DOCSLIB.ORG

A131 Braintree to Sudbury RBS Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A131 Braintree to Sudbury RBS Business Case Capital Project Business Case A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy The template This document provides the business case template for projects seeking funding which is made available through the South East Local Enterprise Partnership. It is therefore designed to satisfy all SELEP governance processes, approvals by the Strategic Board, the Accountability Board and also the early requirements of the Independent Technical Evaluation process where applied. It is also designed to be applicable across all funding streams made available by Government through SELEP. It should be filled in by the scheme promoter – defined as the final beneficiary of funding. In most cases, this is the local authority; but in some cases the local authority acts as Accountable Body for a private sector final beneficiary. In those circumstances, the private sector beneficiary would complete this application and the SELEP team would be on hand, with local partners in the federated boards, to support the promoter. Please note that this template should be completed in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the HM Treasury’s Green Book. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book- appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent As described below, there are likely to be two phases of completion of this template. The first, an ‘outline business case’ stage, should see the promoter include as much information as would be appropriate for submission though SELEP to Government calls for projects where the amount awarded to the project is not yet known. If successful, the second stage of filling this template in would be informed by clarity around funding and would therefore require a fully completed business case, inclusive of the economic appraisal which is sought below. At this juncture, the business case would therefore dovetail with SELEP’s Independent Technical Evaluation process and be taken forward to funding and delivery. A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Business Case Page 1 of 43 The process This document forms the initial SELEP part of a normal project development process. The four steps in the process are defined below in simplified terms as they relate specifically to the LGF process. Note – this does not illustrate background work undertaken locally, such as evidence base development, baselining and local management of the project pool and reflects the working reality of submitting funding bids to Government. In the form that follows: •Consideration of long list of projects, submitted with a short strategic level business case •Sifting/shortlisting process using a common assessment framework agreed by SELEP Strategic Board, with projects either discounted, sent back for further development, directed Local Board to other funding routes or agreed for submission to SELEP Decision •Pipeline of locally assessed projects submitted to SELEP, with projects supported by strategic outline business cases - i.e., partial completion of this template •Prioritisation of projects across SELEP, following a common assessment framework agreed by Strategic Board. SELEP •Single priorisited list of projects is submitted by SELEP to Government once agreed with SELEP Strategic Board. •Following the allocation of LGF to a project, scheme promoters are required to prepare an outline business case, using this template together with appropriate annexes. •Outline Business Case assessed through ITE gate process. •Recommendations are made by SELEP ITE to SELEP Accountability Board for the SELEP ITE award of funding. •Lead delivery partner to commence internal project management, governance and reporting, ensuring exception reporting mechanism back to SELEP Accountability Board and working arrangements with SELEP Capital Programme Manager. Funding & •Full Business Case is required following the procurement stage for projects with an LGF Delivery allocation over £8m. Version control A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Document ID Business Case Version Gate 1 Version 1 – 180326 Author Dave Joy Document status Final Authorised by Date authorised A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Business Case Page 2 of 43 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1. Project name: A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Business Case 1.2. Project type: A transport package with safety and highways improvements to key junctions along the A131 corridor, together with enhancements to cycling and pedestrian crossing provision. 1.3. Federated Board Area: Essex 1.4. Lead County Council / Unitary Authority: Essex County Council 1.5. Development location: The A131 corridor from Marks Farm Roundabout, Braintree to the Suffolk border just south of Sudbury. 1.6. Project Summary: The purpose of this bid is to deliver a package of schemes to improve safety and reduce delays along the A131 corridor from Braintree to the Suffolk border, just south of Sudbury. The A131 is the primary route from Braintree, through Halstead, to Sudbury as shown in Figure 1 below. The route covers 13.5 miles (21.6 km), along which there is one roundabout, three mini roundabouts, a signalised junction, two zebra crossings and one signalised pedestrian crossing. Braintree is undergoing significant growth and there is the potential for exponential growth with the adoption of a new garden community to the west of Braintree. The A131, leaving the north of Braintree, also provides an essential commercial link, via the A1017, on to the A14 and the M11. Similarly, there are significant growth plans for Sudbury, which, together with developments in Halstead (the main town) halfway between the two destinations, will put increased pressure on the capacity and performance of this corridor. The key junctions along the routes, from south to north, are as follows: Marks Farm roundabout – this important four-arm roundabout provides a key link at the eastern side of Braintree, to the A120 southwards to Chelmsford, westwards to Bishops Stortford and Stansted, and the A120 eastwards towards Coggeshall, Marks Tey and the A12. Broad Road roundabout – a three-arm roundabout providing access to Bocking and north Braintree. High Garrett – a three-arm signalised intersection, where the A1017 splits off towards Haverhill and subsequently the A11. Halstead – there are a number of minor junctions throughout the town, and, at the top of the High Street, there are two mini-roundabouts which connect the A1124 towards Earls Colne and Colchester, and the Hedingham Road towards Castle Hedingham and on to Haverhill. Halstead to Bulmer Tye – there are a number of minor country road intersections until the three- way junction between the A131 and the Hedingham Road, just south of Bulmer Tye, is reached. There is then only one additional minor intersection before the county boundary is reached, 800m south west of Sudbury. A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Business Case Page 3 of 43 Figure 1: A131 Braintree to Sudbury Following a Route Based Strategy review, that was conducted during 2015, a workshop was held with stakeholders in early 2016 from which twenty potential improvement schemes were identified. After a sifting exercise, conducted using a tool based on the DfT East sifting tool, the options were prioritised and resulted in the following list of potential improvements:- Marks Farm – widening of the entry flare and addition of a left turn slip for traffic travelling south and then heading east to Colchester along the A120. Broad Road – improving entry and exit flares to improve traffic flow. High Garrett – safety improvements including improved bus stops and crossing points High Garrett junction with A1017 – improvements to layout, changes to signals and improved crossings and pedestrian facilities Halstead – improvements to parking facilities in the High Street Hedingham Road Junction – improvements to mini roundabout layouts to improve traffic flow Bulmer Tye – safety improvements. During 2017, and after further, more detailed discussions with the client and with Essex County Council’s Network Management, the list of options was reduced and the content modified to the following:- Marks Farm – widening of all four entry flares, introduction of a left turn slip from the A120 heading south and general improvements to the roundabout. Broad Road – improving entry flare from Broad Road and realignment to improve traffic flow. High Garrett junction with A1017 – major improvements to layout, changes to signals, relocated and improved crossings and pedestrian facilities Plaistow Green and Bulmer Tye – safety improvements, including improved signage and non- slip surfacing. A131 Braintree to Sudbury Route Based Strategy Business Case Page 4 of 43 Particularly, at the junctions near Braintree, there are capacity issues, which if not addressed, will only get worse with the impending developments that are scheduled. The issues in Halstead are a little more complex. There is a feeling that echelon parking in the High Street, with forward entry in and forward exit out, would resolve some of the issues with vehicles reversing into the main flow of traffic. However, because of delivery vehicles only being able to deliver from the High Street, and because, where echelon parking has been tried elsewhere, but not found to be successful, it has been agreed that this option will not be progressed. Also, because of significant land issues, it would not be possible to increase the highways boundary at this point, and, according to modelling results, introducing signals does not provide any benefit, because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 551 23 October 2012 No. 54 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 23 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 813 23 OCTOBER 2012 814 Mr Bone: The Conservative-led coalition Government House of Commons are increasing spending on the NHS, unlike what Labour would do. In my constituency, we will get an urgent care Tuesday 23 October 2012 centre in a few months as a result of Tory health reforms. People in Corby already have an urgent care centre as a result of Tory reforms. Does the Secretary of The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock State agree that, while Labour talks about the NHS, Conservatives deliver on the NHS? PRAYERS Mr Hunt: I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. Indeed, last week we announced that waiting times are [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] at near-record lows. The number of hospital-acquired infections continues to go down and mixed-sex wards have been virtually eliminated. I am very pleased that BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS my hon. Friend has an urgent care centre, and am sure that Mrs Bone will appreciate it even more than he does. NEW WRITs Ordered, Grahame M. Morris (Easington) (Lab): Does the That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the Secretary of State recognise that the Office for National Crown to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to Statistics survey shows that the
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Site Allocations & Development Management Plan
    Braintree District Council Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report – Non Technical Summary January 2013 Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Plan ........................................ 1 1.3 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 1 1.4 Progress to Date ................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Methodology........................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The Aim and Structure of this Report .................................................................................. 3 2 Sustainability Context, Baseline and Objectives.............................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plans & Programmes .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond Now We’Removing Informing, Engaging and Inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond
    Essex Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond now we’removing informing, engaging and inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond ‘I cannot think of a higher priority for the County Council than for it to strive to achieve a first class highways and transportation system for all who live in, work in or visit the county of Essex. The challenges in front of us are enormous. Over 130,000 new homes are being proposed for Essex and its borders with surrounding authorities, the travel needs of which will have a direct impact on the transport network in Essex. All aspects of passenger transport will play a key role in delivering this vision. The County Council has therefore produced three daughter strategies to support the Local Transport Plan, focusing on how passenger transport will contribute towards a fully integrated transport network. The Road Passenger Transport, Bus Information and Rail Strategies outline the ways in which we intend to improve the lives of Essex people by addressing traffic growth, road congestion and improving public transport. They contain measures aimed at improving options for travel and access to services to develop a more effective transport network. To produce the strategies the County Council has consulted widely at regional, district and parish level, with key service providers, a wide range of user groups and the general public so that collectively they represent a tangible commitment by Essex County Council to make our County a better place to live and work and to support a decent public transport network. I am committed to delivering a transport system that meets the challenges we face in Essex and look forward to working in partnership with stakeholders to bring about the transformation we now need.’ Councillor Rodney L.
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Borough Local Plan 2017 – 2033
    Publication Draft The Publication Draft stage of the Colchester Borough Local Plan 2017 – 2033 June 2017 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Local Plan: The Process ......................................................................................... 1 National planning guidance ................................................................................. 1 County Level Plans ............................................................................................. 2 Borough Strategies ............................................................................................. 3 Duty to Co-operate .............................................................................................. 3 Evidence Base .................................................................................................... 4 Sustainability Appraisal ....................................................................................... 4 Habitat Regulations Assessment ........................................................................ 5 Local Plan: Structure of the Plan and other related documents .............................. 5 Other Colchester Planning Documents ................................................................... 6 How to respond....................................................................................................... 7 What Happens Next? .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Braintree District Council April 2010 2010 Air Quality Progress Report for Braintree District Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management Date: April 2010 Progress Report i Date : April 2010 Braintree District Council - England Local Pam Sharp Authority Officer Department Environmental Health Dept Address Braintree District Council Causeway House Bocking End Braintree CM7 9HB Telephone 01376 551414 e-mail [email protected] Report BRA/PR2010 Reference Final Copy 01/Mar 29 number Date March 29th 2010 Report written by: Paul Hinsley Environment, Strategy and Highways Essex County Council County Hall Chelmsford Essex CM1 1QH On behalf of the : Essex Air Quality Consortium Monitoring Network. ii Progress Report Braintree District Council April 2010 Executive Summary This 2010 Progress Report of 2009 monitoring data showes that two exceedence of the NO2 annual mean objective level have been measured in 2009 at the Hatfield Peverel NO2 diffusion tube site situated next to the A12 and Chipping Hill in Witham. The data for Chipping Hill has been annualised to allow for the low data capture at this site There are no diffusion tube sites with annual mean NO2 concentrations in excess of 60 g/m3 in Braintree and it was considered unlikely that there will be any exceedences of the hourly NO2 objective. Pam I will leave it up to you to add words detailing what you want to do. Progress Report iii Date : April 2010 Braintree District Council - England Table of contents 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Description
    [Show full text]
  • Legal & Committee Services
    Appendix Anglia Level Crossing Reduction Strategy - Preferred Options Colchester Borough Council - detailed comments on Network Rail’s proposals The Main Line – London to Norwich • E25 Church 2 Copford/Marks Tey –no objection to closure The crossing is currently closed. The footpath which serves it has already been severed by the construction of the A12. An alternative route is already in place, and an additional route linking the footpath via Turkey Cock Lane is proposed. • E23 Long Green Marks Tey – no objection to closure The crossing has been replaced recently with a bridge. However we note that the design of the bridge used here is very functional and its form is very intrusive on the local environment. It is suggested that Network Rail seek an improved design for future structures used elsewhere. • E24 Church 1 Marks Tey – no objection to closure The crossing closed in 1989. The alternative route is via the new bridge 300m to the west. Sunshine Coast Line – Colchester to Clacton branch line • E 41 Paget Road – CBC does not object but seeks improvements to the alternative pedestrian routes. This crossing is used by a large number of local residents of Wivenhoe (approximately 220 a day). The alternative to the Paget Road crossing is Anglesea Road and High Street bridges approximately 90m and 180m east and west of the current crossing point. Anglesea Road is an unmade and unadopted road and Queens Road has an incline leading to Anglesea Road, making it difficult for less able people to negotiate. The alternative crossing point is the High Street bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • North Essex Garden Communities Employment & Demographic Studies
    Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council North Essex Garden Communities Employment & Demographic Studies Final Report April 2017 Cambridge Econometrics [email protected] Cambridge, UK www.camecon.com North Essex Garden Communities Employment & Demographic Studies Cambridge Econometrics’ mission is to provide rigorous, accessible and relevant independent economic analysis to support strategic planners and policy-makers in business and government, doing work that we are interested in and can be proud of. Cambridge Econometrics Limited is owned by a charitable body, the Cambridge Trust for New Thinking in Economics. www.neweconomicthinking.org Cambridge Econometrics and SQW 2 North Essex Garden Communities Employment & Demographic Studies Authorisation and Version History Version Date Authorised for Description release by 1.0 28/04/17 Mike May-Gillings Final Report (Associate Director) 3 North Essex Garden Communities Employment & Demographic Studies Contents Page 1 Introduction 9 2 Demographic modelling 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 The Chelmer Population and Housing Model 11 2.3 Assumptions 11 2.4 Demographic profile and implications for West of Braintree 13 2.5 Demographic profile and implications for Colchester Braintree Borders19 2.6 Demographic profile and implications for Tendring Colchester Borders26 3 Approach to analysing future employment 32 3.1 A framework for considering future employment growth 32 3.2 Introducing the employment scenarios 39 4 Employment scenarios 41
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Transport System for the South of Cambridge: Community Consultation Prepared for Smithsonhill May 2016 Draft
    An Integrated Transport System for the South of Cambridge: Community Consultation Prepared for SmithsonHill May 2016 Draft Final comments due: 10.06.2016 Alan Baxter Prepared by Isobel Knapp Reviewed by Trenton Williams Issued 20.05.2016 (v2 Draft) 10.05.2016 (v1 Draft) T:\1736\1736‐001\10 Reports\2016‐04 Workshop\07 Report\2016‐05‐20 Community Consultation Report (v2 Draft).docx This document is for the sole use of the person or organisation for whom it has been prepared under the terms of an invitation or appointment by such person or organisation. Unless and to the extent allowed for under the terms of such invitation or appointment this document should not be copied or used or relied upon in whole or in part by third parties for any purpose whatsoever. If this document has been issued as a report under the terms of an appointment by such person or organisation, it is valid only at the time of its production. Alan Baxter Ltd does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from unauthorised use of this report. If this document has been issued as a ‘draft’, it is issued solely for the purpose of client and/or team comment and must not be used for any other purpose without the written permission of Alan Baxter Ltd. Alan Baxter Ltd is a limited company registered in England and Wales, number 06600598. Registered office: 75 Cowcross Street, London, EC1M 6EL. © Copyright subsists in this document. Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2.0 A1307 Corridor Study ...................................................................................... 3 3.0 Community Consultation Workshop ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury
    Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury Final Report July 2016 Alison Farmer Associates 29 Montague Road Cambridge CB4 1BU 01223 461444 [email protected] In association with Julie Martin Associates and Countryscape 2 Contents 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Appointment............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background and Scope of Work.............................................................................. 3 1.3 Natural England Guidance on Assessing Landscapes for Designation ................... 5 1.4 Methodology and Approach to the Review .............................................................. 6 1.5 Format of Report ..................................................................................................... 7 2: The Evaluation Area ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Landscape Character Assessments as a Framework ............................................. 8 2.2 Defining and Reviewing the Evaluation Area Extent ................................................ 9 3: Designation History ..................................................................................................... 10 3.1 References to the Wider Stour Valley in the Designation of the AONB ................. 10 3.2 Countryside Commission Designation
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 655 6 March 2019 No. 264 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 6 March 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 939 6 MARCH 2019 940 Nigel Dodds (Belfast North) (DUP): The Secretary of House of Commons State knows, and the whole House knows, that there was violence on the part of dissident republicans even when we had devolution. However, given yesterday’s Wednesday 6 March 2019 improvised explosive devices and the link to dissident republicans, can she tell the House whether there is any The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock prospect of the security threat level being raised, and does she have any more information about the origins PRAYERS of those devices? Karen Bradley: The threat level in Northern Ireland—the [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] level of threat from Northern Ireland-related terrorism—is “severe”, and there is currently no suggestion that it will change. I had a conversation with the Chief Constable Oral Answers to Questions this morning. In respect of the specific incident to which the right hon. Gentleman has referred, these are the early days of an ongoing investigation, and it would NORTHERN IRELAND not be appropriate for me to say anything further at this stage. The Secretary of State was asked— Nigel Dodds: I thank the Secretary of State for that Devolved Government information, but she will understand the concern that is out there about those devices being sent through the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Fire & Rescue Service
    Essex County Fire & Rescue Service Our Values: Respect, Accountability, Openness and Involvement Strategic Risk Assessment of the Medium to Longer-Term Service Operating Environment 2009 – 2010 2 Countywide Review 2009 Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................................................................................4 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................5 3. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................6 4. Climate Change in East of England ................................................................................10 5. Demographics of Essex ......................................................................................................22 6. Diversity .......................................................................................................................................26 7. Older People in Essex ...........................................................................................................32 8. County Development and Transport Infrastructure ...............................................40 9. The Changing Face of Technology ................................................................................57 10. Terrorism .....................................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]