Mineralogy, Petrology, and Genesis of the Lucifer Manganese Deposit, Santa Rosalia Area, Baja California Sur, Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mineralogy, Petrology, and Genesis of the Lucifer Manganese Deposit, Santa Rosalia Area, Baja California Sur, Mexico Mineralogy, petrology, and genesis of the Lucifer manganese deposit, Santa Rosalia area, Baja California Sur, Mexico Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Freiberg, Daniel Arthur Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 09:04:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/582324 MINERALOGY, PETROLOGY, AND GENESIS OF THE LUCIFER MANGANESE DEPOSIT, SANTA ROSALIA AREA, BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO by Daniel Arthur Freiberg A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In The Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1979 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: 7 / ? 7 ? WILBERT Dare Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My foremost acknowledgments and deepest gratitude go to my parents, Dr. and Mrs. Andrew Freiberg, for their unfailing support, both financial and moral, which made this thesis possible. - I would like to thank Dr. John Guilbert, my major advisor, for introducing me to the problems of the Boleo district and for his assis­ tance and helpful criticism. I am also grateful to Dr. Richard Beane and Dr. Arend Meijer for helpful suggestions and many useful consulta­ tions. It was upon the advice of Dr. Beane that my study of the Boleo district focused upon the Lucifer deposit. The Compahla Minera de Santa Rosalia was extremely helpful and cooperative during my visits to Santa Rosalia, providing me with, among other things, maps, an assistant, lodging and, more than once, help with my truck. I am especially grateful to Ing. Pedro Ortiz. Use of the scanning electron microprobe quantometer was made possible through the kindness of Dr. Michael Drake and the Department of Lunar and Planetary Sciences of The University of Arizona. Tom Teska provided much valuable assistance in its use. I owe special thanks to Hort Newsom for the many long and tedious hours spent showing me how to use the microprobe. Among the many students of the Department of Geosciences of The University of .Arizona who have helped me out during the course of this project, I would especially like to thank Fleet Koutz, Bob Brakenridge, iii iv Rick Gottschalk, and Greg McNew for valuable suggestions and for reading early drafts of the manuscript. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.......... vii LIST OF T A B L E S ............................................... x A B S T R A C T ................................. - ................ xi INTRODUCTION................................................. 1 Location, Production, and Access ......................... ' 2 Previous Studies .... ................................. 5 STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING AND PETROLOGY OF THE LUCIFER MINE REGION .................... 6 Quartz Monzonite (Cretaceous) ............................. 6 Comondd Volcanics (Middle(?) and Late Miocene) .......... 9 Boleo Formation (Early Pliocene) ......................... 19 Basal Congl o m e r a t e ................................... 20 Tuffaceous Limestone ................................. 21 Tuffs and Tuffaceous Conglomerate ..................... 23 Pliocene and Quaternary Sedimentary Units Overlying the Boleo Formation.......... 33 Tres Virgenes Volcanics (Pleistocene and Recent) ........ 34 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY ........................................... 37 General Structural Features of the Santa Rosalia (Boleo) Region ....................................... 37 Structural Features of the Lucifer M i n e .................. 38 MANGANESE D E P O S I T S ................ 46 General Features of the Lucifer Manganese Deposit ......... 46 Mineralogy of the Lucifer Deposit ......................... 56 General Considerations ............................... 56 Composition of the Cryptomelane M i n e r a l s ............ 68 Paragenetic Relationships in the Lucifer Manganese O r e ..................................... 75 ALTERATION IN THE LUCIFER A R E A ............................... 78 Alteration of Mafic Silicates ....... ........ ... 78 Alteration Associated with Manganese Mineralization .... 83 v vi TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page Whole-rock Compositional Analyses of Fresh and Altered R o c k s .................. 84 D I S C U S S I O N ....................................................... 94 ORIGIN OF THE LUCIFER DEPOSIT.................................... 102 Geologic Criteria ....................................... 102 Tectonic Setting and Related Processes of Ore D e p o s i t i o n ................................. 112 Geochemical Processes of Formation ..................... 118 RELATION OF THE LUCIFER DEPOSIT TO COPPER DEPOSITS AND OTHER MANGANESE MINERALIZATION IN AND NEAR THE SANTA ROSALIA (B0LE0) DISTRICT .............................. 134 APPENDIX I: GENERAL MICROPROBE INFORMATION .............. 142 APPENDIX II: MICROPROBE ANALYSES (WEIGHT PERCENT) OF LUCIFER ORE SAMPLES............................. 145 APPENDIX III: MOLECULAR PROPORTIONS OF CRYPTOMELANE "A"-SITE CATIONS AT 8 (Mn + Fe + Al) ........ 159 APPENDIX IV: " LOCATIONS OF SAMPLES DISCUSSED IN TEXT ..... 162 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................... 163 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Location Map of Area Studied........................... 3 2. Northern Portion of the Boleo District ................. 4 3. Correlation of Lucifer and Boleo Stratigraphic Sections ..... ............ 7 4. Geologic Map of the Lucifer Mine and Surrounding Area, Baja California, M e x i c o .............. .. ..In pocket 5. Geologic Cross Section of the Lucifer Area along Line A - A * ................................... 8 6. Boleo Basal Conglomerate Overlying Comondti Agglomerate ........ .............................. 11 7. Photomicrographs of Comondu Vitrophyric-textured Volcanic Rock (Sample LZ22) ........ ....... 14 8. Photomicrographs of Comondil Felsophyric-textured Volcanic Rock (Sample LX10) 17 9. Boleo Tuffaceous Limestone Overlying Basal Conglomerate...................... 22 10. Remnant of the Manganese Ore Manto Overlying Boleo T u f f s ....................................... 27 11. Photomicrographs of Boleo Tuff with Original, Non-intraformational Texture (Sample LP3A) .... 29 12. Photomicrograph of Boleo Tuff with Intraformational Texture (Sample LZ20B) ............................. 30 13. Quaternary Conglomerate Overlying Stratified Manganese O r e ..................................... 35 14. Exposure of Partly Buried Ridge of Comondu Volcanics . 39 15. Lucifer Mine, Looking West up Wash in the Northeast Part of the Study A r e a ............................. 40 vii viii 'LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 16. Dip-histogram Rosette for Bedded Comondu Volcanic U n i t s ............ 42 17. Strike-histogram Rosettes for Fractures in the Lucifer A r e a ............................ 44 18. Lucifer Ore Sample with Distinctive Clastic A p p e a r a n c e .................................... 49 19. Detail Map of the Exposure of the Ridge of Comondu Volcanics near the Southern End of the Orebody .. 51 20. Contact of Mineralized Boleo Basal Conglomerate and ComondtS Breccia at the Exposure of the Comondu R i d g e ........................ 53 21. Mineralized Comondd Bedded Volcanics Grading into Breccia........................................ 54 22. Manganiferous Laharic Breccia ............ 54 23. Boleo Tuffaceous Conglomerate Overlying Manganese Ore . 55 24. Stratified Manganese Ore Overlying Altered Boleo Basal Conglomerate ............................. 57 25. Photomicrograph of Lucifer Ore Polished Section Illustrating the Growth of Pyrolusite Around Cryptomelane ....................................... 61 26. Photomicrograph of High-K Cryptomelane Surrounding Early C o r o n a d i t e .............................. 63 27. Photomicrograph of Botryoidal Colloform Cryptomelane . 65 28. Photomicrograph of Pisolitic Cryptomelane Broken by Siliceous Gangue ................................... 65 29. X-ray Backscatter Scanning Images of Lucifer Manganese O r e .................................. 66 30. Plot of Univalent vs. Divalent Cations in Lucifer Cryptomelane "A" Sites 71 lx LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Figure Page 31. Pb-K-Ba Ternary Diagram ................................. 72 32. Na-K-Ca Ternary Diagram ................................. 74 33. Paragenetic Sequence of Mineral Formation in Lucifer O r e ........................ 76 34. Photomicrograph of a Sample of the Unaltered Core of a Boulder of Comondu Volcanics in Mineralized Boleo
Recommended publications
  • The Behavior of Molybdenum., Tungsten, and Titanium
    The behavior of molybdenum, tungsten, and titanium in the porphyry copper environment Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kuck, Peter Hinckley Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 08/10/2021 00:24:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565421 THE BEHAVIOR OF MOLYBDENUM., TUNGSTEN, AND TITANIUM IN THE PORPHYRY COPPER ENVIRONMENT Peter' 'Hinckley Kuck A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES. In Partial.Fulfillment of the Requirements. ' ■ For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College ■ THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 8 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my Peter Hinckley Kuck direction by ___________ , , The Behavior of Molybdenum, Tungsten, and Titanium entitled ________________________________________________________ in the Porphyry Copper Environment be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Doctor of Philosophy degree of _______________________________________________________ Dissertation Director Date As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read this dissertation and agree that it may be presented for final defense. \ R A j r i A hi / 7IT 2 / 1 r 7 - Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense thereof at the final oral examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphism of Sedimentary Manganese Deposits
    Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, Szeged, XX/2, 325—336, 1972. METAMORPHISM OF SEDIMENTARY MANGANESE DEPOSITS SUPRIYA ROY ABSTRACT: Metamorphosed sedimentary deposits of manganese occur extensively in India, Brazil, U. S. A., Australia, New Zealand, U. S. S. R., West and South West Africa, Madagascar and Japan. Different mineral-assemblages have been recorded from these deposits which may be classi- fied into oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations. The oxide formations are represented by lower oxides (braunite, bixbyite, hollandite, hausmannite, jacobsite, vredenburgite •etc.), the carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, kutnahorite, manganoan calcite etc., the silicate formations by spessartite, rhodonite, manganiferous amphiboles and pyroxenes, manganophyllite, piedmontite etc. and the silicate-carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, rhodonite, tephroite, spessartite etc. Pétrographie and phase-equilibia data indicate that the original bulk composition in the sediments, the reactions during metamorphism (contact and regional and the variations and effect of 02, C02, etc. with rise of temperature, control the mineralogy of the metamorphosed manga- nese formations. The general trend of formation and transformation of mineral phases in oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations during regional and contact metamorphism has, thus, been established. Sedimentary manganese formations, later modified by regional or contact metamorphism, have been reported from different parts of the world. The most important among such deposits occur in India, Brazil, U.S.A., U.S.S.R., Ghana, South and South West Africa, Madagascar, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, Japan etc. An attempt will be made to summarize the pertinent data on these metamorphosed sedimentary formations so as to establish the role of original bulk composition of the sediments, transformation and reaction of phases at ele- vated temperature and varying oxygen and carbon dioxide fugacities in determin- ing the mineral assemblages in these deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Historical Earth Pigments Used in India's Wall Paintings
    heritage Review A Review on Historical Earth Pigments Used in India’s Wall Paintings Anjali Sharma 1 and Manager Rajdeo Singh 2,* 1 Department of Conservation, National Museum Institute, Janpath, New Delhi 110011, India; [email protected] 2 National Research Laboratory for the Conservation of Cultural Property, Aliganj, Lucknow 226024, India * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Iron-containing earth minerals of various hues were the earliest pigments of the prehistoric artists who dwelled in caves. Being a prominent part of human expression through art, nature- derived pigments have been used in continuum through ages until now. Studies reveal that the primitive artist stored or used his pigments as color cakes made out of skin or reeds. Although records to help understand the technical details of Indian painting in the early periodare scanty, there is a certain amount of material from which some idea may be gained regarding the methods used by the artists to obtain their results. Considering Indian wall paintings, the most widely used earth pigments include red, yellow, and green ochres, making it fairly easy for the modern era scientific conservators and researchers to study them. The present knowledge on material sources given in the literature is limited and deficient as of now, hence the present work attempts to elucidate the range of earth pigments encountered in Indian wall paintings and the scientific studies and characterization by analytical techniques that form the knowledge background on the topic. Studies leadingto well-founded knowledge on pigments can contribute towards the safeguarding of Indian cultural heritage as well as spread awareness among conservators, restorers, and scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Manganoquadratite, Agmnass3, a New Manganese Bearing
    American Mineralogist, Volume 97, pages 1199–1205, 2012 Manganoquadratite, AgMnAsS3, a new manganese-bearing sulfosalt from the Uchucchacua polymetallic deposit, Lima Department, Peru: Description and crystal structure PAOLA BONAZZI,1,* FRANK N. KEUTSCH,2 AND LUCA BINDI1,3 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy 2Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A. 3Museo di Storia Naturale, sezione di Mineralogia e Litologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy ABSTRACT Manganoquadratite, ideally AgMnAsS3, is a new mineral from the Uchucchacua polymetallic deposit, Oyon district, Catajambo, Lima Department, Peru. It occurs as dark gray, anhedral to subhe- dral grains up 0.5 mm across, closely associated with alabandite, Mn-rich calcite, Mn-rich sphalerite, proustite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, tennantite, argentotennantite, stannite, and other unnamed minerals of the system Pb-Ag-Sb-Mn-As-S. Manganoquadratite is opaque with a metallic luster and possesses 2 a reddish-brown streak. It is brittle, the Vickers microhardness (VHN10) is 81 kg/mm (range 75–96) (corresponding Mohs hardness of 2–2½). The calculated density is 4.680 g/cm3 (on the basis of the empirical formula). In plane-polarized reflected light, manganoquadratite is moderately bireflectant and very weakly pleochroic from dark gray to a blue gray. Internal reflections are absent. Between crossed polars, the mineral is anisotropic, without characteristic rotation tints. Reflectance percentages (Rmin and Rmax) for the four standard COM wavelengths are 29.5, 31.8 (471.1 nm), 28.1, 30.5 (548.3 nm), 27.3, 29.3 (586.6 nm), and 26.0, 28.2 (652.3 nm), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Beneficiation of Iranian Low-Grade Manganese Ore
    Physicochemical Problems Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 49(2), 2013, 725−741 of Mineral Processing ISSN 1643-1049 (print) www.minproc.pwr.wroc.pl/journal/ ISSN 2084-4735 (online) Received July 24, 2012; reviewed; accepted April 26, 2013 CHARACTERIZATION AND BENEFICIATION OF IRANIAN LOW-GRADE MANGANESE ORE Akbar MEHDILO, Mehdi IRANNAJAD, Mohammad Reza HOJJATI-RAD * Department of Mining and Metallurgical Eng., Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran *[email protected] Abstract: The mineralogical studies indicated that the Charagah ore deposit contains approximately 17% pyrolusite, 78% calcite and 3–4% quartz. Pyrolusite as a main valuable mineral is found in the forms of coarse and fine pyrolusites. The coarse grains pyrolusite with simple texture is liberated at 180 micrometers. Another kind of pyrolusite with particle size finer than 10 m is disseminated inside gangue phases. This kind of pyrolusite has important effect in beneficiation processes and can affect the manganese grade of the concentrate and its recovery negatively. By jigging machine a pre-concentrate with 20% MnO and a final tailing with about 13% manganese loss are obtained. Using tabling technique or wet high intensity magnetic separation (WHIMS) and also their combination with jigging machine, production of a final pyrolusite concentrate with suitable grade but average recovery is possible. By jigging-tabling a concentrate with – 500+45 m size fraction, 44.3% MnO and 61.3% recovery is obtained while jigging-WHIMS produces a concentrate containing 52.6% MnO with a recovery up to 56.6% and d80 = 180 m. Keywords: pyrolusite, manganese ore, ore characterization, gravity separation, magnetic separation Introduction Manganese is used mainly in steel production, directly in pig iron manufacture and indirectly through upgrading ore to ferroalloys.
    [Show full text]
  • IMA Master List
    The New IMA List of Minerals – A Work in Progress – Update: February 2013 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of all valid mineral species is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association, which is the organization in charge for approval of new minerals, and more in general for all issues related to the status of mineral species. The list, which will be updated on a regular basis, is intended as the primary and official source on minerals. Explanation of column headings: Name: it is the presently accepted mineral name (and in the table, minerals are sorted by name). Chemical formula: it is the CNMNC-approved formula. IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). IMA No. / Year: for approved minerals the IMA No. is given: it has the form XXXX-YYY, where XXXX is the year and YYY a sequential number; for grandfathered minerals the year of the original description is given. In some cases, typically for Rd and Rn minerals, the year may be followed by s.p.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL OCCURRENCES OF THE GUIANA SHIELD, VENEZUELA by Gary B. Sidder1 Open-File Report 90-16 1990 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..........................^ 1 GOLD..............................._ 1 DIAMONDS...................................^ 5 IRON.................................................^ 6 ALUMINUM...............................^ 8 MANGA>ffiSE....................................................._ 10 TIN.......................................................................................................... 12 NIOBIUM, TANTALUM, RARE EARTH ELEMENTS................................ 13 URANIUM................................^ 14 MOLYBDENUM.................................................................................................... 15 TITANIUM........................................................................................... 16 PLATINUM.................................................................................................... 16 OTHERMETALS................................................................ 17 SUMMARY...........................^ 17 REFERENCES CITED............................................................................... 18 ILLUSTRATIONS Table 1. Principal mining districts, mines, and mineral occurrences in the Guiana Shield, Venezuela.................. 27 Plate 1. Mineral
    [Show full text]
  • By Michael Fleischer and Constance M. Schafer Open-File Report 81
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE FORD-FLEISCHER FILE OF MINERALOGICAL REFERENCES, 1978-1980 INCLUSIVE by Michael Fleischer and Constance M. Schafer Open-File Report 81-1174 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards 1981 The Ford-Fleischer File of Mineralogical References 1978-1980 Inclusive by Michael Fleischer and Constance M. Schafer In 1916, Prof. W.E. Ford of Yale University, having just published the third Appendix to Dana's System of Mineralogy, 6th Edition, began to plan for the 7th Edition. He decided to create a file, with a separate folder for each mineral (or for each mineral group) into which he would place a citation to any paper that seemed to contain data that should be considered in the revision of the 6th Edition. He maintained the file in duplicate, with one copy going to Harvard University, when it was agreed in the early 1930's that Palache, Berman, and Fronde! there would have the main burden of the revision. A number of assistants were hired for the project, including C.W. Wolfe and M.A. Peacock to gather crystallographic data at Harvard, and Michael Fleischer to collect and evaluate chemical data at Yale. After Prof. Ford's death in March 1939, the second set of his files came to the U.S. Geological Survey and the literature has been covered since then by Michael Fleischer. Copies are now at the U.S. Geological Survey at Reston, Va., Denver, Colo., and Menlo Park, Cal., and at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List
    LIST L - MINERALS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Specific mineral Group name Specific mineral Group name acanthite sulfides asbolite oxides accessory minerals astrophyllite chain silicates actinolite clinoamphibole atacamite chlorides adamite arsenates augite clinopyroxene adularia alkali feldspar austinite arsenates aegirine clinopyroxene autunite phosphates aegirine-augite clinopyroxene awaruite alloys aenigmatite aenigmatite group axinite group sorosilicates aeschynite niobates azurite carbonates agate silica minerals babingtonite rhodonite group aikinite sulfides baddeleyite oxides akaganeite oxides barbosalite phosphates akermanite melilite group barite sulfates alabandite sulfides barium feldspar feldspar group alabaster barium silicates silicates albite plagioclase barylite sorosilicates alexandrite oxides bassanite sulfates allanite epidote group bastnaesite carbonates and fluorides alloclasite sulfides bavenite chain silicates allophane clay minerals bayerite oxides almandine garnet group beidellite clay minerals alpha quartz silica minerals beraunite phosphates alstonite carbonates berndtite sulfides altaite tellurides berryite sulfosalts alum sulfates berthierine serpentine group aluminum hydroxides oxides bertrandite sorosilicates aluminum oxides oxides beryl ring silicates alumohydrocalcite carbonates betafite niobates and tantalates alunite sulfates betekhtinite sulfides amazonite alkali feldspar beudantite arsenates and sulfates amber organic minerals bideauxite chlorides and fluorides amblygonite phosphates biotite mica group amethyst
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Gravity Index for Minerats
    A SPECIFICGRAVITY INDEX FOR MINERATS c. A. MURSKyI ern R. M. THOMPSON, Un'fuersityof Bri.ti,sh Col,umb,in,Voncouver, Canad,a This work was undertaken in order to provide a practical, and as far as possible,a complete list of specific gravities of minerals. An accurate speciflc cravity determination can usually be made quickly and this information when combined with other physical properties commonly leads to rapid mineral identification. Early complete but now outdated specific gravity lists are those of Miers given in his mineralogy textbook (1902),and Spencer(M,i,n. Mag.,2!, pp. 382-865,I}ZZ). A more recent list by Hurlbut (Dana's Manuatr of M,i,neral,ogy,LgE2) is incomplete and others are limited to rock forming minerals,Trdger (Tabel,l,enntr-optischen Best'i,mmungd,er geste,i,nsb.ildend,en M,ineral,e, 1952) and Morey (Encycto- ped,iaof Cherni,cal,Technol,ogy, Vol. 12, 19b4). In his mineral identification tables, smith (rd,entifi,cati,onand. qual,itatioe cherai,cal,anal,ys'i,s of mineral,s,second edition, New york, 19bB) groups minerals on the basis of specificgravity but in each of the twelve groups the minerals are listed in order of decreasinghardness. The present work should not be regarded as an index of all known minerals as the specificgravities of many minerals are unknown or known only approximately and are omitted from the current list. The list, in order of increasing specific gravity, includes all minerals without regard to other physical properties or to chemical composition. The designation I or II after the name indicates that the mineral falls in the classesof minerals describedin Dana Systemof M'ineralogyEdition 7, volume I (Native elements, sulphides, oxides, etc.) or II (Halides, carbonates, etc.) (L944 and 1951).
    [Show full text]