Prodoc Appencies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prodoc Appencies Country: Republic of the Gambia Project Title: Enhancing Resilience of Vulnerable Coastal Areas and Communities to Climate Change ProDoc Appencies Appendix Page Appendix A - Sea and River Defence Risk Management (SRDRM) - A proposed way 2 forward for Gambia. Appendix B – Pilot Intervention Option Assessment, Appraisal and Selection. 7 Appendix C – Relevant National Initiatives. 94 Appendix D – Report on Consultations with local communities. 97 Appendix E – UNDP Gambia SPG Projects . 122 Appendix F – Dimensions of the Proposed National Coastal Zone Monitoring 123 Programme. Appendix G – Component Outcomes, Activities and budget. 127 Appendix H - Risk Analysis. 142 Appendix I – ToR for Sea and River Defence Engineer and Memorandums of 144 Understanding. Appendix J - Terms of Reference for Project Board and Key Capacity Resources. 147 Appendix K – Agreement Letters. 158 Appendix L – Stakeholder Capacity Assessment and HACT capacity. 161 Appendix M - CC-A Tracking Tool (AMAT). 181 Appendix N - Special Clauses. 190 Appendix O – Stakeholder Workshop (Draft Prodoc Validation): 8 December 2012. 194 1 Appendix A - Sea and River Defence Risk Management (SRDRM) - A proposed way forward for Gambia A1 Introduction to the SRDRM Programme The Sea and River Defence Risk Management Programme (SRDRMP) has been discussed with national Gambian stakeholders as is agreed as being the new term that should be used to take forward strategic management of the Gambia coastal zone (see Appendix N). A Policy Document for SRDRM, that is endorsed by GoG is the ultimate aim and this is included within Compoent 1 of the project. This shall outline visions, goals, policies and objectives for management of sea and river defence and asset infrastructure in Gambia. The philosophy of the SRDRMP is to prepare a simple and concise national policy document that sets the scene for the management of infrastructure in Gambia’s coastal environment, including river defences that fall within the defined coastal zone. Figure A1.1 demonstrates the purpose and benefit of GoG to consider jointly river and sea defences within the delivery of this new framework. Figure A1.1 Conceptual Overview of SRDRM 2 A2 Purpose and Need for the Intervention The following text helps to provide the justification text that is presented in Section 2 of the LDCF Prodoc. The pressures of climate change, sea level rise, coastal habitat destruction and socio-economic regeneration of the Gambian coastal zone are very well documented. Climate change is a fact. Its effect on the coast is now becoming clearly evident. Already, Gambia has seen coastal features (including beaches, mangroves, sandbanks etc) beginning to change more dramatically and often in unpredictable ways. Many coastal livelihoods are increasingly threatened by coastal flooding and erosion and the reality of rising sea levels and increased storm frequency will inevitably increase that risk. Of equal concern is the apparent lack of strategic delivery of a sustainable and strategic sea and river defence risk management approach policy to address these concerns. Coastal protection and sea defence structures are currently not planned with regard to their purpose, their outcome and importantly, their long term maintenance costs. Despite the professional efforts of the Ministry of Works (MoW) and the National Environment Agency (NEA) to address the problems being faced, the approach to shore protection (at present) is reactionary and without long term national planning mechanisms in place. Effective planning and implementation will be paramount, if the global objectives of flood risk minimization and the protection of coastal infrastructure, populations and livelihoods are to be realised. Funding for a new Sea and River Defence (SRD) Sector must be allocated with long-term goals in mind. A new approved Policy Framework for a new Gambian SRD sector, which sets out a strategic approach to the operations of the sea defence department of the MoW is now required. An important aspect of this strategic plan (as part of this LDCF project) is the gradual move and adoption of a broad based model for management of the coastal zone. An updated policy framework is recommended to incorporate a Sea and River Defence Risk Management Programme (SRDRMP). The SRDRMP will outline the visions, goals, policies and objectives for management of sea and river defence and asset infrastructure in Gambia. The philosophy of the SRDRMP is to prepare a simple and concise national policy document that sets the scene for the management of infrastructure in Gambias’ coastal environment, including river defences that fall within the defined coastal zone. To the forefront of the risk management plan, will be the promotion of “resilience.” Resilience is presented as a core principle within the SRDRMP for the following reasons: To be resilient is to be able to respond to, recover or quickly repair from damage or hardship. In this regard, the concept of resilience recognises external physical and natural pressures. It is important to recognise that coastal processes are natural and will occur independently of human actions. The concept of resilience establishes a management approach that is directed at how people respond to these coastal processes. The concept of resilience recognises the importance of human behaviour and management. The philosophy behind this approach is that communities need to be responsible for their own actions and how these actions increase/decrease hazard risk. The concept of resilience recognises that hazards cannot be eliminated and as a result, it recommended for adoption in Gambia under the SRDRMP, as it acknowledges that particularly in the Gambian context, there is always hazard risk. Hence, in a number of cases, management approaches will need to be focused on risk minimization and preparedness, rather than avoidance or elimination. The concept also avoids any suggestion of bias towards a particular management approach, such as reliance on physical protection works (seawalls etc). The concept of resilience, in the Gambian context, promotes the retention of natural systems (e.g.: mangroves), recognising the implicit resilience in such systems (e.g. that hazard risk is associated with human activities and 3 property). It is also noted that the concept of ‘resilience’ is increasingly used in reference to the management and planning for both hazards and natural disasters. A Sea and River Defence Investment Management Plan (SRDIMP) for each SRD District Region in Gambia is proposed as an important Key Performance Indicator (KPI) which should be prepared as part of the GoG’s Sea and River Defence Risk Management Programme (SRDRMP). The SRDIMP is seen as one of the primary means of implementing the SRDRM Programme which was hoped to be formally approved by the GoG in 2016, as providing the strategic direction for the management of infrastructure (both public and private) within the coastal area. The success of the SRDRMP will require the development of individual District’s Sea & River Defence Infrastructure Management Plan (SRDIMP’s) within the overall planning framework of the existing or new planning which need to consider sustainable land use, within a formal land-use planning mechanism. This would provide the policy and development standards for implementation of a new development approval process. The SRDRM process needs to ensure the integration of land use planning and other "soft" river and coastal defence systems. This is likely to be a more effective way of promoting "resilience" rather than focusing on continuous construction of sea and river defence structures. The use of land use planning and development standards in the Gambian coastal zone is often considered to be a more sustainable strategy to address the issues of illegal coastal reclamation, wetland destruction and sand mining. The aim of the SRDIMP is to help MoW and NEA to show a transparent process towards setting priority intervention measures that are auditable and based on sound and sustainable engineering best practice. They are also the key communication tool for District communities to convey coastal hazards and from this to improve coastal resilience for local communities by identifying actions and solutions. Not all the proposed solutions presented in the SRDIMP may be actioned immediately, and so it is for this reason that each SRDIMP shall present investment opportunities over a range of time periods (0-3yrs, 3-10 yrs, 10-20 years) which shall be updated on an annual basis (possibly as part of a new NEA Annual “State of the Coast” Reporting approach) using new condition assessment information to review, monitor and evaluate SRDIMP recommendations being presented for long-term improvement in resilience of both infrastructure and communities. Each SRDIMP will: 1. Set priority intervention measures that are auditable and based on sound and sustainable engineering best practice; 2. Improve the community’s awareness of sea and river hazard risks (through improved map production and clear presentation of risks to “non-experts”); 3. Provide advice on techniques to reduce coastal hazard risks in settlements; 4. Provide “self-help” advice to community and infrastructure providers to better adapt, respond and recover from storm events. The development of the SRDRMP and SRDIMP is primarily aimed at ensuring that stakeholders in Gambia are aware of the risk inherently associated with poor planning and development within the coastal zone and that interventions are made at the
Recommended publications
  • Gambia Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2017
    EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION FINAL REPORT The GAMBIA National Assembly Elections 6 April 2017 European Union Election Observation Missions are independent from the European Union institutions.The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. EU Election Observation Mission to The Gambia 2017 Final Report National Assembly Elections – 6 April 2017 Page 1 of 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 4 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 9 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 9 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM ................................................................................. 11 A. Universal and Regional Principles and Commitments ............................................................................. 11 B. Electoral Legislation ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the State of Implementation of Praia Orientations (On Land Tenure) in the Gambia
    1 THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA REVIEW OF THE STATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PRAIA ORIENTATIONS (ON LAND TENURE) IN THE GAMBIA 2 REVIEW OF THE STATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PRAIA ORIENTATIONS (ON LAND TENURE) IN THE GAMBIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1. Context and Justification ..................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................... 4 1.1.4 Terms of Reference for the Study ........................................................................ 5 1.2 Country Profile............................................................................................................ 6 1.2.1 Physical Characteristics........................................................................................ 6 1.2.2 Political Characteristics........................................................................................ 6 1.2.3 Social Characteristics............................................................................................ 6 2 MAIN LAND USE SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Forestry Conflict Management in Central River Division, the Gambia
    CASE STUDY 2 Who owns Kayai Island? Community forestry conflict management in Central River division, the Gambia By A. Dampha, K. Camara, A. Jarjusey, M. Badjan and K. Jammeh, Forestry Department, the Gambia and National Consultancy for Forestry Extension and Training Services (NACO) Edited by A.P. Castro SUMMARY Kayai and Saruja villages are located on opposite sides of the River Gambia. Between them is Kayai Island, whose 784 ha consists mainly of forest reserve containing economically valuable species and a large wildlife population.The people of Kayai village regard the island as falling within their traditional lands. In the 1950s, the colonial government, without consulting Kayai village, gave farm plots on the island to people in Saruja as compensation for land annexed by an agricultural project. Since then, several disputes have arisen between the two villages over ownership of the island. Attempts to resolve the conflict, including though court adjudication, proved unsuccessful. The latest clash was provoked by the government’s recent participatory forestry initiative, which empowers communities to manage forest lands. This decentralization of public forestry administration seeks to foster sustainable natural resource management, addressing shortcomings in the State forestry that has been in operation since colonial times. A proposal by Kayai village to set up a community forest on the island met with resistance from Saruja villagers, who refused to sign the agreement approving it. The people of Saruja feared losing their rice fields, gardens and orchards and their access to forest products. As in the past, public and forestry officials’ efforts to resolve the conflict were not successful.
    [Show full text]
  • OP6 SGP Gambia Country Programme Strategy
    The GEF- Small Grants Programme Country Programme Strategy for the Sixth Operational Phase Period: 2015 – 2018 Country: THE GAMBIA Resources to be invested: US $3. 3 million Co-funding: US $1. 5 million (GEF MSP) 1 Table of contents 1.0 Background ……………………………………………………………………………………. 7 1.1 Summary background on SGP country programme ………………………………….. 7 2.0 SGP country programme niche ………………………………………………………............... 9 3.0 OP 6 strategies ………………………………………………………………………................11 3.1 Cross-cutting OP 6 grant-making strategies ………………………………………….11 3.2 Landscape/seascape-based OP6 grant-making strategies ……………………………. 12 3.3 Selection criteria for the target landscape/seascape …………………………………...12 3.4 Opportunities for synergy with other initiatives/partners ……………………………..13 3.5 Additional funds and resources to be mobilised ……………………………………....15 3.6 Global Biodiversity significance of the selected landscapes/seascapes ………………15 3.6.1 Kiang West National Park ………………………………………………15 3.6.2 Bao Bolong Wetland Reserve …………………………………………...15 3.6.3 Jokadou National Park …………………………………………………..16 3.7 Description of the selected landscapes/seascapes ……………………………………..16 3.7.1 Location …………………………………………………………… ……16 3.7.2 Climate …………………………………………………………………. 17 3.7.3 Geology and soils ………………………………………………………. 17 3.7.4 Vegetation ……………………………………………………………….17 3.7.5 Biodiversity …………………………………………………………….. 18 3.7.6 Socio-economic conditions …………………………………………….. 18 3.8 Selected priority initiatives for OP 6 …………………………………………………18 4.0 Landscape Baseline Assessment and SEPL of the target area …………………………20 5.0 Major threats of the Landscapes/Seascapes ………………………………………..... 21 6.0 Major opportunities of the target landscapes/seascapes ……………………………… 22 2 7.0 The Landscape/Seascape strategy …………………………………………………….. 22 7.1 Vision ……………………………………………………………………................ 22 8.0 Main Outcomes and Impact Indicators …………………………………………………….. 23 8.1 Project Outcomes and Indicators ………………………………………………………23 9.0 Typology of Potential projects ……………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • An Application of Small Area Estimation
    Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE Public Disclosure Authorized MAP IN THE GAMBIA An Application of Small Area Estimation Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE MAP IN THE GAMBIA November 2018 1 | Page This publication is prepared with the support of the Country Management Unit West Africa Poverty Monitoring Code (WAPMC - P164474). Extracts may be published if source is duly acknowledged. Copyright © 2018 by The Gambia Bureau of Statistics The Statistician General P. O. Box 3504, Serekunda, The Gambia Tel. +220 4377847 Fax: +220 4377848 Authors Rose Mungai Minh Cong Nguyen Tejesh Pradhan Supervisor Andrew Dabalen Graphic presentation of the data Minh Cong Nguyen Editor Lauri Scherer Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 The Gambia country context ...................................................................................................... 8 2. Overview of the Methodology ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study
    The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department The Gambia Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department FOREWORD This report was prepared by the Transport, Urban Development and ICT Department (OITC), under the supervision and gui- dance of Mr. Jean Kizito Kabanguka, Manager, Transport Division 1. The assignment was managed by Mr. Aaron Mwila, Senior Transport Engineer (OITC). The report was drafted by Mr. Micah Olaseni Ajijo (Consultant Transport Economist) with contributions of several experts in the Transport and ICT Department who reviewed the draft and provided valuable comments, data and information. Special thanks also go to Government of the Republic of The Gambia for providing the Bank Team maximum support in finalizing this report. THE GAMBIA : Transport Sector Diagnostic Study Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................................................................V Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... VI I - The sector development context.....................................................................................................................1 1.1. The Geographic and Demographic Factors .............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Farafenni Dss, the Gambia
    Farafenni Demographic Surveillance System (Member of the INDEPTH Network) Profile of the FARAFENNI DSS, THE GAMBIA March, 2004 1. Physical geography and Population Characteristics of the Farafenni DSA The Gambia is the smallest continental country in Africa, with a land area of just 10 360 km2 (480 km from east to west and on average 48 km from north to south) and a total population of 1.4 million in July 2000 (Figure 1). It is surrounded by Senegal, with which it once shared a short-lived federation (‘Senegambia”), from 1982 to 1989. The town of Farafenni is on the north bank of the Gambia River, about 170 km inland from the capital, Banjul. The main road between Dakar and the Casamance crosses the Gambia River at Farafenni, which has a ferry suitable for heavy vehicles. The average annual rainfall, measured at the Farafenni field station in 1989-99, was 683 mm, but the relative variability is large (22.6%), with amounts in the 11-year period ranging from 515 mm in 1991 to 1000 mm in 1999. The Gambia has a single rainy season, extending from June to October, with peak rains in August. The vegetation is dry savannah, with scattered trees, but in the rainy season, grasses and bushes grow strongly. Rice is cultivated in the river bottoms and in the upland areas where millet, sorghum, and other cereals are the staple food crops. Figure 1: Location of the Farafenni DSS site, The Gambia. 2. Population characteristics of the Farafenni DSA The surveillance site is located in a rural area between latitudes 130 and 140N and longitudes 150 and 160W and comprises 40 small villages, extending 32 km to the east and 22 km to the west of the town of Farafenni (1993 population, 21,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Listado De Abogados En Gambia
    ANTENA DIPLOMÁTICA DE ESPAÑA MINISTERIO Banjul DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES, UNIÓN EUROPEA Y COOPERACION Listado de abogados en Gambia Mr. Musa Batchilly 70B Hagan Street Banjul, The Gambia Tel: 00220 9912128 Email: [email protected] Información sobre está oficina • El personal habla Ingles • Está afiliada a la Asociación de Abogados de Gambia • especializaciones en Práctico General que incluye civil, mercantil y criminal litigaciones • Tiene experiencia en representar Británicos • Puede proveer asistencia legal • Puede ofrecer un servicio Pro Bono • El personal habla mandinka, wollof, Fulla • Cubre {el país entero o regiones} y (Banjul and Brikama) • No tiene oficinas internacionales Deloitte Building CORREO ELECTRÓNICO: [email protected] Bertil Harding Highway TEL.: (+220) 44 66 101 Koloi, Banjul P.O. Box 2981 Serrakunda ANTENA DIPLOMÁTICA DE ESPAÑA MINISTERIO Banjul DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES, UNIÓN EUROPEA Y COOPERACION Amie Bensouda & CO SSHFC Crescent, Off Bertil Harding Highway, Kanifing Institutional area, P.O. Box 907, Banjul, The Gambia Phone: +2204496453, +2204201995 Fax: +2204496453 Email:[email protected] Informacion sobre esta oficina: • El personal habla Ingles • Está afiliada a la Asociación de Abogados de Gambia • Especializaciones en Civil y Criminal Litigación, Empresarial, mercantil, Fusiones y Adquisiciones, Inmuebles, Propiedad Intelectual, Familia y Autentificación, Marítimo, Energía, Telecomunicaciones, Petróleo y Gas, Trabajo y Empleo, Asuntos regulatorios y Borradores legislativos, Asesoría en ley Pública • Tiene experiencia en representar Británicos • Puede proveer asistencia legal • Puede ofrecer un servicio Pro Bono • El personal habla Inglés, mandinka, wollof, Fulla, Krio • Cubre el país entero • No tiene oficinas internacionales Deloitte Building CORREO ELECTRÓNICO: [email protected] Bertil Harding Highway TEL.: (+220) 44 66 101 Koloi, Banjul P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia – Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200557
    Measuring results, sharing lessons sharing Measuring results, OPERATION EVALUATION The Gambia – Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200557 (2013-2015): Targeted Nutrition and Livelihood Support for Vulnerable People Impacted by Floods and Drought Final Evaluation Report January 2016 Prepared by: Nyasha Tirivayi, Team Leader; Ben Murphy, Evaluator; Amadou Gaye, Evaluator Commissioned by the WFP Office of Evaluation Report number: OE/2015/012 Acknowledgements JaRco Consulting and the Evaluation Team would like to sincerely thank all those that have assisted in this evaluation: from WFP’s Country Office in The Gambia, its Office of Evaluation in Rome, and the West Africa Regional Bureau in Senegal, to the many participants from the Government of the The Gambia, other UN Agencies, NGO partners, and the numerous community member, who took the time to offer their perspectives to the Evaluation Team. Whilst it is not possible to name all contributors, special thanks are reserved for Vitoria Ginja, Mustapha Jammeh, Francis Abanzi, Annet Birungi and Grace Igweta for supporting the preparation phase, facilitating the evaluation mission, and reviewing early drafts of this report. Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the independent Evaluation Team and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Population & Demography / Employment Status by District
    Population & Demography / Employment Status by District Table 39.1: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years) by Employment Status and District - Total District Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Banjul 53.6 95.8 4.2 46.4 Kanifing 47.8 95.8 4.2 52.2 Kombo North 49.7 95.7 4.3 50.3 Kombo South 60.8 97.4 2.6 39.2 Kombo Central 52.7 94.7 5.3 47.3 Kombo East 55.2 97.0 3.0 44.8 Foni Brefet 80.6 99.8 0.2 19.4 Foni Bintang 81.7 99.7 0.3 18.3 Foni Kansalla 80.2 100.0 0.0 19.8 Foni Bundali 84.1 100.0 0.0 15.9 Foni Jarrol 76.0 99.3 0.7 24.0 Kiang West 73.7 99.6 0.4 26.3 Kiang Cental 80.3 99.2 0.8 19.7 Kiang East 83.5 100.0 0.0 16.5 Jarra West 76.3 99.7 0.3 23.7 Jarra Central 93.0 99.8 0.2 7.0 Jarra East 89.1 100.0 0.0 10.9 Lower Niumi 68.5 98.3 1.7 31.5 Upper Niumi 87.4 100.0 0.0 12.6 Jokadu 89.8 99.9 0.1 10.2 Lower Badibu 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Central Badibu 89.1 99.9 0.1 10.9 Illiasa 72.4 98.3 1.7 27.6 Sabach Sanjal 93.6 99.9 0.1 6.4 Lower Saloum 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Upper Saloum 97.6 100.0 0.0 2.4 Nianija 95.8 100.0 0.0 4.2 Niani 85.8 99.6 0.4 14.2 Sami 90.7 99.9 0.1 9.3 Niamina Dankunku 90.6 100.0 0.0 9.4 Niamina West 88.9 99.9 0.1 11.1 Niamina East 89.5 99.8 0.2 10.5 Lower Fuladu West 87.1 99.8 0.2 12.9 Upper Fuladu West 81.5 99.3 0.7 18.5 Janjanbureh 63.8 99.3 0.7 36.2 Jimara 85.1 99.9 0.1 14.9 Basse 73.1 100.0 0.0 26.9 Tumana 90.4 100.0 0.0 9.6 Kantora 93.5 99.9 0.1 6.5 Wuli West 96.6 99.9 0.1 3.4 Wuli East 97.2 100.0 0.0 2.8 Sandu 96.8 100.0 0.0 3.2 Source: IHS 2015/2016 Table 39.2: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years)
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Assistance to the Gambia Oar/Banjul June
    U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA OAR/BANJUL JUNE, IM2 U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA United States assistance to The Gambia prior to its independence was fairly limited. in the period 1946 through 1961, some $300,000 was provided to the country through the Erit,14sh Foreign Office. From 1962 through 1975 bilateral assistance was extended through food aid (totalling $5.3 million), technical assistance (totalling $l.14million), and the Peace Corps ($2.0 million), for a grand total of $8.4 million. 5However, indirect economic assistance was provided contribution to various African regional and worldwide programs such as the West African Measles-Smallpox Campaigns. funded through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the mid-1960s. The Gambia began to receive more direct U.S. Government assistance starting in 1973-74 as the great Sahelian drought wreaked havoc across West Africa. Even though it is a riverine country, 'The Gambia is entirelu within the Sahelian climatic zone. During the drought, its cash crop and food crop production trailed off and environmental degradation set in. The U.S. Government attempted to help alleviate the situation by providing a significant increase in food aid. Food assistance has continued since then and is presently running at some $600 ,000 and $800,000 a year (excluding freight charges) which is in addition to periodic emergency food shipments in response to famine conditions, e.g., 1978 and again in 1980 and 1981. In 1974, AID received permr'ission from the Government of The Gamnbia (GOTO) to assign an Economic Development Oficer in The Gambia and establish an office in Banjul, which reported to the Regional Develop­ ment Office in Dakar.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in the Gambia
    Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in the Gambia Results of the Application of the Land Governance Assessment Framework Synthesis Report August 2013 AMIE BENSOUDA & CO LP OFF BERTIL HARDING HIGHWAY NO. SSHFC CRESCENT KANIFING INSTITUTIONAL AREA KANIFING MUNICIPALITY E-mail: [email protected] Telephone Nos. 4495381 / 4496453 ACRONYMS DLS - Department of Lands and Surveys DPPH - Department of Physical Planning and Housing KMA - Kanifing Municipal Area KMC - Kanifing Municipal Council LGAF - Land Governance Assessment Framework MOL - Minister of Lands MOA - Minister of Agriculture MOFE - Minister of Forestry and the Environment MoLRG - Ministry of Lands and Regional Government NGO - Non- Governmental Organizations TDA - Tourism Development Area 2 2 Page Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. LGAF Methodology 5 3. Overview of Land Policy Issues in the Gambia 6 3.1 The Gambia: Background Information 6 3.1.1 Economy and geography 6 3.1.2 Governance system 7 3.2 Land Issues and Land Policy 7 3.2.1 Tenure Typology 7 3.2.2 History and current status of land policies 8 3.2.3 Land management institutions 9 4. Assessment of Land Governance in the Gambia 9 4.1 Legal and institutional framework 9 4.1.1 Continuum of rights 9 4.1.2 Enforcement of rights 11 4.1.3 Mechanisms for recognition of rights 12 4.1.4 Restrictions on rights 13 4.1.5 Clarity of institutional mandates 13 4.1.6 Equity and nondiscrimination 14 4.2 Land use planning, taxation, and management 14 4.2.1 Transparency of restrictions 14 4.2.2 Efficiency in the planning
    [Show full text]