CHAPTER ONE Introductory Matters

Being a sacred document of faith and socio-religious history, the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible1 has been subjected to various scholarly investigations since the dawn of the modern era. At the on-set, Old Testa- ment study was dominated by the quest for a theological understanding of the Hebrew Bible. This earliest orthodox confessional approach made no distinction between biblical theology and dogmatic theology or between Old Testament theology and New Testament theology. Old Testament theology as a discipline in the modern sense is just about two centuries old. As Ralph Smith notes, many Old Testament scholars ascribe its foundation to an eighteenth-century rationalist, Johann Philipp Gabler, who attributed the confusion in the Christian world to “an improper use of the Bible” and lack of distinction “between dogmatic theology and the simple historical religion of the Bible.” Through his March 30, 1787, inaugural speech at the Univer- sity of Altdorf, he thus “called for a separation of dogmatic and biblical theology,” and hence “he is often called the father of biblical theology.”2 Gabler’s call was in response to a demand for what was termed “biblical theology” since about the mid-seventeenth century—a critical trend which resulted from the insufficiency of and danger posed by the Protestant Reformation principle of sola scriptura with regard to the method of doing theology. Of course, neither Gabler nor the Reformers did originate the phrase “biblical theology.” He rather employed and described this concept as a “historical discipline” to be distinguished from dogmatic theology, while he articulated the purpose and a three-stage method of a theology which, ironically in years to come, would also be called “biblical theology.”3 In the quest for a proper frame of reference, however, several generations of scholars after Gabler have raised a dense cloud of semantic debates over the term “biblical theology.”4 Beginning with the Renaissance through the Protestant Reformation, the historical-critical approach was gradually applied to Old Testament study. During the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, this method became full- fledged from Germany to the Western world with a sharp departure from the orthodox approach. Regardless of noticeable Jewish and Christian hostility to this departure, a dialogue was introduced between the two approaches (the traditional theological and the historical studies of the Hebrew Bible) during

2 CHAPTER ONE the world-wars era.5 This synthetic approach resulted in the formation of the so-called “biblical theology movement”6 and the emergence of the neo- critical era. With its sole preoccupation with the literary rather than the theological nature of biblical texts, the New Criticism further became a threat to the discipline of biblical theology.7 Since the thirties, Old Testament theology has witnessed a gradual shift from methodological preoccupations to concerns for the meaning or message of the Old Testament. This shift was accelerated in some significant ways by the inception of the biblical theology movement. First, the movement introduced a radical way of doing theology, which served (in my evaluation) as a kind of “back-to-the-Bible” track for those who, in search for a way better than the earlier approaches, seemingly have strayed from doing true biblical theology. Second, the relationship between biblical studies and biblical theology became heightened through the numerous literature produced by the movement’s adherents. Brevard Childs sketches five common concerns of the biblical theology movement as: the attempt “to recover a theological dimension” or “to penetrate the heart of the Bible,” to study the Bible as a unified whole, the divine revelation as historical, the biblical thought as distinctive, and the biblical faith as uniquely outstanding in its ancient Near Eastern setting. Although this seeming consensus gradually suffered a breakdown due to both internal and external pressures which eventually killed the movement itself, Childs asserts that the need for doing biblical theology remains a challenge to biblical scholars.8 Thus, scholars have made various attempts to construct or structure Old Testament theologies. One of such efforts has been the quest for a center or an overarching theme of Old Testament theology. Some examples of these thematic approaches include the following. Walther Eichrodt uses the covenant idea as central to all faith statements in the Old Testament.9 Gerhard von Rad focuses on the concept of salvation history based on the great acts of Yah- weh.10 To Walther Zimmerli, “the thematic significance of the first commandment,” that is, “obedience to Yahweh, the one God, who delivered Israel out of slavery and is jealous of his own uniqueness, defines the fundamental nature of the Old Testament faith.”11 Samuel Terrien develops his study around the theme of the “presence of God.”12 Walter Kaiser sees the theme of “promise” as the backdrop of Old Testament theology.13 Disputing the idea of “the center of the Old Testament,” Claus Westermann calls for doing Old Testament theology via the original tripartite nature of the Old Testament―the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings, since “the structure of an Old Testament theology must be based on events rather than concepts.”14 Using Exod. 5:22–6:8 as his own premise, Elmer Martens as CHAPTER ONE 3 well argues for “God’s design” as the central theme of Old Testament theology.15

Challenges and Purpose of the Study Some other scholarly advancements have been made beyond the quest for a central theme in Old Testament theology. One of such recent and current trends in biblical theology is the treatment of a single theme throughout the Old Testament or the entire Bible. The “Overtures to Biblical Theology” series is notable in this respect. Some examples of single biblical themes already investigated in this series include: blessing (Claus Wester- mann, 1968/1978), land (Walter Brueggemann, 1977), death (Lloyd Bailey, 1979), suffering of God (Terence Fretheim, 1984), power (J. P. M. Walsh, 1987), holiness (John Gammie, 1989), and prayer (Samuel Balentine, 1993).16 The attempt at developing single themes has begun to spread beyond the borders of biblical theology since the past three decades. Building on the foundations laid by the nineteenth-century classic sociologists like Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, who introduced an inter-disciplinary dialogue between religion (theology) and sociology, and those of W. Robertson Smith (1889), Herman Gunkel (1917), Alfred Bertholet (1919), Johannes Pedersen (1920), and Gustaf Dalman (1928–29), who “pioneered the use of anthropology in biblical interpretation,”17 modern scholars also have attempted a similar dialogue between religion (theology) and gerontology. The responses of biblical scholars to this challenge of inter-disciplinary study of aging and old age have come in forms of articles, essays, and books. The earliest of such works addressed the theme of “elders.” In 1895, Otto Seesemann completed his pioneer study (a doctoral dissertation) at Leipzig on “Die Ältesten im Alten Testament” (“The Elders in the Old Testament”), which evaluates the role of ancient Israelite elders mainly as family/clan chiefs or judges. He structures his research after one of the early traditional patterns of Old Testament studies, covering “der Hexateuch,” “die historischen Bücher,” “die Propheten,” and “die Ketubim.” He introduces his work with the argument that no separate proof is needed besides the projection in his broadly means “old (advanced) in years” (“alt an זָקֵן study that the Hebrew Jahren”), a social status characterized as “respected and superior” (“angese- hen und vornehm”). He notes that, on the basis of their superiority (“Vornehme”) and authority (“Behörde”), elders were acknowledged as natural advocates or representatives in the pre-monarchical Israel. He further observes that, as the Hebrew settlements in Canaan grew from individual villages to stable cities, however, the leadership authority and appearance of 4 CHAPTER ONE the ancient Israelite elders dwindled. Whether and to what extent the Ca- naanite-Phoenician influx partook of this change in social order cannot be determined. Apart from the apparent urbanization, Seesemann stresses that the monarchy was largely responsible for the relegation of the elders. No wonder, with the continuing cessation of the monarchy during the post-exilic era, he concludes, ancient Israelite elders regained their traditional social status as highest authorities over the Jewish communities (“als oberste Behörde an der Spitze der jüdischen Gemeinde”).18 Between the early fifties and early sixties (more than fifty years after Seesemann’s epochal research), a cluster of studies on the theme of “elders” also appeared. In 1950, H. Duesberg issued his article on “Old Men Accord- ing to the Old Testament.” In his opinion, God sets death in old age as a farewell to a happy life (“la mort est l’adieu à la vie heureuse,” p. 262) and as a reminder (“mort et rappelle,” p. 241) that human life is not endless (“non avec l’éternité,” p. 238). He also observes that regardless of physical discomforts of old age, the aged (“vieux”) are accorded honor for their wisdom (“sagesse”), which is rarely found among the youth (“jeunes,” pp. 244ff.).19 While John McKenzie (1959), Jean van der Ploeg (1961), and G. Henton Davies (1962) employ this theme also under the common title of “The Elders in the Old Testament,” Jan Dus (1960) and Horstklaus Berg (1961) title their works: “Die ‘Ältesten Israels’.” McKenzie also expresses the view that the elders were downgraded by various Israelite monarchs, and thus their authority as family chiefs eroded. After highlighting their functions, he compares them with elders of other ancient Near Eastern cultures. With no effort to identify the Hebrew term rendered “elder,” he begins his study with a list of various uses of “elder,” omitting the passages in which the term specifically means “old age.” McKenzie’s conclusion is that “in all but a few instances, the elders in the OT appear as a distinct social grade or collegiate body with certain political and religious functions, and not merely as ‘old men’.”20 Dus and Berg also respectively analyze the social status and functions of the elders in the ancient Israelite society. They as well note the traditional honor accorded “the elders” for their age and their social roles mainly as family chiefs and tribal judicial leaders and advisers.21 .זָקֵן ,Van der Ploeg holds a contrary opinion regarding the Hebrew term He traces various uses of the word throughout the Hebrew Bible and concludes that the term generally signifies “old” (“vieux”) or “old man” (“vieillard”). Not only that, he also notes a clear connection between old age and wisdom in these writings. He does not dispute the fact about the suppression of the elders’ power during the monarchical era. However, he argues like Seesemann that the elders regained their governing authority as esteemed CHAPTER ONE 5 chiefs, counselors, and judges on the basis of the law following the demise of the monarchy, but he differs in suggesting the time to be near the exilic (“après l’exil?”) period.22 In his own overview of the term “elders,” Davies suggests an “implied” relationship “between the elderly, the elders, and the wise” in ancient Israel. He also differs in his assessment of the function of the elders, concluding that “it is also clear that the elders exercised a continuing role in Israel’s life . . . . Elders are thus represented as a constant feature of Israel’s life from the days of Moses to those of Ezra, and they were as prominent under the monarchy as before it.”23 Expressing a view quite similar to Davies’, W. S. Roeroe as well argues in his 1976 dissertation: “Die Ältestenamt im Alten Testament” (“The Office of the Elders in the Old Testament”), that ancient Israel’s elders maintained their pre-monarchic local roles and even added on new functions as state officials during the monarchic era. He cites certain deuteronomistic and prophetic writings in support of his argument.24 Reviv’s work, The Elders in Ancient Israel, which first appeared in He- brew in 1983 and was translated into English six years later, becomes the first published monograph devoted to the study of that ancient Israelite social institution. By its title, the book seems to have promised more than it actually delivers. On the whole, Reviv fails to give proper and adequate treatment to relevant and vital biblical texts themselves. Instead, he devotes considerable space and time to other ancient Near Eastern texts and uses these as his yardsticks for analyzing the status and role of ancient Israelite elders.25 The essay by Ed Glasscock in 1987: “The Biblical Concept of Elder,” also betrays its title. By its structure and contents, it is clear that Glasscock’s primary concern is with the New Testament and not with the “biblical” concept of elder in reality. More so, he includes only two Old Testament passages among about 23 citations found in the study.26 In his own published dissertation in 1988, Joachim Buchholz treats the theme of “elders” with a preoccupation with the exilic period. Using the book of Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic History (whose literary development he sets in the exilic era) as basis, he argues that the elders’ somewhat significant pre-exilic roles diminished during the exile and their presence became even functionally insignificant at the return of the exiles to Judah.27 Another doctoral dissertation on the subject of “elders” was completed in 1990 at Harvard University by Timothy Willis. He employs an inter- disciplinary method (combining cultural anthropology with traditional biblical hermeneutics) in his study. He also draws cross-cultural comparisons from African and Middle Eastern societies. The first part of this work is devoted to an overview of pre-monarchical and monarchical Israel. Here, 6 CHAPTER ONE

Willis observes how ancient Israel was transformed from a tribal or segmen- tary lineage society to a monarchy or political state around 1000 B. C. E. Biblical passages which refer to “elders” in the pre-exilic Israelite history are evaluated in the second part of this work. Willis now identifies three groups of elders that functioned in pre-exilic Israel as city elders, tribal elders and “royal elders” (“senior officials in the royal court”). He also notices that early Israelite elders had leadership power and authority which dwindled as ancient Israel’s monarchs usurped their social position. Of course, he adds that the traditional clan elders continued on the local level to preserve tribal solidarity, while a few senior members in the royal court were revered as “elders” in lieu of their superior experience and wisdom. In a thematic research of this magnitude (361 pages), one would normally have expected that more attention would be given to the semantic aspect of the pivotal term (“elders”) beyond the three sentences which Willis allotted to it. In his observations on the characteristics and functions of the various groups of elders, however, he makes several references to “experience and wisdom” as their most prized outstanding attribute.28 The first known work to address the biblical theme of aging and old age is a forty-seven-page book issued in German in 1926. The main focus of this four-chapter concise study by Lorenz Dürr is the span or estimation of life in the Old Testament world. First, Dürr examines the span of life in the Old Testament in general. Here, he observes that a life blessed of Yahweh generally reaches advanced years, as depicted in the expressions such as dying “in a good old age” and “old and full of days/years” (Gen. 25:8; 35:29; Judg. 8:32; I Chron. 29:28; Job 42:17). Second, he evaluates the blessing of the fourth commandment (Exod. 20:12; Deut. 5:16) regarding seeing longevity of days in the “Promised Land,” as younger generations fulfill their filial responsibility of honoring their aged parents. Dürr devotes his third chapter to highlighting the euphemisms used for dying (“sterben”) in the ancient Near Eastern writings. Some of these expressions in the Hebrew Bible include: going the way of the world, lying with one’s fathers, and which are contrary to the common expressions ,( ְ שׁאוֹל) going down to the pit in both the Akkadian and Egyptian texts, such as one going or being gathered to his/her destiny yonder, when the buyer is killed, one reaching his/her peak, and one stepping into his/her horizon (especially kings). In the concluding chapter, he addresses the overcoming of the Old Testament life’s ideal, wherein the myth of death and grave (“Tod und Grab”) is transposed by the honor in death accorded to Yahweh’s righteous ones (“Frommen,” Ps. 116:15). Dürr’s study also includes a noteworthy observation on the connection between wisdom and advanced years in the Old Testament. He states CHAPTER ONE 7 that the intellectual vigor (“geistigen Frische”) and instruction (“Ver- fügung”) concerning life’s wisdom-product resides fully in a radiant old age (“sonniges Alter”), which is guarded by God’s grace. Men of such age earn the respect of young people (“der Jugend”), for being full of peaceful instruction (“ruhiger Weisung”) for the inexperienced (“die Unerfahrenen”) and soothing words for the injured lives. “That is the ideal goal (‘das Idealziel’) of the Old Testament life of wisdom (‘Lebensweisheit’),” Dürr concludes.29 Nearly five decades also elapsed following Dürr’s work before further significant studies were conducted on aging and old age. The seventies in particular saw very few works on this theme, one of which however proves to be the first extensive investigation of the social functions of old age in the ancient world. That work was also originally a doctoral dissertation completed at the University of München in 1973, which E. J. Brill has published under the same title in two volumes in 1980 and 1985 respectively. Eckhard von Nordheim titles his meticulous research: “Die Lehre der Alten” (“The Teaching of the Aged”) in which he employs the form-critical method to explore the theme of “testament” as a literary Gattung in both the canonical and extra-canonical Hebrew writings as well as in the writings of ancient Israel’s neighbors. The first volume addresses “The Testament as a Literary Genre in the Judaism of the Graeco-Roman Era,” focusing particularly on the testamentary literature such as the testaments of the twelve patriarchs and others. In the second volume, von Nordheim examines “The Testament as a Literary Genre in the Old Testament and the Ancient Near East.” Here he evaluates key texts from four different types of literature: a) the Old Testa- ment texts (namely, I Chron. 2; Gen. 49–50; Deut. 31–34; and Josh. 23–24), b) the Old Testament Apocryphal texts (namely, I Macc. 2:49–70; Tob. 4:1– 21 and 14:3–11), c) the Mesopotamian texts (namely, the “Teaching of Suruppak” and the “Speech of Achikar”), and d) the Egyptian texts (namely, the Teachings of Ptahhotep, Anchscheschonki and King Amenemhet I). On the whole, von Nordheim discovers a notable variability in the uses of the form “testament” in these writings. He locates the Sitz im Leben of the Gattung in the ancient Israelite wisdom and in the Mesopotamian and Egyptian cults respectively. More so, he sees “testaments” as a medium whereby individual aged persons, out of their whole wealth of life’s practical experiences (“der gesammelte Schatz der Erfahrungen der Alten”) and more especially at their death beds, transmit their final legacies (wisdom instructions and blessings) to their children (younger generations).30 In 1976, Lothar Ruppert explored “Der alte Mensch aus der Sicht des Alten Testamentes” (“The Old Human Being in the View of the Old Testa- 8 CHAPTER ONE ment”). He discovers that old age was considered an important segment of life in ancient Israel. The wisdom of old age or older people is attested and highly esteemed throughout the Old Testament and more especially in the Wisdom Literature. However, old-age burdens of senile infirmity and stubbornness also do not go unnoticed. Ruppert understands the promise of a “long life in the land” which accompanies the fourth commandment rather in the spiritualized sense of the deuteronomic text, which refers to the “long life” of individual Israelites or of ancient Israel as a nation (“die Länge des Lebens Israels,” p. 276). Contrary to this view, however, the New Testament portrays old human beings and old age more frequently in the physical sense. On the whole, if old age or old human beings would be valuable and success- ful, blessed with immaterial vigor and true wisdom, Ruppert concludes that ancient Israelites must have the fear of and communion with Yahweh their God.31 Furthermore in 1979, Josef Scharbert wrote his article: “Das Alter und die Alten in der Bibel” (“Old Age and the Old People in the Bible”). He begins this six-part work with an examination of various terms used for and in relation to old age in “der Sprache der Bibel” (p. 339), covering the Old Testament in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, and the New Testament. He notes and its cognates are used generally to depict persons of זָקֵן that the Hebrew venerated age, bearing top-ranking social responsibilities such as judges and advocates. In the second section, he presents what he terms “concrete evidences” (“konkrete Angaben”) to support the idea of this esteemed age, which ranges in biblical traditions from sixty years to 120 years. Scharbert discusses the power and moral principles of the old people in the next section. Here, he notes that the Covenant and Holiness codes enjoin the honoring of the aged folk who served as political elements, royal counselors, and wisdom teachers to younger generations. The infirmities of old age is considered next, the fear of which proves beneficial, according to Scharbert, in that it draws the older people closer to Yahweh as their Sustainer. He cites the aged psalmist (Ps. 71:9–18) and the old Qohelet (Koh. 11:9–12:7) as examples. In the fifth section, Scharbert presents some theological observations about old age in the Old Testament. In his own view, the promise of long life or days that is attached to the command to honor one’s father and mother means “advanced age” (“hohes Alter”), but he adds that this promise does not guarantee wisdom in old age and neither does it constitute a reward for a virtuous life (“langes Leben nicht immer Lohn für tugendhaftes Leben,” p. 350). Wisdom belongs to Yahweh, he stresses, and the pious Israelites knew that “in old age (both) infirmity and greatness, foolishness and wisdom, obstinacy and intelligent discretion lie closely together” (“im Alter CHAPTER ONE 9 liegen Schwäche und Grösse, Torheit und Weisheit, Eigensinn und kluge Zurückhaltung nahe beieinander,” p. 351). He concludes his work with an examination of the venerated age in the New Testament, wherein he discovers that neither the partial glorification of the esteemed age in the Old Testament wisdom books nor the skeptical view of old age in the Book of Job nor the burden of old age in Qoheleth is acknowledged.32 More and more in-depth treatments of the biblical theology of aging and old age began to appear since the early eighties. Rolf Knierim and Frank Stagg concurrently break the ground of this scholarly trend. The 1981 one- volume comprehensive evaluation of religion and aging, Ministry with the Aging, includes Knierim’s essay on “Age and Aging in the Old Testament.” Knierim approaches his study from an anthropo-theological perspective. His phenomenological method sheds light on three aspects of aging in ancient Israel. First, in the biological perspective, he sees the phenomenon of aging and age as a natural part of the total human life span, whose concluding phase, old age, is considered generally as a sign of blessing from Yahweh, regardless of its weakening vitality. Second, in the sociological perspective, he sees being or becoming old as a diachronic and synchronic integral part of the ancient society. Third, in the psychological perspective, Knierim notes a correlation between old age and wisdom but adds that advanced years also could be devoid of true wisdom without the fear and spirit or breath of Yahweh.33 In his book, The Bible Speaks on Aging (1981), Stagg attempts to interpret biblical texts which are relevant to age, aging, and ageism, with the aim of discouraging ageism by making both older and younger people understand what the Bible says about stereotyping. Throughout this study, Stagg strategically hints at the relationship between age and wisdom that, in ancient Israel as well as in the Judaic tradition, wisdom does not automatically come with age, but “prevailingly, old age is esteemed.”34 Another in-depth study of aging after Knierim and Stagg’s is Rachel Dulin’s doctoral dissertation titled, “Old Age in the Hebrew Scriptures: A Phenomenological Study,” and completed in 1982 at Northwestern University. In this scholarly evaluation of old age (revised and published in 1988 as, A Crown of Glory: A Biblical View of Aging), Dulin admits following Knierim’s suggested methodology. Thus, she also undertakes a “phenomenological thematic study” of aging. Her opening chapter examines the phrase, “length of days” as the ancient Israelite concept of “the fountain of youth,” drawing some illustrations from the ancient Near Eastern literature. Chapter two focuses on the physical characteristics of old age, such as, gray hair, loss of eyesight, loss of potency, loss of hearing, loss of taste, and others. The third chapter considers the 10 CHAPTER ONE psychological characteristics of old age such as frustration over losses of alertness, mental acumen, independence, and self-respect. “The Old and the Community” is treated in the fourth chapter, wherein the status and indispen- sable presence of the aged in society are discussed. The concluding chapter features “Old Age and Human Reflection.” Here, old age is examined in relation to the concepts of wisdom, retribution, and spiritual experience. Like Stagg regarding the attribution of sapience to old age, Dulin also poses for a median stance: “to grow old did not guarantee a person the attainment of wisdom, nor did it necessarily stop one from moving into an advisory position as an elder in Israel. Wisdom from this perspective was gained only through God’s wish and regardless of the aging process.”35 Moreover in 1982, Abraham Malamat issued his four-page article on “Longevity.” In this concise work, he examines the biblical concepts of life span and old age and compares them with the views of ancient Israel’s neighboring (such as Mesopotamian and Egyptian) cultures, noting especially their similarities.36 As biblical scholars continue their investigations on aging and old age, theologians also strive on in their studies of this theme. Consequently, several writings have been published on the theology of aging which cite biblical texts but which could not be technically categorized as biblical studies. One of such works, which collates comparative religious views of aging, was published in 1982 by Opera Pia International, Inc. as: Aging: Spiritual Perspectives. This volume features several theological articles which incorporate numerous scriptural citations.37 In their respective studies, W. Paul Jones (1984), Nathan R. Kollar (1985), T. Herbert O’Driscoll (1985), Stephen Post (1992), Sheldon Isenberg (1992), and Stephen Bertman and W. Andrew Achenbaum (1994) address the issue of spirituality of aging and old age.38 Post examines “aging and meaning” in the Christian tradition, compar- ing both Catholic and Protestant theological perspectives. Although the concept of “virtuous aging” is common to both traditions, they differ in their interpretations of this idea. While Catholics view aging as a virtue in terms of the “contemplative vision of God” through “otherworldly orientation,” Protestants emphasize “obedience to divine commandment within the world” (pp. 132–33). Also, while Catholics (and fundamentalist Protestants) per- ceive aging and death in light of the Augustinian tradition of “original sin,” liberal Protestants maintain that no such gruesome depictions of aging and death as natural evils exist in the Scriptures. Post as well observes that whereas Augustine lavished his youthful days in lustful living, he ironically spent his old-age years in deep devotion to the Holy Scriptures. For to Augustine, “old age is not a time to ‘relapse,’ to slide back into vice.”39 In his CHAPTER ONE 11 own examination of “Aging in Judaism,” Isenberg discovers two strands: the positive and the negative dimensions of old age in both the Hebrew Bible and the Judaic literature. On the one hand, old age is portrayed generally in positive terms, such as “a crown of glory,” a divine blessing, a honorable life stage, and a wisdom repository. On the other hand, old age is viewed occasionally in negative terms, such as a curse, “days of sorrow/darkness,” and a time of feebleness and infirmities. Isenberg’s study incorporates considerable elements of biblical scholarship. For instance, he addresses such issues as the concept of life span or age in the patriarchal narratives in Genesis, the Deuteronomist’s view of ancient Israel’s elders with regards to honor and wisdom, and the portrayal of advanced years in both the Old Testament wisdom literature and “the Hellenistic Jewish wisdom literature.” His evaluation of the Judaic literature even includes the Cairo Geniza documents. He quotes S. D. Goitein’s concluding observation of the socio- religious life in that Egyptian settlement as follows: “ ‘In the Bible-oriented society of the Geniza, good old age was the natural reward for (and, therefore, proof of) a virtuous life’.”40 Interestingly, Bertman and Achenbaum also trace the Deuteronomic portrait of the old-age experiences of ancient Israel’s King David and compare them with those of the ancient Greek King Oedipus, in order to argue that “gerontocracy” was the dominant form of government in ancient worlds.41 Furthermore, Dale Schlitt’s 1985 “Theological Reflections on Aging” examines the themes of “temporality, experience and memory” in old age.42 Both K. Brynolf Lyon and William Hendricks also wrote their theologies of aging in 1985. Lyon’s Toward a Practical Theology of Aging is issued as a part of the “Theology and Pastoral Care” series. Two of the seven chapters of this work examine aging in the context of the Christian theological tradition and in relation to the themes of hope, blessing, and redemption.43 Hendricks presents his work, A Theology for Aging, as “an elemental Christian theology” (a kind of “theological anthropology” in my assessment) from “a conservative, Protestant, conversionist perspective” and his own personal “practical experience” of aging (p. 7). Although his study is not a biblical theology of aging nor “a scholarly, formal, academic theology” but a “confessional” type of “theology based on revelatory insights as filtered through the experiences of older Christians” and saturated with biblical citations, he claims for it “the authority of God through Scripture . . . from the first page” (pp. 7, 8). On the whole, Hendricks’ theological treatment of the “revealed wisdom of the elders” even seems to be parenthetical in his work.44 Robert Carlson also writes a theological reflection on “The Gift of Wisdom,” which appears in Affirmative Aging. He sees age and wisdom as a 12 CHAPTER ONE dyad in biblical traditions, but wisdom as “fundamentally a gift of God” and “always a gift to be shared.” He asserts that “while wisdom does not come automatically with old age, wisdom seldom comes without the honing of life that long experience brings.”45 Since the mid-eighties, some Old Testament scholars have focused their studies on the concept of old age or aging specifically in the Wisdom Literature. The earliest in this category is James Crenshaw’s essay on “Youth and Old Age in Qoheleth” (1986). According to him, this article is a part of his larger 1984–85 research project on “The Depiction of Old Age in Ancient Near Eastern Wisdom Literature.” Crenshaw admits that on the whole, wisdom and good counsel are associated with advanced years in Ugarit, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Israel. On the contrary, this traditional idealization of old age does not satisfy at least one of ancient Israel’s sages, Qoheleth, who portrays the pains and discomforts of aging and old age.46 In 1988, Michael Fox also came forth with his essay on “Aging and Death in Qohelet 12.” Fox first explores earlier exegetical approaches to this passage, which include: allegorical or literal interpretation (such as by Michael Leahy, 1952; Oswald Loretz, 1964; and M. Gilbert, 1981);47 parabolic interpretation (such as by J. F. A. Sawyer, 1976);48 and transitional interpretation (such as by Hagia Witzenrath, 1979).49 Since this trial allegorical approach is proven inadequate, Fox further examines the interplay of meaning set forth from three dimensions (three meaning-types) which are not mutually exclusive: the literal, symbolic and figurative/allegorical meanings. While the poem is not an allegory, he opts for a figurative interpretation or “an imaginative reading” through which he hopes the reader could discern and personalize the author’s meaning. Since Qoheleth is probably an aged person, Fox concludes that this meaning results from a life of accumulated experience.50 Norbert Lohfink’s article on Qoh. 11:9–12:8 also notices the elderly advice given by the author (who apparently is an older person) to the younger generation to enjoy life before it becomes too late. He sees striking similarities between this ancient Israelite wisdom text and other ancient Near Eastern texts, such as the Egyptian Song of the Harper and the Greek lyrics of Mimnermos (c. 600 B. C. E.) and of Theognis (c. 600–500 B. C. E.). He also notices that Qoheleth is profoundly unique.51 In The Bible Today issue dedicated to an evaluation of the aging process, Reidar Bjornard contributes his essay, titled “Aging According to Wisdom Literature.” He explores how old age and the aged were valued in ancient Israel. He observes that “a close correlation between growing old and attaining greater wisdom” seems natural in this ancient culture. Bjornard thus concludes that “aging means acquiring knowledge and wisdom,” and that this experience is “a task CHAPTER ONE 13 pleasing to God” in the Hebrew tradition (pp. 331, 333).52 As special attention is being given to the Wisdom Literature, of course, research on the biblical concept of aging and old age also continues through the mid-eighties and into the nineties. In 1985, Jean-Pierre Prevost presented his essay in French: “Vieiller ou ne pas vieiller? Le point de vue de l’Ancien Testament” (“Older or not Older? The Point of View of the Old Testament”). In this three-part work, Prevost first evaluates various terms used for and in and ,יָשֵׁשׁ , ֵ שׂיבָה/ ֵ שׂיב ,זָקֵן relation to old age in the Old Testament, including He concludes this section with a discussion on the chronological .בָא בַיָמֶים criteria for determining who is old (“l’âge des ‘anciens’ “) in the Hebrew Bible. Second, he considers the social status of the aged (elders). Here, he sees the elders both at the center and the periphery of ancient Israelite societal affairs. At the center, they functioned as counselors (“des porte- parole”), judicial authorities, socio-political chiefs, and witnesses (“té- moins”) to the giving of Yahweh’s instructions to the people of ancient Israel. On the periphery, the elders enjoyed societal respect and protection as commanded by Yahweh (Lev. 19:32). Prevost concludes his article with the Old Testament depiction of the experience of growing old. Here, he sees old age as a desire (being a divine blessing, Gen. 25:8; Exod. 23:26; Ps. 91:16), as a dread (due to the physical decline that accompanies it, Deut. 31:1–2; Ps. 71:18; Eccl. 12:1–7), and as a disputed concept regarding the traditional association of old age with wisdom (“vieillese et sagesse”). He argues that there are biblical witnesses to the fact that wisdom does not always belong to old age, such as Job 12:1–12; 32:6–9; Qoh. 4:13; Ps. 119:100.53 In a 1986 article, Ralph Smith discusses “Attitudes Toward Aged People in the Old Testament.” He notes that the general attitude was that of respect and honor toward the elderly people for their wisdom, especially in giving counsel to younger folks and making judgments at the city gates. “However, old age and long life was no guarantee of wisdom,” he also observes.54 More so in 1987, Stephen Sapp and J. Gordon Harris’ books respectively came off the press. Sapp’s work, Full of Years, has been described by its publisher as a “Bible-based guidebook” on aging. Although he cites Scriptures throughout the five-chapter book, Sapp thoroughly discusses the biblical concept of aging and obligations toward the aged only in two chapters. In chapter two, he treats the depiction of old age in the Hebrew Bible from anthropological, sociological, and biological perspectives. He concludes that the Hebrews understood aging as part of God’s plan and old age as a blessing from God. The wisdom that comes with aging compensates for the decline of physical vitality in growing older, Sapp indicates. Chapter three examines “Aging and 14 CHAPTER ONE the Elderly in the New Testament” also from anthropological and sociological perspectives. Attitudes toward aging in the New Testament also reinforce the Old Testament concept. On this account, Sapp concludes: “The New Testament also reflects the attitude of the Old Testament that the elderly generally possess greater wisdom and therefore are worthy of special respect.”55 The book, Biblical Perspectives on Aging, appears as a volume in the “Overtures to Biblical Theology” series. Through his cross-disciplinary approach in this work, Harris explores the socio-theological concepts of aging in the ancient Near East, with closer attention being focused on ancient Israel, Early Christianity, and Judaism. He delineates the relationship between God and the elderly vis-a-vis the attitudes toward them in ancient societies. He sees the Old Testament God as the Defender of the cause of the weak and the oppressed through the social structures of the community. To ensure social justice via respect and honor for the aged folks, God gave ancient Israel the Decalogue and wisdom instructions such as Proverbs as a manual for daily living. A common theology was developed thereby, and despite the threat posed against this social order by the emergence of the monarchy and the infiltration of foreign influences in ancient Israel, Harris notes that the Hebrews maintained their traditional commitment to giving honor to whom honor was due: the elderly who were designated as “sages and heirs of divine enlightenment.”56 Harris also treats the values of aging in the New Testament and rabbinic literature as two significant responses to the earlier Hebrew varied common theology. He concludes that both Early Christianity and Judaism also upheld the validity of filial honor and obedience to parents and older leaders. Whereas the New Testament subjects such respect and obedience to the supremacy of God’s kingdom, rabbinic teachings “never questioned the wisdom of elders and the absolute nature of filial responsibilities.”57 No other book has appeared that I know of since Harris’ comprehensive treatment of the biblical theology of aging. The four known studies that follow his work are essays. Lloyd Bailey (1989) and Robert Martin-Achard (1991) also adopt for their respective works the title: “Biblical Perspectives on Aging.” Two other essays were issued in German in 1992: Willy Schottroff’s work which is included in the Wolff Festschrift, and Otto Kaiser’s study which is featured in the Sauer Festschrift. Bailey begins his study with the recognition of the difficulty in using the modern mode of understanding to interpret the ancient concept of aging, which the Bible itself does not fully address. He evaluates two attitudes which are related regarding the aged and the aging process in ancient Israel. He states that the first has CHAPTER ONE 15 attracted deep scholarly treatment (especially by Harris and Sapp), while the second suffers scholarly neglect. On ancient Israel’s attitude toward the aged, Bailey notes three basic underlying assumptions: that older people have mature experience and wisdom generally resides with the older generation but wise counsel is not with the elders only, that older folks are custodians of religious tradition, and that long life may be considered God’s blessing. Hence, respecting the aged has been commanded by God. On the attitude toward aging, Bailey concludes that it was generally accepted by the He- brews “as part of the life-cycle, as part of the Creator’s design for all living things.”58 Martin-Achard also notes that old age is depicted as a gift of God in the Hebrew Bible. Despite the physical infirmities associated with old age, the covenant people of God still generally view life as a good thing, and its prolongation, as “a manifest sign of the divine blessing.”59 After reviewing three dominant scholarly views on the command: “Honor your father and your mother” (Exod. 20:12; Deut. 5:16), Martin-Achard briefly discusses the issues of wisdom and hope in old age. Although not all ancient Israel’s “elders” are old men, he concludes, Old Testament people of advanced years are generally honored, for “their great age has allowed them to acquire wisdom which is contested here and there (Ps. 119.100; Job 12.12; 32.4ff.).”60 Finally, both Schottroff and Kaiser’s works address social issues as related to old age in the Hebrew Bible. Schottroff discusses “Alter als soziales Problem in der hebräischen Bibel” (“Old Age as a Social Problem in the Hebrew Bible”). The highlights of this work include: the age marked for becoming old, the worth and dignity of old age, the family’s responsibility of caring for the aged, and dreams and hopes of older folk. Schottroff begins his observation on the worth and dignity of old age with a striking statement: “The worth of old age lies in its wisdom” (“Der Wert des Alters liegt in seiner Weisheit,” p. 69). He adds to this comment that the Hebrew Bible also indicates that, sometimes, foolishness accompanies old age, citing the examples of Job and Elihu who challenged the traditional opinion of the Joban three friends (Job 12:12–13; 32:9; cf. Ps. 119:100). Furthermore, Schottroff notes that, despite the weakening and deterioration of strength that comes along with advanced years, the social audience (Horeren) accorded the aged people in the ancient Israelite society attests to the honor and respect (Ehre und Ehrerbietung) which old age also brings along as a compensation for their physical losses.61 Kaiser’s essay is on “ ‘Und dies sind die Geschlechter . . .’ Alt und jung im Alten Testament” (“ ‘And These Are the Generations . . .’ Old and Young in the Old Testament”). In this study, he examines the Old Testament teaching regarding intergenerational 16 CHAPTER ONE relationships, concentrating on the young and the old. He observes the social structure of ancient Israelite society, with regard to the place of individuals within the family, tribe, and nation. He sees the aged as the conveyors of blessing upon the young. He also notes the reciprocal regard that transpired in society, wherein the young honored their elderly for their wisdom and experience and the aged also esteemed their younger generations. The society as a whole enjoyed God’s blessings and prosperity.62 It is evident that most of the works being evaluated above have over- whelmingly demonstrated some awareness of the correlation of wisdom with old age in ancient Israel. These studies also display a general acceptance of the biblical witness to the traditional social status of the aged as pillars of the ancient community of faith, in terms of the blessings they conferred upon, wise counsels they gave to, and wisdom legacies they left behind for younger generations. Although scholarly opinions vary as to the extent in which wisdom is the property of old age, a consensus seems to surface that, despite the traditional attribution of sapience with advanced years, the endowment of wisdom remains the prerogative of Yahweh. Of all scholarly endeavors made to study aging and old age in ancient Israel, however, no attempt points in the direction of investigating in detail the connection between wisdom and old age. Since this theme has socio-theological significance, it deserves further scholarly investigation. Thus, the purpose of the present study is to probe that Hebrew tradition for further awareness. Certainly, ancient Israel as the covenant people of Yahweh did not exist in a social vacuum. They had a socio-religious history, which preserves the mode of their relationship with Yahweh as well as of their interpersonal relationships. Such a history did not evolve overnight: it underwent a process of development, during which it was transmitted both orally and literarily to become what are known today as biblical traditions. By virtue of their social status, the Hebrew older people played a significant role in the transmission of these ancient socio-religious traditions.63 Evidently, wisdom was a key aspect of these traditions, and the family had served as its initial social location.64 To some scholars, the family played a role beyond the initial stage but even became a medium of continuity through all periods of ancient Israelite life.65 Since the importance of family continued from early Israel through the monarchical era and even until post-exilic time, as attested also in the Wisdom Literature, I intend to explore in this work how the traditional association of sapience with advanced years had transpired over time, paying particular attention to changes that occurred in the socio-cultural semantics of wisdom and old age, with the aim of making some significant contribution to Old Testament research. CHAPTER ONE 17

Nature and Scope of the Study Although this project is a study in biblical theology, it is limited in scope. It is not biblical theology in the sense of covering the whole Christian Bible. It is not even an Old Testament theology in the sense of detailing all aspects of the Hebrew Bible. By nature, the research will address a single (dyad) theme of “wisdom and old age,” which is actually an attempt to highlight the correspondences between these two distinct Old Testament theological themes. In a sense, I will endeavor to look beyond studies that have been conducted on these themes. This scholarly venture is also not an attempt to explore Old Testament wisdom theology either as a segment or as an entity, since that theme has been subjected to various extensive investigations. Although some aspects of wisdom theology (such as issues of Sitz im Leben and semantics) will be discussed, a detailed evaluation of the origin or social location of wisdom is outside the scope of this study. In short, I have chosen a technical description of what I intend to do in the following pages to be a biblical (an Old Testament) theology of “geronsapience” or “gerassapience.”66 This work is designed to have eight chapters. Chapter one, which is being presented up to this point and beyond, addresses two introductory matters. First, research challenges, such as the state of affairs on biblical theology of aging and old age as well as the goal of the study, have been treated above. Second, the nature (such as kind of scholarly discipline in view) and the scope or structure of the study (such as periods of ancient Israelite history to be covered) are now being discussed. The focus of chapter two will be methodological concerns pertaining to the project, which include mainly linguistic, tradition-historical, and socio-anthropological approaches. Both the third and the fourth chapters will feature philological concerns. Here, a panoramic view of both pivotal terms, “wisdom” and “old age” and their cognates, will be presented. This exploration of the etymological and semantic spectra of both terms is to set the stage for their contextual features to be examined in the following three chapters. Chapters five, six, and seven will be the core of this research, wherein the alleged Hebrew tradition of associating wisdom with advanced years will be evaluated. These chapters each will address different overlapping views of the tradition in accordance with the generally accepted notion of the three- stage development of Hebrew wisdom tradition. A socio-anthropological view of the tradition will be the main concern of chapter five. Hence, relevant biblical texts, such as, Gen. 48:1–49:28; Exod. 18:1–27; Lev. 19:32; Num. 11:16ff.; Deut. 22:13–19; 32:1–33:29; Josh. 23:1–24:31; and I Sam. 2:22–3:18; 4:13, 18, concerning “folk wisdom” and “old age” in pre- 18 CHAPTER ONE monarchical Israel, will be assessed. A socio-theological view of the tradition in monarchical Israel will be the core of chapter six. Thus, an examination of the relationship between “royal wisdom” and “old age” in such texts as, II Sam. 19:31–40; I Kings 2:1–9; 3:1–4:34; 10:1–11:8; 12:1–20; and Jer. 1:1–10; 26:16–19; becomes necessary. Chapter seven will present conflicting views of the tradition in post-monarchical Israel. During this era of “scribal wisdom” proper, the socio-cultural functions of old age with reference to traditional sapiential legacies also will be evaluated. This chapter will draw relevant textual materials from three major Old Testament writings: a) the book of Psalms, such as Pss. 37; 71; 92; and 119:97–104; b) the Wisdom Literature, such as, Job 12:1–20; 15:7–10; 32:1–14; Prov. 1:1–9:18; 20:26– 29; 23:15–25; and Eccl. 11:7–12:14; and c) the Apocryphal literature, such as, Wis. 4:7–9, 16–17; Sir. 8:6–9; 25:3–6; 32:1–13; II Macc. 6:18–31; and IV Macc. 5:1–9:9. The concluding chapter (eight) will feature a summary of discussions and research findings on the Hebrew tradition of associating wisdom with advanced years. CHAPTER ONE 19

NOTES

1 Both terms, “Old Testament” and “Hebrew Bible,” will be employed interchangeably in this project to refer to the scriptural document containing 39 books. Of course, I am aware of the current scholastic debate over which name should be assigned to the first part of the Christian Scriptures, which is popularly designated as “Old Testament” in the Protestant tradition, as Tanakh in the Jewish tradition, and as “Hebrew Bible” in the world of biblical scholars. For the nature of this argument, see the introduction (pp. 1–8) and the four essays in “Part One: What’s in a Name? The Problem of What We Study” (pp. 9–85) of Hebrew Bible or Old Testament? Studying the Bible in Judaism and Christianity, eds. Roger Brooks and John J. Collins (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990). 2 Ralph L. Smith, Old Testament Theology: Its History, Method, and Message (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Nelson Pub., 1993), 22, 30. Smith also indicates that although Gabler wrote no book himself, he inspired his contemporaries to write biblical theologies. Thus, G. L. Baur’s Theologie des Alten Testaments was the first Old Testament theology text published in 1796. See pp. 21–35 for details. For information about a translated and printed text of Gabler’s epochal address, see the following footnote. 3 See Johann Philipp Gabler, “On the Proper Distinction Between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology and the Specific Objectives of Each,” trans. John Sandys-Wunsch and Laur- ence Eldredge, in The Flowering of Old Testament Theology: A Reader in Twentieth Century Old Testament Theology, 1930–1990, Sources for Biblical and Theological Study 1, eds. Ben C. Ollenburger, Elmer A. Martens, and Gerhard F. Hasel, with a series preface by David W. Baker (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 492–502. Hasel notes that the earliest known use of the phrase “biblical theology” was by Wolfgang Jacob Christmann in Teutsche Biblische Theologie (Kempten, 1629). See Gerhard F. Hasel, Old Testament Theology: Basic Issues in the Current Debate, 4th ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1972/1991), 10–11. Interestingly since forty years ago, Ebeling had issued an article (which remains influential) whereby he points out the ambiguity in the idea of “biblical theology.” He questions what we mean by this term: “the theology contained in the Bible” or “the theology of the Bible itself” or “theology in accordance with the Bible, scriptural theology.” See Gerhard Ebeling, “The Meaning of ‘Biblical Theology’,” Journal of Theological Studies 6 (Oct. 1955): 210–25. Cf. W. J. Wessels, “Biblical Theology: A Challenge to Biblical Scholars,” Scriptura 40 (1992): 30–39. 4 For instance, Høgenhaven lists three of several meanings assigned to the phrase in the English-speaking countries as follows: a) the continental tradition defines “biblical theology” as a “theological discipline” (which encompasses both Old and New Testament theologies) whose task is to analyze and explain “main themes and common trends in the biblical literature;” b) the academic (university/college) tradition tends to use “biblical theology” as the title for a course in “biblical exegesis” (covering Old and New Tes- tament studies); and c) “Biblical Theology” has been the adopted name of a neo-critical era in the biblical studies guild. See Jesper Høpenhaven, Problems and Prospects of Old Testament Theology, The Biblical Seminar (Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1988), 73– 79. Cf. Hasel, Basic Issues, 11. I endorse the continental concept of “biblical theology” 20 CHAPTER ONE

described above, and it is from this definitive premise that I intend to do theology in this study. 5 Some Old Testament scholars have described the “departure” as “the death of Old Testament theology,” and the “dialogue” as “the revival of Old Testament theology.” For example, see Smith, OT Theology, 29–50. 6 Childs sees this movement as peculiarly American and strongly Protestant, arising after the Second World War in response to the loosely defined post-Reformation European “Biblical Theology.” See Brevard S. Childs, Biblical Theology in Crisis (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1970), 13–31. Cf. Smith, OT Theology, 50–52. 7 According to Blenkinsopp, I. A. Richards, William Empson, and others pioneered the New Criticism in the twenties and thirties. Contrary to the historical-critical studies of biblical texts, this new approach sees the text as “a closed system” and as having “a life of its own independent of its origins and even of its author’s intention.” Thus, the text “should be interpreted apart from either the historical or other realia to which it refers or the circumstances of its production and reception.” See Joseph Blenkinsopp, The Penta- teuch: An Introduction to the First Five Books of the Bible, The Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 27, 28. 8 Childs’ own response to this challenge has been a proposal for studying the Bible as a unified whole in a canonical context. See Childs, Biblical Theology in Crisis, 13–147. 9 See Walther Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament, vol. 1, trans. J. A. Baker (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1961). 10 See Gerhard von Rad, Old Testament Theology, vol. 1, trans. D. M. G. Stalker (New York: Harper & Bros., 1962). 11 Walther Zimmerli, Old Testament Theology in Outline, trans. David E. Green (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1978), 116. 12 See Samuel Terrien, Elusive Presence: Toward a New Biblical Theology, Religious Perspectives 26 (New York: Harper & Row, 1978). 13 See Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Toward an Old Testament Theology (Grand Rapids: Zonder- van, 1978). 14 Claus Westermann, Elements of Old Testament Theology, trans. Douglas W. Scott (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1978), 9 (see pp. 9–12 for details). 15 See Elmer A. Martens, A Focus on Old Testament Theology: God’s Design, with a foreword by Carl E. Armerding (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1981). What has been presented in these opening paragraphs constitutes only a terse overview of the development of Old Testament theology, since a scrutinized study of that discipline is outside the scope of this research. For more detailed accounts, see Robert C. Dentan, Preface to Old Testament Theology, rev. ed. (New York: Seabury Press, 1963); Ollen- burger, Martens, and Hasel, Flowering of OT Theology; and “The Story of Old Testa- ment Theology,” in Smith, OT Theology, 21–71. 16 See Claus Westermann, Blessing in the Bible and the Life of the Church, trans. Keith Crim, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1968/1978); Walter Brueggemann, The Land: Place as Gift, Promise, and Challenge in Biblical Faith, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977); Lloyd R. Bailey, Biblical Perspectives on Death, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979); Terence E. Fretheim, The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspec- tive, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984); J. P. M. Walsh, The Mighty From Their Thrones: Power in the Biblical Tradition, Overtures to CHAPTER ONE 21

Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987); John G. Gammie, Holiness in Israel, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989); and Samuel E. Balentine, Prayer in the Hebrew Bible: The Drama of Divine-Human Dialogue, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993). Maintaining the method which Balentine has described in the previous year as “less useful” than his adopted socio-literary and theological approach (see Balentine, Divine-Human Dia- logue, 13–32), Miller also has presented an excellent form-critical treatment of the biblical theme of prayer outside the auspices of the “Overtures to Biblical Theology” series. See Patrick D. Miller, They Cried to the Lord: The Form and Theology of Biblical Prayer (Minneapolis: Augsburg-Fortress, 1994). 17 Victor H. Matthews and Don C. Benjamin, Social World of Ancient Israel, 1250–587 BCE (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1993), xxi. Matthews and Benjamin detail the foun- dational works. 18 Otto Seesemann, “Die Ältesten im Alten Testament,” Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde (Philosophischen Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, 1895), 57. 19 H. Duesberg, “Le Vieillard dans l’Ancien Testament,” La Vie Spirituelle 82–83 (1950): 237–67. 20 John L. McKenzie, “The Elders in the Old Testament,” Biblica 40 (1959): 522. 21 See Jan Dus, “Die ‘Ältesten Israels’,” Communio Viatorum 3 (1960): 232–42; and Horstklaus Berg, “Die ‘Ältesten Israels’,” Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde (Theologischen Fakultät, Universität Hamburg, 1961). 22 Jean van der Ploeg, “Les anciens dans l’Ancien Testament,” in Lex Tua Veritas, Festschrift für Hubert Junker, eds. von Heinrich Gross and Franz Mussner (Trier: Pau- and related terms will be addressed in זָקֵן linus Verlag, 1961), 175–91. The semantics of detail in chapter four of this research below. 23 G. Henton Davies, “Elder in the Old Testament,” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, 1962: 72. 24 See W. A. Roeroe, “Die Ältestenamt im Alten Testament,” Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde (Theologischen Fakultät, Universität Mainz, 1976). 25 See Hanoch Reviv, The Elders in Ancient Israel: A Study of a Biblical Institution, trans. Lucy Plitmann (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1989). See also his article: “Elders and Sav- iors,” Oriens antiquus 16 (1977): 201–204. No wonder, Reviv’s work has been subjected to several critical evaluations. For a few of these critiques, see Joachim Buchholz, review of The Elders in Ancient Israel, by Hanoch Reviv, in Biblica 72 (1991): 100– 103; and Leslie J. Hoppe, review of The Elders in Ancient Israel, by Hanoch Reviv, in Journal of Biblical Literature 110 (1991): 132–34. 26 See Ed Glasscock, “The Biblical Concept of Elder,” Bibliotheca Sacra 144 (January- March 1987): 66–78. 27 See Joachim Buchholz, Die Ältesten Israels im Deuteronomium (Göttingen: Vanden- hoeck and Ruprecht, 1988). 28 See Timothy M. Willis, “Elders in Pre-Exilic Israelite Society,” (Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1990). Cf. his later essay: “Yahweh’s Elders (Isa. 24,23): Senior Officials of the Divine court,” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 103 (1991): 375–85. 29 Lorenz Dürr, Die Wertung des Lebens im Alten Testament und im antiken Orient. Ein Beitrag zur Erklärung des Segens des vierten Gebotes (Münster: Aschendorffsche, 1926/27), 3. More than five decades after Dürr’s work, Maier also came up with his 22 CHAPTER ONE

more specific study on the estimation of old age in the post-biblical Judaic tradition. The highlights of this article include: post-biblical linguistic uses of “old age” and related terms, age limits including scope and stages of life, positive estimation of old age (such as longevity as blessing, the command to honor the aged including parents, and older folk’s expertise in or wisdom of the Law), and negative estimation of old age in both Early Judaism and the Rabbinic Literature. See Johann Maier, “Die Wertung des Alters in der jüdischen Überlieferung der Spatantike und des frühen Mittelalters,” Saeculum 30 (1979): 355–64. 30 See Eckhard von Nordheim, “Die Lehre der Alten (Das Testament als Literaturgattung im Alten Testament und im Alten Vorderen Orient),” Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde (Theologischen Fakultät, Universität München, 1973) = Die Lehre der Alten I. Das Testament als Literaturgattung im Judentum der Hellenistisch-Römischen Zeit (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1980) and Die Lehre der Alten II. Das Testament als Literatur- gattung im Alten Testament und im Alten Vorderen Orient (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985). Of course, Westermann also has earlier argued for a close connection between wisdom and blessing in the Hebrew Bible. See Westermann, Blessing in the Bible, 35–39. For a more recent study of the Old Testament theme of blessing, see Hans-Peter Müller, “Segen im Alten Testament. Theologische Implicationen eines halb vergessenen Themas,” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 87 (1990): 1–35. 31 See Lothar Ruppert, “Der alte Mensch aus der Sicht des Alten Testamentes,” Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift 85 (1976): 270–81. 32 See Josef Scharbert, “Das Alter und die Alten in der Bibel,” Saeculum 30 (1979): 338– 54. 33 See Knierim, “Age and Aging,” 21–36. 34 Frank Stagg, The Bible Speaks on Aging (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1981), 181. 35 Rachel Z. Dulin, “Old Age in the Hebrew Scriptures: A Phenomenological Approach,” (Ph. D. dissertation, Northwestern University, 1982) = A Crown of Glory: A Biblical View of Aging (New York: Paulist Press, 1988), 77. 36 See Abraham Malamat, “Longevity: Biblical Concepts and Some Ancient Near Eastern Parallels,” Archiv für Orientforschung 19 (1982): 215–18, cited in J. Gordon Harris, Biblical Perspectives on Aging: God and the Elderly, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987), 119 n. 4, 120 n. 7. Malamat’s work could not be procured for review in this writing. 37 See Francis V. Tiso, ed., Aging: Spiritual Perspectives, with a foreword by Ettore DiFilippo and a preface by Thomas Berry (Lake Worth, FL: Sunday Pub., 1982). Some of the essays of interest in this volume include: “Aging: The Jewish Perspective” by Asher Finkel (pp. 111–34), “A Christian Theology of Aging” by Jose Pereira (pp. 135– 62), and “Epilogue: Wise Elders and Old Fools” by Francis V. Tiso (pp. 249–54). 38 See W. Paul Jones, “Aging as a Spiritualizing Process,” Journal of Religion and Aging 1 (Fall 1984): 3–16; Nathan R. Kollar, “Towards a Spirituality of Aging and Old Age,” Journal of Religion and Aging 1 (Spring 1985); 49–59; T. Herbert O’Driscoll, “Aging: A Spiritual Journey,” in Affirmative Aging: A Resource for Ministry, eds. Lorraine D. Chiaventone and Julie A. Armstrong (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1985), 1–11; Stephen G. Post, “Aging and Meaning: The Christian Tradition,” in Handbook of the Humanities and Aging, eds. Thomas R. Cole, David D. van Tassel and Robert Kas- tenbaum (New York: Springer, 1992), 127–46; Sheldon Isenberg, “Aging in Judaism: ‘Crown of Glory’ and ‘Days of Sorrow’,” in Handbook of the Humanities and Aging, CHAPTER ONE 23

147–74; and Stephen Bertman and W. Andrew Achenbaum, “Aging and Spiritual Em- powerment: The Stories of Oedipus and David,” in Aging and the Religious Dimension, eds. L. Eugene Thomas and Susan A. Eisenhandler, with a foreword by Harry R. Moody (Westport, Conn./London: Auburn House, 1994), 67–83. 39 Post, “Aging and Meaning,” 138. Cf. Augustine, The Confessions (New York: Penguin, 1961), 321; and Peter Brown, Augustine of Hippo (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), 428–32. 40 Isenberg, “Aging in Judaism,” 161. See also S. D. Goitein, A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza: Vol. 5, The Individual (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 125. 41 See Bertman and Achenbaum, “Aging and Spiritual Empowerment,” 67–83. 42 See Dale M. Schlitt, “Temporality, Experience and Memory: Theological Reflections on Aging,” Église et Théologie 16 (1985): 79–105. 43 See K. Brynolf Lyon, Toward a Practical Theology of Aging, Theology and Pastoral Care, with a series foreword by Don S. Browning (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985). 44 See William L. Hendricks, A Theology for Aging (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1986). 45 Robert W. Carlson, “The Gift of Wisdom,” in Affirmative Aging, 64–65, 76. 46 See James L. Crenshaw, “Youth and Old Age in Qoheleth,” Hebrew Annual Review 10 (1986): 1–13. 47 See Michael Leahy, “The Meaning of Ecclesiastes [12:2–5],” Irish Theological Quarterly 19 (1952): 297–300; Oswald Loretz, Qohelet und der Alte Orient (Freiburg, 1964); and M. Gilbert, “La description de la vieillesse en Qohelet XII 1–7 est-elle allégorique?” Vetus Testamentum Supplement 32 (1981): 96–109. Cf. D. Buzy, “Le portrait de la vieillesse (Ecclésiaste, XII, 1–7),” Revue biblique 41 (1932): 329–40. 48 See John F. A. Sawyer, “The Ruined House in Ecclesiastes 12: A Reconstruction of the Original Parable,” Journal of Biblical Literature 94 (1976): 519–31. 49 See Hagia Witzenrath, Süss ist das Licht (St. Ottilien, 1979). 50 See Michael V. Fox, “Aging and Death in Qohelet 12,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 42 (1988): 55–77. 51 See Norbert Lohfink, “ ‘Freu dich, junger Mann . . .,’ Das Schussgedicht des Kohelet- buches (Koh 11, 9 -12, 8),” Bibel und Kirche 45 (1990): 12–19. 52 Reider B. Bjornard, “Aging According to Wisdom Literature,” The Bible Today 30 (Nov. 1992): 330–34. 53 See Jean-Pierre Prevost, “Vieiller ou ne pas vieiller? Le point de vue de l’Ancien Testament,” Église et Théologie 16 (1985): 9–23. 54 Ralph L. Smith, “Attitudes Toward Aged People in the Old Testament,” Biblical Illustrator 12 (Summer 1986): 40. 55 Stephen Sapp, Full of Years: Aging and the Elderly in the Bible and Today (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1987), 127–28. 56 Harris, God and the Elderly, 35. 57 Ibid., 103. Harris also later wrote a short article on “Old Age” in 1992 which seems to be a summary of his earlier book. See J. Gordon Harris, “Old Age,” in The Anchor Bible Dictionary, 1992: 10–12. His latest essay highlights biblical teachings on spirituality in old age, which includes illustrative biblical cases, such as, Caleb (Numbers, Joshua), Barzillai (2 Samuel), and Naomi (Ruth). See J. Gordon Harris, “Spiritual Well-being, Maturity, and Aging: Biblical Illustrations,” in Aging and the Religious Dimension, 105–14. 24 CHAPTER ONE

58 Lloyd R. Bailey, “Biblical Perspectives on Aging,” Quarterly Review 9 (Winter 1989): 61. 59 Robert Martin-Achard, “Biblical Perspectives on Aging,” trans. John Bowden, in Aging, Concilium 1991/3, eds. Lisa Sowle Cahill and Dietmar Mieth (London: SCM Press/Philadelphia: Trinity Press, 1991), 32. 60 Ibid., 37. 61 See Willy Schottroff, “Alter als soziales Problem in der hebräischen Bibel,” in Was ist der Mensch . . .? Beiträge zur Anthropologie des Alten Testaments, Hans Walter Wolff zum 80. Geburstag, eds. Frank Crüsemann, Christof Hardmeier, and Rainer Kessler (München: Kaiser, 1992), 61–77. 62 See Otto Kaiser, “ ‘Und dies sind die Geschlechter . . .’ Alt und jung im Alten Testa- ment,” in Zur Aktualität des Alten Testaments, Festschrift für Georg Sauer zum 65. Ge- burtstag, eds. Siegfried Kreuzer and Kurt Lüthi (Frankfurt and Main/Bern/New York: Peter Lang, 1992), 29–45. 63 Knight has noted that the agents of ancient Israelite traditions “include priestly circles, Levites, storytellers, court officials, professional mourners, wisemen, elders, the family, and schools of disciples gathered around significant prophets.” See Douglas A. Knight, Rediscovering the Traditions of Israel, Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 9 (Missoula: Scholars Press, 1975), 7. 64 Three stages that have won tentative scholarly consensus regarding the Hebrew wisdom development include the family, royal and scribal stages. For example, see Roland E. Murphy, The Tree of Life: An Exploration of Biblical Wisdom Literature, The Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1990), 3–5; and Ronald E. Clements, Wisdom in Theology, The Didsbury Lectures, 1989 (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerd- mans, 1992), 22–26. 65 For a few examples, see Westermann, Blessing in the Bible, 35–39; Joseph Blenkinsopp, Wisdom and Law in the Old Testament: The Ordering of Life in Israel and Early Juda- ism, The Oxford Bible Series (Oxford/New York/Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press, 1983), 11; and Norman K. Gottwald, The Hebrew Bible: A Socio-Literary Introduction (Phila- delphia: Fortress Press, 1985), 567–71. 66 I have coined these catchwords, “geronsapience” and “gerassapience” from two words of two different languages. Γέρων is the Greek word, meaning “an old man” (human). Its abstract noun form is γέρας (γῆρας), which means “old age.” “Sapience” comes from the Latin word sapientia, meaning “wisdom.” Thus, “geronsapience” literally designates “old man (human) wisdom,” while “gerassapience” means “old-age wisdom.” See F. Wilbur Gingrich, Shorter Lexicon of the Greek New Testament (Chicago/London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1965), s. v. γέρων, and γέρας; and Richard A. Miller, Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms Drawn Practically from Protestant Scholastic The- ology (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1985), s. v. “sapientia.”