Rs of Marcus a E Us

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rs of Marcus a E Us The reluctant warlord Historical introduction rs of Marcus A e u s With Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Empire was for the fi rst time ruled by two emperors, both adoptive sons of the late Emperor Antoninus Pius (r. AD 138–161). Marcus had selected his nine-year-younger adoptive brother Lucius Verus to be his co-emperor. The two in- dividuals could not have been more different in character. While the ascetic Marcus, whose main interest was philosophy, had been taught to “avoid the ways of the rich” (Meditations 1.3.), critics declaimed against Lucius’ luxurious lifestyle and his habits. By Robert Heiligers state Armenia in the autumn of AD 161. The two imperial brothers acted in unison and the Senate arcus was born on 26 April 121. thought it advantageous that one could stay at After his father died in 129, he home and take care of the public administration was adopted by his paternal while the other one dealt with critical situations grandfather, Marcus Annius at the front. Upon becoming emperor, Marcus MVerus. At the age of eighteen, Marcus served as took the name Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Au- consul under Emperor Antoninus Pius. He mar- gustus. ried Antoninus’ daughter Faustina and would No soldier by upbringing, experience, or na- have at least twelve children with her. The only ture, Marcus nevertheless spent more time away son to survive childhood was Commodus, who on campaign than any of his predecessors. The would later succeed Marcus. In 140, Marcus reign of Marcus Aurelius marked the end of a was made consul again, with Emperor Antoni- long period of relative peace in the second cen- nus Pius as his colleague. As the heir apparent, tury AD. The Emperor faced fi nancial problems Marcus became princeps iuventutis, head of the caused by frontier wars in Parthia in the east. In equestrian order. He now took the name Marcus the west, invading Germanic tribes along the Aelius Aurelius Verus Caesar and as such offi - borders made incursions across the Rhine and cially became the designated next emperor. across the Danube. He also had to deal with a This large equestrian statue of fl ood that engulfed Rome, causing a severe fam- Marcus Aurelius. This bronze The reign of Marcus Aurelius ine. To make matters even worse, a virulent dis- statue was originally gilded; When Emperor Antoninus Pius died in 161 AD, ease – probably an extremely contagious kind some fragments of gold leaf are Marcus had spent 23 years learning the ropes of smallpox – was brought back from the east still attached to the surface. His of the administrative structures within the Ro- after the Roman interventions in Parthia. This re- extended hand suggests that he is man Empire. The Senate had planned to confi rm sulted in signifi cant loss of life as well as enor- about to address a crowd. The re- Marcus alone as Pius’ successor, but he had re- mous losses in tax income. The disease reached naissance sculptor Michelangelo fused to take offi ce unless his adoptive brother Rome in 166 and would eventually kill off an moved it to the Campidoglio at Lucius Verus received the same status and pow- estimated fi fteen to twenty million people (25 to Rome. It is currently on display ers as himself. Even though the concept of dual 30 percent of the empire’s population). Due to inside the Conservatory Museum emperorship was a novelty, the Senate actually sheer lack of manpower, Marcus had the deplet- to protect it from the elements. welcomed the situation. Rome’s archenemies, ed ranks of the army supplemented with slaves, © Karwansaray Publishers the Parthians, had just invaded the Roman vassal bandits, gladiators, and barbarians. 6 Ancient Warfare VII-6 AW VII.6 jan14b.indd 6 05-01-14 19:06 The reluctant warlord The Parthians Obii, Marcomanni, and Quadi invaded Pan- In autumn of 161, the Parthians invaded Arme- nonia. Local forces defeated the invaders with nia and Syria, subsequently beating the armies relative ease. But two years later, a large force of the Armenian governor Severianus and of the of Marcomanni and Quadi achieved a smashing governor of Syria, Attidius Cornelianus. Lucius victory against an army of 20,000 Romans near Verus left Rome in the summer of 162 and re- Carnutum (40km west of modern Vienna). While conquered Armenia in 163. He moved on to the larger part of their host moved southwards Mesopotamia, attacked Parthia and destroyed towards Italy, the remainder ravaged Noricum. the city of Seleucia in 165. Avidius Cassius burnt As the smallpox was ravaging the Empire, down the palace at the Parthian capital of Cte- the punitive expedition against the invading siphon, located directly across the Tigris. King tribes was postponed until AD 168. When the Vologaeses IV sued for peace and was forced Emperors established their headquarters at Aq- to cede northern Mesopotamia to the Romans, uileia, the Marcomanni withdrew. Heading who deployed units in the cities of Nisibis and back to Rome, Lucius Verus suffered a stroke Singara. Murray Dahm’s contribution discusses and died three days later at the age of 38. Mar- Lucius Verus’ campaigns in Parthia in detail. cus now returned to Rome alone to oversee his brother’s funeral. With the Emperors gone, the Invasions Marcomanni razed Opitergium (modern Oder- Portrait of Lucius Verus, who led When a great number of Roman troops were zo) and besieged Aquileia. By the end of 171, a campaign against the Parthians withdrawn from the Limes in 162 in order to the Romans forced them to sign a treaty promis- to reconquer Armenia in AD 163. deal with the Parthian invasion of Armenia, ing they would leave a 7km-wide security-zone Currently in the Antakya Archae- German tribes could now more easily cross the along the river unsettled. For details, refer to Sid- ological Museum. Roman border. In late 165, 6,000 Langobardi, ney Dean’s contribution to this issue. © Livius.Org © Michael Schmeling Ancient Warfare VII-6 7 AW VII.6 jan14b.indd 7 05-01-14 19:06 The reluctant warlord In the meantime, the Vandals and the Sarma- Change of military tactics tian Iazyges had invaded Dacia, while, farther to To engage invading tribes simultaneously at the east, the Sarmatian Costoboci had crossed different points on the border, smaller detach- the Danube, ravaging Thrace and Macedonia. ments (vexillationes) were created to move to Only 20km from Athens, they plundered and critical areas. However, these fl ying squads did destroyed the temple of the Eleusinian Mysteries. not smoothly interact, which resulted in severe Then, in 173, Didius Julianus, the commander organizational problems. In the Late Roman Em- of the Rhine frontier, had to repel another inva- pire the answer to this dilemma was the creation sion of the Chatti and the Hermunduri, while the of the vexillationes comitatenses, reservists that Chauci raided the shoreline of Gallia Belgica. were stationed behind the front lines and who The Iazyges were defeated in several battles. could be deployed where needed. See also this Meanwhile, the Quadi revolted again. The war issue’s contribution by Simon MacDowall. moved west and, in AD 174, the Quadi had to The Marcomannic wars had exposed the confront the Romans in their homelands (mod- weakness of Rome’s northern frontier, and ern Slovakia). After their subjugation, garrisons henceforth, sixteen of the 33 Roman legions were installed throughout their territory and they would be stationed along the Danube and the An engraved gem depicting Mar- were forced to surrender hostages and provide Rhine. For the Germanic tribes, however, the cus Aurelius and his wife, Fausti- auxiliary contingents for the Roman army. It was Marcomannic wars were only the prelude of the na the Younger. Currently on dis- during these campaigns that Marcus Aurelius great invasions that would eventually disassem- play in the Baden-Württemberg started writing his philosophical work Medita- ble and end the Western Roman Empire in the State Museum of Archaeology in tions (see Eugenia Russell’s contribution). fourth and fi fth centuries. Stuttgart. In 175, Roman troops crossed the Danube On 17 March 180, the Emperor died, prob- © Livius.Org again to fi nally subjugate the Iazyges. Although ably at Vindobona (modern Vienna), either as a Marcus was ill (which would give rise to ru- result of the smallpox, or of cancer. His ashes mours that the emperor had died), he decided to were entombed in Hadrian’s Mausoleum – the join the campaign. The enemy suffered a severe present Castel Sant’Angelo in Rome – and in his defeat, surrendering 100,000 Roman captives honour, the Senate erected a column in the cur- and providing a contingent of 8,000 horsemen, rent Piazza Colonna; see Michael Taylor’s contri- of whom 500 were immediately dispatched to bution to this issue. 0 Britain. Traces of these forces have been found in the Roman cavalry fort at Chesters on Hadrian’s Robert Heiligers is an ardent amateur histori- Wall, amongst others. When, in 177, the Quadi an. He has been interested in ancient and early and Marcomanni rebelled, Marcus Aurelius medieval history for over forty years. He is a went to Carnuntum and moved against the Mar- regular contributor to Slingshot, the magazine comanni. In 179, a decisive battle took place of the Society of Ancients. against the Quadi near modern Trencín in Slova- kia. The Quadi were chased westwards, deeper into Greater Germania, where another decisive victory was achieved against them. Further reading The revolt of Avidius Cassius • Anthony R. Birley, Marcus Aurelius: A Bi- In 175, the false news of the death of the ailing ography (New York 2001).
Recommended publications
  • Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
    2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Germania TEG1 8/2/2004 2:52 PM Page 16 TEG1 8/2/2004 2:52 PM Page 17
    TEG1 8/2/2004 2:52 PM Page 15 Part I Germania TEG1 8/2/2004 2:52 PM Page 16 TEG1 8/2/2004 2:52 PM Page 17 1 Land and People The Land The heartland of the immense area of northern Europe occupied by the early Germanic peoples was the great expanse of lowland which extends from the Netherlands to western Russia. There are no heights here over 300 metres and most of the land rises no higher than 100 metres. But there is considerable variety in relief and soil conditions. Several areas, like the Lüneburg Heath and the hills of Schleswig-Holstein, are diverse in both relief and landscape. There was until recent times a good deal of marshy ground in the northern parts of the great plain, and a broad belt of coastal marshland girds it on its northern flank. Several major rivers drain the plain, the Ems, Weser and Elbe flowing into the North Sea, the Oder and the Vistula into the Baltic. Their broad valleys offered attrac- tive areas for early settlement, as well as corridors of communication from south to north. The surface deposits on the lowland largely result from successive periods of glaciation. A major influence on relief are the ground moraines, comprising a stiff boulder clay which produces gently undu- lating plains or a terrain of small, steep-sided hills and hollows, the latter often containing small lakes and marshes, as in the area around Berlin. Other features of the relief are the hills left behind by terminal glacial moraines, the sinuous lakes which are the remains of melt-water, and the embayments created by the sea intruding behind a moraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Cgpt1; MAGNA GERMANIA; CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY BOOK 2, CHAPTER 10; FACT OR FICTION
    cgPt1; MAGNA GERMANIA; CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY BOOK 2, CHAPTER 10; FACT OR FICTION SYNOPSIS The locations of some +8000 settlements and geographical features are included within the text of Claudius Ptolemy‟s „Geographia‟. To control the text and ensure readers understood the methodology there-in utilised it is evident that Claudius Ptolemy determined a strict order and utilisation of the information he wished to disseminate. That strict methodology is maintained through the first 9 chapters of Book 2, but the 10th chapter breaks all of the rules that had been established. Chapters 11 to 15 then return to the established pattern. Magna Germania was basically unknown territory and in such a situation Claudius Ptolemy was able to ignore any necessity to guess thus leaving an empty landscape as is evinced in Book 3, chapter 5, Sarmatian Europe. Why in an unknown land there are 94 settlements indicated in Germania when the 3 provinces of Gallia have only a total of 114 settlements, is a mystery? And, why does Claudius Ptolemy not attribute a single settlement to a tribal group? It appears there are other factors at play, which require to be investigated. BASIC PTOLEMY When analysing a map drawn from the data provided by Claudius Ptolemy it is first necessary to ensure that it is segregated into categories. Those are; 1) reliable information i.e. probably provided via the Roman Army Cosmographers and Geometres; 2) the former information confirmed or augmented by various itineraries or from Bematists; 3) the possibility of latitudinal measurements from various settlements (gnomon ratios); 4) basic travellers tales with confirmed distances „a pied‟; 5) basic sailing distances along coastlines and those which can be matched to land distances; 6) guesses made by travellers who did not actually record the days travelled but only the length of time for the overall journey; 7) obscure references from ancient texts which cannot be corroborated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullard Eva 2013 MA.Pdf
    Marcomannia in the making. by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Eva Bullard 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Marcomannia in the making by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member During the last stages of the Marcommani Wars in the late second century A.D., Roman literary sources recorded that the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was planning to annex the Germanic territory of the Marcomannic and Quadic tribes. This work will propose that Marcus Aurelius was going to create a province called Marcomannia. The thesis will be supported by archaeological data originating from excavations in the Roman installation at Mušov, Moravia, Czech Republic. The investigation will examine the history of the non-Roman region beyond the northern Danubian frontier, the character of Roman occupation and creation of other Roman provinces on the Danube, and consult primary sources and modern research on the topic of Roman expansion and empire building during the principate. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewso G I C a C a R P a T H I C281 a Vol
    A C T A A R C H A E O L REVIEWSO G I C A C A R P A T H I C281 A VOL. XLIX, 2014 PL ISSN 0001-5229 REVIEWS Rastko Vasic, Die Halsringe im Zentralbalkan. Vojvodina, Serbien, Kosovo und Mazedonien, Prähistorische Bronzefunde 11:7, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2010, 70 Seiten, 44 Tafeln; ISBN 978-3-515-09678-2. The monograph Die Halsringe im Zentralbalkan by Rastko Vasic is already his fourth scholarly contribution, published in the now respected Prähistorische Bronzefunde (PBF) series. His earlier studies addressed the subject of sickles1, brooches2 and dress pins3. Every one of them was the first monographic study of a given type of object in the central Balkans. This is true also of the study made by Rastko Vasic of neckrings from Vojvodina, Serbia, Kosovo and Macedonia. Given the extremely complicated political situation in the region and the fact that the materials, even if analysed, were published in different countries and languages, the study of neckrings must have run into quite a few obstacles. If only for this reason, the great labour put in by Rastko Vasic only to assemble his materials to this and to earlier monographs is worthy of recognition. Incidentally, the study under review is the seventh to be published in the PBF series dedicated to neckrings and neck ornaments. The earlier works concerned addressed the materials from south-western Germany4, Greece5, Slovakia6 and Poland7. Still, as noted earlier, this is the first work to discuss the materials from central Balkans. It might be more accurate to stress that this is the first contribution on some regions of the Balkans which have been overlooked here so far.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo
    CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo-European and Germanic Background Indo-European Background It has already been mentioned in this course that German and English are related languages. Two languages can be related to each other in much the same way that two people can be related to each other. If two people share a common ancestor, say their mother or their great-grandfather, then they are genetically related. Similarly, German and English are genetically related because they share a common ancestor, a language which was spoken in what is now northern Germany sometime before the Angles and the Saxons migrated to England. We do not have written records of this language, unfortunately, but we have a good idea of what it must have looked and sounded like. We have arrived at our conclusions as to what it looked and sounded like by comparing the sounds of words and morphemes in earlier written stages of English and German (and Dutch) and in modern-day English and German dialects. As a result of the comparisons we are able to reconstruct what the original language, called a proto-language, must have been like. This particular proto-language is usually referred to as Proto-West Germanic. The method of reconstruction based on comparison is called the comparative method. If faced with two languages the comparative method can tell us one of three things: 1) the two languages are related in that both are descended from a common ancestor, e.g. German and English, 2) the two are related in that one is the ancestor of the other, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Transylvania and the Transylvanian
    Transylvania Online THE HISTORY OF TRANSYLVANIA AND THE TRANSYLVANIAN SAXONS by Dr. Konrad Gündisch, Oldenburg, Germany Contents: 1. The Region: Land and People 1.1. Geography 1.2. Population and Ancient History 1.2.1. Prehistoric Era 1.2.2. Dacians and Romans 1.2.3. Period of Mass Folk Migrations 1.2.4 Integration into the Medieval Hungarian kingdom 2. The Migration and Settlement of the Transylvanian Saxons 2.1. The Hungarian Crown of King Stephen as "Host" 2.2. Origin of the Transylvanian Saxons 2.3. Progression of the Settlements 2.3.1. Beginning 2.3.2. Stages of Colonization 2.3.2.1. The Teutonic Knights in the Burzenland (Tara Bârsei) 2.3.3. Privileges 3. Political History and Economic Development During the Middle Ages 4. Early Recent History: Autonomous Principality Transylvania 5. Province of the Hapsburg Empire 6. Part of the Kingdom of Greater Romania 7. Under Communist Rule Centuries of History Fading "Siebenbürgen und die Siebenbürger Sachsen" was written in German by Dr. Konrad Gündisch, Oldenburg, Germany. The English translation "Transylvania and the Transylvanian Saxons" was written by Georg Schuller, Edmonton, Canada. 1. The Region: Land and People 1.1. Geography Atlantean and satellite maps of eastern Europe show the topography of Transylvania as a clearly definable geographic region. It is comparable with a natural fortress, a mountainous region almost completely barrier-like enclosed by the East and South Carpathians and the Transylvanian West Mountains, sheltering the Transylvanian Depression in the centre. This Transylvanian Basin or Plateau is partitioned by three rivers, the Mures, Olsul and Somesu (Mieresch, Alt/Olt, Somesch), all tributaries of the Danube.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Examination of the Arch of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus at Oea Rachel Meyers Iowa State University, [email protected]
    World Languages and Cultures Publications World Languages and Cultures 2017 A New Examination of the Arch of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus at Oea Rachel Meyers Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/language_pubs Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the History of Gender Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ language_pubs/130. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the World Languages and Cultures at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Languages and Cultures Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A New Examination of the Arch of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus at Oea Abstract The ra ch dedicated to Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus at Oea was an important component in that town’s building activity. By situating the arch within its socio-historical context and acknowledging the political identity of Oea and nearby towns, this article shows that the arch at Oea far surpassed nearby contemporary arches in style, material, and execution. Further, this article demonstrates that the arch was a key element in Oea’s Roman identity. Finally, the article bridges disciplinary boundaries by bringing together art historical analysis with the concepts of euergetism, Roman civic status, and inter-city rivalry in the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-10,982
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. White the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Balance and Decline of Trade in Early Andhra: (With Special Reference to Roman Contacts)
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Balance and Decline of Trade in Early Andhra: (With special reference to Roman contacts) Dr. G. Mannepalli * Faculty Member,Dept. of History & Archaeology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh Abstract- The history of early Indian trade also shows a distinct A few words may be said here with regarded to the influence preference for the study of long-distance trade-both over land of the ocean upon the life of the Andhra people close association and overseas –the study of exports and imports, especially their with the sea made the inhabitants of the coastal regions fearless possible identifications on a modern map. The other common and adventurous sailors. The idea conquering the sea always feature in this historiography is to present urban centers almost haunted them and the result was the discovery of a number of invariably as thriving commercial canters and to hold places hitherto unknown to them. Going there both as colonists commercial exchanges as the principal causative factor towards and traders they also widened the geographical horizon of Indian urbanization. Without belittling the importance of this civilization. Levi (pre -Aryan and pre- Dravidian) has pointed out conventional narrative approach to the history of trade; it must be that the sea-routes to the East from the ports of South India had emphasized that an understanding of trade and urban centers can come in to common use many centuries before the Christian era. hardly be delinked from the agrarian sector. Significantly Trade relations with the West also opened well before said era.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Ancient Germania
    Mapping Ancient Germania Berlin Researchers Crack the Ptolemy Code By Matthias Schulz , 10/01/2010 A 2nd century map of Germania by the scholar Ptolemy has always stumped scholars, who were unable to relate the places depicted to known settlements. Now a team of researchers have cracked the code, revealing that half of Germany's cities are 1,000 years older than previously thought. The founding of Rome has been pinpointed to the year 753. For the city of St. Petersburg, records even indicate the precise day the first foundation stone was laid. Historians don't have access to this kind of precision when it comes to German cities like Hanover, Kiel or Bad Driburg. The early histories of nearly all the German cities east of the Rhine are obscure, and the places themselves are not mentioned in documents until the Middle Ages. So far, no one has been able to date the founding of these cities. Our ancestors' lack of education is to blame for this dearth of knowledge. Germanic tribes certainly didn't run land survey offices -- they couldn't even write. Inhabitants this side of the Rhine -- the side the Romans never managed to occupy permanently -- used only a clumsy system of runes. According to the Roman historian Tacitus, people here lived in thatched huts and dugout houses, subsisting on barley soup and indulging excessively in dice games. Not much more is known, as there are next to no written records of life within the barbarians' lands. Astonishing New Map That may now be changing. A group of classical philologists, mathematical historians and surveying experts at Berlin Technical University's Department for Geodesy and Geoinformation Science has produced an astonishing map of central Europe as it was 2,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Roots of the Legends of King Arthur
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY IN BRNO FACULTY OF ARTS Department of English and American Studies Iranian Roots of the Legends of King Arthur Baccalaureate Thesis Lucie Málková Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Milada Franková, CSc., M.A. UČO: 74863 Field of studies: CJV - ANJ Year of matriculation: 2002 Brno, July 2006 I declare that I have worked on thisbaccalaureate thesisindependently, using only primaryand secondarysourceslisted in the bibliography. Lucie Málková Brno, July2006 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor doc. Mgr. Milada Franková, CSc., M.A. for her patience, kind and valuable advice. 3 Let me thank once again to Petr Preclík who provided me with valuable sources, professional help and advice and in the first place with the topicof mypaper. 4 CONTENT CONTENT 5 INTRODUCTION 6 METHODOLOGY 7 THEORETICALCONCEPTOFMYTHOLOGY 8 DEALING WITHTHE HISTORICALKING ARTHUR 10 Geoffrey Ashe’s Riothamus theory 10 Thomas Green’s No-real Arthur theory 13 Littleton and Malcor’s Iranian theory 15 CAUCASUSCONCEPTIONOF ARTHURIANCYCLE 17 Terminology 17 Littleton and Malcor’s two models for King Arthur 19 The Arthur – Batraz Connection 20 The Lancelot – Batraz Connection 24 Other influences 27 POSITION OFLITTLETONAND MALCOR’S WORKINACADEMICDISCOURSE 28 CONCLUSION 30 BIBLIOGRAPHY 31 Literary sources – works cited and consulted 31 Online sources – works cited and consulted 31 ANOTACE 33 5 INTRODUCTION The storyof King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table is perhaps the best known and the most influential legend in the world. No other legend or myth has had greater influence on modern culture. AsJohn Colarusso saysin hisforeword to Littleton and Malcor’sbook“no one writesplaysor musicalsbased on the Rg Veda , on the Iliad or Odyssey , on Beowulf or, with the exception of Wagner, on the Norse tales.” 1 Yet there isa number of stories, theatre playseven computer games based on the Arthurian cycle, directorsstill shoot movie about Arthur and there are Arthurian societies all around the world – The International Arthurian Society or Casque and Gauntlet to name a few 2.
    [Show full text]