DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Household Survey 2010 in the Gambia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Household Survey 2010 in the Gambia Government of The Gambia INTEGRATED HOUSEHOLD SURVEY INCOME AND EXPENDITURE POVERTY ASSESSMENT-2010 Gambia Bureau of Statistics December 2011 PART TWO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... V Concepts and Definitions ................................................................................................................ VI Preface............................................................................................................................................. IX Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ XI Key Findings ............................................................................................................................... XI Recommendations .................................................................................................................... XIV Chapter 1: Methodology of the analysis of The Gambia IHS 2010 ............................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives of the survey ................................................................................................................ 1 Sampling methodology ................................................................................................................. 2 The survey and the data files ......................................................................................................... 3 Data analysis ................................................................................................................................. 5 Methods for Poverty Analysis ....................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Demographic and household characteristics ............................................................. 10 Chapter 3: Household and per capita income ............................................................................ 17 Chapter 4: Household consumption............................................................................................ 23 Chapter 5: Poverty Analysis ....................................................................................................... 36 Determinants of poverty .............................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 6: Miscellaneous Income And Expenditure .................................................................. 53 Miscellaneous Income and Expenditure ..................................................................................... 54 Chapter 7: Remittances .............................................................................................................. 56 7.1 Remittances sent .............................................................................................................. 57 7.2 Remittance received ........................................................................................................ 59 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................................... 62 Annex 1: References ................................................................................................................. 62 Annex 2: National Urban Households Consumption based on IHS2010. ................................ 63 Annex 3: National Rural Households Consumption based on IHS2010. ................................... 72 Integrated Household Survey Income and Expenditure Poverty Assessment, 2010 Page I LIST OF TABLE Table 2. 1: Population, number of households, average household size and sample EAs and Households selected by Local Government Area ........................................................................... 10 Table 2. 2: Population by LGA and place of residence .................................................................. 10 Table 2. 3: Population by LGA/sub division and place of residence ............................................. 11 Table 2. 4 : Population Estimate for midyear 2010 and Sampling Weights for the 2010 HIS ....... 12 Table 2. 5 : Percentage distribution of the 2010 IHS sample population by age group and gender ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 2. 6: Percentage distribution of the listed household members by LGA/Subdivision and gender ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Table 2. 7: Percentage distribution of head of households by LGA and gender ............................ 16 Table 3. 1: Annual Household Income by Income category and LGA/Sub division ....................... 18 Table 3. 2 : Mean Per Capita Household Income by LGA/Subdivision and gender ...................... 19 Table 3. 3 : Annual per capita by income category by LGA/Sub division ...................................... 21 Table 4. 1: Consumption of selected Foods over the ‘Past Three Days’, which was not purchased ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 4. 2: National: Urban & Rural Households Consumption Report Combined...................... 28 Table 5. 1: Poverty Measures, 2010 ............................................................................................... 38 Table 5. 2: Percentage distribution of the Employed population living below USD1.25 per day by age group and gender ..................................................................................................................... 39 Table 5. 3 : Total Household Consumption by Quintile, 1998 – 2010 ........................................... 40 Table 5. 4: Average Household Consumption 2010 ....................................................................... 40 Table 5. 5: Mean Per Capita Expenditure in Dalasi by LGA and residence ................................. 41 Table 5. 6 : Inequality in Per Capita Expenditure Distribution by place of residence in 2003 and 2010................................................................................................................................................. 41 Table 5. 7 : Poverty Rate from less than $1 - $2 and above per person per day consumption by residence ......................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 5. 8: Poverty rates by Local Government Area less than $1 to $2 and above per day ........ 43 Table 5. 9 : Poverty Rate by Gender of the household head less than $1 to $2 and above per day ......................................................................................................................................................... 44 Table 5. 10: Mean per capita household consumption by gender of the household head and residence ......................................................................................................................................... 45 Table 5. 11: Poverty Rate by the Household head highest level of education completed .............. 47 Table 5. 12: Poverty Rate by Sector of Employment of the Household Head ................................ 48 Table 5. 13: Poverty Rate by Status in Employment of the Household Head ................................. 49 Table 5. 14: Poverty Rate by Status in Employment of the Household Head ................................. 50 Table 5. 15: Poverty rates by Age Group, less than $1 per day poverty line ................................. 51 Table 5. 16: Poverty rates by Age Group, less than $1.25 per day poverty line ............................ 52 Table 6. 1: Table 6.1 : Receipt from sale of used items (Module G) .............................................. 53 Integrated Household Survey Income and Expenditure Poverty Assessment, 2010 Page II Table 6. 2: Miscellaneous income in past 12 months by households ............................................. 54 Table 6. 3: Expenditure in past 12 months by households in cash and kind .................................. 54 Table 7. 1: Value of Remittance Sent by type, background Characteristics of recipient and period. ......................................................................................................................................................... 57 Table 7. 2 : Value remittances Sent by region and type ................................................................. 58 Table 7. 3: Value of Remittance received by type, background Characteristics of remitter and period. ............................................................................................................................................. 59 Table 7. 4: Value of remittances received by region and type ........................................................ 60 Integrated Household Survey Income and Expenditure Poverty Assessment, 2010 Page III LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Population Pyramid of the IHS 2010 Sampled Population ............................................ 14 Figure 2: Poverty Rates by place of residence for less $1 and $1.25 per day ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OP6 SGP Gambia Country Programme Strategy
    The GEF- Small Grants Programme Country Programme Strategy for the Sixth Operational Phase Period: 2015 – 2018 Country: THE GAMBIA Resources to be invested: US $3. 3 million Co-funding: US $1. 5 million (GEF MSP) 1 Table of contents 1.0 Background ……………………………………………………………………………………. 7 1.1 Summary background on SGP country programme ………………………………….. 7 2.0 SGP country programme niche ………………………………………………………............... 9 3.0 OP 6 strategies ………………………………………………………………………................11 3.1 Cross-cutting OP 6 grant-making strategies ………………………………………….11 3.2 Landscape/seascape-based OP6 grant-making strategies ……………………………. 12 3.3 Selection criteria for the target landscape/seascape …………………………………...12 3.4 Opportunities for synergy with other initiatives/partners ……………………………..13 3.5 Additional funds and resources to be mobilised ……………………………………....15 3.6 Global Biodiversity significance of the selected landscapes/seascapes ………………15 3.6.1 Kiang West National Park ………………………………………………15 3.6.2 Bao Bolong Wetland Reserve …………………………………………...15 3.6.3 Jokadou National Park …………………………………………………..16 3.7 Description of the selected landscapes/seascapes ……………………………………..16 3.7.1 Location …………………………………………………………… ……16 3.7.2 Climate …………………………………………………………………. 17 3.7.3 Geology and soils ………………………………………………………. 17 3.7.4 Vegetation ……………………………………………………………….17 3.7.5 Biodiversity …………………………………………………………….. 18 3.7.6 Socio-economic conditions …………………………………………….. 18 3.8 Selected priority initiatives for OP 6 …………………………………………………18 4.0 Landscape Baseline Assessment and SEPL of the target area …………………………20 5.0 Major threats of the Landscapes/Seascapes ………………………………………..... 21 6.0 Major opportunities of the target landscapes/seascapes ……………………………… 22 2 7.0 The Landscape/Seascape strategy …………………………………………………….. 22 7.1 Vision ……………………………………………………………………................ 22 8.0 Main Outcomes and Impact Indicators …………………………………………………….. 23 8.1 Project Outcomes and Indicators ………………………………………………………23 9.0 Typology of Potential projects ……………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study
    The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department FOREWORD This report was prepared by the Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department (OITC), under the supervision and gui- dance of Mr. Jean Kizito Kabanguka, Manager, Transport Division 1. The assignment was managed by Mr. Aaron Mwila, Senior Transport Engineer (OITC). The report was drafted by Mr. Micah Olaseni Ajijo (Consultant Transport Economist) with contributions of several experts in the Transport and ICT Department who reviewed the draft and provided valuable comments, data and information. Special thanks also go to Government of the Republic of The Gambia for providing the Bank Team maximum support in finalizing this report. THE GAMBIA : Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................................................................V Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... VI I - The sector development context.....................................................................................................................1 1.1. The Geographic and Demographic Factors .............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • SCOPE of WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road
    Reinforced Access of the most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio – economic Facilities through a Feeder Road Rehabilitation Programme ANNEX C – SCOPE OF WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road EUROPEAN UNION NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ‘Reinforced Access of the Most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio-economic Facilities through a Feeder Roads Rehabilitation Programme’ funded by the European Union Delegation and is being implemented by the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) in The Gambia. It aims to enhance socio-economic developments around road networks, provide employment, increase household income and thereby reduce poverty among vulnerable populations including female headed households and youth in rural Gambia. The rehabilitation of the feeder roads will be achieved through a combination of labour-based methods and machine-based methods. 10 feeder roads with a total of 104.4km have been identified for rehabilitation. The feeder roads are distributed across the North Bank Region, Central River Region and Upper River Region of the country. The selected roads are: • Road 1: Soto Masamba to Numuyel to Trunk Road (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 2: Chamoi to Dampha Kunda to Tamba Sansang (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 3: Alkali Kunda to North Bank Trunk Road (Upper Badibu, NBR), • Road 4: Suduwol to Nyamanari to Fatoto (Kantora, URR), • Road 5: Galleh Manda to South Bank Trunk Road (Fulladu West, CRR), • Road 6: Illiasa to Katchang (Upper Badibou, NBR), • Road 7: Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba (Tumana, URR), • Road 8: Fass to Kerr Jane (Lower Niumi, NBR). • Road 9: Baja Kunda to Boro Kanda Kasseh (Wulli, URR), • Road 10: Kerewan to Njawara (Lower Badibou, NBR) SCOPE OF WORKS This scope of works is for the rehabilitation of Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba road in Tumana and Kantora Districts, Upper River Region of The Gambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Land Sector Governance in the Gambia
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING LAND SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN THE GAMBIA Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation of the Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) Public Disclosure Authorized AMIE BENSOUDA & CO LP OFF BERTIL HARDING HIGHWAY NO. SSHFC CRESCENT KANIFING INSTITUTIONAL AREA Public Disclosure Authorized KANIFING MUNICIPALITY Email – [email protected] Telephone Nos. 4495381 / 4496453 AUGUST 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement 3 Acronyms 4 1. Executive Summary 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 LGAF Methodology 6 1.3 Overview of Land Policy Issues in the Gambia 7 1.4 Assessment of Land Governance in the Gambia 11 1.5 Policy Priorities 23 1.6 Conclusion 26 2. Consolidated Scorecard 27 3. Introduction 31 4. Methodology 32 4.1 Adapting the LGAF to the Country Situation 32 4.2 Government Engagement 32 4.3 Collection of Background Data and Panel Workshops 33 5. Context 34 5.1 Geographical Description 34 5.2 Historical Evolution 35 5.35.2 Key Social and Economic Indicators 35 5.4 Administrative Structure 37 5.5 Political System 37 5.6 Land Tenure System 39 5.6.1 Historical Context 39 5.6.2 Freehold Title 39 5.6.3 Leasehold 41 5.6.4 Deemed Lease 41 5.6.5 Customary Tenure 41 5.6.6 Forests Parks, Wild Life Reserves and Land Acquired for Public Purposes 42 5.6.7 Area and Population by Tenure Type 42 6. Tenure Typology 43 6.1 Institutional Map 49 6.2 Urban Planning 55 6.3 Three Growth Centres of Brikama, Farafenni and Basse 56 6.4 The Tourism Development Area (TDA) 56 6.5 Forestry 57 6.6 Current Situation 57 7.
    [Show full text]
  • MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7Th to 12Th April 2014
    80 OAU Boulevard, Banjul, The Gambia TEL: 4201535/4201537/3960636/9960633 Website: www.legalaid.gov.gm EMAIL: [email protected] MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7th to 12th April 2014 MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 2. Project Sensitization.........................................................................................................5 3. Implementation of the Mobile Legal Aid Clinic ............................................................5 A. Upper River Region ....................................................................................................5 I. Kantora District ................................................................................................5 II. Fuladu East, Basse District………………………………………………………………………..7 a) Basse Police Station………………….………………………………….……………..8 b) Mansanjang Kunda……...……………………………………………….9 III. Tumana District ..............................................................................................10 a) Chamoi…………………………….…………………………...……….10 b) Follow up with the Governor on issues raised………..…….….……….11 B. North Bank Region……………...………………………………………………………………12 I. Sabachsanjal District….……………..………..…………………………………………….12 a) Dibbakunda………………………………………………….……………13 b) Radio Program…………………………………..….…………………….……..13 II. Central Badibu District….………………………..….……………………………………..…14 a) Farafenni Police Station……………………………...……..………………………..……..15
    [Show full text]
  • Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in the Gambia
    Government of The Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in The Gambia September 2010 Acknowledgment The RJA Team thanks the Governor’s and Mayor’s Offices as well as the Regional Disaster Management Committees in the six regions for guiding the sub-teams during their field visits. The Team also thanks all the village and/or community members who took their time to speak to the Team and participated in the interviews and discussions. Acronyms BCC Banjul City Council CRR Central River Region EmOC Emergency Obstetric Care FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation GBOS Gambia Bureau of Statistics IDP Internally Displaced Person KMC Kanifing Municipal Council LRR Lower River Region NBR North Bank Region NDMA National Disaster Management Agency NERICA New Rice for Africa NFI Non-Food Item NGO Non-Governmental Organisation ORS Oral Rehydration Solution PHC Primary Health Centre RH Reproductive Health RJA Rapid Joint Assessment RDMC Regional Disaster Management Committee STI Sexually Transmitted Infection UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund URR Upper River Region VDC Village Development Committee WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation WR Western Region Cover photography: Flooded city centre of Basse (URR) 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Mobile Qos Report
    November 2016 MONTHLY MOBILE QOS REPORT Comparative Quality of Service Report for Mobile Networks Technical Report November 2017 1 November 2017 Contents 1. Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ............................................................................................. 4 3. KPIs & Threshold Used in Report ................................................................................................. 6 4. Findings 1: 2G Networks................................................................................................................. 7 5. Findings 2: Graphs .......................................................................................................................... 10 6. Findings 3: CELL Outages ............................................................................................................. 12 7. Findings 4: Percentage Change in Traffic ................................................................................ 12 7.1. Voice Traffic ................................................................................................................................. 12 7.2. Data Traffic ................................................................................................................................... 13 8. Number of Cells Deployed ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Tonga in the Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone
    15-15 WORKSHOP IN POLITICAL THEORY AND POLICY ANALYSIS 513 NORTH PARK INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON, IN 47408-3895 U.S.A. Resiliency and Change in Common Property Regimes in West Africa: The Case of the Tonga in The Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone Mark Schoonmaker Freudenberger Aiah R. Lebbie Judith Carney The International Association for I The Study of Common Property Fifth Common Property Conference "Reinventing the Commons 24-28 May, 1995 Bode, Norway Figure 1: Map of Case Study Sites Atlantic SENEGAL Ocean SENEGAL 1. Font Jarrol District 2. Klang West District I 3. Upper Baddibou District MAURITANIA 4. Sami District 5. Sandu District 6. Upper Guinea Region 7. Middle Guinea Region THE GAMBIA 8. Moyamba District IVORY COAST I GHANA I Resiliency and Change in Common Property Regimes in West Africa: The Case of the Tongo in The Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone Mark Schoonmaker Freudenberger1 Aiah R. Lebbie Judith Carney I. Introduction The African commons are valuable though often ecologically threatened sources of food and fiber products for urban and rural populations. Particularly around resources of great use Iand exchange value, rural communities in many parts of West Africa create rules and conventions to define rights of access and conditions of sustainable use. Recent case studies highlight the considerable rule-making capacity of West African rural institutions despite the erosion of rural authority required to enforce sanctions (Berry,, 1988; IFAD, 1992; Shepard, 1991; Thomson, 1992). Many of these local-level tenure regimes create community protected areas - common property regimes that regulate access to forest commons, sacred groves, fishing ponds, and grazing areas (Price, 1991; Fischer, 1994; Djibo et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Mobile Qos Report
    December 2016 MONTHLY MOBILE QOS REPORT Comparative Quality of Service Report for Mobile Networks Technical Report August 2017 1 May 2017 Contents 1. Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ............................................................................................. 4 3. KPIs & Threshold Used in Report ................................................................................................. 6 4. Findings 1: 2G Networks................................................................................................................. 7 5. Findings 2: Graphs .......................................................................................................................... 11 6. Findings 3: CELL Outages ............................................................................................................. 13 7. Findings 4: Percentage Change in Traffic ................................................................................ 13 7.1. Voice Traffic ................................................................................................................................. 13 7.2. Data Traffic ................................................................................................................................... 14 8. Number of Cells Deployed ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Coding Instructions for 1993 Population and Housing Census A. General
    CODING INSTRUCTIONS FOR 1993 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS A. GENERAL (i) PURPOSE OF CODING Coding, is yet another key step in data processing. It constitutes the link between the raw data collected by the interviewers and the input for the computer programs through which the required statistical tables can be later generated. Coding is a process by which questionnaire entries are assigned a numeric code for ease of data entry. (iii) MATERIALS NEEDED: For doing the coding, you need: - a completed questionnaire - coding instructions - red pen. B. GENERAL GUIDELINES TO EDITORS/VERIFIERS AND CODERS: - Do not erase what has been coded. Always strike out inaccurate or inappropriate Codes and write legible codes using your red pen above or besides the original entry. - The questionnaire does not call for blank entries nor should blanks appear in the Codes. There is a code number for each question or answer (including not stated and not applicable) and this code should always be indicated in the appropriate place. - One or more questionnaire(s) may be Completed for some households - in this case, you should ensure that all the questionnaire(s) filled for each household is coded before proceeding to another household. The arrangement of household according to serial numbering order is important. Also verify that all questionnaires handled belong to the local government area and same enumeration area. - Always seek assistance from your supervisor whenever in doubt at any given stage of the editing/verifying and coding stage. 1 THE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM A) AND INSTITUTIONALISED POPULATION (FORM B) C. SPECIFICS OF FORM A 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Prodoc Appencies
    Country: Republic of the Gambia Project Title: Enhancing Resilience of Vulnerable Coastal Areas and Communities to Climate Change ProDoc Appencies Appendix Page Appendix A - Sea and River Defence Risk Management (SRDRM) - A proposed way 2 forward for Gambia. Appendix B – Pilot Intervention Option Assessment, Appraisal and Selection. 7 Appendix C – Relevant National Initiatives. 94 Appendix D – Report on Consultations with local communities. 97 Appendix E – UNDP Gambia SPG Projects . 122 Appendix F – Dimensions of the Proposed National Coastal Zone Monitoring 123 Programme. Appendix G – Component Outcomes, Activities and budget. 127 Appendix H - Risk Analysis. 142 Appendix I – ToR for Sea and River Defence Engineer and Memorandums of 144 Understanding. Appendix J - Terms of Reference for Project Board and Key Capacity Resources. 147 Appendix K – Agreement Letters. 158 Appendix L – Stakeholder Capacity Assessment and HACT capacity. 161 Appendix M - CC-A Tracking Tool (AMAT). 181 Appendix N - Special Clauses. 190 Appendix O – Stakeholder Workshop (Draft Prodoc Validation): 8 December 2012. 194 1 Appendix A - Sea and River Defence Risk Management (SRDRM) - A proposed way forward for Gambia A1 Introduction to the SRDRM Programme The Sea and River Defence Risk Management Programme (SRDRMP) has been discussed with national Gambian stakeholders as is agreed as being the new term that should be used to take forward strategic management of the Gambia coastal zone (see Appendix N). A Policy Document for SRDRM, that is endorsed by GoG is the ultimate aim and this is included within Compoent 1 of the project. This shall outline visions, goals, policies and objectives for management of sea and river defence and asset infrastructure in Gambia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition
    The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition: Promoting Conservation in The Gambia Through Grassroots Environmental Education By Francisca E. Paulete A REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2006 This report, “The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition: Promoting Conservation Through Grassroots Environmental Education,” is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Signatures: Advisor _______________________________________ Dr. Blair D. Orr Dean _________________________________________ Dr. Margaret R. Gale Date _________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………… ii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………..... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………... iv ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………….. vi LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ......…………………………………………………............ viii CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………….. 1 CHAPTER 2 – BACKGROUND OF THE GAMBIA …………………………………..…….. 4 General Description ………………………………………………………...... 4 Climate & Topography ……………………………………………………..... 6 History of The Gambia ………………………………………………………. 7 Colonial Control & Slavery ………………………………………………..… 10 Government & Political Conditions ……………………………………….… 12 Economy & Resources ……………………………………………………...... 14 The People ……………………………………………………………………. 15 Environmental Status ….……………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]