and with the majority of cases diagnosed and treated for malaria (67.6%) and pneumonia in children (19.7%). Since the start of EVD screening activities in September 2018, IOM has cumulatively screened a total of 480,445 individuals for EVD symptoms. No alert cases have been reported so far. 105,018 1000 100,000 Cases of Non-EVD1000 Fever 89,939 105,018 (Values Indicated for Total Monthly Cases) 100,000 800 89,927 80,000 75,871 Total Individuals800 Screened for EVD Since 80,000 75,871 September 2018 600 60,000 57,167 600 43,835 44,284 60,000 57,167 400 40,000 33,184 43,835 44,284 230 400 213 40,000 18,395 157 200 33,184 20,000 12,134 116 116 122 54 230 213 48 18,395 618 0 157 200 0 0 20,000 12,134 116 116 122 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE 54 48 September October November December January February March April May June 618 0 2018 2019 0 0 September October November December January February March April WASHMay June 94 Moyo, Uganda During the reporting period, IOM continued hygiene promotion activities in and around all 16 locations (Yei SSRRC screening point, Pure, Morobo, Khorijo, Kaya, Gimunu, Tokori , Marakonye, Lasu, Attende, Salia-Musala, Busia (Kor-Kaya), Kerwa, Bori, Bazi, and Berigo). Hygiene promotion sessions continued at schools, markets and water points, reaching approximately 24,480 individuals (8,865 women, 7,295 men , 3,859 boys and 4,461 girls). DTM Origin of Entrants to South Sudan IOM continued surveying people on arrival to South Sudan Country & Locations Number of Individuals Surveyed Trends Compared from Uganda, DRC and CAR at 21 Flow Monitoring Points, of Origin This Month to Previous Month including six operated in cooperation with IOM Uganda. UGA Koboko 10,280 39.9% Based on data submitted by Monday 1 July, a total of 25,746 COD Ituri 6,000 23.3% individuals were surveyed in June on arrival to South Sudan, COD Other 1722 6.7% down from 31,787 in May. The main regions of departure UGA Moyo 1463 5.7% were Koboko in Uganda (39.9% of respondents) and Ituri UGA Yumbe 1332 5.2% in the DRC (23.3%), while the main reported counties of UGA Other 1320 5.1% destination were Morobo (61.9%), Yei (8.3%) and Kajo-Keji UGA Kampala 660 2.6% (7.3%). UGA Arua 620 2.4% UGA Maracha 489 1.9% Most respondents reported South Sudanese nationality KEN Other 475 1.8% (87.5%), followed by Ugandan (7.4%). Economic reasons UGA Adjumani 377 1.5% (30.3% of respondents) and access to healthcare (15.9% of CAF Haut-Mbomou 358 1.4% respondents) were the main reported reasons for travel. UGA Lamwo 328 1.3% 71.8% of respondents reported an intended duration of COD Kongo Central 312 1.2% stay in South Sudan of under one week. OTHER Other 10 0.0% Operational factors, including delayed submission by some FMPs, may affect trends on a week-by-week basis. Figures with; upward trend, downward trend, no change, no data from previous week. For a more detailed breakdown, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENTS AND OUTCOMES DTM IOM participated in two joint humanitarian assessments, the first in Kajo-Keji and the second in Tore and Rasul (Yei County). The findings from Kajo-Keji, which indicated a significant increase in returns, as well as a need for health services and a potential new PoE screening location (Jalimo), were presented to the BH&POE technical working group. The assessment in Tore and Rasul revealed two points of entry from DRC, though incoming flows were reported to be low (<50 per week) due to the lack of sizeable settlements on the DRC side of the border. WASH/HEALTH ● IOM conducted an assessment visit to Tore and Rasul in Yei as part of an interagency assessment mission in these areas ● On 19 June 2019, IOM held a meeting with the Yei River Handwashing demonstration in Yei © IOM 2019 / Collins YONGULE State Minister of Health and Environment, The DG Yei River State Ministry of Health, WHO representatives from the state, other partners, and the Commissioner for Morobo county at Morobo County Commissioner’s office ● IOM EVD coordinators from Juba and Yei conducted monitoring visits to PoE sites in Morobo county (Salia Musalla, Kaya, Morobo and Bazi) and held meetings with ground teams to maintain direct feedback from field teams ● IOM and UNICEF are conducting a joint EVD assessment visit to Tore county in Yei River state form 1st July to 5th July 2019 COORDINATION NOTES IOM continues to actively participate in the national level coordination meetings, such as SAG, NTF and TWG meetings, as well as the IPC/WASH, Border Health and Points of Entry (BH &PoE), Epi & Surveillance, Risk Communications Social Mobilization and Access and Security Technical Working Groups (TWGs). IOM also attends weekly Yei STF meetings as well as the monthly coordination meetings in Morobo and Kajo-Keji counties. IOM conducts regular monitoring and supportive supervision at all of the PoE sites. SECURITY & ACCESS ISSUES PLANS FOR JULY ● Continue the health and hygiene promotion activities in HEALTH areas around the PoEs Remote monitoring is done for Lasu and Tokori PoE sites due to security/ ● Continue with establishment of the medical waste access issues. Poor mobile network makes communication with the team management system at PHCCs close to existing PoEs on the ground more challenging. ● Continue to assess other locations for possible PoE screening DTM site establishment Security constraints and poor telecommunications infrastructure affected ● DTM plans to continue monitoring population movements the ability of some FMPs to submit data on time on a weekly basis. from DRC, Uganda and CAR into South Sudan paying DTM planned to re-activate three FMPs in Juba to better monitor long- special attention to flows from EVD affected areas. Through distance flows from countries at risk of EVD transmission.
Recommended publications
  • Urban Displacement and Vulnerability in Yei, South Sudan
    Sanctuary in the city? Urban displacement and vulnerability in Yei, South Sudan Ellen Martin and Nina Sluga HPG Working Paper December 2011 Overseas Development Institute 111 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD United Kingdom Tel: +44(0) 20 7922 0300 Fax: +44(0) 20 7922 0399 Website: www.odi.org.uk/hpg Email: [email protected] hpg Humanitarian Policy Group 134355_Sanctuary in the City - YEI Cover 1_OUTER 134355_Sanctuary intheCity-YEICover1_INNER About the authors Ellen Martin is a Research Officer in the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG). Nina Sluga was Country Analyst (CAR, Chad, Congo, Sudan and South Sudan) for the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) at the time of writing of this report. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the staff of NRC in Juba and Yei for their logistical support during the planning of this study, and staff in the GIZ office in Yei for sharing their baseline studies. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the many people who contributed in numerous ways to the study, including research support and the provision of documents and materials and reviewing drafts. Particular thanks to Simon Russell (UNHRC), Charles Mballa (UNHCR), Gregory Norton (IDMC), Nina Birkeland (IDMC), Marzia Montemurro (IDMC) and Sara Pantuliano (HPG). Wendy Fenton (HPN) provided extremely valuable input into the initial draft. Thanks too to Matthew Foley for his expert editing of the report. Finally, we are especially grateful to the many people in Yei who generously gave their time to take part in this study. This study was carried out in collaboration with the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Mobility Mapping (Pmm) South Sudan: Ebola Virus Disease (Evd) Preparedness
    POPULATION MOBILITY MAPPING (PMM) SOUTH SUDAN: EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE (EVD) PREPAREDNESS CONTEXT The 10th EVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is still ongoing, with a total of 3,428 EVD cases reported as of 2 February 2020, including 3,305 confirmed and 118 probable cases. A total of 2,250 deaths have been reported, with a case fatality ratio (CFR) of 65.6%. Although the rate of new cases in DRC has decreased and stabilized, two health zones reported 25 new confirmed cases within the 21-day period from 13 January to 2 February 2019: Beni (n=18) and Mabalako (n=30).1 The EVD outbreak in DRC is the 2nd largest in history and is affecting the north-eastern provinces of the country, which border Uganda, Rwanda and South Sudan. South Sudan, labeled a 'priority 1' preparedness country, has continued to scale up preparedeness efforts since the outbreak was confirmed in Kasese district in South Western Uganda on 11 June 2019 and in Ariwara, DRC (70km from the South Sudan border) on 30 June 2019. South Sudan remains at risk while there is active transmission in DRC, due to cross-border population movements and a weak health system. To support South Sudan’s Ministry of Health and other partners in their planning for EVD preparedness, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has applied its Population Mobility Mapping (PMM) approach to inform the prioritization of locations for preparedness activities. Aim and Objectives The aim of PMM in South Sudan is to inform the 2020 EVD National Preparedness Plan by providing partners with relevant information on population mobility and cross-border movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Boating on the Nile
    United Nations Mission September 2010 InSUDAN Boating on the Nile Published by UNMIS Public Information Office INSIDE 8 August: Meeting with Minister of Humanitarian Affairs Mutrif Siddiq, Joint Special Representative for Darfur 3 Special Focus: Transport Ibrahim Gambari expressed regrets on behalf of the • On every corner Diary African Union-UN Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) over • Boating on the Nile recent events in Kalma and Hamadiya internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in • Once a lifeline South Darfur and their possible negative impacts on the future of the peace process. • Keeping roads open • Filling southern skies 9 August: Blue Nile State members of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and National Congress Party (NCP) formed a six-member parliamentary committee charged with raising awareness about popular consultations on Comprehensive Peace Agreement 10 Photo gallery implementation in the state. The Sufi way 10 August: The SPLM and NCP began pre-referendum talks on wealth and power-sharing, 12 Profile demarcating the border, defining citizenship and sharing the Nile waters in preparation for the Knowledge as food southern self-determination vote, scheduled for 9 January 2011. 14 August: Two Jordanian police advisors with UNAMID were abducted in Nyala, Southern Darfur, 13 Environment as they were walking to a UNAMID transport dispatch point 100 meters from their residence. Reclaiming the trees Three days later the two police advisors were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur. 14 Communications 16 August: Members of the Southern Sudan Human Rights Commission elected a nine-member The voice of Miraya steering committee to oversee its activities as the region approaches the self-determination referendum three days later the two police advisor were released unharmed in Kass, Southern Darfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Assessment Survey Morobo County
    Village Assessment Survey COUNTY ATLAS 2013 Morobo County Central Equatoria State Village Assessment Survey The Village Assessment Survey (VAS) has been used by IOM since 2007 and is a comprehensive data source for South Sudan that provides detailed information on access to basic services, infra- structure and other key indicators essential to informing the development of efficient reintegra- tion programmes. The most recent VAS represents IOM’s largest effort to date encompassing 30 priority counties comprising of 871 bomas, 197 payams, 468 health facilities, and 1,277 primary schools. There was a particular emphasis on assessing payams outside state capitals, where com- paratively fewer comprehensive assessments have been carried out. IOM conducted the assess- ment in priority counties where an estimated 72% of the returnee population (based on esti- mates as of 2012) has resettled. The county atlas provides spatial data at the boma level and should be used in conjunction with the VAS county profile. Four (4) Counties Assessed Planning Map and Dashboard..…………Page 1 WASH Section…………..………...Page 14 - 20 General Section…………...……...Page 2 - 5 Natural Source of Water……...……….…..Page 14 Main Ethnicities and Languages.………...Page 2 Water Point and Physical Accessibility….…Page 15 Infrastructure and Services……...............Page 3 Water Management & Conflict....….………Page 16 Land Ownership and Settlement Type ….Page 4 WASH Education...….……………….…….Page 17 Returnee Land Allocation Status..……...Page 5 Latrine Type and Use...………....………….Page 18 Livelihood
    [Show full text]
  • Tables from the 5Th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008
    Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 CENSU OR S,S F TA RE T T IS N T E IC C S N A N A 123 D D β U E S V A N L R ∑σ µ U E A H T T I O U N O S S S C C S E Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 ii Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... x Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ xv Background and Mandate of the Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE) ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 History of Census-taking in Southern Sudan....................................................................... 2 Questionnaire Content, Sampling and Methodology ............................................................ 2 Implementation .............................................................................................................. 2
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Equatorial / Morobo County, (Payams of Gulumbi and Kimba) Alert Date* (First Time the Location
    Shelter Cluster South Sudan sheltersouthsudan.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter SHELTER/NFI ANALYSIS REPORT Field with (*) and italicized questions are mandatory. For checkboxes (☒), tick all that apply. Use charts from mobile data collection (MDC) wherever possible. 1. General Information Location* (State/County/Payam/Boma) Central Equatorial / Morobo County, (Payams of Gulumbi and Kimba) Alert Date* (first time the location mentioned to the Cluster) Analysis Dates* From 8th/11/2019 to 22nd /11/2019 2. Location Information Report Date* (date completed) GPS Coordinates* Kimba: Latitude N. 3°35’24.9’’ Longitude: E. 30° 48’26.8 Gulumbi : Latitude N. 3°40’ 43.2” Longitude: E. 30° 46’ 29.8” 3. Team Details* Name Organisation Title Contacts: Email/Mobile/Sat Phone Malish Lawrence SPEDP ES/NFI OFFICER (Team Leader) +211925460589, +211917049021 [email protected] Abiggo Manson Lubang SPEDP ES/NFI Officer [email protected] +211926088035/+256786387499 Aligo Daniel SPEDP Protection Officer [email protected] +25789435834 Apai Jackie SPEDP Protection Officer [email protected] +256779986856 If this is a joint mission, what %s will each partner report? [SPEDP 1]:100% [Partner 2]: ___% [Partner 3]: ___% SPEDPconducted the needs analysis 4. Desk Research: Displacement, Movement, and Conflict Trends What information did you find about the context and trends in this location more than six months ago? What triggered the analysis? Based on number of IRNA reports, UN OCHA report and independent need analysis done by SPEDP, and other agencies in Morobo County showed that with the signing of the revitalized Peace agreement, there is very high influx of returnees from Uganda and the democratic Republic of Congo into Morobo County right from Kaya the border which is in Kimba Payam and most of the Payams including Gulumbi Payam that has been covered in this household needs analysis report.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 7 Background of the Landmine Impact Survey .......................................................................................... 16 Survey Results and Findings Scope of the Landmine Problem............................................................................................................. 21 Analysis of Economic Blockage Impacts................................................................................................. 41 Retrofit Results ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Past Mine Action .................................................................................................................................... 45 Profiles by State Blue Nile ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Central Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 57 Eastern Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 65 Gadaref.................................................................................................................................................. 71 Jonglei
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Deployment Plan Template
    Country: Republic of South Sudan Index Facility Address States County Facility Name Type of HF Closest Town / City number (Payam) 1 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Nyori Moridi PHCU PHCU Moridi 2 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Reggo Makamagor PHCU PHCU Makamagor 3 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Tali Payam Mijiki PHCU PHCU Mijiki 4 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Nyori Kuda PHCU PHCU Kuda 5 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Rijiong Jonko PHCU PHCU Jonkok 6 Central Equatoria State Terekeka Terekeka Terekeka PHCC PHCC Terekeka 7 Central Equatoria State Juba Rokon Miriko PHCU PHCU Rokon 8 Central Equatoria State Juba Ganji Ganji PHCC PHCC Ganji 9 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Tore PHCC PHCC Yei 10 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Goli PHCU PHCU Yei 11 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei Pakula PHCU PHCU Yei 12 Central Equatoria State Yei Mugwo Jombu PHCU PHCU Yei 13 Central Equatoria State Yei Tore Bandame PHCU PHCU Yei 14 Central Equatoria State Yei Otogo Kejiko PHCU PHCU Yei 15 Central Equatoria State Yei Lasu Kirikwa PHCU PHCU Yei 16 Central Equatoria State Yei Otogo Rubeke PHCU PHCU Yei 17 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei BAKITA PHCC PHCC YEI 18 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei Marther PHCC PHCC YEI 19 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei EPC CLINIC - PHCU PHCU YEI 20 Central Equatoria State Yei Yei YEI HOSPITAL HOSPITAL YEI 21 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County Cold Chain YEI 22 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County Cold Chain YEI 23 Central Equatoria State Yei CHD Yei County Cold Chain County
    [Show full text]
  • E4220v2 Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry
    E4220v2 Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry Public Disclosure Authorized EMERGENCY FOOD CRISIS RESPONSE PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT May 2013 Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND THE STUDY 5 2. AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN SOUTH SUDAN 14 3. REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT POLICIES, LAWS AND REGULATIONS 19 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH 26 6. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE 48 7. PEST MANAGEMENT 52 8. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 55 9. ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN 60 10. SUMMARY OF THE STUDY 66 11. REFERENCES 69 ii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAHI Action Africa Help International CES Central Equatoria State CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement EA Environmental Assessment EFCRP Emergency Food Crisis and Response Project ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESAF Environment and Social Assessment Framework ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environment and Social Management Framework ESMP Environment and Social Management Plan FAO Food and Agriculture Organization GDP Gross Domestic Product GFRP Global Food Crisis Response Program GNI Gross National Income GoSS Government of Southern Sudan IPM Integrated Pest Management IPMF Integrated Pest Management Framework IPMP Integrated Peoples Management
    [Show full text]
  • Public Private Cooperation Fragile States
    Public Private Cooperation Fragile States Annexe F to the Field study report South Sudan As part of the Country Study South Sudan Working group: Public Private Cooperation in Fragile States July 2009 1 Supplementary Document (annex F) to the Field Research Report on Public Private Cooperation opportunities in Southern Sudan, Nov 2009 by Irma Specht & Mark van Dorp (main researchers) and Washington Okeyo, Marjolein C. Groot and John Penn de Ngong 1. Specific (sub) sectors in more detail This annex provides, in more detail, the ongoing and potential sectors relevant for economic development and PPC in South Sudan. These are details found during the field research and are to complement the overview provided in the overall report. Oil and mineral production The most important economic activity in Southern Sudan is oil production, which is currently taking place in the oil rich regions of Upper Nile, Abyei and Unity State. Oil was discovered in Sudan in the mid-1970s, but production did not start until 1999. The pioneer companies Chevron and Shell were forced to leave in 1984, after the outbreak of civil war. They eventually sold their rights in 1990, booking a $1 billion loss. Major players that have controlled the oil industry in Sudan since the mid-nineties include the Chinese National Petroleum Company (CNPC) and Petronas Caligary from Malaysia, Lundin Petroleum from Sweden and ONGC Videsh from India. While, at a global level, Sudan is a minor oil exporting country, China, India and Malaysia have invested billions of dollars in the country, including outside the oil industry. They consider their relations with the country not only as economic, but also geostrategic and energy-strategic successes that are worth defending.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)
    FY 2015 South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for South Sudan. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” South Sudan Country/Regional Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2015 Strategic Direction Summary August 27, 2015 Table of Contents Goal Statement 1.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 1.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 1.2 Investment profile 1.3 Sustainability Profile 1.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 1.5 Stakeholder engagement
    [Show full text]