En En Amendments

European Parliament 2014 - 2019

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

PE560.742v01–00

16.6.2015

AMENDMENTS 1 - 185

Draft motion for a resolution Claude Moraes (PE557.263v01–00)

European Agenda on Security

AM\1065532EN.doc PE560.742v01–00

EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_NonLegRE

PE560.742v01–00 2/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 1 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to Articles 2, 3, 6, 7 and deleted 21 of the Treaty on European Union and to Articles 4, 16, 20, 67, 68, 70 - 72, 75, 82 - 87 and 88 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Or. en

Amendment 2 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to the Charter of deleted Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Articles 6, 7, 8, 10(1), 11, 12, 21, 47 - 50, 52 and 53 thereof,

Or. en

Amendment 3 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to the Charter of — having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Articles 6, 7, 8, Union, and in particular Articles 1, 4, 6, 7,

AM\1065532EN.doc 3/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN 10(1), 11, 12, 21, 47 - 50, 52 and 53 8, 10(1), 11, 12, 19, 21, 47 - 50, 52 and 53 thereof, thereof,

Or. en

Amendment 4 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the conventions, recommendations, resolutions and reports of the Parliamentary Assembly, the Committee of Ministers, the Human Rights Commissioner and the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe;

Or. en

Amendment 5 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 27 February 2014 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2012);

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 4/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 6 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regards to its resolution on the US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and impact on EU citizens' fundamental rights (P7_TA- PROV(2014)0230);

Or. en

Amendment 7 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2 d (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Communications from the Commission on the Strategy for the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Union (COM(2010)0573) and the Operational Guidance on taking account of Fundamental Rights in Commission Impact Assessments (SEC(2011)0567),

Or. en

Amendment 8 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 2 e (new)

AM\1065532EN.doc 5/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 April 2014 in joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 (Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others), which annulled Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC,

Or. en

Amendment 9 Sophia in 't Veld, Gérard Deprez

Draft motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution (2010/2311(INI)) of 20 July 2011 on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges;

Or. en

Amendment 10 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Recital -A (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

-A. whereas security policies can not be developed independently of the economic

PE560.742v01–00 6/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN and social context both at European and international level and should therefore be developed as part of a comprehensive approach;

Or. en

Amendment 11 Cornelia Ernst

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the threats to the Union's deleted internal security have become more complex, hybrid, international, rapidly evolving and fluid in nature, going beyond the capacity of any individual Member State and therefore require more than ever a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated EU response;

Or. en

Amendment 12 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 7/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 13 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the threats to the Union's A. whereas the threats to the internal internal security have become more security of European countries has complex, hybrid, international, rapidly become more complex, hybrid, evolving and fluid in nature, going beyond international, rapidly evolving and fluid in the capacity of any individual Member nature, and therefore requires more than State and therefore require more than ever ever a coherent, comprehensive and a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated coordinated response amongst all the EU response; democracies and their allies;

Or. en

Amendment 14 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Barbara Spinelli

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the threats to the Union's A. whereas the threats to the Union's internal security have become more internal security have become more complex, hybrid, international, rapidly complex, hybrid, international, rapidly evolving and fluid in nature, going beyond evolving and fluid in nature, going beyond the capacity of any individual Member the capacity of any individual Member State and therefore require more than ever State and therefore require more than ever a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated a coherent, comprehensive and coordinated EU response; EU response and between its Member States ; whereas, despite some evolution in the gravity of threats, the root causes of these threats have been known for many years, amongst which are the increasingly repressive responses, the increasing military involvement in sovereign states that has led to the appearance or strengthening of conflict zones and upheavals in states in the immediate vicinity to the EU ; whereas this proposed

PE560.742v01–00 8/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN agenda does not provide a complete and reliable analysis of threats and their causes, nor does it entails an assessment of existing measures and instruments, and is therefore not a proper basis for the different operational priorities and measures proposed by the Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 15 Eleftherios Synadinos

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 16 Barbara Matera, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1065532EN.doc 9/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN EU response; comprehensive, multi-layered and coordinated EU response;

Or. en

Amendment 17 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

A a. Whereas the Commission proposal on European Agenda on security for the period 2015-2020 is partially based on the recent terrorist attacks of early 2015, in which the lack of cooperation and exchange of information between the various police and intelligence services, both within and between EU Member States, played a central role;

Or. en

Amendment 18 Axel Voss, Artis Pabriks

Draft motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

A a. Whereas modern security depends largely on developments and complexity of data analysis because of the increasing mobility of terrorist and organised crime and therefore requires a stronger and better analysis of bank data, travel data and communications data;

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 10/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 19 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas ensuring the safety and B. whereas ensuring the safety and freedom of European citizens is a shared freedom of citizens is a responsibility of responsibility of the Union and the Member States which calls for coordinated Member States which calls for coordinated and aligned efforts by all Member States, and aligned efforts by all Member States, civil society and law enforcement EU Institutions and Agencies, civil authorities, geared towards common goals society and law enforcement authorities, and priorities; geared towards common goals and priorities and following shared principles; whereas in order to deliver optimal results, the concrete implementation of these shared goals and priorities should be associated with clear division of tasks between the EU level and national level and with strong and effective parliamentary democratic oversight;

Or. en

Amendment 20 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas ensuring the safety and B. whereas ensuring the safety and freedom of European citizens is a shared freedom of their citizens is primarily the responsibility of the Union and the responsibility of the Member States but Member States which calls for coordinated which calls for cooperative efforts between and aligned efforts by all Member States, Member States, EU Institutions and EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society Agencies, civil society and law and law enforcement authorities, geared enforcement authorities, geared towards towards common goals and priorities and common goals and priorities and following following shared principles; whereas in shared principles without infringing on order to deliver optimal results, the national sovereignty; whereas in order to concrete implementation of these shared deliver optimal results, the concrete goals and priorities should be associated implementation of these shared goals and

AM\1065532EN.doc 11/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN with clear division of tasks between the EU priorities should be associated with clear level and national level and with strong division of tasks between the EU level and and effective parliamentary democratic our governments and with strong and oversight; effective parliamentary democratic oversight;

Or. en

Amendment 21 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas ensuring the safety and B. whereas the development of an EU freedom of European citizens is a shared security policy is a shared responsibility of responsibility of the Union and the the Union and the Member States which Member States which calls for coordinated calls for coordinated and aligned efforts by and aligned efforts by all Member States, all Member States, EU Institutions and EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society Agencies based on the Rule of Law, and law enforcement authorities, geared respect for fundamental rights, and towards common goals and priorities and solidarity; whereas in order to deliver following shared principles; whereas in optimal results, the concrete order to deliver optimal results, the implementation of these shared goals and concrete implementation of these shared priorities should be associated with clear goals and priorities should be associated division of tasks between the EU level and with clear division of tasks between the EU national level and with strong and effective level and national level and with strong and parliamentary democratic and judicial effective parliamentary democratic oversight; oversight;

Or. en

Amendment 22 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas ensuring the safety and B. whereas ensuring the safety of European

PE560.742v01–00 12/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN freedom of European citizens is a shared citizens cannot be at the expense of responsibility of the Union and the fundamental rights and liberties and is a Member States which calls for coordinated shared responsibility of the Union and the and aligned efforts by all Member States, Member States which calls for coordinated EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society and aligned efforts by all Member States, and law enforcement authorities, geared EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society towards common goals and priorities and and law enforcement authorities, geared following shared principles; whereas in towards common goals and priorities and order to deliver optimal results, the following shared principles; whereas in concrete implementation of these shared order to deliver optimal results, the goals and priorities should be associated concrete implementation of these shared with clear division of tasks between the EU goals and priorities should be associated level and national level and with strong and with clear division of tasks between the EU effective parliamentary democratic level and national level and with strong and oversight; effective parliamentary democratic oversight;

Or. en

Amendment 23 Barbara Matera, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas ensuring the safety and B. whereas creating the conditions for freedom of European citizens is a shared European citizens to live in a safe and responsibility of the Union and the democratic environment is a shared Member States which calls for coordinated responsibility of the Union and the and aligned efforts by all Member States, Member States which calls for coordinated EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society and aligned efforts by all Member States, and law enforcement authorities, geared EU Institutions and Agencies, civil society towards common goals and priorities and and law enforcement authorities, geared following shared principles; whereas in towards common goals and priorities and order to deliver optimal results, the following shared principles; whereas in concrete implementation of these shared order to deliver optimal results, the goals and priorities should be associated concrete implementation of these shared with clear division of tasks between the EU goals and priorities should be associated level and national level and with strong and with clear division of tasks between the EU effective parliamentary democratic level and national level, on the basis of the oversight; principle of subsidiarity and with strong and effective parliamentary democratic oversight;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 13/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 24 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B a. Whereas the national security exception included in Article 4 TFEU cannot be used to allow national security agencies to infringe on the (economic) interests of other Member States, their citizens' and residents' rights and the laws and policies of the European Union and third countries more generally

Or. en

Amendment 25 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital B b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

B b. Recalls the need to learn the lessons from the many breaches of European and universal norms and values in the context of internal and external security cooperation post-9/11;

Or. en

Amendment 26 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C

PE560.742v01–00 14/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas striking the right balance C. whereas freedom, security and justice between prevention policies and repressive are objectives that must be pursued in measures is strongly needed in order to parallel, and whereas, in order to achieve guarantee that the fundamental rights are freedom and justice, security measures respected and that the area of freedom, should therefore always be evidence- security and justice is preserved; based, in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and respect for fundamental rights and on the basis of proper democratic oversight and accountability; and whereas striking the right balance between prevention policies and repressive measures is strongly needed in order to guarantee that the fundamental rights are respected and that the area of freedom, security and justice is preserved;

Or. en

Amendment 27 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas striking the right balance C. whereas striking the right balance between prevention policies and repressive between prevention policies and repressive measures is strongly needed in order to measures is strongly needed in order to guarantee that the fundamental rights are guarantee that basic human rights are respected and that the area of freedom, respected and that the area of freedom, security and justice is preserved; security and justice is preserved;

Or. en

Amendment 28 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C

AM\1065532EN.doc 15/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas striking the right balance C. whereas in order to guarantee that the between prevention policies and fundamental rights are respected and repressive measures is strongly needed in guaranteed, and an open and democratic order to guarantee that the fundamental European Union is preserved, a focus on rights are respected and that the area of the prevention of crime is needed and freedom, security and justice is preserved; legally mandated necessary and proportionate repressive measures should only be taken as a last resort;

Or. en

Amendment 29 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas striking the right balance C. whereas in order to develop and between prevention policies and repressive implement an effective internal security measures is strongly needed in order to program it is imperative to strike a balance guarantee that the fundamental rights are between prevention policies and repressive respected and that the area of freedom, measures, guaranteeing respect for security and justice is preserved; human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law within the area of freedom, security and justice; whereas the justice dimension is taken into account only marginally in the Commission proposal and only from the criminal point of view;

Or. en

Amendment 30 Barbara Matera

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C

PE560.742v01–00 16/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas striking the right balance C. whereas striking the right balance between prevention policies and repressive between prevention policies and repressive measures is strongly needed in order to measures is strongly needed in order to guarantee that the fundamental rights are guarantee that the fundamental rights are respected and that the area of freedom, respected and that the area of freedom, security and justice is preserved; security and justice is duly preserved;

Or. en

Amendment 31 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C a. whereas the prevention aspect of this programme is particularly essential in a period of growing economic and social inequities undermining the social pact and the effectiveness of fundamental rights and public freedoms; whereas alternative measures to prison on the one hand and reintegration measures on the other, in particular regarding small offenses, should be an important element of such prevention policies;

Or. en

Amendment 32 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

C a. Whereas a number of the root causes of crime such as increasing inequality,

AM\1065532EN.doc 17/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN poverty and racial and xenophobic violence cannot be addressed by security measures alone, but need to be addressed in a wider policy context, including social, employment, educational, cultural and external policies

Or. en

Amendment 33 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Recital D

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

D. whereas upon the expiry of the D. whereas upon the expiry of the transitional period provided for in Protocol transitional period provided for in Protocol 36 annexed to the Treaties the Commission 36 annexed to the Treaties the Commission and the European Court of Justice have and the European Court of Justice have obtained full powers with respect to the regrettably obtained full powers with former third pillar legal instruments, which respect to the former third pillar legal instruments play an important role in the instruments, which instruments play an area of freedom, security and justice; important role in the area of freedom, security and justice;

Or. en

Amendment 34 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital D

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

D. whereas upon the expiry of the D. whereas upon the expiry of the transitional period provided for in Protocol transitional period provided for in Protocol 36 annexed to the Treaties the Commission 36 annexed to the Treaties the Commission and the European Court of Justice have and the European Court of Justice have obtained full powers with respect to the obtained full powers with respect to the former third pillar legal instruments, which former third pillar legal instruments, instruments play an important role in the expanding the democratic and area of freedom, security and justice; fundamental rights accountability over

PE560.742v01–00 18/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN measures taken that have played an important role in shaping the area of freedom, security and justice;

Or. en

Amendment 35 Michael Gahler, Arnaud Danjean

Draft motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. E. whereas the boundaries between internal and external security are becoming more and more blurred which requires stronger cooperation and coordination between Member States resulting in a comprehensive and multidimensional approac;

Or. en

Amendment 36 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. Whereas the use of encryption is an important safeguard and security measure for individuals to protect themselves against mass surveillance and criminal activity, for them to be able to exercise their fundamental rights within the EU as well as third countries, as well as an important tool to increase trust in the online environment; the right to use encryption should therefore not be infringed under the pretext of the fight against crime;

AM\1065532EN.doc 19/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Or. en

Amendment 37 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. whereas cybercrime and cyber- facilitated crime affect the security of EU citizens, the internal market and the intellectual property and prosperity of the European Unions; whereas for example botnets affect millions of computers and thousands of targets at the same time;

Or. en

Amendment 38 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. Notes the adopted European Agenda on Agenda on Security for the period 2015- Security for the period 2015-2020 by the 2020 by the Commission and the priorities Commission and the priorities set out in it; set out in it; considers that, in view of the considers that, in view of the challenges challenges the European Union is currently the European Union is currently facing, facing , terrorism, cross-border organised islamic terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at threats which require coordinated actions at Union level; Nation State level;

Or. en

Amendment 39 Monika Hohlmeier

PE560.742v01–00 20/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 40 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. Emphasises that the prime Agenda on Security for the period 2015- responsibility for the security of their 2020 by the Commission and the priorities citizens rests with the Member States and set out in it; considers that, in view of the that the EU should act to facilitate this; challenges the European Union is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at Union level;

Or. en

Amendment 41 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

AM\1065532EN.doc 21/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. Welcomes the adopted European Agenda on Security for the period 2015- Agenda on Security for the period 2015- 2020 by the Commission and the priorities 2020 by the Commission and the priorities set out in it; considers that, in view of the set out in it; considers that, in view of the challenges the European Union is currently challenges the European Union is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at threats which require coordinated actions at Union level; Union level; Reiterates the need to further investigate and address the root causes of crime, including growing inequality, poverty, discrimination and (perceptions) about unfairness in the foreign policies of the EU and its Member States; furthermore stress the need to ensure adequate resources for social workers, local police officers and judicial officials whose budgets have been slashed due to austerity measures;

Or. en

Amendment 42 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 22/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 43 Eleftherios Synadinos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 44 Soraya Post, Marita Ulvskog, Anna Hedh

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. Welcomes the adopted European Agenda on Security for the period 2015- Agenda on Security for the period 2015- 2020 by the Commission and the priorities 2020 by the Commission and the priorities set out in it; considers that, in view of the set out in it; considers that, in view of the challenges the European Union is currently challenges the European Union is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at threats which require coordinated actions at Union level; Union level; calls on the Commission to add violence against women to these priorities as this violence is a threat against the freedom and security of half of the population of the European Union that has severe effects on womens health, quality of life and possibilities to participate in society and therefore constitues a breach of womens fundamental rights;

AM\1065532EN.doc 23/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN (Rationale: Quote from the EU-wide survey of the Fundamental Rights Agency on violence against women 2014 (results at a glance, p.11): The scale of physical and sexual violence experienced by women across the EU calls for renewed policy attention. Some 8 % of women have experienced physical and/or sexual violence in the last 12 months before the survey interview, and one in three women has experienced some form of physical and/or sexual assault since the age of 15.)

Or. en

Amendment 45 Axel Voss

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. Welcomes the adopted European Agenda on Security for the period 2015- Agenda on Security for the period 2015- 2020 by the Commission and the priorities 2020 by the Commission and the priorities set out in it; considers that, in view of the set out in it; considers that, in view of the challenges the European Union is currently challenges the European Union is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at threats which require coordinated actions at Union level; Union level; in this regard notes that the European Agenda on Security should be structured in a flexible way to respond to new challenges;

Or. en

Amendment 46 Barbara Matera, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

PE560.742v01–00 24/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 47 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 48 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

AM\1065532EN.doc 25/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the adopted European 1. takes note of the proposal on European Agenda on Security for the period 2015- Agenda on Security for the period 2015- 2020 by the Commission and the priorities 2020 by the Commission and the priorities set out in it; considers that, in view of the set out in it; considers that, in view of the challenges the European Union is currently challenges the European Union is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions at threats which require coordinated actions at Union level; Union level;

Or. en

Amendment 49 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. Calls for the right balance to be sought between prevention policies and repressive measures in order to preserve freedom, security and justice; stresses that security measures should always be pursued in accordance with the principles of the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights such as the right to privacy and data protection, freedom of expression and association and due process; calls on the Commission, therefore, when implementing the new ISS, to take due account of the recent Court of Justice ruling on the data retention directive, which requires all instruments to comply with the principles of proportionality, necessity and legality, and to include the appropriate safeguards of accountability and judicial redress;

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 26/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 50 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. Notes the adopted European Agenda on Security for the period 2015-2020 by the Commission and the priorities set out in it; considers that, in view of the challenges Europe is currently facing , terrorism, cross-border organised crime and cybercrime are the most serious threats which require coordinated actions between Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 51 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. recalls that in order to be a credible actor in promoting fundamental rights both internally and outside, the European Union should base its security policies, the fight against terrorism and the fight against organized crime and partnerships with third countries in the field of security on a comprehensive approach that integrates all the factors leading people to engage in terrorism or in organized crime and thus integrate economic and social policies, elaborated and implemented in full respect of fundamental rights and requires judicial and democratic control and circumstantial evaluations;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 27/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 52 Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel, Sophia in 't Veld, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Robert Rochefort, Cecilia Wikström, Nathalie Griesbeck

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. Regrets that despite the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon which allows EU intervention in matters of freedom, security and justice, a real European governance of this space has not yet been established.

Or. en

Amendment 53 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

1 b. deplores the weakness of the analysis of the causes of terrorism proposed by the Commission, and regrets that it takes into account a small part of terrorist acts by overevaluating and misrepresenting the external dimension of these acts; condemns any analysis fostering confusion between terrorism, insecurity, Islam and migrants;

Or. en

Amendment 54 Javier Nart, Fernando Maura Barandiarán

PE560.742v01–00 28/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Notes with satisfaction that the 2. Notes with satisfaction that the Commission adhered to Parliament's calls Commission adhered to Parliament's calls to base the Agenda on Security on the to base the Agenda on Security on the principles of respect of fundamental rights, principles of respect of fundamental rights, more transparency and democratic more transparency and democratic oversight, fully use of existing EU oversight, fully use of existing EU instruments and comprehensive approach instruments and comprehensive approach to security; supports the key principles to security; supports the key principles formulated by the Commission as formulated by the Commission as fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, namely the full compliance with namely the full compliance with fundamental rights, more transparency, fundamental rights, more transparency, accountability and democratic control, accountability and democratic control, better application and implementation of better application and implementation of existing legal instruments, more joined-up existing legal instruments, more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, and greater link between the internal and and greater link between the internal and external dimensions of security; calls on external dimensions of security; stresses the Commission and on the Council to that the boundaries between external and strictly comply with them in the internal security are becoming more and implementation of the Agenda; points out more blurred; calls, therefore, for that the Parliament will put these principles enhanced coherence between external at the core of its monitoring of the and internal instruments;calls on the Agenda's implementation; Commission and on the Council to strictly comply with them in the implementation of the Agenda; points out that the Parliament will put these principles at the core of its monitoring of the Agenda's implementation;

Or. en

Amendment 55 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Notes with satisfaction that the 2. Notes with satisfaction that the Commission adhered to Parliament's calls Commission adhered to Parliament's calls

AM\1065532EN.doc 29/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN to base the Agenda on Security on the to base the Agenda on Security on the principles of respect of fundamental rights, principles of respect of fundamental rights, more transparency and democratic more transparency and democratic oversight, fully use of existing EU oversight, fully use of existing EU instruments and comprehensive approach instruments and comprehensive approach to security; supports the key principles to security; notes the key principles formulated by the Commission as formulated by the Commission as fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, namely the full compliance with namely the full compliance with fundamental rights, more transparency, fundamental rights, more transparency, accountability and democratic control, accountability and democratic control, better application and implementation of better application and implementation of existing legal instruments, more joined-up existing legal instruments, more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, and greater link between the internal and and greater link between the internal and external dimensions of security; calls on external dimensions of security; calls on the Commission and on the Council to the Commission and on the Council to strictly comply with them in the strictly comply with them in the implementation of the Agenda; points out implementation of the Agenda; points out that the Parliament will put these principles that the Parliament will put these principles at the core of its monitoring of the at the core of its monitoring of the Agenda's implementation; Agenda's implementation;

Or. en

Amendment 56 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Notes with satisfaction that the 2. Welcomes the Commission's Commission adhered to Parliament's calls commitment to adhere to fundamental to base the Agenda on Security on the rights, more transparency and democratic principles of respect of fundamental rights, oversight, fully use of existing EU more transparency and democratic instruments and comprehensive approach oversight, fully use of existing EU to security; supports the key principles instruments and comprehensive approach formulated by the Commission as to security; supports the key principles fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, formulated by the Commission as namely the full compliance with fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, fundamental rights, more transparency, namely the full compliance with accountability and democratic control, fundamental rights, more transparency, better application and implementation of accountability and democratic control, existing legal instruments, more joined-up better application and implementation of inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach,

PE560.742v01–00 30/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN existing legal instruments, more joined-up and greater link between the internal and inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, external dimensions of security; calls on and greater link between the internal and the Commission and on the Council to external dimensions of security; calls on strictly comply with them in the the Commission and on the Council to implementation of the Agenda in strictly comply with them in the particular through proper judicial implementation of the Agenda; points out oversight; points out that the Parliament that the Parliament will put these principles will put these principles at the core of its at the core of its monitoring of the monitoring of the Agenda's Agenda's implementation; implementation; Calls on the Commission to swiftly propose a definition of and limits to the national security exception contained in Article 4 TFEU so as to enable proper democratic and fundamental rights accountability of security measures;

Or. en

Amendment 57 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Notes with satisfaction that the 2. Notes with satisfaction that the Commission adhered to Parliament's calls Commission adhered to Parliament's calls to base the Agenda on Security on the to base the Agenda on Security on the principles of respect of fundamental rights, principles of subsidiarity, proportionality, more transparency and democratic necessity and respect for the rule of law, oversight, fully use of existing EU fundamental rights and national legal instruments and comprehensive approach instruments, more transparency and to security; supports the key principles democratic oversight, full use of existing formulated by the Commission as EU instruments and comprehensive fundamentals of the new Security Agenda, approach to security; supports the key namely the full compliance with principles formulated by the Commission fundamental rights, more transparency, as fundamentals of the new Security accountability and democratic control, Agenda, namely the full compliance with better application and implementation of fundamental rights, more transparency, existing legal instruments, more joined-up accountability and democratic control, inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, better application and implementation of and greater link between the internal and existing legal instruments, more joined-up external dimensions of security; calls on inter-agency and cross-sectorial approach, the Commission and on the Council to and greater link between the internal and strictly comply with them in the external dimensions of security; calls on

AM\1065532EN.doc 31/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN implementation of the Agenda; points out the Commission and on the Council to that the Parliament will put these principles strictly comply with them in the at the core of its monitoring of the implementation of the Agenda; points out Agenda's implementation; that the Parliament will put these principles at the core of its monitoring of the Agenda's implementation;

Or. en

Amendment 58 Sophia in 't Veld

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2 a. Emphasises that a democratic and judicial oversight gap exists over cross- border cooperation between national intelligence agencies; expresses its concerns regarding the fact that democratic and judicial oversight is severely hampered by the third party rule regarding access to documents;

Or. en

Amendment 59 Sophia in 't Veld, Gérard Deprez

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

2 b. Considers that a further development of the role of Europol, Eurojust and a future public prosecutor should result in a system of Europe-wide law enforcement and justice, but that the elimination of weaknesses and gaps in democratic oversight is an absolute precondition for that development;

PE560.742v01–00 32/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 60 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus 3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, and in particular the Commission's and in particular the Commission's commitment to strictly test any security commitment to strictly test any security measure not only for the extent to which it measure not only for the extent to which it achieves its objectives but also for its achieves its objectives but also for its compliance with fundamental rights; compliance with fundamental rights; suggests to the Commission to involve the underlines the need for the Commission to EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this involve the EU Agency for Fundamental assessment; looks forward to receive all Rights in this assessment; looks forward to relevant documentation on this assessment, receive all relevant documentation on this so as to be able to perform its monitoring assessment, so as to be able to perform its role effectively; monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 61 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific 3. Notes the specific focus put in the focus put in the Agenda on fundamental Agenda on fundamental rights, and in rights, and in particular the Commission's particular the Commission's commitment commitment to strictly test any security to strictly test any security measure not measure not only for the extent to which it only for the extent to which it achieves its achieves its objectives but also for its objectives but also for its compliance with compliance with fundamental rights; fundamental rights; suggests to the Commission to involve the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this assessment; looks forward to receive all relevant documentation on this

AM\1065532EN.doc 33/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN assessment, so as to be able to perform its monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 62 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific 3. Welcomes the specific focus put in the focus put in the Agenda on fundamental Agenda on fundamental rights, and in rights, and in particular the Commission's particular the Commission's commitment commitment to strictly test any security to strictly test any security measure not measure not only for the extent to which it only for the extent to which it achieves its achieves its objectives but also for its objectives but also for its compliance with compliance with fundamental rights; fundamental rights throughout the suggests to the Commission to involve the legislative process; Recalls in this regard EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this its condemnation of measures entailing assessment; looks forward to receive all the vast and systemic blanket collection of relevant documentation on this assessment, the personal data of innocent people, so as to be able to perform its monitoring particularly in view of the potentially role effectively; severe effects on fair trial rights, non- discrimination, privacy and data protection, freedom of the press thought and speech and on freedom of assembly and of association, as well as entailing a significant potential for abusive use of the information gathered against political adversaries; Expresses severe doubts concerning the usefulness of mass surveillance measures as they often cast the net too wide and therefore throw up too many false positives and negatives; Warns of the danger of mass surveillance measures obscuring the need to invest in perhaps less costly, more effective and less intrusive law enforcement measures; Insists that the Commission fully involves the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor in the fundamental rights assessment of proposals made by it or a group of Member States as still allowed

PE560.742v01–00 34/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty; looks forward to receive all relevant documentation on this assessment, so as to be able to perform its monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 63 Aldo Patriciello

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus 3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, and in particular the Commission's and in particular the Commission's commitment to strictly test any security commitment to strictly test any security measure not only for the extent to which it measure not only for the extent to which it achieves its objectives but also for its achieves its objectives but also for its compliance with fundamental rights; compliance with fundamental rights; suggests to the Commission to involve the suggests to the Commission to involve the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this assessment; looks forward to receive all assessment, in order to have an impartial relevant documentation on this assessment, opinion whether the measures adopted by so as to be able to perform its monitoring the Member States to fight terrorism pose role effectively; limits to human rights, and if the Agency considers that these measures are not appropriate, immediately informs the Commission, which will take appropriate measures to prevent their application; looks forward to receive all relevant documentation on this assessment, so as to be able to perform its monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 64 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

AM\1065532EN.doc 35/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus 3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, and in particular the Commission's and in particular the Commission's commitment to strictly test any security commitment to strictly test any security measure not only for the extent to which it measure not only for the extent to which it achieves its objectives but also for its achieves its objectives but also for its compliance with fundamental rights; compliance with fundamental rights; suggests to the Commission to involve the regrets that the assessment of existing EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this instruments are not conducted in parallel; assessment; looks forward to receive all asks the Commission to involve the EU relevant documentation on this assessment, Agency for Fundamental Rights in this so as to be able to perform its monitoring assessment; asks the European role effectively; Commission to provide all information and documentation on this assessment, so as to be able to perform its democratic and monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 65 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus 3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, and in particular the Commission's and in particular the Commission's commitment to strictly test any security commitment to strictly test any security measure not only for the extent to which it measure not only for the extent to which it achieves its objectives but also for its achieves its objectives but also for its compliance with fundamental rights; compliance with fundamental rights; suggests to the Commission to involve the suggests to the Commission to involve the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in all relevant bodies and specialised this assessment; looks forward to receive agencies in this assessment; looks forward all relevant documentation on this to receive all relevant documentation on assessment, so as to be able to perform its this assessment, so as to be able to perform monitoring role effectively; its monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 36/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 66 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 67 Sophia in 't Veld

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1065532EN.doc 37/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN deliver on its promises and present evidence for the necessity and proportionality of an EU PNR directive;

Or. en

Amendment 68 Emil Radev

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus 3. Notes with satisfaction the specific focus put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, put in the Agenda on fundamental rights, and in particular the Commission's and in particular the Commission's commitment to strictly test any security commitment to strictly test any security measure not only for the extent to which it measure not only for the extent to which it achieves its objectives but also for its achieves its objectives but also for its compliance with fundamental rights; compliance with fundamental rights; in suggests to the Commission to involve the particular, calls on the Commission to EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in this protect the freedom of movement within assessment; looks forward to receive all the EU when implementing measures relevant documentation on this assessment, related to the Agenda on Security; so as to be able to perform its monitoring suggests to the Commission to involve the role effectively; EU Agency for Fundamental Rights in its assessment; looks forward to receive all relevant documentation on this assessment, so as to be able to perform its monitoring role effectively;

Or. en

Amendment 69 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 a. Calls on the Commission to comprehensively evaluate and prove the effectiveness of profiling measures for

PE560.742v01–00 38/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN each individual serious transnational crime as a precondition for their use, given the tensions with fundamental rights and potential side effect of ostracising communities whose trust and collaboration is sought; furthermore underlines the need to further define profiling and strengthen legal safeguards particularly through the adoption of the Data Protection Package;

Or. en

Amendment 70 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 a. deeply regrets the lack of proposals for concrete measures to ensure respect for fundamental rights, data protection, transparency, democratic control, of explicit reference to the respect of the principles of necessity and proportionality in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the Union of 8 April 2014 in joined cases C-293/12 and C- 594/12 (Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others);

Or. en

Amendment 71 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that

AM\1065532EN.doc 39/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN the principle of the best interests of the child is respected in all legislation relating to security

Or. en

Amendment 72 Sophia in 't Veld

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 a. Calls upon the Commission to fully assess the impact of the Judgment in Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others, in which the Court declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid, on any instrument involving the retention of data for law enforcement purposes;

Or. en

Amendment 73 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 b. Reiterates its resolve to ensure accountability for massive violations of fundamental rights under the guise of the fight against terrorism, in particular, in the context of transportation and illegal detention of prisoners in European countries by the CIA, by means of open and transparent investigations; calls for a protection of those revealing such violations, such as journalists and whistleblowers

PE560.742v01–00 40/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 74 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 b. deeply regrets that the European Commission has not conducted a thorough and comprehensive evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of measures and actions taken as part of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) or the impact on fundamental rights and public freedoms, respect for the rule of law nor the measures taken and implemented by the Member States in the context of the ISS, having regard to the Commission's proposal will now test any measure security in terms of respect for fundamental rights and in relation to affichés5 objectives; in this regard, reitereates the call for the suspension of international agreements such as the PNR agreements with the USA and Australia, the TFTP agreement with the United States of America, the so-called "Safe Harbour" agreement and asks to suspend of all current EU legislative proposals, in particular the draft directive on EU-PNR ; recalls its opposition in particular to the EU-PNR and Smart Borders legislative proposal which constitute several threats to fundamental rights and liberties and a breach of rules of law principles, in particular of proportionality and necessity, failing to provide any proof of their effectivness in achieving the objectives set and their added value; reiterates its call for suspending negotiations on the EU PNR proposal until the ECJ has ruled on the EU- Canada PNR Agreement and the

AM\1065532EN.doc 41/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Commission has fully assessed the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 April 2014 in joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 (Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others);

Or. en

Amendment 75 Sophia in 't Veld, Gérard Deprez

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

3 b. Notes that the EU lacks an agreed definition of "national security", creating an undefined carveout in EU legal instruments which contain references to "national security";

Or. en

Amendment 76 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Believes that in order for the citizens to 4. Believes that in order for the citizens to have more confidence in the security have more confidence in security policy, policy, the EU Institutions and the the EU should stop interfering in national Member States should ensure more policies, especially those in the field of transparency, accountability and law, justice, migration and asylum. democratic control in the process of policy development and implementation; notes with satisfaction the intention of the Commission to present to the Parliament and the Council updated information on the implementation of the Agenda; reiterates its intention to organise regular

PE560.742v01–00 42/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN monitoring exercises, in cooperation with the national parliaments, on the proper implementation of the Agenda; invites the Commission to involve the Parliament in the process of developing performance indicators for key EU instruments; notes with interest the Commission's proposal to set up a EU Security Consultative Forum and looks forward to receiving more detailed information on it;

Or. en

Amendment 77 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Believes that in order for the citizens to 4. Believes that in order for the citizens to have more confidence in the security have more confidence in the security policy, the EU Institutions and the policy, the Member States should ensure Member States should ensure more more transparency, accountability and transparency, accountability and democratic control in the process of policy democratic control in the process of policy development and implementation as far as development and implementation; notes their national authorities decide; notes the with satisfaction the intention of the intention of the Commission to present to Commission to present to the Parliament the Parliament and the Council updated and the Council updated information on the information on the implementation of the implementation of the Agenda; reiterates Agenda; reiterates its intention to organise its intention to organise regular monitoring regular monitoring exercises, in exercises, in cooperation with the national cooperation with the national parliaments, parliaments, on the proper implementation on the proper implementation of the of the Agenda; invites the Commission to Agenda; invites the Commission to involve involve the Parliament in the process of the Parliament in the process of developing developing performance indicators for key performance indicators for key EU EU instruments; notes with interest the instruments; notes the Commission's Commission's proposal to set up a EU proposal to set up a EU Security Security Consultative Forum and looks Consultative Forum; forward to receiving more detailed information on it;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 43/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 78 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Believes that in order for the citizens to 4. Believes that in order for the individuals have more confidence in the security to have more confidence in law policy, the EU Institutions and the Member enforcement and for it to gain their trust States should ensure more transparency, and collaboration, the EU Institutions, accountability and democratic control in Agencies and the Member States should the process of policy development and ensure more transparency, accountability implementation; notes with satisfaction the and democratic control in the process of intention of the Commission to present to policy development and implementation; the Parliament and the Council updated welcomes the intention of the Commission information on the implementation of the to present to the Parliament and the Agenda; reiterates its intention to organise Council updated information on the regular monitoring exercises, in implementation of the Agenda; reiterates cooperation with the national parliaments, its intention to organise regular monitoring on the proper implementation of the exercises, in cooperation with the national Agenda; invites the Commission to involve parliaments, on the proper implementation the Parliament in the process of developing of the Agenda; invites the Commission to performance indicators for key EU involve the Parliament in the process of instruments; notes with interest the developing performance indicators for key Commission's proposal to set up a EU EU instruments; notes with interest the Security Consultative Forum and looks Commission's proposal to set up a EU forward to receiving more detailed Security Consultative Forum and looks information on it; forward to receiving more detailed information on it; insists that this Forum should ensure a balanced representation of all stakeholders, including Member States governments and parliaments, the European Parliament, all relevant EU agencies, representatives of civil society, academia and of the private sector;

Or. en

Amendment 79 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

PE560.742v01–00 44/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Believes that in order for the citizens to 4. Believes that in order for the citizens to have more confidence in the security have more confidence in the security policy, the EU Institutions and the Member policy, the EU Institutions and the Member States should ensure more transparency, States should ensure transparency, accountability and democratic control in accountability and democratic control in the process of policy development and the process of policy development and implementation; notes with satisfaction the implementation; notes with satisfaction the intention of the Commission to present to intention of the Commission to present to the Parliament and the Council updated the Parliament and the Council updated information on the implementation of the information on the implementation of the Agenda; reiterates its intention to organise Agenda; reiterates its intention to organise regular monitoring exercises, in regular monitoring exercises, in cooperation with the national parliaments, cooperation with the national parliaments, on the proper implementation of the on the proper implementation of the Agenda; invites the Commission to involve Agenda; invites the Commission to involve the Parliament in the process of developing the Parliament in the process of developing performance indicators for key EU performance indicators for key EU instruments; notes with interest the instruments; notes with interest the Commission's proposal to set up a EU Commission's proposal to set up a EU Security Consultative Forum and looks Security Consultative Forum and looks forward to receiving more detailed forward to receiving more detailed information on it; information on it and the Parliaments involvement therein;

Or. en

Amendment 80 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1065532EN.doc 45/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN updated information on the implementation information on the implementation of the of the Agenda; reiterates its intention to Agenda, the progress made regarding the organise regular monitoring exercises, in objectives set, the problems faced; cooperation with the national parliaments, reiterates its intention to organise regular on the proper implementation of the monitoring exercises, in cooperation with Agenda; invites the Commission to involve the national parliaments, and in the Parliament in the process of developing consultation with NGOs, on the proper performance indicators for key EU implementation of the Agenda; invites the instruments; notes with interest the Commission to involve the Parliament in Commission's proposal to set up a EU the process of developing performance Security Consultative Forum and looks indicators for key EU instruments; notes forward to receiving more detailed with interest the Commission's proposal to information on it; set up a EU Security Consultative Forum and asks to receive more detailed information on it, in particular regarding its exact role, tasks and powers, its membership, and asks to be associated to its works;

Or. en

Amendment 81 Sophia in 't Veld

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

4 a. Stresses the need of improvement of democratic and judicial oversight of Member State intelligence services; notes that the Parliament, Court of Justice and Ombudsman lack sufficient powers to conduct an effective level of scrutiny of European security policies;

Or. en

Amendment 82 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

PE560.742v01–00 46/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Calls on the Commission and the deleted Council to establish a Roadmap - or a similar mechanism - as quickly as possible to ensure an effective and operational implementation of the Agenda and to start implementing it within the next six months; points out that the EU Policy cycle for serious and organised crime has proved its effectiveness; therefore considers that the possibility to extend this cycle to other priority areas deserves further examination; looks forward to further discuss these issues with the Commission and the Standing Committee on operational cooperation on internal security (COSI);

Or. en

Amendment 83 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1065532EN.doc 47/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Or. en

Amendment 84 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Calls on the Commission and the 5. Calls on the Commission and the Council to establish a Roadmap - or a Council to establish a Roadmap - or a similar mechanism - as quickly as possible similar mechanism - as quickly as possible to ensure an effective and operational to ensure a fundamental rights compliant, implementation of the Agenda and to start effective and operational implementation implementing it within the next six of the Agenda and to start implementing it months; points out that the EU Policy cycle within the next six months; points out that for serious and organised crime has proved the EU Policy cycle for serious and its effectiveness; therefore considers that organised crime has proved its usefulness; the possibility to extend this cycle to other therefore considers that the possibility to priority areas deserves further examination; extend this cycle to other priority areas looks forward to further discuss these deserves further examination; looks issues with the Commission and the forward to further discuss these issues with Standing Committee on operational the Commission and the Standing cooperation on internal security (COSI); Committee on operational cooperation on internal security (COSI);

Or. en

Amendment 85 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 48/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN for serious and organised crime has proved the European Parliament for evaluation its effectiveness; therefore considers that and control; points out that the EU Policy the possibility to extend this cycle to other cycle for serious and organised crime has priority areas deserves further examination; proved its effectiveness; therefore looks forward to further discuss these considers that the possibility to extend this issues with the Commission and the cycle to other priority areas deserves Standing Committee on operational further examination in full respect and cooperation on internal security (COSI); compliance with the rights of the European and national Parliaments ; looks forward to further discuss these issues with the Commission and the Standing Committee on operational cooperation on internal security (COSI);

Or. en

Amendment 86 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Welcomes the underlying principle of deleted the Agenda to fully apply and implement existing instruments in the area of security before proposing new ones; deplores, however, that despite the numerous calls by Parliament, an evaluation focused on the operational effectiveness of the existing EU instruments and on the remaining gaps is still lacking; believes that such an exercise is needed to ensure that the European security policy is evidence- based, needs-driven, coherent and comprehensive; calls on the Commission to include such operational evaluation of existing EU instruments and funding in the internal security area as a priority measure to be done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 49/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 87 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 88 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 50/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN exercise is needed to ensure that the however, that despite the numerous calls European security policy is evidence- by Parliament, an evaluation focused on based, needs-driven, coherent and the operational effectiveness of the existing comprehensive; calls on the Commission to EU instruments and on the remaining gaps include such operational evaluation of is still lacking; believes that such an existing EU instruments and funding in the exercise is strongly needed to ensure that internal security area as a priority measure the European security policy is evidence- to be done under the Roadmap for based, needs-driven, coherent and implementation of the Agenda; comprehensive; calls on the Commission to include such operational evaluation of existing EU instruments and funding in the internal security area as a priority measure to be done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda;

Or. en

Amendment 89 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Welcomes the underlying principle of 6. Welcomes the underlying principle of the Agenda to fully apply and implement the Agenda to fully apply and implement existing instruments in the area of security existing instruments in the area of security before proposing new ones; deplores, before proposing new ones; Deeply however, that despite the numerous calls deplores, however, that despite the by Parliament, an evaluation focused on numerous calls by Parliament, an the operational effectiveness of the evaluation focused on the implementation existing EU instruments and on the of the existing EU instruments and on the remaining gaps is still lacking; believes remaining gaps is still lacking; believes that such an exercise is needed to ensure that such an exercise is needed to ensure that the European security policy is that the European security policy is evidence-based, needs-driven, coherent and fundamental rights compliant, evidence- comprehensive; calls on the Commission to based, needs-driven, cost-effective, include such operational evaluation of coherent and comprehensive; reiterates its existing EU instruments and funding in calls on the Council and the Commission the internal security area as a priority to comprehensively evaluate the measure to be done under the Roadmap implementation of the measures adopted for implementation of the Agenda; in the area of internal security before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, making use of the procedure provided for in Article 70 TFEU ;

AM\1065532EN.doc 51/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Or. en

Amendment 90 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Welcomes the underlying principle of 6. Welcomes the underlying principle of the Agenda to fully apply and implement the Agenda to fully apply and implement existing instruments in the area of security existing instruments in the area of security before proposing new ones; deplores, before proposing new ones; deplores, however, that despite the numerous calls however, that despite the numerous calls by Parliament, an evaluation focused on by Parliament, an evaluation focused on the operational effectiveness of the existing the operational effectiveness of the existing EU instruments and on the remaining gaps EU instruments and on the remaining gaps is still lacking; believes that such an is still lacking; believes that such an exercise is needed to ensure that the exercise is needed to ensure that the European security policy is evidence- European security policy is evidence- based, needs-driven, coherent and based, needs-driven, coherent and comprehensive; calls on the Commission to comprehensive; calls on the Commission to include such operational evaluation of include such operational evaluation of existing EU instruments and funding in the existing EU instruments and funding in the internal security area as a priority measure internal security area as a priority measure to be done under the Roadmap for to be done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda; implementation of the Agenda and whether existing resources are sufficient

Or. en

Amendment 91 Sophia in 't Veld, Gérard Deprez

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 52/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN by Parliament, an evaluation focused on by Parliament, an evaluation focused on the operational effectiveness of the existing the operational effectiveness of the existing EU instruments and on the remaining gaps EU instruments and on the remaining gaps is still lacking; believes that such an is still lacking; believes that such an exercise is needed to ensure that the exercise is needed to ensure that the European security policy is evidence- European security policy is, necessary and based, needs-driven, coherent and proportionate, evidence-based, needs- comprehensive; calls on the Commission to driven, coherent and comprehensive; calls include such operational evaluation of on the Commission to include such existing EU instruments and funding in the operational evaluation of existing EU internal security area as a priority measure instruments and funding in the internal to be done under the Roadmap for security area as a priority measure to be implementation of the Agenda; done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda;

Or. en

Amendment 92 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Welcomes the underlying principle of 6. Welcomes the underlying principle of the Agenda to fully apply and implement the Agenda to fully apply and implement existing instruments in the area of security existing instruments in the area of security before proposing new ones; deplores, before proposing new ones; stresses the however, that despite the numerous calls need to evaluate existing instruments in by Parliament, an evaluation focused on the light of new security threat the EU is the operational effectiveness of the facing; believes that such an exercise is existing EU instruments and on the helpful to ensure that the European remaining gaps is still lacking; believes security policy is efficient, effective needs- that such an exercise is needed to ensure driven, coherent, reactive and that the European security policy is comprehensive; calls on the Commission to evidence-based, needs-driven, coherent provide such evaluation of existing EU and comprehensive; calls on the instruments in order to better protect EU Commission to include such operational citizens; evaluation of existing EU instruments and funding in the internal security area as a priority measure to be done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 53/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 93 Kati Piri

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Welcomes the underlying principle of 6. Welcomes the underlying principle of the Agenda to fully apply and implement the Agenda to fully apply and implement existing instruments in the area of security existing instruments in the area of security before proposing new ones; deplores, before proposing new ones; deplores, however, that despite the numerous calls however, that despite the numerous calls by Parliament, an evaluation focused on by Parliament, an evaluation focused on the operational effectiveness of the existing the operational effectiveness of the existing EU instruments and on the remaining gaps EU instruments and on the remaining gaps is still lacking; believes that such an is still lacking; believes that such an exercise is needed to ensure that the exercise is needed to ensure that the European security policy is evidence- European security policy, including the based, needs-driven, coherent and proposed EU PNR Directive, is evidence- comprehensive; calls on the Commission to based, needs-driven, coherent and include such operational evaluation of comprehensive, especially when existing EU instruments and funding in the fundamental rights of European citizens internal security area as a priority measure are under pressure; calls on the to be done under the Roadmap for Commission to include such operational implementation of the Agenda; evaluation of existing EU instruments and funding in the internal security area as a priority measure to be done under the Roadmap for implementation of the Agenda;

Or. en

Amendment 94 Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel, Sophia in 't Veld, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Robert Rochefort, Cecilia Wikström, Nathalie Griesbeck

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6 a. Calls the Commission to quickly table a legislative proposal amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the

PE560.742v01–00 54/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) to harmonize the alert criteria and make compulsory alerts of persons convicted or suspected of terrorism.

Or. en

Amendment 95 Axel Voss, Artis Pabriks

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6 a. Agrees with the Commission that PNR data has proven necessary to identify high risk travellers in the context of combatting terrorism, drugs trafficking, trafficking in human beings, child sexual exploitation and other serious and organised crimes;

Or. en

Amendment 96 Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel, Sophia in 't Veld, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Robert Rochefort, Cecilia Wikström, Nathalie Griesbeck

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6 b. Asks that in the future, any proposal creating new tools in the field of security, such as PNR, systematically includes mechanisms of information exchanges and cooperation between Member States.

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 55/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 97 Axel Voss, Artis Pabriks

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

6 b. Welcomes Commission's urgent call to finalise the work on the establishment of an EU Passenger Name Record system; in this regard recalls that European Parliament committed itself to work towards the finalisation of an EU PNR Directive by the end of the year;

Or. en

Amendment 98 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for deleted more joined-up inter-agency and cross- sectoral approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 56/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 99 Geoffrey Van Orden

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for 7. takes note of the measures proposed by more joined-up inter-agency and cross- the Commission for improving the sectoral approach; takes note of the information exchange and increasing measures proposed by the Commission for operational cooperation between the improving the information exchange and Member States, and with the EU agencies; increasing operational cooperation between notes that not enough concrete measures the Member States, and with the EU are provided for in the Agenda for agencies; notes with regret that not enough strengthening the justice dimension of concrete measures are provided for in the security framework; reiterates its call for Agenda for strengthening the justice further development of judicial cooperation dimension of security framework; in criminal matters; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 100 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral approach; takes note of the measures approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough agencies; notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; dimension of security policies; Insists on reiterates its call for further development the integration of and further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters; of an independent EU Justice Agenda strengthening the rights of suspected and accused persons, victims and witnesses

AM\1065532EN.doc 57/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 101 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. takes note of the Commission's call for joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral more joined-up inter-agency and cross- approach; takes note of the measures sectoral approach which has to fully proposed by the Commission for respect and comply with EU data improving the information exchange and protection provisions and with the increasing operational cooperation between necessity and proportionality principles; the Member States, and with the EU takes note of the measures proposed by the agencies; notes with regret that not enough Commission for improving the information concrete measures are provided for in the exchange and increasing operational Agenda for strengthening the justice cooperation between the Member States, dimension of security framework; and with the EU agencies; notes with regret reiterates its call for further development of that not enough concrete measures are judicial cooperation in criminal matters; provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, but stresses that this must be adressed in all its dimensions and not be limited to the aspect of research and investigation of serious offenders;

Or. en

Amendment 102 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

PE560.742v01–00 58/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for a joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral more joined-up inter-agency and cross- approach; takes note of the measures sectoral approach; takes note of the proposed by the Commission for measures proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States by working quickly to agencies; notes with regret that not enough implement a much-needed EU PNR concrete measures are provided for in the system which would provide a legal Agenda for strengthening the justice framework for the exchange of passenger dimension of security framework; information, whilst ensuring the highest reiterates its call for further development of standards of data protection, to help better judicial cooperation in criminal matters; track and intercept terrorist activity, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 103 Tomáš Zdechovský

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral approach; takes note of the measures approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough agencies; notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters; judicial cooperation in criminal matters

AM\1065532EN.doc 59/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN including fight against arms trafficking;

Or. en

Amendment 104 Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral approach; takes note of the measures approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation as well the Member States, and with the EU as good practices between the Member agencies; notes with regret that not enough States, and with the EU agencies; notes concrete measures are provided for in the with regret that not enough concrete Agenda for strengthening the justice measures are provided for in the Agenda dimension of security framework; for strengthening the justice dimension of reiterates its call for further development of security framework; reiterates its call for judicial cooperation in criminal matters; further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 105 Kati Piri

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 60/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN concrete measures are provided for in the concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters; judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 106 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral approach; takes note of the measures approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not agencies; calls upon the Commission to enough concrete measures are provided urgently take any appropriate measure to for in the Agenda for strengthening the swiftly conclude pending wokring justice dimension of security framework; arrangements between agencies; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

Amendment 107 Emil Radev

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1065532EN.doc 61/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough agencies; reiterates its call for greater use concrete measures are provided for in the of the existing instruments and databases Agenda for strengthening the justice such as SIS, SLTD, EPRIS, and dimension of security framework; cooperation teams such as JITs; notes reiterates its call for further development of with regret that not enough concrete judicial cooperation in criminal matters; measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, including by quickly implementing instruments such as the European Investigation Order;

Or. en

Amendment 108 Axel Voss, Artis Pabriks

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Supports the Commission's call for more 7. Supports the Commission's call for more joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral joined-up inter-agency and cross-sectoral approach; takes note of the measures approach; takes note of the measures proposed by the Commission for proposed by the Commission for improving the information exchange and improving the information exchange and increasing operational cooperation between increasing operational cooperation between the Member States, and with the EU the Member States, and with the EU agencies; notes with regret that not enough agencies; notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters; judicial cooperation in criminal matters; in this regard believes that a better and closer cooperation between all EU bodies and its Member States, army and defence bodies, NATO, intelligence, counter- intelligence and through the use of new technologies are necessary as well and should be covered by the European

PE560.742v01–00 62/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Agenda on Security;

Or. en

Amendment 109 Jeroen Lenaers

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 a. Fully supports the Commission's priority to help Member States to further develop mutual trust, fully exploit existing tools for information sharing and foster cross-border operational cooperation between competent authorities. Underlines the importance of such cross- border operational cooperation, in particular in border regions;

Or. en

Amendment 110 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 a. notes with regret that not enough concrete measures are provided for in the Agenda for strengthening the justice dimension of security framework; reiterates its call for further development of judicial cooperation in criminal matters;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 63/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 111 Artis Pabriks, Axel Voss, Jeroen Lenaers, Barbara Kudrycka

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 a. Welcomes the Council decision of 18 May 2015 inviting 'the High Representative, in close co-operation with Commission services and the European Defence Agency, and in close consultation with the EU Member States, to present by the end of 2015 a joint framework with actionable proposals to help countering hybrid threats and Foster the resilience of the EU and its Member States as well as partners'. Invites to develop closer synergies between internal and external EU security dimensions, and between European Agenda on Security and upcoming review of the European Security Strategy. Calls on closer cooperation between all relevant EU bodies and agencies, Member States, and other international organizations, in particular NATO, to develop greater situational awareness and early-warning mechanisms for countering the hybrid warfare threats in areas as cyber defence, strategic communications, border security, energy security, and other;

Or. en

Amendment 112 Jeroen Lenaers

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 b. Welcomes the Commission's announced assessment of the necessity and potential added value of a European

PE560.742v01–00 64/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Police Record Index System (EPRIS) to facilitate cross-border access to information held in national police records and fully supports the launch of a pilot project planned by a group of Member States to establish mechanisms for automated cross-border searches in national indexes on a 'hit'/'no hit' basis. Underlines the importance of cross- border access to information, in particular in border regions.

Or. en

Amendment 113 Jeroen Lenaers

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 c. Stresses the importance of Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) to investigate specific cases of a cross-border nature and calls on the Member States to use this successful tool more regularly. Invites the Commission to develop proposals for a legal framework that would allow the establishment of semi-permanent or permanent JITs to address persistent threats, in particular in border regions, such as drugs trafficking, prostitution and human trafficking, and motorcycle gangs.

Or. en

Amendment 114 Jeroen Lenaers

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new)

AM\1065532EN.doc 65/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

7 d. Regrets that instruments such as freezing and confiscation of criminal assets are not yet used systematically in all appropriate cross-border cases, and calls for increased efforts from the Member States and the Commission in this area.

Or. en

Amendment 115 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Expresses its satisfaction with the deleted Commission's commitment to ensure that the internal and external dimensions of the security work in tandem; asks the Commission to keep the Parliament duly informed of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal and external dimension of the security;

Or. en

Amendment 116 Michael Gahler, Arnaud Danjean

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 66/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN developing the link between the internal enhanced coherence between external and external dimension of the security; and internal instruments especially in response to horizontal issues such as counter-terrorism, terrorism, organised crime, foreign fighters, cyber defence, smuggling and trafficking in human beings, and migration; calls for further synergies between CSDP in both its civilian and military dimensions, and Freedom, Security and Justice actors (Europol, FRONTEX, CEPOL) asks the Commission to keep the Parliament duly informed of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal and external dimension of the security;

Or. en

Amendment 117 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Expresses its satisfaction with the 8. Expresses its satisfaction with the Commission's commitment to ensure that Commission's commitment to ensure that the internal and external dimensions of the the internal and external dimensions of the security work in tandem; asks the security work in tandem and calls on the Commission to keep the Parliament duly Commission and Member States to informed of its further actions aiming at regularly assess the impact of the agenda developing the link between the internal on the EU external security strategy and and external dimension of the security; vice versa, including the obligations of respect and promotion of fundamental freedoms and rights and democratic values and principles as contained in the international conventions and agreements they have ratified or signed; asks the Commission to keep the Parliament duly informed of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal and external dimension of the security;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 67/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 118 Judith Sargentini, Bodil Ceballos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Expresses its satisfaction with the 8. Welcomes the Commission's Commission's commitment to ensure that commitment to ensure that the internal and the internal and external dimensions of the external dimensions of the security work in security work in tandem; asks the tandem; reiterates its calls on the Commission to keep the Parliament duly Commission to ensure that the relevant informed of its further actions aiming at policies comply with the principles laid developing the link between the internal down in Articles 2,3,6 and 21 TEU, asks and external dimension of the security; the Commission to keep the Parliament duly informed of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal and external dimension of security in order for it to be able to exercise its right of democratic scrutiny together with national parliaments;

Or. en

Amendment 119 Emil Radev

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Expresses its satisfaction with the 8. Expresses its satisfaction with the Commission's commitment to ensure that Commission's commitment to ensure that the internal and external dimensions of the the internal and external dimensions of the security work in tandem; asks the security work in tandem; asks the Commission to keep the Parliament duly Commission to keep the Parliament duly informed of its further actions aiming at informed of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal developing the link between the internal and external dimension of the security; and external dimension of the security; reiterates its call for greater cooperation with third countries, especially in the fight against organised crime and terrorism;

PE560.742v01–00 68/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 120 Artis Pabriks, Axel Voss, Jeroen Lenaers, Barbara Kudrycka

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Expresses its satisfaction with the 8. Expresses its satisfaction with the Commission's commitment to ensure that Commission's commitment to ensure that the internal and external dimensions of the the internal and external dimensions of the security work in tandem; asks the security work in tandem; asks the Commission to keep the Parliament duly Commission to regularly report to the informed of its further actions aiming at Parliament of its further actions aiming at developing the link between the internal developing the link between the internal and external dimension of the security; and external dimension of the security, especially considering existence of hybrid threats Europe is facing in a current security environment;

Or. en

Amendment 121 Judith Sargentini, Bodil Ceballos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8 a. Calls for very strong human rights clauses in cooperation agreements with third countries, especially in Northern Africa and the Gulf region with regard to security cooperation; calls for cooperation with non-democratic countries with poor human rights records to be reconsidered;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 69/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 122 Judith Sargentini, Bodil Ceballos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8 b. Stresses the crucial importance to address the root causes of armed conflict, extremism and poverty in third countries, which cause security challenges for the EU; urges the HR, the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts in supporting inclusive, pluralistic and well-functioning states, with a strong and viable civil society capable of delivering freedom, security, justice, and employment to their citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 123 Judith Sargentini, Bodil Ceballos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8 c. Strongly rejects recent decision and plans to use Common Security and Defence Policies for migration control, inter alia, by using military force against traffickers; rejects EUNAFOR Med and also the decisions to modify the mandates of ongoing CSDP missions in the Sahel region by including the issue of migration; is deeply concerned about media reports regarding requests by the EU or EU Member States to establish bases for drones in countries such as Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia; is convinced that CSDP could contribute to searching and rescue thus fulfilling a purely humanitarian task in line with Article 43 of the Lisbon Treaty

PE560.742v01–00 70/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 124 Judith Sargentini, Bodil Ceballos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

8 d. Opposes the idea to use armed drones and surveillance drones especially in North Africa as an instrument in the fight against migration and organised crime actors involved in human trafficking; urges the HR to present a draft Common position on the use of armed drones in line with the European Parliament resolution adopted on 27 February 2014

Or. en

Amendment 125 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the deleted importance of supporting actions relating to training, research and innovation; considers that the training and exchange programmes for law enforcement officials are of significant importance for further fostering the European law enforcement culture; believes that more investment in research and innovation relating to security, including in the prevention field, is necessary; (There is no such thing as a European law enforcement culture and one should not attempt to create it. Coordinated action on national level guarantees the fastest, most

AM\1065532EN.doc 71/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN acurate and swift response to crime.)

Or. en

Amendment 126 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the 9. Agrees with the Commission on the importance of supporting actions relating importance of supporting actions relating to training, research and innovation; to training, research and innovation and considers that the training and exchange the important work of CEPOL in this programmes for law enforcement officials field; considers that the training and are of significant importance for further exchange programmes for law enforcement fostering the European law enforcement officials are of significant importance for culture; believes that more investment in further fostering the European law research and innovation relating to enforcement culture; believes that more security, including in the prevention field, investment in research and innovation is necessary; relating to security, including in the prevention field, is necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 127 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the 9. Agrees with the Commission on the importance of supporting actions relating importance of supporting actions relating to training, research and innovation; to training, research and innovation; considers that the training and exchange considers that the training and exchange programmes for law enforcement officials programmes for law enforcement officials are of significant importance for further are of significant importance for further fostering the European law enforcement fostering the European law enforcement culture; believes that more investment in implementation; believes that more research and innovation relating to investment in research and innovation

PE560.742v01–00 72/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN security, including in the prevention field, relating to security, including in the fields is necessary; of promotion and respect of fundamental rights and prevention, is necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 128 Eleftherios Synadinos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the 9. Agrees with the Commission on the importance of supporting actions relating importance of supporting actions relating to training, research and innovation; to training, research and innovation; considers that the training and exchange considers that the training and exchange programmes for law enforcement officials programmes for law enforcement officials are of significant importance for further are of significant importance for further fostering the European law enforcement fostering the European law enforcement culture; believes that more investment in culture, integration and cooperation; research and innovation relating to believes that more investment in research security, including in the prevention field, and innovation relating to security, is necessary; including in the prevention field, is necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 129 Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the 9. Agrees with the Commission on the importance of supporting actions relating pivotal importance of supporting actions to training, research and innovation; relating to training, research and considers that the training and exchange innovation which can allow us to learn programmes for law enforcement officials from our mistakes of the past; considers are of significant importance for further that the training and exchange programmes fostering the European law enforcement for law enforcement officials are of culture; believes that more investment in significant importance for further fostering

AM\1065532EN.doc 73/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN research and innovation relating to the European law enforcement culture and security, including in the prevention field, good practices in that field; believes that is necessary; more investment in research and innovation relating to security, including in the prevention field, is necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 130 Barbara Matera

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Agrees with the Commission on the 9. Agrees with the Commission on the importance of supporting actions relating importance of supporting actions relating to training, research and innovation; to training, research and innovation; considers that the training and exchange considers that the training and exchange programmes for law enforcement officials programmes for law enforcement officials are of significant importance for further are of significant importance for further fostering the European law enforcement fostering the European law enforcement culture; believes that more investment in culture; believes that more investment in research and innovation relating to research and innovation relating to security, including in the prevention field, security, including in the prevention is necessary; field,would help to set up a more aware approach to this sector;

Or. en

Amendment 131 Michael Gahler, Arnaud Danjean

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9 a. Highlights the importance and timeliness of the ongoing strategic review by the HR/VP to which she was entrusted by the European Council of December 2013 which should lead to the adoption of a new European Security Strategy; a

PE560.742v01–00 74/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN broad strategy including foreign and security policy issues should identify and describe EU interests, priorities and objectives, existing and evolving threats, challenges and opportunities, and the EU instruments and means to meet them;

Or. en

Amendment 132 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

9 a. Underlines that security is a Fundamental Right; believes that this Fundamental Right is under particular threat and calls upon the EU and its Member States to undertake all necessary steps to secure its citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 133 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Points out that the rapidly changing 10. Points out that the rapidly changing security situation calls for a flexible and security situation calls for a flexible and adaptive approach and a regular review of adaptive approach and a regular review of the priority actions set out in the Agenda, the priority actions set out in the Agenda, which could be performed by making use which could be performed by making use of the obligation set out in Article 222 of the obligation set out in Article 222 TFEU on the European Council to TFEU on the European Council to regularly conduct an assessment of threats regularly conduct an assessment of threats to the Union; to the Union and that such assessment is shared with the European Parliament and national parliaments;

AM\1065532EN.doc 75/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Or. en

Amendment 134 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Martina Anderson

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Points out that the rapidly changing 10. Points out that the rapidly changing security situation calls for a flexible and security situation calls for a flexible and adaptive approach and a regular review of adaptive approach and a regular review of the priority actions set out in the Agenda, the priority actions set out in the Agenda, which could be performed by making use which could be performed by making use of the obligation set out in Article 222 of the obligation set out in Article 222 TFEU on the European Council to TFEU on the European Council to regularly conduct an assessment of threats regularly conduct an assessment of the to the Union; reality of the threats to the Union and to inform the European Parliament, including proposals for review or for new measures;

Or. en

Amendment 135 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Points out that the rapidly changing 10. Points out that the rapidly changing security situation calls for a flexible and security situation, calls for a flexible, adaptive approach and a regular review of adaptive and technologically capable the priority actions set out in the Agenda, approach as well as a regular review of the which could be performed by making use priority actions set out in the Agenda, of the obligation set out in Article 222 which could be performed by making use TFEU on the European Council to of the obligation set out in Article 222 regularly conduct an assessment of threats TFEU on the European Council to to the Union; regularly conduct an assessment of threats to the Union; stresses the particular role of Europol in conducting these assessments

PE560.742v01–00 76/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN and to report back to the European Parliament;

Or. en

Amendment 136 Tomáš Zdechovský

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

10 a. Points out that more attention should be paid to new developments in cross-border organised crime such as arms trafficking, people smuggling and illegal drug trade; calls on Commission to adress these issues more adequately.

Or. en

Amendment 137 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat islamic terrorism prevent radicalisation and in particular the and to prevent muslim-radicalisation and new structure of European Counter- in particular the new structure of European Terrorism Centre created within Counter-Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Council to clarify further clarify its exact role, tasks and its exact role, tasks and powers; powers;

Or. en

Amendment 138 Judith Sargentini

AM\1065532EN.doc 77/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent radicalisation and in particular the prevent radicalisation and in particular the new structure of European Counter- new structure of European Counter- Terrorism Centre created within Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers; powers particularly in view of the need to ensure proper democratic and judicial oversigh at the appropriate levels, including through the ongoing revision of EUROPOL's mandate;

Or. en

Amendment 139 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

Amendment 140 Mariya Gabriel

PE560.742v01–00 78/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent radicalisation and in particular the prevent radicalisation and in particular the new structure of European Counter- new structure of European Counter- Terrorism Centre created within Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers; powers; recalls the crucial role of education and inter-cultural dialogue as a means to prevent radicalisation and the upsurge of intolerance and extremism; insists on the importance to closely collaborate with civil society, the private sector and technology industries and to direct our efforts towards the consolidation of expertise dedicated to prevent radicalisation, the evaluation of existing practices and cooperation with third countries.

Or. en

Amendment 141 Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 79/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 142 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent radicalisation and in particular the prevent radicalisation and in particular the new structure of European Counter- new structure of European Counter- Terrorism Centre created within Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and strengthen the Radicalisation Awareness powers; Network (RAN) to establish initiatives to address radicalisation at grassroots level and encourage community integration, tolerance, education and deradicalisation programmes and social action working in parallel with law enforcement and judicial action, and to further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers;

Or. en

Amendment 143 Emil Radev

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent radicalisation and in particular the prevent radicalisation and in particular the new structure of European Counter- new structure of European Counter- Terrorism Centre created within Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers; powers; reiterates the importance of tracking terrorist financing and, to this end, welcomes the adoption of the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Package;

PE560.742v01–00 80/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 144 Kati Piri

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent radicalisation and in particular the prevent radicalisation and in particular the new structure of European Counter- new structure of European Counter- Terrorism Centre created within Terrorism Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers; powers; emphasises that sharing security and intelligence information between the Member States is crucial and that it should be done on a more structural basis; stresses the need for actively sharing best practices in the field of anti- radicalisation policies by the competent authorities of the Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 145 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Welcomes the measures set out in the the Agenda to combat terrorism and to Agenda to combat terrorism and to prevent prevent radicalisation and in particular the radicalisation and in particular the new new structure of European Counter- structure of European Counter-Terrorism Terrorism Centre created within Centre created within EUROPOL; EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to welcomes in this regard also the creation further clarify its exact role, tasks and of a Internet Referral Unit (IRU) at powers; Europol to support Member States to identify and to remove violent extremist

AM\1065532EN.doc 81/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN content online in cooperation with industry partners; recalls that the Parliament has on noumerous occasions expressed the necessity of increased information sharing; calls on the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers; suggests to further involve Europol in the exchange of relevant information between Member States and competent authorities;

Or. en

Amendment 146 Barbara Matera, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Takes notes of the measures set out in 11. Takes notes of the measures set out in the Agenda to combat terrorism and to the Agenda to combat terrorism,to track prevent radicalisation and in particular the terrorist financing, to address the threat new structure of European Counter- of foreign fighters and to prevent Terrorism Centre created within radicalisation and in particular the new EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to structure of European Counter-Terrorism further clarify its exact role, tasks and Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on powers; the Commission to further clarify its exact role, tasks and powers;

Or. en

Amendment 147 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 82/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Terrorism Centre created within Centre created within EUROPOL; calls on EUROPOL; calls on the Commission to the Commission to further clarify its exact further clarify its exact role, tasks and role, tasks and powers; agrees that powers; prevention of radicalisation must be one of the EU priority given the current threat linked to radicalised European citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 148 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Calls on the Commission to develop together with the Member States a genuine strategy as regards European fighters, which is lacking in the Agenda on Security, in particular towards those returning from conflict zones, who want to leave the terrorist organisations which recruited them and show willingness to reintegrate in society; considers that a special emphasis should be put on the situation of young European fighters;

Or. en

Amendment 149 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Agrees that human trafficking is a phenomenon that needs to be addressed more effectively on the European level; strongly rejects, however, any link between irregular migration and terrorism; points out that the lack of legal

AM\1065532EN.doc 83/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN avenues into the EU in order to seek protection generates a constant demand for irregular avenues, thus endangering vulnerable migrants in need for international protection;

Or. en

Amendment 150 Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Believes that, apart from EU instruments combating organised crime and terrorism, a European agenda on security should include protection mechanisms for victims of these severe crimes in order to prevent further victimisation; notes that protecting victims should be regarded as an important tool to combat organised crime and terrorism as it gives a clear messages to the offender that society won't succumb to violence and that it will safeguard at all times the victims and their diginity;

Or. en

Amendment 151 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Underlines the essential importance of research and innovation in order to keep the EU up-to-date with the changing needs of security; highlights the importance of a competitive EU security

PE560.742v01–00 84/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN industry to contribute the EU's autonomy in security; recalls the Parliament's call for improved autonomy in EU IT-security and the need to consider EU-made security devices and services for critical infrastructure and public services;

Or. en

Amendment 152 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Supports the Commission in its will to develop a strong counter-narrative in order to prevent radicalisation of European citizens

Or. en

Amendment 153 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 b. Deplores the lack of concrete measures in the Agenda to strengthen the role of Internet as an awareness tool against radicalisation, in particular to disseminate counter-narratives online in a proactive manner so as to counter terrorist propaganda; underlines that the Commission should assist Member States to swiftly implement efficient policy measures in that regard; calls for a specific European body to be set up so as to mutualise Member States' capacities as well as analyse and share their

AM\1065532EN.doc 85/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN experiences in this domain, and also cooperate with Internet companies on issues such as referencing;

Or. en

Amendment 154 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 b. Reaffirms its committment to work towards the adoption of the EU-PNR Directive in respect of the legal requirements of the Charter of Fundamental rights while providing an efficient new tool at EU level for the fight against serious crime and terrorism; calls on the Commission, the Member States and relevant EU bodies to actively contribute to a successful adoption of this file;

Or. en

Amendment 155 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 b. Regrets the lack of more concrete measures in the European Agenda on Security in order to face terrosism and radicalisation in Europe; calls in particular the European Union to undertake measures in order to tackle radicalisation on Internet and the use of Internet websites or social media to spread radical ideologies in Europe;

PE560.742v01–00 86/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 156 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 c. Calls on the Commission to clarify the mandate, tasks and attributions of the new Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) Centre of excellence, and to involve in its operational structure political and administrative decision makers, both on national and local levels, so as to put the recommendations developed by experts and stakeholders into practice within the Member States; considers that the families of victims and of radicalised people should be fully associated in this process;

Or. en

Amendment 157 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 c. Stresses the gravity of organised crime in the field of trafficking in human beings; recalls the extreme degrees of violence and brutality criminals exert on this particularly vulnerable group; welcomes the existing framework and agrees to the need for a post-2016 strategy that involves Europol and Eurojust with there specific knowledge in this field;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 87/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 158 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 c. Stresses that the European Union has a responsability in identifying terrorist networks, and should therefore take concrete measures to tackle terrorism financing;

Or. en

Amendment 159 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 d. Expresses its concerns with regard to the recent rise of incidents and hate crimes, including online, against European citizens; calls on Member States to protect their citizens from future attacks and to prevent incitement to hatred and any act of intolerance based on origin, belief or religion, including through an educational work towards young people and the promotion of inclusive dialogue;

Or. en

Amendment 160 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new)

PE560.742v01–00 88/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 d. Recalls the crucial importance of disrupting financial flows in combatting terrorist and organised crime groups; welcomes the efforts undertaken to establish a fair and balanced participation in the US-led Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP); is convinced of the EU's capacities to establish an own Terrorist Finance Tracking System (TFTS) that complies with Fundamental Rights and strenghtens the EU's intelligence capacity;

Or. en

Amendment 161 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 d. Acknowledges that the fight against organised crime requires a strong European action; supports the Commission's determination to tackle this issue; calls the Commission in particular to establish a strong cooperation to tackle human trafficking , but also a cooperation with third countries against the smuggling of migrants in order to avoid new tragedies in the Mediterranean;

Or. en

Amendment 162 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 e (new)

AM\1065532EN.doc 89/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 e. Believes that extensive research and concrete measures should be developed, with the financial and operational support of the Commission, so as to promote and share with all European citizens, through effective channels of communication, our common values of tolerance, pluralism, respect for freedom of speech and conscience, and in overall our fundamental rights; considers that the Agenda should also underline the necessity to fight against misconceptions towards religions, in particular Islam, which as such don't play a role in radicalisation and terrorism;

Or. en

Amendment 163 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 e (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 e. Calls on the Commission to urgently set up a comprehensive strategy on the prevention of radicalisation online;

Or. en

Amendment 164 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 f (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 f. Whereas the issue of "foreign fighters" is not a new phenomenon, but

PE560.742v01–00 90/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN the scale of it has dramatically increased, with over 15.000 men and women from more than 80 countries around the word, among whom 3500 to 5000 estimated EU nationals have left their homes to become foreign fighters with the outbreak of the war and violence in Syria, Iraq, and Libya, posing an immense challenge to EU citizens security;

Or. en

Amendment 165 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 g (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 g. Stresses that addressing the threat posed by foreign fighters and terrorism in general requires a multi-layer approach, comprehensively addressing underlying factors such as radicalisation, developing social cohesion and inclusiveness and facilitating reintegration by promoting political and religious tolerance, analysing and counterbalancing online incitement to perform terrorist acts, preventing departures to join terrorist organisations, preventing and stemming recruitment and engagement in armed conflicts, disrupting financial support to terrorist organisations and individuals aiming to join them, ensuring firm legal prosecution where appropriate and providing law enforcement authorities will the appropriate tools to perform their duties in full respect of fundamental rights.

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 91/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 166 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 h (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 h. Stresses the urgent need to intensify the prevention of radicalization and foster the programs of de-radicalisation by empowering and engaging with communities and civil societies at national and local level to stop the spread of extremist ideologies. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN), which brings together all the actors involved in developing anti- radicalisation campaigns and setting up de-radicalisation structure and processes for the returning foreign fighters and to directly challenge the extremist ideologies by providing positive alternatives.

Or. en

Amendment 167 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 i (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

11 i. Regrets that the EU commission has not yet proposed a harmonised definition of "foreign fighters" and incites the Member states to qualifying as serious criminal offense, in their domestic law, the fact to travel to a conflict area to join a terrorist organisation, on the basis of the definition proposed by the United Nations Security Council resolution, in order to provide the ability for the judicial authorities to prosecute and penalise this offense where appropriate.

PE560.742v01–00 92/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 168 Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires a new approach to law enforcement in the a new approach to law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the Commission to digital age, as well as for judicial perform a thorough analysis of law cooperation; calls on the Commission to enforcement powers and capabilities online perform a thorough analysis of law and offline, while underlining that all enforcement and judicial authorities enforcement measures should strictly powers and capabilities online and offline, respect the fundamental rights; while underlining that all enforcement measures must strictly respect the fundamental rights;

Or. en

Amendment 169 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Takes note of the fact that the a new approach to law enforcement in the Commission considers that cybercrime digital age; calls on the Commission to requires a new approach to law perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the enforcement powers and capabilities online Commission to perform a thorough and offline, while underlining that all analysis of law enforcement powers and enforcement measures should strictly capabilities online and offline, while respect the fundamental rights; underlining that all enforcement measures have to strictly respect fundamental rights; stresses that all measures limiting fundamental rights on the internet need to be necessary and proportionate, in line with the Union and Member State law; reminds that illegal content online should

AM\1065532EN.doc 93/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN be removed immediately on the basis of due legal process; highlights the role of the ICT and IPSs in ensuring a fast and efficient removal of illegal content online at the request of the responsible law enforcement authority;

Or. en

Amendment 170 Judith Sargentini

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires a new approach to law enforcement in the a new approach to law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the Commission to digital age; calls on the Commission to perform a thorough analysis of law perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement powers and capabilities online enforcement powers and capabilities online and offline, while underlining that all and offline, while underlining that all enforcement measures should strictly enforcement measures should strictly respect the fundamental rights; respect the fundamental rights; In particular calls on the Commission to make sure that the right to use encryption remains intact throughout the European Union and that no measures shall be implemented by Member States to take away or limit that right;

Or. en

Amendment 171 Timothy Kirkhope

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

PE560.742v01–00 94/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN perform a thorough analysis of law terrorism is one of the greatest threats to enforcement powers and capabilities online our society today, enabling terrorist and offline, while underlining that all groups to establish and maintain links enforcement measures should strictly without the physical obstacle of borders; respect the fundamental rights; acknowledges that the internet and social networks are increasingly being used by terrorist organisations to recruit, finance and train internet users to incite them to commit acts of terrorism; calls on the Commission to perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement powers and capabilities online and offline, while underlining that all enforcement measures should strictly respect the fundamental rights;

Or. en

Amendment 172 Axel Voss

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Underlines that cyberspace is a new approach to law enforcement in the increasingly becoming a facilitator for digital age; calls on the Commission to organised crime in all its forms and perform a thorough analysis of law constitutes a severe threat to EU citizens enforcement powers and capabilities online but also to EU economy; underlines that and offline, while underlining that all industrial espionage is seriously enforcement measures should strictly threatening European competitiveness respect the fundamental rights; therefore we need a better economic oriented approach and a better defence of cyber threats; however acknowledges that cybercrime requires a new approach to law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the Commission to perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement powers and capabilities online and offline, while underlining that all enforcement measures should strictly respect the fundamental rights;

Or. en

AM\1065532EN.doc 95/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Amendment 173 Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Robert Rochefort, Cecilia Wikström, Nathalie Griesbeck

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires a new approach to law enforcement in the a new approach to law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the Commission to digital age; calls on the Commission to perform a thorough analysis of law perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement powers and capabilities online enforcement powers and capabilities online and offline, while underlining that all and offline, while underlining that all enforcement measures should strictly enforcement measures should strictly respect the fundamental rights; respect the fundamental rights; Asks the Commission to give the Europol "Internet Referral Unit" the additional resources necessary for its functioning rather than proceeding by internal redeployments of posts, including staff of the European Centre against cybercrime (EC3), which must not be unforced.

Or. en

Amendment 174 Monika Hohlmeier, Barbara Matera

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Stresses that cybercrime and cyber- a new approach to law enforcement in the facilitated crime constitute a major threat digital age; calls on the Commission to to EU citizens and therefore requires a perform a thorough analysis of law new approach to law enforcement in the enforcement powers and capabilities digital age; underlines that security for online and offline, while underlining that citizens has to be ensured to the same all enforcement measures should strictly extend online as offline; recalls that new respect the fundamental rights; technologic developments increase the impacts of crime in scale and speed and therefore urges the Commission to proide

PE560.742v01–00 96/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN law enforcement with legal and technical capabilities to tackle these crimes effectively in full respect the fundamental rights;

Or. en

Amendment 175 Rachida Dati, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires 12. Acknowledges that cybercrime requires a new approach to law enforcement in the a new approach to law enforcement in the digital age; calls on the Commission to digital age; calls on the Commission to perform a thorough analysis of law perform a thorough analysis of law enforcement powers and capabilities online enforcement powers and capabilities online and offline, while underlining that all and offline, while underlining that all enforcement measures should strictly enforcement measures should strictly respect the fundamental rights; respect the fundamental rights; is in favour of strengthening the budget and staff of the European Cybercrime Centre and establishing strong instruments to fight cybercrime;

Or. en

Amendment 176 Birgit Sippel

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12 a. Points out that a successful security policy has to address the underlying factors of extremism such as radicalisation, intolerance and discrimination by promoting political and religious tolerance, developing social cohesion and inclusiveness and

AM\1065532EN.doc 97/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN facilitating reintegration;

Or. en

Amendment 177 Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel, Sophia in 't Veld, Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz, Robert Rochefort, Cecilia Wikström, Nathalie Griesbeck

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12 a. Regrets that the Commission's draft budget 2016 for Europol (+/- 1.5 million EUR) does not give it the necessary resources to set up, as planned in the agenda, a European centre of counter- terrorism and an internet referral unit.

Or. en

Amendment 178 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12 a. Welcomes the work done by the European Cybercrime Centre EC3 in fighting serious transnational cybercrime and cyber-facilitated crime; underlines the key role of the EC3 in supporting Member States in particular in the fight against Child Sexual Exploitation; reitirates the announcements by the Commission to equip the EC3 with the neccessary experts and budget in order to boost European cooperation which have not been addressed since it's creation in 2013;

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 98/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Amendment 179 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new)

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

12 b. Calls on the EU Commission to launch a commensurate awareness and preparedness campaign on the risks linked to serious cybercrime in order to improve resilience against cyber-attacks.

Or. en

Amendment 180 Vicky Maeijer

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Deplores the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in the European Parliament Commission will align the available that the Commission will align the financial resources to the priorities of the available financial resources to the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once priorities of the Agenda; again the importance to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are sufficiently equipped to fulfil their tasks under the Agenda; intends to closely scrutinise how the Internal Security Fund is implemented at Union and at national level.

Or. en

Amendment 181 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Dennis de Jong, Cornelia Ernst, Barbara Spinelli, Marina Albiol Guzmán

AM\1065532EN.doc 99/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Welcomes the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in Parliament that the Commission will align the available Commission will align the available financial resources to the priorities of the financial resources to the priorities of the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once Agenda and asks that any funds and again the importance to ensure that the financing measures are taken in relevant EU agencies are sufficiently accordance with the budgetary powers equipped to fulfil their tasks under the and the European Parliament and on the Agenda; intends to closely scrutinise how basis of a legislative proposal; in this the Internal Security Fund is implemented regards is concerned by the orientations at Union and at national level. of legislative proposals as the EU-PNR and Smart Borders; intends to closely scrutinise how the Internal Security Fund is implemented at Union and at national level.

Or. en

Amendment 182 Emil Radev

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Welcomes the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in Parliament that the Commission will align the available Commission will align the available financial resources to the priorities of the financial resources to the priorities of the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again the importance to ensure that the relevant the importance to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are sufficiently equipped to EU agencies and Member States are fulfil their tasks under the Agenda; intends sufficiently equipped to fulfil their tasks to closely scrutinise how the Internal under the Agenda; intends to closely Security Fund is implemented at Union and scrutinise how the Internal Security Fund is at national level. implemented at Union and at national level.

PE560.742v01–00 100/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN Or. en

Amendment 183 Eleftherios Synadinos

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Welcomes the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in Parliament that the Commission will align the available Commission will align the available financial resources to the priorities of the financial resources to the priorities of the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again the importance to ensure that the relevant the importance to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are sufficiently equipped to EU agencies are sufficiently equipped and fulfil their tasks under the Agenda; intends adequately funded to fulfil their tasks in a to closely scrutinise how the Internal most fissible way, under the Agenda; Security Fund is implemented at Union and intends to closely scrutinise how the at national level. Internal Security Fund is implemented at Union and at national level.

Or. en

Amendment 184 Barbara Matera, Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Welcomes the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in Parliament that the Commission will align the available Commission will align the available financial resources to the priorities of the financial resources to the priorities of the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again the importance to ensure that the relevant the importance to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are sufficiently equipped to EU agencies are sufficiently equipped,both fulfil their tasks under the Agenda; intends in terms of financial allocations and to closely scrutinise how the Internal human resources, in order to fulfil their Security Fund is implemented at Union and tasks under the Agenda; intends to closely

AM\1065532EN.doc 101/102 PE560.742v01–00 EN at national level. scrutinise how the Internal Security Fund is implemented at Union and at national level.

Or. en

Amendment 185 Monika Hohlmeier

Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Draft motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Welcomes the statement made by First 13. Welcomes the statement made by First Vice-President of the Commission Frans Vice-President of the Commission Frans Timmermans in Parliament that the Timmermans in Parliament that the Commission will align the available Commission will align the available financial resources to the priorities of the financial resources to the priorities of the Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again Agenda; in this regard, stresses once again the importance to ensure that the relevant the importance to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are sufficiently equipped to EU agencies are equipped with sufficient fulfil their tasks under the Agenda; intends human and financial resources to fulfil to closely scrutinise how the Internal their existing and additional tasks under Security Fund is implemented at Union the Agenda; intends to closely scrutinise and at national level. and assess the future need of the Internal Security Fund at Union and at national level.

Or. en

PE560.742v01–00 102/102 AM\1065532EN.doc EN