DOCSLIB.ORG

The Textual Unity of Genesis 2–4 Against the Backdrop of the History of Exegesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Textual Unity of Genesis 2–4 Against the Backdrop of the History of Exegesis The Textual Unity of Genesis 2–4 against the Backdrop of the History of Exegesis By Igal German A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Biblical Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael’s College © Copyright by Igal German 2014 The Textual Unity of Genesis 2–4 against the Backdrop of the History of Exegesis Igal German Doctor of Philosophy University of St. Michael’s College 2014 Abstract The thesis explores the literary unity of the narratives of Adam-Eve and Cain-Abel supplemented with an inquiry into the history of traditional exegesis. Most contemporary studies and commentaries reflect a varied understanding of the textual relationship between the narratives of creation and sin in Eden and outside of it (Gen 2:4b–4:16). According to one dominant stream of historical tradition, the unit of Genesis 1–3 is delimited and expounded apart from the juxtaposed chapter 4. A key figure in this hermeneutical tradition is Augustine, who devoted his Genesis commentaries to chapters 1–3 apart from the sin narrative of Cain. An important implication arising from this thesis is that Christian exegetes of Genesis should be aware of, and avoid, any uncritical adoption of the tradition represented by Augustine in their reading of the stories of the origins. According to another historic exegetical tradition of Jewish and Christian interpreters the narratives of creation and sin are treated conjointly. In their view, the narrative of Cain-Abel in Genesis 4 is closely related to the preceding narratives of Adam-Eve. These works include some representative exegetical elaborations from Second Tempe Judaism, Church Fathers, and the Protestant reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin. ii In addition to examining in detail a selected portion of the history of exegesis, this thesis delineates the narratives of Adam-Eve and Cain-Abel as an interdependent familial saga within the literary framework of Gen 2:4b–4:26. The present author contends that these juxtaposed texts are interrelated by means of the following textual elements inherent within Genesis 2–4: (1) toledot formula; (2) diptych; (3) the primeval characters; (4) the motifs of silence and voice; (5) the tests of Adam and Cain; (6) the motif of knowledge; (7) the motif of death; (8) the trials; and (9) punishment and hope. Finally, other Genesis narratives echo the literary contours of the narratives of Adam-Eve and Cain-Abel (Gen 9:20–26; 16:1–2, 12; 21:8–13; 22:1–19). iii Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge all these individuals who have been a tremendous help to me as I moved forward to the successful completion of this dissertation. I am indebted to my thesis director, Dr. Glen J. Taylor of Wycliffe College at the University of Toronto. Professor Taylor graciously mentored me throughout the whole course of my doctoral studies. Thank you so much for being patient with and kind to me. I would like to extend my gratitude to the other examiners of the dissertation for their constructive criticism and suggestions. I am grateful to Dr. Brian Irwin, Dr. John McLaughlin, Dr. Michael Kolarcik, and Dr. Bill T. Arnold. I am also thankful for the generous and constant financial support of Wycliffe College. All the teaching assistantships at Knox College and Wycliffe College, as well as other lecturing opportunities, proved beneficial for my pedagogical development. I am grateful to Dr. Marion Ann Taylor of Wycliffe College at the University of Toronto. I learned much from all the God-given opportunities to interact with other fellow doctoral students at Wycliffe College. Special thanks are due to Jake Stewart, Manhee Yoon, and Dr. Marina Hofman. I would like also to express my gratitude to Dr. Carluci Dos Santos for encouraging me during the thesis proposal stage. I appreciate those valuable interactions with other faculty members and students at the wider academic community at the Toronto School of Theology. I am also very grateful to St. Augustine’s Seminary of Toronto for granting me the teaching position of sessional lecturer in Old Testament. I am particularly indebted to Dr. Robert Nusca and Dr. Fred Chung of St. Augustine’s Seminary of Toronto. I am sincerely thankful to Leslie Demson for investing time and effort to carefully proofread the chapters of the iv dissertation. I also appreciate the timely feedback on parts of the dissertation provided by Dr. Brian Peterson from Lee University. Finally, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my parents Boris and Ada German, for their unfailing love and many sacrifices throughout the course of my doctoral program. I am very grateful to Nataliya Toporovskaya for her immeasurable love. Your tremendous care and support are so precious to me. My deepest gratitude is extended to my Saviour Yeshua ha-Mashiah (Jesus Christ) for shedding his gracious light into my heart and filling my days with goodness and mercy (Ps 23:6; 27:1, 14). Soli Deo Gloria. v Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................iv Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................viii Chapter One: The Textual Unity of Genesis 2–4 in Contemporary Scholarship ........................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 Review of Secondary Literature ..................................................................................................4 1883–1897.................................................................................................................................4 1904–1999.................................................................................................................................7 2000–2013.................................................................................................................................28 Thesis Statement ..........................................................................................................................51 Methodology ................................................................................................................................53 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................60 Chapter Two: The History of Interpretation from Antiquity to the Reformation ........................61 Second Temple Jewish Sources ...................................................................................................62 Sirach ........................................................................................................................................62 Wisdom of Solomon .................................................................................................................65 Apocalyptic Texts .....................................................................................................................68 Adam, Eve, and Cain ................................................................................................................73 Satan ..........................................................................................................................................81 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................83 The New Testament .....................................................................................................................84 Romans 5 ..................................................................................................................................87 1 Corinthians 15 ........................................................................................................................90 Romans 1 ..................................................................................................................................92 Hebrews 11 and 1 John 3 ..........................................................................................................93 The Church Fathers ......................................................................................................................95 Irenaeus of Lyons ......................................................................................................................97 Cyril of Jerusalem and Salvian the Presbyter ...........................................................................99 vi Origen and Ephrem the Syrian ..................................................................................................100 John Chrysostom .......................................................................................................................101 Augustine of Hippo ...................................................................................................................103 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................110
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partners with God
    Partners with God Theological and Critical Readings of the Bible in Honor of Marvin A. Sweeney Shelley L. Birdsong & Serge Frolov Editors CLAREMONT STUDIES IN HEBREW BIBLE AND SEPTUAGINT 2 Partners with God Table of Contents Theological and Critical Readings of the Bible in Honor of Marvin A. Sweeney Abbreviations ix ©2017 Claremont Press Preface xv 1325 N. College Ave Selected Bibliography of Marvin A. Sweeney’s Writings xvii Claremont, CA 91711 Introduction 1 ISBN 978-1-946230-13-3 Pentateuch Is Form Criticism Compatible with Diachronic Exegesis? 13 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rethinking Genesis 1–2 after Knierim and Sweeney Serge Frolov Partners with God: Theological and Critical Readings of the Bible in Exploring Narrative Forms and Trajectories 27 Honor of Marvin A. Sweeney / edited by Shelley L. Birdsong Form Criticism and the Noahic Covenant & Serge Frolov Peter Benjamin Boeckel xxi + 473 pp. 22 x 15 cm. –(Claremont Studies in Hebrew Bible Natural Law Recorded in Divine Revelation 41 and Septuagint 2) A Critical and Theological Reflection on Genesis 9:1-7 Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-946230-13-3 Timothy D. Finlay 1. Bible—Criticism, Narrative 2. Bible—Criticism, Form. The Holiness Redaction of the Abrahamic Covenant 51 BS 1192.5 .P37 2017 (Genesis 17) Bill T. Arnold Former Prophets Miscellaneous Observations on the Samson Saga 63 Cover: The Prophet Jeremiah by Barthélemy d’Eyck with an Excursus on Bees in Greek and Roman Buogonia Traditions John T. Fitzgerald The Sword of Solomon 73 The Subversive Underbelly of Solomon’s Judgment of the Two Prostitutes Craig Evan Anderson Two Mothers and Two Sons 83 Reading 1 Kings 3:16–28 as a Parody on Solomon’s Coup (1 Kings 1–2) Hyun Chul Paul Kim Y Heavenly Porkies 101 The Psalm in Habakkuk 3 263 Prophecy and Divine Deception in 1 Kings 13 and 22 Steven S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Creation and the Construction of a New Concept of Theodicy: Job 38-42
    The Language of Creation and the Construction of a New Concept of Theodicy: Job 38-42 Nicole Marie Hildebrand Faculty of Religious Studies McGill University, Montréal August 2006 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Arts © Nicole Marie Hildebrand, 2006 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32523-0 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32523-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell th es es le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does the Old Testament Say About God?
    What Does the Old Testament Say About God? BY CLAUS WESTERMANN Edited by Friedemann WI Golka JOHN KNOX PRESS ATLANTA -_ Editor’s Preface This book is based on the Sprunt Lectures delivered by Professor D. Claus Westermann at IJnion Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia, from January 3 1 to February 3, 1977. The first four lectures, which have been translated by Julian Grinsted and the present editor, appear more or less in their original form with the addition of biblio- graphical material. The two final lectures (chapters V and VI) have been thoroughly revised and retranslated by the Reverend Alastair Unless otherwise indicated, the Scripture quotations in this book are from the Revised H. B. Logan and the present editor. I am also greatly indebted to my Standard Version Bible, copyright 1946, 1952, and @ 1971, 1973 by the Division of colleague Alastair Logan for taking upon himself the labor of proof- Christian Education, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U. S. A. and reading. are used by permission. Last, but by no means least, thanks must go to Lady Frances M. Bruce Lockhart for her perseverance in typing not only the original I,rbrary of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data lectures, but also the version presented in this book. We~terrmnn, Claus. What does the Old Testament say about God’? Friedemann W. Golka University of Exeter, Devon, U. K. “13xxd 011 the Sprunt lectures delivered . at ~!nim ‘l‘h~~~l~gical Seminary, Richmond, Virginia, May 1978 from J;tnu:try 31 to February 3, 1977.” Ir~lude~ hlhliographical references.
    [Show full text]
  • Foster~Volume 1
    Bratich z Amassing the Multitude 1 1 The Multivalence of the Term “Original Text” in New Testament Textual Criticism Eldon Jay Epp Introduction ne hundred and ninety-one years ago, in 1808, Johann Leonhard Hug’s Introduction to the New Testament carried statements that, in part, may Ostrike textual critics as being far ahead of their time. Hug laments the loss of all the original manuscripts of the New Testament writings “so import- ant to the church” and wonders: “How shall we explain this singular fact?” Next, he observes that Paul and others employed secretaries, but Hug views the closing salutation, written in the author’s own hand, as “sufficient to give them the value of originals.” Then, referring to the further role that scribes and correctors must have played after such a Christian writing had been dictated by its author, he says: Let us now suppose, as it is very natural to do, that the same librarius [copyist] who was employed to make this copy, made copies likewise for opulent individuals and other churches – and there was no original at all, or there were perhaps ten or more [originals] of which none could claim superiority.1 A writing with no original? Or, with ten originals? And proposed by a scholar at the outset of the nineteenth century? Later Hug asserts that “the New Testament has had the peculiar fate of suffering more by intentional alterations than the Source: Harvard Theological Review, 92(3) (1999): 245–281. 2 New Testament Studies works of profane literature . and the heretics, to whom it would perhaps be attributed, had no share in it.”2 What he is saying by both assertions is that, because “strange things had happened in individual mss, even at this early period”3 (that is, before the mid-third century).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER ONE Introductory Matters
    CHAPTER ONE Introductory Matters Being a sacred document of faith and socio-religious history, the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible1 has been subjected to various scholarly investigations since the dawn of the modern era. At the on-set, Old Testa- ment study was dominated by the quest for a theological understanding of the Hebrew Bible. This earliest orthodox confessional approach made no distinction between biblical theology and dogmatic theology or between Old Testament theology and New Testament theology. Old Testament theology as a discipline in the modern sense is just about two centuries old. As Ralph Smith notes, many Old Testament scholars ascribe its foundation to an eighteenth-century rationalist, Johann Philipp Gabler, who attributed the confusion in the Christian world to “an improper use of the Bible” and lack of distinction “between dogmatic theology and the simple historical religion of the Bible.” Through his March 30, 1787, inaugural speech at the Univer- sity of Altdorf, he thus “called for a separation of dogmatic and biblical theology,” and hence “he is often called the father of biblical theology.”2 Gabler’s call was in response to a demand for what was termed “biblical theology” since about the mid-seventeenth century—a critical trend which resulted from the insufficiency of and danger posed by the Protestant Reformation principle of sola scriptura with regard to the method of doing theology. Of course, neither Gabler nor the Reformers did originate the phrase “biblical theology.” He rather employed and described
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Rolf P. Knierim and Mrs. Hildegard E. Knierim
    1 Professor Rolf P. Knierim and Mrs. Hildegard E. Knierim Obituary Marvin A. Sweeney Claremont School of Theology I deeply regret to announce the passing of Professor Rolf P. Knierim (90) and Mrs. Hildegard E. Knierim, née Salm, (89) on September 29, 2018. Both died instantly in an automobile accident near Winslow, Arizona, while returning to Claremont from a brief vacation in New Mexico. Professor Knierim was born in Pirmasens and Mrs. Knierim was born in Edenkoben, both in the Rhineland-Palatinate region in Germany near the French border. They met at the age of 5 or 6 in elementary school, and later faced the challenges of World War II. Professor Knierim was forced into military service at the age of 15, but later turned himself in to American MP’s following the bombardment and capture of his home town. After the conclusion of the war, he continued his education at the Humanitisches Gymnasium in Pirmasens, the Methodist Seminary in Frankfurt am Main, and Heidelberg University. The Knierims were married in 1955, and Professor Knierim was ordained as an Elder in the Methodist Church in 1957. Mrs. Knierim devoted herself to her family. She was well- known for her cheerful personality, her wonderful hospitality, and her own keen intellect. The Knierims are the parents of five children, Johannes, Eva, Eberhard, Barbara, and Gabriele Knierim, and they are grandparents of five grandchildren. While at Heidelberg, Professor Knierim served as a pastor, hospital chaplain, assistant to Professors Claus Westermann and Gerhard von Rad, and Privatdozent. He was invited to write a 2 doctoral dissertation under the supervision of Professor von Rad, and he earned his Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Education in Ancient Israel by James Crenshaw, Choice 36:5 (January 1999)
    Curriculum Vitae for Joel S. Kaminsky Updated January 2014 Home Address and Phone: 252 Prospect Street, Northampton, MA 01060, 413-586- 0021; Campus Address and Phone: Wright Hall 126, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, 413-585-3608. Degrees: Doctorate June 1993 University of Chicago Divinity School, Dissertation Topic: “Punishment Displacement in the Hebrew Bible” Master's June 1984 University of Chicago Divinity School, Divinity. Bachelor's June 1982 Miami University, OH. Majors: Religion, Pol. Sci. Awards and Honors: Ph.D. Qualifying Examinations passed with Distinction, March 1987. Employment History: Smith College, Northampton, MA. Professor in the Department of Religion teaching Bible, Biblical Hebrew, Judaic Studies and Religion courses. 1997-present. Chair of the Religion Dept. 2010-11. Member Program in Jewish Studies 1997-present, served as the Director, Program in Jewish Studies 2004-06, Jan. 2007-2009. Member Program in Archaeology 2004-Present, served as Director, Program in Archaeology 2008-09. Member of the Program in Ancient Studies 2006-Present. Duke University Divinity School. Visiting Professor, teaching a Ph.D. seminar on the Hebrew text and narrative technique in Genesis. Fall 2013. Yale University, Visiting Professor, teaching a graduate seminar on the Hebrew Exegesis of Judges. Fall 2009. Visiting Associate Professor, teaching a graduate seminar on Israel’s election theology. Fall 2007. St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN. Assistant Professor in the Religion Department teaching Bible, Judaic Studies and Introduction to Western Religions. 1994-97. Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA. Assistant Professor in the Religion Dept. teaching Judaic Studies, Bible, and Intro. to Judaism, Christianity and Islam. 1993-94. Loyola University, Chicago, IL.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth-Century Old Testament Studies: a Quick Survey WALTER BRUEGGEMANN Columbia Theological Seminary Decatur, Georgia
    Word & World Volume XX, Number 1 Winter 2000 Twentieth-Century Old Testament Studies: A Quick Survey WALTER BRUEGGEMANN Columbia Theological Seminary Decatur, Georgia HE CONTOURS OF WESTERN CULTURAL HISTORY THROUGH THE TWENTIETH century are in large sweep identifiable: an initial moment of innocence until 1914, the willful barbarism of the two wars (1914-1945), the long tense stand-off of the cold war (1945-1989), and a final decade of localism in the presence of “the last superpower” (1989-2000). I do not suggest that the story of critical Old Testament study is dictated or controlled by the forces of public history. But neither does this particular tale of scholarship exist in a vacuum, without reference to context. In re- viewing and assessing such scholarship, it is important to remember that scholar- ship is conducted by real people who live in the real world with its immense gifts and dangers. I. Old Testament studies at the outset of the twentieth century were completely Among WALTER BRUEGGEMANN’s many writings is his recent proposal, Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, and Advocacy (Fortress, 1997). In the past hundred years, Old Testament scholarship has moved from the his- torical positivism of the late nineteenth century through the strong theological in- terpretations of mid-century and the literary or canonical concerns of the 1970s to the variety of methods given birth by the radical pluralism of century’s end. Great change has brought the field great vitality and energy. Copyright © 2000 by Word & World, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, MN. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl-Henrik Wallerstein: in Search of Solid Ground
    Karl-Henrik Wallerstein In Search of Solid Ground Understanding the Epistemology, Hermeneutics, and Theology in Walter Brueggemann’s Theology of the Old Testament, Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy For Walter Brueggemann, the postmodern situation offers a new perspective on biblical interpretation that forges its way between the historical-critical method and classical church theology. In Karl-Henrik Wallerstein his masterly Theology of the Old Testament, Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy (1997) Brueggemann present a new trajectory for the | In | 2019 of Solid Ground Search Karl-HenrikWallerstein discipline of the Old Testament which is based on a new epistemo- In Search of Solid Ground logical and hermeneutical ground. Understanding the Epistemology, Hermeneutics, and Theology in Wal- However, Brueggemann’s conclusion of a concept of God in the fray has been a challenge for the discipline. This thesis offers an ter Brueggemann’s Theology of the Old Testament, Testimony, Dispute, analysis of his approach from the backdrop of his concept of God Advocacy and its relationship between the biblical text and Brueggemann’s own epistemological and hermeneutical presuppositions as pre- sented in Theology of the Old Testament. The argument in this thesis is that it is possible conclude a theo- logical counter-testimony without a tension within YHWH. Instead of a concept of God in tension this thesis suggest that Bruegge- mann’s distinction of God above the fray and God in the fray could be labeled God above the fray and Israel in the fray. 9 789517 659307 Åbo Akademi University Press | ISBN 978-951-765-930-7 Karl-Henrik Wallerstein Born 1977 Master in Theology, one year, in Lund University, 2003 PhD-dissertation in Old Testament Theology defended at Åbo Akademi Unversity, 2019 Åbo Akademi University Press Tavastgatan 13, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Divine Anger, Divine Holiness and the Exclusion of Moses in Numbers and Deuteronomy Kin Foon MAN Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2017 2 Abstract This dissertation investigates the exclusion of Moses from the Promised Land in Numbers and Deuteronomy. Why are there different reasons given for his exclusion in the two books? Can they be explained by the complex redactions of Deuteronomy? There are four different answers to the question of Moses’ exclusion. According to Deut 1-3, divine anger is directed at Moses because he is the leader of the first exodus generation on whom the wrath of God is visited. Moses is excluded because he should bear the same punishment as the first generation of Israelites who left Egypt. Another reason is given in Deut 4, a mixture of late layers in the Deuteronomistic History.
    [Show full text]
  • Society for the Scientific Study of Religion Society of Biblical Literature
    Annual Meeting 1970 Hotel New Yorker, New York, October 22-27 American Academy of Religion Society for the Scientific Study of Religion Society of Biblical Literature American Academy of Religion Society for the Scientific Study of Religion Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting 1970 Hotel New Yorker, New York, October 22-27 THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION NATIONAL OFFICERS The American Academy of Religion was established in December PRESIDENT 1963 as successor to the National Association of Biblical In¬ Claude Welch, University of Pennsylvania structors founded in 1909. The change of name responded to VICE-PRESIDENT the new developments in the study and teaching of religion in James Burtchaell, University of Notre Dame this century. It accurately reflects the diverse training and interests of the members of the Academy. SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Robert Michaelsen, University of California, Santa Barbara The purpose of the Academy is to stimulate scholarship and foster research in the complex of disciplines that together SECRETARY constitute religion as an area of learning. Full recognition is Robert McDermott, Manhattanville College given not only to the traditional disciplines but also to those aspects of the social sciences and humanities which have come TREASURER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR to play a role in the study of religion. It is the aim of the Harry M. Buck, Wilson College Academy to provide an opportunity for the development of EXECUTIVE ASSOCIATE special interests and cross-disciplinary conversations. Robert Wright, Wilson College These aims are implemented primarily through reading of papers ASSOCIATE DIRECTORS at the annual meeting, sessions of the geographical regions, J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Testament Form Critical Project to Meet at the University of Dayton
    University of Dayton eCommons News Releases Marketing and Communications 1-5-1970 The Old esT tament Form Critical Project to Meet at the University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/news_rls Recommended Citation "The Old eT stament Form Critical Project to Meet at the University of Dayton" (1970). News Releases. 3585. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/news_rls/3585 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marketing and Communications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in News Releases by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON JOE McLAUGHL IN PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR, GENERAL PUBLICITY DAYTON, OHIO 45409 AREA CODE 513 229-2646 DAYTON, Ohio, January 5, 1970 --- Old Testament scholars from the United states, Italy and Germany, making up the committee of The Old Testament Form Critical Project, will meet at the University of Dayton from Thursday, January 8, through Tuesday, January 13. Dr. Kent Richards of UD's Department of Theological Studies is a member of the group and serving as its host during the five-day period. This is the fourth bi-annual meeting of the committee which previously met at the Union Theological Seminary, Duke University; and the Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, California. The project is designed for the eventual publication of the Interpreter's Handbook of Old Testament Form Criticism, which will be published inter­ nationally. The group's Prospectus, which reveals that the project will take five years, says: "Since the beginning of the century Biblical Studies have seen the rapid refine­ ments of old techniques and the creative advancement of new procedures.
    [Show full text]