DOCSLIB.ORG

Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. the Case of Wikipedia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. the Case of Wikipedia Genre analysis online encycloped The case of Wikipedia AnnaTereszkiewicz Genre analysis of online encyclopedias The case of Wikipedia Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Publikacja dofi nansowana przez Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego ze środków wydziałowej rezerwy badań własnych oraz Instytutu Filologii Angielskiej PROJEKT OKŁADKI Bartłomiej Drosdziok Zdjęcie na okładce: Łukasz Stawarski © Copyright by Anna Tereszkiewicz & Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Wydanie I, Kraków 2010 All rights reserved Książka, ani żaden jej fragment nie może być przedrukowywana bez pisemnej zgody Wydawcy. W sprawie zezwoleń na przedruk należy zwracać się do Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. ISBN 978-83-233-2813-1 www.wuj.pl Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Redakcja: ul. Michałowskiego 9/2, 31-126 Kraków tel. 12-631-18-81, 12-631-18-82, fax 12-631-18-83 Dystrybucja: tel. 12-631-01-97, tel./fax 12-631-01-98 tel. kom. 0506-006-674, e-mail: [email protected] Konto: PEKAO SA, nr 80 1240 4722 1111 0000 4856 3325 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................................. 14 1. Genology as a study ................................................................................................................... 15 1.1. Schools of genre analysis ...................................................................................................... 15 1.2. Genre – characteristics of the concept .................................................................................. 16 1.3. Genre evolution ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.4. Discourse and genre competence .......................................................................................... 18 5 1.4.1 Discourse competence ...................................................................................................... 18 1.4.2 Generic competence ......................................................................................................... 19 2. Genres on the web ...................................................................................................................... 21 2.1. Genre theory on the web ....................................................................................................... 21 2.2. The concept of web genre ..................................................................................................... 22 2.3. Genres on the web – taxonomy ............................................................................................. 23 2.4. Genre hybridization and individualization ............................................................................ 26 2.5. Web genre evolution ............................................................................................................. 27 3. Encyclopedia as a genre ............................................................................................................. 29 3.1. Encyclopedia as a genre of information ................................................................................ 29 3.2. Genre characteristics of an encyclopedia .............................................................................. 30 3.2.1. Function ........................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2. Content ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.2.2.1. Authorship ................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.2.2. Scope ......................................................................................................................... 33 3.2.2.3. Adjuncts ..................................................................................................................... 34 3.2.3. Form ................................................................................................................................ 35 3.2.3.1. Density ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.2.3.2. Article structure ......................................................................................................... 35 3.2.3.3. Classifi cation ............................................................................................................ 35 3.2.3.4. Cross-references ........................................................................................................ 37 3.2.3.5. Discourse properties .................................................................................................. 38 4. Encyclopedias on the web .......................................................................................................... 41 4.1. Online reference works ......................................................................................................... 41 4.2. Typology of online encyclopedias ........................................................................................ 42 4.2.1. Reproduced encyclopedias .............................................................................................. 43 4.2.2. Adapted encyclopedias .................................................................................................... 45 4.2.2.1. Lower adapted encyclopedias .................................................................................... 45 4.2.2.2 Advanced encyclopedias ............................................................................................. 47 4.3. Emergent encyclopedias ....................................................................................................... 51 4.3.1. User-created portals ......................................................................................................... 51 4.3.2. Resource pages ................................................................................................................ 57 4.4. Emerging encyclopedias ...................................................................................................... 59 5. Wikipedia as a genre .................................................................................................................. 65 5.1. Wikipedia – introduction to the project ................................................................................ 66 5.1.1. Wikipedia mechanism ..................................................................................................... 66 5.1.2. Dimensions of the project ............................................................................................... 67 5.1.3. Legal issues ..................................................................................................................... 69 5.2. Wikipedia versus traditional encyclopedia ........................................................................... 69 5.2.1. Function of Wikipedia ..................................................................................................... 70 5.2.2. Content ............................................................................................................................ 70 5.2.2.1. Authorship ................................................................................................................. 70 5.2.2.1.1. Wikipedia community .......................................................................................... 72 5.2.2.2. Scope ......................................................................................................................... 73 5.2.2.3. Adjuncts ..................................................................................................................... 74 5.2.2.4. Genre syncretism ....................................................................................................... 81 5.2.3. Form ................................................................................................................................ 82 6 5.2.3.1. Density .................................................................................................................... 82 5.2.3.2. Article structure ....................................................................................................... 82 5.2.3.3. Classifi cation ........................................................................................................... 87 5.2.3.4. Cross-references ...................................................................................................... 90 5.2.4. Functionality ................................................................................................................. 92 5.2.5. Meeting the quality standards ....................................................................................... 94 6. Wikipedia discourse features .................................................................................................... 99 6.1. The continuum of Wikientries..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latvian Sportspeople Representation in English and Latvian Wikipedias
    32 | Rudzinska: LATVIAN SPORTSPEOPLE REPRESENTATION ... ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER LATVIAN SPORTSPEOPLE REPRESENTATION IN ENGLISH AND LATVIAN WIKIPEDIAS Ieva Rudzinska Latvian Academy of Sport Education Address: 333 Brivibas Street, Riga, LV-1006, Latvia Phone: 37167543445, fax: +37167543480 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The goal was to study Latvian sportspeople representation in English and Latvian Wikipedias in 2015. The analyses allowed identifying three main Latvian sportspeople related categories in English Wikipedia: “Latvian sportspeople”, “List of Latvian sportspeople” and “Latvian sports related lists”, a category “Latvijas sportisti” in Latvian Wikipedia. In “Latvian sportspeople” 1018 sportspeople were listed by family names, starting with Artis Ābols and ending with Ainārs Zvirgzdiņš, by sports – from Latvian alpine skiers to Latvian weightlifters. In “List of Latvian sportspeople” were included 99 most notable Latvian sportspeople, representing 24 sports. The largest athlete frequency per sport (14) was in 3 sports: athletics, basketball and luge. From 5 to 10 sportspeople were in 6 sports: rowing, bobsleigh, volleyball, ice hockey, judo and tennis, 15 sports were represented by 1 to 4 athletes. In Latvian Wikipedia in the category “Latvijas sportisti” were 1186 sportspeople from 38 sports. Statistical analysis allowed finding moderate Pearson correlations between the numbers of sportspeople in the category “Latvian sportspeople” and “List of Latvian sportspeople”, EN (0.60; Sig.<0.01); “List of Latvian sportspeople”,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Wikipedia: an Effective Anarchy Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D
    Wikipedia: An Effective Anarchy Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D. Kozminski University [email protected] Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology conference in Baltimore, MD (USA), 27-31 March, 2012 (work in progress) This paper is the first report from a virtual ethnographic study (Hine, 2000; Kozinets, 2010) of Wikipedia community conducted 2006-2012, by the use of participative methods, and relying on an narrative analysis of Wikipedia organization (Czarniawska, 2000; Boje, 2001; Jemielniak & Kostera, 2010). It serves as a general introduction to Wikipedia community, and is also a basis for a discussion of a book in progress, which is going to address the topic. Contrarily to a common misconception, Wikipedia was not the first “wiki” in the world. “Wiki” (originated from Hawaiian word for “quick” or “fast”, and named after “Wiki Wiki Shuttle” on Honolulu International Airport) is a website technology based on a philosophy of tracking changes added by the users, with a simplified markup language (allowing easy additions of, e.g. bold, italics, or tables, without the need to learn full HTML syntax), and was originally created and made public in 1995 by Ward Cunningam, as WikiWikiWeb. WikiWikiWeb was an attractive choice among enterprises and was used for communication, collaborative ideas development, documentation, intranet, knowledge management, etc. It grew steadily in popularity, when Jimmy “Jimbo” Wales, then the CEO of Bomis Inc., started up his encyclopedic project in 2000: Nupedia. Nupedia was meant to be an online encyclopedia, with free content, and written by experts. In an attempt to meet the standards set by professional encyclopedias, the creators of Nupedia based it on a peer-review process, and not a wiki-type software.
    [Show full text]
  • MA in Human Rights Practice (Online Only)
    NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM – IMPLEMENTATION REQUEST I. PROGRAM NAME, DESCRIPTION AND CIP CODE A. PROPOSED PROGRAM NAME AND DEGREE(S) TO BE OFFERED – for PhD programs indicate whether a terminal Master’s degree will also be offered. MA in Human Rights Practice (Online only) B. CIP CODE – go to the National Statistics for Education web site (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/browse.aspx?y=55) to select an appropriate CIP Code or contact Pam Coonan (621-0950) [email protected] for assistance. 30.9999 Multi-/Interdisciplinary Studies, Other. C. DEPARTMENT/UNIT AND COLLEGE – indicate the managing dept/unit and college for multi- interdisciplinary programs with multiple participating units/colleges. College of Social & Behavioral Sciences D. Campus and Location Offering – indicate on which campus(es) and at which location(s) this program will be offered (check all that apply). Degree is wholly online II. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF PROGRAM–Please describe the purpose and nature of your program and explain the ways in which it is similar to and different from similar programs at two public peer institutions. Please use the attached comparison chart to assist you. The MA in Human Rights Practice provides online graduate-level education for human rights workers, government personnel, and professionals from around the globe seeking to further their education in the area of human rights. It will also appeal to recent undergraduate students from the US and abroad with strong interests in studying social justice and human rights. The hallmarks of the proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Themes in Focus: Europe Can Only Exist If There Is a Spirit of Partnership
    IN FOCUS Aontaithe san éagsúlacht United in diversity Aontaithe san éagsúlacht EUROPE THEMES IN FOCUS: Europe can only exist if there is a spirit of partnership. But its principal partners are still struggling to find sustainable European answers to key issues. INTERVIEW: Angela Filote, Head of the EU Commission Representation in Romania OVERVIEW: Examples of GIZ’s work FIGURES: Europe – destination for migrants, springboard for energy reforms IN FOCUS Unfinished agenda Europe is both the world’s biggest peace project and a work in progress. As the conflicts in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria and Mali demonstrate, Europe’s member states must work together if they are to survive in a globalised world. This is the very reason why the idea of European unity needs to be revamped. Text Dietrich Alexander urt Tucholsky, one of the leading political But General von Clausewitz would no doubt have been commentators of the Weimar Republic, took astounded by the Europe we know today and cherished the Old Continent to task when he wrote the progress achieved. that in Europe only crime and capitalism are In this free, united and prosperous Europe each indi- Korganised between states. vidual citizen has too much to lose. Europe is only latent- The outlook is not quite that bad in 2014. There is ly susceptible to criminal ideologies. It has risen from the hope, even a sense of well-founded optimism. ‘In Europe rubble and bitterness left in the aftermath of the two most there is room for a dream,’ said the newly elected Presi- devastating wars in the history of mankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling User Reputation in Wikipedia
    Modeling User Reputation in Wikis Sara Javanmardi, Cristina Lopes and Pierre Baldi Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA {sjavanma,lopes,pfbaldi}@ics.uci.edu Abstract Collaborative systems available on the Web allow millions of users to share information through a growing collection of tools and platforms such as wikis, blogs, and shared forums. By their very nature, these systems contain resources and information with different quality levels. The open na- ture of these systems, however, makes it difficult for users to determine the quality of the available information and the reputation of its providers. Here, we first parse and mine the entire English Wikipedia history pages in order to extract detailed user edit patterns and statistics. We then use these patterns and statistics to derive three computational models of a user’s reputation. Finally, we validate these models using ground–truth Wikipedia data associated with vandals and adminis- trators. When used as a classifier, the best model produces an area under the ROC curve of 0.98. Furthermore, we assess the reputation predictions generated by the models on other users, and show that all three models can be used efficiently for predicting user behavior in Wikipedia. Keywords: Wiki, Reputation, Reliability, Wiki Mining, Wikipedia, Web 2.0 1 Introduction The last few years have seen a substantial growth in user–generated Web content. Simple editing interfaces encourage users to create and maintain repositories of shared content. Online information repositories such as wikis, forums and blogs have increased the participation of the general public in the production of web content through the notion of social software [1, 2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 2373–2380 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC A Topic-Aligned Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Articles for Studying Information Asymmetry in Low Resource Languages Dwaipayan Roy, Sumit Bhatia, Prateek Jain GESIS - Cologne, IBM Research - Delhi, IIIT - Delhi [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Wikipedia is the largest web-based open encyclopedia covering more than three hundred languages. However, different language editions of Wikipedia differ significantly in terms of their information coverage. We present a systematic comparison of information coverage in English Wikipedia (most exhaustive) and Wikipedias in eight other widely spoken languages (Arabic, German, Hindi, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish). We analyze the content present in the respective Wikipedias in terms of the coverage of topics as well as the depth of coverage of topics included in these Wikipedias. Our analysis quantifies and provides useful insights about the information gap that exists between different language editions of Wikipedia and offers a roadmap for the Information Retrieval (IR) community to bridge this gap. Keywords: Wikipedia, Knowledge base, Information gap 1. Introduction other with respect to the coverage of topics as well as Wikipedia is the largest web-based encyclopedia covering the amount of information about overlapping topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia
    information Article Modeling Popularity and Reliability of Sources in Multilingual Wikipedia Włodzimierz Lewoniewski * , Krzysztof W˛ecel and Witold Abramowicz Department of Information Systems, Pozna´nUniversity of Economics and Business, 61-875 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (K.W.); [email protected] (W.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 13 May 2020 Abstract: One of the most important factors impacting quality of content in Wikipedia is presence of reliable sources. By following references, readers can verify facts or find more details about described topic. A Wikipedia article can be edited independently in any of over 300 languages, even by anonymous users, therefore information about the same topic may be inconsistent. This also applies to use of references in different language versions of a particular article, so the same statement can have different sources. In this paper we analyzed over 40 million articles from the 55 most developed language versions of Wikipedia to extract information about over 200 million references and find the most popular and reliable sources. We presented 10 models for the assessment of the popularity and reliability of the sources based on analysis of meta information about the references in Wikipedia articles, page views and authors of the articles. Using DBpedia and Wikidata we automatically identified the alignment of the sources to a specific domain. Additionally, we analyzed the changes of popularity and reliability in time and identified growth leaders in each of the considered months. The results can be used for quality improvements of the content in different languages versions of Wikipedia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Anyone Can Edit', Not Everyone Does: Wikipedia and the Gender
    Heather Ford and Judy Wajcman ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Ford, Heather and Wajcman, Judy (2017) ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap. Social Studies of Science, 47 (4). pp. 511-527. ISSN 0306-3127 DOI: 10.1177/0306312717692172 © 2017 The Authors This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68675/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Anyone can edit, not everyone does: Wikipedias infrastructure and the gender gap Heather Ford School of Media and Communication, University of Leeds, UK Judy Wajcman Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, UK Abstract Feminist STS has continues to define what counts as knowledge and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Wir Feiern in Berlin!
    33 2017 DER 10. CDN-GEBURTSTAG WIR FEIERN IN BERLIN! AUF DEM WEG PHILIPP LAHMS „FÜR MICH WIE ZUM 5. STERN NÄCHSTE MISSION EIN LOTTOGEWINN“ DIE MANNSCHAFT blieb 2017 Ehrenspielführer und Serie: Hans Siemensmeyer unbesiegt und geht als Nr. 1 deutscher EM-Botschafter über sein bemerkenswertes der Weltrangliste ins WM-Jahr 10 für die EURO 2024 16 Debüt für Deutschland 30 INHALT 2 CDN-MAGAZIN 33 | 2017 6 Berlin Auf geht’s zur Nacht des großen Wiedersehens 10 Auf zum 5. Stern DIE MANNSCHAFT blieb 2017 unbesiegt und geht als Nr. 1 der Weltrangliste ins WM-Jahr 16 Neues Leben Neue Aufgaben Als Botschafter der Bewerbung um die Ausrichtung der EURO 2024 wird Lahm das Gesicht der deutschen Kampagne INHALT CDN-MAGAZIN 33 | 2017 3 30 „Das war für mich wie ein Lottogewinn“ Zwei Tore zum Einstand im Nationalteam EDITORIAL Von Szymaniak bis Kroos – Vom Profi zum „Pauker“ ein Überblick über die AUS DER KÖNIGS- Uwe Seelers Bilanz und Ausblick auf Nationalspieler im Ausland KLASSE INS den 10. Geburtstag des Clubs der IM AUSLAND GEREIFT 18 KLASSENZIMMER 38 Nationalspieler „ DER CDN – EINE EINHEIT OHNE STANDESDÜNKEL“ 4 VOR 25 JAHREN WEIHNACHTSTOURNEEN DER DDR-AUSWAHL Vor 25 Jahren starb Ernst Happel INSIDE CDN „ BIS HEUTE Weihnachten im Kreis der Familie – WEGWEISEND“ 22 in den 60er-Jahren war das für DDR- Nach 2010 kommen die Mitglieder Nationalspieler eher Ausnahme des CdN wieder im Berliner WEIHNACHTEN Olympiastadion zusammen VOR 50 JAHREN ZWISCHEN BERLIN, BERLIN, FERNWEH & HEIMWEH 42 WIR FEIERN IN BERLIN 6 Ein einziges Mal scheiterte Deutschland schon im Rahmen des Qualifikationswettbewerbs INSIDE CDN AKTUELL IM BLICKPUNKT DER ALBTRAUM VON ALBANIEN 26 Hervorragende Beteiligung beim 2017 – eins der erfolgreichsten regionalen CdN-Treffen in Köln – Jahre der DFB-Historie unvergessen: AUF ZUM 5.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema of the Social: Stars, Fans and the Standardization of Genre in Tamil Cinema
    Western University Scholarship@Western Digitized Theses Digitized Special Collections 2011 CINEMA OF THE SOCIAL: STARS, FANS AND THE STANDARDIZATION OF GENRE IN TAMIL CINEMA Ganga Rudraiah Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses Recommended Citation Rudraiah, Ganga, "CINEMA OF THE SOCIAL: STARS, FANS AND THE STANDARDIZATION OF GENRE IN TAMIL CINEMA" (2011). Digitized Theses. 3315. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/3315 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Special Collections at Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digitized Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CINEMA OF THE SOCIAL: STARS, FANS AND THE STANDARDIZATION OF GENRE IN TAMIL CINEMA r , ' (Spine title: CINEMA OF THE SOCIAL) (Thesis Format: Monograph) by : Ganga Rudraiah Graduate Program in Film Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Ganga Rudraiah 2011 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO SCHOOL OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION r Supervisor Examiners Dr. Christopher E. Glttings Dr. James Prakash Younger Supervisory Committee Dr. Constanza Burucúa Dr. Chris Holmlund The thesis by Ganga Rudraiah entitled: Cinema of the Social: Stars, Fans and the Standardization of Genre in Tamil Cinema is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Date Chair of the Thesis Examination Board Abstract The star machinery of Tamil cinema presents itself as a nearly unfathomable system that produces stars and politicians out of actors and fans out of audiences in an organized fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • D2.8 GLAM-Wiki Collaboration Progress Report 2
    Project Acronym: Europeana Sounds Grant Agreement no: 620591 Project Title: Europeana Sounds D2.8 GLAM-Wiki Collaboration Progress Report 2 Revision: Final Date: 30/11/2016 Authors: Brigitte Jansen and Harry van Biessum, NISV Abstract: Within the Europeana Sounds GLAM-wiki collaboration task, nine edit-a-thons were organised by seven project partners. These edit-a-thons were held in Italy, Denmark, Latvia, England, Greece, France and the Netherlands. This report documents each event, the outcomes and lessons learned during this task. Dissemination level Public X Confidential, only for the members of the Consortium and Commission Services Coordinated by the British Library, the Europeana Sounds project is co-funded by the European Union, through the ICT Policy Support Programme as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/ict_psp/ Europeana Sounds EC-GA 620591 EuropeanaSounds-D2.8-GLAM-wiki-collaboration-progress-report-2-v1.0.docx 30/11/2016 PUBLIC Revision history Version Status Name, organisation Date Changes 0.1 ToC Brigitte Jansen & Harry 14/10/2016 van Biessum, NISV 0.2 Draft Brigitte Jansen & Harry 04/11/2016 First draft van Biessum, NISV 0.3 Draft Zane Grosa, NLL 09/10/2016 Chapter 3.5 0.4 Draft Laura Miles, BL 15/11/2016 Chapters 3.4, 3.8, 5.1, 7 0.5 Draft Karen Williams, State 17/11/2016 Chapters 3.9, 7 and University Library Denmark 0.6 Draft Marianna Anastasiou, 17/11/2016 Chapter 3.6 FMS 0.7 Draft Brigitte Jansen, Maarten 18/11/2016 Incorporating feedback by Brinkerink & Harry van reviewer and Europeana Biessum, NISV Sounds partner 0.8 Draft David Haskiya, EF 28/11/2016 Added Chapter 3.2.2 0.9 Final draft Maarten Brinkerink & 28/11/2016 Finalise all chapters Harry van Biessum, NISV 1.0 Final Laura Miles & Richard 30/11/2016 Layout, minor changes Ranft, BL Review and approval Action Name, organisation Date Sindy Meijer, Wikimedia Chapter Netherland 16/11/2016 Reviewed by Liam Wyatt, EF 24/11/2016 Approved by Coordinator and PMB 30/11/2016 Distribution No.
    [Show full text]