DOCSLIB.ORG

A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 4 Number 2 JAAER Winter 1994 Article 1 Winter 1994 A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan Atef Ghobrial Ken Fleming Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Scholarly Commons Citation Ghobrial, A., & Fleming, K. (1994). A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan. Journal of Aviation/ Aerospace Education & Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.1994.1118 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ghobrial and Fleming: A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan A MODEL FOR DEVELOPING ANAIRPORT SECURI7Y PLAN Atef Ghobrial and Ken Fleming In order to protect passengers, staff, airlines, aircraft, and property, airports should develop, implement, and maintain a system security plan. The plan should be a complete guide for establishing and maintaining a comprehensive security program for the airport system. Increased security should be accomplished through the use of a system approach, with both proactive and law enforcement activities clearly outlined in the plan. This paper presents a model for developing an airport security plan. INTRODUCTION devices or weapons. The new Public Law 99-83, the Not long ago, security problems at airports were International Security and Development Cooperation confined to conventional crimes associated with other Act of 1985, established an explicit statutory basis for the transportation modes: vandalism, theft, assault and FAA's Federal Air Marshal program. The Public Law battery, trespassing, and facility damage. Since the late 99-83 was enacted in August 1985 to direct the Secretary 19608, airports have also become the focus of other of Transportation to assess the effectiveness of security crimes, such as terrorism, hijacking, sabotage of targets measures at foreign airports served by U.S. carriers, or in the air and on the ground, and overt acts of from which foreign air carriers serve the United States, aggression. Between 1963 and 1971, the Assembly ofthe and those airports that pose high risk to international International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) called travelers. In 1989, the FAAissued its final rule requiring three major meetings for the purpose of drafting foreign air carriers to submit their security programs (in International Conventions on the security of civil writing and inEnglish) to the FAAfor acceptance by the aviation: The Tokyo Convention (1963), the Hague Administrator. Convention (1970), and theMontreal Convention (1971). GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING In 1974, a set ofstandards and recommended procedures AN AIRPORT SECURI'IY PlAN was adopted by ICAO. The document was published as In order to protect passengers, staff, airlines, aircraft, Annex 17 to the original Chicago Convention. The and property, airports should develop, implement and document is titled "Standards and Recommended Prac­ maintain a system security plan. Increased security tices-Security-SafeguardingCivilAviationAgainstAets should be accomplished through the use of a system of Unlawful Interference." approach with both proactive and law enforcement In 1969, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) activities clearly outlined in the plan. A system is established a Task Force on Deterrence ofAir Piracy. In composed of people, property, environment, and 1971, the FAA issued notices of proposal rule-making procedures that are integrated to perform a specific for the landmark revisions of the airport and airline operational function in a specific environment. The security measures. One notice proposed the issuance of elements of a system are diverse and interactive. A Part 107 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to give to successful airport security plan should integrate and airport operators the responsibility for providing coordinate the functions of each element in the system. protection against unauthorized access to air operations The airport security plan is a well-defined program areas. The second notice proposed a new Section 538 to that describes the actions to be taken to protect airlines, FAR Part 121, which required each scheduled carrier to passengers, staff, aircraft, and property against terrorist develop and implement a security program designed to or criminal acts. Security plans should not be viewed as prevent or deter the carriage aboard aircraft ofsabotage a set of theoretical procedures to follow, rather they JAAER, Winter 1994 Page 27 Published by Scholarly Commons, 1994 1 Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, Vol. 4, No. 2 [1994], Art. 1 A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan should define the objectives of the program and give directive/policy statement that establishes full enough flexibility to deal with particular events. Because commitment to security. The plan also directs timing, situations, or locations ofunlawful acts cannot be responsibility for security to an individual or a group forecast, it is necessary to leave the detailed course of and indicates full support for them. The security actions to those persons in charge of airport security. classification and copy number should appear The main objective is to ensure that the actions taken to prominently at the top of each copy of the document. safeguard the facility are coordinated with the overall Introduction to Airport System Security plan. Purpose ofAirport Security Plan In developing a security plan, lead security personnel An airport security plan is of limited value unless it at the airport should consult with the FAA, the ICAO, fully defines and implements a security program. The and other security professionals, and should review plan should emphasize identifying potential threats and security plans at similar airports. Next, authors of the areas of wlnerability, and developing proactive, security plan should collect all of the appropriate prevention-oriented approaches thatwill minimize them. security-related information within the airport. This threat and vulnerability management, as applied to This information includes the location ofthe airport, all aspects of people, property, prOcedures, and the type of traffic, the passenger mix (domestic and environment ofthe airport, is known as "system security. n international), the resources of the airport, and the Goals, Objectives and Tasks ofthe Plan capabilities of the different groups overseeing airport The primary goal of the plan, of course, is to security. implement a program that ensures system security. Broad The next step is to write the specific sections of the yet airport-specific objectives supporting thatgoal should plan. There is no standard format or layout; however, be identified; each objective should include a set of security personnel should be able to find all references reasonable and attainable tasks to achieve that objective. to their roles and responsibilities easily and quickly. The For example, the objective of a plan could be to ensure outline can be adjusted as appropriate to suit the the security of an airport or an airline against unlawful circumstances of a particular airport. acts at maximum cost-effectiveness. DEVELOPING AN AIRPORT SECURTIY PLAN Scope ofthe Plan The need for developing an airport security plan has This section should summarize the intent ofthe plan, been emphasized in many aviation management books and list personnel involved and their functions, and what (Moore, 1991; Phipps, 1991; Wells, 1992). This paper organizations are affected. provides a model for developing an airport security plan. Description of the Airport System It presents an outline of an airport security program Organizational Structure followed by a description of the different sections A brief description, preferably with a diagram, of the comprising the plan. organizations of the airport, including security Opening Pages to the Airport Security Plan committees. The opening pages ofthe security plan should include Operating Environment acknowledgment, a foreword, and a management policy Detailed information about flights by type (domestic statement. The author should acknowledge those and international), current and projected flight schedule, professionals, local and state and federal agencies, and estimated number of passengers, types of airlines international organizations that contributed to (domestic and international), political systems of developing the security plan. The foreword section countries whose airlines operate at the airport, high-risk should provide a clear understanding of how the plan is flights and so on. expected to serve as the dynamic structure for This section should also include a briefdescription of implementing an effective system security program. The the airport, including configuration, ground access, opening pages should also contain a management terminal facilities, and airside layout. Page 28 JAAER, Winter 1994 https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol4/iss2/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.1994.1118 2 Ghobrial and Fleming: A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan A Model for Developing an Airport Security Plan Current Security Conditions Training A summary containing the current security breaches, Describe the different training programs for everyone threats, and likely forms of terrorist or criminal involved in airport
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vietnam Border Management > Case Study
    Vietnam border management > Case study Vietnam’s airports experience improved border security with Rockwell Collins solution. A CRITICAL BALANCE CHALLENGE: Governments everywhere know that national security threats are > Significant growth in air passenger travel combined with manual out there, but being able to recognize who and what constitutes a processes created potential increases in airport security risks. threat – and to contain it before it reaches the border – is critical to securing a country’s citizens, infrastructure and economy. SOLUTION: > With the Rockwell Collins solution, Vietnam has improved its Governments of countries like Vietnam, with its air traffic ability to counter threats by pre-screening passenger/crew data passenger numbers surging (up 29 percent to 52 million in 20161), before arrival at immigration checkpoints as well as improved understand the potential issues this increase in travelers poses to passenger flow at airports. its security. Government officials in Vietnam are working hard to balance the ability to protect its borders and detect threats with RESULTS: the economic benefits associated with tourism and the growth > As a result of the implementation of the Rockwell Collins’ ARINC of the country’s aviation industry. Border Management Solution (ABMS), Vietnam’s international airports have seen a 90 percent improvement in passenger processing times and a 95 percent improvement in data quality compared with the previous manually handled data. rockwellcollins.com/airports As a result of pre-clearance of passenger details, Vietnam’s international airports have seen a 90 percent improvement in passenger processing times and a 95 percent improvement in data quality compared with the previous manually-handled data.
    [Show full text]
  • Reno – Stead Airport
    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Runway to Recovery
    Runway to Recovery The United States Framework for Airlines and Airports to Mitigate the Public Health Risks of Coronavirus Guidance Jointly Issued by the U.S. Departments of Transportation, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services Version 1.1 | December 2020 CONTENTS – 03 Overview 07 Principles 09 Air Transportation Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities 11 A Risk-Based Approach for COVID-19 Outbreak Mitigation Planning 14 Public Health Risk Mitigation in the Passenger Air Transportation System 49 Future Areas of Research and Evaluation for Public Health Risk Mitigations 51 Implementation Challenges Specific to International Travel 53 Appendix A: Key Partners and Decision-Makers OVERVIEW A safe, secure, efficient, and resilient air transportation system is essential to our Nation’s physical, economic, and social health. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency has demonstrated that protecting public health in the air transportation system is just as critical as aviation safety and security to the confidence of the flying public. Government, aviation, and public health leaders have been working together—and must continue to do so—to meaningfully reduce the public health risk and restore passenger, aviation workforce (including aircrew), and public confidence in air travel. The U.S. Government continues to assess the evolving situation and the effectiveness of actions and recommendations implemented to date. This updated guidance reflects this continual assessment and updated information. Although there are some updates and adjustments throughout, the key additions and changes in this document include new information on: » Passenger and Aviation Workforce Education » Contact Tracing » Mask Use, specifically the need to accommodate those who cannot wear masks » Passenger Testing This document provides the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Security, Safety, Lighting and Incident Management
    Airport Security, Safety, Lighting and Incident Management Airport Security Vision Statement Increase airport efficiency and establish the highest level of security while maintaining: ▪ Passenger flow and flight schedules ▪ High level of passenger service satisfaction ▪ High revenue based on airport concessions - Maximized passenger free time The Airport Environment • Terminals • Transportation centers • Critical sites Multiple Locations • Airport • City • Airline companies Multiple Stakeholders • Airport Security personnel • Law enforcement agencies Multiple Authorities • Local and national authorities • Terror Multiple Threats • Crime • Drug Smuggling Potential of Mass Casualties • Large number of passengers • Vital and critical Locations • National gateway The Threat Aviation transportation faces multiple threats Airports act as gateways to countries, states and cities Configured as international, national or local Airports are central hubs for the transfer of valuables and goods in and out of countries Criminal activity in airports and their surrounding infrastructure, is also on the increase The Vulnerability (some examples of Terror threats) Anti-tank missile Shooting attack Car bomb / Suicide MANPAD from perimeter inside terminal bomber Coercion Hijacking Telephone threat Cyber threat The Vulnerability (some examples of Criminal threat) Violence Theft Smuggling Contraband The Solution Airport Operations • Prepare, predict, prevent and manage any potential event • Decision support and process management • Increase revenues by
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing the Airport Ecosystem a New Airline Industry Report Contents
    Reinventing the Airport Ecosystem A new airline industry report Contents Executive Summary 4 Research Methodology 6 1. Macro Trends and Impacting Factors 7 2.4 Identifying passengers in the airport 1.1 Political factors 8 environment 26 > Open skies 8 2.5 Communicating with passengers 26 > State capitalism 8 2.6 Additional developments to enhance the 1.2 Economic factors 9 airport experience 27 > Economic outlook 9 > Create a ‘sense of place’ 27 > Global growth 9 > Personalisation 27 > Wealth distribution 9 > Sustainability 28 > Centre of power 9 > Non-aeronautical revenue generation 28 > Economic globalisation 9 > Airline profitability 10 3. Industry Drivers Shaping Ecosystem 1.3 Social factors 11 Architecture & Strategies 35 > Global population 11 3.1 The importance of non-aeronautical revenues 35 > Passenger numbers 11 > Airports 35 > Ageing population 12 > Airlines 36 > Global middle class 12 > Airlines/airports revenue sharing 37 1.4 Technological & Scientific factors 13 3.2 New approaches to finance investment 38 > Evolution of personal mobile ecosystems 13 > Turning owned assets into rented services 38 > Delivery of information & communication > Auctions 38 to the mobile device 13 > Crowd sourced financing 38 > Use of social media 13 3.3 Enhancing the passenger experience 38 > Connecting communities 14 > On the security front 38 > Passenger attitudes to technology 15 > On the sustainability front 38 > How airports will adapt and accommodate 3.4 New approaches to operations 39 the future 15 > Collaborative decision making 39 > Technology infrastructure 17 > New terminal design 39 1.5 Environmental factors 18 > Fuel price volatility 18 4. Mapping Strategic Direction for the > Environmental sustainability 18 Next 20 Years 40 1.6 Legislative factors 19 4.1 Adopting a long term perspective? 40 > Global regulation 19 4.2 Defining the ecosystem architecture 40 > Airline alliances 19 > Conceptual model 41 > Infrastructure model 42 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Senate of the United States, AMENDMENT
    In the Senate of the United States, September 25, 1998. Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representa- tives (H.R. 4057) entitled ``An Act to amend title 49, United States Code, to reauthorize programs of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following AMENDMENT: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF SECTIONS. 2 (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the 3 ``Wendell H. Ford National Air Transportation System Im- 4 provement Act of 1998''. 5 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.ÐThe table of sections for this 6 Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of sections. Sec. 2. Amendments to title 49, United States Code. TITLE IÐAUTHORIZATIONS Sec. 101. Federal Aviation Administration operations. Sec. 102. Air navigation facilities and equipment. Sec. 103. Airport planning and development and noise compatibility planning and programs. Sec. 104. Reprogramming notification requirement. 2 Sec. 105. Airport security program. Sec. 106. Contract tower programs Sec. 107. Automated surface observation system stations. TITLE IIÐAIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENTS Sec. 201. Removal of the cap on discretionary fund. Sec. 202. Innovative use of airport grant funds. Sec. 203. Matching share. Sec. 204. Increase in apportionment for noise compatibility planning and pro- grams. Sec. 205. Technical amendments. Sec. 206. Repeal of period of applicability. Sec. 207. Report on efforts to implement capacity enhancements. Sec. 208. Prioritization of discretionary projects. Sec. 209. Public notice before grant assurance requirement waived. Sec. 210. Definition of public aircraft. Sec. 211. Terminal development costs. Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Security
    CHAPTER 9 SECURITY 157 CHAPTER 9 SECURITY 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................159 2. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................160 3. THE PARTIES INVOLVED – BASIC ROLES ................................................................... 161 3.1 The Airport ................................................................................................................161 3.2 Aircraft Operators/ Air Carriers ..................................................................................162 4. THE GENERAL REGULATORY/STATUTORY SCHEME ................................................165 5. DEFINITION AND TERMS ...............................................................................................166 6. ICAO STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES ..............................................168 7. SPECIFIC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OF THE MAJOR PARTIES RE: AIR CARGO SECURITY AT AIRPORTS .....................................................................................................169 8. NON-REGULATORY SECURITY BEST PRACTICES FOR AIR CARGO ........................ 170 8.1 Employee Issues: .....................................................................................................170 8.2 Non-Employee Issues: ..............................................................................................170 8.3 Physical/Equipment Issues: ......................................................................................171
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY June 2012 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY June 2012 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 5 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………..................................................8 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 9 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 11 VI. U.S. CONGRESS .................................................................................................... 12 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 14 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 15 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 17 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 19 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-20-275, Aviation Security: TSA Could Strengthen Its Insider Threat
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters February 2020 AVIATION SECURITY TSA Could Strengthen Its Insider Threat Program by Developing a Strategic Plan and Performance Goals GAO-20-275 February 2020 AVIATION SECURITY TSA Could Strengthen Its Insider Threat Program by Developing a Strategic Plan and Performance Goals Highlights of GAO-20-275, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Aviation workers using their access The Transportation Security Administration (TSA), airport operators, and air privileges to exploit vulnerabilities and carriers mitigate insider threats through a variety of efforts. TSA’s Insider Threat potentially cause harm at the nation’s Program comprises multiple TSA offices with ongoing insider threat mitigation airports is known as an “insider activities, including long-standing requirements addressing access controls and threat.” TSA, airport operators, and background checks, and compliance inspections. TSA also initiated activities air carriers share the responsibility to more recently, such as implementing TSA-led, randomized worker screenings in mitigate all insider threats at airports. 2018. Airport and air carrier officials implement security measures in accordance In October 2019, TSA estimated with TSA-approved programs and may implement additional measures to further there are about 1.8 million aviation mitigate threats. For example, many airport operators reported using workers at the nation’s airports. sophisticated access control technologies (e.g. fingerprint readers). Additionally, GAO was asked to review TSA’s and some air carriers reported conducting more rigorous background checks prior to aviation stakeholders’ efforts to issuing identification credentials to employees. mitigate insider threats at airports.
    [Show full text]
  • US-EU Air Transport: Open Skies but Still Not Open Transatlantic Air Services.”
    “US-EU Air Transport: Open Skies But Still Not Open Transatlantic Air Services.” Julia Anna Hetlof Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University, Montreal August 2009 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of LL.M in Air and Space Law. © Julia Hetlof, 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgments Abstract/Resume Bibliography TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 PART 1: DEREGULATION AND LIBERALIZATION OF AIR TRANSPORT REGIMES IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN UNION............................4 I. EVOLUTION OF U.S. AIR TRANSPORTATION REGIME: REGULATION, DEREGULATION AND THE PRESENT. ….........................................................5 1. 1938-1978 Era of Governmental Regulation.................................................5 2. 1978 Deregulation of U.S. Domestic Airline Industry..................................8 3. Post-Deregulation Airline Industry Outlook...............................................10 4. Re-regulation or other proposals for Change?............................................12 II. LIBERALIZATION OF AIR TRANSPORTATION REGIME IN THE EUROPEAN UNION............................................................................................15 1. Introduction/History......................................................................................15 2. Liberalization of European Air Transport Market: Three Packages.......16 2.1 First Package (1987)............................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Facial Recognition
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2020 FACIAL RECOGNITION CBP and TSA are Taking Steps to Implement Programs, but CBP Should Address Privacy and System Performance Issues GAO-20-568 September 2020 FACIAL RECOGNITION CBP and TSA are Taking Steps to Implement Programs, but CBP Should Address Privacy and Highlights of GAO-20-568, a report to System Performance Issues congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Within the Department of Homeland U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has made progress testing and Security (DHS), CBP is charged with deploying facial recognition technology (FRT) at ports of entry to create entry-exit the dual mission of facilitating records for foreign nationals as part of its Biometric Entry-Exit Program. As of legitimate travel and securing U.S. May 2020, CBP, in partnership with airlines, had deployed FRT to 27 airports to borders, and TSA is responsible for biometrically confirm travelers’ identities as they depart the United States (air protecting the nation’s transportation exit) and was in the early stages of assessing FRT at sea and land ports of entry. system. For both CBP and TSA, part of their inspection and screening responsibilities includes reviewing Facial Recognition Technology in Use at an Airport travel identification documents and verifying traveler identities. Beginning in 1996, a series of federal laws were enacted to develop and implement an entry-exit data system, which is to integrate biographic and, since 2004, biometric records for foreign nationals. This report addresses (1) the status of CBP’s deployment of FRT, (2) the extent to which CBP has incorporated privacy protection principles, (3) the extent to which CBP has assessed the accuracy and performance of its FRT, and (4) the status of TSA’s testing and deployment of FRT and how TSA has incorporated privacy protection principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief of Airport Security Police
    Shreveport Airport Authority 5103 Hollywood Ave., Suite 300 | Shreveport, LA 71109 Phone (318) 673-5370 | Fax (318) 673-5377 Shreveport Regional Airport/Shreveport Downtown Municipal Airport Chief, Airport Police _____________________________________________________________________________________ SALARY: $80,000.00 (+ $6,000 State Supplemental Pay contingent upon LA state POST) OPENING DATE: Monday, February 24, 2020 CLOSING DATE: Friday, March 6, 2020 4:30 PM JOB TITLE: Chief, Airport Police (Appointed) The Shreveport Airport Authority (SAA) in Shreveport, Louisiana is conducting a search for Chief, Airport Police. The Chief, Airport Police serves as the top sworn officer for the Shreveport Airport Authority (SAA). This position manages all activities of the Airport Police Department (APD) and ensures the Airport’s compliance with Transportation Security Regulation (TSR) Part 1542 and support of Federal Aviation Regulation Part 139, or other legislative regulations and complementary Airport Authority rules, policies and procedures; that provide the basis for safe, secure, orderly and efficient operation of the Authority’s system of airports. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This position reports to the Director of Airports as Manager, Security and Police Services and is responsible for the enforcement of laws and security regulations; traffic operations; airport security compliance and support; and the overall leadership and administration of airport law enforcement functions. The incumbent is part of the SAA leadership team and is expected to maintain highly effective relationships with SAA leadership, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), airline management and airport tenants. In addition, the incumbent must be willing to engage, develop and maintain professional relationships with law enforcement peers on the local, state and federal level.
    [Show full text]