DOCSLIB.ORG

Lahr Vs. NTSB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lahr Vs. NTSB 1 JOHN H. CLARKE [Pro Hac Vice] 2 Telephone: (202) 332-3030 JOHN F. DUNNE, JR. [SBN 32854] 3 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard 4 Second Floor, South Tower 5 Santa Monica, California 90404-4084 Telephone: (310) 393-9351 6 Facsimile: (310) 230-4066 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 H. RAY LAHR, ) Case No. 02-8708 AHM (RZx) ) 13 Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO 14 ) DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR v. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT: 15 ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS 16 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION ) AND AUTHORITIES AND 17 SAFETY BOARD, et al. ) DECLARATION OF JOHN H. ) CLARKE AND LODGED 18 Defendants. ) VIDEOTAPES IN SUPPORT 19 ) THEREOF 20 Date: December 15, 2003 21 Time: 10:00. a.m. 22 Place: Courtroom 14, 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 23 Judge: Honorable A. Howard Matz 24 (1) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 25 26 (2) DECLARATION OF JOHN H. CLARKE A. Affidavit of Brett Hoffstadt 27 B. Affidavit of Darryl Hambley 28 C. Affidavits of Rear Admiral Clarence A. Hill, Jr., USN (Ret) D. Affidavit of Robert Donaldson -1- 1 E. Affidavits of Thomas Stalcup, Ph.D. 2 F. Affidavit of David Neal G. Affidavit of Marge Krugar 3 H. Affidavit of Gregory A. Harrison, Ph.D., P.E. 4 I. Affidavit of Michael Hull, Ph.D. 5 J. Affidavit of James A. Holtsclaw K. Affidavits of James D. Sanders 6 L. Affidavit of James Speer 7 M. Affidavit of Captain Richard Russell N. Affidavit of Vincent Fuschetti 8 O. Affidavit of Major Fred Meyer (Ret.) 9 P. Affidavits of Dwight Brumley Q. Affidavit of Dr. Vernon Gross 10 R. Affidavit of Mike Wire 11 S. Affidavit of Paul Angelides 12 T. Captain David McClaine U. Affidavit of Lisa Perry 13 V. Affidavit of Colonel Lawrence Pence USAF (Ret) 14 W. Affidavit of Michael F. Rivero X. Affidavit of Captain H. Ray Lahr (Ret.) 15 16 (3) LODGED VIDEOTAPES 17 1. EXPERTS 2. EXPERT EYEWITNESSES 18 3. EYEWITNESSES 19 4. ANIMATIONS 4 (a) ANIMATION 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff will and hereby does oppose 23 defendants' motion for summary judgment, on the grounds that genuine issues of 24 material fact remain at issue and therefore defendants are not entitled to entry of 25 judgment as a matter of law under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 26 This opposition is and will be based on the accompanying Memorandum of 27 Points and Authorities; the attached Declaration of John H. Clarke and the exhibits 28 thereto; the videotapes lodged herein; and the record in this case and such oral argument as may be presented at the motion hearing. -2- 1 DATED: November 14, 2003. 2 3 4 By 5 JOHN H. CLARKE Attorney for Plaintiff H. Ray Lahr 6 7 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES 8 I. BACKGROUND. 11 9 10 II. NTSB HAS NO DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGE. 12 11 A. Not deliberative records. 12 B. Exemption 5 does not apply to factual documents. 13 12 C. No protection for records adopted in agency disposition. 13 13 III. NTSB'S VAUGHN INDEX GROSSLY INADEQUATE. 14 14 A. Deliberative process claims. 14 15 B. Failure to identify or produce records. 15 16 IV. BOEING HAS NO PROPRIETARY INTEREST. 17 17 A. Already public. .17 18 B. Boeing's performance data not proprietary. 19 C. Broader protection for "voluntarily produced" records 19 unavailable. 20 20 D. Boeing contemporaneous press release belies its present claim. 21 21 E. Insufficient explanation of how release 22 could cause substantial competitive harm. .21 23 V. FOIA'S BALANCING TEST MANDATES DISCLOSURE. 22 24 A. Trade secrets. 24 25 B. Party Process violations. 25 1. Eyewitnesses. 25 26 2. Zoom-climb records at issue. 26 27 3. Public safety. 27 28 C. Genesis and chronology of zoom-climb hypothesis. 28 ● December 30, 1996 – CIA idea. 28 -3- 1 ● November 17, 1997 – broadcast 2 of CIA-produced animation. 28 ● November 17, 1997 – Boeing's 3 contemporaneous press release. .29 4 ● December 8, 1997 – release of 5 NTSB-produced animations. 29 ● December 8, 1997 – release of NTSB 6 Exhibit 4-A; not in public docket. 29 7 D. NTSB bad faith fuels controversy & publicity. 30 1. Party members smuggled out evidence – necessitated 8 by illegal FBI takeover and party process violations. 30 9 2. NTSB deleted data. 30 3. Zoom-climb did not happen. 31 10 4. Zoom-climb could not happen. 33 11 CONCLUSION. 34 12 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 13 14 Cases Page Favish v. OIC, 217 F.3d at 1172 (9th Cir. 2000) . .12, 22, 24 15 EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 89 (1973) . 13 16 Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy, 17 617 F.2d 854, 867.(D.C. Cir. 1980) . 13 Playboy Enterprise v. Dept. of Justice, 18 677 F.2d 931, 935-36 (DC Cir. 1982) . 13 19 Union of Concerned Scientists v. NRC, 824 F.2d 1219 (D.C. Cir 1987) . 13 20 Bristol-Meyers v. FTC, 589 F.2d 18, 25 (D.C. Cir. 1978) . 14 21 Niemeier v. Watergate Spec. Prosecution Force, 565 F.2d 967, 971-72 (7th Cir. 1977) . 14 22 Krikorian v. Department of State, 23 984 F.2d 461, 467 (D.C. Cir. 1993) . 16 24 Hughes Aircraft v. Schlesinger, 384 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1974) . 19 25 Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Food & Drug Admin., 26 704 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1983). 19, 22, 24 Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 27 975 F. 2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (en banc) cert. denied, 28 507 US 984 (1993) . 20 -4- 1 National Parks & Conservation Ass’n v. Morton, 2 498 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir.1974) . 20 Weiner v. F.B.I., 943 F.2d 972, 977-78 (9th Cir. 1991) . 21 3 Hayden v. NSA, 608 F.2d 1381, 1390 (D.C. Cir. 1979), 4 cert. denied, 446 US 937 (1980) . 21 5 United Sates Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 772-73 (1989) . 22 6 Crooker v. United States Parole Commission, 7 776 F. 2d 366, 367 (1st Cir. 1985) . 22 Jones v. FBI, 41 F.3d 238 (6th Cir. 1994) . 23 8 Castaneda v. United States, 757 F.2d 1010. .24, 30 9 Hunt v. FBI, 972 F.2d 286, 289 (9th Cir.1992) . 24 Stern v. FBI, 10 737 F.2d 84, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1984) . 24 11 Washington Post Co. v. Department of Health and Human Services, 12 690 F.2d 252, 268 (D.C. Cir. 1982), after remand, 795 F.2d 205 (D.C. Cir. 1986), subsequent opinion, 865 F.2d 320 (D.C. Cir. 1989) . 25 13 Beck v. Department of Justice, 14 997 F.2d 1489, 1492-94 (D.C. Cir 1993) . 30 Hardy v. FBI, 15 No. 95-883, slip op at 21 (D. Ariz. July 29, 1997) . 30 16 Weiner v. FBI, 17 No. 83-1720, slip op. at 7 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 1995) . 30 18 Statutes 19 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) . 12 Fed. R. Ev. 105. 23 20 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) . 11, 17 21 49 U.S.C. § 1131 . 25, 26 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) . 34 22 23 OFFER OF PROOF 24 Bates A Affidavit of Brett Hoffstadt. 35-36 25 CV . 37-38 26 B Affidavit of Darryl Hambley. 40 C Affidavits of Rear Admiral Clarence A. Hill, Jr., USN (Ret) . 41-51 27 D Affidavit of Robert Donaldson. 28 Exhibit 1: Letter from Commander William S. Donaldson, USN Ret. to NTSB Chairman James Hall, February 19, 2000, -5- 1 (4 pages & 3 attachments: Comparison of 2 figurers in 2 NTSB 22c, Islip Primary Hits, and Comparison of a Normal Ballistic Fall with the NTSB and CIA Climb 3 Theory (Exhibit 23 below)) . .68-74 4 Exhibit 2: TAGS Database, 2-page excerpt . 75-76 5 Exhibit 3: TWA Flight 800 Debris Field. 77 Exhibit 4: INTERIM REPORT ON THE CRASH OF TWA FLIGHT 800 6 AND THE ACTIONS OF THE NTSB AND THE FBI, BY 7 CMDR. WILLIAM S. DONALDSON, USN RET. IN COOPERATION WITH THE ASSOCIATION OF 8 RETIRED AVIATION PROFESSIONALS FOR THE 9 COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION 10 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JULY 17, 1998 11 Table of Contents (3 pages) . .78-80 12 Exhibit 5: NTSB Radar Overhead View Exhibit 13A Attachment IV–5, (graphic) to Airplane Performance Study. 81 13 Exhibit 6: Composite of two Letters – April 1998 letter from 14 Congressman James J. Trafficant (D) Ohio and July 27, 1998 response from Lewis D. Schiliro, Acting FBI Assistant 15 Director-in-Charge (2 pages) . 82-83 16 Exhibit 7: One-page transcript of telephone conversation with 17 FBI N.Y. Field Office SAC James K. Kallstrom, two-page affidavit of Reed Irvine including authentication 18 (3 pages) . 84-86 19 Exhibit 8: Raw Radar Data, excerpt Islip Radar, xy coordinates for Excel Program. 87 20 Exhibit 9: Composite Radar, Graphic. 88 21 Exhibit 10: Debris Field, graphic, blowup Composite Radar Plot highlights Crosswind Blast Debris. 89 22 Exhibit 11: Debris Field, graphic, blowup, Composite Radar Plot 23 Location of debris from nose in yellow debris field 24 Green debris field location of main aircraft body, wings and tail section. 90 25 Exhibit 12: Plot of Aircraft Track by 3 Radars, graphic. 91 26 Exhibit 13: NTSB Debris Plot NTSB Wreckage Distribution Diagram.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airline Competition Plan Final Report
    Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 SUMMARY S-1 Summary AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN Philadelphia International Airport The City of Philadelphia, owner and operator of Philadelphia International Airport, is required to submit annually to the Federal Aviation Administration an airline competition plan. The City’s plan for 2000, as documented in the accompanying report, provides information regarding the availability of passenger terminal facilities, the use of passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues to fund terminal facilities, airline leasing arrangements, patterns of airline service, and average airfares for passengers originating their journeys at the Airport. The plan also sets forth the City’s current and planned initiatives to encourage competitive airline service at the Airport, construct terminal facilities needed to accommodate additional airline service, and ensure that access is provided to airlines wishing to serve the Airport on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms. These initiatives are summarized in the following paragraphs. Encourage New Airline Service Airlines that have recently started scheduled domestic service at Philadelphia International Airport include AirTran Airways, America West Airlines, American Trans Air, Midway Airlines, Midwest Express Airlines, and National Airlines. Airlines that have recently started scheduled international service at the Airport include Air France and Lufthansa. The City intends to continue its programs to encourage airlines to begin or increase service at the Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report
    Catalogue no. 51-205-XIE Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report 2005 How to obtain more information Specific inquiries about this product and related statistics or services should be directed to: Aviation Statistics Centre, Transportation Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0T6 (Telephone: 1-613-951-0068; Internet: [email protected]). For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our website at www.statcan.ca. National inquiries line 1-800-263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1-800-700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1-800-889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Website www.statcan.ca Information to access the product This product, catalogue no. 51-205-XIE, is available for free in electronic format. To obtain a single issue, visit our website at www.statcan.ca and select Publications. Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are also published on www.statcan.ca under About us > Providing services to Canadians. Statistics Canada Transportation Division Aviation Statistics Centre Air Passenger Origin and Destination, Canada-United States Report 2005 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Minister of Industry, 2007 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Tilts Playing Field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected]
    Equity Research Airlines / Rated: Market Underweight September 15, 2005 Research Analyst(s): David Strine 212 272-7869 [email protected] Bankruptcy tilts playing field Frank Boroch, CFA 212 272-6335 [email protected] Key Points *** TWIN BANKRUPTCY FILINGS TILT PLAYING FIELD. NWAC and DAL filed for Chapter 11 protection yesterday, becoming the 20 and 21st airlines to do so since 2000. Now with 47% of industry capacity in bankruptcy, the playing field looks set to become even more lopsided pressuring non-bankrupt legacies to lower costs further and low cost carriers to reassess their shrinking CASM advantage. *** CAPACITY PULLBACK. Over the past 20 years, bankrupt carriers decreased capacity by 5-10% on avg in the year following their filing. If we assume DAL and NWAC shrink by 7.5% (the midpoint) in '06, our domestic industry ASM forecast goes from +2% y/y to flat, which could potentially be favorable for airline pricing (yields). *** NWAC AND DAL INTIMATE CAPACITY RESTRAINT. After their filing yesterday, NWAC's CEO indicated 4Q:05 capacity could decline 5-6% y/y, while Delta announced plans to accelerate its fleet simplification plan, removing four aircraft types by the end of 2006. *** BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES LIKELY TO BE LOW COST CARRIERS. NWAC and DAL account for roughly 26% of domestic capacity, which, if trimmed by 7.5% equates to a 2% pt reduction in industry capacity. We believe LCC-heavy routes are likely to see a disproportionate benefit from potential reductions at DAL and NWAC, with AAI, AWA, and JBLU in particular having an easier path for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncontrolled Descent and Collision with Terrain, United Airlines 585
    PB2001-910401 NTSB/AAR-01/01 DCA91MA023 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 5498C Aircraft Accident Report Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain United Airlines Flight 585 Boeing 737-200, N999UA 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport Colorado Springs, Colorado March 3, 1991 RAN S P T O L R A T LURIBUS N P UNUM A E O T I I O T N A N S A D FE R NTSB/AAR-01/01 T Y B OA PB2001-910401 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 5498C 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted March 27, 2001 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2001. Uncontrolled Descent and Collision With Terrain, United Airlines Flight 585, Boeing 737-200, N999UA, 4 Miles South of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado, Springs, Colorado, March 3, 1991. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-01/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This amended report explains the accident involving United Airlines flight 585, a Boeing 737-200, which entered an uncontrolled descent and impacted terrain 4 miles south of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport, Colorado Springs, Colorado, on March 3, 1991. Safety issues discussed in the report are the potential meterological hazards to airplanes in the area of Colorado Springs; 737 rudder malfunctions, including rudder reversals; and the design of the main rudder power control unit servo valve. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Size and Urban Growth
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Sheard, Nicholas Conference Paper Airport size and urban growth 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Sheard, Nicholas (2015) : Airport size and urban growth, 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places", 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124561 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Airport Size and Urban Growth* Nicholas Sheard† September 2015 Abstract This paper estimates the effects of airports on economic growth in US metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures and Enplaned
    TABLE 1. Summary of Aircraft Departures and Enplaned Passengers, Freight, and Mail by Carrier Group, Air Carrier, and Type of Service: 1999 ( Major carriers ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aircraft Departures Enplaned revenue-tones Carrier Group Service Total Enplaned by air carrier performed Scheduled passengers Freight Mail -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. Scheduled 161825 166184 12838541 68645.64 20511.47 Nonscheduled 303 0 15787 59.00 0.00 All services 162128 166184 12854328 68704.64 20511.47 AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC. Scheduled 206876 211734 18480488 35934.41 42366.62 Nonscheduled 572 0 12189 0.00 0.00 All services 207448 211734 18492677 35934.41 42366.62 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. Scheduled 727457 758229 72588378 347221.50 203296.26 Nonscheduled 12256 0 35082 0.00 0.00 All services 739713 758229 72623460 347221.50 203296.26 CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC. Scheduled 420916 427963 40011608 151029.37 120088.36 Nonscheduled 6932 0 47011 0.00 0.00 All services 427848 427963 40058619 151029.37 120088.36 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. Scheduled 925925 941409 101789155 407395.97 354773.43 Nonscheduled 3852 0 79403 0.00 0.00 All services 929777 941409 101868558 407395.97 354773.43 DHL AIRWAYS Scheduled 64576 75168 0 289438.54 4973.72 Nonscheduled 655 0 0 8005.52 2387.06 All services 65231 75168 0 297444.06 7360.78 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION Scheduled 276609 276609 0 4270622.55 9787.12 Nonscheduled 1748 0 0 3444.83 0.00 All services 278357 276609 0 4274067.38 9787.12 NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. Scheduled 551641 537748 50412682 228507.90 196434.93 Nonscheduled 468 0 70273 0.00 0.00 All services 552109 537748 50482955 228507.90 196434.93 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Improvements and Urban Growth Nicholas Sheard
    Airport Improvements and Urban Growth Nicholas Sheard To cite this version: Nicholas Sheard. Airport Improvements and Urban Growth. 2015. halshs-01117913 HAL Id: halshs-01117913 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01117913 Preprint submitted on 18 Feb 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Working Papers / Documents de travail Airport Improvements and Urban Growth Nicholas Sheard WP 2015 - Nr 09 Airport Improvements and Urban Growth∗ Nicholas Sheard† February 2015 Abstract This paper estimates the effects of airports on economic growth in the local areas they serve, using data from US metropolitan areas. It applies a novel identification technique that uses the overall development of the air transport network to identify changes in airport size that are not influenced by local factors. Airport size is found to have positive effects on local employment with an elasticity of 0.02 and on GDP with an elasticity of 0.035. This means that for every job created at the airport by an exogenous increase in traffic, there are three jobs created outside of the airport. Airport size is also found to have positive effects on local wages and on the number of firms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010
    THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by MASSACHUSETTS INSTME OF TECHNOLOGY ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ UL02 1 B.S., Aerospace Engineering University of Notre Dame (2008) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 0 2012 Alexander Andrew Wulz. All rights reserved. .The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ..................................................................... .. ...................... Department of Aeronautr and Astronautics n n May 11, 2012 Certified by ............................................................................ Peter P. Belobaba Principle Research Scientist of Aeronautics and Astronautics / Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ................................................................... Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 11, 2012 in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ABSTRACT The main objective of this thesis is to explore the evolution of U.S. commercial domestic aircraft operations from 1991 to 2010 and describe the implications for future U.S. commercial domestic fleets. Using data collected from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, we analyze 110 different aircraft types from 145 airlines operating U.S. commercial domestic service between 1991 and 2010. We classify the aircraft analyzed into four categories: turboprop, regional jet, narrow-body, and wide-body.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999 No. 133 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was SCHEDULE If Congress does not reauthorize the called to order by the President pro Mr. MCCAIN. Mr. President, today Airport Improvement Program (AIP), tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. the Senate will resume consideration the Federal Aviation Administration of the pending amendments to the FAA (FAA) will be prohibited from issuing PRAYER bill. Senators should be aware that much needed grants to airports in every state, regardless of whether or The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John rollcall votes are possible today prior not funds have been appropriated. We Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: to the 12:30 recess in an attempt to have now entered fiscal year 2000, and Lord of all life, our prayer is like complete action on the bill by the end we cannot put off reauthorization of breathing. We breathe in Your Spirit of the day. As a reminder, first-degree the AIP. The program lapsed as of last and breathe out praise to You. Help us amendments to the bill must be filed to take a deep breath of Your love, Friday. Every day that goes by without by 10 a.m. today. As a further re- an AIP authorization is another day peace, and joy so that we will be re- minder, debate on three judicial nomi- freshed and ready for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Rudder Control, Boeing 737-201, June 9, 1996
    Loss of rudder control, Boeing 737-201, June 9, 1996 Micro-summary: This Boeing 737-201 experienced a loss of rudder control on approach. Event Date: 1996-06-09 at 2200 EDT Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems,
    [Show full text]