DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Policies to Address Air Pollution from Road Transport in Cities and Improve Health: Insights from Country Experiences and Lessons for Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Policies to Address Air Pollution from Road Transport in Cities and Improve Health: Insights from Country Experiences and Lessons for Indonesia Fiscal policies to address air pollution from road transport in cities and improve health: Insights from country experiences and lessons for Indonesia Working Paper December 2019 r 2019 Cover photo credits: Arran Smith as published on Unsplash ________________________________________ Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme, 2019 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. 2 Acknowledgements This study was undertaken in the context of a United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) project on Environment, Health and Pollution as well as a project on Enhancing Knowledge and Capacity for Inclusive Green Economies. This study was prepared by a team of researchers. Kai Schlegelmilch of Green Budget Germany was the overall lead for the study. Jacqueline Cottrell of Green Budget Germany led the development of policy recommendations and coordinated inputs of all authors. Anja Rosenberg of the Energy Community Secretariat was responsible for estimating the impacts of measures. Verena Streitferdt and Maya Virdayanti Anggraini of Pertiwi- Consulting, Aditya Mahalana an independent consultant in Indonesia, Budi Haryanto of the University of Indonesia, and Ahmad Safrudin of KPBB were responsible for analyzing data, delivering policy analysis, conducting interviews and stakeholder consultations. The study was led and carried out by Joy Kim, Senior Economic Affairs Officer at the Economy Division of UNEP, under the overall supervision of Steven Stone, Chief of the Resources and Markets Branch of the Economy Division of UNEP. Administrative support was provided by Rahila Somra, Fatma Pandey and Desiree Leon. The authors gratefully acknowledge the insightful comments and contribution of experts and participants at a stakeholder workshop including: Dr Adi Budiarso, Eka Hendra Permana and Angustin Samosir from the Fiscal Policy Office, Ministry of Finance of Indonesia (BKF); Ms Fitri, Mr Agung, Ms Ambar and Sri Mulyati from the Environmental Protection Agency of DKI Jakarta Province; Barlev Nico Marhehe from UNEP; Ririn Kusuma from the Vital Strategies Programme; Mega Kunue from the International Council on Clean transportation (ICCT); Stkvura Azurar and Dr Ir. Sylvira Ananda Azwar from the Indonesian Environmental Scientists Association; and Mr Yuniar from the Transport Agency of Jakarta Special Region. In addition, the authors would like to thank KPBB for providing their facilities for meetings and the stakeholder workshop. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of UNEP reviewers for their invaluable comments and support to the development of the study including Sirini Withana, Bert Fabian, Barlev Nico Marhehe, Maria Katherina Patdu, Teodora Cakarmis and Himanshu Sharma. The layout and design of the report and the bibliography was prepared by Rouven Stubbe of Green Budget Germany. The study was undertaken in the context of a UNEP-led project on Environment, Health and Pollution which seeks to provide the needed understanding, capacities and tools to help countries and stakeholders take effective action to address pollution. As part of this project, a series of studies have been carried out which explore the effective use of fiscal policies for pollution reduction. These fiscal studies contribute to the Implementation Plan ‘Towards a pollution-free planet’ adopted at the Third UN Environment Assembly (UNEA-3) which identifies stimulating good practices through fiscal policy as an accelerator for implementation. 3 Table of Contents List of figures ................................................................................................................................... 8 List of tables..................................................................................................................................... 9 List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 13 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 20 1.1. Background ......................................................................................................................... 20 1.2. The role of green fiscal policy in achieving emissions reductions from the transport sector ................................................................................................................................................... 23 1.3. Indonesia and DKI Jakarta as a case study to investigate opportunities for fiscal policy measures to curb air pollution .................................................................................................. 24 1.3.1. Regulatory framework for air pollution ................................................................... 24 1.3.2. Fiscal situation ......................................................................................................... 25 1.3.3. Growing public awareness ....................................................................................... 25 1.4. Objectives of the study .................................................................................................. 26 1.5. Methodology ................................................................................................................. 27 1.6. Structure ........................................................................................................................ 27 2. Key Trends, Costs and Challenges of Air Pollution ................................................................ 29 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 29 2.1.1. Air pollution ................................................................................................................. 29 2.1.2. Air pollutant monitoring in Indonesia ......................................................................... 30 Air pollutant monitoring stations in Indonesia .............................................................. 30 2.1.3. Publicly available data ................................................................................................. 30 2.1.4. Overview of data used for the review ......................................................................... 32 The GAINS Model ................................................................................................................... 32 Monitoring Stations in DKI Jakarta ........................................................................................ 33 2.2. Air pollutants in Indonesia .................................................................................................. 35 2.3. Overview of air pollution in DKI Jakarta ............................................................................. 37 2.4. Costs of air pollution .......................................................................................................... 41 2.4.1. Explanation of health impacts attributable to the pollutants ..................................... 41 2.4.2. Bottom up health cost assessment in Jakarta ............................................................. 43 2.4.3 Sources of air pollution and hotspots .......................................................................... 47 2.5. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 50 4 3. Analysis of policy framework for air pollution ...................................................................... 52 3.1. Existing and planned policies to address air pollution from transport in Indonesia and Jakarta ....................................................................................................................................... 52 3.1.1. Regulations in Indonesia ............................................................................................. 52 3.1.2. Regulations in DKI Jakarta ....................................................................................... 60 3.1.3. Summary of the regulatory overview .......................................................................... 63 3.2. Recommendations and reflections on the existing policy framework ............................... 64 3.2.1. Updating standards across different government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improving the Tax System in Indonesia
    OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 998 Improving the Tax System Jens Matthias Arnold in Indonesia https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k912j3r2qmr-en Unclassified ECO/WKP(2012)75 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 30-Oct-2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT Unclassified ECO/WKP(2012)75 IMPROVING THE TAX SYSTEM IN INDONESIA ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPERS No. 998 By Jens Arnold All OECD Economics Department Working Papers are available through OECD's Internet website at http://www.oecd.org/eco/Workingpapers English - Or. English JT03329829 Complete document available on OLIS in its original format This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ECO/WKP(2012)75 ABSTRACT/RESUME Improving the tax system in Indonesia Indonesia has come a long way in improving its tax system over the last decade, both in terms of revenues raised and administrative efficiency. Nonetheless, the tax take is still low, given the need for more spending on infrastructure and social protection. With the exception of the natural resources sector, increasing tax revenues would be best achieved through broadening tax bases and improving tax administration, rather than changes in the tax schedule that seems broadly in line with international practice. Possible measures to broaden the tax base include bringing more of the self-employed into the tax system, subjecting employer-provided fringe benefits and allowances to personal income taxation and reducing the exemptions from value-added taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of 37Th Conference of the ASEAN Federation of Engineering and 26Th Young Engineers of ASEAN Federation of Engineering Organisation Conference
    Submission to the HKIE Executive HKIE-YMC Report of the 37th CAFEO & 26th YEAFEO Conference Dec 2019 Submission to the HKIE Executive Report of 37th Conference of the ASEAN Federation of Engineering and 26th Young Engineers of ASEAN Federation of Engineering Organisation Conference 10 - 13 September 2019 Jakarta The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Young Members Committee Submission to HKIE Executive HKIE-YMC Report of the 37th CAFEO & 26th YEAFEO Conference Dec 2019 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 3 2. YEAFEO Meeting ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Country Report ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 YEAFEO Governing Board Meeting ................................................................. 5 3. Sustainability Forum ................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Energy ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 LinkAja ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skripsi Yunda
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Overview of Research Object 1.1.1 Light Rail Transit Figure 1.1 LRT Source : www.kabar3.com The Palembang Light Rail Transit (Palembang LRT) is an operational light rail transit system in Palembang, Indonesia which connects Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II International Airport and Jakabaring Sports City. Starting construction in 2015, the project was built to facilitate the 2018 Asian Games and was completed in mid-2018, just a few months before the event. Costing Rp 10.9 trillion for construction, the system is the first operational light rail transit system in Indonesia, and utilizes trains made by local manufacturer PT.INKA. The system's only line has a total of 13 stations (6 operational). As Palembang was to host the 2018 Asian Games, the project was pushed to be completed before the event began. Groundbreaking for the project occurred on 1 November 2015, with state-owned company Waskita Karya being appointed as the primary contractor following the issuance of Presidential Regulation 116 of 2015 on Acceleration of Railway Train Operation in South Sumatera Province. The contract, which was signed in February 2017, was initially valued at Rp 12.5 trillion. Construction was scheduled for completion in February 2018, with commercial service beginning in May 2018. However, the completion date was moved to June 2018 with operations beginning in July, only one month before the Asian Games. A test run was done on 22 May 2018 and was inaugurated by President Joko Widodo on 15 July 2018. Operations for the LRT started on 1 August, several days before the Jakarta LRT began running, making it the first operational LRT system in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Related Parties Transactions As Tax Avoidance Strategy in Indonesia: the Role of Corporate Governance
    Foreign Related Parties Transactions as Tax Avoidance Strategy in Indonesia: The Role of Corporate Governance Nuritomo1, Sidharta Utama2 and Ancella A Hermawan2 1Department of Accounting, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Jl. Babarsari No 43, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia 2Department of Accounting, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus FEB UI Depok, 16424, Indonesia Keywords: tax avoidance, tax expenses, related party transaction, marginal tax rate, corporate governance. Abstract: This study researches on tax avoidance practice through foreign related party transaction and the effect of corporate governance on the relationship between the shareholder's tax expenses and foreign related party transaction. Different from other studies that use related party transaction entirely, this study uses a foreign related party transaction. Related party transaction will be beneficial only if it is done on the company with different tax rate. If it is done in Indonesia that has a flat income tax rate, foreign related party transaction can be used to avoid tax. Using data from 301 listed companies in Indonesia, this study finds that tax avoidance in Indonesia is undertaken by increasing foreign related party transaction. The use of foreign related party transaction can tell more about tax avoidance strategy compared to related party transaction in totally. The related party transaction to a country with a lower tax rate can be one of tax avoidance strategy in Indonesia to get a tax benefit. This study also finds that the corporate governance can weaken the effect of the shareholder's tax expenses on the related party transaction meaning to lower the tax avoidance practice through the mechanism of related foreign party transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Failure in Jakarta Public Bus Transport
    Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT Doddy Hendra Wijaya SERVICE FAILURE IN JAKARTA PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT Service Science Project Report Date/Term: Spring 2009 Supervisors: Bo Enquist Samuel Petros Sebhatu Karlstads Universitets 651 88 Karlstad Tfn 054-700 10 00 Fax 054-700 14 60 [email protected] www.kau.se 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Populations in most developing countries are increasing much faster than car ownership levels and therefore an increasing proportion of the population is dependent on public transport except for very short journeys. In most countries, walking is the most common mode of travel for distances of up to one or two kilometers in urban areas and much further in rural areas. Those who own bicycles tend to use them for journeys of up to about eight kilometers, beyond which public transport is preferred mode. Public transport also provides an alternative to those who have private transport, but are sometimes deterred from using it by traffic congestion, parking difficulties or problems in accessing certain streets, although in practice it is relatively unusual, particularly in developing countries, for car owners to use public transport to any significant extent. However, in many developing countries families tend to be large, so that even if these is a car belonging to a household, most members of the family are still likely to use public transport for at least some of their travel (Iles 2005) Public transport is therefore vital for the vast majority without access to private transport. There is need for personal mobility, in particular for access to employment opportunities, but with low income levels affordability is a common problem, while the services provided are often regarded as inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Window Into Indonesia (IWI)
    1 Investment Window into Indonesia (IWI) Welcome to Indonesia A. Introduction into Indonesia 2 1.General overview 3 2.Demography 4 3. Investment climate 6 4. Industry overview and opportunities 8 5.Regional snapshot 9 B. Identifying your investment Stage 12 C. Establishment of company:getting started 13 1.General investment policy 13 2.Forms of entity 14 3.Investment Procedures 16 4.Mergers and acquisitions 16 D. Taxation in Indonesia 18 1. Tax incentives 18 2. Tax administration 19 3. Business taxation 20 4. Taxes on individuals 32 5. Indirect taxes 34 6. Withholding taxes 37 E. Audit and compliance 38 1. Accounting period 38 2. Currency 38 3. Language, accounting basis and standards 38 4. Audit Requirements 38 5. Independence 39 F. Labour environment 40 1. Employee rights and remuneration 40 2. Wages and benefits 40 3. Termination of employment 41 4. Labour-management relations 41 5. Employment of foreigners 41 About Deloitte 42 Contacts 44 Investment Window into Indonesia (IWI) | Foreword Foreword Selamat datang di Indonesia! Since the silk road era, Indonesia have thrived to be one of the most prominent trading countries. Indonesia also strategically lies within two oceans (Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean) and two continents (Asia and Australia) to make this nation rich for its natural resources. The current Indonesian government recognizes the fact that it is essen- tial to efficiently utilize our natural resources by generating new invest- Claudia Lauw Lie Hoeng ments. Several measures have been taken to ensure investment con- Deloitte Indonesia Country tinues to come. Business licensing applications between ministries are Leader being expedited, synchronized, and integrated into an Electronic Single Submission System (OSS).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Online Motorcycle Taxi Performance in Surabaya And
    Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS) Evaluation of Online Motorcycle Taxi Performance in Surabaya and Sidoarjo Area, Indonesia Wicaksono, Achmad 1,a, Harnen Sulistio 1, b, Alan Wahyudi Wardani 1 and Dwa Aulia Bramiana 1 1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 65145, Indonesia a<[email protected]>, b<[email protected]> Keywords:Online motorcycle taxi, GO-JEK, Importance Performance Analysis, Stated Preference Analysis, Indonesia Abstract. Surabaya is the second biggest city in Indonesia, and Sidoarjo is a regency close to Surabaya, where many people live in but they work in Surabaya. More and more citizen of Surabaya and Sidoarjo use motorcycle taxi, either conventional service or online service so call as “ojek”, operated by the company called as GO-JEK. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the performance of GO-JEK in Surabaya and Sidoarjo based on user point-of-view and to observe what factors that influence the users in selecting either conventional or on-line ojek. The methods used are the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and the Stated Preference Technique. The IPA shows that there are 3 factors that have to be improved: firstly, driving manner, secondly, attention to maximum capacity and thirdly, helmet for the passenger. The Stated Preference Analysis shows that there are two major factors affecting the choice whether GO-JEK or conventional ojek, these are trip cost and waiting time to pick up by the ojek. 1. Introduction Surabaya is the second biggest City in Indonesia, with the population of 2.5 million. Sidoarjo is a regency that has a borderline with Surabaya, where many people live in but they work in Surabaya.
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP Mid-Term Evaluation
    Final Mid-term Evaluation Report on UNEP/GEF project GF/4010-07-01 (4960) Bus Rapid Transit and Pedestrian Improvements in Jakarta Typical TransJakarta Halte Evaluation Team David Antell, Transport Expert and Lead Consultant Owen Podger, Institutional Expert Evaluation Office August 2010 Page i Acknowledgments The evaluation team conducted many interviews, attended meetings, and met many employees of the busway. The main interviewees are recorded in Annex 8, but the names of many supporting staff and employees are not given. To all those who provided inputs to us in an atmosphere of genuine cooperation, we extend our sincere gratitude. Without them all it would have been impossible to present this report based on rich and detailed information. Page ii Contents Acronyms v 1 Executive Summary 1 1.1 The Project ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Mid-term Evaluation .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Introduction and Background 6 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report
    10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao PDR Intergovernmental Tenth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia 2030 Road Map for Sustainable Transport ~Aligning with Sustainable Transport Development Goals (SDGs)~ Country Report (Draft) <Indonesia> ------------------------------------- This country report was prepared by the Government of Indonesia as an input for the Tenth Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. 10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao-PDR Country EST Report (covering from Nepal EST Forum a) Name of the Country : INDONESIA 2015 to Lao EST Forum 2017) b) Name, Designation and Line Ministry/Agency Respondent: Muiz Thohir, Deputy Director of Programme Evaluation, Greater Jakarta Transport Authority, Ministry of Transportation c) List other Line Ministries/Agencies contributing to preparation of the Country Report: Ministry of Foresty and Environmental d) Reporting period: 2015-2017 With the objective of demonstrating the renewed interest and commitment of Asian countries towards realizing a promising decade (2010-2020) of sustainable actions and measures for achieving safe, secure, affordable, efficient, and people and environment-friendly transport in rapidly urbanizing Asia, the participating countries of the Fifth Regional EST Forum in Asia discussed and agreed on a goodwill and voluntary declaration - “Bangkok Declaration for 2020 – Sustainable Transport Goals for 2010-2020.” At the Seventh Regional EST Forum held in Bali in 2013, the participating countries adopted the “Bali Declaration on Vision Three Zeros- Zero Congestion, Zero Pollution and Zero Accidents towards Next Generation Transport Systems in Asia” reinforcing the implementation of Bangkok 2020 Declaration (2010-2020) with emphasis to zero tolerance towards congestion, pollution and road accidents in the transport policy, planning and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Estate and Inheritance Tax Guide
    Worldwide Estate and Inheritance Tax Guide 2021 Preface he Worldwide Estate and Inheritance trusts and foundations, settlements, Tax Guide 2021 (WEITG) is succession, statutory and forced heirship, published by the EY Private Client matrimonial regimes, testamentary Services network, which comprises documents and intestacy rules, and estate Tprofessionals from EY member tax treaty partners. The “Inheritance and firms. gift taxes at a glance” table on page 490 The 2021 edition summarizes the gift, highlights inheritance and gift taxes in all estate and inheritance tax systems 44 jurisdictions and territories. and describes wealth transfer planning For the reader’s reference, the names and considerations in 44 jurisdictions and symbols of the foreign currencies that are territories. It is relevant to the owners of mentioned in the guide are listed at the end family businesses and private companies, of the publication. managers of private capital enterprises, This publication should not be regarded executives of multinational companies and as offering a complete explanation of the other entrepreneurial and internationally tax matters referred to and is subject to mobile high-net-worth individuals. changes in the law and other applicable The content is based on information current rules. Local publications of a more detailed as of February 2021, unless otherwise nature are frequently available. Readers indicated in the text of the chapter. are advised to consult their local EY professionals for further information. Tax information The WEITG is published alongside three The chapters in the WEITG provide companion guides on broad-based taxes: information on the taxation of the the Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide, the accumulation and transfer of wealth (e.g., Worldwide Personal Tax and Immigration by gift, trust, bequest or inheritance) in Guide and the Worldwide VAT, GST and each jurisdiction, including sections on Sales Tax Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakarta's Bus Rapid Transit System Indonesia
    Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit System CASE STUDY Indonesia | March 2016 "Transport in Asia and the Pacific faces a web of issues that need a strategic solution... Countries across the region have to contend with road safety, air pollution, social sustainability, climate change impacts, lack of public financing, decrepit infrastructure, and even cross-border bottlenecks, among others.” - James Leather, Co-Chair, ADB Transport Community of Practice Hoping to improve the worsening traffic situation in Jakarta, Sutiyoso—then Governor of Jakarta—bit the bullet and pushed for the construction of the Jakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in 2001. With worsening traffic congestion and growing population of 8 million in 2000, BRT was thought as the ultimate solution to the traffic woes of people in the capital of Indonesia. The BRT masterplan is projected to have a busway network consisting of eleven corridors. The system is a closed trunk system without a functioning feeder system. The first corridor of Jakarta’s BRT of around 12.9 km, essentially consisting of a dedicated lane and loading platforms for large buses in the inner side of city streets, began operations in early 2004. Initially, the system ran well and showed good results—patrons’ travel time was reduced by an average of 20 minutes through a clean and convenient transport system that had longer operating hours. Pre-launch objections from affected bus operators and the driving public had disappeared. However, problems on the operational and managerial aspects of the project began to crop up a few months after the BRT was launched. Months after the BRT launch, Governor Sutiyoso—then governor of Jakarta—listened intently at the problems presented by the various stakeholders of Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTOR DIGEST Equity Research | 27 April 2020
    INVESTOR DIGEST Equity Research | 27 April 2020 Economic Data HIGHLIGHT Latest 2020F Adhi Karya: Management Conference Call Takeaways (ADHI; Rp535; Neutral; TP: 7-DRRR (%), eop 4.50 4.50 Rp1,120) Inflation (YoY %) 2.96 3.30 Alam Sutera Realty 4Q19: Above Expectations (ASRI; Rp112; Neutral; TP: Rp310) US$ 1 = Rp, period avg 15,563 14,257 MNC Group 4Q19 Results: Ahead of Expectations (MNCN; Rp895; Buy; TP: Rp2,200) United Tractors: Mar-20 Operational Number (UNTR; Rp16,225; Buy; TP: Rp22,500) Market Recap April 24th 2020; JCI 4,496.06 Points -97.49 pts (-2.12%); Valued $317mn; Stock Market Data (24 April 2020) Mkt Cap $329bn; USD/IDR 15,563 JCI Index 4,496.1 -2.12% Trading T/O ( Rp bn ) 4,980.8 CORPORATE Market Cap ( Rp tn ) 5,198.7 Adhi Karya: Management Conference Call Takeaways (ADHI; Rp535; Neutral; TP: Rp1,120) Market Data Summary* We hosted a conference call with ADHI’s CFO, Entus Asnawi, and IR team. The company revealed a new guidance of 20% decline in new 2020F 2021F contracts/revenues/earnings, 1-34% higher than previously guided, as they believe construction progress and on-going tenders are better than estimated. P/E (x) 11.9 10.7 Further, the Greater Jakarta LRT project got an addendum from Rp22.8tn to P/BV (x) 1.7 1.6 Rp23.3tn. Herewith the conference call takeaways: EV/EBITDA (x) 10.4 9.7 Div. Yield (%) 4.0 4.1 New guidance from the company. The company revealed its latest guidance of Net Gearing (%) 23.2 20.9 ca.20% decline in new contracts/revenues/earnings in 2020, 1-34% higher ROE (%) 14.4 15.2 compared to previous guidance.
    [Show full text]