Hotbird 1, 2, 3, 4,5(013.0)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service .............................................................................................................. -
Docuwatch Digitales Fernsehen
DocuWatch Digitales Fernsehen Im Auftrag der Landesmedienanstalten 2/99 1. AUSTRALIEN: ÜBERGANG ZU DIGITALER VERBREITUNG UND FELDVERSUCHE 2 2. JAPAN: WEIßBUCH “COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN” U.A. 4 3. FRANKREICH: STUDIE UND WEIßBUCH ZUM TERRESTRISCHEN DIGITALEN FERNSEHEN 6 4. EINZELTHEMEN 8 4.1. Großbritannien: ITC und OFTEL zum Bundling 8 4.2. Großbritannien: ITC zum Vorschlag einer Gebührenerhöhung bei digitalem Empfang 8 4.3. Großbritannien: Reaktionen auf das britische Konvergenz-Grünbuch 9 4.4. Großbritannien: ITC Guidelines für Gebärdensprache im DTV 9 4.5. Singapur übernimmt DVB-Standard 9 4.6. USA: V-Chip Implementation verläuft planmäßig 9 4.7. USA: Department of Commerce zu E-Business 9 4.8. Communications Regulatory Policy Unit der DG XIII: Multimedia Regulation 10 4.9. LfK: Bericht über Erprobungsprojekt Mediendienste 10 5. LITERATURHINWEISE 11 5.1. Zeitschriften 11 5.2. Buchveröffentlichungen 13 6. ANHÄNGE 15 6.1. Anzahl der Abonnenten von Programmpaketen /1993-1998 16 6.2. Digitale Satelliten-Programmpakete / Februar 1999 17 Zum DocuWatch Um die Entwicklung digitalen Fernsehens begleiten zu können, benötigen Entscheidungsträger bei den Regulierungsinstanzen ebenso wie alle anderen Beobachter kontinuierlich Informationen. Das Hans- Bredow-Institut sichtet im Auftrag der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Landesmedienanstalten (ALM) Dokumente aus dem wissenschaftlichen Bereich sowie von Regulierungsinstanzen, in- und ausländischen sowie supra- nationalen Organisationen und Verbänden und erstellt Zusammenfassungen, die auf die für die Arbeit der Landesmedienanstalten relevanten Fragen focussiert sind. Im Mittelpunkt stehen dabei neben inländischen Institutionen solche aus den USA, Kanada, Großbritannien und Frankreich. Daneben wird die am Institut gesammelte wissenschaftliche Literatur ausgewertet. Arbeitsgruppe digitales Fernsehen am Hans-Bredow-Institut Uwe Hasebrink, Friedrich Krotz, Wolfgang Schulz sowie Fernando Reimann Redaktionsschluß 31. -
4DTV Sidecar April01.Qxd
The Motorola 4DTV Digital Sidecar The Motorola 4DTV® digital sidecar gives you access to up to 200 digital channels currently available to C-Band customers. DigiCipher® II Programming: The Motorola 4DTV® digital sidecar give you access to up to 200 digital The Motorola 4DTV sidecar is a digital satellite channels currently available to C-Band customers. receiver that you add to your current analog C- Band system allowing you to access all the digital Free Digital Channels: If you already have access to the analog version of a channel many programmers will channels available to C-Band customers. The way give you the digital version for free. it works is simple: your analog receiver controls your dish allowing you to continue to receive Easy to Use: The Motorola 4DTV digital satellite sidecar provides features that make channel surfing a channels the same way you do now. The Motorola breeze. Search for future programs up to 7 days in 4DTV sidecar provides access to up to 200 digital advance or customize your Motorola 4DTV sidecar channels currently available to C-Band while giving with 4 favorite categories. you the digital features that make your satellite Access to High Definition: The Motorola 4DTV sidecar system easier to use. comes with a port that will allow you to access high definition television with the HDD-200 decoder. The benefit of upgrading your C-Band system with the Motorola 4DTV digital sidecar is that the 3-in-1 Remote: Control your sidecar, VCR and TV with 4DTV digital sidecar is designed to work with one remote. -
American Broadcasting Company from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search for the Australian TV Network, See Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Scholarship applications are invited for Wiki Conference India being held from 18- <="" 20 November, 2011 in Mumbai. Apply here. Last date for application is August 15, > 2011. American Broadcasting Company From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For the Australian TV network, see Australian Broadcasting Corporation. For the Philippine TV network, see Associated Broadcasting Company. For the former British ITV contractor, see Associated British Corporation. American Broadcasting Company (ABC) Radio Network Type Television Network "America's Branding Broadcasting Company" Country United States Availability National Slogan Start Here Owner Independent (divested from NBC, 1943–1953) United Paramount Theatres (1953– 1965) Independent (1965–1985) Capital Cities Communications (1985–1996) The Walt Disney Company (1997– present) Edward Noble Robert Iger Anne Sweeney Key people David Westin Paul Lee George Bodenheimer October 12, 1943 (Radio) Launch date April 19, 1948 (Television) Former NBC Blue names Network Picture 480i (16:9 SDTV) format 720p (HDTV) Official abc.go.com Website The American Broadcasting Company (ABC) is an American commercial broadcasting television network. Created in 1943 from the former NBC Blue radio network, ABC is owned by The Walt Disney Company and is part of Disney-ABC Television Group. Its first broadcast on television was in 1948. As one of the Big Three television networks, its programming has contributed to American popular culture. Corporate headquarters is in the Upper West Side of Manhattan in New York City,[1] while programming offices are in Burbank, California adjacent to the Walt Disney Studios and the corporate headquarters of The Walt Disney Company. The formal name of the operation is American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and that name appears on copyright notices for its in-house network productions and on all official documents of the company, including paychecks and contracts. -
Reconciling Cultural Diversity and Free Trade in the Digital Age: a Cultural Analysis of the International Trade in Content Items Claire Wright
The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals July 2015 Reconciling Cultural Diversity and Free Trade in the Digital Age: A Cultural Analysis of the International Trade in Content Items Claire Wright Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Claire (2008) "Reconciling Cultural Diversity and Free Trade in the Digital Age: A Cultural Analysis of the International Trade in Content Items," Akron Law Review: Vol. 41 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol41/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Wright: Reconciling Cultural Diversity and Free Trade WRIGHT_FINAL 3/23/2009 2:40 PM RECONCILING CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND FREE TRADE IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN CONTENT ITEMS Claire Wright* I. Introduction ....................................................................... 401 II. Background Information.................................................... 415 A. Cultural Diversity on the Global Level ....................... 415 B. International Media Conglomerates ............................ 420 C. Global Content Markets .............................................. 428 D. Digital Technology ..................................................... 432 III. Cultural Studies ................................................................. 439 A. Cultural Studies as a Discipline ................................. -
“Oscar ® ” and “Academyawards
“OSCAR®” AND “ACADEMY AWARDS®” ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF THE ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES, AND USED WITH PERMISSION. THIS IS NOT AN ACADEMY RELEASE. A SISTER BELGIUM /16MINS/2018 Native Title: UNE SOEUR Director: DElphiNE GiRaRD Producers: JacqUES-hENRi BRONckaRt (VERSUS pRODUctiON) Synopsis: a night. a car. alie is in trouble. to get by she must make the most important call of her life. Director’s Biography: Born in the heart of the French-canadian winter, Delphine Girard moved to Belgium a few years later. after starting her studies as an actress, she transferred to the directing department at the iNSaS in Brussels. her graduation film, MONSTRE , won several awards in Belgium and around the world. after leaving the school, she worked on several films as an assistant director, children's coach or casting director ("Our children" by Joachim lafosse, "Mothers’ instinct" by Olivier Masset-Depasse) while writing and directing the short film CAVERNE , adapted from a short story by the american author holly Goddard Jones. A SISTER is her second short film. She is currently working on her first feature and a fiction series. Awards: Jury Prize - Saguenay IFF (Canada) Grand Prize Rhode Island IFF (USA) Best International Short Film Sulmona IFF (Italy) Grand Prize Jury SPASM Festival (Canada) Best Short Film, Public Prize, Be tv Prize, University of Namur Prize - Namur Film Festival (Belgium) Public Prize & Special mention by press - BSFF (Belgium) Best Belgian Short Film RamDam FF (Belgium) Prize Creteil Film Festival Festivals/Screenings: -
Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-13 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter Of
Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-13 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 04-227 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) ELEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: January 14, 2005 Released: February 4, 2005 By the Commission: Chairman Powell issuing a statement; Commissioners Copps and Adelstein concurring and issuing a joint statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................1 A. Scope of this Report..................................................................................................................2 B. Summary of Findings ..............................................................................................................4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2004 ...................................................................4 2 General Findings .........................................................................................................7 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING......16 A. Cable Television Service.......................................................................................................16 1. General Performance.................................................................................................17 2. Capital Acquisition and Disposition.........................................................................33 -
Download (954Kb)
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 28.7.2004 SEC(2004) 1016 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER Annex to the Sixth Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC "Television without Frontiers", as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 2001-2002 {COM(2004)524 final} EN EN TABLE OF ANNEXES ANNEX 1 - Performance indicators ........................................................................................ 4 ANNEX 2 - Tables on the application of Articles 4 and 5 ...................................................... 6 ANNEX 3 - Application of Articles 4 and 5 in each Member State........................................ 8 ANNEX 4 - Summary of the reports from the Member States.............................................. 39 ANNEX 5 - Summary of the reports from the Member States of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area ................... 114 ANNEX 6 - List of television channels in the European Union Member States which failed to achieve the majority proportion according to Article 4 ..................... 118 ANNEX 7 – Average transmission time of European works according to Article 4 taking audience shares of channels into account (“de-minimis-criterion”) .... 128 ANNEX 8 – List of television channels in the European Union Member States which failed to achieve the minimum proportion according to article 5 ................... 132 EN 2 EN This document complements the Sixth Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC 1 of 3 October 1989, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC 2 - hereinafter referred to as the “Television without frontiers” Directive - for the period 2001-2002. -
Sechzehnter Jahresbericht
K E K Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich Sechzehnter Jahresbericht Berichtszeitraum 1. Juli 2012 bis 30. Juni 2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Überblick………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 2 Medienkonzentrationskontrolle durch die KEK…………………………………………….... 5 2.1 Verfassungsrechtliche Grundlage………………………………………………………………………... 5 2.2 Aufgaben der KEK nach dem Rundfunkstaatsvertrag…………………………………………………. 5 2.3 Mitglieder der KEK………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.4 Organisation………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 3 Verfahren im Berichtszeitraum……………………………………………….…………………… 9 3.1 Zulassung von Fernsehveranstaltern…………………………………………………………… 9 3.1.1 VIMN Germany GmbH – „MTV BRANDNEW“ (Az.: KEK 694)………………………………………. 9 3.1.2 Your Family Entertainment AG – „RIC“ (Az.: KEK 709)……………………………………………… 10 3.1.3 Gute Laune TV GmbH – „Gute Laune TV“ (Az.: KEK 707)…………………………………………. 10 3.1.4 FC Bayern München AG – „FCB.TV“ (Az.: KEK 705)………………………………………………... 11 3.1.5 The History Channel Germany GmbH & Co. KG – „History“ (Az.: KEK 706)……………………… 12 3.1.6 The Walt Disney Company (Germany) GmbH – „Disney Junior und Disney XD“ (Az.: KEK 714)……………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 3.1.7 FTL Farhad Television Live GmbH – „FTL“ (Az.: KEK 715)………………………………………… 14 3.1.8 RTL Television GmbH – „RTL Television“ (Az.: KEK 711)………………………………………….. 14 3.1.9 WM Broadcasting GmbH – „Europa Center TV“ (Az.: KEK 716)……………………………………. 15 3.1.10 amazing discoveries e.V. – „amazing discoveries TV“ (Az.: KEK 725)…………………………….. 15 3.1.11 ProSiebenSat.1 TV Deutschland GmbH - „SAT.1 Gold“ (Az.: KEK 724)………………………....... 16 3.1.12 Discovery Communications Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG – „DMAX“ (Az.: KEK 729)…………… 16 3.1.13 RTL II Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG – „RTL II“ (Az.: KEK 732)………………………………………. 16 3.1.14 Autentic GmbH – „Cinedom“ (Az.: KEK 718)………………………………………………………….. 18 3.1.15 APG-Allgemeine gemeinnützige Programmgesellschaft mbH – „katholisch.de“ (Az.: KEK 734) .............................................................................................................................. -
FCC 97-423, CS Docket No. 97-141
Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-423 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of ) CS Docket No. 97-141 Competition in Markets for the ) Delivery of Video Programming ) FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: December 31, 1997 Released: January 13, 1998 By the Commission: Chairman Kennard and Commissioners Ness, Furtchgott-Roth and Tristani issuing separate statements. Table of Contents Paragraph I. Introduction ............................................................ 1 A. Scope of this Report ............................................... 2 B. Summary of Findings and Reccommendations ............................ 6 II. Competitors in Markets for the Delivery of Video Programming .................... 12 A. Cable Industry ................................................... 12 B. Direct Broadcast Satellite Service ..................................... 54 C. Home Satellite Dishes .............................................. 68 D. Wireless Cable Systems ........................................... 71 1. Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service ...................... 71 2. Local Multipoint Distribution Service ............................ 79 E. Satellite Master Antenna Television Systems ............................. 82 F. Broadcast Television Service ......................................... 90 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-423 G. Other Entrants ................................................... 97 1. Internet Video ............................................. -
Zulassungsanträge Der VIVA Plus Gmbh Für Die Fernsehprogramme MTV, Nick, Nickelodeon Und VH-1 Classic Sowie Anmeldung Von Beteiligungsveränderungen
Zulassungsanträge der VIVA Plus GmbH für die Fernsehprogramme MTV, Nick, Nickelodeon und VH-1 Classic sowie Anmeldung von Beteiligungsveränderungen Aktenzeichen: KEK 363 Beschluss In der Rundfunkangelegenheit der VIVA Plus Fernsehen GmbH und der VIVA Fernsehen GmbH, jeweils vertreten durch die Geschäftsführerin Catherine Mühlemann, Schanzenstraße 22, 51063 Köln, - Veranstalterinnen - Bevollmächtigte: xxx ... w e g e n Zulassung der bundesweiten Fernsehprogramme MTV, Nick, Nickelodeon und VH-1 Classic sowie Beteiligungsveränderungen hat die Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (KEK) auf Vorlagen der Hamburgischen Anstalt für neue Medien (HAM) auch namens der Medienanstalt Berlin- Brandenburg (mabb) und der Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM) beide vom 11.09.2006 in der Sitzung am 10.10.2006 unter Mitwirkung ihrer Mitglieder Prof. Dr. Dörr (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Huber, Dr. Lübbert, Prof. Dr. Mailänder, Dr. Rath-Glawatz und Prof. Dr. Sjurts entschieden: I. Der von der VIVA Plus Fernsehen GmbH mit Schreiben vom 21.08.2006 bei der Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM) beantragten Zulassung zur Veranstaltung der bundesweit verbreiteten Fernsehprogramme MTV, Nick, Ni- ckelodeon und VH-1 Classic stehen Gründe der Sicherung der Meinungsvielfalt im Fernsehen nicht entgegen. 2 II. Die von der HAM und der LfM jeweils mit Schreiben vom 11.09.2006 zur Beurtei- lung nach dem Rundfunkstaatsvertrag (RStV) vorgelegten und mit Schreiben der Veranstalterinnen vom 29.09.2006 ergänzend angemeldeten Beteiligungsverän- -
995 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels,23.9.2010 SEC(2010)995final COMMISSIONSTAFFWORKINGDOCUMENT Accompanyingdocumenttothe COMMUNICATIONFROMTHECOMMISSIONTOTHE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,THECOUNCIL,THEEUROPEANECONOMIC ANDSOCIAL COMMITTEEANDTHECOMMITTEEOFTHEREGIONS NinthCommunication ontheapplicationofArticles4and5ofDirective89/552/EECas amendedbyDirective97/36/ECandDirective2007/65/EC,fortheperiod2007-2008 (PromotionofEuropeanandindependentaudiovisual works) COM(2010)450final EN EN COMMISSIONSTAFFWORKINGDOCUMENT Accompanyingdocumenttothe COMMUNICATIONFROMTHECOMMISSIONTOTHE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,THECOUNCIL,THEEUROPEANECONOMIC ANDSOCIAL COMMITTEEANDTHECOMMITTEEOFTHEREGIONS NinthCommunication ontheapplicationofArticles4and5ofDirective89/552/EECas amendedbyDirective97/36/ECandDirective2007/65/EC,fortheperiod20072008 (PromotionofEuropeanandindependentaudiovisual works) EN 2 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS ApplicationofArticles 4and5ineachMemberState ..........................................................5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................5 1. ApplicationofArticles 4and5:generalremarks ...................................................5 1.1. MonitoringmethodsintheMemberStates ..................................................................6 1.2. Reasonsfornon-compliance ........................................................................................7 1.3. Measures plannedor adoptedtoremedycasesofnoncompliance .............................8 1.4. Conclusions