DOCSLIB.ORG

Joining the Athenian Community Proefschrift Sara Maria Wijma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joining the Athenian Community Proefschrift Sara Maria Wijma Joining the Athenian community The participation of metics in Athenian polis religion in the fifth and fourth centuries B.C. Toetreden tot de Atheense gemeenschap De deelname van metoiken aan de Atheense polis religie in de vijfde en vierde eeuw v. Chr. (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. J.C. Stoof, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 24 februari 2010 des middags te 4.15 uur door Sara Maria Wijma geboren op 6 mei 1978 te Amsterdam Promotor: Prof. dr. J.H. Blok Co-promotor: Dr. S.D. Lambert Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................i Preface ....................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations .........................................................................................................vi Metics in history .................................................................................................... 1 1 Metics in classical Athens ..................................................................................... 1 2 Metics in modern times: from morality to ideology ............................................. 7 3 Membership of the Athenian community: sharing in polis rites ......................... 10 4 Greek religion and society: from cult to polis community ................................. 13 5 Variety in membership: the negotiation of status ............................................... 19 6 Metics in polis religion: some parameters .......................................................... 23 Metics at the Panathenaia .................................................................................. 27 1 Resident foreigners at the Panathenaia ............................................................... 29 1.1 The Panathenaia .......................................................................................... 29 1.2 (Resident) foreigners at the Panathenaic agones ........................................ 31 1.3 Resident foreigners and the Panathenaic sacrifices .................................... 32 2 The Panathenaic procession ................................................................................ 36 2.1 The marching contingents in the Panathenaic procession .......................... 37 2.2 Inclusiveness vs. selective and differentiated participation ........................ 40 3 Metics at the Panathenaia .................................................................................... 43 3.1 The testimonia ............................................................................................. 43 3.2 Skaphephoroi .............................................................................................. 45 3.3 Hydriaphoroi ............................................................................................... 48 3.4 Skiadephoroi ............................................................................................... 50 3.5 Diphrophoroi .............................................................................................. 51 4 Honour or humiliation? ....................................................................................... 54 5 What the future beholds - the metic promise ...................................................... 61 5.1 Groups in transition ..................................................................................... 61 5.2 With whom I march .................................................................................... 63 5.3 Kanephoroi ................................................................................................. 65 5.4 Thallophoroi ............................................................................................... 69 5.5 Ephebes ....................................................................................................... 72 5.6 Differentiation: the contributions of the metic population of Athens ......... 76 6 Defining the new metic members of the Athenian community .......................... 78 i Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 83 Metics at other polis festivals ............................................................................. 85 1 Metics at the Lenaia – a showcase of unity ........................................................ 87 1.1 The Lenaia – ancient, Athenian and intimate ............................................. 88 1.2 Metics at the Lenaia – spectators, chorus-members, choregoi ................... 92 1.3 The truth in Aristophanes: being amongst themselves ............................... 96 1.4 Aristophanes revisited: the lesser part of grain ......................................... 101 1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 103 2 Metics at the City Dionysia – the Athenians and other Greeks ........................ 104 2.1 The City Dionysia – Athenian competitors, Panhellenic crowd ............... 106 2.2 Metics in the procession: skaphephoroi .................................................... 113 2.3 Resident foreigners in the audience: the other Greeks .............................. 117 2.4 The agones: the exclusion of xenoi from the choral competitions ........... 123 3 Metics at the Hephaisteia – the young, strong men of Athens .......................... 128 3.1 The Hephaisteia of 421: new, reorganised, or single celebration? ........... 129 3.2 Metic participation in the Hephaisteia ...................................................... 135 3.3 The reorganisation of the Hephaisteia and the metics of Athens .............. 143 4 Metics at the Eleusinian Mysteries ................................................................... 151 4.1 The Eleusinian Mysteries: Panhellenic attendance ................................... 152 4.2 The Mysteries in the classical period ........................................................ 156 4.3 The Mysteries: an Athenian affair ............................................................ 160 4.4 Lysias and his lover: metic ........................................................... 163 4.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 168 Immigrants in the demes .................................................................................. 171 1 Deme membership: active participation in deme affairs .................................. 173 1.1 Demes before and after Kleisthenes ......................................................... 173 1.2 The constitutional deme ............................................................................ 178 1.3 : active participation in deme affairs ............................... 180 1.4 The deme and its “foreign” residents ........................................................ 184 2 Metics in the city deme Skambonidai ............................................................... 187 2.1 Resident foreigners in Skambonidai ......................................................... 188 2.2 A lex sacra from Skambonidai ................................................................. 189 2.3 A sacrifice to the hero Leos ...................................................................... 194 2.4 The answer of the Skambonidai ................................................................ 198 3 The other residents in Ikarion and Phrearrhioi ................................................. 200 3.1 The Ikarian choregia for Dionysos: IG I³ 254 .......................................... 200 3.2 “Those living in Ikarion” .......................................................................... 203 3.3 Dionysos in Ikarion ................................................................................... 206 3.4 The rural Dionysia in Attica ..................................................................... 208 3.5 The motivation of the Ikarieis ................................................................... 215 3.6 The others in Phrearrhioi .......................................................................... 217 ii 4 Awarding individual benefactors – a Theban in Eleusis .................................. 222 4.1 The Eleusinians honour Damasias son of Dionysos of Thebes ................ 223 4.2 Demes honouring outsiders ....................................................................... 229 4.3 : a means to integrate ............. 231 4.4 “Granting” deme membership .................................................................. 236 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 237 Appendix: the rendering of the names of choregoi in demes ................................... 241 Bend it like Bendis ............................................................................................. 243 1 Thracians in Attika ............................................................................................ 245 1.1 From plague to ........................................................................ 245 1.2 Thracian mercenaries: from Peisistratos onto the Parthenon Frieze ......... 246 1.3 Athenian-Thracian marriages: Tereus and Prokne in real life .................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków*
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 21 (2014): 21–41 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.14.001.2778 www.ejournals.eu/electrum THE CULT OF THE PTOLEMIES IN THE AEGEAN IN THE 3RD CENTURY BC Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków* Abstract: The cult of the Ptolemies spread in various ways. Apart from the Lagids, the initiative came from poleis themselves; private cult was also very important. The ruler cult, both that organ- ised directly by the Ptolemaic authorities and that established by poleis, was tangibly benefi cial for the Ptolemaic foreign policy. The dynastic cult became one of the basic instruments of political activity in the region, alongside acts of euergetism. It seems that Ptolemy II played the biggest role in introducing the ruler cult as a foreign policy measure. He was probably responsible for bringing his father’s nickname Soter to prominence. He also played the decisive role in popularising the cult of Arsinoe II, emphasising her role as protector of sailors and guarantor of the monarchy’s prosperity and linking her to cults accentuating the warrior nature of female deities. Ptolemy II also used dynastic festivals as vehicles of dynastic propaganda and ideology and a means to popu- larise the cult. The ruler cult became one of the means of communication between the subordinate cities and the Ptolemies. It also turned out to be an important platform in contacts with the poleis which were loosely or not at all subjugated by the Lagids. The establishment of divine honours for the Ptolemies by a polis facilitated closer relations and created a friendly atmosphere and a certain emotional bond.
    [Show full text]
  • Transantiquity
    TransAntiquity TransAntiquity explores transgender practices, in particular cross-dressing, and their literary and figurative representations in antiquity. It offers a ground-breaking study of cross-dressing, both the social practice and its conceptualization, and its interaction with normative prescriptions on gender and sexuality in the ancient Mediterranean world. Special attention is paid to the reactions of the societies of the time, the impact transgender practices had on individuals’ symbolic and social capital, as well as the reactions of institutionalized power and the juridical systems. The variety of subjects and approaches demonstrates just how complex and widespread “transgender dynamics” were in antiquity. Domitilla Campanile (PhD 1992) is Associate Professor of Roman History at the University of Pisa, Italy. Filippo Carlà-Uhink is Lecturer in Classics and Ancient History at the University of Exeter, UK. After studying in Turin and Udine, he worked as a lecturer at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, and as Assistant Professor for Cultural History of Antiquity at the University of Mainz, Germany. Margherita Facella is Associate Professor of Greek History at the University of Pisa, Italy. She was Visiting Associate Professor at Northwestern University, USA, and a Research Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at the University of Münster, Germany. Routledge monographs in classical studies Menander in Contexts Athens Transformed, 404–262 BC Edited by Alan H. Sommerstein From popular sovereignty to the dominion
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Lenaia
    The Post Hole Issue 42 Reconstructing the Lenaia Peter Swallow 1 1 School of Classics, Swallowgate, Butts Wynd, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL Email: [email protected] The best-known of the Athenian dramatic festivals is the City Dionysia; a huge civic festival which took place in the Greek month of Elaphebolion, which equates to our late March (Csapo and Williams 1998, 105) and attracted audiences from all over Greece. However, Greek drama was not confined to the City Dionysia (or even to Athens). A number of smaller festivals included dramatic performances, many of which took place on a smaller scale amid rural Attic demes (Haigh 1907, 29)1. Meanwhile, the polis-wide Lenaia was celebrated in the Athenian month of Gamelion, which is approximate to our January. Details on the festival are scant, but with careful investigation we can begin to build up a bigger picture. Two poets presented a pair of tragedies at the Lenaia (compared to three poets with trilogies at the City Dionysia), but later the number of pairs was increased to three (Csapo and Slater 1998, 136f, III.74-III.75). There is no evidence to suggest that any satyr plays were performed. During Aristophanes’ career, three comedies were performed (Pickard-Cambridge 1973, 25), but a list of Lenaian comedies performed in 285/4 indicates that there were five (Csapo and Slater 1998, 137, III.77). Csapo and Slater (1998, 124) reiterate “the usual handbook dogma that five comedies were regularly produced at the Lenaea except during the Peloponnesian War” but equally, we might hypothesise that the number started out as three regardless of the war, and was later increased to five.
    [Show full text]
  • Blindness and Insight in Argos: Narrators and Audiences in Callimachus Fifth Hymn (The Bath of Pallas)
    Blindness and Insight in Argos: Narrators and Audiences in Callimachus Fifth Hymn (The Bath of Pallas) Thomas A. Schmitz (Universität Bonn) Alphabetic writing was introduced into the Greek world during the eighth century BCE, basic literacy spread in the seventh and sixth centuries, and reading became a mode of reception of literature during the fifth century.1 Yet it was only in the late fourth and third centuries BCE that the full impact of reading and writing became clear. One decisive factor was the ‘globalization’ of Greek culture through the conquests of Alexander the Great: authors were no longer producing primarily for members of their own community (in general, the city-state), but they were now writing for a reading public scattered through vast geographical areas. Another factor was a new way of relating to cultural tradition: there was a large number of Greeks throughout the Hellenistic world who were no longer living in their ancestral cities; new Greek communities were founded, and their inhabitants had to find new ways to develop and preserve a cultural identity. Culture had to become relocatable, and written texts were perhaps the easiest way to provide this diaspora with a tradition that they could relate to.2 This development is especially visible in Alexandria: founded by Alexander the Great himself, this city in Egypt was home to a powerful dynasty of Greek rulers, the Ptolemies, who went to great length to demonstrate their Greek heritage.The most conspicuous symbol was undoubtedly the great Library, which was to influence the fate of Greek texts for several centuries.3 174 Its aim was to collect all Greek literature written in the preceding centuries, and thus to become a universal lieu de mémoire | of Greek culture in a foreign environment and a prominent symbol of 175 Ptolemaic power.4 We must remember that the Alexandrian Library was as momentous for the literary production of its own days as it was for the transmission of Greek texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 12 | 1999 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.724 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1999 Number of pages: 207-292 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 », Kernos [Online], 12 | 1999, Online since 13 April 2011, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 Kernos Kemos, 12 (1999), p. 207-292. Epigtoaphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 (EBGR 1996) The ninth issue of the BEGR contains only part of the epigraphie harvest of 1996; unforeseen circumstances have prevented me and my collaborators from covering all the publications of 1996, but we hope to close the gaps next year. We have also made several additions to previous issues. In the past years the BEGR had often summarized publications which were not primarily of epigraphie nature, thus tending to expand into an unavoidably incomplete bibliography of Greek religion. From this issue on we return to the original scope of this bulletin, whieh is to provide information on new epigraphie finds, new interpretations of inscriptions, epigraphieal corpora, and studies based p;imarily on the epigraphie material. Only if we focus on these types of books and articles, will we be able to present the newpublications without delays and, hopefully, without too many omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Protagoras? • Born in Abdêra, an Ionian Pólis in Thrace
    Recovering the wisdom of Protagoras from a reinterpretation of the Prometheia trilogy Prometheus (c.1933) by Paul Manship (1885-1966) By: Marty Sulek, Ph.D. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy For: Workshop In Multidisciplinary Philanthropic Studies February 10, 2015 Composed for inclusion in a Festschrift in honour of Dr. Laurence Lampert, a Canadian philosopher and leading scholar in the field of Nietzsche studies, and a professor emeritus of Philosophy at IUPUI. Adult Content Warning • Nudity • Sex • Violence • And other inappropriate Prometheus Chained by Vulcan (1623) themes… by Dirck van Baburen (1595-1624) Nietzsche on Protagoras & the Sophists “The Greek culture of the Sophists had developed out of all the Greek instincts; it belongs to the culture of the Periclean age as necessarily as Plato does not: it has its predecessors in Heraclitus, in Democritus, in the scientific types of the old philosophy; it finds expression in, e.g., the high culture of Thucydides. And – it has ultimately shown itself to be right: every advance in epistemological and moral knowledge has reinstated the Sophists – Our contemporary way of thinking is to a great extent Heraclitean, Democritean, and Protagorean: it suffices to say it is Protagorean, because Protagoras represented a synthesis of Heraclitus and Democritus.” Nietzsche, The Will to Power, 2.428 Reappraisals of the authorship & dating of the Prometheia trilogy • Traditionally thought to have been composed by Aeschylus (c.525-c.456 BCE). • More recent scholarship has demonstrated the play to have been written by a later, lesser author sometime in the 430s. • This new dating raises many questions as to what contemporary events the trilogy may be referring.
    [Show full text]
  • ATHENIAN Make Up
    The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia The Chorus, the City and the Stage Peter Wilson University of Warwick The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge , UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk West th Street, New York, -, USA http://www.cup.org Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne , Australia © Cambridge University Press This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge 1 Typeset in Bembo ⁄2/ [] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library hardback Contents List of illustrations page x Preface xiii List of abbreviations xiv Introduction Part I THE INSTITUTION Private wealth for public performance A cultural revolution? Festival leitourgiai Serving Dionysos: the City Dionysia Processional leitourgiai: place and service in the city The Lenaia Anthesteria Service for Apollo Dancing for Hephaistos and Prometheus? Panathenaia Other services An ‘international’ khoregia ‘Whoever honours the gods best with khoroi are the best in war . .’ Organisation and operation The city and its khoregoi Appointment After nomination Poets, patrons and the polis The tasks of the khoregos vii In the khoregeion Recruitment Civic purity Training Materials of performance The politics
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend
    G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image .
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011)
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 27 | 2014 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2266 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2266 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2014 Number of pages: 321-378 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) », Kernos [Online], 27 | 2014, Online since 01 October 2016, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/2266 This text was automatically generated on 15 September 2020. Kernos Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) 1 Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) Angelos Chaniotis 1 The 24th issue of the Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion presents epigraphic publications of 2011 and additions to earlier issues (publications of 2006–2010). Publications that could not be considered here, for reasons of space, will be presented in EBGR 2012. They include two of the most important books of 2011: N. PAPAZARKADAS’ Sacred and Public Land in Ancient Athens, Oxford 2011 and H.S. VERSNEL’s Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology, Leiden 2011. 2 A series of new important corpora is included in this issue. Two new IG volumes present the inscriptions of Eastern Lokris (119) and the first part of the inscriptions of Kos (21); the latter corpus is of great significance for the study of Greek religion, as it contains a large number of cult regulations; among the new texts, we single out the ‘sacred law of the tribe of the Elpanoridai’ in Halasarna.
    [Show full text]
  • VI the Voice of the Workshop: Signatures As a Source of Information on Potters, Painters and the Ways They Worked Together
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC) Stissi, V.V. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Stissi, V. V. (2002). Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 VI The voice of the workshop: signatures as a source of information on potters, painters and the ways they worked together 97 VI. 1 Introduction: much discussion, little progress
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult
    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    OBJECT LIST Note: Images for objects marked with ** are available on request. INTRODUCTION Amphora with the Birth of Athena Terracotta, H. 40.9 cm Statue of a Young Boy Attic black-figure, attributed to Marble, H. 87.6 cm Group E, ca. 550 BC Hellenistic, 2nd cent. BC–1st cent. AD New Haven, Yale University Art Virginia Museum of Fine Arts Museum Adolph D. and Wilkins C. Williams Fund Leonard C. Hanna, Jr., B.A., 1913 Fund ** Grave Stele of Girl Apollonia Marble, H. 112.4 cm, W. 63.5 cm, Calyx-Krater with Birth of D. 20 cm Erichthonios Hellenistic, ca. 100 BC Terracotta, H.37.9 cm. J. Paul Getty Museum Attic red-figure, attributed to the Nikias painter, ca. 400 BC Virginia Museum of Fine Arts MYTH Purchase, The Glasgow Fund Statue of a Child Hero, possibly Herakles Statuette of Silenos and Dionysos Bronze, H. 62.2 cm Terracotta, H. 12.7 cm Hellenistic, first century B.C. Late Classical, ca. 350 BC The Saint Louis Art Museum Walters Art Museum, Baltimore Stamnos with Theseus and the Minotaur Amphora with Achilles and the Terracotta, H. 36.4 cm Centaur Chiron Attic red-figure, attributed to the Terracotta, H. 41.3 cm Copenhagen Painter, ca. 470 BC Attic black-figure, attributed to the Private Collection Group of Würzburg 199, ca. 520–510 BC Calyx Krater with Medea’s Murdered Walters Art Museum, Baltimore Children; Baby Orestes Terracotta, H. 50.5 cm, Diam. 49.9 cm Coin with Hermes and Arkas Lucanian red-figure calyx-krater, Silver stater attributed to near the Policoro Painter, Pheneos, Arcadia, ca.
    [Show full text]