Excavations by York Archaeological Trust Within the Walled Area to the South-West of the River Ouse, York

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Excavations by York Archaeological Trust Within the Walled Area to the South-West of the River Ouse, York YORK ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST EXCAVATIONS BY YORK ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST WITHIN THE WALLED AREA TO THE SOUTH-WEST OF THE RIVER OUSE, YORK By J.M. McComish WEB BASED REPORT Report Number 2015/48 September 2015 YORK ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST York Archaeological Trust undertakes a wide range of urban and rural archaeological consultancies, surveys, evaluations, assessments and excavations for commercial, academic and charitable clients. We manage projects, provide professional advice and fieldwork to ensure a high quality, cost effective archaeological and heritage service. Our staff have a considerable depth and variety of professional experience and an international reputation for research, development and maximising the public, educational and commercial benefits of archaeology. Based in York, Sheffield, Nottingham and Glasgow the Trust’s services are available throughout Britain and beyond. York Archaeological Trust, Cuthbert Morrell House, 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX Phone: +44 (0)1904 663000 Fax: +44 (0)1904 663024 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.yorkarchaeology.co.uk © 2015 York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited Registered Office: 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX A Company Limited by Guarantee. Registered in England No. 1430801 A registered Charity in England & Wales (No. 509060) and Scotland (No. SCO42846) York Archaeological Trust 3 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4 2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 4 3 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND .......................................................... 5 3.1 The history of York in the Roman and Anglian periods ...................................................... 5 3.2 Roman and Anglian remains observed/found from the 18 th to mid-20 th century ............... 7 4 THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE CIVILIAN SETTLEMENT ...................................... 8 4.1 The founding of the fortress to c. AD 120 ......................................................................... 9 4.2 c. AD 120 to the third quarter of the 2 nd century ............................................................. 10 4.3 The late 2 nd to mid-3rd centuries ..................................................................................... 14 4.4 The mid-3rd century to the mid-4th century ..................................................................... 17 4.5 The late 4 th to early 5 th centuries .................................................................................... 18 4.6 Roman features that could not be closely dated ............................................................. 19 4.6 The Anglian period ......................................................................................................... 20 4.7 The eventual disappearance of the Roman buildings ...................................................... 21 5 CONCLUDING REMARKS ............................................................................................... 21 5.1 The case for further excavation ...................................................................................... 22 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 24 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 25 APPENDIX 1 YAT GAZETTEEER ENTRIES FOR SITES WITHIN THE WALLED AREA TO THE SOUTH-WEST OF THE OUSE WITH ROMAN AND ANGLIAN REMAINS ................................................................. 26 APPENDIX 2 YAT EXCAVATIONS SINCE 1997 WITHIN THE WALLED AREA TO THE SOUTH-WEST OF THE OUSE WITH ROMAN AND ANGLIAN REMAINS ........................................................................ 36 Plates Cover: Roman timber buildings at the General Accident site, Tanner Row, York Plate 1 The surface of the Roman road to Tadcaster, and detail of the lead water pipe. ...........11 Plate 2 Excavation in the Roman stone building at Wellington Row, York. ..................................11 Plate 3 The Roman timber buildings at the General Accident Tanner Row site, York .................12 Plate 4 Evidence of timber flooring within the major stone building at Wellington Row, York. 15 Plate 5 Roman walling including a tile lined arch at the Queen’s Hotel site, York .......................18 Figures Pages 39-46 YAT excavations south-west of the Ouse York Archaeological Trust Web Based Report Report No 2015/48 York Archaeological Trust 4 1 INTRODUCTION This report gives an overview of the walled area to the south-west of the river Ouse during the Roman and Anglian periods ( c. AD 71-875). This area was the site of the Roman civilian settlement in York, which was sufficiently important by the early third century to have been made the capital of the province of Britannia Inferior , and to have attained the rank of colonia (the highest rank of Roman town). Quite what happened to the colonia in the immediate post- Roman period is uncertain, many sites were covered by an accumulation of soil, known as dark-earth, but the presence of a small number of Anglian structures, and of stray finds of artefacts suggests that there was some activity, though this may have been on a limited scale. The report draws together the results of York Archaeological Trust’s investigations in this area, in particular the major excavations at 5 Rougier Street, the General Accident site at Tanner Row, Queen’s Hotel on Micklegate and Wellington Row. The report was prepared with a grant from The Museum Resilience Fund, and it aims to highlight the importance of these excavations and their potential for further research. For brevity ‘the walled area south-west of the Ouse’ is referred to as either the study area, or the colonia , as appropriate from here on. 2 METHODOLOGY The first task was to determine which archaeological investigations in the study area had yielded Roman and Anglian remains. This was done using a combination of the York Archaeological Trust Gazetteer, project code lists and associated archives. The gazetteer entries for the relevant sites are listed in Appendix 1, while summaries of the sites excavated since 2000 are given in Appendix 2. Either a detailed archive report or a grey-literature report is available for all of the sites listed in the appendices. In addition, the stratigraphic sequences of two excavations in Bishophill are fully published (Carver et al., 1978), while remains uncovered at several of the sites in the study area are summarised in Ottaway’s (1993) publication on Roman York. There are also a number of publications relating to the artefacts and ecofacts recovered from these excavations, or summaries of the evidence for various periods (Holdsworth 1978, MacGregor 1978, Hall et al. 1980, Moulden and Tweddle 1986, Hall and Kenward 1990, O’Connor 1984, O’Connor 1988, Perrin 1981, Perrin 1990 and Monaghan 1997, and Tweddle et al. 1999). The text of section 4 is based on a combination of the York Archaeological Trust gazetteer entries and archive reports, together with information from published material. Thirty-five sites investigated by York Archaeological Trust in the study area have yielded Roman and Anglian remains (Figures 1-2). Fourteen of these comprised the observation of bore-holes, or were archaeological watching briefs. It is difficult to interpret the results from such sites, as the remains are usually observed in limited areas, and often lack clear dating evidence. The remaining 21 sites were excavations or evaluations, but many of these comprised small trenches, again hampering interpretation of the results. For example, at the site of the former Presto’s Supermarket, on George Hudson Street, the Roman deposits were observed in a trench that was only 3.2m x 3.25m in size. The few larger scale excavations in the study area were: YAT excavations south-west of the Ouse York Archaeological Trust Web Based Report Report No 2015/48 York Archaeological Trust 5 Bishophill I, 58-59 Skeldergate, site code 1973-75.14 Bishophill II, 37 Bishophill senior, site code 1973.15 5 Rougier Street, YAT site code.12 General Accident, Tanner Row, site code 1983-84.32 Queen’s Hotel, site code 1988-89.17 Stakis, Leedhams Garage, Wellington Row, York, site codes 1988-89.24 and 1990.24 3 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND The following summary of the history of York in the Roman and Anglian periods (3.1) and of previously observed archaeological remains (3.2) is given to provide the context for the various excavations by York Archaeological Trust undertaken in the study area. 3.1 The history of York in the Roman and Anglian periods The Legio IX Hispana built a fortress in York, the generally accepted foundation date being AD 71 (RCHM 1962, xxix). The fortress would originally have comprised a temporary encampment, but this was gradually replaced with timber, then stone buildings (McComish 2012, 39-40). Despite this rebuilding, timber structures were still present within the fortress in the early second century (Ottaway 1996, 291). The area between the fortress and the rivers Ouse and Foss was used for activities relating to military provisioning, including a grain warehouse, and the legionary kilns (McComish 2012, 41-2). Relatively little evidence of civilian activity relating to the period of Legio IX occupation has been recovered; though some timber structures
Recommended publications
  • The Walls but on the Rampart Underneath and the Ditch Surrounding Them
    A walk through 1,900 years of history The Bar Walls of York are the finest and most complete of any town in England. There are five main “bars” (big gateways), one postern (a small gateway) one Victorian gateway, and 45 towers. At two miles (3.4 kilometres), they are also the longest town walls in the country. Allow two hours to walk around the entire circuit. In medieval times the defence of the city relied not just on the walls but on the rampart underneath and the ditch surrounding them. The ditch, which has been filled in almost everywhere, was once 60 feet (18.3m) wide and 10 feet (3m) deep! The Walls are generally 13 feet (4m) high and 6 feet (1.8m) wide. The rampart on which they stand is up to 30 feet high (9m) and 100 feet (30m) wide and conceals the earlier defences built by Romans, Vikings and Normans. The Roman defences The Normans In AD71 the Roman 9th Legion arrived at the strategic spot where It took William The Conqueror two years to move north after his the rivers Ouse and Foss met. They quickly set about building a victory at the Battle of Hastings in 1066. In 1068 anti-Norman sound set of defences, as the local tribe –the Brigantes – were not sentiment in the north was gathering steam around York. very friendly. However, when William marched north to quell the potential for rebellion his advance caused such alarm that he entered the city The first defences were simple: a ditch, an embankment made of unopposed.
    [Show full text]
  • 45 Hampden Street, Bishophill, York, YO1 6EA
    45 Hampden Street, Bishophill, York, YO1 6EA Guide Price: £230,000 A beautiful 2 bedroom town house which has been the subject of updating works over recent years situated in the highly regarded Bishophill area. DESCRIPTION This tastefully presented two bedroom town house provides accommodation which would suite a variety of purchasers from investors wanting a property for holiday lets to owner occupiers alike. Located on the sought after Hampden Street, the home offers buyers the fantastic opportunity to live within the city walls and have access to the wide and varied amenities within York city centre and also close by on Micklegate. Having being recently updated, the accommodation briefly comprises: to the ground floor; entrance hall with stairs off, sitting room with understairs office area, refitted kitchen with integrated appliances and space for a dining table, inner hall with door leading to courtyard, bathroom with white suite. To the first floor; the stairs lead to the landing area and two bedrooms. OUTSIDE To the rear is the courtyard garden which is attractively presented offering the opportunity for alfresco dining, a rarity within the city centre. LOCAL AREA The Bishophill area of York lies within the City Walls and is a few minutes walk to both the City Centre and the railway station. It is also positioned on the west side of the centre allowing easy access out to the A64, Leeds and beyond. The amenities of Bishopthorpe Road and nearby river also add to the appeal of Yorks many bar, café and retail facilities on the doorstep. 3 High Petergate York North Yorkshire YO1 7EN T: 01904 653564 F: 01904 640067 E: [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • Micklegate Soap Box Run Sunday Evening 26Th August and All Day Bank Holiday Monday 27Th August 2018 Diversions to Bus Services
    Micklegate Soap Box Run Sunday evening 26th August and all day Bank Holiday Monday 27th August 2018 Diversions to bus services Bank Holiday Monday 27th August is the third annual Micklegate Run soap box event, in the heart of York city centre. Micklegate, Bridge Street, Ouse Bridge and Low Ousegate will all be closed for the event, with no access through these roads or Rougier Street or Skeldergate. Our buses will divert: -on the evening of Sunday 26th August during set up for the event. -all day on Bank Holiday Monday 27th August while the event takes place. Diversions will be as follows. Delays are likely on all services (including those running normal route) due to increased traffic around the closed roads. Roads will close at 18:10 on Sunday 26th, any bus which will not make it through the closure in time will divert, this includes buses which will need to start the diversion prior to 18:10. Route 1 Wigginton – Chapelfields – will be able to follow its normal route throughout. Route 2 Rawcliffe Bar Park & Ride – will be able to follow its normal route throughout. Route 3 Askham Bar Park & Ride – Sunday 26th August: will follow its normal route up to and including the 18:05 departure from Tower Street back to Askham Bar Park & Ride. The additional Summer late night Shakespeare Theatre buses will then divert as follows: From Askham Bar Park & Ride, normal route to Blossom Street, then right onto Nunnery Lane (not serving the Rail Station into town), left Bishopgate Street, over Skeldergate Bridge to Tower Street as normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Risk of Flooding
    reducing the risk of flooding A guide to our flood defence schemes in York x73694_EA_p10_sb.indd 1 10/3/09 08:31:28 We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Published by: Environment Agency Rivers House 21 Park Square South Leeds LS1 2QG Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk February 2009 © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. x73694_EA_p8_vw.indd 2 24/2/09 16:33:09 Flooding is a natural occurrence. we can’t always stop flooding but we can help to prevent it. We aim to reduce the risk of flooding by managing land, rivers, coastal systems and flood defences. While we do everything we can to reduce the chance of flooding, it is a natural process and can never be completely eliminated. Environment Agency Protecting York from flooding 1 x73694_EA_p9_sb.indd 1 5/3/09 18:11:21 reducing the risk During a flood, we issue flood warnings. We also control our systems such as flood gates and barriers What is the ‘normal’ and we clear obstructions that may cause hazards. level of water in York? The normal water level (sometimes We use the latest technology to monitor river levels, rainfall, tides and sea called the normal summer water conditions, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at Rougier Street, York, 1981
    Excavations at Rougier Street, York, 1981 It is not often that there is a chance to excavate inside the Roman colonia, the civilian town. One arose, however, in spring 1981 with the proposed redevelopment of a small site between the Richard III pub and the Leedham's garage on Rougier Street, and by agreement with the architects and developers, Towngate Securities, it was decided to excavate a trench 2.50m wide and 12m long. The archaeological aims of the excavation were threefold: to try to locate a Roman colonia riverside wall; to trace the development of the river frontage; and to look for evidence of the medieval tanning industry. It has been suggested by analogy with Roman London and other towns in the Empire that the Roman colonia had a wall running parallel and adjacent to the River Ouse, but no evidence for one has as yet come to light in York. Whether this wall is found or not, however, it remains the case that very little excavation to modern standards has taken place in the colonia, and any glimpse of Roman deposits would be useful both from the point of view of learning more about its topography and recovering samples for research into its environment. The development of the river front has been glimpsed already in Trust excavation at Skeldergate and Coney Street (INTERIM vol 1 no 1 pp20-21; vol 2 no 3 pp7-11, vol 2 no 2 pp21-6) but there is still much to learn. The medieval tanning industry is, in contrast to the colonia wall, well documented.
    [Show full text]
  • OBERHOFFER Herr RW 14 Bootham Crescent
    600 , YORK CLASSIFIED TRADES• • Child Wm. Storr, 34 Clarence st Dixon Chas. 7 Lime st. Hungate Hanforth T. W. 38 Bishopthorpe Dixon John, 9, 10 & 11 Garden roa.d street, Groves Naylor John, Mus Doe. Oxon. Eccles Wm. 5 Skeldergate (organist and choir master), 9 Fail Geo. 20 Layerthorpe Grosvenor terrace Fearby W. H. 62 Walmgate Newton Wm. 2 Peckitt st Gilbank Thos. 1 Bromley st. Lee. Newton Wm. & Mrs. 5 Wilton ter man road Fulford road Goates Geo.61 Walmgate OBERHOFFER Herr R. W. 14 Green Mrs. 41 Bright st. Leeman Bootham crescent road Padell Herr C. G. Park cottage, HackwelI Wm. Charles st. & CIar­ Park st. ence street Sample Arthur, 36 Grosvenor ter Hardcastle Chas. 34 Layerthorpe Smith Thos. 43 Marygate Harrison .Tohn, 16 & 18 Garden Wright Wm. Robt. Mus. Bac. Oxon. place, Rungate 20 St. Saviourga.te Rarrison Bobt. 1 Park crescentr Provision Dealers. Groves Alderson Wm. 31 Gillygate Ressay Miss Emma, 35 Shambles Allen Joseph, 1 Kingsland terrace, Hodgson Jas. 58 Walmgate Leeman road Hodgson John Wm. post office, Andrew Jos. 2 Fishergate Olifton Anson Mrs. E. 21 Grove place, Hodgson Boger, 46 Tanner row Groves Rodgson Thos. 14 Layerthorpe Atkinson Ed. 23 Blossom st Holmes Mrs. M. A. 27 Layerthorpe Barrow Samuel J. 24 Layerthorpe Horsley Carton B, 6 Heworth rd Beedham Rd. 1 Vyner st Howden H. J. 1 Ranover st. Lee· Benson Wm. Townend st & Mans­ man road field place Ruby Fred. 28 North st Beresford Jas. Elliott, 39 Low Ruby Mrs. Jane. 40 Townend,st Petergate Rumphrey Geo. 42 Fossgate Blair Chas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating the Slum: Representations of Poverty in the Hungate and Walmgate Districts of York, 1875-1914
    Laura Harrison Ex Historia 61 Laura Harrison1 University of Leeds Creating the slum: representations of poverty in the Hungate and Walmgate districts of York, 1875-1914 In his first social survey of York, B. Seebohm Rowntree described the Walmgate and Hungate areas as ‘the largest poor district in the city’ comprising ‘some typical slum areas’.2 The York Medical Officer of Health condemned the small and fetid yards and alleyways that branched off the main Walmgate thoroughfare in his 1914 report, noting that ‘there are no amenities; it is an absolute slum’.3 Newspapers regularly denounced the behaviour of the area’s residents; reporting on notorious individuals and particular neighbourhoods, and in an 1892 report to the Watch Committee the Chief Constable put the case for more police officers on the account of Walmgate becoming increasingly ‘difficult to manage’.4 James Cave recalled when he was a child the police would only enter Hungate ‘in twos and threes’.5 The Hungate and Walmgate districts were the focus of social surveys and reports, they featured in complaints by sanitary inspectors and the police, and residents were prominent in court and newspaper reports. The area was repeatedly characterised as a slum, and its inhabitants as existing on the edge of acceptable living conditions and behaviour. Condemned as sanitary abominations, observers made explicit connections between the physical condition of these spaces and the moral behaviour of their 1 Laura ([email protected]) is a doctoral candidate at the University of Leeds, and recently submitted her thesis ‘Negotiating the meanings of space: leisure, courtship and the young working class of York, c.1880-1920’.
    [Show full text]
  • Scawins Hotel," Family and Easton Mrs
    YORK ALPHABETICAL DIRECTORY. 349 • Dyson Benjamin, railway ticket Easton Harry, sl:hoolmasetr, 22 examiner, 40 Thorpe street Rougier st Easton John, j. jrille~, 12 Upper DYSON G. H. (late Abbott), St. Paul's terrace " Scawins Hotel," family and Easton Mrs. 2 Margaret st commercial, Tanner row, East Riding of Yorkshire, Ouse opposite the Old Station and Derwent Division Constab­ gates (See advt. before map) lury, Robt. Holtby, clerk; Geo. Clark, sergt. in charge, Alms. Dyson Geo. j. joiner, 2 Fairfax st terrace Dyson Meek, solicitor and commis­ sioner for oaths, and clerk to the Eastwood Geo. plane manufac­ school attendance committee, turer, and tool warLhouse, Per· office 56 Coney street severance works, 52 Walmgate Dyson Mrs. E. West View house, Eastwood Geo. rly. workman, 38 Bishopthorpe road Fairfax st Dyson Mrs. H. 40 Bell Vue street Eastwood Geo. labourer, 14 Wood Dyson Thos. solicitor at Birming­ st. Mill lane ham, 9 Fountayne street Eastwood Panl, j. joiner, 33 Rede­ Dyson W. B. woollen draper, 29 ness street High Ousegate Eastwood Thos, railway fireman, Eacott Rev. J. 2 Clarendon ter­ 20 Fenwick st race, Scarcroft road Eaton Mrs. 7 RUtiby plaee Eagle Mrs. milliner, 4 Bridge st Ebor Discount Lo·m Company­ Eagle Robt. hair cutter 23 Belle Office, 36 Stonegate Vue street Ebor Permanent Building Society, Eagle Thos. j. painter, 4 Bridge st Offices-14 Castlegate, secretary Eagle T.L. tobacconist, 148 Walm­ E. F. Lewin gate Eccles Chas. general dealer, and Eardley Hy. j. confectioner, 23 marine stores, 6 & 7 Peter lane Buckingham st Eccles Geo. j. joiner, Long Close Earle Hy.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman York: from the Core to the Periphery
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD CLASS HERITAGE CONFERENCE, 2011 Sponsored by York Archaeological Forum Roman York, from the Core to the Periphery: an Introduction to the Big Picture Patrick Ottaway PJO Archaeology Introduction Amongst the objectives of the 2012 World Class Heritage conference was a review of some of the principal research themes in York’s archaeology in terms both of what had been achieved since the publication of the York Development and Archaeology Study in 1991 (the ‘Ove Arup Report’) and of what might be achieved in years to come. As far as the Roman period is concerned, one of the more important developments of the last twenty years may be found in the new opportunities for research into the relationship between, on the one hand, the fortress and principal civilian settlements, north-east and south-west of the Ouse, - ‘the core’ – and, on the other hand, the surrounding region, in particular a hinterland zone within c. 3-4 km of the city centre, roughly between the inner and outer ring roads – ‘the periphery’. This development represents one of the more successful outcomes from the list of recommended projects in the Ove Arup report, amongst which was ‘The Hinterland Survey’ (Project 7, p.33). Furthermore, it responds to the essay in the Technical Appendix to the Arup report in which Steve Roskams stresses that it is crucial to study York in its regional context if we are to understand it in relation to an ‘analysis of Roman imperialism’ (see also Roskams 1999). The use of the term ‘imperialism’ here gives a political edge to a historical process more often known as ‘Romanisation’ for which, in Britain, material culture is the principal evidence in respect of agriculture, religion, society, technology, the arts and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • John Carr of York 1723 – 1807 Bruce Speed November 2019
    The Life and Work of John Carr of York 1723 – 1807 Bruce Speed November 2019 John Carr by William Beechey 1791 HAREWOOD Garden Front as modified by Sir Charles Barry The iconic Henry Flitcroft frontage of WENTWORTH WOODHOUSE. Carr took over and completed the project, designing the Stables and Riding School, lodges, the Rockingham Mausoleum and Keppel’s Column over 50 years. THE CRESCENT, BUXTON, Carr’s favourite, the drawings for which his hand rests on his portrait CROFT BRIDGE, RIVER TEES, 1795, one many designed by Carr. Carr’s Birthplace near Wakefield Huthwaite Hall, Thurgoland 1748, Carr’s first Photograph by Stephen Richards for use under Creative Commons Licence Huthwaite Hall, Thurgoland, as it is today FARNLEY HALL, CARR’S GEORGIAN ADDITION TO JACOBEAN MANSION FARNLEY HALL Group visit in April 2019 Kirby Hall, Little Ouseburn designed by Roger Morris and the Earl of Burlington, gave Carr project management experience, 1748 -55 Photo from The Life and Works of John Carr of York by Brian Wragg. Enclosure of the Pikeing Well was Carr’s first project for the City of York. ALBION STREET, SKELDERGATE, the site of Carr’s Garden. The house was demolished in the 1940’s KNAVESMIRE STANDHOUSE. Carr’s design won against strong competition with the support of the Marquis of Rockingham, leading to long involvement with the family. 2ND MARQUIS OF ROCKINGHAM After Joshua Reynolds WENTWORTH WOODHOUSE THE BARAOQUE MANSION OF 1725 WENTWORTH WOODHOUSE HAREWOOD Garden Front of Carr’s most important Yorkshire house HAREWOOD NEWBY HALL, Carr turned the building making the east front the entrance and added the wing for the gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Elegant Letter
    BOUNDLESS QUIZ – 4 ANSWERS – Shown bold and underlined 1. a. Corner of Davygate New Street: The coat of arms is that of the Burnley Building Society who had a branch on that premises. 2. b. Mulberry Hall: You can see the date of the building from Stonegate. 3. b. Dean and Chapter of York Minster: The building is the Chapter House, part of York Minster, where the Dean and Chapter (governing body) meet. 4. a. York St John University: The house was on the corner of Gillygate and Lord Mayors Walk. 5. a. Museum Street 6. b. Goodramgate: The church is Holy Trinity, Goodramgate. 7. a. Stonemasons: These shelters are replicas of those used by medieval stonemasons working on the Minster. 8. c. St Helen: St Helen’s graveyard used to be in front of the church and extended towards the Mansion House. It was moved to the Davygate location in 1745. 9. a. Guildhall: The Guildhall is situated behind the Mansion House. 10. b. On archway opposite West End of Minster: The archway was the entrance to the Pury-Cust Nursing Home. The nursing home was named after Dean Pury-Cust, Dean of York Minster 1880 to 1915. 11. c. Foss Islands Road: 12. c. Lendal: 13. b. Goodramgate: The timber framed buildings are 16th-17th century. 14. a. Dean of York Minster: The building is the Dean’s residence, built in 1939. 15. b. Skeldergate: This is the access point for the Bar Walls. This access point was created in 1881 when a portion of the Bar Walls extending towards the river, was demolished to accommodate the roads leading to the newly built Skeldergate Bridge.
    [Show full text]