Does the Administrator Community of Polish Wikipedia Shut out New Candidates Because of the Acquaintance Relation?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Does the Administrator Community of Polish Wikipedia Shut out New Candidates Because of the Acquaintance Relation? International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, vol 7 no 1 & 2, year 2014, http://www.iariajournals.org/intelligent_systems/ 103 Does the Administrator Community of Polish Wikipedia Shut out New Candidates Because of the Acquaintance Relation? Justyna Spychała Mateusz Adamczyk Piotr Turek Faculty of Polish Studies Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics independent University of Warsaw University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland Warsaw, Poland Warsaw, Poland Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract—Administrators of Wikipedia are its most dedicated the case. Probably, it is caused by growing expectations about users, which are granted special privileges and burdened with new candidates. As the Polish Wikipedia grows, the number great responsibility for the Wikipedia. The administrators are of articles also grows. Articles are getting longer and more usually nominated by the community and then elected by voting complex. Users gain more experience and have richer edits or by reaching a consensus. This paper examines period 2005 – history. This paper contains some data and conclusions, which 2011. In most recent years of examined period, decline in Spychała et al. [1] were unable to present due to limitations a number of newly appointed administrators can be observed. There are two main hypotheses of seen phenomena: with growth placed on length of the conference publication. of Wikipedia it is harder to become an administrator or existing Administrators (or sysops) are very dedicated and trust- administrator community is shutting out new candidates due worthy participants of the Wikipedia projects in all language to acquaintance relation. This research is an attempt to find out whether the community is not becoming less open to new versions. Thanks to community decision, they have received users and new potential administrators, because of their lack of special privileges and use administrative tools to exercise chances to gain reputation. The key here is the understanding preventive and policing functions. Administrators have the of social aspects driving the process of Request for Adminship right to edit all the Wikipedia articles as well as many other (RfA) votings. Based on our previous work focused on social privileges—understood rather as duties. These powers are not networks induced from collective activity of wikipedians, this meant to give them editorial control over the project, but paper extends it by the annual analysis of obtained statistics rather provide mentoring and technical assistance in other and examination of clustering coefficient as an approximation of wikipedians’ work. Administrators also serve by providing social capital. We present the dynamics of relationships between assistance, especially to newcomers, in editing of Wikipedia. voters and candidates across several years of Polish Wikipedia All newly registered users get their guides—the administrators development. Obtained data allowed us to answer the question, whether administrator community of Polish Wikipedia shuts out to whom they can always turn for help and be sure they will new candidates because of the acquaintance relation. receive it as soon as possible. Keywords—Multidimensional Behavioral Social Network; Kittur et al. [4] claimed, that due to increasing amount Wikipedia; Request for Adminship; Clustering Coefficient; Ad- of management work at Wikipedia, such as content quality ministrators’ Lifespans; Administrator Community versus core; control, coordination, maintenance, that are caused by the Wikipedia’s users behavioural patterns. increasing popularity and amount of content in Wikipedia, the importance of administrators is increasing. This creates a I. INTRODUCTION potential risk that administrators may become overwhelmed by the amount of work and their response times become Spychała et al. [1] presented results of their research on longer. Especially, Ortega et al. [5] showed that after peak The Third International Conference on Advanced Collabora- of popularity of the Free Encyclopaedia, its user base growth tive Networks, Systems and Applications (COLLA 2013 [2]) slowed down. But in the same time, the amount of content is in Nice, France. Presented research concerned possibility of still increasing. If the Wikipedia is to keep its pace of growth, closing up the Administrator Community of Polish Wikipedia then some measures to increase its users base have to be taken. by shutting out new candidates. It was a refinement of work done by Turek et al. [3]. This paper is an extended version However, the Polish community of Administrators is grow- of paper written by Spychała et al. [1] and presented on ing slower than expected; hence, the question whether and COLLA 2013. Similarly to paper written by Spychała et al. [1], why this community shuts out candidates for new members. this paper covers the range of years 2005-2011 and its goal is Currently, there are 149 administrators on Polish Wikipedia— to answer the question if the reason for decrease in successful for comparison, 1,147 administrators work currently on the RfA votings in Polish Wikipedia is choosing Administrators English version. Of course, the English version is much more based on acquaintance. As the administrator community of developed, but sheer number of people with administrative Polish Wikipedia is rather small, especially compared to the privileges is impressive. On the other hand, Ortega et al. [5] English one, it could be valid claim. But, we argue that it is not notes that the Polish Wikipedia has the highest rate of auto- 2014, © Copyright by authors, Published under agreement with IARIA - www.iaria.org International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, vol 7 no 1 & 2, year 2014, http://www.iariajournals.org/intelligent_systems/ 104 mated bots used to help administrators in their duties. This fact several papers. In one of them, Burke et al. [7] try to indicate can explain why the number of administrators is not enough the features and qualities determinative for the user selection to to prophesize doom of Polish Wikipedia. the position of administrator. On the basis of publicly available tips for candidates [8], a set of attributes, that a future admin- Administrators are elected in a special procedure, the rules istrator should have has been developed. Behavioural data and of which are clearly defined. This procedure is called Request comments, not page text, were used to evaluate candidates. for Adminship (RfA). As it was already mentioned, the privi- Authors counted each candidate’s edits in various namespaces leges for administrators are granted by Wikipedia community, (article, article talk, Wikipedia, Wikipedia talk, wiki projects, in a vote in which the right to vote is given to those Wikipedia etc.) to calculate total contribution as well as contribution users, who are well-known and respected members of the diversity. They also measured user interaction, mainly activity community and know and respect the established rules on the on talk pages, but also participation on arbitration or mediation website. Wikipedians who are candidates for the administrator committee pages and a few others. There are also several position must “have a minimum of 1,000 not deleted edits, other statistics, but the ones mentioned seemed to be the most first of which has to be made at least 3 months prior to the relevant to the candidate’s success. Especially successful were date of filing the candidacy”. Nominations for administrator candidates with strong edit diversity, mere edits in Wikipedia candidates are adopted by a special form on the web page articles did not add much more chance of success. In user that also contains the regulations and the list of candidates. interactions, article talk page edits were the best predictor New administrators are elected during a voting that lasts a of success, with other authors talk page edits being rather week (168 hours). Wikipedians, in order to be allowed to vote, poor. Burke et al. also confirmed Kittur’s [9] results that the must have been registered for at least one month and have a percentage of indirect work (coordination, discussion, etc.) minimum of 500 not deleted edits. grows over time, the share of articles in all Wikipedia edits Interestingly, in case of English version of Wikipedia, no is decreasing. formal conditions are required in order to declare a candidacy It is noteworthy that in Burke et al. [7] only the qualities for an administrator. The only conditions are possession of of each user were evaluated. Leskovec et al. [10] have shown an account and trust among other users. Despite this, the page that the outcome of the voting depends on the candidate and with the declaration forms contains the information that in case his or her place in the community. They found out that the of self-nominating, it is recommended to have at least 2,000 probability of one person’s vote to be positive is correlated edits for a minimum period of 3 months. Another important with the basic relative figures such as: who—voter or candidate difference is that in the case of English version of Wikipedia, has more edits, who has more barnstars (awards given by new administrators are elected not by voting, but by discussion. other Wikipedia users), the extent of collaboration of the two, Moreover, “the consensus in RFA is not achieved by exceeding etc. Authors strongly noted that the vote value (positive or a threshold, but by the strength of the justification of the negative) is not just a function of candidate, but both voter candidacy”. and candidate. There is one aspect of this paper which distinguishes Kittur et al. [11], analysed the impact of the similarity of it from work presented by Spychała et al. [1], namely our users on their mutual assessment. The examined data were analysis of lifespans of administrators. It allowed us to make collected from three websites: Wikipedia, Stack Overflow, sure that research, which is main topic of this paper, is well and Epinions. The important feature of those websites is the founded.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Wikipedia: an Effective Anarchy Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D
    Wikipedia: An Effective Anarchy Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D. Kozminski University [email protected] Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology conference in Baltimore, MD (USA), 27-31 March, 2012 (work in progress) This paper is the first report from a virtual ethnographic study (Hine, 2000; Kozinets, 2010) of Wikipedia community conducted 2006-2012, by the use of participative methods, and relying on an narrative analysis of Wikipedia organization (Czarniawska, 2000; Boje, 2001; Jemielniak & Kostera, 2010). It serves as a general introduction to Wikipedia community, and is also a basis for a discussion of a book in progress, which is going to address the topic. Contrarily to a common misconception, Wikipedia was not the first “wiki” in the world. “Wiki” (originated from Hawaiian word for “quick” or “fast”, and named after “Wiki Wiki Shuttle” on Honolulu International Airport) is a website technology based on a philosophy of tracking changes added by the users, with a simplified markup language (allowing easy additions of, e.g. bold, italics, or tables, without the need to learn full HTML syntax), and was originally created and made public in 1995 by Ward Cunningam, as WikiWikiWeb. WikiWikiWeb was an attractive choice among enterprises and was used for communication, collaborative ideas development, documentation, intranet, knowledge management, etc. It grew steadily in popularity, when Jimmy “Jimbo” Wales, then the CEO of Bomis Inc., started up his encyclopedic project in 2000: Nupedia. Nupedia was meant to be an online encyclopedia, with free content, and written by experts. In an attempt to meet the standards set by professional encyclopedias, the creators of Nupedia based it on a peer-review process, and not a wiki-type software.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia
    information Article Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia Włodzimierz Lewoniewski * , Krzysztof W˛ecel and Witold Abramowicz Department of Information Systems, Pozna´nUniversity of Economics and Business, 61-875 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (W.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 13 May 2020 Abstract: One of the most important factors impacting quality of content in Wikipedia is presence of reliable sources. By following references, readers can verify facts or find more details about described topic. A Wikipedia article can be edited independently in any of over 300 languages, even by anonymous users, therefore information about the same topic may be inconsistent. This also applies to use of references in different language versions of a particular article, so the same statement can have different sources. In this paper we analyzed over 40 million articles from the 55 most developed language versions of Wikipedia to extract information about over 200 million references and find the most popular and reliable sources. We presented 10 models for the assessment of the popularity and reliability of the sources based on analysis of meta information about the references in Wikipedia articles, page views and authors of the articles. Using DBpedia and Wikidata we automatically identified the alignment of the sources to a specific domain. Additionally, we analyzed the changes of popularity and reliability in time and identified growth leaders in each of the considered months. The results can be used for quality improvements of the content in different languages versions of Wikipedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, It Is the Largest, Fastest-Growing and Most Popular General Reference Work Currently Available on the Internet
    Tomasz „Polimerek” Ganicz Wikimedia Polska WikipediaWikipedia andand otherother WikimediaWikimedia projectsprojects WhatWhat isis Wikipedia?Wikipedia? „Imagine„Imagine aa worldworld inin whichwhich everyevery singlesingle humanhuman beingbeing cancan freelyfreely shareshare inin thethe sumsum ofof allall knowledge.knowledge. That'sThat's ourour commitment.”commitment.” JimmyJimmy „Jimbo”„Jimbo” Wales Wales –– founder founder ofof WikipediaWikipedia As defined by itself: Wikipedia is a free multilingual, open content encyclopedia project operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its name is a blend of the words wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites) and encyclopedia. Launched in January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, it is the largest, fastest-growing and most popular general reference work currently available on the Internet. OpenOpen and and free free content content RichardRichard StallmanStallman definition definition of of free free software: software: „The„The wordword "free""free" inin ourour namename doesdoes notnot referrefer toto price;price; itit refersrefers toto freedom.freedom. First,First, thethe freedomfreedom toto copycopy aa programprogram andand redistributeredistribute itit toto youryour neighbors,neighbors, soso thatthat theythey cancan useuse itit asas wellwell asas you.you. Second,Second, thethe freedomfreedom toto changechange aa program,program, soso ththatat youyou cancan controlcontrol itit insteadinstead ofof itit controllingcontrolling you;you; forfor this,this, thethe sourcesource
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Bias in Wikipedia Content on Famous Persons
    ASI21577.tex 14/6/2011 16: 39 Page 1 Cultural Bias in Wikipedia Content on Famous Persons Ewa S. Callahan Department of Film, Video, and Interactive Media, School of Communications, Quinnipiac University, 275 Mt. Carmel Avenue, Hamden, CT 06518-1908. E-mail: [email protected] Susan C. Herring School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1320 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405-3907. E-mail: [email protected] Wikipedia advocates a strict “neutral point of view” This issue comes to the fore when one considers (NPOV) policy. However, although originally a U.S-based, that Wikipedia, although originally a U.S-based, English- English-language phenomenon, the online, user-created language phenomenon, now has versions—or “editions,” as encyclopedia now has versions in many languages. This study examines the extent to which content and perspec- they are called on Wikipedia—in many languages, with con- tives vary across cultures by comparing articles about tent and perspectives that can be expected to vary across famous persons in the Polish and English editions of cultures. With regard to coverage of persons in different Wikipedia.The results of quantitative and qualitative con- language versions, Kolbitsch and Maurer (2006) claim that tent analyses reveal systematic differences related to Wikipedia “emphasises ‘local heroes”’ and thus “distorts the different cultures, histories, and values of Poland and the United States; at the same time, a U.S./English- reality and creates an imbalance” (p. 196). However, their language advantage is evident throughout. In conclusion, evidence is anecdotal; empirical research is needed to inves- the implications of these findings for the quality and tigate the question of whether—and if so, to what extent—the objectivity of Wikipedia as a global repository of knowl- cultural biases of a country are reflected in the content of edge are discussed, and recommendations are advanced Wikipedia entries written in the language of that country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete, Longitudinal and Multi-Language Dataset of the Wikipedia Link Networks
    WikiLinkGraphs: A Complete, Longitudinal and Multi-Language Dataset of the Wikipedia Link Networks Cristian Consonni David Laniado Alberto Montresor DISI, University of Trento Eurecat, Centre Tecnologic` de Catalunya DISI, University of Trento [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract and result in a huge conceptual network. According to Wiki- pedia policies2 (Wikipedia contributors 2018e), when a con- Wikipedia articles contain multiple links connecting a sub- cept is relevant within an article, the article should include a ject to other pages of the encyclopedia. In Wikipedia par- link to the page corresponding to such concept (Borra et al. lance, these links are called internal links or wikilinks. We present a complete dataset of the network of internal Wiki- 2015). Therefore, the network between articles may be seen pedia links for the 9 largest language editions. The dataset as a giant mind map, emerging from the links established by contains yearly snapshots of the network and spans 17 years, the community. Such graph is not static but is continuously from the creation of Wikipedia in 2001 to March 1st, 2018. growing and evolving, reflecting the endless collaborative While previous work has mostly focused on the complete hy- process behind it. perlink graph which includes also links automatically gener- The English Wikipedia includes over 163 million con- ated by templates, we parsed each revision of each article to nections between its articles. This huge graph has been track links appearing in the main text. In this way we obtained exploited for many purposes, from natural language pro- a cleaner network, discarding more than half of the links and cessing (Yeh et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. the Case of Wikipedia
    Genre analysis online encycloped The case of Wikipedia AnnaTereszkiewicz Genre analysis of online encyclopedias The case of Wikipedia Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Publikacja dofi nansowana przez Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego ze środków wydziałowej rezerwy badań własnych oraz Instytutu Filologii Angielskiej PROJEKT OKŁADKI Bartłomiej Drosdziok Zdjęcie na okładce: Łukasz Stawarski © Copyright by Anna Tereszkiewicz & Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Wydanie I, Kraków 2010 All rights reserved Książka, ani żaden jej fragment nie może być przedrukowywana bez pisemnej zgody Wydawcy. W sprawie zezwoleń na przedruk należy zwracać się do Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. ISBN 978-83-233-2813-1 www.wuj.pl Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Redakcja: ul. Michałowskiego 9/2, 31-126 Kraków tel. 12-631-18-81, 12-631-18-82, fax 12-631-18-83 Dystrybucja: tel. 12-631-01-97, tel./fax 12-631-01-98 tel. kom. 0506-006-674, e-mail: [email protected] Konto: PEKAO SA, nr 80 1240 4722 1111 0000 4856 3325 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................................. 14 1. Genology as a study ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Point of View: a Wikipedia Reader
    w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NATHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wikipedia Reader
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader Lovink, G.; Tkacz, N. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lovink, G., & Tkacz, N. (2011). Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader. (INC reader; No. 7). Institute of Network Cultures. http://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%237reader_Wikipedia.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:05 Oct 2021 w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Cross-Cultural Relations from Wikipedia - a Study of 31 European Food Cultures
    Mining cross-cultural relations from Wikipedia - A study of 31 European food cultures Paul Laufer Claudia Wagner Graz University of Technology GESIS & U. of Koblenz Graz, Austria Cologne, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Fabian Flöck Markus Strohmaier GESIS GESIS & U. of Koblenz Cologne, Germany Cologne, Germany fabian.fl[email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT the editor community of the Romanian-language Wikipedia For many people, Wikipedia represents one of the primary could either have a deviant mental picture of the French sources of knowledge about foreign cultures. Yet, differ- cuisine { or it might estimate the priorities of Romanian- ent Wikipedia language editions offer different descriptions speaking readers to rather be on meat-based French deli- of cultural practices. Unveiling diverging representations of catessen than on wine and baking goods. Further, the gen- cultures provides an important insight, since they may foster eral interest of the Romanian-speaking readers in the French the formation of cross-cultural stereotypes, misunderstand- cuisine (for example measured by the number of views of the ings and potentially even conflict. In this work, we explore article about French cuisine in the Romanian language edi- to what extent the descriptions of cultural practices in var- tion) might serve to potentially displease any Francophile, ious European language editions of Wikipedia differ on the since the Romanian speaking community might show no- example of culinary practices and propose an approach to tably less interest in the French kitchen than in the Russian mine cultural relations between different language commu- or Hungarian one. This hypothetical scenario serves as an nities trough their description of and interest in their own example for numerous similar real-world cases (which can- and other communities' food culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia @ 20
    Wikipedia @ 20 Wikipedia @ 20 Stories of an Incomplete Revolution Edited by Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology This work is subject to a Creative Commons CC BY- NC 4.0 license. Subject to such license, all rights are reserved. The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from Knowledge Unlatched, Northeastern University Communication Studies Department, and Wikimedia Foundation. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans by Westchester Publishing Ser vices. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Reagle, Joseph, editor. | Koerner, Jackie, editor. Title: Wikipedia @ 20 : stories of an incomplete revolution / edited by Joseph M. Reagle and Jackie Koerner. Other titles: Wikipedia at 20 Description: Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2020] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020000804 | ISBN 9780262538176 (paperback) Subjects: LCSH: Wikipedia--History. Classification: LCC AE100 .W54 2020 | DDC 030--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020000804 Contents Preface ix Introduction: Connections 1 Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner I Hindsight 1 The Many (Reported) Deaths of Wikipedia 9 Joseph Reagle 2 From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia’s First Two Decades 21 Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison 3 From Utopia to Practice and Back 43 Yochai Benkler 4 An Encyclopedia with Breaking News 55 Brian Keegan 5 Paid with Interest: COI Editing and Its Discontents 71 William Beutler II Connection 6 Wikipedia and Libraries 89 Phoebe Ayers 7 Three Links: Be Bold, Assume Good Faith, and There Are No Firm Rules 107 Rebecca Thorndike- Breeze, Cecelia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikimania Is an Annual Global Event Devoted to Wikimedia Projects
    Wikimania is an annual global event devoted to Wikimedia projects around the globe (including Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wiktionary, Wikispecies, and Wikimedia Commons). The conference is a community gathering, giving the editors and users of Wikimedia projects an opportunity to meet each other, exchange ideas, report on research and projects, and collaborate on the future of the projects. Maps The Accommodation Guide 1. Medical Univ. Dormitory 1 5. Gdansk Univ. Dormitory 6 9. Hotel Gdansk 13. Hotel Hanza 2. SSM Youth Hostel 1 6. Old Town Hostel 10. Villa Biala Lilia 3. Railway Station 7. Music Academy Dormitory 2 11. Hotel Parnas W - WIKIMANIA 4. Hotel Hilton 8. Dom Muzyka (Musician House) 12. Holland House The Map of the Neighbourhood of the Venue 1. Conference Venue 3. A good place to buy souvenirs Green line: a route to the Venue 2. Areas with bars and restaurants 4. Ferry across the river You can find more information here: http://bit.ly/buTMGR 2 | Page Program at a Glance Friday, July 9 Friday, July 9 - Baltic Philharmonic Concert hall Jazz hall Green hall Oak hall 08.00 - 09.00 On-Site Registration Opening Ceremony (10 min for organizers) + Opening Plenary (Sue Gardner + WMF Board) 09.00 - 11.00 + Wikimania Madness (last 15 min) 11.00 - 11.30 Coffee Break + Spotlight on Posters Panels: Chapters: Collaboration Workshop: Brainstorming Talks: Wikiversity Talk+Workshop: Accessibility 11:30 - 13:00 and Coordination Wikimedia and Social Media Workshop 13.00 - 14.30 Lunch Break at Baltic Philharmonic: Gdańsk salon and foyer level
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia Cultural Diversity Dataset: a Complete Cartography for 300
    Wikipedia Cultural Diversity Dataset: A Complete Cartography for 300 Language Editions Marc Miquel-Ribé David Laniado Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Catalunya Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya [email protected] [email protected] Abstract content by each community obeys to different dynamics influenced by cultural and contextual factors (Hecht & In this paper we present the Wikipedia Cultural Diversity Gergle, 2010a; Samoilenko, Karimi, Edler, Kunegis, & dataset. For each existing Wikipedia language edition, the Strohmaier, 2016). dataset contains a classification of the articles that represent its associated cultural context, i.e. all concepts and entities related In order to understand better the composition of each to the language and to the territories where it is spoken. We Wikipedia language edition, in our previous work (Miquel- describe the methodology we employed to classify articles, and Ribé, 2016; Miquel-Ribé & Laniado, 2016) we developed the rich set of features that we defined to feed the classifier, and that are released as part of the dataset. We present several a methodology to identify the articles related to the editors’ purposes for which we envision the use of this dataset, geographical and cultural context (i.e. their places, including detecting, measuring and countering content gaps in traditions, language, agriculture, biographies, etc.). We the Wikipedia project, and encouraging cross-cultural research named such articles Cultural Context Content (CCC). in the field of digital humanities. Results showed that among the largest 40 Wikipedia language editions, these articles represent on average the 25% of all the content and are mostly exclusive, i.e. they Introduction have no equivalence across language editions.
    [Show full text]