DOCSLIB.ORG

Navigating Socialist Encounters Africa in Global History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Navigating Socialist Encounters Africa in Global History Edited by Joël Glasman, Omar Gueye, Alexander Keese and Christine Whyte Advisory Board: Joe Alie, Felicitas Becker, William Gervase Clarence-Smith, Lynda Day, Scholastique Diazinga, Andreas Eckert, Babacar Fall, Toyin Falola, Matt Graham, Emma Hunter, Erin Jessee, Isabella Kentridge, Colleen Kriger, Kristin Mann, Patrick Manning, Conceição Neto, Vanessa S. Oliveira, Lorelle Semley, Ibrahim Sundiata Volume 2 Navigating Socialist Encounters Moorings and (Dis)Entanglements between Africa and East Germany during the Cold War Edited by Eric Burton, Anne Dietrich, Immanuel R. Harisch, and Marcia C. Schenck Gedruckt mit der freundlichen Unterstützung der Potsdam Graduate School, der Zentralen Forschungsförderung der Universität Potsdam, ,UP - Innovative Ideen fördern‘ und der Philosophisch-Historischen Fakultät der Universität Innsbruck. ISBN: 978-3-11-062231-7 eBook ISBN (PDF): 978-3-11-062354-3 eBook ISBN (EPUB): 978-3-11-062382-6 ISSN 2628-1767 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020952193 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Eric Burton et al., Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: An East German diplomat welcomes three Tanzanian journalists at Dar es Salaam airport on their return from a seminar in Berlin, ca. 1974 (courtesy of Norbert Böhme). Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Marcia C. Schenck, Immanuel R. Harisch, Anne Dietrich, and Eric Burton 1Introduction: Moorings and(Dis)Entanglements between Africa and East Germany during the Cold War 1 IShaping Pioneering Institutions Jörg Depta and Anne-Kristin Hartmetz 2Herder vs. Goethe in Egypt: East and West German Language Courses in Cairo and the Evolution of “German as aForeign Language” (DaF) 61 Christian Alvarado 3 “In the Spirit of Harambee!” Kenyan Student Unions in the German Democratic Republic andYugoslavia, 1964 –68 87 Eric Angermann 4Agency and Its Limits:African Unionists as Africa’s “Vanguard” at the FDGB CollegeinBernau 115 Franziska Rantzsch 5The Negotiations of the Contract Labor Accord between the GDR and Mozambique 139 II Navigating the GDR: Moorings and (Dis)Entanglements G. ThomasBurgess 6The Rise and FallofaSocialist Future: Ambivalent Encounters Between Zanzibar and East Germany in the Cold War 169 J. A. Osei, with an annotation by Immanuel R. Harisch 7MyImpression of the German Democratic Republic [Life Itself Exposes Lies] 193 VI TableofContents Fernando Agostinho Machava 8Echoes of the Past: The Social Impact of the Returned Labor Migrants from East Germany on the City of Maputo 207 Marcia C. Schenck and FranciscaRaposo 9Socialist Encounters at the SchoolofFriendship 235 Ibraimo Alberto and Marcia C. Schenck 10 PathsAre Made by Walking: Memories of Being aMozambican Contract Worker in the GDR 247 III Sourcing Visions of Solidarity GeorgeBodie 11 So Close, YetSoFar: Ulrich Makosch and the GDR’sAfrikabild on Screen and in Text 265 Paul Sprute 12 Diaries of Solidarity in the Global Cold War: The East German FriendshipBrigades and their Experience in ‘Modernizing’ Angola 293 Katrin Bahr 13 Between StateMission and Everyday Life: Private Photographs of East Germans in Mozambique in the 1980s 319 AlexandraPiepiorka and Eduardo F. Buanaissa 14 A(Post)Socialist MemorySpace? East German and Mozambican Memories of Cooperation in Education 351 List of Contributors 387 Index 393 MarciaC.Schenck, Immanuel R. Harisch, Anne Dietrich, and Eric Burton¹ 1Introduction: Moorings and (Dis)Entanglements between Africaand East Germany during the Cold War The Arusha Declaration of February 5, 1967confirmed the intention of Tanzania’s ruling party TANU (Tanganyika African National Union) to “build asocialist state.”² The declaration affirmedthat TANU plannedtopursue apolicy of nation- alization of major industries,banks, and insurance companies.³ Twomonths after the declaration, the Tanzaniantrade unionistSalvatory Kaindoah wrote an enthusiastic letter to share the news of developments in his country with the Fritz Heckert Trade Union College, in the East German town of Bernau whereKaindoah had studied: Dear Director of the College, Dr.Kampfert, Iamvery glad when Iamwritingthis lettertoyou now,beinginacountry which is in away liquidatingthe exploitation of man by man and on the waytoSocialism. Well done with your dailywork. How glad wereyou, when youheard that our country nationalizedall the banks and other big industries?⁴ Kaindoah, at thattime employed at the TanzanianNational Institute for Produc- tivity in Dar es Salaam, seemed to suggest thatthe Arusha Declaration meant the This introduction is the result of acollective thinkingand writingprocess of all four editors. Giventhe ongoingbenchmarkization of current academia,itisofincreasingimportance which author’sname comes first.Inorder to mitigate the effects of this development,wehavedecided to use an alphabetical order for the edited volume and an alphabeticallyreversed order for the introduction. The introduction also owes much to the valuable comments,corrections, and ad- vice of anumber of people. We want to thank the twoanonymous reviewers, Nele Fabian, Inge- borgGrau, and Arno Sondereggerfor their careful reading and helpful suggestions.Wealso want to thank the members of the GDR working groupatLeipzig University and Innocent Rwehabura for their comments. Last but not least we aregrateful to Pieter Cordwell for skillfullyeditingthe text and to MalteKöppen for streamliningthe footnotes, cleaningupthe bibliography,and cre- atingthe index. Tanganyika African NationalUnion, “Arusha Declaration,” February 5, 1967, accessed Janu- ary 29,2020, www.marxists.org/subject/africa/nyerere/1967/arusha-declaration.htm. Andrew Coulson, Tanzania: APoliticalEconomy (Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2013). Salvatory Kaindoah to Karl Kampfert,Dar es Salaam, April 10,1967, StiftungArchivder Par- teien und Massenorganisationen der DDR im Bundesarchiv, Berlin (henceforth: SAPMO BArch), DY 79/619. OpenAccess. ©2021 Marcia C. Schenck, Immanuel R. Harisch, Anne Dietrich, and Eric Burton, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110623543-001 2 Marcia C. Schenck, Immanuel R. Harisch, Anne Dietrich, and Eric Burton convergence of the United Republic of Tanzania with the German Democratic Re- public (GDR) in acohesive and growingworld of socialism. This was to be Social- ism with acapital “S,” perhaps optimisticallyindicating that the policies of TANU and the policiesofthe GDR’sruling Socialist Unity Party (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands,SED)led to ashared socialist future. Kaindoah’scel- ebratory letter is one of amyriad of examples of dialogue and entanglements be- tween African proponents of socialism, with their multiple visions of African and global futures,and East German individuals and institutions. ManyEast Germans, however,wereless confident about the viability of Tan- zania’spolicies and converging paths – includingthosewho observed these events from East Africa. Someweeks before Kaindoah’sletter was written, East Germanexpertsand diplomats gathered at ameeting of the local party branch of the SED in Stone Town,the capital of Tanzania’sisland region of Zan- zibar (it had been aseparate country until it mergedwith Tanganyikain1964 to createTanzania). Their discussions revealed the urge to classifyand evaluate the ArushaDeclaration basedonhow it conformed to Marxist-Leninist dogma. Ac- cording to the minutes of the party meeting,several comrades “immediatelyla- beled the program as unscientific” and dismissed its usefulnesstobuilding so- cialism in Tanzania. Other members questioned the suitability of asocialist program to Tanzania.They sawTanzania as being completelydifferent in mate- rial and culturalterms comparedtoEuropean circumstances, and at least one developmental stageawayfrom being a “Workers’ and Peasants’ State,” like the GDR.One memberasserted thatthe Arusha Declaration was “based on the level of development and the mentality of Africans. Can Africans even build so- cialism with their ideology?” He further alluded to the fact thatthe East Germans had not seen the declaration coming, despite their supposedlyleadingrole in guiding Tanzania to socialism: “Whywerewesurprised by the declaration?”⁵ The surprise felt by the East Germans in Zanzibar stemmed from the fact that manyofthem took for granted the leading roles of the Soviet Union and the GDR on the road to socialist development.Thus, manyfound it difficult to come to terms with Tanzanianactors who wereconceptualizing their own road to socialist development. In both Tanzania and the GDR,socialism would remain official government policy for the next two decades and beyond. By 1967, bothsocialisms had al- Contribution by Comrade O.,noplace[Zanzibar], no date[March 9, 1967], SAPMO-BArch, DY 30/98149.For adiscussionofthe roleofEast German advisers in Zanzibar,see Eric Burton, “Di- vergingVisions in Revolutionary Spaces:East German Advisers and Revolution from Abovein Zanzibar,1964–1970,” in Between East and South: Spaces of Interaction in the Globalizing Econ- omyofthe Cold War,ed. Anna Calori
Recommended publications
  • Revolution and Democracy: Sociopolitical Systems in the Context of Modernisation Leonid E

    Revolution and Democracy: Sociopolitical Systems in the Context of Modernisation Leonid E

    preview version Revolution and Democracy: Sociopolitical Systems in the Context of Modernisation Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev Abstract The stability of socio-political systems and the risks of destabi- lisation in the process of political transformation are among the most im- portant issues of social development; the transition to democracy may pose a serious threat to the stability of a respective socio-political system. This article studies the issue of democratisation. It highlights the high economic and social costs of a rapid transition to democracy for countries unpre- pared for it—democracy resulting from revolutions or similar large-scale events. The authors believe that in a number of cases authoritarian regimes turn out to be more effective in economic and social terms than emerging democracies, especially those of a revolutionary type, which are often inca- pable of ensuring social order and may have a swing to authoritarianism. Effective authoritarian regimes can also be a suitable form of transition to an efficient and stable democracy. Using historical and contemporary examples, particularly the recent events in Egypt, the article investigates various correlations between revolutionary events and the possibility of es- tablishing democracy in a society. Keywords: democracy, revolution, extremists, counterrevolution, Isla- mists, authoritarianism, military takeover, economic efficiency, globali- sation, Egypt Introduction It is not surprising that in five years none of the revolutions of the Arab Spring has solved any urgent issues. Unfortunately, this was probably never a possibility. Various studies suggest a link between 110 preview version revolutions and the degree of modernisation of a society.1 Our research reveals that the very processes of modernisation, regardless of the level of consumption and the rate of population growth, is closely and organically linked to the risk of social and political upheaval, which can Leonid E.
  • Asylum-Seekers Become the Nation's Scapegoat

    Asylum-Seekers Become the Nation's Scapegoat

    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 14 Number 2 Volume 14, Numbers 2 & 3, 1993 Article 7 1993 TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT Patricia A. Mollica Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mollica, Patricia A. (1993) "TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 14 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol14/iss2/ 7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. TURMOIL IN UNIFIED GERMANY: ASYLUM-SEEKERS BECOME THE NATION'S SCAPEGOAT I. INTRODUCTION On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall fell, symbolizing the end of a divided German state. The long dreamed-of unification finally came to its fruition. However, the euphoria experienced in 1989 proved ephemeral. In the past four years, Germans have faced the bitter ramifications of unity. The affluent, capitalist West was called on to assimilate and re-educate the repressed communist East. Since unification, Easterners have been plagued by unemployment and a lack of security and identity, while Westerners have sacrificed the many luxuries to which they have grown accustomed. A more sinister consequence of unity, however, is the emergence of a violent right-wing nationalist movement. Asylum- seekers and foreigners have become the target of brutal attacks by extremists who advocate a homogenous Germany.
  • The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011

    The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011

    Special CWIHP Research Report The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 By Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011 Forty-four years after the Berlin Wall was built and 15 years after the East German archives were opened, reliable data on the number of people killed at the Wall were still lacking. Depending on the sources, purpose, and date of the studies, the figures varied between 78 (Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations in Salzgitter), 86 (Berlin Public Prosecution Service), 92 (Berlin Police President), 122 (Central Investigation Office for Government and Unification Criminality), and more than 200 deaths (Working Group 13 August). The names of many of the victims, their biographies and the circumstances in which they died were widely unknown.1 This special CWIHP report summarizes the findings of a research project by the Center for Research on Contemporary History Potsdam and the Berlin Wall Memorial Site and Documentation Center which sought to establish the number and identities of the individuals who died at the Berlin Wall between 1961 and 1989 and to document their lives and deaths through historical and biographical research.2 Definition In order to provide reliable figures, the project had to begin by developing clear criteria and a definition of what individuals are to be considered victims at the Berlin Wall. We regard the “provable causal and spatial connection of a death with an attempted escape or a direct or indirect cause or lack of action by the ‘border organs’ in the border territory” as the critical factor. In simpler terms: the criteria are either an attempted escape or a temporal and spatial link between the death and the border regime.
  • Democracy As an Effort Rayna Gavrilova, CEE Trust USAID/Bulgaria Closing Ceremony October 10, 2007, Sofia

    Democracy As an Effort Rayna Gavrilova, CEE Trust USAID/Bulgaria Closing Ceremony October 10, 2007, Sofia

    Democracy as an Effort Rayna Gavrilova, CEE Trust USAID/Bulgaria Closing Ceremony October 10, 2007, Sofia Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, When I was invited to say a few words at the official closing of the United States Agency for International Development in Bulgaria, the first title that came to my mind was “Democracy as an Effort.” When change began, democracy for us was mostly about revolution – from Portugal’s Carnation Revolution, to Czechoslovakia’s Velvet Revolution, to Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Eighteen years later, we already realize that democracy is most of all a constant effort made by citizens and institutions. The post- communist countries, including Bulgaria, were lucky not to have been left alone in this process. The international assistance for laying the foundations of liberal democracy and market economy came early and was timely. The United States was among the first countries to get involved. American public organizations such as USAID, non- governmental organizations and an impressive number of individuals made a long-lasting and systematic effort to elucidate and support this social order which, without doubt, remains the choice of the larger part of humanity. USAID left visible traces in Bulgarian social life. Today we hardly remember it, but through their programs a whole variety of previously unknown concepts, such as “rule of law,” “local government initiative,” “transparency”, and “entrepreneurship promotion” entered the Bulgarian vocabulary and practice, and are today the foundation of the state. Some of the terms which had no equivalent in the rigid vocabulary of socialism remain untranslated even today: probation, mediation, microcredit.
  • At the FDGB College in Bernau¹

    At the FDGB College in Bernau¹

    Eric Angermann 4Agency and Its Limits: African Unionists as Africa’s “Vanguard” at the FDGB CollegeinBernau¹ On January 30,1961, Werner Raase’sterm of office endedabruptly.Raasehad served as the first director of the Institut fürAusländerstudium (Institute for For- eign Students), the most recent institution added to the East German trade union college, the Hochschule der Deutschen Gewerkschaften “FritzHeckert” in Bernau near Berlin.Onlyone dayearlier,the responsible federal executive of the central trade union federation which ranthe college, the Freie Deutsche Gewerkschafts- bund (FDGB), had decided to dismiss four persons: Raaseand his deputy,a teacher and an interpreter.² The FDGBexecutive criticized not onlythe theoretical and didactic short- comings in the teachingofstate-socialist Marxism-Leninism,for which Raase was held responsible. The decision to dismiss him was also basedonaninter- vention by 17 African students, whose requestfor atalk led high-ranked mem- bers of the Abteilung Internationale Verbindungen (International Relations Department) of the federal executive to travel to Bernau.³ The accusations sub- sequentlycollected wereserious.Inaddition to the criticism of insufficient “po- litical leadership” of the institute’sdirectorate,⁴ the second major point of cri- tique were racist statements made by Raaseand other teachers.For example, This essayisbased on my MA thesis published in 2018, in which the third Afro-Asian course at the FDGB collegefrom1961to1963isanalyzedinapraxeological and microhistorical investiga- tion. With regardtoAfricanstudents,the analysis focuses not onlyontheir agency, but also on their social background and motivations for studyinginthe GDR as well as their actions.Pas- sagesofthe work arealso contained in this essay; see Eric Angermann, “‘Ihr gehört auch zur Avantgarde’:African trade unionists at the FDGB’sacademyFritz Heckert (1961–1963)” (Master’s thesis,Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2018).
  • The Role of Ideology in Revolutionary Terror: Comparisons of the French, Russian and Ethiopian Experiences

    The Role of Ideology in Revolutionary Terror: Comparisons of the French, Russian and Ethiopian Experiences

    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 The Role of Ideology in Revolutionary Terror: Comparisons of the French, Russian and Ethiopian Experiences Tsegaye Zeleke PhD candidate in History at University of South Africa Abstract: Events unfolded during the French Revolution immensely impacted on the ensuing political struggles across the globe. The Terror which took place in Russia and Ethiopia following the 1917 and 1974 Revolutions respectively were among the classic instances. This paper, therefore, attempts to encapsulate how ideology played a pivotal role in the ‘Revolutionary Terror’ orchestrated by the Jacobins in France, the Bolsheviks in Russia and by the Ethiopian Revolutionary forces. But one of the specific features of the Russian Revolution was the recurrent and extensive use of Terror. Yet among the waves of Terror unfolded in Russia, the first one (1918-21) is a classical revolutionary Terror akin to that of the Jacobins. Likewise the Terror that occurred in Ethiopia ostensibly from 1976 to 1978 under the leadership of Colonel Mengistu Haile Mariam is also akin to this wave of the Bolsheviks Terror. Hence, as indicated hereinabove, the paper compares the three revolutionary Terrors based on the roles of ideology as idiosyncrasy from which terror emanated. Keywords: Revolutionary Terror, Ideology, France, Russia, Ethiopia 1. Ideological Basis of the Terror It seems that the Jacobins of France were the first Revolutionaries who carried out Revolutionary Terror that Although ―the Terror‖ can be defined in many ways, here it had far reaching repercussions. Scholars do not agree on the refers above all to state policy during the period 1793– factors that precipitated the Jacobins Terror (1793-94).
  • Kwaheri Ukoloni, Kwaheri Uhuru! Harith Ghassany

    Kwaheri Ukoloni, Kwaheri Uhuru! Harith Ghassany

    Kwaheri Ukoloni, Kwaheri Uhuru! Harith Ghassany [email protected] SOMA HAPA KWANZA Usambazaji wa kitabu hichi kwa mfumo wa Free Electronic Downloading unafanyika chini ya mkataba wa Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 ambao uko chini ya Sharia za nchi ya Marekani. Kwa mujibu wa Mkataba na Sharia hii, mtu anayekichukuwa kitabu hichi kupitia mfumo huu ana uhuru pia wa kukigawa, kukirudufu na kukisambaza chini ya masharti yafuatayo: • Kulitaja jina la mwandishi wa kitabu kwa njia isiyohalalisha matumizi binafsi ya kitabu • Kutokitumia kwa makusudi ya kibiashara wakati kinauzwa katika mfumo wa kitabu • Kutokubadilisha, kugeuza, au kuongeza chochote kwenye kitabu hichi Kwa maelezo zaidi, tafadhali tembelea: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ Kitabu hichi kinatolewa bure katika mfumo huu ili msomaji anufaike na baadaye naye akipendekeze kwa mwenzake ili hatimaye ujumbe wa kusimamisha amani uliomo kitabuni uwafikie walio wengi. Hata hivyo, mwandishi wa kitabu hiki anafahamu kwamba raha hasa ya kitabu ni kuwamo mikononi mwa msomaji, maana kitabu ni miongoni mwa vitu adhimu na vikongwe kabisa katika urathi wa mwanaadamu. Kwa hivyo, licha ya kutolewa fursa hii ya mfumo wa kukisoma bure kitabu hichi kupitia kwenye mtandao, ni matarajio ya mwandishi kuwa wako watakaopendelea wawe nacho mikononi na kukisoma kwa nafasi zao. Kwa vile walengwa wa mfumo huu wa Free Electronic Downloading ni Wazanzibari na Watanganyika wa kawaida, basi ipo haja kwa wale wenye uwezo, wakiwa ndani ama nje ya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania, kutoa mchango wa kuvinunua vitabu ama kupitia mtandao wa kitabu, http://kwaherikwaheri.com, au moja kwa moja kutoka http://lulu.com na kuwafikishia walimu na wanafunzi walioko kwenye skuli na vyuo vya Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania.
  • "GERMANY for GERMANS" Page 1 of 23

    "GERMANY for GERMANS" Page 1 of 23

    "GERMANY FOR GERMANS" Page 1 of 23 Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map "GERMANY FOR GERMANS" XENOPHOBIA AND RACIST VIOLENCE IN GERMANY Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © April 1995 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-76078 ISBN 1-56432-149-5 Cover photo: Hooded neo-Nazis give the Hitler salute on August 26, 1992 in front of a burning Trabant car during heavy clashes between police and neo-Nazis in front of an asylum hostel in Rostock. Copyright © Reuters/Bettman. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch is a nongovernmental organization established in 1978 to monitor and promote the observance of internationally recognized human rights in Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East and among the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It is supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. Kenneth Roth is the executive director; Cynthia Brown is the program director; Holly J. Burkhalter is the advocacy director; Ann S. Johnson is the development director; Gara LaMarche is the associate director: Juan E. Méndez is general counsel; Susan Osnos is the communications director; and Derrick Wong is the finance and administration director. Robert L. Bernstein is the chair of the board and Adrian W. DeWind is vice chair. Its Helsinki division was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria.
  • Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, Kmcmurry13@Wou.Edu

    Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, [email protected]

    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2018 Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan McMurry Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Legal Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation McMurry, Keegan, "Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials" (2018). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 264. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/264 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Schießbefehl1 and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan J. McMurry History 499: Senior Seminar June 5, 2018 1 On February 5th, 1989, 20-year old Chris Gueffroy and his companion, Christian Gaudin, were running for their lives. Tired of the poor conditions in the German Democratic Republic and hoping to find better in West Germany, they intended to climb the Berlin Wall that separated East and West Berlin using a ladder. A newspaper account states that despite both verbal warnings and warning shots, both young men continued to try and climb the wall until the border guards opened fire directly at them. Mr. Gaudin survived the experience after being shot, however, Mr.
  • Dossier Geschichte Und Erinnerung

    Dossier Geschichte Und Erinnerung

    Dossier Geschichte und Erinnerung bpb.de Dossier: Geschichte und Erinnerung (Erstellt am 23.09.2021) 2 Einleitung Debatten wie beispielsweise um das Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas zeigen, wie gegenwärtig die Vergangenheit ist. Der Umgang mit der deutschen Geschichte wird auch in Zukunft Thema in Politik und Gesellschaft sein, wird Wissenschaft und Unterricht beschäftigen und auch in den Familien immer wieder diskutiert werden – denn Geschichte wird in jeder Generation neu erzählt. Und dies geschieht zunehmend auch als Medienereignis und lockt Millionen vor die Fernseher. Aber können Dokudramen und historische Spielfilme den Geschichtsunterricht ersetzen? Wie verändern die neuen Medien unser Bild von der Vergangenheit? Und wie vermittelt man Geschichte an die kommenden Generationen und an Jugendliche z.B mit polnischen oder türkischen Wurzeln? Das Dossier bietet einen Überblick über die Geschichte der Erinnerungskultur in beiden deutschen Staaten, blickt zurück auf vergangene Kontroversen und sucht nach Antworten, wie die Erinnerung in Zukunft aussehen könnte. Dabei geht es auch um die Frage, inwieweit nationale kollektive Erinnerungen von einem gemeinsamen europäischen oder transnationalen Gedächtnis abgelöst werden können. bpb.de Dossier: Geschichte und Erinnerung (Erstellt am 23.09.2021) 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 5 1.1 Gedächtnis-Formen 6 1.2 Politik mit Geschichte – Geschichtspolitik? 9 1.3 Geschichtsmythen und Nationenbildung 14 1.4 Mythen der Neutralität 18 1.5 Kollektives Gedächtnis 26 1.6
  • Gründung Der "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Der Industriellen Und Gewerblichen Arbeitgeber Und Arbeitnehmer Deutschlands" [&Quo

    Gründung Der "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Der Industriellen Und Gewerblichen Arbeitgeber Und Arbeitnehmer Deutschlands" [&Quo

    Gründung der "Arbeitsgemeinschaft der industriellen und gewerblichen Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer Deutschlands" ["Zentralarbeitsgemeinschaft"], 15. November 1918 Zusammenfassung Das Abkommen über die Gründung einer "Arbeitsgemeinschaft der industriellen und gewerblichen Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer Deutschlands", das unter dem Namen "Zentralarbeitsgemeinschaft" (ZAG) oder "Stinnes-Legien-Abkommen" bekannter ist, wurde bei seiner Unterzeichnung am 15. November 1918 als "Magna Charta der deutschen Arbeiter" gefeiert. Bis heute gilt es als Wendepunkt hin zur Kooperation in den Arbeitsbeziehungen. Es wird als direkter Vorläufer der Sozialpartnerschaft gesehen, in dem die Tradition einer korporativen Marktwirtschaft in Deutschland wurzelt. Insofern ist das Abkommen über die Gründung der Zentralarbeitsgemeinschaft gewissermaßen der Ursprung des "Modell Deutschland". Einleitung Die "Arbeitsgemeinschaft der industriellen und gewerblichen Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer Deutschlands" war ein Kind des Ersten Weltkrieges. Im Verlauf des Krieges hatte der Staat, beraten durch die Verbände, zunehmend lenkend in die Wirtschaft eingegriffen. In den Augen der von einem hegelianischen Staatsverständnis geprägten Zeitgenossen hatte diese staatliche Wirtschaftslenkung, die sich auf die Beratung durch den Sachverstand der Verbände stützte, für eine bessere Güterdistribution gesorgt als die liberale Wirtschaftsordnung. Der Staats- bzw. Kriegssozialismus, meinten vielen Zeitgenossen, hatte mehr Gerechtigkeit in der Wirtschaft geschaffen. Denn der mit den Verbänden
  • Collapse of Memory

    Collapse of Memory

    – – COLLAPSE OF MEMORY – MEMORY OF COLLAPSE Narrating Past, Presence and Future about Periods of Crisis Alexander Drost Olga Sasunkevich Joachim Schiedermair COLLAPSE OF MEMORY OF COLLAPSE MEMORY Barbara Törnquist-Plewa (Eds.) Alexander Drost, Volha Olga Sasunkevich, Olga Sasunkevich, Alexander Drost, Volha Joachim Schiedermair, Barbara Törnquist-Plewa Joachim Schiedermair, Barbara Törnquist-Plewa Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Alexander Drost ∙ Olga Sasunkevich Joachim Schiedermair ∙ Barbara Törnquist-Plewa (Ed.) COLLAPSE OF MEMORY – MEMORY OF COLLAPSE NARRATING PAST, PRESENCE AND FUTURE ABOUT PERIODS OF CRISIS BÖHLAU VERLAG WIEN KÖLN WEIMAR Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC 4.0 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft aus Mitteln des Internationalen Graduiertenkollegs 1540 „Baltic Borderlands: Shifting Boundaries of Mind and Culture in the Borderlands of the Baltic Sea Region“ Published with assistance of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft by funding of the International Research Training Group “Baltic Borderlands: Shifting Boundaries of Mind and Culture in the Borderlands of the Baltic Sea Region” Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek : Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie ; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © 2019 by Böhlau Verlag GmbH & Cie, Lindenstraße 14, D-50674 Köln