DOCSLIB.ORG

Population & Demography / Employment Status by District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Population & Demography / Employment Status by District Table 39.1: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years) by Employment Status and District - Total District Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Banjul 53.6 95.8 4.2 46.4 Kanifing 47.8 95.8 4.2 52.2 Kombo North 49.7 95.7 4.3 50.3 Kombo South 60.8 97.4 2.6 39.2 Kombo Central 52.7 94.7 5.3 47.3 Kombo East 55.2 97.0 3.0 44.8 Foni Brefet 80.6 99.8 0.2 19.4 Foni Bintang 81.7 99.7 0.3 18.3 Foni Kansalla 80.2 100.0 0.0 19.8 Foni Bundali 84.1 100.0 0.0 15.9 Foni Jarrol 76.0 99.3 0.7 24.0 Kiang West 73.7 99.6 0.4 26.3 Kiang Cental 80.3 99.2 0.8 19.7 Kiang East 83.5 100.0 0.0 16.5 Jarra West 76.3 99.7 0.3 23.7 Jarra Central 93.0 99.8 0.2 7.0 Jarra East 89.1 100.0 0.0 10.9 Lower Niumi 68.5 98.3 1.7 31.5 Upper Niumi 87.4 100.0 0.0 12.6 Jokadu 89.8 99.9 0.1 10.2 Lower Badibu 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Central Badibu 89.1 99.9 0.1 10.9 Illiasa 72.4 98.3 1.7 27.6 Sabach Sanjal 93.6 99.9 0.1 6.4 Lower Saloum 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Upper Saloum 97.6 100.0 0.0 2.4 Nianija 95.8 100.0 0.0 4.2 Niani 85.8 99.6 0.4 14.2 Sami 90.7 99.9 0.1 9.3 Niamina Dankunku 90.6 100.0 0.0 9.4 Niamina West 88.9 99.9 0.1 11.1 Niamina East 89.5 99.8 0.2 10.5 Lower Fuladu West 87.1 99.8 0.2 12.9 Upper Fuladu West 81.5 99.3 0.7 18.5 Janjanbureh 63.8 99.3 0.7 36.2 Jimara 85.1 99.9 0.1 14.9 Basse 73.1 100.0 0.0 26.9 Tumana 90.4 100.0 0.0 9.6 Kantora 93.5 99.9 0.1 6.5 Wuli West 96.6 99.9 0.1 3.4 Wuli East 97.2 100.0 0.0 2.8 Sandu 96.8 100.0 0.0 3.2 Source: IHS 2015/2016 Table 39.2: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years) by Employment Status and District - Male District Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Banjul 65.0 96.4 0.0 35.0 Kanifing 68.2 96.0 0.0 31.8 Kombo North 69.8 95.2 0.0 30.2 Kombo South 74.5 95.9 0.0 25.5 Kombo Central 63.4 92.9 0.1 36.6 Kombo East 65.8 96.1 0.0 34.2 Foni Brefet 84.3 99.7 0.0 15.6 District Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Foni Bintang 85.7 99.7 0.0 14.3 Foni Kansalla 88.1 100.0 0.0 11.9 Foni Bundali 86.6 100.0 0.0 13.4 Foni Jarrol 82.3 99.6 0.0 17.7 Kiang West 77.2 100.0 0.0 22.8 Kiang Cental 86.2 98.5 0.0 13.8 Kiang East 86.9 100.0 0.0 13.1 Jarra West 87.8 99.8 0.0 12.2 Jarra Central 95.5 100.0 0.0 4.5 Jarra East 94.8 100.0 0.0 5.2 Lower Niumi 75.1 98.2 0.0 24.9 Upper Niumi 88.5 100.0 0.0 11.5 Jokadu 92.1 99.8 0.0 7.9 Lower Badibu 92.1 99.6 0.0 7.9 Central Badibu 93.4 100.0 0.0 6.5 Illiasa 86.0 97.6 0.0 14.0 Sabach Sanjal 95.1 99.7 0.0 4.9 Lower Saloum 93.8 100.0 0.0 6.2 Upper Saloum 98.7 100.0 0.0 1.3 Nianija 97.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 Niani 87.9 99.2 0.0 12.1 Sami 92.2 99.8 0.0 7.8 Niamina Dankunku 94.4 100.0 0.0 5.6 Niamina West 91.8 100.0 0.0 8.2 Niamina East 92.5 100.0 0.0 7.6 Lower Fuladu West 89.9 99.9 0.0 10.1 Upper Fuladu West 87.7 99.1 0.0 12.3 Janjanbureh 69.7 98.5 0.0 30.4 Jimara 86.2 100.0 0.0 13.8 Basse 90.1 100.0 0.0 9.9 Tumana 91.0 100.0 0.0 9.0 Kantora 94.7 99.7 0.0 5.3 Wuli West 98.4 99.9 0.0 1.6 Wuli East 98.0 100.0 0.0 2.0 Sandu 97.8 100.0 0.0 2.2 Source: IHS 2015/2016 Table 39.3: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years) by Employment Status and District -Female Distract Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Banjul 41.3 94.6 5.4 58.7 Kanifing 31.3 95.5 4.5 68.7 Kombo North 31.9 96.5 3.5 68.1 Kombo South 48.4 99.4 0.6 51.6 Kombo Central 42.6 97.1 2.9 57.4 Kombo East 46.0 98.1 1.9 54.0 Foni Brefet 77.3 100.0 0.0 22.7 Foni Bintang 78.5 99.6 0.4 21.5 Foni Kansalla 74.1 100.0 0.0 25.9 Foni Bundali 81.6 100.0 0.0 18.4 Foni Jarrol 71.6 99.0 1.0 28.4 Kiang West 71.4 99.4 0.6 28.6 Kiang Cental 76.1 99.6 0.4 23.9 Kiang East 81.1 100.0 0.0 18.9 Jarra West 67.7 99.5 0.5 32.3 Jarra Central 91.0 99.7 0.3 9.0 Jarra East 85.0 100.0 0.0 15.0 Lower Niumi 63.1 98.5 1.5 36.9 Upper Niumi 86.6 100.0 0.0 13.4 Jokadu 88.0 100.0 0.0 12.0 Distract Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Lower Badibu 86.3 99.7 0.3 13.7 Central Badibu 86.0 99.8 0.2 14.0 Illiasa 61.9 99.1 0.9 38.1 Sabach Sanjal 92.4 100.0 0.0 7.6 Lower Saloum 85.1 99.4 0.6 14.9 Upper Saloum 96.9 100.0 0.0 3.1 Nianija 94.8 100.0 0.0 5.2 Niani 84.1 99.8 0.2 15.9 Sami 89.5 100.0 0.0 10.5 Niamina Dankunku 87.6 100.0 0.0 12.4 Niamina West 86.6 99.8 0.2 13.4 Niamina East 87.4 99.7 0.3 12.6 Lower Fuladu West 85.0 99.7 0.3 15.0 Upper Fuladu West 76.7 99.5 0.5 23.3 Janjanbureh 58.7 100.0 0.0 41.3 Jimara 84.2 99.9 0.1 15.8 Basse 58.0 100.0 0.0 42.0 Tumana 90.0 100.0 0.0 10.0 Kantora 92.7 100.0 0.0 7.3 Wuli West 95.3 100.0 0.0 4.7 Wuli East 96.6 100.0 0.0 3.4 Sandu 96.1 100.0 0.0 3.9 Source: IHS 2015/2016.
Recommended publications
  • Gambia Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2017

    Gambia Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2017

    EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION FINAL REPORT The GAMBIA National Assembly Elections 6 April 2017 European Union Election Observation Missions are independent from the European Union institutions.The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. EU Election Observation Mission to The Gambia 2017 Final Report National Assembly Elections – 6 April 2017 Page 1 of 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 4 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 9 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 9 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM ................................................................................. 11 A. Universal and Regional Principles and Commitments ............................................................................. 11 B. Electoral Legislation ...............................................................................................................................
  • Review of the State of Implementation of Praia Orientations (On Land Tenure) in the Gambia

    Review of the State of Implementation of Praia Orientations (On Land Tenure) in the Gambia

    1 THE REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA REVIEW OF THE STATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PRAIA ORIENTATIONS (ON LAND TENURE) IN THE GAMBIA 2 REVIEW OF THE STATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PRAIA ORIENTATIONS (ON LAND TENURE) IN THE GAMBIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1. Context and Justification ..................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................... 4 1.1.4 Terms of Reference for the Study ........................................................................ 5 1.2 Country Profile............................................................................................................ 6 1.2.1 Physical Characteristics........................................................................................ 6 1.2.2 Political Characteristics........................................................................................ 6 1.2.3 Social Characteristics............................................................................................ 6 2 MAIN LAND USE SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................
  • Community Forestry Conflict Management in Central River Division, the Gambia

    Community Forestry Conflict Management in Central River Division, the Gambia

    CASE STUDY 2 Who owns Kayai Island? Community forestry conflict management in Central River division, the Gambia By A. Dampha, K. Camara, A. Jarjusey, M. Badjan and K. Jammeh, Forestry Department, the Gambia and National Consultancy for Forestry Extension and Training Services (NACO) Edited by A.P. Castro SUMMARY Kayai and Saruja villages are located on opposite sides of the River Gambia. Between them is Kayai Island, whose 784 ha consists mainly of forest reserve containing economically valuable species and a large wildlife population.The people of Kayai village regard the island as falling within their traditional lands. In the 1950s, the colonial government, without consulting Kayai village, gave farm plots on the island to people in Saruja as compensation for land annexed by an agricultural project. Since then, several disputes have arisen between the two villages over ownership of the island. Attempts to resolve the conflict, including though court adjudication, proved unsuccessful. The latest clash was provoked by the government’s recent participatory forestry initiative, which empowers communities to manage forest lands. This decentralization of public forestry administration seeks to foster sustainable natural resource management, addressing shortcomings in the State forestry that has been in operation since colonial times. A proposal by Kayai village to set up a community forest on the island met with resistance from Saruja villagers, who refused to sign the agreement approving it. The people of Saruja feared losing their rice fields, gardens and orchards and their access to forest products. As in the past, public and forestry officials’ efforts to resolve the conflict were not successful.
  • TEKKI FII GRANT FLYER.Cdr

    TEKKI FII GRANT FLYER.Cdr

    ACCESS TO FINANCE MINI GRANT. ABOUT THE TEKKI FII MINI-GRANT Powered by YEP, GIZ and IMVF Grants up to D50,000 to facilitate acquisition Grants are disbursed either as cash or as No collateral, interest rate or of equipment, materials, licenses and other assets, but asset disbursements will be repayment requirements. business critical inputs and assets. given priority where feasible. Grantees receive financial literacy training to improve their Grantees participate in annual experience sharing events to capacity to save, exercise financial planning and separate their communicate results, success stories and best practices of the private funds from the funds of the business. mini-grant scheme. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Must be a Gambian youth between Must provide a solid business plan Must have some level of savings or commit 18 -35 years using the application form to making regular savings in a financial template. service provider of his or her choice. Must have received entrepreneurship Must provide a guarantor before funds are disbursed to indicate that the grant will be or vocational training. Proof of used for the intended purpose. Failure of doing so implies that the amount of the grant attendance is required. will be refunded in full by the guarantor. Business must be registered by Business plan that shows high level of the time funds are disbursed. innovation will be an advantage. How To Apply? pplication forms are available online on the www.naccug.com | www.tekkifii.gm ou can find it here: www.yep.gm/opportunity/minigrantscheme orms should be filled electronically, printed, signed, scanned and sent by email to [email protected].
  • Kanifing Municipal Council (KMC)

    Kanifing Municipal Council (KMC)

    Kanifing Municipal Council (KMC) Foreword by the Lord Mayor This is the first Strategic Plan for Kanifing Municipal Council (KMC) covering the period 2016- 2020 and builds on its experience, achievements, lessons learnt from its operations over the past years and contributions of stakeholders (KMC staff, Ward Councillors, communities and key public and private sector stakeholders, NGOs and diplomatic missions) as revealed during the strategic consultations prior to generating this plan.. The development of this strategic plan is a clear manifestation of the commitment and drive of the KMC to providing the conducive environment for unparalleled livelihood and development of the municipality, including putting in place the appropriate tools to enable effective execution of its mandate. Thus the KMC’s vision ‘A modern Municipal city with a high standard of living for all its people’ and mission ‘To transform Kanifing Municipal Council into an effective, efficient and responsive Local Government Authority that provides a well- balanced standard of living for all through the provision of quality services facilitated by a well-trained and motivated personnel, requisite technology and the active participation/involvement of all stakeholders’, set a clear destination and business areas that the KMC will focus on in the next five years to enable the achievement of its vision. Its mission has been further collapsed into strategic pillars, goals, objectives and strategic activities. The end of the strategic plan period 2020 coincides with that of the national development blueprint Vision 2020 and it is hoped that by that time, the Council would have been significantly transformed. Although the local government elections will be held a year after the commencement of this strategic plan, it will also provide an opportunity for orientation of new Councillors for effectiveness and sustainability.
  • An Application of Small Area Estimation

    An Application of Small Area Estimation

    Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE Public Disclosure Authorized MAP IN THE GAMBIA An Application of Small Area Estimation Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE MAP IN THE GAMBIA November 2018 1 | Page This publication is prepared with the support of the Country Management Unit West Africa Poverty Monitoring Code (WAPMC - P164474). Extracts may be published if source is duly acknowledged. Copyright © 2018 by The Gambia Bureau of Statistics The Statistician General P. O. Box 3504, Serekunda, The Gambia Tel. +220 4377847 Fax: +220 4377848 Authors Rose Mungai Minh Cong Nguyen Tejesh Pradhan Supervisor Andrew Dabalen Graphic presentation of the data Minh Cong Nguyen Editor Lauri Scherer Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 The Gambia country context ...................................................................................................... 8 2. Overview of the Methodology ..............................................................................................
  • Report of GARD Consultancy Study of Water-Controlled Rice Production

    Report of GARD Consultancy Study of Water-Controlled Rice Production

    Report of GARD Consultancy Study of Water-Controlled Rice Production in The Gambia Christine Elias July, 1987 STUDY OF WATER-CONTROLLED RICE PRODUCTION IN THE GAMBIA by Christine Elias In collaboration with Soil and Water Management Unit GTZ/DWR Rainfed Rice Improvement Project Freedom From Hunger Campaign Jahaly-Pacharr Project July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements i Executive Summary ii 1. RATIONALE FOR STUDY 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 2 2.1 Soil and Water Management Unit (SWMU) 2 2.2 GTZ/DWR Rainfed Rice Improvement 7 2.3 Freedom From Hunger Campaign (FFHC) 10 2.4 Jahaly-Pacharr Tidal Irrigation Component 15 3. STUDY METHODOLOGY 22 4. CASE STUDY VILLAGES 24 5. FACTORS AFFECTING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND OUTCOME IN CASE-STUDY VILLAGES 27 5.1 SWI1U Case Study Villages 27 5.2 GTZ/DWR Case Study Villages 31 5.3 FFHC Case Study Village 35 5.4 Jahaly-Pacharr C:.se Study Village 36 6. ECONOMIC ANALYSES 37 6.1 Estimation of Project Costs 38 6.2 Estimation of Project Benefits and Incremental Costs of Rice Production 42 6.3 Project Returns and Sensitivity Analysis 44 6.4 Results of the Economic Analyses 45 7. COLLECTIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCES 50 7.1 Environmental Factors 51 7.2 Design Factors of Water-control Interventions 52 7.3 Issues of Land Use and Land Tenure 55 7.4 Village Participation 57 7.5 Compatibility of Intervention with Existing Farming System 58 7.6 Economic Factors 60 8. IMPLICATIONS FOR RICE DEVELOPMENT IN THE GAMBIA 60 9. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO THIS STUDY 63 ANNEXES A.
  • Emergency Operation in April to Provide Emergency Food Assistance to 62,500 People in the Five Most-Affected Districts

    Emergency Operation in April to Provide Emergency Food Assistance to 62,500 People in the Five Most-Affected Districts

    1 EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE FOR DROUGHT-AFFECTED POPULATIONS IN THE GAMBIA Number of beneficiaries 206,000 Duration of project 5 months (June – October 2012) WFP food tonnage 13,169 mt Cost (United States dollars) WFP food cost US$6,910,868 Total cost to WFP US$10,778,577 A severe drought has led to a substantial crop failure in most of the Gambia. A joint post-harvest assessment led by the Ministry of Agriculture and WFP indicates that 520,000 people living in rural districts are seriously affected and need emergency food assistance or livelihoods support. Drought-affected populations face both reduced food availability due to their own production being less and reduced food access due to the loss of income from failed groundnut crops and high food prices. The Government declared a national food and seed emergency in March 2012 and requested urgent humanitarian assistance. The United Nations Country Team has already mobilized US$4.8 million through the United Nations Central Emergency Response Fund, for priority interventions including food security and nutrition, water and health. As an initial response, WFP launched a two-month immediate-response emergency operation in April to provide emergency food assistance to 62,500 people in the five most-affected districts. This five-month emergency operation will enable WFP to provide food assistance to 206,000 people in the 19 most-affected districts during the lean season, with the aim to prevent increased food insecurity. To prevent any further deterioration of the nutrition situation, WFP also will also target 17,000 children in regions with a high prevalence of acute malnutrition.
  • U.S. Assistance to the Gambia Oar/Banjul June

    U.S. Assistance to the Gambia Oar/Banjul June

    U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA OAR/BANJUL JUNE, IM2 U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA United States assistance to The Gambia prior to its independence was fairly limited. in the period 1946 through 1961, some $300,000 was provided to the country through the Erit,14sh Foreign Office. From 1962 through 1975 bilateral assistance was extended through food aid (totalling $5.3 million), technical assistance (totalling $l.14million), and the Peace Corps ($2.0 million), for a grand total of $8.4 million. 5However, indirect economic assistance was provided contribution to various African regional and worldwide programs such as the West African Measles-Smallpox Campaigns. funded through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the mid-1960s. The Gambia began to receive more direct U.S. Government assistance starting in 1973-74 as the great Sahelian drought wreaked havoc across West Africa. Even though it is a riverine country, 'The Gambia is entirelu within the Sahelian climatic zone. During the drought, its cash crop and food crop production trailed off and environmental degradation set in. The U.S. Government attempted to help alleviate the situation by providing a significant increase in food aid. Food assistance has continued since then and is presently running at some $600 ,000 and $800,000 a year (excluding freight charges) which is in addition to periodic emergency food shipments in response to famine conditions, e.g., 1978 and again in 1980 and 1981. In 1974, AID received permr'ission from the Government of The Gamnbia (GOTO) to assign an Economic Development Oficer in The Gambia and establish an office in Banjul, which reported to the Regional Develop­ ment Office in Dakar.
  • Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in the Gambia

    Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in the Gambia

    Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in the Gambia Results of the Application of the Land Governance Assessment Framework Synthesis Report August 2013 AMIE BENSOUDA & CO LP OFF BERTIL HARDING HIGHWAY NO. SSHFC CRESCENT KANIFING INSTITUTIONAL AREA KANIFING MUNICIPALITY E-mail: [email protected] Telephone Nos. 4495381 / 4496453 ACRONYMS DLS - Department of Lands and Surveys DPPH - Department of Physical Planning and Housing KMA - Kanifing Municipal Area KMC - Kanifing Municipal Council LGAF - Land Governance Assessment Framework MOL - Minister of Lands MOA - Minister of Agriculture MOFE - Minister of Forestry and the Environment MoLRG - Ministry of Lands and Regional Government NGO - Non- Governmental Organizations TDA - Tourism Development Area 2 2 Page Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. LGAF Methodology 5 3. Overview of Land Policy Issues in the Gambia 6 3.1 The Gambia: Background Information 6 3.1.1 Economy and geography 6 3.1.2 Governance system 7 3.2 Land Issues and Land Policy 7 3.2.1 Tenure Typology 7 3.2.2 History and current status of land policies 8 3.2.3 Land management institutions 9 4. Assessment of Land Governance in the Gambia 9 4.1 Legal and institutional framework 9 4.1.1 Continuum of rights 9 4.1.2 Enforcement of rights 11 4.1.3 Mechanisms for recognition of rights 12 4.1.4 Restrictions on rights 13 4.1.5 Clarity of institutional mandates 13 4.1.6 Equity and nondiscrimination 14 4.2 Land use planning, taxation, and management 14 4.2.1 Transparency of restrictions 14 4.2.2 Efficiency in the planning
  • Press Release

    Press Release

    GAMCOTRAP The Gambia Committee on Traditional Practices affecting The Health of Women and Children (GAMCOTRAP) Protect the Girl Child IAC - CIAF Press Release UN Women Partners with GAMCOTRAP in the Campaign to end FGM in Lower and Central Baddibu districts of the Gambia L-R: Governor Lamin Queen Jammeh speaking opening ceremony at Kerewan and group picture of participants GAMCOTRAP has launched a two-year project with two hundred community leaders in Lower and Central districts of the North Bank Region of the Gambia. The project which is funded by the United Nations Trust Fund to end Violence Against Women (UN Women) seeks to empower communities to end FGM and promote the rights of women and girl-children. As a result community leaders and members of the Council of Elders from both districts participated in a series of workshops held in Kinteh Kunda, Njaba Kunda and Kerewan respectively. During a three day training workshops participants were sensitized about the project.. In his launching statement, the Governor of North Bank Region, Lamin Queen Jammeh, thanked and welcomed GAMCOTRAP for the initiative in his region and noted that traditional practices are strongly held in Lower and Central Baddibu but urged participants to reflect on the process of human development and the need for attitudinal change. He observed that to change attitudes there is need for modesty in order to gain knowledge and make informed decisions. He urged the participants to learn and share the information they gain from this project. Governor Jammeh appreciated GAMCOTRAP’s approach of working through local structures, while working with opinion leaders which he observed is in the right direction in order to reach success.
  • The 2015/16 Gambia Integrated Household Survey Vol III

    The 2015/16 Gambia Integrated Household Survey Vol III

    THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GAMBIA INTEGRATED HOUSEHOLD SURVEY 2015/16 Volume III Prevalence and Depth of Poverty Gambia Bureau of Statistics Banjul, The Gambia October 2017 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. iii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ANNEXES.............................................................................................................................. iv ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS............................................................................................... v FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 - BACKGROUND, SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION ................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Socio-economic Environment ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Objectives of the Integrated