Philip H. Abelson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Philip H. Abelson Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates UNESCO – Kalinga Prize Winner – 1972 Philip H. Abelson World Renowned Scientist, Longtime Editor of ‘Science’ and Co-Discoverer of the Element Neptunium. [Born : April 27, 1913, Tacoma, WA, USA Died : August 1, 2004 at Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, USA] Organic matter equivalent in quantity to the weight of the Earth has been created by living creatures since life originated on this planet. ... Philip H. Abelson 1957 “Man is the Product of billions of years of hard-won evolution”. We must notrisk permitting Zealots, however well-intentioned, to gamble with the future. .... Philip H. Abelson, 1966 The imaginative and original mind need not be overawed by the imposing body of Present knowledge or by the complex and costly paraphernalia which today surround much of scientific activity. The great shortage in science now is not opportunity, manpower, money or laboratory space. What is really needed is more of that healthy skepticism which generates the Key ideas - the liberating concept. ....Philip H. Abelson 1 Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates Philip H. Abelson Philip Hauge Abelson (April 27, 1913 - August 1, He was a key contributor to the Manhattan Project 2004) was an American physicist, editor of scientific during World War II. Although Abelson was not literature, and science writer. formally associated with the atom bomb project, the Liquid Thermal Diffusion isotope separation technique Philip Abelson was born in 1913 in Tacoma, that he invented was used in the S-50 plant in Oak Washington. He attended Washington State Ridge, Tennessee, and proved a critical step in University where he received degrees in Chemistry creating sufficient fuel for the weapon. and Physics, and the University of California, After the war, he turned his attention under the Berkeley, where he earned his Ph.D. in Nuclear guidancne of Ross Gunn (http://www.nap.edu/ Physics. As a young physicist, he worked for Ernest readingroom/books/biomems/rgunn.html) to applying Lawrence at the University of California, Berkeley. nuclear power to naval propulsion. While not written He was among the first American scientists to verfiy at an engineering-design level, he wrote the first Nuclear Fission in an article submitted to the physics report detailing how a nuclear reactor could Physical Review in February of 1939 (http:// be installed in a submarine, providing both propulsion prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v55/i4/p418_1). In and electrical power. His report anticipated the addition, he collaborated with Nobel Prize winner nuclear submarine’s role as a missile platform. This Luis Alvarez in early nuclear research, and was the concept was later supported by Admiral Hyman G. co-discoverer of the element Neptunium on June 8, Rickover and others. Under Rickover’s relentless 1940 [with Edwin McMillan, who was awarded the leadership, concept became reality in the form of Nobel Prize for the discovery]. USS Nautilus, the world’s first nuclear-powered submarine. 2 Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates From 1951 until 1971 he served as the director of standards of scientific inquiry one must conclude the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Geophysical that there has been more hype than solid fact.” Laboratory, and served as president of the Institution However, in 1977 in the foreword for a US National from 1971 to 1978. From 1962 to 1984 he was editor Research Council, Energy and Environment report of Science magazine, published by the American he wrote, “What should the atmospheric carbon Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), dioxide content be over the next century or two to and served as its acting Executive Officer in 1974, achieve an optimum global climate ?”, implying a 1975 and 1984. From 1972 until 1974 he served as level of connection between CO2 and climate that President of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). would put him outside today’s skeptic camp. During the 1970’s he became interested in the Dr. Abelson received many distinguished awards, problem of world energy supplies. Books on the topic including The President’s National Medal of Science, include “Energy for Tomorrow” (1975), from a series the National Science Foundation’s Distinguished of lectures at the University of Washington, and Achievement Award, the American Medical “Energy II : Use Conservation and Supply”. He Association’s Scientific Achievement Award, the pointed out the possibilities of mining the Atabascan Distinguished Civilian Service Medal and the Waldo tar sands, as well as shale oil in the Colorado E. Smith Medal in 1988. In 1992 he was awarded Rockies. In addition he urged conservation and a the Public Welfare Medal, the National Academy of change of attitude towards public transit. Philip H. Science’s highest honor. Abelson (1975). Energy For Tomorrow. Dr. Abelson’s wife Neva Abelson (1910-2000) was a Perhaps his most famous work from this time period distinguished research physician who co-discovered is an editorial entitled “Enough of Pessimism” the life-saving Rh blood factor test (with L.K. (“enough of pessimism, it only leads to paralysis Diamond). Their daughter, Dr. Ellen Abelson and decay”). This became the title of a 100 essay Cherniavsky, now retired, worked as an aviation collection. Philip H. Abelson (1985). Enough of researcher at The MITRE Corporation in Virginia. Pessimism. Philip Abselson died on August 1,2004 from After 1984, he remained associated with the respiratory complications following a brief illness. magazine. Some have claimed him to be an early skeptic of the case for global warming on the basis of a lead editorial in the magazine dated March 31, Source : 1990 in which he wrote, “If the global warming “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Abelson” situation is analyzed applying the customary q 3 Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates Philip H. Abelson A Biographical Profile Scientist and Editor [Born April 27, 1913, Tacoma, WA, U.S.A. Died : August 1, 2004] Philip H. Abelson served as editor of Science magazine from 1962 to 1984. As editor, he implemented more efficient peer review procedures for scientific papers submitted to the magazine and encouraged a more active style of science reporting that included broader coverage of science and policy issues. These records include correspondence, memos, editorials and minutes of editorial board meetings. Among his scientific accomplishments collaborated in the discovery of neptunium (element 93), devised a method for large-scale synthesis of enriched uranium for use as a power source in submarines, and was director of the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Geophysical laboratory from 1953 to 1971. A number of Abelson’s personal papers, including speeches and other materials not related to his work as editor of Science, were given to the Library of Congress in early 2001. Abelson made contributions to the fields of nuclear and four of iodine. In 1940 Abeson’s attention focused physics, chemistry, microbiology, orgnanic on some work that E.M. McMillan had done the geochemistry, and to studies of the origin of life. previous year on neutron irradiation of thin layers He also wrote many items on science policy. containing uranium. McMillan had found that most of As a graduate student in 1939 at the Radiation the fission products escaped from the layer, but that Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, a nonrecoiling 2.3 - day beta emitter remained. Emilio Abelson was the first American scientist to identify Segrè had postulated that the activity followed the products of uranium fission. These included three chemistry of the ordinary rare earths and that the radioactive isotopes of antimony, six of tellurium, substance was not a transuranic. An alternative 4 è dfd Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates explanation occurred to Abelson. He felt that the The prospects for large-scale isotope separation activity was due to element 93, but that instead of were dim. At that time only microgram quantities of being an ekarhenium, element 93 was a member of uranium had been fractionated. Few uranium a new rare-earth series. Pointing out that cerium chemicals were available. Abelson devised a method could exist in two valence states, Abelson thought for large-scale synthesis of UF6 from UF4 and that the easiest way to demonstrate the existence produced the first 100 kilograms of the substance. of element 93 might be by its response to oxidzing He discovered that the uranium isotopes could be and reducing agents. He conducted some partially separated by liquid thermal diffusion. The experiments at the department of terrestrial process was conducted in an annular space with o o magnetism of the Camegie Institution of Washington cold wall at 70 C and hot wall at 286 C, with columns with encouraging but not clear-cut results. The 14 meters long. In a single column a maximum 235 235 intensities there did not permit use of thin-foil enrichment from 0.7 percent U to 1.4 percent U was obtained. By mid-1943 more than 100 kilograms technique. of partially fractionated 235U had been obtained, by Abelson went to Berkeley and discussed his ideas far the largest amount of fractionated uranium with McMillan. The two scientists then collaborated available at that time. A small pilot plant at the Naval in the discovery of element 93 (neptunium). McMillan Research Laboratory, then a larger pilot plant at the prepared and irradiated some of his thin layer Philadelphia Naval Base, and finally a 2100-column material. Within a day Abelson demonstrated that plant at Oak Ridge, TN, were built. The partially the 2.3-day activity could exist in at least two valence enriched uranium (0.85 percent 235U) was used as states. In the reduced state the fluoride was feed for the electromagnetic separation plant, which precipitated with a cerium carrier. However, in the in turn produced the 235U employed in one of the first presence of fluride and bromate in acid solution, the atomic bombs.
Recommended publications
  • February 2020 Newsletter Manhattan Project NHP Oak Ridge
    National Park Service February 2020 Department of the Interior Manhattan Project National Historical Park Oak Ridge, Tennessee Manhattan Project History in February Visit Inside the Oak Ridge Turnpike Gatehouse on Sat- Philip Abelson began working on uranium enrichment urday, February 8 at 3:30 pm (ET). Rangers will host the using liquid thermal diffusion in February of 1941. How- popular “Secrecy, Security, and Spies” program at the Turn- ever construction of his thermal diffusion plant in Phila- pike Gatehouse. The program will begin at 3:30 pm (ET) giv- delphia did not begin until January 1944. This same pro- ing visitors some insight to what life was like in Oak Ridge cess would be used later at the S-50 plant in Oak Ridge, during the Manhattan Project with the need for secrecy, all TN. of the security that surrounded the city, and the threat of Glenn Seaborg and his research group discovered Pluto- spies. The Turnpike Gatehouse is located at 2900 Oak Ridge nium while working at the University of California, Berke- Turnpike, Oak Ridge, TN 37830. ley on February 24, 1941. Construction of the -Y 12 Ura- Join a Park Ranger for a nium enrichment facilities and “Manhattan Project in Pop the X-10 Graphite Reactor be- Culture” on Saturday, Febru- gan in February 1943. Stone ary 22 at 3 pm (ET) at the Ameri- and Webster Engineering was can Museum of Science & Energy, in charge of Y-12 construction 115 East Main Street, Oak Ridge. while DuPont handled X-10. We will lead a discussion of the One year after construction Y- impact the Project had on popu- 12 sent 200 grams of uranium- lar culture in movies, music and 235 to Los Alamos, NM in Feb- television.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Loses Some Friends Francis Crick, Thomas Gold, and Philip Abelson
    Monthly Planet October 2004 Science Loses Some Friends Francis Crick, Thomas Gold, and Philip Abelson By Iain Murray he scientifi c world lost three impor- Throughout his career, Abelson used which suggests that the universe and Ttant fi gures in recent weeks, as scientifi c principles to determine genu- the laws of physics have always existed Francis Crick, Thomas Gold, and Philip ine new developments from hype and in the same, steady state. This has since Abelson have all passed away. In their publicity stunts (he was famously dis- been supplanted as the dominant cos- careers, each demonstrated the best that missive of the scientifi c value of the race mological paradigm by the Big Bang science has to offer humanity. Their loss to the moon). In that, he should prove a theory. illustrates how much worse off the state role model for true scientists. After working at the Royal Greenwich of science is today than during their Observatory, Gold moved to the United glory years. Thomas Gold States to become Professor of Astron- Astronomer Thomas Gold had an omy at Harvard. From there he moved Philip Abelson equally distinguished career, in fi elds as to Cornell, where he demonstrated that Philip Abelson was a scientist of truly diverse as engineering, physiology, and the newly discovered “pulsar” phenom- broad talents. One of America’s fi rst cosmology; and he was never afraid of enon must contain a rotating neutron nuclear physicists, he discovered the being called a maverick. A fellow of both star (a star more massive than the sun element Neptunium and designed the the Royal Society and the National Acad- but just 10 km in diameter).
    [Show full text]
  • Ija, LLP Alan D
    20-12212-mew Doc 1196 Filed 05/07/21 Entered 05/07/21 21:22:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 74 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x : In re: : Chapter 11 : GARRETT MOTION INC., et al.,1 : Case No. 20-12212 (MEW) : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : -----------------------------------------------------------------------x CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rossmery Martinez, depose and say that I am employed by Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC (KCC), the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On May 4, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of KCC caused to be served the following document via Electronic Mail upon the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A; and via First Class Mail upon the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: Notice of June Omnibus Hearing Date [Docket No. 1192] Furthermore, on May 4, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of KCC caused to be served the following document via Electronic Mail upon the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A; and via First Class Mail upon the service lists attached hereto as Exhibit B and Exhibit C: (Continued on Next Page) 1 The last four digits of Garrett Motion Inc.’s tax identification number are 3189. Due to the large number of debtor entities in these Chapter 11 Cases, which are being jointly administered, a complete list of the Debtors and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is not provided herein. A complete list of such information may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at http://www.kccllc.net/garrettmotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Character List
    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
    [Show full text]
  • Feb 05 Nucleus Corrected
    DED UN 18 O 98 F yyyy N yyyy Y O T R E I T H C E N O yyyy A E S S S L T A E A C R C I yyyyN S M S E E H C C T N IO A February 2005 Vol. LXXXIII, No. 6 yyyyC N • AMERI Monthly Meeting Prof. Shana Kelley on Nanotechnological and Biomolecules Arno Heyn Dedicated NESACS Member Organohalogens Gordon Gribble Writes Philip Abelson A National Figure in Science Call for Papers 20052005 ❖ Deadline – April 15, 2005 ❖ EASTERN November 14-17, 2005 ANALYTICAL Garden State Exhibit Center Somerset, NJ SYMPOSIUM he Eastern Analytical Symposium is the second largest meeting in the United States dedicated to the needs Innovation through Education of analytical chemists and those in the allied sciences. Please help us to make the 2005 EAS the best ever–be a part of the program by contributing your own papers for inclusion in the oral or poster sessions. To submit a contributed presentation for the 2005 EAS Technical Program, you should go to our web site, www.eas.org, after March 1, and follow the instructions for preliminary abstract submission. Invited speakers should not submit preliminary abstracts to EAS, although your session organizer may request one for his/her use. All preliminary abstracts must be submitted elec- tronically via the EAS web site at www.eas.org. The abstract submis- sion deadline is April 15, 2005. No faxed, e-mailed, or mailed prelimi- nary abstracts will be accepted. Please carefully review the following information: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Department of the Interior
    National Park Service May 2017 Department of the Interior Manhattan Project National Historical Park Oak Ridge, Tennessee May in MAPR History April Showers Brings May Flowers and Also Cabbage, British physicist James Chadwick would later be awarded the Tomatoes and Green Beans. We are hard at work in the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the neutron in May Victory Garden next to the Flat Top House with students 1932. from Willow Brook Elementary every Wednesday. Students Gorge Kistiakowsky and Vannevar Bush have been planting and caring for the garden discussed the possibility of producing U- and learning about war time rationing. 235 by using gaseous diffusion in May 1940. On May 27, 1940, the discovery of radioac- Learn about the Upcoming Total Solar tive element 93, neptunium, is announced Eclipse on Thursday, May 18. Join us for a in a report submitted by Edwin McMillan lecture featuring Chap Percival who will and Philip Abelson. The same day Leo Szil- speak on the upcoming August 21 solar ard received a manuscript from Louis eclipse. This free lecture will be held at the Turner arguing that the isotope of element American Museum of Science and Energy. A 94, still undiscovered plutonium, should reception will start at 5:30 p.m. (ET) and the be highly fissionable like uranium-235. lecture starts at 6 p.m. Glenn Seaborg was able to prove on May 3, 1941, that plutonium-239 was more fissionable than uranium-235 through his This Month’s AMSE Curatorial Collection research at the University of California, Highlight is Jack Beers’ Library Card from Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin M. Mcmillan, a Biographical Sketch
    LBL 35965 HQDFAN668 EDWIN M. MCMILLAN, A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH EDWARD J. LOFGREN, Associate Director Emeritus LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720 Presented at the International Symposium: The 50th Anniversary of the Phase Stability Principle Moscow/Dubna, Russia 12-15 July 1994 ABSTRACT. Edwin M. McMillan was one of the great scientists of the middle years of this century. He made notable contributions to nuclear, and particle physics, the chemis­ try of transuranic elements, and accelerator physics. * This work supported by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Fusion Energy, U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098. ^-TWBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT (S UNLIMITED Edwin McMillan was born on Septem­ tion Laboratory. He joined the Laboratory in ber 18,1907 at Redondo Beach, California. Soon 1934 and began a lifelong close association with after, the family moved to Pasadena, California Lawrence. where the father practised medicine for many He quickly established himself as a me­ years. The move to Pasadena was a very fortu­ ticulous and versatile experimenter in nuclear nate one because Caltech was nearby and even physics with an excellent grasp of theory. Dur­ in his early school years Ed could take advan­ ing this period he discovered *-0 with Stanley tage of the excellent public programs and lec­ Livingston and 10Be with Samuel Ruben. Per­ tures put on there by them. This contact with the haps his best experiment at that time was the world of science as Ed grew from boyhood to a demonstration of electron pair production by the young man was very important, for it nurtured absorption of gamma rays from fluorine bom­ the wide and lasting curiosity and interest that barded by protons from the cyclotron.
    [Show full text]
  • An Atomic History Chapter 2
    An Atomic History 0-3 8/11/02 7:31 AM Page 18 Chapter Two 19 THE FERMI-SZILARD PILE AND URANIUM RESEARCH The first government funding for nuclear research was allocated to purchase graphite and uranium oxide for the chain reaction experiments being organized by Fermi and World War II and the Manhattan Project Szilard at Columbia University in February 1940.2 This work, which began in New York 2 City, soon spread to Princeton, the University of Chicago, and research institutions in California.3 Even at this stage, the scientists knew that a chain reaction would need three major components in the right combination: fuel, moderator, and coolant. The fuel would contain the fissile material needed to support the fission process. The neutrons generated by the fission process had to be slowed by the moderator so that they could initiate addi- tional fission reactions. The heat that resulted from this process had to be removed by the coolant. Fermi’s initial research explored the possibility of a chain reaction with natural urani- The 1930s were a time of rapid progress in the development of nuclear physics. um. It was quickly determined that high-purity graphite served as the best neutron moder- Research accelerated in the early years of the Second World War, when new developments ator out of the materials then available.4 After extensive tests throughout 1940 and early were conceived and implemented in the midst of increasing wartime urgency. American 1941, Fermi and Szilard set up the first blocks of graphite at Columbia University in government interest in these developments was limited at first, but increased as the war September 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb” Is a Short History of the Origins and Develop- Ment of the American Atomic Bomb Program During World War H
    f.IOE/MA-0001 -08 ‘9g [ . J vb JMkirlJkhilgUimBA’mmml — .— Q RDlmm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ,:.. .- ..-. .. -,.,,:. ,.<,.;<. ~-.~,.,.- -<.:,.:-,------—,.--,,p:---—;-.:-- ---:---—---- -..>------------.,._,.... ,/ ._ . ... ,. “ .. .;l, ..,:, ..... ..’, .’< . Copies of this publication are available while supply lasts from the OffIce of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. BOX 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Attention: Information Services Telephone: (423) 576-8401 Also Available: The United States Department of Energy: A Summary History, 1977-1994 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper DO13MA-0001 a +~?y I I Tho PROJEOT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY F.G. Gosling History Division Executive Secretariat Management and Administration Department of Energy ]January 1999 edition . DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 1 Foreword The Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977 brought together for the first time in one department most of the Federal Government’s energy programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Enrichment Processes Directed Self-Study Course! This Is the Fifth of Seven Modules Available in This Self-Study Course
    MODULE 5.0: ELECTROMAGNETIC SEPARATION (CALUTRON) AND THERMAL DIFFUSION Introduction Welcome to Module 5.0 of the Uranium Enrichment Processes Directed Self-Study Course! This is the fifth of seven modules available in this self-study course. The purpose of this module is to assist the trainee in describing the general principles of the electromagnetic separation (calutron) and thermal diffusion technologies and general facility and component layouts, identifying the uses of the calutron and thermal diffusion processes in industry and the production amounts of enriched uranium, and identifying the hazards and safety concerns for each process, including major incidents. This self-study module is designed to assist you in accomplishing the learning objectives listed at the beginning of the module. There are eight sections in this module. The module has self-check questions to help you assess your understanding of the concepts presented in the module. Before you Begin It is recommended that you have access to the following materials: 9 Trainee Guide Complete the following prerequisite: 9 Module 1.0 Introduction to Uranium Enrichment 1. Review the learning objectives. 2. Read each section within the module in sequential order. How to Complete 3. Complete the self-check questions and activities within this This Module module. 4. Check off the tracking form as you complete the self-check questions and/or activity within the module. 5. Contact your administrator as prompted for a progress review meeting. 6. Contact your administrator as prompted for any additional materials and/or specific assignments. 7. Complete all assignments related to this module. If no other materials or assignments are given to you by your administrator, you have completed this module.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Seaborg Institute
    HISTORY OF THE SEABORG INSTITUTE ARQ.2_09.cover.indd 1 6/22/09 9:24 AM ContentsContents History of the Seaborg Institute The Seaborg Institute for Transactinium Science Established to educate the next generation of nuclear scientists 1 ITS Advisory Council 5 Seaborg the scientist 7 Naming seaborgium 11 Branching out 13 IGCAR honors Seaborg’s contributions to actinide science 16 Seaborg Institute for Transactinium Science/Los Alamos National Laboratory Actinide Research Quarterly The Seaborg Institute for Transactinium Science Established to educate the next generation of nuclear scientists In the late 1970s and early 1980s, research opportunities in heavy element This article was contributed by science and engineering were seldom found in university settings, and the supply Darleane C. Hoffman, professor emerita, of professionals in those fields was diminishing to the detriment of national Graduate School, Department of goals. In response to these concerns, national studies were conducted and panels Chemistry, UC Berkeley, faculty senior and committees were formed to assess the status of training and education in the scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National nuclear sciences. The studies in particular addressed the future need for scientists Laboratory, and charter director, Seaborg trained in the areas of nuclear waste management and disposal, environmental Institute, Lawrence Livermore National remediation, nuclear fuel processing, and nuclear safety analysis. Laboratory; and Christopher Gatrousis, Unfortunately, with the exception of the American Chemical Society’s former associate director of Chemistry Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology summer schools for undergradu- and Materials Science, Lawrence ates in nuclear and radiochemistry established in 1984, the studies did not lead Livermore National Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin M. Mcmillan
    E DWIN M . M C M I L L A N The transuranium elements: early history Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1951 In this talk I shall tell of the circumstances that led to the discovery of nep- tunium, the first element beyond uranium, and the partial identification of plutonium, the next one beyond that. The part of the story that lies before 1939 has already been recountered here in the Nobel Lectures of Fermi and Hahn; I played no part in that and shall not repeat it now. Rather I shall start with the discovery of fission by Hahn and Strassmann. News of this momen- tous discovery reached Berkeley early in 1939. The staff of the Radiation Laboratory was put into a state of great excitement and several experiments of a nature designed to check and extend the announced results were started, using ionization chambers and pulse amplifiers, cloud chambers, chemical methods, and so forth. I decided to do an experiment of a very simple kind. When a nucleus of uranium absorbs a neutron and fission takes place, the two resulting frag- ments fly apart with great violence, sufficient to propel them through air, or other matter, for some distance. This distance, called the "range", is a quan- tity of some interest, and I undertook to measure it by observing the depth of penetration of the fission fragments in a stack of thin aluminium foils. The fission fragments came from a thin layer of uranium oxide spread on a sheet of paper, and exposed to neutrons from a beryllium target bombarded by 8 MeV deuterons in the 37-inch cyclotron.
    [Show full text]