DOCSLIB.ORG

A Wikipedia Reader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader Lovink, G.; Tkacz, N. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lovink, G., & Tkacz, N. (2011). Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader. (INC reader; No. 7). Institute of Network Cultures. http://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%237reader_Wikipedia.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:05 Oct 2021 w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NaTHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing. This publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Unported. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. 4 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 5 The INC Reader series is derived from conference contributions and produced CONTENTS by the Institute of Network Cultures. They are available in print and pdf form. Critical Point of View is the seventh publication in the series. Previously published INC Readers: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz INC Reader #6: Geert Lovink and Rachel Somers Miles (eds.), The ‘C’ in CPOV: Introduction to the CPOV Reader 9 Video Vortex Reader II, 2011 ENCYCLOPEDIC KNOWLEDGE This reader continues to examine critical issues that are emerging around the success of YouTube, the rise of other online video sharing platforms, and how the moving image Joseph Reagle has become expansively more popular on the web, contributing to the culture The Argument Engine 14 and ecology of the internet and our everyday lives. Dan O’Sullivan Download a free pdf from www.networkcultures.org/videovortex. What is an Encyclopedia? From Pliny to Wikipedia 34 INC Reader #5: Scott McQuire, Meredith Martin and Sabine Niederer (eds.), Lawrence Liang A Brief History of the Internet from the 15th to the 18th Century 50 Urban Screens Reader, 2009 This reader is the first book to focus entirely on the topic of urban screens. Offering Amila Akdag Salah, Cheng Gao, Krzystztof Suchecki, and Andrea Scharnhorst texts from a range of leading theorists to case studies on artist projects, screen operators Generating Ambiguities: Mapping Category Names of Wikipedia to UDC and curators experiences, this collection offers a rich resource for exploring the inter - Class Numbers 63 sections of digital media, cultural practices and urban space. Download a free pdf from COMPUTATIONAL CULTURES www.networkcultures.org/urbanscreens. R. Stuart Geiger INC Reader #4: Geert Lovink and Sabine Niederer (eds.), The Lives of Bots 78 Video Vortex Reader: Responses to YouTube, 2008. Nathaniel Tkacz This reader is a collection of critical texts dealing with the rapidly emerging world of online The Politics of Forking Paths 94 video – from its explosive rise in 2005 with YouTube, to its future as a significant form Edgar Enyedy and Nathaniel Tkacz of personal media. Download a free pdf from www.networkcultures.org/videovortex. ‘Good luck with your wikiPAIDia’: Reflections on the 2002 Fork of the Spanish Wikipedia. 110 INC Reader #3: Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter (eds.), An interview with Edgar Enyedy MyCreativity Reader: A Critique of Creative Industries, 2007. Peter B. Kaufman This reader is a collection of critical research into the creative industries. The material Video for Wikipedia and the Open Web 119 developed out of the MyCreativity convention on International Creative Industries Re– Johanna Niesyto search held in Amsterdam, November 2006. This two-day conference sought to bring A Journey from Rough Consensus to Political Creativity: Insights from the English the trends and tendencies around the creative industries into critical question. and German Language Wikipedias 139 Download a free pdf from www.networkcultures.org/mycreativity. Hans Varghese Mathews Outline of a Clustering Procedure and the Use of its Output 159 INC Reader #2: Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen and Matteo Pasquinelli (eds.), C’LICK ME: A Netporn Studies Reader, 2007. INTERVENTIONS This anthology collects the best material from two years of debate from ‘The Art and Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern Politics of Netporn’ 2005 conference to the 2007 ‘C’LICK ME’ festival. The C’LICK ME Wikipedia Art: Citation as Performative Act 165 reader opens the field of ‘internet pornology’, with contributions by academics, Nicholas Carr artists and activists. Download a free pdf from www.networkcultures.org/netporn. Questioning Wikipedia 191 INC Reader #1: Geert Lovink and Soenke Zehle (eds.), Alan Shapiro Incommunicado Reader, 2005. Diary of a Young Wikipedian 203 The Incommunicado Reader brings together papers written for the June Florian Cramer 2005 conference ‘Incommunicado: Information Technology for Everybody A Brechtian Media Design: Annemieke van der Hoek’s Epicpedia 221 Else’. The publication includes a CD-ROM of interviews with speakers. Patrick Lichty Download a free pdf from www.networkcultures.org/incommunicado. Digital Anarchy, Social Media, and WikiLeaks 226 6 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 7 POLITICS OF EXCLUSION Maja van der Velden When Knowledges Meet: Wikipedia and Other Stories from the Contact Zone 236 Heather Ford The Missing Wikipedians 258 Mark Graham Wiki Space: Palimpsests and the Politics of Exclusion 269 Gautam John Wikipedia in India: Past, Present and Future 283 Dror Kamir and Johanna Niesyto User DrorK: A Call for a Free Content Alternative for Sources. An interview with Dror Kamir 288 GOVERNANCE & AUTHORITY Andrew Famiglietti The Right to Fork: A Historical Survey of De/centralization in Wikipedia 296 Matheiu O’Neil Wikipedia and Authority 309 Mayo Fuster Morell The Wikimedia Foundation and the Governance of Wikipedia’s Infrastructure: Historical Trajectories and its Hybrid Character 325 Christian Stegbauer and Morgan Currie Cultural Transformations in Wikipedia – or ‘From Emancipation to Product Ideology’. An interview with Christian Stegbauer 342 Shun-ling Chen The Wikimedia Foundation and the Self-governing Wikipedia Community: A Dynamic Relationship Under Constant Negotiation 351 APPENDICES CPOV Conferences 372 ‘WikiWars’ Conference I in Bangaore CPOV Conference II in Amsterdam CPOV Conference III in Leipzig Author Biographies 379 8 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader INTRODUCTION 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION THE ‘C’ IN CPOV There are always many threads that lead up to a collaborative project. We would like to men- tion a few meetings and conversations. Geert’s interest in critical Wikipedia research started GEERT LOVINK AND NaTHANIEL TKACZ in late 2007 when he gave his first talk on the matter at the Dutch national meeting of pub- lic libraries. Almost a year later he discussed his interest in Paris with French philosopher Gérard Wormser, who said we should look into analogies between Wikipedia and efforts of the 18th century encyclopedians. In January 2011, while wrapping up this publication, Wikipedia turned ten. It was a moment to pause and take stock of
Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Orthographic Information in Machine Translation 3

    A Survey of Orthographic Information in Machine Translation 3

    Machine Translation Journal manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A Survey of Orthographic Information in Machine Translation Bharathi Raja Chakravarthi1 ⋅ Priya Rani 1 ⋅ Mihael Arcan2 ⋅ John P. McCrae 1 the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract Machine translation is one of the applications of natural language process- ing which has been explored in different languages. Recently researchers started pay- ing attention towards machine translation for resource-poor languages and closely related languages. A widespread and underlying problem for these machine transla- tion systems is the variation in orthographic conventions which causes many issues to traditional approaches. Two languages written in two different orthographies are not easily comparable, but orthographic information can also be used to improve the machine translation system. This article offers a survey of research regarding orthog- raphy’s influence on machine translation of under-resourced languages. It introduces under-resourced languages in terms of machine translation and how orthographic in- formation can be utilised to improve machine translation. We describe previous work in this area, discussing what underlying assumptions were made, and showing how orthographic knowledge improves the performance of machine translation of under- resourced languages. We discuss different types of machine translation and demon- strate a recent trend that seeks to link orthographic information with well-established machine translation methods. Considerable attention is given to current efforts of cog- nates information at different levels of machine translation and the lessons that can Bharathi Raja Chakravarthi [email protected] Priya Rani [email protected] Mihael Arcan [email protected] John P.
  • Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance

    Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance

    Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance Andrea Forte1, Vanessa Larco2 and Amy Bruckman1 1GVU Center, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology {aforte, asb}@cc.gatech.edu 2Microsoft [email protected] This is a preprint version of the journal article: Forte, Andrea, Vanessa Larco and Amy Bruckman. (2009) Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 26(1) pp 49-72. Publisher: M.E. Sharp www.mesharpe.com/journals.asp Abstract How does “self-governance” happen in Wikipedia? Through in-depth interviews with twenty individuals who have held a variety of responsibilities in the English-language Wikipedia, we obtained rich descriptions of how various forces produce and regulate social structures on the site. Our analysis describes Wikipedia as an organization with highly refined policies, norms, and a technological architecture that supports organizational ideals of consensus building and discussion. We describe how governance on the site is becoming increasingly decentralized as the community grows and how this is predicted by theories of commons-based governance developed in offline contexts. We also briefly examine local governance structures called WikiProjects through the example of WikiProject Military History, one of the oldest and most prolific projects on the site. 1. The Mechanisms of Self-Organization Should a picture of a big, hairy tarantula appear in an encyclopedia article about arachnophobia? Does it illustrate the point, or just frighten potential readers? Reasonable people might disagree on this question. In a freely editable site like Wikipedia, anyone can add the photo, and someone else can remove it. And someone can add it back, and the process continues.
  • Wikipedia Edit-A-Thons and Editor Experience: Lessons from a Participatory Observation

    Wikipedia Edit-A-Thons and Editor Experience: Lessons from a Participatory Observation

    Aalborg Universitet Wikipedia Edit-a-thons and Editor Experience: Lessons from a Participatory Observation Gluza, Wioletta; Turaj, Izabela ; Meier, Florian Maximilian Published in: Proceeding of 17th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym2021) Publication date: 2021 Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Gluza, W., Turaj, I., & Meier, F. M. (Accepted/In press). Wikipedia Edit-a-thons and Editor Experience: Lessons from a Participatory Observation. In Proceeding of 17th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym2021) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Wikipedia Edit-a-thons and Editor Experience: Lessons from a Participatory Observation WIOLETTA GLUZA, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark IZABELA ANNA TURAJ, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark FLORIAN MEIER, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark Wikipedia is one of the most important sources of encyclopedic knowledge and among the most visited websites on the internet.
  • Community and Communication

    Community and Communication

    Community and 12 Communication A large, diverse, and thriving group of volun- teers produces encyclopedia articles and administers Wikipedia. Over time, members of the Wikipedia community have developed conventions for interacting with each other, processes for managing content, and policies for minimizing disruptions and maximizing use- ful work. In this chapter, we’ll discuss where to find other contributors and how to ask for help with any topic. We’ll also explain ways in which community members interact with each other. Though most discussion occurs on talk pages, Wikipedia has some central community forums for debate about the site’s larger policies and more specific issues. We’ll also talk about the make-up of the community. First, however, we’ll outline aspects of Wikipedia’s shared culture, from key philosophies about how contributors How Wikipedia Works (C) 2008 by Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates should interact with each other to some long-running points of debate to some friendly practices that have arisen over time. Although explicit site policies cover content guidelines and social norms, informal philosophies and practices help keep the Wikipedia community of contributors together. Wikipedia’s Culture Wikipedia’s community has grown spontaneously and organically—a recipe for a baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references. But core tenets of the wiki way, like Assume Good Faith and Please Don’t Bite the Newcomers, have been with the community since the beginning. Assumptions on Arrival Wikipedians try to treat new editors well. Assume Good Faith (AGF) is a funda- mental philosophy, as well as an official guideline (shortcut WP:AGF) on Wikipedia.
  • Full Circle Magazine #63 1 Full Circle Magazine Is Neither Affiliated With, Nor Endorsed By, Canonical Ltd

    Full Circle Magazine #63 1 Full Circle Magazine Is Neither Affiliated With, Nor Endorsed By, Canonical Ltd

    Full Circle THE INDEPENDENT MAGAZINE FOR THE UBUNTU LINUX COMMUNITY WEB DEV ISSUE #63 - July 2012 LAMP & WEB DEVELOPMENT ) m o c . r k c i l F ( e u S : o t o h P RREEDDUUCCEE **BBUUNNTTUU BBOOOOTT TTIIMMEE WWIITTHH TTHHIISS IINN DDEEPPTTHH AARRTTIICCLLEE.. WWIITTHH GGRRAAPPHHSS!! full circle magazine #63 1 Full Circle Magazine is neither affiliated with, nor endorsed by, Canonical Ltd. contents ^ HowTo Full Circle Opinions THE INDEPENDENT MAGAZINE FOR THE UBUNTU LINUX COMMUNITY My Story p.39 Python - Part 34 p.07 Columns LibreOffice - Part 15 p.11 Command & Conquer p.05 Audio Flux p.52 My Opinion p.41 Amateur Astronomy - Pt1 p.14 Ask The New Guy p.26 Ubuntu Games p.54 Review p.44 Letters p.46 GIMP - Beanstalk Pt3 p.17 Linux Labs p.29 Q&A p.49 Inkscape - Part 2 p.19 Ubuntu Women p.53 Closing Windows p.36 Web Dev - Pt1 p.22 Graphics Web Dev The articles contained in this magazine are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. This means you can adapt, copy, distribute and transmit the articles but only under the following conditions: you must attribute the work to the original author in some way (at least a name, email or URL) and to this magazine by name ('Full Circle Magazine') and the URL www.fullcirclemagazine.org (but not attribute the article(s) in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute the resulting work under the same, similar or a compatible license.
  • A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages

    A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages

    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 2373–2380 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages Dwaipayan Roy, Sumit Bhatia, Prateek Jain GESIS - Cologne, IBM Research - Delhi, IIIT - Delhi [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Wikipedia is the largest web-based open encyclopedia covering more than three hundred languages. However, different language editions of Wikipedia differ significantly in terms of their information coverage. We present a systematic comparison of information coverage in English Wikipedia (most exhaustive) and Wikipedias in eight other widely spoken languages (Arabic, German, Hindi, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish). We analyze the content present in the respective Wikipedias in terms of the coverage of topics as well as the depth of coverage of topics included in these Wikipedias. Our analysis quantifies and provides useful insights about the information gap that exists between different language editions of Wikipedia and offers a roadmap for the Information Retrieval (IR) community to bridge this gap. Keywords: Wikipedia, Knowledge base, Information gap 1. Introduction other with respect to the coverage of topics as well as Wikipedia is the largest web-based encyclopedia covering the amount of information about overlapping topics.
  • Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia

    Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia

    information Article Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia Włodzimierz Lewoniewski * , Krzysztof W˛ecel and Witold Abramowicz Department of Information Systems, Pozna´nUniversity of Economics and Business, 61-875 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (W.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 13 May 2020 Abstract: One of the most important factors impacting quality of content in Wikipedia is presence of reliable sources. By following references, readers can verify facts or find more details about described topic. A Wikipedia article can be edited independently in any of over 300 languages, even by anonymous users, therefore information about the same topic may be inconsistent. This also applies to use of references in different language versions of a particular article, so the same statement can have different sources. In this paper we analyzed over 40 million articles from the 55 most developed language versions of Wikipedia to extract information about over 200 million references and find the most popular and reliable sources. We presented 10 models for the assessment of the popularity and reliability of the sources based on analysis of meta information about the references in Wikipedia articles, page views and authors of the articles. Using DBpedia and Wikidata we automatically identified the alignment of the sources to a specific domain. Additionally, we analyzed the changes of popularity and reliability in time and identified growth leaders in each of the considered months. The results can be used for quality improvements of the content in different languages versions of Wikipedia.
  • Multilingual Ranking of Wikipedia Articles with Quality and Popularity Assessment in Different Topics

    Multilingual Ranking of Wikipedia Articles with Quality and Popularity Assessment in Different Topics

    computers Article Multilingual Ranking of Wikipedia Articles with Quality and Popularity Assessment in Different Topics Włodzimierz Lewoniewski * , Krzysztof W˛ecel and Witold Abramowicz Department of Information Systems, Pozna´nUniversity of Economics and Business, 61-875 Pozna´n,Poland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-(61)-639-27-93 Received: 10 May 2019; Accepted: 13 August 2019; Published: 14 August 2019 Abstract: On Wikipedia, articles about various topics can be created and edited independently in each language version. Therefore, the quality of information about the same topic depends on the language. Any interested user can improve an article and that improvement may depend on the popularity of the article. The goal of this study is to show what topics are best represented in different language versions of Wikipedia using results of quality assessment for over 39 million articles in 55 languages. In this paper, we also analyze how popular selected topics are among readers and authors in various languages. We used two approaches to assign articles to various topics. First, we selected 27 main multilingual categories and analyzed all their connections with sub-categories based on information extracted from over 10 million categories in 55 language versions. To classify the articles to one of the 27 main categories, we took into account over 400 million links from articles to over 10 million categories and over 26 million links between categories. In the second approach, we used data from DBpedia and Wikidata. We also showed how the results of the study can be used to build local and global rankings of the Wikipedia content.
  • The Culture of Wikipedia

    The Culture of Wikipedia

    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
  • The CIA and Art

    The CIA and Art

    return to updates The CIA and Art by Miles Mathis Since this is a review, all images here are reproduced under the fair use doctrine of the US. The clothing photographs were taken from Urban Outfitters website, where you can purchase this clothing if it appeals to you. Some of my art readers will think I have gone offtrack over the past few years, writing less about art and more about politics. Although it is true I have done that, I wouldn't say it is offtrack. It is just further along the track than most have traveled, and further along than many wish to go. I understand that. I understand that many got off long ago, and I understand why. We all do what we have to do. But if you are still with me on this ride, we will see today that I am ontrack. I will prove it by showing how the tracks of art and politics collide. The collision we will see today isn't the normal collision we are used to, where art and politics are mashed together to create some fake relevance. We won't see art and politics colliding in order to make a sale or manufacture a market. We will go a step deeper than that: another level down the rabbithole. For when the CIA gets involved, it doesn't get involved mainly to make money. In this case, it gets involved to mess with your mind. I was led to this paper when I had the recent misfortune to visit an Urban Outfitters.
  • Made in China: Implications of Authorship and Historical Studio Practices on Modern Chinese Art

    Made in China: Implications of Authorship and Historical Studio Practices on Modern Chinese Art

    This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, East Asian Studies Stanford University Made in China: Implications of Authorship and Historical Studio Practices on Modern Chinese Art by Allison Rath August 21, 2016 Advisor: Professor Richard Vinograd Department: Art History Approval Signature: ___________________________________ Date: ___________________________________ When his exhibition at the Royal Academy of the Arts opened in January 2012, David Hockney made certain that the promotional materials for the show included the phrase, “All the works here were made by the artist himself, personally.”1 Hockney’s words marked a not-so-subtle jab at the growing number of artists, including international superstars like Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst, who unabashedly allocate the majority, if not entirety, of the facture of their projects to their assistants. Though many artists might require the aid of assistants to realize monumental installations for practical reasons of size or quantity, there is a distinction to be drawn between practical use of outside aid and wholesale delegation. Debates over the amount of skill and personal involvement required on the part of the “creator” artist have become commonplace within art historical discourse and critical writing and can be traced throughout thousands of years of art history in the East and the West. Such debates have antecedents in discussions of late 20th century Conceptual art, and even deeper historical roots investigations of workshop or studio practices by artist-entrepreneurs such as Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640). While Hirst openly acknowledges that he lacks the technical skill, time, and desire to paint his own works,2 he also notes the irony of the value ascribed to them.
  • RASLAN 2017 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing

    RASLAN 2017 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing

    RASLAN 2017 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing A. Horák, P. Rychlý, A. Rambousek (Eds.) RASLAN 2017 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing Eleventh Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2017 Karlova Studánka, Czech Republic, December 1–3, 2017 Proceedings Tribun EU 2017 Proceedings Editors Aleš Horák Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Pavel Rychlý Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Adam Rambousek Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Czech Copyright Law, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Tribun EU. Violations are liable for prosecution under the Czech Copyright Law. Editors © Aleš Horák, 2017; Pavel Rychlý, 2017; Adam Rambousek, 2017 Typography © Adam Rambousek, 2017 Cover © Petr Sojka, 2010 This edition © Tribun EU, Brno, 2017 ISBN 978-80-263-1340-3 ISSN 2336-4289 Preface This volume contains the Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing (RASLAN 2017) held on December 1st–3rd 2017 in Karlova Studánka, Sporthotel Kurzovní, Jeseníky, Czech Republic.