DOCSLIB.ORG

Education / Gross Enrolment Rate (GER)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Education / Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) Education / Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) Table 123.1: LBE, Historical Trend - Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) - BOYS Region / District (Pop. Census 2003) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Banjul 110 105 111 111 125 126 137 137 Kanifing 108 109 110 107 108 110 110 114 Foni Bintang 90.9 88.2 91.8 94.2 100 106 100 99.8 Foni Bondali 85.9 75.9 85.5 77.8 83.6 87.0 92.2 97.0 Foni Brefet 121 120 116 140 116 118 106 109 Foni Jarrol 92.7 87.7 77.5 72.6 103 104 98.2 103 Foni Kansalla 112 97.0 105 127 109 110 112 114 Kombo Central 98.1 96.0 109 112 113 118 117 121 Kombo East 94.1 97.6 94.5 110 120 115 119 119 Kombo North 81.3 79.7 82.7 84.5 92.7 96.9 99.7 105 Kombo South 107 107 112 122 125 134 134 135 Central Badibou 92.8 92.4 98.2 98.9 118 126 126 138 Jokadu 77.4 76.1 79.7 81.7 88.7 88.4 99.6 97.8 Lower Badibou 96.6 100 124 131 127 140 155 155 Lower Niumi 99.3 100 94.0 96.0 103 106 106 109 Upper Badibou 73.9 70.7 77.5 80.0 91.4 110 118 120 Upper Niumi 76.9 78.0 80.0 80.2 79.1 83.1 83.9 89.3 Jarra Central 71.5 68.2 70.4 103 101 107 115 143 Jarra East 73.8 68.9 67.0 76.0 77.1 76.1 71.6 74.0 Jarra West 97.6 91.6 92.8 95.8 92.7 92.2 98.1 103 Kiang Central 127 104 103 109 109 109 103 110 Kiang East 98.4 92.1 93.0 104 98.8 98.4 102 107 Kiang West 138 116 121 116 116 114 115 115 Fulladu West 52.2 49.7 52.1 56.0 58.4 60.0 63.5 64.7 Janjanbureh 103 101 120 116 108 107 95.7 105 Lower Saloum 56.4 55.2 56.8 54.7 60.5 60.8 68.7 77.5 Niamina Dankunku 85.6 62.0 68.5 60.9 66.8 62.1 75.5 100 Niamina East 45.3 40.3 39.2 43.2 45.1 48.4 53.5 62.4 Niamina West 71.7 59.6 69.4 63.1 69.1 74.9 88.4 83.2 Niani 56.4 56.8 64.3 64.7 70.3 73.6 72.6 75.0 Nianija 32.4 26.0 26.0 30.1 31.1 31.3 39.8 39.3 Sami 61.0 59.9 59.5 55.4 56.8 55.8 61.9 66.7 Upper Saloum 29.1 27.1 26.3 30.0 29.0 31.4 35.1 37.8 Fulladu East 82.1 77.5 83.8 88.9 93.7 98.1 103 110 Kantora 86.8 85.0 86.0 89.9 93.0 99.4 114 121 Sandu 62.8 62.9 73.1 68.5 77.1 76.1 83.3 94.2 Wuli 83.9 84.1 83.9 92.0 92.2 97.8 97.4 103 Total 87.5 85.6 89.1 91.7 95.4 99.0 101 105 Source: MOBSE, Education Statistics 2016/2017 Table 123.2: LBE, Historical Trend - Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) - GIRLS Region / District (Pop. Census 2003) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Banjul 98.5 97.0 101 105 121 122 135 134 Kanifing 107 106 109 106 108 112 115 116 Foni Bintang 94.8 95.9 97.4 91.2 96.7 100 101 98.9 Foni Bondali 93.0 80.4 85.8 86.2 92.0 93.8 104 107 Foni Brefet 122 125 116 146 128 122 119 123 Foni Jarrol 93.9 90.0 83.2 86.1 112 115 117 112 Foni Kansalla 121 108 119 141 124 126 125 126 Kombo Central 95.5 93.8 107 110 111 119 121 126 Kombo East 90.7 91.5 94.1 109 123 119 120 124 Kombo North 80.2 81.3 81.3 84.4 94.0 100 102 111 Kombo South 105 109 111 122 130 139 140 145 Region / District (Pop. Census 2003) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Central Badibou 90.2 91.6 99.9 111 126 141 135 149 Jokadu 76.1 70.5 73.6 77.4 85.6 90.4 92.8 91.6 Lower Badibou 96.2 97.4 120 129 131 146 155 172 Lower Niumi 99.9 98.7 93.3 96.7 100 107 109 115 Upper Badibou 78.1 77.8 81.7 83.7 99.7 111 124 126 Upper Niumi 90.2 90.2 91.2 88.0 91.5 92.0 100 105 Jarra Central 85.0 81.7 87.0 110 107 106 110 131 Jarra East 88.1 79.7 80.5 94.7 95.4 96.6 96.2 100 Jarra West 100 94.6 103 108 104 106 107 115 Kiang Central 119 105 102 115 113 117 116 115 Kiang East 114 117 121 121 118 121 130 124 Kiang West 135 109 116 112 110 111 106 104 Fulladu West 64.6 61.2 64.9 68.1 71.0 73.4 76.3 79.6 Janjanbureh 92.7 92.3 93.1 111 108 100 96.4 97.6 Lower Saloum 80.1 76.0 74.2 78.4 86.5 90.3 96.1 107 Niamina Dankunku 62.4 68.9 77.8 75.3 81.5 83.1 93.8 118 Niamina East 50.3 52.0 50.3 52.4 56.3 59.4 64.6 72.5 Niamina West 99.7 88.8 92.1 87.8 93.9 94.6 99.0 101 Niani 74.5 75.5 76.7 77.9 87.7 85.1 82.3 83.6 Nianija 51.9 43.1 43.1 53.0 49.0 52.1 66.3 66.2 Sami 76.5 68.2 71.0 67.1 69.8 69.1 74.0 77.7 Upper Saloum 48.9 43.6 44.8 48.2 46.7 54.1 54.3 56.8 Fulladu East 76.7 72.8 86.6 85.4 91.8 99.8 105 115 Kantora 76.2 71.0 80.5 80.1 82.9 85.1 97.7 106 Sandu 72.7 66.3 73.5 67.5 75.2 76.8 85.0 95.7 Wuli 78.9 73.0 81.3 89.7 92.2 97.5 98.0 109 Total - 89.1 87.3 91.4 93.9 98.7 104 107 112 Source: MOBSE, Education Statistics 2016/2017 Table 123.3: LBE, Historical Trend - Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) - TOTALS Region / District 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Banjul 104 101 106 108 123 124 136 135 Kanifing 107 107 109 107 108 111 112 115 Foni Bintang 92.7 91.8 94.4 92.8 98.6 103 101 99.3 Foni Bondali 89.2 78.0 85.6 81.7 87.5 90.2 97.9 102 Foni Brefet 122 122 116 143 122 120 112 116 Foni Jarrol 93.3 88.8 80.2 79.1 107 109 107 107 Foni Kansalla 116 102 111 133 116 118 118 120 Kombo Central 96.8 94.9 108 111 112 119 119 123 Kombo East 92.5 94.7 94.3 110 121 117 120 122 Kombo North 80.7 80.5 82.0 84.5 93.4 98.7 101 108 Kombo South 106 108 112 122 128 136 137 140 Central Badibou 91.6 92.0 99.0 104 122 133 130 143 Jokadu 76.7 73.4 76.7 79.6 87.2 89.4 96.3 94.8 Lower Badibou 96.5 98.8 122 130 129 143 155 163 Lower Niumi 99.6 99.4 93.6 96.4 102 107 108 112 Upper Badibou 76.0 74.2 79.6 81.8 95.5 110 121 123 Upper Niumi 82.9 83.5 85.1 83.8 84.7 87.1 91.3 96.5 Jarra Central 78.2 74.9 78.6 106 104 106 113 137 Jarra East 80.6 74.0 73.4 84.8 85.7 85.8 83.2 86.4 Jarra West 99.0 93.1 98.1 102 98.5 98.8 102 109 Kiang Central 123 105 103 112 111 113 109 113 Kiang East 106 104 106 112 107 109 115 115 Kiang West 137 112 119 114 113 112 110 109 Fulladu West 58.4 55.4 58.5 62.1 64.7 66.7 69.9 72.1 Janjanbureh 97.4 96.6 106 113 108 103 96.0 101 Lower Saloum 68.1 65.5 65.4 66.4 73.3 75.3 82.3 91.9 Niamina Dankunku 73.4 65.6 73.4 68.5 74.5 73.1 85.1 110 Niamina East 47.8 46.1 44.6 47.7 50.6 53.8 59.0 67.4 Region / District 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Niamina West 85.4 73.9 80.5 75.2 81.3 84.5 93.6 91.9 Niani 65.3 66.0 70.4 71.2 78.8 79.2 77.3 79.2 Nianija 42.0 34.5 34.5 41.5 40.0 41.6 52.9 52.7 Sami 68.8 64.1 65.3 61.3 63.4 62.5 68.0 72.2 Upper Saloum 39.0 35.4 35.6 39.1 37.9 42.7 44.7 47.3 Fulladu East 79.4 75.2 85.2 87.2 92.8 98.9 104 112 Kantora 81.7 78.1 83.4 85.2 88.1 92.4 106 113 Sandu 67.6 64.6 73.3 68.0 76.2 76.4 84.1 94.9 Wuli 81.5 78.6 82.6 90.8 92.2 97.6 97.7 106 Total 88.3 86.5 90.2 92.8 97.1 101 104 109 Source: MOBSE, Education Statistics 2016/2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gambia Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2017
    EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION FINAL REPORT The GAMBIA National Assembly Elections 6 April 2017 European Union Election Observation Missions are independent from the European Union institutions.The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. EU Election Observation Mission to The Gambia 2017 Final Report National Assembly Elections – 6 April 2017 Page 1 of 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 4 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 9 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 9 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM ................................................................................. 11 A. Universal and Regional Principles and Commitments ............................................................................. 11 B. Electoral Legislation ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Application of Small Area Estimation
    Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE Public Disclosure Authorized MAP IN THE GAMBIA An Application of Small Area Estimation Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized POVERTY AND INEQUALITY ON THE MAP IN THE GAMBIA November 2018 1 | Page This publication is prepared with the support of the Country Management Unit West Africa Poverty Monitoring Code (WAPMC - P164474). Extracts may be published if source is duly acknowledged. Copyright © 2018 by The Gambia Bureau of Statistics The Statistician General P. O. Box 3504, Serekunda, The Gambia Tel. +220 4377847 Fax: +220 4377848 Authors Rose Mungai Minh Cong Nguyen Tejesh Pradhan Supervisor Andrew Dabalen Graphic presentation of the data Minh Cong Nguyen Editor Lauri Scherer Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 The Gambia country context ...................................................................................................... 8 2. Overview of the Methodology ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of GARD Consultancy Study of Water-Controlled Rice Production
    Report of GARD Consultancy Study of Water-Controlled Rice Production in The Gambia Christine Elias July, 1987 STUDY OF WATER-CONTROLLED RICE PRODUCTION IN THE GAMBIA by Christine Elias In collaboration with Soil and Water Management Unit GTZ/DWR Rainfed Rice Improvement Project Freedom From Hunger Campaign Jahaly-Pacharr Project July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements i Executive Summary ii 1. RATIONALE FOR STUDY 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 2 2.1 Soil and Water Management Unit (SWMU) 2 2.2 GTZ/DWR Rainfed Rice Improvement 7 2.3 Freedom From Hunger Campaign (FFHC) 10 2.4 Jahaly-Pacharr Tidal Irrigation Component 15 3. STUDY METHODOLOGY 22 4. CASE STUDY VILLAGES 24 5. FACTORS AFFECTING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND OUTCOME IN CASE-STUDY VILLAGES 27 5.1 SWI1U Case Study Villages 27 5.2 GTZ/DWR Case Study Villages 31 5.3 FFHC Case Study Village 35 5.4 Jahaly-Pacharr C:.se Study Village 36 6. ECONOMIC ANALYSES 37 6.1 Estimation of Project Costs 38 6.2 Estimation of Project Benefits and Incremental Costs of Rice Production 42 6.3 Project Returns and Sensitivity Analysis 44 6.4 Results of the Economic Analyses 45 7. COLLECTIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCES 50 7.1 Environmental Factors 51 7.2 Design Factors of Water-control Interventions 52 7.3 Issues of Land Use and Land Tenure 55 7.4 Village Participation 57 7.5 Compatibility of Intervention with Existing Farming System 58 7.6 Economic Factors 60 8. IMPLICATIONS FOR RICE DEVELOPMENT IN THE GAMBIA 60 9. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO THIS STUDY 63 ANNEXES A.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOPE of WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road
    Reinforced Access of the most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio – economic Facilities through a Feeder Road Rehabilitation Programme ANNEX C – SCOPE OF WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road EUROPEAN UNION NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ‘Reinforced Access of the Most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio-economic Facilities through a Feeder Roads Rehabilitation Programme’ funded by the European Union Delegation and is being implemented by the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) in The Gambia. It aims to enhance socio-economic developments around road networks, provide employment, increase household income and thereby reduce poverty among vulnerable populations including female headed households and youth in rural Gambia. The rehabilitation of the feeder roads will be achieved through a combination of labour-based methods and machine-based methods. 10 feeder roads with a total of 104.4km have been identified for rehabilitation. The feeder roads are distributed across the North Bank Region, Central River Region and Upper River Region of the country. The selected roads are: • Road 1: Soto Masamba to Numuyel to Trunk Road (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 2: Chamoi to Dampha Kunda to Tamba Sansang (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 3: Alkali Kunda to North Bank Trunk Road (Upper Badibu, NBR), • Road 4: Suduwol to Nyamanari to Fatoto (Kantora, URR), • Road 5: Galleh Manda to South Bank Trunk Road (Fulladu West, CRR), • Road 6: Illiasa to Katchang (Upper Badibou, NBR), • Road 7: Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba (Tumana, URR), • Road 8: Fass to Kerr Jane (Lower Niumi, NBR). • Road 9: Baja Kunda to Boro Kanda Kasseh (Wulli, URR), • Road 10: Kerewan to Njawara (Lower Badibou, NBR) SCOPE OF WORKS This scope of works is for the rehabilitation of Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba road in Tumana and Kantora Districts, Upper River Region of The Gambia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia – Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200557
    Measuring results, sharing lessons sharing Measuring results, OPERATION EVALUATION The Gambia – Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200557 (2013-2015): Targeted Nutrition and Livelihood Support for Vulnerable People Impacted by Floods and Drought Final Evaluation Report January 2016 Prepared by: Nyasha Tirivayi, Team Leader; Ben Murphy, Evaluator; Amadou Gaye, Evaluator Commissioned by the WFP Office of Evaluation Report number: OE/2015/012 Acknowledgements JaRco Consulting and the Evaluation Team would like to sincerely thank all those that have assisted in this evaluation: from WFP’s Country Office in The Gambia, its Office of Evaluation in Rome, and the West Africa Regional Bureau in Senegal, to the many participants from the Government of the The Gambia, other UN Agencies, NGO partners, and the numerous community member, who took the time to offer their perspectives to the Evaluation Team. Whilst it is not possible to name all contributors, special thanks are reserved for Vitoria Ginja, Mustapha Jammeh, Francis Abanzi, Annet Birungi and Grace Igweta for supporting the preparation phase, facilitating the evaluation mission, and reviewing early drafts of this report. Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the independent Evaluation Team and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Population & Demography / Employment Status by District
    Population & Demography / Employment Status by District Table 39.1: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years) by Employment Status and District - Total District Active Employed Unemployed Inactive Banjul 53.6 95.8 4.2 46.4 Kanifing 47.8 95.8 4.2 52.2 Kombo North 49.7 95.7 4.3 50.3 Kombo South 60.8 97.4 2.6 39.2 Kombo Central 52.7 94.7 5.3 47.3 Kombo East 55.2 97.0 3.0 44.8 Foni Brefet 80.6 99.8 0.2 19.4 Foni Bintang 81.7 99.7 0.3 18.3 Foni Kansalla 80.2 100.0 0.0 19.8 Foni Bundali 84.1 100.0 0.0 15.9 Foni Jarrol 76.0 99.3 0.7 24.0 Kiang West 73.7 99.6 0.4 26.3 Kiang Cental 80.3 99.2 0.8 19.7 Kiang East 83.5 100.0 0.0 16.5 Jarra West 76.3 99.7 0.3 23.7 Jarra Central 93.0 99.8 0.2 7.0 Jarra East 89.1 100.0 0.0 10.9 Lower Niumi 68.5 98.3 1.7 31.5 Upper Niumi 87.4 100.0 0.0 12.6 Jokadu 89.8 99.9 0.1 10.2 Lower Badibu 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Central Badibu 89.1 99.9 0.1 10.9 Illiasa 72.4 98.3 1.7 27.6 Sabach Sanjal 93.6 99.9 0.1 6.4 Lower Saloum 88.8 99.7 0.3 11.2 Upper Saloum 97.6 100.0 0.0 2.4 Nianija 95.8 100.0 0.0 4.2 Niani 85.8 99.6 0.4 14.2 Sami 90.7 99.9 0.1 9.3 Niamina Dankunku 90.6 100.0 0.0 9.4 Niamina West 88.9 99.9 0.1 11.1 Niamina East 89.5 99.8 0.2 10.5 Lower Fuladu West 87.1 99.8 0.2 12.9 Upper Fuladu West 81.5 99.3 0.7 18.5 Janjanbureh 63.8 99.3 0.7 36.2 Jimara 85.1 99.9 0.1 14.9 Basse 73.1 100.0 0.0 26.9 Tumana 90.4 100.0 0.0 9.6 Kantora 93.5 99.9 0.1 6.5 Wuli West 96.6 99.9 0.1 3.4 Wuli East 97.2 100.0 0.0 2.8 Sandu 96.8 100.0 0.0 3.2 Source: IHS 2015/2016 Table 39.2: Percentage Distribution of Population (15-64 years)
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Assistance to the Gambia Oar/Banjul June
    U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA OAR/BANJUL JUNE, IM2 U.S. ASSISTANCE TO THE GAMBIA United States assistance to The Gambia prior to its independence was fairly limited. in the period 1946 through 1961, some $300,000 was provided to the country through the Erit,14sh Foreign Office. From 1962 through 1975 bilateral assistance was extended through food aid (totalling $5.3 million), technical assistance (totalling $l.14million), and the Peace Corps ($2.0 million), for a grand total of $8.4 million. 5However, indirect economic assistance was provided contribution to various African regional and worldwide programs such as the West African Measles-Smallpox Campaigns. funded through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the mid-1960s. The Gambia began to receive more direct U.S. Government assistance starting in 1973-74 as the great Sahelian drought wreaked havoc across West Africa. Even though it is a riverine country, 'The Gambia is entirelu within the Sahelian climatic zone. During the drought, its cash crop and food crop production trailed off and environmental degradation set in. The U.S. Government attempted to help alleviate the situation by providing a significant increase in food aid. Food assistance has continued since then and is presently running at some $600 ,000 and $800,000 a year (excluding freight charges) which is in addition to periodic emergency food shipments in response to famine conditions, e.g., 1978 and again in 1980 and 1981. In 1974, AID received permr'ission from the Government of The Gamnbia (GOTO) to assign an Economic Development Oficer in The Gambia and establish an office in Banjul, which reported to the Regional Develop­ ment Office in Dakar.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2015/16 Gambia Integrated Household Survey Vol III
    THE GOVERNMENT OF THE GAMBIA INTEGRATED HOUSEHOLD SURVEY 2015/16 Volume III Prevalence and Depth of Poverty Gambia Bureau of Statistics Banjul, The Gambia October 2017 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. iii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ANNEXES.............................................................................................................................. iv ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS............................................................................................... v FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 - BACKGROUND, SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION ................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Socio-economic Environment ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Objectives of the Integrated
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Land Sector Governance in the Gambia
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING LAND SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN THE GAMBIA Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation of the Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) Public Disclosure Authorized AMIE BENSOUDA & CO LP OFF BERTIL HARDING HIGHWAY NO. SSHFC CRESCENT KANIFING INSTITUTIONAL AREA Public Disclosure Authorized KANIFING MUNICIPALITY Email – [email protected] Telephone Nos. 4495381 / 4496453 AUGUST 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement 3 Acronyms 4 1. Executive Summary 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 LGAF Methodology 6 1.3 Overview of Land Policy Issues in the Gambia 7 1.4 Assessment of Land Governance in the Gambia 11 1.5 Policy Priorities 23 1.6 Conclusion 26 2. Consolidated Scorecard 27 3. Introduction 31 4. Methodology 32 4.1 Adapting the LGAF to the Country Situation 32 4.2 Government Engagement 32 4.3 Collection of Background Data and Panel Workshops 33 5. Context 34 5.1 Geographical Description 34 5.2 Historical Evolution 35 5.35.2 Key Social and Economic Indicators 35 5.4 Administrative Structure 37 5.5 Political System 37 5.6 Land Tenure System 39 5.6.1 Historical Context 39 5.6.2 Freehold Title 39 5.6.3 Leasehold 41 5.6.4 Deemed Lease 41 5.6.5 Customary Tenure 41 5.6.6 Forests Parks, Wild Life Reserves and Land Acquired for Public Purposes 42 5.6.7 Area and Population by Tenure Type 42 6. Tenure Typology 43 6.1 Institutional Map 49 6.2 Urban Planning 55 6.3 Three Growth Centres of Brikama, Farafenni and Basse 56 6.4 The Tourism Development Area (TDA) 56 6.5 Forestry 57 6.6 Current Situation 57 7.
    [Show full text]
  • MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7Th to 12Th April 2014
    80 OAU Boulevard, Banjul, The Gambia TEL: 4201535/4201537/3960636/9960633 Website: www.legalaid.gov.gm EMAIL: [email protected] MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7th to 12th April 2014 MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 2. Project Sensitization.........................................................................................................5 3. Implementation of the Mobile Legal Aid Clinic ............................................................5 A. Upper River Region ....................................................................................................5 I. Kantora District ................................................................................................5 II. Fuladu East, Basse District………………………………………………………………………..7 a) Basse Police Station………………….………………………………….……………..8 b) Mansanjang Kunda……...……………………………………………….9 III. Tumana District ..............................................................................................10 a) Chamoi…………………………….…………………………...……….10 b) Follow up with the Governor on issues raised………..…….….……….11 B. North Bank Region……………...………………………………………………………………12 I. Sabachsanjal District….……………..………..…………………………………………….12 a) Dibbakunda………………………………………………….……………13 b) Radio Program…………………………………..….…………………….……..13 II. Central Badibu District….………………………..….……………………………………..…14 a) Farafenni Police Station……………………………...……..………………………..……..15
    [Show full text]
  • Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in the Gambia
    Government of The Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in The Gambia September 2010 Acknowledgment The RJA Team thanks the Governor’s and Mayor’s Offices as well as the Regional Disaster Management Committees in the six regions for guiding the sub-teams during their field visits. The Team also thanks all the village and/or community members who took their time to speak to the Team and participated in the interviews and discussions. Acronyms BCC Banjul City Council CRR Central River Region EmOC Emergency Obstetric Care FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation GBOS Gambia Bureau of Statistics IDP Internally Displaced Person KMC Kanifing Municipal Council LRR Lower River Region NBR North Bank Region NDMA National Disaster Management Agency NERICA New Rice for Africa NFI Non-Food Item NGO Non-Governmental Organisation ORS Oral Rehydration Solution PHC Primary Health Centre RH Reproductive Health RJA Rapid Joint Assessment RDMC Regional Disaster Management Committee STI Sexually Transmitted Infection UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund URR Upper River Region VDC Village Development Committee WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation WR Western Region Cover photography: Flooded city centre of Basse (URR) 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Mobile Qos Report
    November 2016 MONTHLY MOBILE QOS REPORT Comparative Quality of Service Report for Mobile Networks Technical Report November 2017 1 November 2017 Contents 1. Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ............................................................................................. 4 3. KPIs & Threshold Used in Report ................................................................................................. 6 4. Findings 1: 2G Networks................................................................................................................. 7 5. Findings 2: Graphs .......................................................................................................................... 10 6. Findings 3: CELL Outages ............................................................................................................. 12 7. Findings 4: Percentage Change in Traffic ................................................................................ 12 7.1. Voice Traffic ................................................................................................................................. 12 7.2. Data Traffic ................................................................................................................................... 13 8. Number of Cells Deployed ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]