DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Vulnerability Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Vulnerability Profiles Community Vulnerability Profiles WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Community Vulnerability Profile Page i Table of Contents City of Banning ..................................................................................................................................... Page 1 City of Beaumont ................................................................................................................................. Page 5 City of Calimesa .................................................................................................................................... Page 9 City of Canyon Lake ............................................................................................................................ Page 13 City of Corona .................................................................................................................................... Page 17 City of Eastvale ................................................................................................................................... Page 21 City of Hemet ..................................................................................................................................... Page 25 City of Jurupa Valley ........................................................................................................................... Page 29 City of Lake Elsinore ........................................................................................................................... Page 33 City of Menifee ................................................................................................................................... Page 37 City of Moreno Valley ........................................................................................................................ Page 41 City of Murrieta .................................................................................................................................. Page 45 City of Norco ...................................................................................................................................... Page 49 City of Perris ....................................................................................................................................... Page 53 City of Riverside ................................................................................................................................. Page 57 City of San Jacinto .............................................................................................................................. Page 61 City of Temecula ................................................................................................................................ Page 65 Unincorporated Western Riverside County ....................................................................................... Page 69 City of Wildomar ................................................................................................................................ Page 75 February 2020 Community Vulnerability Profile Page ii This page is intentionally left blank. Resilient IE Toolkit Community Vulnerability Profile Page 1 City of Banning Executive Summary The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) developed the Regional Climate Adaptation Toolkit for Transportation Infrastructure, “Resilient IE Toolkit,” to support efforts of member agencies to harden their communities against climate‐related hazards. The Resilient IE Toolkit is a collection of resources that provides data on the risk from climate‐related hazards and tools for developing and implementing climate adaptation and resilience strategies to reduce these risks. The Toolkit specifically addresses the increasing risks and impacts of climate‐related hazards anticipated to impact the WRCOG and SBCTA region. This profile provides an overview of the specific vulnerabilities to climate‐related hazards in Banning as discussed in the Resilient IE Toolkit—for more information on other jurisdictions Western Riverside County as a whole, please refer to the Toolkit. This profile was prepared to augment the information provided in the Resilient IE Toolkit and further support climate adaptation planning specific to the city of Banning. This profile is organized to provide a short description of each hazard; identify critical assets that could be threatened by certain hazards; list vulnerable assets and populations by hazard type; and locate infrastructure vulnerabilities in the city’s evacuation network Key Hazards The following is a list of climate‐related hazards that impact the city of Banning: Air Quality – The city of Banning may experience more frequent days of unsafe levels of atmospheric ozone by 2050. This can cause respiratory conditions in sensitive persons. Drought – Water sources will likely experience more frequent and intense droughts, leading to reductions in the available water supply and potential restrictions on water use. Extreme Heat – Extreme heat incidents can strain the city’s power delivery networks and create health hazards, especially for heat‐sensitive individuals. Flooding – More intense flooding is expected to occur in the 100‐year flood plain along San Gorgonio River, Smith Creek, Montgomery Creek, and a creek north of Gilman Ranch extending into the city’s center. During extreme flood events, flooding could occur nearly throughout all of Banning’s urban core. Human Health Hazards – More frequent and severe wildfires around Banning could worsen air quality, causing health impacts. Warmer conditions are also expected to increase the spread of vector‐borne diseases by organisms like mosquitoes. Landslides – More frequent and intense rainfall could increase the chance that a landslide will likely occur in Banning. Deep‐seated landslides could occur on the hills on both the northern and southern sides of the city. Severe Weather – Strong winds and heavy rains are expected to become more intense around Banning. February 2020 Community Vulnerability Profile Page 2 Wildfire – Drought conditions, extreme heat, and extreme wind events can increase the frequency and intensity of wildfires in the WRCOG region, including the wildland‐urban interface. The city of Banning could experience more severe wildfires in every part of the city, although neighborhoods along the northern edge of Banning face the greatest risk. Critical Assets Table 1 is a list of critical assets that are vulnerable to any of the key climate‐related hazards that are present in the region: Table 1: List of Banning’s Critical Assets by Type and Name Asset Type Asset Name Banning Civic Center, Banning Police Department, Banning Fire Department, Banning Municipal Airport, I‐10, Caltrans Banning Station, Desert Hills Inspections Facility, Yuma railway subdivision, SCE power lines and substations, natural gas Local and Regional Infrastructure pipelines Mt. San Jacinto College San Gorgonio Pass Campus, Banning Major Commercial/Economic Hubs Business Center Banning Dialysis, Banning Family Community Health Center, Banning Healthcare, Cherry Valley Healthcare, Independent Options Inc./Red Bluff House, Morongo Indian Health Clinic, Medical San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital Carpenter Hamilton Park, Dysart Park, Lions Park, Repplier Park, Richard Sanchez Park, Roosevelt Williams/Pass Valley Parks Park, Sylvan Park Banning HeadStart, Banning High, Banning Independent Study School, Central Elementary, Florida St. Discovery Center Pre TK, Hemmerling Elementary, Hoffer Elementary, Milo P. Johnson Center for Learning, New Horizons High School, Nicolet Middle, School Susan B. Coombs Intermediate Key Vulnerabilities Table 2 shows which hazards in Banning may pose the greatest harm to vulnerable groups or assets in the city. A full list of potential vulnerabilities is included in the Western Riverside County Vulnerability Assessment. Table 2: Key Vulnerabilities in Banning by Applicable Hazard Vulnerability Hazards Air Drought Extreme Flooding Human Landslides Severe Wildfire Quality Heat Health Weather Hazards Households in poverty Persons experiencing homelessness Resilient IE Toolkit Community Vulnerability Profile Page 3 Vulnerability Hazards Air Drought Extreme Flooding Human Landslides Severe Wildfire Quality Heat Health Weather Hazards Chronically ill individuals Residential structures Banning Municipal Airport Energy delivery systems Railways Water delivery systems Evacuation Routes Table 3 shows how much of Banning’s evacuation network passes through hazard‐prone areas, and over bridges and water crossings. Map 1 on the following page shows the evacuation network for Banning and the surrounding area. Table 3: Hazard Impacts, Bridges, and Water Crossings for Banning’s Evacuation Route Network Miles or Percent of Quantity Banning’s Network Evacuation Route Miles in Fire Hazard Zones 7 16% Evacuation Route Miles in Flood Hazard Zones 34 77% Evacuation Route Miles in Landslide Hazard Zones 19 43% Banning’s Total Evacuation Network Miles 44 100% 2.3%* Bridge Crossings in Banning’s Evacuation Network 7 ‐‐ Water Crossings in Banning’s Evacuation Network 25 ‐‐ *Indicates the percentage of Banning’s total network as part of the larger Western Riverside County network. February 2020 Community Vulnerability Profile Page 4 Map Map 1: Banning’s Regional Evacuation Network Resilient IE Toolkit Community Vulnerability Profile Page 5 City of Beaumont Executive Summary The Western Riverside
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Location & Our People
    Ourour locationStrength & our people is Community Profile Inland Southern Moreno California Valley Moreno Valley is the fourth largest city in the Inland Empire and our future is soaring! Community Profile Moreno Valley is a progressive city with a bright future. While maintaining its friendly small town attitude, the 50-square-mile community boasts big city amenities including contemporary retail destinations and neighborhood shopping centers, plus a multitude ...superb of options for entertainment, dining, cultural, and recreational experiences and an array of housing options. “quality The City is dedicated to fostering new business and well-managed growth to create a superb quality of life for residents and visitors to enjoy. of life...” Population Moreno Valley’s youthful population totals 203,266 and is projected to exceed 215 thousand by 2019. Solid growth has propelled Moreno Valley to its position as the second largest city in Riverside County, fourth largest in the Inland Empire. POPULATION GROWTH 672,464 643,002 247,736 260,103 203,266 215,504 104,650 109,081 2014 2019 2014 2019 2014 2019 2014 2019 Total Population Within 3 miles Within 5 miles Within 10 Miles Growth Citywide of MV Mall of MV Mall of MV Mall SOURCE: Nielsen, updated April 2014 2 Moreno Valley is the fourth largest city in the Inland Empire and our future is soaring! Market Culture Households by Income Number of households Citywide Within 3 miles Within 5 miles Within 10 Miles ...superb of MV Mall of MV Mall of MV Mall Below $15,000 - $34,999 18,038 11,631 23,885
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr
    FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) 37600 Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA Phone: 951-600-7297 Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951) 276-6701 Visit the F70 website for additional information regarding the airport and procedures at www.rcfva.org Federal Aviation Administration FAA Headquarters 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20591 www.faa.gov/contact Feedback is always appreciated at [email protected] INTRODUCTION In response to community interest, this booklet was developed to provide an overview of Airport operations and the complaint process. It will explain how and what aircraft operate in vicinity of F70, their interaction with our neighbors, and how complaints are handled. (F70 is the identifier selected by Federal Aviation Administration for the French Valley Airport. All airports have a three- character identifier; local examples are ONT for Ontario International Airport and LAX for Los Angeles Airport.) AIRPORT HISTORY In the late 1970s, discussion and planning began on relocating the existing Rancho California Airport due, in part, to safety deficiencies. In addition, the airport was leased to the County with the owner not wanting to renew the lease. An evaluation leading to the identification and selection of potential new sites was undertaken in June 1983. In June 1985 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution designating the French Valley site as the replacement site for the existing Rancho California Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration approved the French Valley Airport Layout plan in 1985 and funded four grants for land acquisition. Initial construction of French Valley Airport began in October 1987 and was completed in April 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • State City Shopping Center Address
    State City Shopping Center Address AK ANCHORAGE 5TH AVENUE MALL SUR 406 W 5TH AVE AL FULTONDALE PROMENADE FULTONDALE 3363 LOWERY PKWY AL HOOVER RIVERCHASE GALLERIA 2300 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA AL MOBILE BEL AIR MALL 3400 BELL AIR MALL AR FAYETTEVILLE NW ARKANSAS MALL 4201 N SHILOH DR AR FORT SMITH CENTRAL MALL 5111 ROGERS AVE AR JONESBORO MALL @ TURTLE CREEK 3000 E HIGHLAND DR STE 516 AR LITTLE ROCK SHACKLEFORD CROSSING 2600 S SHACKLEFORD RD AR NORTH LITTLE ROCK MC CAIN SHOPG CNTR 3929 MCCAIN BLVD STE 500 AR ROGERS PINNACLE HLLS PROMDE 2202 BELLVIEW RD AZ CHANDLER MILL CROSSING 2180 S GILBERT RD AZ FLAGSTAFF FLAGSTAFF MALL 4600 N US HWY 89 AZ GLENDALE ARROWHEAD TOWNE CTR 7750 W ARROWHEAD TOWNE CENTER AZ GOODYEAR PALM VALLEY CORNERST 13333 W MCDOWELL RD AZ LAKE HAVASU CITY SHOPS @ LAKE HAVASU 5651 HWY 95 N AZ MESA SUPERST'N SPRINGS ML 6525 E SOUTHERN AVE AZ NOGALES MARIPOSA WEST PLAZA 220 W MARIPOSA RD AZ PHOENIX AHWATUKEE FOOTHILLS 5050 E RAY RD AZ PHOENIX CHRISTOWN SPECTRUM 1727 W BETHANY HOME RD AZ PHOENIX PARADISE VALLEY MALL 4510 E CACTUS RD AZ TEMPE TEMPE MARKETPLACE 1900 E RIO SALADO PKWY STE 140 AZ TUCSON EL CON SHPG CNTR 3501 E BROADWAY AZ TUCSON TUCSON MALL 4530 N ORACLE RD AZ TUCSON TUCSON SPECTRUM 5265 S CALLE SANTA CRUZ AZ YUMA YUMA PALMS S C 1375 S YUMA PALMS PKWY CA ANTIOCH ORCHARD @SLATTEN RCH 4951 SLATTEN RANCH RD CA ARCADIA WESTFLD SANTA ANITA 400 S BALDWIN AVE CA BAKERSFIELD VALLEY PLAZA 2501 MING AVE CA BREA BREA MALL 400 BREA MALL CA CARLSBAD PLAZA CAMINO REAL 2555 EL CAMINO REAL CA CARSON SOUTHBAY PAV @CARSON 20700 AVALON
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Deltacare USA Dental Offices / Consultorios Dentales De La Red Deltacare USA - California
    Participating DeltaCare USA Dental Offices / Consultorios dentales de la red DeltaCare USA - California Additional Dental Offices will be added as required. You may call our Customer Service department at 800-422-4234 for updates to the provider list. If any office is closed to further enrollment, Delta Dental reserves the right to assign you to another office as close to your home as possible. / Se agregaran mas Oficinas Dentales adicionales conforme se vayan necesitando. Puede llamar al departamento de Servicio al Cliente al 800-422-4234 para obtener una lista de los proveedores. Delta Dental se reserva el derecho de asignarle otra oficina dental lo mas cercana a su casa como sea posible. Please visit our website at deltadentalins.com for the most current listing of dentists. / Por favor visite nuestro sitio web en deltadentalins.com para la lista más actualizada de dentistas. NOTE: Contact the provider before making your choice if you have scheduling problems or small children. / NOTA: Contacte al proveedor antes de escogerlo si tiene problemas o niños pequeños. LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE: Language capabilities are self-reported by the individual dental facilities and not independently verified by Delta Dental. If an enrollee requires language assistance to enable communication in a dental setting, Delta Dental will arrange for professional services through a certified interpretation vendor at no cost to the enrollee. / ATENCIÓN EN OTROS IDIOMAS: Las habilidades en idiomas son informadas por las instalaciones dentales individuales y no son verificadas independientemente por Delta Dental. Si un afiliado requiere ayuda en otro idioma para poder comunicarse durante la cita dental, Delta Dental coordinará los servicios profesionales mediante un proveedor certificado de interpretación sin costo para el afiliado.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfd 05-8 2018
    NEW ISSUE NOT RATED In the opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California (“Bond Counsel”), under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, interest (and original issue discount) on the 2018 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest (and original issue discount) on the 2018 Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. See the caption “LEGAL MATTERS — Tax Matters” with respect to tax consequences concerning the 2018 Bonds. $5,120,000 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 05-8 (SCOTT ROAD) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2018 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on the inside cover page The Community Facilities District No. 05-8 (Scott Road) of the County of Riverside Special Tax Bonds, Series 2018 (the “2018 Bonds”) are being issued and delivered by Community Facilities District No. 05-8 (Scott Road) of the County of Riverside (the “District”) to (i) provide additional financing for certain public infrastructure improvements along a section of Scott Road, (ii) increase the balance in the reserve fund to equal the Reserve Requirement as of the date of issuance of the 2018 Bonds and (iii) pay the costs of issuance with respect to the 2018 Bonds. See “SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS” herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario (Riverside), California a High-Profile Opportunity
    BUSINESS CARD DIE AREA 5425 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300 Chevy Chase, MD 20815 (301) 968-6000 simon.com Information as of 5/1/16 Simon is a global leader in retail real estate ownership, management and development and an S&P 100 company (Simon Property Group, NYSE:SPG). ONTARIO (RIVERSIDE), CALIFORNIA A HIGH-PROFILE OPPORTUNITY Ontario Mills® is located in San Bernardino County, the fifth largest county in California with over 2.1 million residents. — Ontario Mills is well positioned at the intersection of I-10 and I-15, two of the most heavily trafficked interstates in southern California. — Many day trippers and tourist shoppers visit Ontario Mills from Los Angeles and Orange County, which are approximately 35 miles away. — The busy LA/Ontario International Airport is only five minutes away. — Multiple single-family home developments are under construction and scheduled to open over the next several years. — Ontario, California, is home to the Citizens Business Bank Arena, hosting local sporting events and concerts. AN ATTRACTIVE DESTINATION Ontario Mills is California’s largest outlet and value shopping destination. — 100,000-square-foot development now open with new small shops and restaurants, including The North Face, Original Penguin, Samsonite, and Blaze Pizza. Coach, Tommy Hilfiger, and Nautica will be relocating to this new area. — UNIQLO will join the lineup in August 2016 with ULTA Beauty following this Fall. — More than 200 retailers offer a diverse selection of women’s and children’s apparel, sportswear, dining, entertainment, and more. — Ample open-air parking is available. — Millions of area residents and tourists shop at Ontario Mills every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit Countywide Performance Report
    AUGUST 2018 Riverside County Public Transportation Annual Countywide Performance Report FY 2016/2017 Prepared by This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction n 1 About This Report | 1 Context for Public Transit | 1 Performance Reporting n 3 Purposes | 3 The Measures | 3 Policy and Compliance | 4 Utilization | 7 Accessibility and Coverage | 10 Connectivity | 20 Resources | 21 Summary of How We’re Doing n 21 What Do This Year’s Indicators Suggest for Riverside County Public Transportation | 27 New Transit Initiatives n 21 City of Corona | 26 City of Riverside | 26 Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency | 27 Pass Transit - City of Banning | 28 Pass Transit - City of Beaumont | 28 Riverside Transit Agency | 28 Sunline Transit Agency | 29 The Challenge Going Forward n 30 Strategies to Promote Responsiveness to Customer Needs | 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendices n 32 Appendix A – Definitions, Data Sets, and References | 33 Appendix B – Public Transit Trips Provided, All Modes | 34 Appendix C – Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators Supporting Table 5 (Transfer Locations) | 35 Appendix D – Public Transit Fleet Size Over Four Fiscal Years | 39 Appendix E – Public Utilities Code Requirement for Performance Monitoring | 40 Introduction About This Report This fifth iteration of the RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT, FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 (COUNTYWIDE REPORT) examines the performance of public transportation services of rail, bus, demand response and specialized transportation in Riverside County. Prepared in compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 99244, this report reflects Transportation Development Act (TDA) requirements that county transportation planning agencies monitor transit provider performance. The COUNTYWIDE REPORT serves another purpose: providing a comprehensive, countywide picture of public transit expenditures and what was provided and consumed for these investments.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: Corona, CA Accident Number: LAX05FA041 Date & Time: 11/25/2004, 1434 PST Registration: N747JU Aircraft: Cessna 411 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 2 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis The multiengine airplane impacted terrain shortly after departing from the airport. The airplane began the initial climb after liftoff and initially maintained a track along the extended runway centerline. Witnesses indicated that about 1 mile into the initial climb, the aircraft began to make erratic yawing maneuvers and the engines began to emit smoke. The airplane rolled to the left and dove toward the ground, erupting into fire upon impact. Prior to the accident, the pilot had reportedly been having mechanical problems with the fuel tank bladder installations and had attempted to install new ones. He was performing his own maintenance on the airplane in an attempt to rectify the problem. The day before the accident, the pilot told his hangar mate that he took the airplane on a test flight and experienced mechanical problems with an engine. Neither the nature of the engine problems nor the actions to resolve the discrepancies could be determined. On site examination of the thermally destroyed wreckage disclosed evidence consistent with the right engine producing significantly more power than the left engine at ground impact. The extent of the thermal destruction precluded any determination regarding the fuel selector positions, the positions for the boost pump switches, or the fuel tanks/lines. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: A loss of engine(s) power for undetermined reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final
    DRAFT FINAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN for FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Riverside County, California Draft Final Technical Report Prepared by Coffman Associates, Inc. April 2009 “The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49, United States Code, Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.” FRENCH VALLEY TABLE OF CONTENTS A•I•R•P•O•R•T FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT Murrieta, California Draft Final Airport Master Plan INTRODUCTION MASTER PLAN OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... ii MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS AND PROCESS ................................................. ii COORDINATION .............................................................................................. iv Chapter One INVENTORY REGIONAL SETTING..................................................................................... 1-1 Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 1-2 Climate .................................................................................................. 1-2 Utilities .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fy2021-2023 Srtp
    SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY21-FY23 Short Range Transit Plan • FY21 – FY23 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS .......................................................................... 8 Population Profile – Rider Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 8 Population Profile ................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 FIXED-ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES ............................................................................................... 10 Fixed-route Services ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Paratransit Services ............................................................................................................................................ 10 1.4 EXISTING FIXED-ROUTE AND DIAL-A-RIDE SERVICE ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Application Record
    Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF PAYLESS SHOESOURCE CANADA INC. AND PAYLESS SHOESOURCE CANADA GP INC. (the “Applicants”) APPLICATION RECORD February 19, 2019 Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Ryan Jacobs LSO#: 59510J Tel: 416. 860.6465 Fax: 416. 640.3189 [email protected] Jane Dietrich LSO#: 49302U Tel : 416. 860.5223 Fax : 416. 640.3144 [email protected] Natalie E. Levine LSO#: 64980K Tel : 416. 860.6568 Fax : 416. 640.3207 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless ShoeSource Canada Inc., Payless ShoeSource Canada GP Inc. and Payless ShoeSource Canada LP TO: SERVICE LIST ATTACHED LEGAL*47453748.1 SERVICE LIST TO: Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West, Suite 2100 Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Ryan Jacobs Tel: 416.860.6465 Fax: 416.640.3189 [email protected] Jane Dietrich Tel: 416.860.5223 Fax: 416.640.3144 [email protected] Natalie E. Levine Tel: 416.860.6568 Fax: 416.640.3207 [email protected] Monique Sassi Tel: 416.860.6572 Fax: 416.642.7150 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless ShoeSource Canada Inc., Payless ShoeSource Canada GP Inc. and Payless ShoeSource Canada LP, (collectively, the “Payless Canada Entities”) LEGAL*47453748.1 AND TO: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036-6745 Ira Dizengoff Tel: 212.872.1096 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Meredith Lahaie Tel: 212.872.8032 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Kevin Zuzolo Tel: 212.872.7471 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Julie Thompson Tel: 202.887.4516 Fax: 202.887.4288 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless Holdings LLC and its debtor affiliates AND TO: FTI Consulting Canada Inc.
    [Show full text]