DOCSLIB.ORG

Chemicals in Arctic Seabirds: I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chemicals in Arctic Seabirds: I NISTIR 7196 Chemicals in Arctic Seabirds: I. Annotated Bibliography Stacy S. Vander Pol Rebecca S. Pugh Paul R. Becker U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory Hollings Marine Laboratory Charleston, SC 29412 NISTIR 7196 Chemicals in Arctic Seabirds: I. Annotated Bibliography Stacy S. Vander Pol Rebecca S. Pugh Paul R. Becker U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory Hollings Marine Laboratory Charleston, SC 29412 January 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................................................iii DISCLAIMER ...............................................................................................................................iii BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 1 BREAKDOWN OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 10 Number of references.............................................................................................................. 10 Publications............................................................................................................................. 11 Authors.................................................................................................................................... 11 Geography............................................................................................................................... 11 Tissues..................................................................................................................................... 14 Chemicals................................................................................................................................ 15 Other Keywords...................................................................................................................... 17 FUTURE WORK.......................................................................................................................... 18 Suggestions for future research............................................................................................... 18 Expansion of ASCDAB .......................................................................................................... 18 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................. 18 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 18 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1. Arctic Seabird Species ................................................................................................. 2 TABLE 2. Additional Bird Species Found in References ............................................................. 3 TABLE 3. References Written in Languages Other Than English.............................................. 11 TABLE 4. Locations of Studies................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 5. Tissue Types Examined for Chemicals...................................................................... 14 TABLE 6. Chemicals Reported ................................................................................................... 15 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are very grateful for the tremendous assistance provided by Bev Baker (Marine Resources Library) in obtaining copies of most of the references. DISCLAIMER Certain commercial equipment or instruments are identified in this paper to specify adequately the experimental procedures. Such identification does not imply recommendations or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply that the equipment or instruments are the best available for the purpose. iii BACKGROUND Due to the amount of time seabirds spend in the air or on land, humans may associate with seabirds more than any other marine organism. While only 9 of the 156 existing families of birds are considered to be seabirds (Ainley, 1980), seabirds play a major role in the marine ecosystem. The purpose of the work resulting in this report was to compare literature values of chemical concentrations in the 39 species of Arctic seabirds that live or breed in Alaska (see Table 1). Although these species served as the basis for the literature search, the papers also contained 326 other bird species with chemical values (Table 2). All of these additional species are also indexed in this annotated bibliography. Chemical data from literature tables for the 39 Alaskan seabird species are currently being entered into the Arctic Seabird Chemical Database and Annotated Bibliography (ASCDAB) for a comprehensive review. The review and chemical data of the ASCDAB will be available in the future. While the literature search and review was intended to be comprehensive, it is possible that references were overlooked or mistakes were made in entering the data. If you have any references you would like to contribute to the final database or would like to correct any information, please contact the authors. Copies of this report and electronic copies of the bibliography (Pro-Cite 5.0 for Windows or text document) may be obtained by contacting: Stacy S. Vander Pol, NIST – Charleston, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Ft. Johnson Rd., Charleston, SC 29412. Telephone: 843-762-8994; Fax: 843-762-8742; E-mail: [email protected] 1 Table 1. Arctic seabird species for which chemical data are entered in the database. The number of references for each species that are included in the annotated bibliography are listed. When multiple names are used for the same species, the name in bold was chosen for inclusion in the bibliography. The list was compiled from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2001) and AMAP (1998; identified with *). Scientific Name Common Name # of References Aethia cristatella crested auklet 1 Aethia or Cyclorrhynchus psittacula parakeet auklet 2 Aethia pusilla least auklet 1 Aethia pygmaea whiskered auklets 0 Brachyramphus brevirostris Kittlitz's murrelet 1 Brachyramphus marmoratus marbled murrelet 6 Cepphus columba pigeon guillemot 12 Cepphus or Uria grylle black guillemot 41 Cerorhinca monocerata rhinoceros auklet 16 Fratercula cirrhata tufted puffin 9 Fratercula corniculata horned puffin 5 Fulmarus glacialis northern fulmar 50 Larus argentatus herring gull 183 Larus canus common or mew gull 25 Larus glaucescens glaucous-winged gull 18 Larus hyperboreus glaucous gull 52 Larus philadelphia Bonaparte's gull 7 Larus sabini Sabine's gull 2 Oceanodroma furcata fork-tailed storm petrel 9 Oceanodroma leucorhoa Leach's storm-petrel 23 Phalacrocorax aristotelis* European shag* 25 Phalacrocorax auritus double-crested cormorant 76 Phalacrocorax pelagicus pelagic cormorant 12 Phalacrocorax penicillatus Brandt's cormorant 8 Phalacrocorax urile red-faced cormorant 5 Polysticta stelleri* Steller's eider* 3 Ptychoramphus aleuticus Cassin's auklet 6 Rissa brevirostris red-legged kittiwake 1 Rissa tridactyla black-legged kittiwake 68 Somateria mollissima* common eider* 62 Somateria spectabilis* king eider* 16 Stercorarius longicaudus long-tailed jaeger or skua 4 Stercorarius parasiticus Arctic skua or parasitic jaeger 9 Stercorarius pomarinus pomarine jaeger or skua 7 Sterna aleutica Aleutian tern 1 Sterna paradisaea Arctic tern 22 Synthliboramphus antiquus ancient murrelet 10 Uria aalge common murre or guillemot 99 Uria lomvia thick-billed murre or Brünnich's guillemot 52 2 Table 2. Additional bird species found in the Arctic seabird references. The number of references included in the annotated bibliography are listed. When multiple names are used for the same species, text in bold was chosen for inclusion in the bibliography. Scientific Name Common Name # of References Accipiter cooperii Cooper’s hawk 1 Accipiter gentilis northern goshawk 1 Accipiter nisus sparrowhawk 1 Accipiter striatus sharp-shinned hawk 3 Actitis macularia spotted sandpiper 4 Aechmophorus occidentalis western grebe 5 Agelaius phoeniceus red-winged blackbird 4 Aix sponsa wood duck 2 Alca torda razorbill 26 Alcedo atthis kingfisher 1 Alectoris graeca chukar 2 Alle or Plautus alle little auk or dovekie 19 Anas acuta northern pintail 9 Anas americana American wigeon 6 Anas clypeata shoveler or northern shoveler 5 Anas crecca common or green-winged teal 7 Anas discors blue-winged teal 3 Anas penelope Eurasian or European wigeon 1 Anas platyrhynchos mallard or pekin duck 21 Anas poecilorhyncha spot-billed duck 1 Anas rubripes American black duck 4 Anas strepera gadwall 5 Anous tenuirostris black, lesser or white-capped noddy 1 Anser albifrons white-fronted goose 2 Anser anser goose 1 Anser fabalis bean goose 1 Aphriza virgata surfbird 1 Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle 1 Ardea or Casmerodius alba great egret 2 Ardea cinerea grey heron 9 Ardea herodias great blue heron 13 Arenaria melanocephala black turnstone 1 Asio otus long-eared owl 1 Asio flammeus short-eared owl 1 Athene or Speotyto cunicularia burrowing owl 2 Aythya affinis lesser scaup 5 Aythya americana redhead duck 2 Aythya collaris ring-necked duck 4 Aythya ferina pochard 2 Aythya fuligula tufted duck 4 Aythya marila
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nogth AMERICAN BIRDS
    CHECK-LIST OF NOgTH AMERICAN BIRDS The Speciesof Birds of North America from the Arctic through Panama, Including the West Indies and Hawaiian Islands PREPARED BY THE COMMITTEE ON CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE OF THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION SEVENTH EDITION 1998 Zo61ogical nomenclature is a means, not an end, to Zo61ogical Science PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1998 Copyright 1998 by The American Ornithologists' Union All rights reserved, except that pages or sections may be quoted for research purposes. ISBN Number: 1-891276-00-X Preferred citation: American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds. 7th edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. Printed by Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................................... viii PREFACE ......................................................... ix LIST OF SPECIES ................................................... xvii THE CHECK-LIST ................................................... 1 I. Tinamiformes ............................................. 1 1. Tinamidae: Tinamous .................................. 1 II. Gaviiformes .............................................. 3 1. Gaviidae: Loons ....................................... 3 III. Podicipediformes.......................................... 5 1. Podicipedidae:Grebes .................................. 5 IV. Procellariiformes .......................................... 9 1. Diomedeidae: Albatrosses .............................
    [Show full text]
  • (369) the Glaucous Gull in Winter
    (369) THE GLAUCOUS GULL IN WINTER BY G. T. KAY. (Plates 40-53). SINCE the winter of 1941-42 the Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus) has become a comparatively numerous winter-visitor to the Shet­ land Islands. At a refuse dump on the outskirts of Lerwick where it had been rare to see more than half a dozen of these birds together, it is now a common occurrence to see thirty or forty and occasion­ ally as many as a hundred. During the winter of 1945-46, the writer, with others interested in the project, arranged for an attempt to be made to photograph particularly Glaucous Gulls and possibly Iceland Gulls (Larus glaucoides) in the vicinity of the dump. The proposal was to use still and cine cameras from hides. It was hoped that a series of photographs might be secured which would do something towards clearing up the difficulties of dis­ tinguishing between these two species in the field, which have proved to be in some respects greater than used to be supposed. We were fortunate as regards the Glaucous Gull. A series of photographs and 300ft. of cine film were taken of this arctic visitor at most stages of plumage from the bird in its first winter plumage to that of the fully adult. Further photographs were added during the winter of 1946-47. Unfortunately the only Iceland Gull seen during these two winters was a dead specimen ; an immature bird in its first winter which had been captured on a fishing boat off the east side of Shetland on January 16th, 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herring Gull Complex (Larus Argentatus - Fuscus - Cachinnans) As a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations
    The Herring Gull Complex (Larus argentatus - fuscus - cachinnans) as a Model Group for Recent Holarctic Vertebrate Radiations Dorit Liebers-Helbig, Viviane Sternkopf, Andreas J. Helbig{, and Peter de Knijff Abstract Under what circumstances speciation in sexually reproducing animals can occur without geographical disjunction is still controversial. According to the ring species model, a reproductive barrier may arise through “isolation-by-distance” when peripheral populations of a species meet after expanding around some uninhabitable barrier. The classical example for this kind of speciation is the herring gull (Larus argentatus) complex with a circumpolar distribution in the northern hemisphere. An analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation among 21 gull taxa indicated that members of this complex differentiated largely in allopatry following multiple vicariance and long-distance colonization events, not primarily through “isolation-by-distance”. In a recent approach, we applied nuclear intron sequences and AFLP markers to be compared with the mitochondrial phylogeography. These markers served to reconstruct the overall phylogeny of the genus Larus and to test for the apparent biphyletic origin of two species (argentatus, hyperboreus) as well as the unex- pected position of L. marinus within this complex. All three taxa are members of the herring gull radiation but experienced, to a different degree, extensive mitochon- drial introgression through hybridization. The discrepancies between the mitochon- drial gene tree and the taxon phylogeny based on nuclear markers are illustrated. 1 Introduction Ernst Mayr (1942), based on earlier ideas of Stegmann (1934) and Geyr (1938), proposed that reproductive isolation may evolve in a single species through D. Liebers-Helbig (*) and V. Sternkopf Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany e-mail: [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasal Salt Secretion in Falconiform Birds
    NASAL SALT SECRETION IN FALCONIFORM BIRDS TOM J. CADE and LEWIS GREENWALD Falconers have long known that various raptors, especially accipiters and eagles, exude a clear fluid from their nares while eating. We were reminded of this fact while handling a melanistic Gabar Goshawk (1Micronisus g&r), which we trapped in the Kalahari Desert in August 1964. As the hawk ate his prey, the small droplets of fluid that collected on our gloves had a strong salty taste. This discovery led us to look for nasal secretions in 16 species and 10 genera of Accipitridae and in eight species and three genera of Falconidae. We have studied behavioral and physiolog- ical aspects of nasal secretion in these raptors with reference to Schmidt-Nielsen’s (1964) hypothesis regarding the general necessity for birds to utilize an extrarenal mechanism of salt excretion, as an adjunct to efficient water reabsorption from the cloaca in concentrating uric acid, and also in connection with the overall water economy of carnivorous birds. MATERIALS AND METHODS We obtained birds and information from various sources. Our initial observa- tions were made on an adult male Gabar Goshawk, an adult female Red-necked Falcon (F&o chiqueru), and a pair of adult Pigmy Falcons (Polihierax semitor- quatus), which we trapped in the Kalahari Gemsbok National Park in the Republic of South Africa and subsequently transported to our laboratory at Syracuse Uni- versity. In addition, we obtained the following hawks from a bird dealer in New York: an immature Savannah Hawk (Heterospizias meridionalis) and a juvenile Yellow-headed Caracara (M&ago chimuchima), both from South America, and an immature Saker (F&o chewug) and an adult Laggar (Fake jugger) from India.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Ageing of Glaucous-Winged Gull and Hybrids G
    Identification and ageing of Glaucous-winged Gull and hybrids Enno B Ebels, Peter Adriaens & Jon R King laucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens treated in several (field) guides and identification G breeds around the northern Pacific, from videos published during the last two decades (eg, northern Oregon and Washington, USA, in the Harrison 1983, Grant 1986, Dunn et al 1997, east, via Alaska (including the Aleutian and National Geographic Society 1999, Sibley 2000, Pribilof Islands), USA, to the Komandorskie Doherty & Oddie 2001). This paper discusses the Islands and Kamchatka, north-eastern Russia, in basic aspects of identification of Glaucous-wing- the west. The species winters around the north- ed Gull and various hybrids and illustrates the ern Pacific, from Baja California, Mexico, to different hybrid types and plumages with photo- Hokkaido, Japan (Snow & Perrins 1998). It is a graphs; it does not pretend to be all-inclusive. It rare vagrant in most western states of the USA; it focuses on structure, plumage and bare parts. is very rare inland in central states of the USA, as Differences in voice and/or behaviour (for in- far east as the Great Lakes, and has never been stance, long-call posture) are not treated. The recorded on the American East Coast (cf Sibley paper is based on field studies by Jon King (in 2000). Vagrants have been recorded in Hong Japan and the USA) and Enno Ebels (in Japan), Kong, China, and Hawaii, USA (Snow & Perrins examination by JK of museum skins in various 1998). Amazingly, there are two records of collections, and examination by Peter Adriaens Glaucous-winged Gull in the Western Palearctic: of published and unpublished photographs, a subadult (presumably third-winter) on El including many photographs of spread wings Hierro, Canary Islands, on 7-10 February 1992; from the National Museum of Natural History and an adult at Essaouira, Morocco, on 31 (Washington, DC, USA), the Peabody Museum of January 1995 (Bakker et al 2001 and references Natural History (Yale University, New Haven, therein).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of West Palearctic Gulls P
    British Birds VOLUME 71 NUMBER 4 APRIL 1978 Field identification of west Palearctic gulls P. J. Grant The west Palearctic list includes 23 species of gulls: more than half the world total. Field guides—because of their concise format—provide inad­ equate coverage of identification and ageing, which has probably fostered the indifference felt by many bird­ watchers towards gulls. This five- part series aims to change that attitude nterest in identifying gulls is growing, as part of the recent general I improvement in identification standards, but doubtless also stimulated by the addition to the British and Irish list of no less than three Nearctic species in little over a decade (Laughing Gull Larus atricilla in 1966, Franklin's Gull L. pipixcan in 1970 and Ring-billed Gull L. delaivarensis in 1973). The realisation is slowly dawning that regular checking through flocks of gulls can be worthwhile. Just as important as identification is the ability to recognise the age of individual immatures. This is obviously necessary in studies of popula­ tion, distribution and migration, but is also a challenge in its own right to the serious bird-identifier. Indeed, identification and ageing go hand- in-hand, for it is only by practising his recognition skills on the common species—of all ages—that an observer will acquire the degree of familiarity necessary for the confident identification of the occasional rarity. The enormous debt owed to D.J. Dwight's The Gulls of the World (1925) is readily acknowledged. That work, however, has long been out of print and its format was designed for the museum and taxonomic worker; the present series of papers will provide a reference more suited to field observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Spruce Grouse Falcipennis Canadensis
    Appendix A: Birds Spruce Grouse Falcipennis canadensis Federal Listing N/A State Listing SC Global Rank G5 State Rank S3 Regional Status Very High Photo by Len Medlock Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Although spruce grouse habitat in the East is naturally patchy, anthropogenic destruction of spruce‐fir habitat has further contributed to extreme isolation of spruce grouse populations (Keppie 1997). Additionally, spruce fir habitat types are the most likely to experience negative effects from climate change (NHFG, Climate Adaptation Plan 2013) as well as impacts from pest outbreaks such as spruce budworm and balsam woolly adelgid. Anecdotal evidence (limited chick and female sightings) suggests that spruce grouse are limited in New Hampshire. High market demand for spruce and fir has led to extensive cutting of mature softwood habitat at lower elevations. In New Hampshire, Weeks (quoted in Silver 1957) stated that spruce grouse were once common in New Hampshire at the time of settlement, but by 1880, they were seldom seen. Habitat loss, market hunting, and susceptibility of populations to harvest were thought to be the primary causes of decline (Silver 1957). Distribution Spruce grouse are distributed throughout boreal forests of North America. In the East, spruce grouse are at the southern extent of their range in northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan’s Lower Peninsula, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine (AOU 1983). Spruce grouse are listed in other states/provinces, including Vermont (endangered), New York (endangered), Nova Scotia (Uncommon), Minnesota (Uncommon), Wisconsin (Threatened), and Michigan (Uncommon) (Lumsden and Weeden 1963). In New Hampshire spruce grouse are found primarily within the White Mountain National Forests and isolated habitat fragments throughout Coos County and are a species of special concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York
    CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, BIRDS AND MAMMALS OF NEW YORK STATE Including Their Legal Status Eastern Milk Snake Moose Blue-spotted Salamander Common Loon New York State Artwork by Jean Gawalt Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Page 1 of 30 February 2019 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Diversity Group 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4754 This web version is based upon an original hard copy version of Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York, Including Their Protective Status which was first published in 1985 and revised and reprinted in 1987. This version has had substantial revision in content and form. First printing - 1985 Second printing (rev.) - 1987 Third revision - 2001 Fourth revision - 2003 Fifth revision - 2005 Sixth revision - December 2005 Seventh revision - November 2006 Eighth revision - September 2007 Ninth revision - April 2010 Tenth revision – February 2019 Page 2 of 30 Introduction The following list of amphibians (34 species), reptiles (38), birds (474) and mammals (93) indicates those vertebrate species believed to be part of the fauna of New York and the present legal status of these species in New York State. Common and scientific nomenclature is as according to: Crother (2008) for amphibians and reptiles; the American Ornithologists' Union (1983 and 2009) for birds; and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Expected occurrence in New York State is based on: Conant and Collins (1991) for amphibians and reptiles; Levine (1998) and the New York State Ornithological Association (2009) for birds; and New York State Museum records for terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functional Alterations of the Avian Salt Gland Subsequent to Osmotic Stress Zeinab M
    The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (April 2013) Vol. 51, Page 346– 360 The Functional Alterations of The Avian Salt Gland Subsequent to Osmotic Stress Zeinab M. El–Gohary, Fawkeia I. El-Sayad, Hanaa Ali Hassan and Aya Mohammed Magdy Hamoda Zoology Dept., Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Egypt Abstract: Background: Many terrestrial non-marine birds have functional salt glands. Their salt glands are usually quiescent. However, such glands show remarkable levels of phenotypic plasticity both morphological and physiological as a consequence of drinking saline water. Objective: The current investigation was conducted to reveal in more detail the different functional alterations of the duck`s salt glands subsequent to high salt osmotic stress. Material and methods: The selected avian species were the domestic female (Anas platyrhyncha) and the wild migratory (Anas clypeata ) ducks. Two groups of domestic and one group of wild ducks were considered in the present study , each of which included nine adult ducks. The high salt osmotic stress was induced by replacing drinking tap water of the domestic ducks with 1% sodium chloride solution for two consecutive weeks. The measured parameters were included some electrolytes in both serum and glandular tissue. Also, Na-K- ATPase activity and aldosterone concentrations were considered. Results: The present study elucidated that serum sodium, potassium, chloride and uric acid of the wild migratory ducks were markedly higher than those of both salt-stressed and control ducks. In addition, serum aldosterone concentration of the wild migratory ducks was distinctly higher in comparison with those of the control and the salt-stressed ones. Moreover, salt gland tissue homogenate electrolyte contents followed the same pattern as those of serum electrolyte concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in Marine and Saline Environments: Living in Dry Habitats
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 401-410, 2000 Birds in marine and saline environments: living in dry habitats Aves en ambientes marinos y salinos: viviendo en habitats secos PABLOSABAT Departamento de Ciencias Ecologicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile, e-mail: psabat@ abello.dic. uchile.cl ABSTRACT For birds, saline environments such as maritime and salt marsh habitats are essentially dry habitats. When birds drink saline water or consume salt-loaded preys, the osmolarity of their body fluids increases. In order to maintain the osmotic equilibrium, they have to eliminate the excess of electrolytes ingested with preys or water. Marine birds use salt glands, which produce excretion solutions more concentrated than seawater to eliminate excess salt. The physiology and phenotypic plasticity of nasal glands appears to be correlated with the ecological features of species. Birds can also minimize osmotic stress by choosing hypo-osmotic preys, preys with reduced water content, and/or by decreasing salt intake. Although the kidney of birds is clearly less efficiently in its capacity to concentrate the urine than that of mammals, there are interspecific differences in renal structure and physiology that may be correlated with the birds ecological habits, and hence to represent adaptive mechanism to prevent water loss. The kidney may be especially important in taxa that lack active salt gland, such as passerines. Passerines, which are supposed to have limited ability to use saline habitats, include several marine and salt-marsh species. In this review I show that the interaction of the kidney and rectum in osmoregulatory physiology, coupled with selective feeding behavior play a major role in the maintenance of water and salt balance of passerines living in salty environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Boundaries in the Herring and Lesser Black-Backed Gull Complex J
    Species boundaries in the Herring and Lesser Black-backed Gull complex J. Martin Collinson, David T. Parkin, Alan G. Knox, George Sangster and Lars Svensson Caspian Gull David Quinn ABSTRACT The BOURC Taxonomic Sub-committee (TSC) recently published recommendations for the taxonomy of the Herring Gull and Lesser Black-backed Gull complex (Sangster et al. 2007). Six species were recognised: Herring Gull Larus argentatus, Lesser Black-backed Gull L. fuscus, Caspian Gull L. cachinnans,Yellow-legged Gull L. michahellis, Armenian Gull L. armenicus and American Herring Gull L. smithsonianus.This paper reviews the evidence underlying these decisions and highlights some of the areas of uncertainty. 340 © British Birds 101 • July 2008 • 340–363 Herring Gull taxonomy We dedicate this paper to the memory of Andreas Helbig, our former colleague on the BOURC Taxonomic Sub-committee. He was a fine scientist who, in addition to leading the development of the BOU’s taxonomic Guidelines, made significant contributions to our understanding of the evolutionary history of Palearctic birds, especially chiffchaffs and Sylvia warblers. He directed one of the major research programmes into the evolution of the Herring Gull complex. His tragic death, in 2005, leaves a gap in European ornithology that is hard to fill. Introduction taimyrensis is discussed in detail below, and the Until recently, the Herring Gull Larus argentatus name is used in this paper to describe the birds was treated by BOU as a polytypic species, with breeding from the Ob River east to the at least 12 subspecies: argentatus, argenteus, Khatanga (Vaurie 1965). There has been no heuglini, taimyrensis, vegae, smithsonianus, molecular work comparing the similar and atlantis, michahellis, armenicus, cachinnans, intergrading taxa argentatus and argenteus barabensis and mongolicus (Vaurie 1965; BOU directly and any reference to ‘argentatus’ in this 1971; Grant 1986; fig.
    [Show full text]