DOCSLIB.ORG

2019A Fixed-Rate Refunding Bonds, Due August 1, 2040

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: S&P: “AAA” Fitch: “AAA” See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California (“Bond Counsel”), under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, the interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, the interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $118,090,000 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover The Rancho California Water District Financing Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing its $118,090,000 Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2019A (the “Bonds”), pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 2019 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Authority and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”). A portion of the proceeds of the Bonds, together with certain amounts transferred from the Rancho California Water District (the “District”), will be used to: (i) refund and redeem the outstanding principal amount of the Authority’s Fixed Rate Revenue Bonds, Series of 2010A (Federally Taxable Build America Bonds) (the “2010A Bonds”); (ii) refund all of the Authority’s Taxable Fixed Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2016C (the “2016C Bonds”) and redeem certain maturities of the 2016C Bonds, and (iii) pay costs of issuance incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, as more fully described herein. See “PLAN OF FINANCING” herein. The Bonds are special, limited obligations of the Authority payable solely from the Trust Estate (herein defined) and are secured by the Trust Estate, including amounts held in the funds and accounts (other than the Cost of Issuance Fund and the Rebate Fund) established pursuant to the Indenture, subject only to the provisions of the Indenture permitting the application thereof for the purposes and on the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture. The Trust Estate consists primarily of Installment Payments (as defined herein) made by the District to the Authority from Net Revenues (herein defined) pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement (herein defined). See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS” herein. The District’s obligation to pay Installment Payments under the Installment Purchase Agreement with respect to the Bonds is on parity with the District’s obligation to make payments from Net Revenues under other outstanding Parity Obligations (as defined herein). In addition, the District may incur additional obligations payable from and secured by Net Revenues upon satisfying the requirements provided in the Master Agreement (herein defined). See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS” herein. The Bonds will be issued in denominations of $5,000 and any integral multiple thereof. The Bonds will be delivered in fully registered form only, and, when executed and delivered, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their interest in the Bonds purchased. Payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds will be payable by the Trustee to DTC which is obligated in turn to remit such principal, premium, if any, and interest to the DTC Participants for subsequent disbursement to the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds, as more fully described herein. See “THE BONDS— General Provisions” herein and Appendix E—“BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM” attached hereto. The Bonds will bear interest at the rates per annum set forth on the following page until their maturity. Interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2020. See “THE BONDS” herein. The Bonds are subject to redemption, as described herein. See “THE BONDS—Redemption” herein. THE BONDS ARE SPECIAL, LIMITED OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHORITY, PAYABLE FROM, AND SECURED AS TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND INTEREST THEREON, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR TERMS AND THE TERMS OF THE INDENTURE SOLELY BY, THE TRUST ESTATE. THE BONDS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A CHARGE AGAINST THE GENERAL CREDIT OF THE AUTHORITY OR ITS MEMBERS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE AUTHORITY BE OBLIGATED TO PAY PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS, EXCEPT FROM THE TRUST ESTATE. NEITHER THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOR ANY PUBLIC AGENCY (OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY) NOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY IS OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, OR INTEREST ON THE BONDS. NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ANY PUBLIC AGENCY THEREOF OR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, OR INTEREST ON, THE BONDS. THE BONDS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OF THE AUTHORITY, THE DISTRICT, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY DEBT LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. THE OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT TO PAY THE INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS UNDER THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS AN OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT, PAYABLE SOLELY FROM NET REVENUES, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OF THE DISTRICT OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY DEBT LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION. NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE DISTRICT OR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS TO BE MADE PURSUANT TO THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT. This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the Authority, and accepted by the Underwriter, subject to the approval of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, Bond Counsel, and certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Authority and the District by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, Disclosure Counsel, for the Underwriter by its counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, New York, and for the Authority and the District by Best Best & Krieger LLP, San Diego, California. It is anticipated that the Bonds in book-entry form will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC in New York, New York, on or about October 15, 2019. BofA Merrill Lynch Dated: September 17, 2019 MATURITY SCHEDULE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2019A Base CUSIP†: 752111 Maturity Date Principal Interest CUSIP† (August 1) Amount Rate Price Yield Suffix 2020 $1,765,000 5.000% 103.034 1.150% NC4 2021 1,785,000 5.000 106.816 1.150 ND2 2022 1,625,000 5.000 110.526 1.160 NE0 2023 1,635,000 5.000 114.172 1.170 NF7 2024 1,720,000 5.000 117.753 1.180 NG5 2025 1,780,000 5.000 121.145 1.210 NH3 2026 1,845,000 5.000 124.205 1.270 NJ9 2027 1,900,000 5.000 127.170 1.320 NK6 2028 1,970,000 5.000 129.688 1.400 NL4 2029 2,050,000 5.000 132.195 1.460 NM2 2030 335,000 5.000 132.149C 1.600 NN0 2031 350,000 5.000 131.373C 1.670 NP5 2032 6,330,000 5.000 130.821C 1.720 NQ3 2033 6,530,000 5.000 130.163C 1.780 NR1 2034 5,720,000 5.000 129.400C 1.850 NS9 2035 12,205,000 4.000 115.898C 2.260 NT7 2036 12,685,000 4.000 115.501C 2.300 NU4 2037 13,185,000 4.000 115.105C 2.340 NV2 2038 13,705,000 4.000 114.711C 2.380 NW0 2039 14,245,000 4.000 114.318C 2.420 NX8 2040 14,725,000 3.000 101.685C 2.810 NY6 C Priced to the optional redemption date of February 1, 2030, at par. † CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Copyright(c) 2019 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. The Authority, the District and the Underwriter do not take any responsibility for the accuracy of the CUSIP® numbers. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer, solicitation or sale. The information set forth herein has been provided by the Authority and the District and other sources that are believed by the Authority and the District to be reliable.
Recommended publications
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr

    FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr

    FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA Phone: 951-600-7297 Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951) 276-6701 Visit the F70 website for additional information regarding the airport and procedures at www.rcfva.org Federal Aviation Administration FAA Headquarters 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov/contact Feedback is always appreciated at [email protected] INTRODUCTION In response to community interest, this booklet was developed to provide an overview of Airport operations and the complaint process. It will explain how and what aircraft operate in vicinity of F70, their interaction with our neighbors, and how complaints are handled. (F70 is the identifier selected by Federal Aviation Administration for the French Valley Airport. All airports have a three- character identifier; local examples are ONT for Ontario International Airport and LAX for Los Angeles Airport.) AIRPORT HISTORY In the late 1970s, discussion and planning began on relocating the existing Rancho California Airport due, in part, to safety deficiencies. In addition, the airport was leased to the County with the owner not wanting to renew the lease. An evaluation leading to the identification and selection of potential new sites was undertaken in June 1983. In June 1985 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution designating the French Valley site as the replacement site for the existing Rancho California Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration approved the French Valley Airport Layout plan in 1985 and funded four grants for land acquisition. Initial construction of French Valley Airport began in October 1987 and was completed in April 1989.
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final

    FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final

    DRAFT FINAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN for FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Riverside County, California Draft Final Technical Report Prepared by Coffman Associates, Inc. April 2009 “The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49, United States Code, Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.” FRENCH VALLEY TABLE OF CONTENTS A•I•R•P•O•R•T FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final Airport Master Plan INTRODUCTION MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... ii MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS AND PROCESS ................................................. ii COORDINATION .............................................................................................. iv Chapter One INVENTORY REGIONAL SETTING..................................................................................... 1-1 Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 1-2 Climate .................................................................................................. 1-2 Utilities .................................................................................................
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life

    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life

    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
  • Advanced Flight Training Information Catalog

    Advanced Flight Training Information Catalog

    ADVANCED FLIGHT TRAINING INFORMATION CATALOG Airport: French Valley Airport Address: 37600 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite G Murrieta, CA 92563 Telephone: Day and Night: (951) 304-9639 Emergency: (562) 387-8505 Email: [email protected] Website: www.flyefi.coM Services: Flight Training, Aircraft Rental, PSI Testing Facility Approved by the Federal Aviation AdMinistration under FAR Part 141 Issued: June 3, 2020 All materials contained in this bulletin are true and correct and policy. Signature of School Official: Stephanie Bowden 1 INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES AIRPORT French Valley Airport 37600 Sky Canyon Drive Murrieta, CA 92563 French Valley Airport (F70) is the main operations base for flight training. The airport has one hard surface runway and meets the requirements of section 141.38 for day and night flight operations. Fuel services are available from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm daily. TRAINING FACILITIES The school consists of a 2,275 sq. ft. office space located in the French Valley Airport Terminal Building. This training facility is divided into 4 administrative offices, a reception lobby, a 1650 sq. ft. modular training area with a capacity for 20 students and teaching equipment to meet educational needs. Restrooms are located in the main terminal building. Computer testing is done in a dedicated room with (3) testing stations. The testing area is visible through a glass paneled door and is proctored from the front desk. CLASSROOM LAYOUT 2 FLIGHT SCHOOL CALENDAR Enrollment in flight training courses will be permitted on days as stated in paragraph 2 in this section, unless the school elects to close its enrollment for the following reasons: 1.
  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning

    Lockheed P-38 Lightning

    Last updated 1 July 2021 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| LOCKHEED P-38 LIGHTNING |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Considerable confusion exists over civilian P-38 identities. When purchased from military disposals immediately after WWII, the USAAF serial number and Lockheed c/n were quoted on the Bill of Sale. Subsequent research reveals that those sold from Kingman AZ often quoted a mis-matched c/n, probably based a listing that differs from the official company Lockheed number/USAAF serial tie-ups. This dubious c/n was then given to CAA as part of the registration paperwork, and accompanied the aircraft for its civil life. Because P-38s were delivered without a Lockheed manufacturers plate, it can not be easily clarified. 5266 P-38E 41-2048 Lockheed Aircraft Co, Burbank CA 43/46 RP-38E (test aircraft, modified cockpit area) NX91300 Lockheed Aircraft Co, Burbank CA 3.46/54 (test aircraft for Lockheed XF-90 program) N91300 Hycon Aerial Surveys, Ontario CA 8.54/62 (survey conv. at Ontario CA .54: P-38L engines and components, extended survey nose; magnetometer survey ops. in South America) (last FAA inspection 11.57, wfu, open storage Las Vegas NV 59/62) Don M. May, Phoenix AZ 25.6.62 Kucera & Associates, Cleveland OH: not del. 10.62 crashed on takeoff, Phoenix AZ (May k) 24.10.62 ________________________________________________________________________________________ 5757 • P-38F 41-7630 forced landing Greenland, on del. to England 15.7.42 (with 5 other P-38s & B-17: all buried by snow) Pat Epps/ Greenland Expedition Society .81/94 (recov. from under 260 feet of ice .90/92) N5757 Roy Shoffner/ Greenland Expedition Society, Atlanta GA 12.1.94/02 (recov.
  • Southwest Area Plan

    Southwest Area Plan

    Southwest Area Plan Revised: April 16, 2019 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................4 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ................................................................................................5 LOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................6 FEATURES ..........................................................................................................................................................6 SETTING ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 UNIQUE FEATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 11 The Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve .......................................................................................... 11 Vail Lake ................................................................................................................................................... 12 The Cleveland National Forest ................................................................................................................
  • Cfd 16-01 Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 Cfd 18 $42,815,000 $42,815,000P) 100 000% $42,815,000 Total Outstanding Land Secured Bonded Debt $42,815,000

    Cfd 16-01 Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 Cfd 18 $42,815,000 $42,815,000P) 100 000% $42,815,000 Total Outstanding Land Secured Bonded Debt $42,815,000

    NEW ISSUE - BOOK ENTRY ONLY NOT RATED In the opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP, Larkspur, California, Bond Counsel, subject however, to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, interest on the 2017 Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as -amended, but such interest is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the federal alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the 2017 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. See "TAX MATTERS." $42,815,000 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) 2017 SPECIAL TAX BONDS Dated: Date of Issuance Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover The Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), for and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), is issuing the above -captioned bonds (the "2017 Bonds") to (i) prepay a special tax obligation with respect to property in the District, (ii) provide funds to finance public improvements authorized to be funded by the District, (iii) fund a reserve fund for the 2017 Bonds, (iv) pay a portion of the interest due on the 2017 Bonds on September 1, 2017, (v) provide funds for the administration of the District, and (vi) pay costs of issuing the 2017 Bonds.
  • 2017A Fixed-Rate Revenue Bonds

    2017A Fixed-Rate Revenue Bonds

    NEW ISSUES – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: S&P: “AAA” Fitch: “AAA” See “Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California (“Bond Counsel”), under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, the interest (and original issue discount) on the Series of 2017A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, the interest (and original issue discount) on the Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $41,170,000 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY $38,725,000 $2,445,000 Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate Taxable Fixed Rate Revenue Bonds, Series of 2017A Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2017B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover The Rancho California Water District Financing Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing its $38,725,000 Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate Revenue Bonds, Series of 2017A (the “Series of 2017A Bonds”) and $2,445,000 Taxable Fixed Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2017B (the “Series of 2017B Bonds” and, together with the Series of 2017A Bonds, the “Bonds,” and individually, a “Series”), pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of December 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Authority and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”).

  • Division I—Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009

    [House Appropriations Committee Print] Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105; Public Law 111–8) DIVISION I—TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2009 (1941) VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00677 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00678 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING CONTENTS, DIVISION I Page Legislative Text: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 1947 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 1982 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2015 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2019 Explanatory Statement: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 2023 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 2115 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2156 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2158 (1943) VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00679 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00680 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING [CLERK’S NOTE: Five sections which precede division I in the Omnibus Appropriations Act apply to all divisions of the Act, in- cluding this one. The text of these sections is as follows:] SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009’’.

  • Final 2012-2035 RTP/SCS Appendix

    AVIATION AND AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS APPENDIX Southern California Association of Governments ADOPTED APRIL 2012 AVIATION AND AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS Regional Air Passenger Demand Forecast Scenarios for 2012–2035 Re- Regional Aviation Policies and Action Steps 97 gional Transportation Plan 1 Background 97 Background 1 Airport Ground Access Report 100 I. Comparison of Regional Air Passenger Demand Forecasts with Other Recent Forecasts 1 II. Descriptions and Allocations for 2035 Baseline, Low Growth and High Growth Regional Objective of the Study 100 Air Passenger Demand Forecast Scenarios 2 Evolution of the RTP Airport Ground Access Element 101 ATAC Recommendation 4 Updated Airport Demand Forecasts 104 Summary of Projects by Airport 111 Regional Air Cargo Demand Forecast Scenarios for 2012–2035 RTP 5 V. Challenges to Implementing High Occupancy Public Transportation Projects 140 Background 5 VI. Recommendations to Assist Future RTP Updates 141 I. Regional Air Cargo Activity Trends 5 APPENDIX I: Airport and Agency Contacts 144 II. TranSystems 2035 Forecast of Total Regional Air Cargo 7 III. Allocation of Regional Air Cargo to Airports 7 APPENDIX II: High Occupancy Public Transportation and High Speed Rail IV. Revised 2035 Air Cargo Forecasts 8 146 Regional General Aviation Forecast 9 II.1 High Speed Regional Transport System 146 II.2 High Occupancy Public Transportation 148 Introduction 9 References 162 Federal Aviation Forecasts of General Aviation Activity 32 Pilot Cohort Analysis 39 APPENDIX III: Characteristics of a Successful Airport Express Bus 163 Pilot Attrition 40 III.1 Introduction 163 Summary and Conclusions 62 III.2 Air Passenger Threshold for Airport Express Bus Service 164 Forecasts of Active Pilots, Hours Flown and Aircraft Operations 63 Baseline Forecast 63 Summary 72 Forecasts of Based Aircraft and Associated Aircraft Operations 74 Summary and Conclusions 89 References 94 Aviation and Airport Group Access 1 Regional Air Passenger Demand Forecast Average Annual Growth Rates of Alternative Passenger Forecast Scenarios Scenarios for 2012–2035 Regional 1.

  • Community Vulnerability Profiles

    Community Vulnerability Profiles WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Community Vulnerability Profile Page i Table of Contents City of Banning ..................................................................................................................................... Page 1 City of Beaumont ................................................................................................................................. Page 5 City of Calimesa .................................................................................................................................... Page 9 City of Canyon Lake ............................................................................................................................ Page 13 City of Corona .................................................................................................................................... Page 17 City of Eastvale ................................................................................................................................... Page 21 City of Hemet ..................................................................................................................................... Page 25 City of Jurupa Valley ........................................................................................................................... Page 29 City of Lake Elsinore ........................................................................................................................... Page 33 City of Menifee ..................................................................................................................................

  • Section 5.1 Land Use

    General Plan Update Section 5.1 Land Use Regional planning agencies such as the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) recognize that planning issues extend beyond the boundaries of individual cities. Efforts to address regional planning issues such as affordable housing, transportation, and air pollution have resulted in the adoption of regional plans that affect the City of Murrieta. SCAG has evolved as the largest council of governments in the United States, functioning as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for six counties (Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial) and including 184 cities. The region encompasses a population exceeding 15 million persons in an area of more than 38,000 square miles. SCAG has 14 subregional organizations; Murrieta is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The purpose of WRCOG is to unify Western Riverside County agencies to coordinate on the following activities: interagency coordination and planning, regional legislative platform, subregional representation to regional agencies including SCAG, and inter-regional partnership development. In addition, WRCOG addresses regional transportation, community growth and development, and environmental issues. With respect to transportation, WRCOG developed and administers the Western Riverside County’s Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee or TUMF, which ensures that new development pays its fair share for the increased transportation demand it creates. WRCOG is also engaged in transportation issues of regional importance in the areas of goods movement, rail crossings, and growth. As the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Federal government mandates SCAG to research and draw up plans for transportation, growth management, hazardous waste management, and air quality.