Right–Wing Populist Parties in the Eu – the Case Study of Hungary from 2009 to 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Right–Wing Populist Parties in the Eu – the Case Study of Hungary from 2009 to 2019 UNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE SARAJEVO RIGHT–WING POPULIST PARTIES IN THE EU – THE CASE STUDY OF HUNGARY FROM 2009 TO 2019 MASTER THESIS Mentor: Prof. dr. Kapidzic Damir Student: Leila Lizde Index:1013/ II – PIR Department: Politology Stream: International relations and diplomacy Sarajevo, September 2020 2 3 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 2 THEORETICAL–METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ................................................... 7 2.1 Research problem ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Research subject .......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Research objectives ................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Scientific research objectives ............................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Social research objectives .................................................................................. 10 2.4 System hypothesis ..................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 General Research Hypothesis ............................................................................. 11 2.4.2 Specific hypotheses of research ......................................................................... 11 2.5 Method of research .................................................................................................... 11 3 POLITICAL POPULISM IN EUROPE ........................................................................... 12 3.1 Populism a historical overview and definitions ......................................................... 12 3.1.1 Cas Mudde – the ideational approach to populism ........................................... 14 3.1.2 Kurt Weyland – a political–strategic approach .................................................. 15 3.1.3 Pierre Ostiguy – a socio–cultural approach ....................................................... 16 3.2 Populism in west, east, south and north Europe – present situation .......................... 19 4 RISE OF THE DEMOCRACY IN HUNGARY AND OVERVIEW OF ITS MOST PROMINENT POLITICAL PARTIES .................................................................................. 25 4.1 Key elements in Hungary’s past that shaped its democracy in 1990s ....................... 25 4.1.1 Treaty of Trianon .............................................................................................. 27 4.1.2 Hungary and Germany in the Second World War ............................................. 28 4.1.3 Hungary and SSSR ............................................................................................. 30 4.2 Hungary`s transition to democracy ............................................................................ 32 4.2.1 Political happenings in the last decade of 20th century ..................................... 35 4.2.2 Political happenings in the first decade of the 21th century............................... 44 5 CASE STUDY – HUNGARY UNDER FIDESZ, FROM 2010 TO 2019 .................... 48 6 EU AND HUNGARY RELATIONSHIP FROM 2009 TO THE 2019 ...................... 72 6.1 The second Orbán`s government 2010 – 2014 and EU ............................................ 72 6.2 The third Orbán`s government 2014 – 2018 and EU .............................................. 75 6.3 The forth Orban`s government 2018 – 2022 and EU ................................................ 77 7 FINAL REMARKS .......................................................................................................... 82 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 87 4 5 1 INTRODUCTION In the last 20 years we can see a steady growth in the support for the European populist parties, particularly far right populist parties. The recent analysis that has been done in 2018 by the Guardian has revealed that the populist parties have more than tripled their support in Europe, and from 1998 the number of Europeans ruled by a government with at least one populist in the cabinet has increased from 12.5 million to 170 million and in the most recent national elections, one in four votes cast was for the populist party. The aim of the master thesis is to explore the rise of right wing populism in EU with focus on a Hungary, the first country to have more than two–thirds of MEPs backing censure motion in 2018 when the European Parliament voted to pursue unprecedented disciplinary action against Hungary over alleged breaches of the EU's core values (respect for human dignity and human rights, freedom, democracy, equality and the rule of law) accusing the Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's government on the attacks on the media, minorities, and the rule of law. In the beginning of the paper the rise of populism, nation centric public opinion and strengthening of right wing parties in the former communist countries now members of EU will be briefly presented. Since the focus of the thesis is Hungary, the communist past, rise of democracy from 1989 – elections held in 1990s and 2000s, parties that emerged, EU aspirations and influence of media, FDIs and NGOs in early 2000s will be as well discussed. How a country that was once the star of the post–1989 transition in economic (They had the largest inward flow of foreign direct investment in post–communist Europe and one of the least chaotic economic transitions) but mostly an example of how democracy should be done (They were the first who rewrote constitution in order to embrace democratic values, had a free and fair elections from 1990s till 2010 with government alternation from right to left and most NGOs East–Central European headquarters in Budapest) could become the latest critique of the system. The central part of the thesis will be focusing on the last ten years of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's government, concluding with the December of 2019, in which the increasingly prominent authoritarian, anti–European and anti–liberal attitude of Hungarian government and its effect on its relationship with the EU institutions and the transformation of Hungarian society by strengthening of nationalistic movements, use of the communist legacy, nation– building, populism, anti–immigrant mindset, changing of immigration and FDI laws will be examined. In the last ten years these happenings in Hungary were mostly explained, compared to the other CEE countries, discussed and criticized in the research articles by non–Hungarian publishers like the Journal of Contemporary European Studies, European Journal of Political Research, Party Politics, Comparative Political Studies Amnesty International Netherlands, 6 East European Politics and Societies, Heinrich Böll Stiftung and the Friedrich–Ebert–Stiftung who talked about Hungary`s decline of democracy, (non)participative political culture, authoritarian government, social protection party elite loyalty, party systems, regime–building politics, euro skepticism. The final part will be dealing with the publications that are concerning Hungarian political situation, how not being able to have freedom of expression led to citizen's behavior seen in the last two years in anti–government demonstrations, about the anti–Orbán opposition parties, the emergence of new movements and can the fall of the right wing populist parties and Orbán’s regime can be expected and who are going to be the new players ( will there be any ) in the arena and what can we expect from Hungary in the future, its influence in Central Europe and EU. At the end of the thesis, hopefully, one question will probably be answered: are right wing populist parties’ threat to the countries stability and EU existence or not? 2 THEORETICAL–METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 2.1 Research problem The twenty first century is a century in which information is two clicks away for the 60% of mobile phone users (HostingFacts, 2018). The one who controls it influences public opinion. Information as a tool is used by brands, companies, touristic agencies, actors, singers, but mostly by political parties. Since 1990s there is a global increase of countries that have democratically elected leaders. As a consequence of democratization and thanks to the globalization, political parties are now competing with each other in order to obtain and maintain the attention of voting force by influencing their source of information and using all available corresponding resources to get more attention locally but also worldwide. In Europe, nowadays, there is a distant and increasingly alien political class who lost touch with their traditional supporters, the mass of ordinary voters and is constantly losing its influence. This gap between the worldview of Europe's elites and the values of Europe's voters is used by the populist parties who use themes like immigration, opposition to Brussels governance, government measures connected to public expenditures to prove that existing political establishment is no longer representing the people. Many populist parties are not that easily classified using the political terminology of the 20th century. By the research done in 2015 by The Economist Intelligence Unit for the BBC’s Democracy day it represents a broader moral, social and cultural challenge to the old established parties,
Recommended publications
  • Local Benefits of Europe
    Local Benefits of Europe 1 European Green Party Rue Wiertz 31, 1050 Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Funded by the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author. Printed in Brussels, Belgium on recycled paper Designed by Mijuro © 2018 DEAR FRIENDS European politics have a signifi cant Evelyne Huytebroeck influence on the lives of people at the (Member of the EGP Committee) local level. In many EU Member States, the local elections are held simulta- neously with the European elections providing a huge opportunity to link the two election campaigns. Against this background, we would like to provide you with some practical background material and answer your questions on how European decisions in various policy areas influence your municipality by means of this booklet ‘Local Benefi ts of Europe’. This booklet is based on a work that was done by the German Greens lead by Anna Cavazzini and Reinhard Bütikofer. The information can also help you prepare for your local election programmes or campaigns. We place particular emphasis on how the people in your community benefi t practically from Europe, ranging from (Secretary General EGP) environmental protection to structural Mar Garcia policy, and what the Greens in Europe have achieved for European communi- ties. If you need more information on a spe- cifi c topic - no problem: in each chapter, you will fi nd a contact person who has contributed to this handbook and can answer your questions. We hope that this handbook will help you to prepare for the upcoming Euro- pean and local elections. Best regards 1. How do cities and municipalities benefi t from Europe? 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue Hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 Am
    Panel Discussion and Debate ‘the Future of Europe: the Rule of Law’ Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 am. 10.00 Welcome 10.05 Dean of the Faculty of Law, Prof Dr Miha Juhart Netherlands’ Ambassador Pieter J. Langenberg President of the National Assembly, Prof Dr Milan Brglez 10.15 Introduction by Dr Vasilka Sancin, Faculty of Law 10.25 Start of panel discussion 11.10 Public debate and questions 11.30 End of Program The event is organized by the Embassy of the Netherlands, in cooperation with the European Parliament Information Office in Slovenia and the Faculty of Law of the University of Ljubljana. Dr Milan Brglez: politician, political scientists, professor, lawyer President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia from the 1st of August 2014 and Deputy of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia in the Party of Miro Cerar Deputy Group, 2011-2014 Vice President, Slovenian Red Cross, Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences from 2006-2014, covered topics: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, Theory of International Relations, Selected Topics of International Law, Selected Topics of Diplomatic Law, European Protection of Human Rights and Teaching Assistant at the same Faculty of Social Sciences 1996-2006, covered subjects: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, International Law Policy, International Relations Dr Vasilka Sancin: professor, lawyer Vasilka Sancin, a Doctor of Legal Sciences, is an Assistant Professor of International Law and Director of the Institute for International Law and International Relations at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia where she teaches courses in the area of public international law at undergraduate and postgraduate levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Xm Xm Report
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0250/2018 4.7.2018 REPORT on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (2017/2131(INL)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Judith Sargentini (Initiative – Rule 45 and 52 of the Rules of Procedure) RR\1158298XM.docx PE620.837v02-00 XM United in diversity XM PR_INL CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION .............. 7 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 33 ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT ........................................................................................................... 36 MINORITY OPINION ............................................................................................................ 38 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL ..................................... 39 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION .............................. 46 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS .............................. 53 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY 59 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 69 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL
    [Show full text]
  • Internalizing European Politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 11, No. 1 (HR) October 2018 Croatia Political briefing: Internalizing European politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu Internalizing European politics in Croatia On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted on a resolution on a proposal to the European Council to consider possible measures against Hungary which is believed to be undermining the rule of law and fundamental rights. The resolution is based on a report submitted by Judith Sargentini, MEP (Member of the European Parliament) from the Greens. Croatian MEPs voted differently – some supported the resolution, some voted against it. This brief explains what were reasons for difference in voting. By doing so it also indicates how European politics is, step by step, internalized in Croatia which has marked its fifth year membership in the European Union. A motion against Hungary On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted for the first time in its history on a resolution against its member state. The resolution is “calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded.”1 The resolution is an expression of concern that Hungary is underperforming in the following areas: the functioning of the constitutional and
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and Legislatures Series Samuel C. Patterson
    PARLIAMENTS AND LEGISLATURES SERIES SAMUEL C. PATTERSON GENERAL ADVISORY EDITOR Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government EDITED BY SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID M. FARRELL, AND RICHARD S. KATZ OHI O STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 1999 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Party discipline and parliamentary government / edited by Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. p. cm. — (Parliaments and legislatures series) Based on papers presented at a workshop which was part of the European Consortium for Political Research's joint sessions in France in 1995. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0796-0 (cl: alk. paper). — ISBN 0-8142-5000-9 (pa : alk. paper) 1. Party discipline—Europe, Western. 2. Political parties—Europe, Western. 3. Legislative bodies—Europe, Western. I. Bowler, Shaun, 1958- . II. Farrell, David M., 1960- . III. Katz, Richard S. IV. European Consortium for Political Research. V. Series. JN94.A979P376 1998 328.3/75/ 094—dc21 98-11722 CIP Text design by Nighthawk Design. Type set in Times New Roman by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed by Bookcrafters, Inc.. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Part I: Theories and Definitions 1 Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments 3 Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz 2 How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments 23 Michael Laver and Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Van Reisen, M.E.H.; Kwinjeh, G.; Luecke, L
    Tilburg University Zimbabwe van Reisen, M.E.H.; Kwinjeh, G.; Luecke, L. Publication date: 2010 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): van Reisen, M. E. H., Kwinjeh, G., & Luecke, L. (2010). Zimbabwe: Women's voices. (Report of the European Parliamentary Hearing). EEPA. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. sep. 2021 Zimbabwe: Women’s Voices Report of the European Parliamentary Hearing, Brussels, 6 October 2010 IMPRESSUM Author: Europe External Policy Advisors (EEPA) Editors: Prof. Dr. Mirjam van Reisen, editor in chief Grace Kwinjeh Liana Luecke Editors: Susan Sellars-Shrestha Alexander Harvey Layout and Design: Filip De Keukeleere (EEPA) About EEPA EEPA (Europe External Policy Advisors) is a Brussels-based group of experts specialising in EU development policy. EEPA’s work is motivated by the goal of promoting a socially responsible European Union, based on the values of solidarity and equality and with a strong focus on global poverty eradication.
    [Show full text]
  • Health for Sale'
    INVITATION EVENT 'HEALTH FOR SALE' Dutch Leadership on Access to Affordable Medicines and Innovation February 5th 2016 | 7AM, Buitenhof 47, The Hague | 1:30pm - 5:30pm Please join our event Health for Sale, organised by Universities Allied for Essential Medicines (UAEM), Aids Fonds, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) and Health Action International (HAI). During this event we will discuss challenges regarding affordable access to medicines -globally as well as in Europe- and the lack of needs-driven innovation by the current pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) model. Subsequently we will jointly investigate solutions to the gaps and inaccuracies of this system and think of alternative models for biomedical R&D that promote knowledge-sharing. Please find the day program and more information below. To register for this event, contact Anne Dankert at [email protected]. Program 13.00 – 13.30 Arrival and registration 13.30 – 13.40 Introduction by Salmaan Sana, facilitator of the day 13.45 – 14.45 Panel A "Diagnosing the problem of the current R&D model" Introduction: A perspective on the lack of affordable access and innovation by James Love, Director of Knowledge Ecology International (KEI) - Marietje Schaake, Member of European Parliament- ALDE/D66 - Rohit Malpani, Director Policy and Analysis at MSF - Judith Sargentini, Member of European Parliament - Greens/GroenLinks - Júlia Montañà Lopez, UAEM Q&A 14.45 – 15.00 Coffee Break 15.00 – 15.30 Breakout sessions: ‘Pitches of innovation’ 1. WHO CEWG process as unique opportunity - by Sophie Bloemen, DNDi & Merle Schene, UAEM Respondent: Carlos Passerelli, UNAIDS 2.
    [Show full text]
  • De 26 Nederlanders in Het Europees Parlement 2
    De 26 Nederlanders in het Europees Parlement 2 Verklaring symbolen Telefoonnummer Brussel Telefoonnummers in Nederland en andere lidstaten GSM GSM Brussel Informatie in deze brochure is bijgewerkt tot februari 2013 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 3 Inhoudsopgave Biografieën 4 Contactgegevens Europarlementariërs 17 Voorlichters 21 Parlementaire commissies 23 Hoe werkt het Europees Parlement? 25 Zetelverdeling 26 Bezoeken 27 Adressen 28 Vergaderdata 29 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 4 In dit boekje vindt u de namen en contactgegevens van de 26 Nederlandse leden van het Europees Parlement. De Europarlementariërs van het CDA maken deel uit CDA van de fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen- Democraten) (EVP) Wim van de Camp (delegatieleider) Geboren 27-07-1953 te Oss. Hogere Landbouwschool voor Tropische Landbouw en studie Rechten aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Juridisch beleidsmedewerker bij de VNG (1982-1986). Lid van de Tweede Kamer (1986 -2009). Lid van het EP sinds 2009. Lid van de Commissie burgerlijke vrijheden, justitie en binnenlandse zaken. Plv. lid van de Commissie interne markt en consumentenbescherming. Plv. lid van de Bijzondere Commissie georganiseerde misdaad, corruptie en witwassen. Plv. lid van de Subcommissie mensenrechten. Lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met de Volksrepubliek China. Plv. lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met Albanië, Bosnië-Herzegovina, Servië, Montenegro en Kosovo. Esther de Lange Geboren 19-02-1975 te Spaubeek. Studie Hogere Europese Beroepsopleiding en Internationale Betrekkingen. Projectmedewerker FEANTSA (Europese federatie van dak- en thuislozenorganisaties) (1997). Medewerker Europese zaken twee Duitse brancheverenigingen (1998-1999). Beleidsmedewerker Europarlementariër (1999-2007). Voorzitter werkveldcommissie Hogere Europese Beroepen Opleiding, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (sinds 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation of Roma and Travellers in the Context of Rising Extremism, Xenophobia and the Refugee Crisis in Europe
    31st SESSION CPL31(2016)03final 20 October 2016 The situation of Roma and Travellers1 in the context of rising extremism, xenophobia and the refugee crisis in Europe Current Affairs Committee Rapporteur: 2 John WARMISHAM, United-Kingdom (L, SOC) Resolution 403(2016) .............................................................................................................................. 2 Recommendation 388(2016)................................................................................................................... 5 Explanatory memorandum ...................................................................................................................... 6 Summary The report assesses the situation of Roma and Travellers in Europe five years after Congress Resolution 333 (2011) on “Roma inclusion as a challenge for local and regional authorities”. It underlines that, despite numerous efforts, the circumstances not only have not improved, but appear to have worsened during the refugee crisis. Although Roma and Travellers had been suffering from exclusion and discrimination long before the refugee crisis started, and the direct impact of the crisis is limited, the indirect effects, such as eroding social cohesion and rise in violent crimes and hate speech, pose new problems to this vulnerable group. Local and regional authorities are at the forefront of responding to these new challenges, as they bear a great responsibility for the social inclusion of Roma and Travellers. The Congress reminds local and regional authorities
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS I 1960-2013
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2013 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2013 Klaus Armingeon, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2013 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institu- tional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Hand- lungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member coun- tries for the period of 1960 to 2013. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time- series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Com- position 1960-2013”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and eco- nomic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Note to the General Affairs Council of the European Union by the Hungarian Government on the Resolution on Hungary A
    Information Note to the General Affairs Council of the European Union by the Hungarian Government on the Resolution on Hungary adopted by the European Parliament on 12th of September 2018 I. Introduction The European Parliament adopted its Resolution of 12 September 2018 on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (hereafter referred to as reasoned proposal or Resolution, respectively). As a next step, the procedure continues in the Council of the European Union where it is up to the Council as a body to assess the issue at hand and decide if necessary. In this phase and in order to respond to the invitation of the European Parliament, Member States have to take their own position whether they see a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values of the Union, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU. As regards the procedural aspects of the Resolution of the European Parliament, the Hungarian Government’s position is that the method of calculating the votes on the Resolution constitutes a manifest breach of the essential procedural rules and it is deemed to be legally non-existent and void. Therefore, the Hungarian Government has brought a legal procedure to the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking for the annulment of the Resolution. Thus, the validity of the Resolution is to be decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS III 1990-2012
    Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET III 1990-2012 Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012 is a collection of political and institutional data. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for a group of 36 OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period 1990-20121. The data are primarily from the data set created at the University of Berne, Institute of Political Science and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation: The Comparative Political Data Set I (CPDS I). However, the present data set differs in several aspects from the CPDS I dataset. Compared to CPDS I Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus (Greek part), Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia have been added. The present data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time series analyses. The data set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD. For trade union membership, excellent data for European trade unions is provided by Jelle Visser (2013). When using the data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. This data set is to be cited as: Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler. 2014. Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Last updated: 2014-09-30 1 Data for former communist countries begin in 1990 for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Lativa and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia.
    [Show full text]