Fish Behaviour in Relation To
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 196: 12-16. 1993 Fish learning in response to trawl fishing Alexander I. Pyanov Pyanov, A. I. 1993. Fish learning in response to trawl fishing. - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 196: 12-16. Changes in defensive behaviour adaptive to trawl fishing were studied in some freshwater fish species under natural and experimental conditions. Under natural conditions, repeated hauls of a trawl were made across aggregations of bream (Abramis brama) and individuals were tracked with ultrasonic transmitters. In aquarium experiments, a small scale model trawl and two dip nets of different sizes were used for catching lemon and white tetra (Hemigrammus caudovittatus) and rosy barbs (Barbus conchonius). Conditioned avoidance reactions to the fishing gears were established in the bream under test after one to two hauls. The reaction was weak in young bream and strong in adults. Experienced individuals escaped from the path of the trawler at a distance of about 50 m before it reached them. The results of the aquarium experiments confirmed and augmented those obtained under natural conditions. Alexander I. Pyanov: Institute of Evolutionary Animal Morphology & Ecology, Leninsky Prospect, 33, Moscow 117071, Russian Federation. Introduction Investigations under natural conditions Fishing is the oldest anthropogenic factor influencing In this work data on trawl catches of bream (Abramis populations of many fish species. However, to date the brama L.) were used as well as echograms and tracking question of fish behavioural adaptation to this factor has experiment data on individuals tagged with ultrasonic remained practically uninvestigated, although it is well transmitters. These investigations were part of a study in known that defensive fish behaviour significantly influ 1979-1985 on spatial and temporal distribution of bream ences the success of fishing. in Votkinskoe reservoir, an area where commercial Innate unconditioned reactions and learned avoid trawl fishing has never been practised before. ance both influence fish defensive behaviour. It has been A trawler of 180 reg. tons and 150 h.p. engine was experimentally shown that fish as well as higher ver used, equipped with a bottom trawl having 10 mm mini tebrates can easily acquire conditioned reflexes to any mum mesh size and 18 m between otter boards. Re external stimulus for which these animals have corre peated tows through the same fish aggregation were sponding receptors (Frolov, 1925). The speed of acqui carried out at intervals from 1.5 h to 3 days, and tows sition of a simple conditioned reflex is approximately were also shifted to be parallel to each other. The equal in all vertebrates (Voronin, 1954). duration of tows ranged from 5 to 20 min. The distances Having observed fish behaviour during fishing, some between parallel tows varied from 15 to 50 m. Catches scientists raised the possibility that fish might have (fish/hectare) in 34 sets of two hauls and in 13 sets of four conditioned defensive reactions to active fishing gear hauls have been compared. (Golenchenko, 1955; Kuhorenko, 1977). Individual bream were tracked according to the stan It is well known that birds and mammals quickly learn dard underwater telemetry method. “Pinger” transmit to avoid hunters (Severtsov, 1922; Illichov, 1977). This ters 35 x 17 mm were used. Ten bream of 25-48 cm and kind of learning in fish has been demonstrated only as far 0.5-2.8 kg were caught with trawl and gillnets for tag as angling is concerned (Beukema, 1970; Fernö and ging. All 10 tagged fish were released at their place of Huse, 1983), so I report here an attempt to investigate capture. After that, attempts were made to catch them learned avoidance in fish to active fishing gears under in the trawl some time later (from 30 min to 9 days). Two natural and experimental conditions. or three trials were made with each individual. Tracking 12 3.0 -i parallel transects, one of them being shifted some dis tance horizontally from the other, was tested. Catches from two groups of hauls (10 and 19 pairs) were tested; the distance between transects was 8-10 m and 15-25 m s z o respectively (Table 1). Correlation coefficients for log n2 ffl o and log ni in these groups were r = +0.96 (p < 0.01) and •Dc r' = +0.80 (p < 0.01). The difference between these o c groups is not significant (r-test). So, the dependence of CD C/D 0.5 - the catches occurred even when the parallel shift of the second tow was 8-25 m from the first one, though the zone of trawl capture (distance between the trawl 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 boards) was 17 m. First catch (log n,) Bream aggregations consisted of fish from 3 to 17 Figure 1. Dependence of the second trawl catch upon the first years old. Analysis of the size and age structure of this one in consecutive trawlings in the same area. species revealed a trend towards a decrease in the proportion of adult individuals in the second trawl data on 20 other individuals tagged in the fishing area catches (Fig. 2). For bream less than 22 cm long (juven and nearby have been analysed. iles), the value of the ratio between second and first Additional data on fish behaviour and distribution catches log (n2/nj) fluctuated about one. during the hauls were obtained with an echo sounder, Thus, as a rule, the first catch from a bream aggre model “Skipper-406” (50 kHz). gation greatly exceeded subsequent catches, both in fish There was no commercial trawl fishing at Votkinskoe quantity and in mean fish length. reservoir; the main fishing gears used by local fishermen The control was as follows. At first, the vessel passed were gillnets and basket traps. Bream aggregations were above a fish aggregation without trawling, and then located in the channel zone of the reservoir at a depth towed the trawl in midwater. After that, consecutive from 8 to 14 m; this channel is the navigation route for hauls were carried out. The changes of catches in the vessels on the reservoir. control (six tests) and in the experiments appeared to be Comparing results of consecutive hauls through the the same. bream aggregations, it was found that the second catch The quantity and distribution of fish, before and after (log n2) was lower than, and depended significantly hauls, were registered in a series of tows with an echo upon, the first one (log ni) (r = +0.81, p < 0.01) (Table sounder fitted on the vessel. On the basis of these data a 1; Fig. 1). No correlation was found between the second catchability coefficient (CC) was calculated: CC = n/ and third catches (log n2 and log n3), nor between the N x 100%, where n is the catch and N is the fish quantity third and fourth catches (log n3 and log n4) (r = +0.27, in the trawl path. Some patterns of catchability changes p > 0.05; r' = +0.31, p > 0.05 respectively). are shown in Figure 3. In the daytime some bream The dependence of log n2 upon log ni regarding two located close to the bottom were not recorded, so the CC in the second example (day after first haul) turned out to be more than 100% (Fig. 3). However, for the present Table 1. Average fish catches in consecutive trawl tows purposes it is not the absolute values that are of import through bream aggregations. ance, but the trend of their changes. No. of Average no. of fish Haul order tows caught per tow s.e. s.d. Pair series : First catch 47 118.7 16.8 107.8 Second catch 47 43.4 7.8 50.2 Long series: c First catch 13 127.4 34.3 123.7 CN c Second catch 13 57.7 23.1 73.2 CD - 0.5 - Third catch 13 45.6 14.8 53.4 O _l Fourth catch 14 40.1 12.1 36.2 - 1 .0 - Laterally shifted hauls: 8-10 m First catch 10 178.2 52.8 158.5 - 1.5 Second catch 10 71.5 27.9 83.7 0 10 20 3040 50 15-25 m Fish length (cm) First catch 19 101.0 15.7 71.8 Second catch 19 50.8 10.3 47.1 Figure 2. Change in the value of the ratio of the second catch to the first one in different size groups of bream. 13 120-1 The experiments with white tetra were performed in a tank 500 x 70 x 35 cm. Two groups, 117 and 100 fish, 100 - c 25—15 mm long, from one aquarium, were used. The CD ö 80 - first group was transferred with water from the aquarium *=0 to the tank. Fish in the second group were captured with 8 60 - >< a lift net and with a dip net. Food was used to attract fish into the lift net. In the experiment, white tetra were I 40- « captured with a 1:30 scale model of the 18 m bottom -Co ra trawl. Two series of trials in each group, consisting of O three trials (hauls) at 1.5 h intervals, were carried out at 5 day intervals between series. Food was used to aggre 1 2 3 gate fish in the middle of the tank for trawl fishing. Haul Rosy barb, 589 fish, 25-40 mm length, were raised in Figure 3. Change of the catchability coefficient in consecutive an aquarium 273 x 97 x 45 cm from birth and had never hauls. * - during one day; + - in the next day after the first haul; been caught before the experiment.