AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.19 2Nd QUARTER 2008 (April to June)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.19 2Nd QUARTER 2008 (April to June) Freight-jumbos in action with a help of Rolls-Royce, Pratt and Whitney and General Electric. AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.19 2nd QUARTER 2008 (April to June) 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................2 2. HIGHLIGHTS AND KEY DEVELOPMENTS.........................................................................3 2.1 REGULATORY.........................................................................................................................3 2.2 AIRLINES................................................................................................................................4 2.3 AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................12 2.4 SAFETY AND SECURITY ........................................................................................................16 2.5 ATM....................................................................................................................................17 2.6 MANUFACTURERS ................................................................................................................18 2.7 THE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................................................................................20 3. AIR CARGO ...............................................................................................................................21 3.1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................21 3.2 AIR CARGO TRAFFIC .............................................................................................................21 3.3 AIR CARGO OPERATORS........................................................................................................25 3.4 REGULATORY TRENDS..........................................................................................................27 3.5 CARGO FINANCIAL RESULTS.................................................................................................28 3.6 AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................29 3.7 AIRCRAFT.............................................................................................................................30 Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.52077. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Transport and Energy DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG Energy and Transport - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/contact/index_en.htm) Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q2 2008 for DG TREN 1 1 Overview Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, India, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mexico, Niger, Senegal, and Togo were added to the list of states with horizontal air transport agreements with the EU. These agreements remove nationality restrictions in each country’s bilateral air services agreements with EU states. The European network of air services continued to expand, although the rate of expansion slowed from that seen between the second quarters of 2006 and 2007. Over the two years from 2006, the number of cross-border routes served increased by one-quarter, and domestic routes by around 10%. However, between 2007 and 2008 the average weekly frequency of service on both domestic and cross-border routes fell. LCCs have been significant players in the creation of new routes, their reduced cost- base allowing them to enter point-to-point markets which would not be viable for network carriers, or full-service regionals. Ryanair alone was responsible for more than one in every five of the routes new to the international network in 2008. A result of this increased activity in thin markets is the increasing number of routes operated by a single carrier. Of the 727 airport-pairs with new air services in 2008, only nineteen attracted more than one airline. AEA airlines reported total passenger numbers up by 1.6% in the three months to the end of June 2008. Increases in traffic did not match changes in capacity provided by many of the association’s member airlines, resulting in a deterioration in average load factors relative to the previous year’s second quarter. Overall, AEA load-factors were down by 1.8 points, reflecting the 4% increase in capacity against a growth in RPK of 1.6 percent. Growth in terms of passenger numbers was strong between Europe and the Middle East (up 10.9%), but disappointing on the North Atlantic, where a 2.5% increase in capacity was combined with slightly decreasing passenger numbers. Among the largest European carriers, Lufthansa, Air France and British Airways were the top performers in terms of RPK. EU network carrier operating results for the latest quarter were mixed. While both British Airways and Lufthansa improved their results, Air France-KLM, Iberia and SAS Group moved from profit to loss. Alitalia’s operating loss deteriorated by USD73m, and Austrian’s loss also increased. Among LCC, while Ryanair posted positive results, Air Berlin, SkyEurope and Vueling all generated operating losses for the quarter. March 2008 saw ACI’s European airports year-on-year passenger throughput up over five percent, above the 4.2% increase recorded by the association’s world-wide airports. Among the world’s very largest airports, there were some significant falls in traffic, particularly in the USA where recession has hit the domestic market. Among European majors, London Heathrow recorded a very small drop in passenger throughput, driven by weakness in its domestic services. Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q2 2008 for DG TREN 2 2. Highlights and key developments 2.1 Regulatory In April, the Commission adopted a Communication [COM (2008) 227] on the application of the slot allocation Regulation, clarifying a number of issues with a view to ensuring better implementation of existing rules and improving the use of scarce capacity at congested Community airports. A key change in policy is the acceptance of the “secondary trading” of slots between air carriers. The rules with respect to the independence of slot co-ordinators, new entry and the exchanging of slots are explained, and the need for better cooperation between slot co-ordinators emphasised. In April, the Commission initialled a “horizontal” agreement with India removing nationality restrictions in the bilateral air services agreements with twenty-six EU Member States. In May, the Commission initialled a “horizontal” agreement with the eight Member States of the Economic and Monetary Union of Western Africa (UEMOA: Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo). The agreement brings several provisions in the 47 bilateral air services agreements between EU and UMEOA Member States into conformity with EU law. Also in May, the Commission initialled a “horizontal” agreement with Mexico removing nationality restrictions in the bilateral air services agreements with twelve EU Member States. The agreement with Mexico is the thirty-seventh “horizontal” agreement to have been negotiated by the Commission, resulting in some 750 bilateral air services agreements with third countries now having been brought into conformity with EU law. In June, the Transport Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with Australia and New Zealand on comprehensive air transport agreements. Both countries have already signed “horizontal” agreements with the EU. In June, following complaints from a competing carrier and an association of airlines, the Commission launched an investigation into public financing received by Frankfurt Hahn airport from the Hessen and Rheinland-Pfalz regional authorities, and from its publicly owned parent company, Fraport AG. The Commission has also decided to scrutinise the airport charges applicable at Frankfurt Hahn, as well as the individual contracts the airport has concluded with Ryanair. In June, the Commission approved assistance of €84 million for the construction of a new airport at Lublin in Poland from local and national government and the European Regional Development Fund. It also gave its approval to public funding of €1.7 million for upgrading aircraft parking stands and taxiways at Gdansk airport. In April, the Commission decided not to raise any objections to the public financing of infrastructure development at Lodz airport. In May, the Commission withdrew its intention to set legal limits across Europe on the size of carry-on cabin baggage (EC Regulation 358/2008). In April, the Commission adopted its seventh update of the blacklist of air carriers banned from EU airspace. Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q2 2008 for DG TREN 3 2.2 Airlines 2.2.1
Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Practices for Commercial Operators
    OPERATIONS IN AIRSPACE CLASS E IN GERMANY BELOW FL100 RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATORS The following best practices have been developed by flight safety officers and experts to enhance the safety of operations in airspace Class E below FL100 to prevent collisions between controlled and uncontrolled aircraft in a mixed traffic environment. Recommendations for training departments and pilots • IMPROVE AIRSPACE AWARENESS Train pilots to be aware of shortfalls in the existing airspace structure – annual training and NOT only by bulletin using two components: o Generic briefing on airspace Class E in Germany o Dedicated airport briefing documents o Include risk and threats in unprotected airspace in individual departure and arrival briefing • OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS o FLY DEFENSIVELY! o Maintain Minimum Clean Airspeed or as slow as reasonable o Request to use protected airspace – minimise time in airspace Class E and refuse shortcuts if necessary. Most standard departures and approaches/transitions will facilitate this. o Descend according to airspace structure on arrival. Steep/expedited climb through airspace Class E on departure. o Consider airspace structure for engine out procedures o Consider delaying take-off if conflict with other aircraft is anticipated • USE OF AUTOMATION IN AIRSPACE CLASS ECHO o Minimise visual approaches – they require additional attention and increase flight time in unprotected airspace o Maximise lookout capacity through use of automation (FMS/task sharing) • SEE AND AVOID o Maximise lookout
    [Show full text]
  • Global Leaders in Innovative Full Service Airline Training
    Global Leaders in Innovative Full Service Airline Training committed to excellence Welcome At CTC we are proud of the reputation that we have built over time as worldwide providers of innovative training solutions. This reputation is founded on the delivery of our core values: expertise, quality, innovation and flexibility. With our state-of-the-art Crew Training Centres across the globe and specialist training personnel, we are able to provide our client airlines with every element of airline crew training. We offer a wide range of training options from basic CPL/IR licence through to Type Rating on the most popular commercial aircraft today including Boeing and Airbus, and onwards to training airline instructors and examiners. From crew selection through to crew supply and from CRM courses to Command Training, CTC can deliver all your needs; we are truly a ‘full service’ airline training specialist. To do this we enjoy comprehensive Joint Aviation Authority approvals as a Type-Rating Training Organisation and Flight Training Organisation and we have received approvals from many other regulatory authorities around the world. Equally as important, we enjoy the trust and loyalty of many of the world’s leading airlines – whether it be for the supply of a standalone training course, or for the outsourcing of all of their crew training needs. These factors make CTC your first choice partner to provide specialist aviation training and support – worldwide – for all your aircrew requirements. We look forward to being of service to you. Captain Chris Clarke Group Chairman CTC Aviation Group plc 1 WELCOME ‘CTC has supported us throughout our growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary´S News Prague News Programs and Events In
    Mary’s Website | Accommodation in Prague | Activities in Prague | Out of Prague SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2009 Dear Clients, MARY´S SPECIAL OFFERS FOR APARTMENTS Welcome to the regular issue of Mary's Travel Agency Newsletter which serves as quick overview of Prague's and more importantly Mary's' current and upcoming events, special offers, tours, tips for accommodation and other news, you would not want to miss. Take a look around and find BALBINOVA 4.01 APARTMENT easily, conveniently and effectively information that interests you the most. Brand new Thank you for using our services, apartment!!! Mary's Travel Agency Location : Right in the center of the MARY´S NEWS c... SPEND THE CHRISTMAS AND NEW YEARS EVE IN THE MAGIC PRAGUE apartment ~ 63 EUR Prague is a wonderful city for the celebration of Christmas and New Year's Eve. At this time of the year the always magnificent Prague becomes even more a fairytale. Therefore more than 100 000 NA SMETANCE V APARTMENT people come here every year to celebrate New Year's Eve. You will not forget the walks down narrow streets, mulled wine and performances on the Old Town Square for sure. Location : Tranquil If you are looking for the unforgettable experience in the very heart of Europe, then you are area of Vinohrady welcome to Prague. (Prague 2), across For our clients we have prepared a wide range of Christmas and New Year programs: traditional from the park Czech dinners in the most popular Prague restaurants U Vejvodu, New Town Brewery, U Fleku, Riegrovy sady, just Svejk's restaurant U Kalicha, folklore show in the Folklore Garden restaurant, New Year's Eve 5 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Exchange Networklk Planni Ng C Onf Erence
    ACO/CI EUROPE / anna.aero Airport Exchange Networklk Planni ng C onf erence Introduction Barcelona - 24 November 2009 Ralph Anker Editor anna.aero [email protected] 1 1 Introductory overview • Demand trends in Europe • Winter 2009 indicators • Economic factors • Trends in European route development • Mixed fortunes for Europe’s airports • Conclusions 2 2 Traffic trends – AEA airlines 3 3 Traffic trends – AEA airlines 4 4 Traffic trends – AEA airlines 5 5 Traffic trends – AEA airlines • In 2009 (Jan-Sep) AEA airlines reported: – ASKs fell by 4.3% – RPKs fell by 5.5% – Passenger numbers fell by 7.2% – Average load factor fell by 1.0 percentage points to 75. 8% • Quote from Secretary General (17 Nov 09): “The foundations for a sustainable European air transport sector are crumbling. Portions of our industry are close to collapse. Some network airlines are ceasing to exist as independent entities. Others are exiting markets that they will not rere--enter.enter. Secondary markets are losing service. Tens of thousands of people employed by or sustained by the airlines are losing their jobs.” 6 6 LCCs are not AEA members • Apart from AEA airlines Europe is blessed with some major nonnon--AEAAEA airlines – LCCs such as bmibaby, easyJet, germanwings, Norwegian, Ryanair, Vueling, Wizz Air – Assorted charter/hybrid carriers such as Aer Lingus, airberlin, Pegasus, Transavia. com, TUIfly.com – Regional carriers such as airBaltic,,y, Flybe, Meridiana and WiderWiderøøee 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 Airline failures • Europe has (so far) lost only a handful
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport Activity
    Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World 10-12 November 2008, Guadalajara, Mexico The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport A ctivity Past trends and future perspectives Ken Button, School of George Mason University, USA NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT This paper was prepared by Prof. Ken Button of School of George Mason University, USA, as a contribution to the OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World that will be held 10-12 November 2008 in Guadalajara, Mexico. The paper discusses the impacts of increased globalisation on international air traffic activity – past trends and future perspectives. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ............................................................................................................. 2 THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ACTIVITY - PAST TRENDS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Globalization and internationalization .................................................................................................. 5 3. The Basic Features of International Air Transportation ....................................................................... 6 3.1 Historical perspective .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analýza Spádové Oblasti a Projekt Rozvoje Linek Z Letiště Leoše Janáčka V Ostravě
    Analýza spádové oblasti a projekt rozvoje linek z letiště Leoše Janáčka v Ostravě Bc. Martina Eliášová Diplomová práce 2012 ABSTRAKT Předkládaná diplomová práce prezentuje čtenáři projekt, jehoţ cílem je návrh na vytvoření nové pravidelné letecké linky z mezinárodního letiště Leoše Janáčka v Ostravě. V teoretic- ké části jsou shrnuty poznatky získané studiem odborné literatury zabývající se leteckou dopravou, cestovním ruchem a analytickými metodami pouţitými v práci. Analytická část charakterizuje současný stav společnosti, podává stručný přehled o ekonomické situaci společnosti a srovnání s konkurenčními letišti. Dále je zde provedena SWOT analýza spo- lečnosti a analýza spádové oblasti letiště z pohledu incomingu a outgoingu. Na základě výsledkŧ analytické části je v projektové části vytvořen projekt na otevření pravidelné le- tecké linky do nové destinace. Klíčová slova: Letiště, incoming, outgoing, spádová oblast, letecký dopravce, nízkonákla- dová letecká společnost, destinace ABSTRACT This disertation presents a reader a project, which aim is to make a proposal of a newly created regular flight from the international Leos Janacek Airport in Ostrava. In the theore- tical section are sumarized knowledges obtained form literature focusing on air transpor- tation, tourism and analytical methods used in the thesis. Analytical part characterize cur- retnt company´s situation, shows general overview about economical company´s situation and draw a comparison with rival airports. After that is made a SWOT analysis and analy- sis of company´s catchment area, based on the wiev of incoming and outgoing. Based on the results of analytical part, there is created the project which deals with opening a regular flight to the new destination. Keywords: Airport, Incoming, Outgoing, Catchment Area, Air Carrier, Low Cost Airline, Destination Děkuji paní Ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Thesis Karan Shah Professor Banerjee Abstract: This Paper Studies the Factors Influencing the Profitability of European B
    Senior Thesis Karan Shah Professor Banerjee Abstract: This paper studies the factors influencing the profitability of European budget airlines through a detailed analysis of three airlines: Ryanair, EasyJet and SkyEurope. It begins by defining budget airlines and examining their origins in Europe. It then looks at previous studies that determine factors that influence the rate of return in aviation. It then undertakes a detailed analysis of the airlines‟ performance from 2000 to 2008. The study concludes by identifying the factors that influence profitability in this industry. They are giving employees stock options, discouraging unions, outsourcing or relocating jobs to country‟s with lower labor costs, fuel hedging, adopting more fuel-efficient aircrafts, outsourcing maintenance to countries with lower labor costs, improving management , a clear cut business strategy, a high load factor, the ability to generate ancillary revenue, size, scale and first mover advantage. Index 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 What are Budget Airlines 2 3.0 Origins of Budget Airlines 5 4.0 Profitability 7 5.0 Profitability of the European Budget Aviation Industry 9 6.0 Data Source 13 7.0 Data Analysis 13 7.1 Introduction 13 7.2 Profits 15 7.3 Revenue 17 7.4 Scheduled Revenue 19 7.5 Ancillary Revenue 25 7.6 Total Operating Expenses 27 7.7 Staff Costs 28 7.8 Fuel Costs 31 7.9 Miscellaneous Costs 33 8.0 Conclusion 34 9.0 Bibliography 38 1 1.0 Introduction Flying has traditionally been an activity for the elite. It was for important executives who believed that they were entitled to private lounges and champagne on board, and was an activity that most of the middle-class could only afford to undertake a few times a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Tracking Devices on Lufthansa Cargo Flights
    Utilization of tracking devices on Lufthansa Cargo flights. Guideline Use of tracking devices on Lufthansa Cargo Flights Lufthansa Cargo allows customers the use of their own tracking devices on most Lufthansa* flights (please consider the affected actual types mentioned in this document). You have now the ability to add tracking devices to your shipments and receive additional information at frequent intervals. This information will be in addition to current CiQ- (old C2K-) milestones. Which tracking devices can be used? Active tracking devices send live shipment data such as actual location (via GPS and GSM), temperature, humidity, shock or changes in luminosity. Data transmission is disabled in all devices during flight to conform to air safety regulations. The following tracking devices** are currently allowed for use on Lufthansa flights: • 7PSolutions GD100, GL200, GL 300, GL 300W • Imec tempmate S1 • Bosch Basic Sense Type T and S • Intelyt, iCHIME • Bosch, TDL 110 • Intelyt, iTAG •. CalAmp SC1102 & SC1004 • ITAG®3 Pro • Cargosense – Toshiba Environmental Logger • Kirsen Global Security A-Type „Schenker Smartbox“ • Cartasense U-Sensor • Moog Crossbow ILC2000*** • Controlant CO 10.01 Real-Time Logger • MSR 145, MSR 165, MSR 175, • DHL SmartSensor RFID MSR63, MSR83, MSR64, MSR84 • ECD Solid II • OnAsset Sentry 500 Flightsafe • ECS, Logistic Monitoring Gateway (Model: GWS-CSCG) • OnAsset Sentinel 100,100A and 100L, 100B and 100S, 100P • GEO Single Use loSC Edge (V2) • Onset Computer Corporation, InTemp CX 500 • Hanhaa Parcelive • Roambee, Sensor Bee, BeeBeacon • HiveTracker Beecon, HiveTracker ComBox • Sendum PT300D • Honeywell (RTHAL-C1), (3G- ST-THALP-C1)“connected • SenseAware 2000 freight” • Tive TT-3000 *** The devices are not approved on Austrian Airlines, Aerologic and Brussels Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]
  • (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers February 1, 2020 In order to facilitate the arrival of Visa Waiver Program (VWP) passengers, carriers need to be signatory to a current agreement with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). A carrier is required to be signatory to an agreement in order to transport aliens seeking admission as nonimmigrant visitors under the VWP (Title 8, U.S.C. § 1187(a)(5). The carriers listed below are currently signatory to the VWP and can transport passengers under the program. The date indicates the expiration of the current signed agreement. Agreements are valid for 7 years. If you transport VWP passengers and are not a signatory carrier, fines will be levied. Use the following link to apply to CBP to become a Signatory Carrier: https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/business-pleasure/vwp/signatory-status # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2022) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2022) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2020) 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2023) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2024) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2023) 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2024) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2025) A A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2021) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2021) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2022) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (08/26/2026) AbbVie US LLC (10/15/2026) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2026) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2025) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2026) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2022) Ace Flight Center Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
    Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
    [Show full text]