DOCSLIB.ORG

Sherry Turkle, Psychoanalytic Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sherry Turkle, Psychoanalytic Politics Psychoanalytic Politics PSYCHOANALYTIC POLITICS Freud’s French Revolution SHERRY TURKLE Basic Books, Inc., Publishers NEW YORK ‘ ‘In Memory o f Sigmund Freud” reprinted by permission from Collected Poems, by W . H. Auden, edited by Edward Mendelson (New York: Random House, 1976). Copyright© 1940, 1968 by W. H. Auden. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Turkle, Sherry. Psychoanalytic politics. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Psychoanalysis— France. 2. Psychoanalysis— Social aspects— France. 3. Psychoanalysis— France— Political aspects. 4. Lacan, Jacques, 1901- 5. France— History— 20th century. I. Title. BF175.T87 I50'.I9'520944 78-54494 ISBN: 0-465-06607-0 Copyright © 1978 by Basic Books, Inc. Printed in the United States of America DESIGNED BY VINCENT TORRE 10 987654321 Edith Bonowitz and Harriet Turkle Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Introduction Freud’s French Revolution PART ONE The French Freud Chapter i The Social Roots of Psychoanalytic Culture Chapter 2 “ Reinventing” Freud in France Chapter 3 May 1968 and Psychoanalytic Ideology PART TWO Politics in Psychoanalysis Chapter 4 For or Against Lacan Chapter 5 Psychoanalytic Societies and Psychoanalytic Science PART THREE Psychoanalysis in Politics Chapter 6 Psychoanalysis as Schizoanalysis: Antipsychiatry Chapter 7 Psychoanalysis as Science: The University PART FOUR Psychoanalysis in Popular Culture Chapter 8 Psychoanalysis as Popular Culture: The Perils of Popularity 191 Chapter 9 ‘ 'Saving French Freud’ ’ 210 Conclusion From May 1968 to the New Philosophy 225 Epilogue Lacan in America: Poetry and Science 234 NOTES 249 INDEX 269 Acknowledgments THIS BOOK is about the emergence of a psychoanalytic culture. The themes raised by this sociology of a science of mind are not unique to any one place or time, but this book deals with a specific case, that of France in recent years. It grew out of a field experience in that country, and my greatest debt is, of course, to all my French informants who shared their experiences and opinions with me as well as their kindness, hospitality, and humour. In the world of French psychoanalytic culture, psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan has so special and central a role that his willingness to participate in my research, to discuss contemporary psychoanalytic history with me, was of crucial importance to my work. I am deeply grateful for his cooperation. Of course, I owe a similar debt to my many other informants, who included nearly one hundred fifty practicing French psychoanalysts, each of whom added a new dimension to the story. But a rather special problem makes it difficult for me to thank them in the usual manner. Psychoanalytic history has been explosive, schismatic, deeply personal. Its controversies have often been played out in personal denunciations and more “ political” sanctions, excommunications, and schisms within the framework of psychoanalytic institutions. In France, the story has been particularly stormy; conversations about it often carried a high emotional charge. Among my informants, some preferred that their names not be mentioned in any reporting of my work. Since the absence of a name can convey as much information as its presence, a traditional list of acknowledgments seemed disrespectful of the privacy of those who had helped me. So, with the exception of Lacan whose special role demanded that his cooperation be acknowledged, I shall not thank my informants individually for their help, but I hope that each appreciates the depth of my gratitude. I have also followed the consistent policy in the text of not attributing quotations that come from my interview work, although, of course, I always cite an author when I draw from the public record. I also owe thanks to many teachers and colleagues in the United States. George Goethals, George Homans, Stanley Hoffmann, Stanley King, and Laurence Wylie of Harvard University encouraged me to pursue my doctoral studies of the French Freud along a fieldwork model and gave me excellent advice and criticism as my work progressed. I have a special debt to David and Evey Riesman who offered thoughtful criticism as well as confidence and consideration through the years of researching and writing this book. I also profited from comments on earlier drafts and on sections of this book by Daniel Bell, John Berlow, Saul Friedlander, Nathan Hale, Carl Kaysen, Kenneth Keniston, Mar­ tin Kessler, Leo Marx, David Misunas, Farrell Phillips, and Nancy Rosenblum. I was fortunate during my field experience to have had the friend­ ship of two extraordinary Frenchwomen, Anne Fresco and Janine Maucorps, who made dépaysement less painful. On my return to the United States, the difficulties and frustrations of writing were made considerably easier by Mildred Bonowitz, Robert Bonowitz, and Susan Marsten. My husband Seymour Papert has been a continual source of love, support, and good ideas. In my moments of discouragement he helped me to put one foot in front of the other; in my moments of energy and enthusiasm he encouraged me to ask more of myself. Cambridge, Massachusetts August 1978 Psychoanalytic Politics Introduction Freud’ s French Revolution URING May and June 1968, French society experienced a social explosion of near revolutionary proportions. A student protest in the Department of Sociology at the University of Paris at Nanterre had escalated into a social movement that struck at every level of French so­ ciety. In the space of weeks, not only the universities, but the factories, the theaters, the high schools, and the hospitals, too, were on strike. People rejected the authority not only of the government and the em­ ployer, but of the traditional Opposition— the Left political parties and trade unions as well. The turbulent May days created the impression of a vacuum of power which made it look— if only for a short time— as if control of the French state could be taken by any group with sufficient organization and will. France was gripped by a paroxysm of the spoken word. There were confrontations and attempts at communication across generational and class lines that were unparalleled in her recent national life. The spirit of the May days was utopian, expressive, and festive. The ideology of the celebrants was to avoid traditional ideology. The fresh outlook of May downplayed traditional forms of structured politi­ cal action and stressed an existential revolution of the person. For most participants, May-June 1968 was a deeply moving personal experience, yet the May events, judged by standard revolutionary politi­ cal criteria, were a failure. Power was not seized; within a few weeks, life in France returned to normal. The public buildings that had been oc­ cupied were washed and put back into order, the ubiquitous posters were stripped away, and the graffiti were sandblasted from the walls. By mid-June, Paris was cleaned up and returned to the tourists, its cob­ blestones paved over— building blocks of the barricades frozen in cement. At the time, observers of the French scene searched in vain for traces of the May events on French life. In this book we will describe ways in which May 1968 marked and gave momentum to a profound though not immediately visible kind of change: the dramatic reversal of the rela­ tionship between psychoanalysis and French society and culture. In the course of the 1960s, the French attitude toward psychoanalysis swung from denigration and resistance to infatuation in one of the most dra­ matic social reversals of an intellectual position in modem history. Until recently, it had been commonplace in twentieth-century intellectual his­ tory to contrast the American ‘ ‘overacceptance of psychoanalysis ’ ’ with France’s violent and sustained rejection of it. In fact, the first to com­ ment on the differences in the fate of psychoanalysis in France and America was Freud himself. When Freud came to America in 1909, he was amazed. After con­ fronting the skepticism of the medical and scientific communities in Europe, Freud found the America of 1909 a welcome terrain. Professors at Clark University seemed astoundingly unprejudiced and open, even to the point of giving psychoanalysis a place in their lectures at a time when their European counterparts were ignorant or scornful of the new doctrine. “ In prudish America,” remarked Freud, “ it was possible, at least in academic circles, to discuss freely and scientifically everything that in ordinary life is regarded as objectionable.” 1 In the capitals of Europe, the situation was reversed: life was “ sophisticated” and the universities puritanical. Freud could only wonder at the attitude of the Americans: “ They don’t understand that I am bringing them the plague.” Only five years after his American visit, Freud noted that something was going wrong in America. Americans were accepting psychoana­ lysis too easily, and Freud took this as a sure sign that they were misun­ derstanding it, watering it down, and sweetening it to their taste. To his mind, if the Americans really had been accepting the theory of infantile sexuality, for example, things would not have been going so smoothly. Freud believed that too easy an acceptance meant that psychoanalysis was being denatured, and he also believed the converse: resistance to psychoanalysis suggested that it was being taken seriously. For Freud, psychoanalysis was so deeply subversive of common-sense ways of thinking about the world that to understand it was to resist it. It was for this reason that Freud wrote that “ the final decisive battle” for psycho­ analysis would be played out “ where the greatest resistance has been displayed.” 2 By 1914, it was already clear that it was in France, country of Mes­ mer, Bernheim, Charcot, Bergson, and Janet, with its long literary tradition of exquisite sensitivity to the psychological, that resistance to psychoanalysis was the greatest. French philosophers preferred Henri Bergson, the French Church found it morally unacceptable, and French scientists found it shabby. Only the surrealists, who distorted and poet­ icized the theory to their taste and almost beyond Freud’s recognition, had anything good to say about psychoanalysis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Paper to Be Presented at the 6Th European CHEIRON Meeting in Brighton^England, 2-6 September 1987. Research Was Funded
    Propriety of the Erich Fromm Document Center. For personal use only. Citation or publication of material prohibited without express written permission of the copyright holder. Eigentum des Erich Fromm Dokumentationszentrums. Nutzung nur für persönliche Zwecke. Veröffentlichungen – auch von Teilen – bedürfen der schriftlichen Erlaubnis des Rechteinhabers. "INSTINCTS" AND THE "FORCES OF PRODUCTION": The Freud-Marx Debates in Eastern and Central Europe* Dr. Ferenc Eros Institute of Psychology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest In his essay "Psychology and Art Today", the British-American poet Wystan Hugh Auden writes: Both Freud and Marx start from the failures of civiliza tion, one from the poof, one from the ill. Both see human behavior determined, not consciously, but by instinctive needs, hunger and love. Both desire a world where rational choice and self-determination are possible. The difference between them is the inev itable difference between the man who studies crowds in the street, and the man who sees the patient... in the consulting room- Marx sees the direction of the relations between the outer and inner world from without inwards. Freud vice-versa.... The socialist accuses the psychologist of caving in to the status quo, trying to adapt the neurotic to the system, thus depriving him of a potential revolutionary; the psychologist retorts that the socialist is trying to lift himself by his own boot tags, that he fails to understand himself or the fact that lust for money is only one form of the lust for power; and so that after he has won his power by revolution he will recreate the same conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Models Interventions and Catchwords Theodor W. Adorno
    EuRoPEAN PERSPECTIVES A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism Lawrence D. Kritzman, Editor Critical Models Interventions and Catchwords European Perspectives presents English translations of books by leading European thinkers. With both classic and outstanding contemporary works, the series aims to shape the major intellectual controversies of our day and to facilitate the tasks of his­ torical understanding. Julia Kristeva Strangers to Ourselves Theodor W. Adorno Notes to Literature, vols.1 and 2 Richard Wolin, editor The Heidegger Controversy Antonio Gramsci Prison Notebooks, vols. 1 and 2 Jacques LeGoff History and Memory Alain Finkielkraut Remembering in Vain: The Klaus Barbie Trial and Crimes Against Humanity Julia Krist eva Nations Without Nationalism Pierre Bourdieu The Field of Cultural Production Theodor W. Adorno Pierre Vidal-Naquet Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust Translated and with a Preface Hugo Ball Critique of the German Intelligentsia by Henry W Pickford Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari What Is Philosophy? Karl Heinz Bohrer Suddenness: On the Moment of Aesthetic Appearance Alain Finkielkraut The Defeat of the Mind Julia Krist eva New Maladies of the Soul Elisabeth Badinter XY: On Masculine Identity Karl Lowith Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism Gilles Deleuze Negotiations, 1972-1990 Pierre Vidal-Naquet The jews: History, Memory, and the Present Norbert Elias The Germans Louis Althusser Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan Elisabeth Roudinesco jacques Lacan: His Life and Work Ross Guberman julia Kristeva Interviews Kelly Oliver The Portable Kristeva Pierra Nora Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 1: Conflicts and Divisions, vol. 2: Traditions, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Transference Unconscious 33-65
    Language and Psychoanalysis ISSN 2049-324X Volume 6, Issue 1, 2017 Editors Laura A. Cariola, University of Edinburgh, UK Matthias Schwannnauer, University of Edinburgh, UK Andrew Wilson, Lancaster University, UK Editorial Advisory Board Prof. Michael Buchholz, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Germany Prof. Adrienne Harris, New York University, USA Prof. Dianne Hunter, Trinity College, USA Prof. Horst Kächele, International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Germany Prof. Henry (Zvi) Lothane, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, USA Prof. Fionn Murtagh, De Montfort University, UK Prof. Ian Parker, Discourse Unit, UK Prof. Riccardo Steiner, British Psychoanalytic Society, UK Prof. Carlo Strenger, Tel Aviv University, Israel Prof. Ruth Wodak, Lancaster University, UK Editorial Contact Address: University of Edinburgh Lancaster University Old Medical School County South Edinburgh EH8 9AG Lancaster LA1 4YT United Kingdom United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Scope The journal of Language and Psychoanalysis is a fully peer reviewed online journal that publishes twice a year. It is the only interdisciplinary journal with a strong focus on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of language and psychoanalysis. The journal is also inclusive and not narrowly confined to the Freudian psychoanalytic theory. We welcome a wide range of original contributions that further the understanding of the interaction between Linguistic Analysis and Theory & Psychoanalytic Theories and Techniques. Any relevant manuscripts with an emphasis on language and psychoanalysis will be considered, including papers on methodology, theory, philosophy, child development, psychopathology, psychotherapy, embodied cognition, cognitive science, applied dynamical system theory, consciousness studies, cross- cultural research, and case studies. The journal also publishes short research reports, book reviews, interviews, obituaries, and readers’ comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism”, Chapter 3 from the Book Creating Literary Analysis (Index.Html) (V
    This is “Writing about Character and Motivation: Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism”, chapter 3 from the book Creating Literary Analysis (index.html) (v. 1.0). This book is licensed under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/) license. See the license for more details, but that basically means you can share this book as long as you credit the author (but see below), don't make money from it, and do make it available to everyone else under the same terms. This content was accessible as of December 29, 2012, and it was downloaded then by Andy Schmitz (http://lardbucket.org) in an effort to preserve the availability of this book. Normally, the author and publisher would be credited here. However, the publisher has asked for the customary Creative Commons attribution to the original publisher, authors, title, and book URI to be removed. Additionally, per the publisher's request, their name has been removed in some passages. More information is available on this project's attribution page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/attribution.html?utm_source=header). For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/). You can browse or download additional books there. i Chapter 3 Writing about Character and Motivation: Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Understand the varieties of psychoanalytic literary theories. 2. Apply a psychoanalytic theory to a literary work. 3. Engage in the writing process of a peer writer, including peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law Richard E
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 54 | Issue 3 Article 9 Summer 6-1-1997 Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law Richard E. Redding Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Richard E. Redding, Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law, 54 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1119 (1997), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol54/iss3/9 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law LACAN AND THE SUBJECT OF LAW: TOWARD A PSYCHOANALYTIC CRITI- CAL LEGAL THEORY. By David S. Caudill. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997. 206 pp. $15.95 paper, $49.95 cloth. Reviewed by Richard E. Redding The debate continues over the merits of French psychoanalytic theorist Jacques Lacan - was he a "charlatan"' or an "intellectual hero?"2 Enter David Caudill's book, Lacan and the Subject oftaw: Toward a Psychoana- lytic CriticalLegal Theory.3 In providing practical applications of Lacan to the law, the book will no doubt be seen as an important contribution in resolving the debate. Caudill, a law professor with a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclical Influences on Financial Reporting Regulation and Practice in Romania
    ACCOUNTING, MODERNISATION AND TIME: CYCLICAL INFLUENCES ON FINANCIAL REPORTING REGULATION AND PRACTICE IN ROMANIA By Nicolae-Ionut Bertalan Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management at Royal Holloway, University of London February 2019 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I, Nicolae Ionut Bertalan, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Nicolae Ionut Bertalan Date: 08-02-2019 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my supervisor Christopher Napier and my advisor Professor Chris Nobes. Their guidance has helped me write the best possible dissertation that I could manage. Professor Christopher Napier, in particular, was more patient than he should have been with me and held more meetings than I can count during a four-year period. I also want to thank everyone who made it possible for me to get to this point and all those who assisted me in collecting the data used in this dissertation. And for DFID for granting me physical access to their archive for consultation. This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support from Royal Holloway, University of London, which supported me with a maintenance scholarship. I am most grateful for this support. Christopher Napier has read and commented on all parts of this dissertation for which I am extremely grateful. Signed: Nicolae Ionut Bertalan Date: 08-02-2019 3 ABSTRACT The general purpose of this research is to identify, explain and theorise into how the transition to Western financial reporting happened after 1989 in former communist countries based on the case study of Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communism
    RESEARCH REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : THE TRAGICOMEDY OF ROMANIAN COMMUNIS M AUTHOR : Vladimir Tismanean u CONTRACTOR : Foreign Policy Researc h Institute PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 903-0 4 DATE : September, 198 9 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . a NOTE This report, based on an article to be published i n Eastern EuropeanPolitics andSocieties, is an inciden- tal product of the Council Contract identified on the title page . It is not the Final Report, which wa s distributed in August, 1989 . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Stalin's Romanian Disciples 1 1 The Comintern and the RCP 1 6 Stalinism for All Seasons 3 4 The Anti-De-Stalinization Platform 3 9 The Road to Absolute Power 43 The Manipulated Manipulator 47 Assault on the Party Apparatus 5 2 Notes 57 The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communis m Vladimir Tismanean u Un monde sans tyrans serait aussi ennuyeux qu'un jardi n zoologique sans hyenes . E . M . Cioran, Histoire et utopi e Now, despite eternal cabals in the inner clique and unendin g shifts of personnel, with their tremendous accumulation o f hatred, bitterness, and personal resentment, the Leader' s position can remain secure against chaotic palace revolution s not because of his superior gifts, about which the men in hi s intimate surroundings frequently have no great illusions, bu t because of these men's sincere and sensible conviction tha t without him everything would be immediately lost .
    [Show full text]
  • “FRANCE DESERVES to BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS in MARINE LE PEN's NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY Submitted By
    THESIS “FRANCE DESERVES TO BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS IN MARINE LE PEN’S NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY Submitted by Lauren Seitz Department of Communication Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2020 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Karrin Anderson Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager Courtenay Daum Copyright by Lauren Nicole Seitz 2020 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT “FRANCE DESERVES TO BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS IN MARINE LE PEN’S NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY This thesis employs constitutive rhetoric to analyze French far-right politician Marine Le Pen’s discourse. Focusing on ten of Le Pen’s speeches given between 2015 and 2019, I argue that Le Pen made use of Kenneth Burke’s steps of scapegoating and purification as a way to rewrite French national identity and constitute herself as a revolutionary political leader. Le Pen first identified with the subjects and system that she scapegoats. Next, she cast out elites, globalists, and immigrants, identifying them as scapegoats of France’s contemporary identity split. Finally, by disidentifying with the scapegoats, Le Pen constituted her followers as always already French patriots and herself as her leader. This allowed her to propose a new form of French national identity that was undergirded by far-right ideals and discourse of revolution. This thesis presents several implications for understanding contemporary French national identity, the far right, and women politicians. It also contributes to the project of internationalizing public address research in Communication Studies. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, thank you to my advisor, Kari Anderson. I truly could not have completed this thesis without your guidance, encouragement, and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real and the Gaze of Jacques Lacan
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation 2019 The Real and the Gaze of Jacques Lacan John S. Hendrix Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons The Real and the Gaze of Jacques Lacan John Shannon Hendrix The third category of the psyche in Lacanian psychoanalysis is the real (réel), which is neither imaginary nor symbolic in conscious or unconscious thought, and which is inaccessible to psychoanalysis itself. The real is not reality in either a conceptual or phenomenological sense, which is the sym- bolic and the imaginary: it is only proposed as an algebraic concept, as it cannot be conceived. It exists as an absence in the symbolic order (lan- guage), as the unconscious exists as an absence in conscious thought. Non- presence can be seen in the real of Lacan, and the gaze, in the dialectic be- tween the imaginary and the symbolic, and in the Hegelian dialectic between subjective and objective spirit. The real of Lacan is exterior to the symbolic, and cannot be represented by the symbolic, and yet the real has an effect on the symbolic, as the unconscious has an effect on conscious thought. The real is the inability of the signifier in language to relate to the signified, the im- possibility of meaning in language, and the impossibility of the subject. In every attempt that the subject makes to represent itself in language or percep- tion, according to Lacan, something is missed, or left behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles De Gaulle's Idea of Europe. the Lasting Legacy
    LAURENT WARLOUZET Charles de Gaulle’s Idea of Europe. The Lasting Legacy Charles de Gaulle, the French President from 1959 to 1969, developed a very specific vision of Europe, which was ap- plied boldly when he was in charge. His ideas have had a lasting legacy on many historians –and not only in France- who have adopted a “de Gaulle-centered” approach to the History of Europe in the 1960s. By Laurent Warlouzet was based on a widespread belief among French policy- Two recent books on European history in the 1960s are makers and observers that France, notwithstanding her entitled “ The Gaullist Challenge” (Ludlow, 2005; Ellison, post-colonial decline, was still bound to play a leading 2007) . They have been written by English-language role in international affairs in the post-war era. The academics and are a sign of the crucial and enduring organisation of Europe through international organisa- role that is attributed to the former French president tions such as the EEC played a major role in this. In de Charles de Gaulle in such historical studies even out- Gaulle’s speeches and writings he advocated the devel- side of France. This article aims to show that this central opment of an intergovernmental Europe where the - but perhaps also excessive - position of a personality nation-state remained intact, and in opposition to the like de Gaulle is linked both to his own personal in- federal principles that some of France’s European part- volvement in trying to stage a cult around his own role ners were advocating. In his view, Europe should be in French history, and a tendency for historians of po- under French leadership in terms of foreign policy, and litical history to adopt a heroic approach, that is, to seek European cooperation should become a lever for French out heros and villains in their stories.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Structuralism. Vol. 2
    DJFHKJSD History of Structuralism Volume 2 This page intentionally left blank History of Structuralism Volume 2: The Sign Sets, 1967-Present Francois Dosse Translated by Deborah Glassman University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges financial assistance provided by the French Ministry of Culture for the translation of this book. Copyright 1997 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota Originally published as Histoire du structuralisme, 11. Le chant du cygne, de 1967 anos jour«; Copyright Editions La Decouverte, Paris, 1992. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press III Third Avenue South, Suite 290, Minneapolis, MN 554°1-2520 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper http://www.upress.umn.edu First paperback edition, 1998 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dosse, Francois, 1950- [Histoire du structuralisme. English] History of structuralism I Francois Dosse ; translated by Deborah Glassman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: v. 1. The rising sign, 1945-1966-v. 2. The sign sets, 1967-present. ISBN 0-8166-2239-6 (v. I: he: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2241-8 (v. I: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2370-8 (v. 2: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2371-6 (v. 2: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2240-X (set: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2254-X (set: pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • Jung on Astrology
    Jung on Astrology Jung on Astrology brings together C. G. Jung’s thoughts on astrology in a single volume for the fi rst time, signifi cantly adding to our understanding of his work. Jung’s Collected Works , seminars, and letters contain numerous discussions of this ancient divinatory system, and Jung himself used astrological horoscopes as a diagnostic tool in his analytic practice. Understood in terms of his own psychology as a symbolic representation of the archetypes of the collective unconscious, Jung found in astrology a wealth of spiritual and psychological meaning and suggested it represents the “sum of all the psychological knowledge of antiquity.” The selections and editorial introductions by Safron Rossi and Keiron Le Grice address topics that were of critical importance to Jung – such as the archetypal symbolism in astrology, the precession of the equinoxes and astrological ages, astrology as a form of synchronicity and acausal correspondence, the qualitative nature of time, and the experience of astrological fate – allowing readers to assess astrology’s place within the larger corpus of Jung’s work and its value as a source of symbolic meaning for our time. The book will be of great interest to analytical psychologists, Jungian psy- chotherapists, and academics and students of depth psychology and Jungian and post-Jungian studies, as well as to astrologers and therapists of other orientations, especially transpersonal. Safron Rossi, PhD, is a Professor of mythology and depth psychology in the Jungian and Archetypal Studies specialization at Pacifi ca Graduate Institute, Cali- fornia. For many years she was curator of the Joseph Campbell and James Hillman manuscript collections.
    [Show full text]