World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document SFG1735 Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Public Disclosure Authorized Revised Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for The Irrigation Restoration and Development Project Additional Financing (IRDP-AF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Draft January 24, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Coordination Unit Ministry of Energy and Water Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Table of Contents 02 Abbreviations and Acronyms 04 Executive Summary 05 I INTRODUCTION 08 1.1 Project Background 08 1.2 Need for ESMF 08 II AF PROJECT DESCRIPTION 09 2.1 AF Project Objective and Components 09 2.2AF Project Area 11 2.3AF Project Implementation Approach 11 III GOVERNMENT LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 11 3.1 Key National Laws and Regulations 11 3.2 International Conventions and Agreements 15 IV KEY SAFEGUARD ISSUES AND MITIGATION MEASURES 16 4.1 WB Safeguard Policies Triggered for the AF Project 16 4.2 Potential Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures 18 4.3 Incorporating ‘Lessons Learned’ on Safeguards Compliance 20 V ESMF OBJECTIVE AND PROCESS 22 5.1 Objective, Scope, and Approach 22 5.2 Safeguard Screening and WB Clearance 25 5.3 Safeguard Information Disclosure 27 5.4 Stakeholder Consultations 27 VI ESMF IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT 29 6.1 Institutional Responsibilities 29 6.2 Safeguard Training and Capacity Building 30 6.3 Monitoring and Evaluation 31 6.4 Grievance Redress Mechanism 32 6.5 Public Information and Communication 35 6.6 Indicative Budget for ESMF Compliance 36 VII ESMF CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE 37 ANNEXES 39 1 Screening and Checklist for Investment Schemes 39 (a) List of Attributes that Cannot be Affected by Eligible Investments 40 (b) Chance Find Procedures 41 (c) Public Announcement and Local Consultation 43 (d) Project Investments Screening Checklist 48 (e) Environment and Social Management Plan (ESMP) 53 (f) Pest Management Framework (PMF) 65 2 Environmental Code of Practice (ECOP) 72 (a) Environmental Codes of Practice (ECOP) 72 (b) Simplified ECOP 82 3 Procedures for Mine Risk Management 84 4 Sample Grievance Registration Form 89 5 Organization and Reporting (Project and Investment Levels) 89 6 Dam Safety Requirement for Dams 94 (a) Dam Safety Requirements for the Remedial Works of Existing Dams 94 (b) Dam Safety Requirements for the ESIA Study for New Dams 105 (c) Draft TOR for Dam Safety Panel (DSP) 110 7 (a) Draft TOR for Environment and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Study 122 (b) Draft TOR for Environment and Social Advisory Panel (ESAP) 147 8 Minutes from Consultations on ESMF and RPF 155 9 Project Area and List of Prospective Dam Sites 209 40 Abbreviations and Acronyms AAIP Afghanistan Agriculture Inputs IRDP Irrigation Restoration and Development Project project AF Additional Financing IRDP-AF Irrigation Restoration and Development project additional financing ANDMA Afghanistan National Disaster IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management Management Authority AP Affected Person RAP Resettlement Action Plan ARAZI Afghan Independent Land Authority RPF Resettlement Policy Framework ARTF Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust MACA Mine Action Center for Afghanistan Fund AWARD Afghanistan Water Resources MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Management Livestock CDC Community Development Council MAPA Mine Action Program of Afghanistan CoC Certificate of Compliance MEW Ministry of Energy and Water CSC Construction Supervision Consultant MRRD Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development DABS Da Afghanistan BreshnaSherkat MTR Mid-Term Review national electric utility DMC NDMC National Disaster Management Commission Disaster Risk Management Committee DRM Disaster Risk Management NRVA National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment DRR Disaster Risk Reduction NGOs Non Government Organizations DSR Dam Safety Report NEPA National Environmental Protection Agency DSP Dam Safety Panel OFWMP- On-Farm Water Management Project- AF additional financing ECOP Environment Codes of Practice OP/BP Operational Policy/Bank Procedure of the World Bank EIA Environmental Impact Assessment O&M Operation and Maintenance EHS Environmental Health and Safety PCU Program Coordination Unit EHSG Environmental Health and Safety PSS Project safeguard staff Guideline EMA External Monitoring Agency EMC Environmental Monitoring RAP Resettlement Action Plan Consultant EPP Emergency Preparedness Plan RBC River Basin Committee ESMF Environmental and Social RBOs River Basin Organizations Management Framework ESAP Environment and Social Advisory RPF Resettlement Policy Framework Panel ESMP Environmental and Social SCoLW Supreme Council of Land and Water. Management Plan FAO Food and Agricultural Organization SIA Social Impact Assessment GoA Government of Afghanistan SOP Standard Operation Procedures GRM Grievance redress mechanism TA Technical Assistance GRC Grievance Redress Committee GRS Grievance Redress Services WB World Bank HH Households WHO World Health Organization HQ Headquarters WRD Water Resources Department IDA International Development WRM Water Resources Management Association IEC Information Education & Communication 41 Executive Summary 1. Project and Background: The Government of Afghanistan (GoA) through the Ministry of Energy and Water (MEW) is implementing the Irrigation Restoration and Development Project (IRDP) with assistance from the World Bank (WB). The project became effective on June 15, 2011, and the current closing date is December 31, 2017. The IRDP will be restructured with the additional financing of US$70 million in June 2016 with an extension of the closing date to December 31, 2019. Accordingly, this Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) replaces the original ESMF dated January 5, 2011 reflecting the new activities planned under the proposed restructuring and additional financing of the IRDP (IRDP-AF or AF). With the restructuring, project development objective of the IRDP-AF has been revised as follows: “to improve access to irrigation in targeted areas, strengthen the capacity to plan and manage dams more safely, and to plan and implement water resources management and development at the basin-level and nationally”. 2. Project components: The IRDP-AF activities will be carried out through the following 4 components: (a) Component A. – Rehabilitation of Irrigation Systems and River Bank Protection (Original: US$70 million, Proposed: US$128 million), (b) Component B. – Support for Dam Development, Operation and Maintenance. (Original: US$31.3 million, Proposed: US$21.3 million), (c) Component C - Water Resources Management and Development (Original: US$8.2 million, Proposed: US$30.2 million) comprising the following two subcomponents: (i) Improvement of Hydromet Services and WRM (USD 23.2 million), and (ii) Support for Developing Legal and Institutional Framework for WRM and Strengthening River Basin Planning (USD 7.0 million), and (d) Component D. – Project Management and Capacity Building (Original: US$39.2 million, no change). 3. Potential environmental and social impacts of the Project under IRDP-AF: The original project is classified as Category A, primarily because of the planned construction of the dams under Component B; proposed restructuring and IRDP-AF will formally drop the construction of the new dams, and focus on the completion of the preparation works, including environmental and social impacts assessments and detailed design. In addition, the proposed restructuring and IRDP-AF will support the following physical investments: (a) continued rehabilitation works for priority irrigation schemes (Component A), (b) river erosion works (Component A), (c) minor repair works for selected existing dams (Component B), and (d) repair and establishment of hydromet data collection stations. It should be noted that these physical investments are in general of small scale and would be considered to belong to Category B. The Category A was maintained because of the continued engagement for preparation for the new dams. 4. In this sense, overall environmental and social impacts of the IRDP-AF will be positive while some minor investment-specific negative impacts may be incurred. In particular, rehabilitation works for irrigation schemes (Component A) will lead to the increase in agriculture production and subsequent increase in income in direct stakeholders. Further, the rehabilitaion works will benefit environmentally as they will increase efficiency and effectiveness of water services. Erosion protection works at river banks will improve land and slope stability of the rivers in the target areas and reduce turbidity of the rivers as well as protect the livelihood of the concerned stakehoders. Completion of the remedials works in selected dams (Component B) will strengthen stability and safety of the target dams and reduce the risk of ultimate dam failure which would cause catastrophic damages to the population. 42 5. On the negative side, rehabilitation works for the irrigation schemes and river bank protection may require some land appropriation, including the temporary occupacy of the working spaces. However, such negative impacts will be moderate, locallized, temporary, and can be mitigated through the application of an Environmental Codes of Practice (ECOP) which will be incorporated into bidding and contract documents with close supervision and monitoring. Minor land acquisition may be required for rehabilitation of irrigation canals and river bank erosion protection works (Component A) and in such cases, the
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents List of Abbreviations
    وضعیت محیط زیست افغانستان فشارها، پیشرفت ها، چالشها و خﻻها The Environment of Afghanistan ( 2010 - 2017) Pressures, Progress, Challenges/Gaps Ghulam Mohammad Malikyar Dec. 2017 غﻻم محمد ملکیار حوت 1396 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................. 6 AFGHANISTAN'S MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSETS .................................................................................... 10 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Physiography ................................................................................................................................................ 11 3. Population and Population growth ............................................................................................................... 12 4. General Education and Environmental Education ....................................................................................... 12 5. Socio-economic Process and Environment ................................................................................................... 13 6. Health and Sanitation ................................................................................................................................... 14 .[3] ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Agricultural Strategy
    TC:TCP/AFG/4552 FINAL DRAFT TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME PROMOTION OF AGRICULTURAL REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES FOR AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN prepared by FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome January 1997 AFGHANISTAN VERSITY I NR II II I I II 111111 3 ACKU 00006806 3 TC:TCP/AFG/4552 FINAL DRAFT TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME PROMOTION OF AGRICULTURAL REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES FOR AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN prepared by FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome January 1997 Printed at: PanGraphics (Pvt) Ltd. Islamabad. CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Assistance to Agriculture 6 1.3 Strategy Development 6 1.4 Constraints 8 1.5 Assumptions 9 1.6 Timing 10 1.7 Strategy Framework 11 2. THE STRATEGY 12 2.1 National Goal 12 2.2 Agricultural Sector Goal 12 2.3 Strategic Priorities 12 2.4 Development Profiles 16 2.4.1 Creating Food Security 16 2.4.2 Increasing Economic and Social Development 21 2.4.3 Raising Skills and Employment 25 2.4.4 Developing Natural Resource Management 29 3. ISSUES 32 3.1 Role of Government 32 3.2 Resource Utilisation 34 3.3 Creating Capacity 35 3.4 Credit 36 3.6 Sustainability 37 4. IMPLEMENTATION 38 4.1 Accurate Data 38 4.2 Delivering Services 38 4.3 Input Supply 39 4.4 Research 39 4.5 Extension and Training 40 4.6 Monitoring and Evaluation 40 4.7 Project Outlines 41 ANNEX 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV
    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • The Informal Regulation of the Onion Market in Nangarhar, Afghanistan Working Paper 26 Giulia Minoia, Wamiqullah Mumatz and Adam Pain November 2014 About Us
    Researching livelihoods and Afghanistan services affected by conflict Kabul Jalalabad The social life of the Nangarhar Pakistan onion: the informal regulation of the onion market in Nangarhar, Afghanistan Working Paper 26 Giulia Minoia, Wamiqullah Mumatz and Adam Pain November 2014 About us Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) aims to generate a stronger evidence base on how people make a living, educate their children, deal with illness and access other basic services in conflict-affected situations. Providing better access to basic services, social protection and support to livelihoods matters for the human welfare of people affected by conflict, the achievement of development targets such as the Millennium Development Goals and international efforts at peace- building and state-building. At the centre of SLRC’s research are three core themes, developed over the course of an intensive one- year inception phase: . State legitimacy: experiences, perceptions and expectations of the state and local governance in conflict-affected situations . State capacity: building effective states that deliver services and social protection in conflict- affected situations . Livelihood trajectories and economic activity under conflict The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) is the lead organisation. SLRC partners include the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), the Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) in Sri Lanka, Feinstein International Center (FIC, Tufts University), Focus1000 in Sierra Leone, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO),
    [Show full text]
  • Part III Description of River Basins
    PART III DESCRIPTION OF RIVER BASINS Picture 38 Two different worlds separated by only a river; on the right bank of the Murghab river, ‘kuchi’ nomad tents in Afghanistan, on the left bank, a cooperative in Turkmenistan. Water is largely unused on the Afghan side. Murichak, Bala Murghab, 21 May 2003 (N35.72, E, 63.19, NW) 62 I. MAPS AND STATISTICS BY RIVER BASIN The map 8 shows the boundaries of the five River Basins delineated for Afghanistan: 1. The Amu Darya River Basin 2. The Northern River Basin 3. The Harirod-Murghab River Basin 4. The Hilmand River Basin 5. The Kabul (Indus) River Basin For each river basin, source of water, transboundaries riparian issues, natural resources, protected areas, land cover, type of agriculture, hydrological infrastructures (dams) and main historical development along water sources are summarized and whenever possible illustrated with pictures. The tables 8, 9 and 10 present statistics on area, population and the main land cover features by river basin. The graph 9 shows that the largest of these 5 basins is the Hilmand basin as it covers alone 43% of the national territory. The other 4 basins have similar size and represent 10 to 14% of the country. In additions to these river basins, there are 4 none drainage areas, namely Namaksar, Registan-i Sedi, Registan and Dasth-i Shortepa. The graph on Map 8 shows that 57% of the total river flow in Afghanistan originates from the Amu Darya River Basin. The Kabul (Indus) and Hilmand River Basins contributes respectively to 26 and 11% of the total water flow.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY SECURITY TRADE-OFFS UNDER HIGH UNCERTAINTY Resolving Afghanistan’S Power Sector Development Dilemma
    AFGHANISTAN ENERGY STUDY ENERGY SECURITY TRADE-OFFS UNDER HIGH UNCERTAINTY Resolving Afghanistan’s Power Sector Development Dilemma Defne Gencer, John Irving, Peter Meier, Richard Spencer, and Chris Wnuk AFGHANISTAN ENERGY STUDY ENERGY SECURITY TRADE-OFFS UNDER HIGH UNCERTAINTY: Resolving Afghanistan’s Power Sector Development Dilemma Defne Gencer, John Irving, Peter Meier, Richard Spencer, and Chris Wnuk © 2018 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 202-473-1000 | www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, World Bank Group, 1818 H Street, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax 202- 522-2625; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Programme (Lrrd) in Afghanistan
    LINKING RELIEF, REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (LRRD) IN AFGHANISTAN JALALABAD: A RESORT CITY OF CHANGE Case study of Jalalabad City (Nangarhar Province) 2006 Rafika Mahmoudi under the supervision of Béatrice Boyer ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank many people without whom I would never have succeeded: The Groupe URD and particularly Béatrice Boyer who has supporting me during all this work as she was in France. She has providing good advices. The NGO “Aid Medical International” based in Jalalabad and Kabul, where I have lived during this entire mission. They have provided all equipment and meanings that they have been on their possession. The Mayor of Jalalabad, Mr Naiem Stanazai for having taken on serious this survey. All the persons I have met during appointments in Jalalabad and Kabul, on the different Departments of Municipality and Ministries. All persons who are working for International Organisations, INGOs and Afghan NGOs for sharing information and data concerning projects on Jalalabad. Thank you for their collaboration and their patience. Government employees working at Kabul on the Ministry of Urban Development for having preparing my final workshop on their office. Most thanks to the Afghan staff (drivers, cooks, cleaners, guards, etc.) of AMI and the Groupe URD. Mahboob, my translator, who has supporting me during this hard work. My husband, my family, my friends, and my past teachers in France. Page 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................11 1.1 Groupe URD and the LRRD programme............................................................................. 11 1.1.1 Presentation of the Groupe URD ................................................................................ 11 1.1.2 Activities in Afghanistan .............................................................................................. 11 1.1.3 Presentation of LRRD programme.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Naghlu and Darunta Hydropower Rehabilitation Project
    SFG1374 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK For the Afghanistan Naghlu and Darunta Hydropower Rehabilitation Project Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat (DABS) February, 2014 Updated November, 2018 1 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 PROJECT OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................................................. 7 PROJECT COMPONENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 7 POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE NAGHLU AND DARUNTA DAM REHABILITATION . 8 POTENTIAL NEGATIVE SOCIAL IMPACTS OF THE NAGHLU AND DARUNTA DAM REHABILITATION .................. 9 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) ............................................................ 10 LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................. 10 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ........................................................... 10 PRE-FEASIBILITY SOCIAL ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ............ 11 APPLICATION OF ‘SAFETY OF DAMS’ POLICY TO THE NAGHLU DAM AND THE DARUNTA
    [Show full text]
  • Main Investment Opportunities in Afghanistan
    Main Investment Opportunities In Afghanistan Afghanistan Investment Support Agency Research and Policy Department Main Investment Opportunities In Afghanistan Collected by: Said Mubin Shah 2009 Said Mubin Shah, RPD Director Main Investment Opportunities In Afghanistan Content Topic Page Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..1 1. Investment Opportunities in Agriculture Sector…………………………………..1 1.1 In vestment Opportunity in Dairy Industry……………………………2 1.2 Investment Opportunity in Honey Industry 1.3 Investment opportunity in Almond 1.4 Investment opportunity in Sunflower Industry 1.5 Investment in Karakul Pelts 1.6 Investment opportunity in Sugar Beet Industry 1.7 Investment opportunity in Olive Industry 1.8 investment opportunity in Cashmere Industry 1.9 Flower and Essence Industry 1.10 Other investment opportunities include (22 agro business opportunities) 2. Investment Opportunity in Mining 2.1 Investment opportunity in Ghori Cement Plant 2.2 Investment opportunity in Kandahar Cement 2.3 Investment in Hajigak Iron Mine 2.4 Investment in Sya Dara Iron 2.5 Investment opportunity in Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) NaturalGas Project 2.6 Investment opportunity in Oil and Gas Reserves in Afghanistan 2.7 Investment opportunity in Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) Natural Gas Project 2.8 Investment opportunity in Oil and Gas Reserves in Afghanistan 2.9 World class Aynak Copper 2.10 Dari Suf coking coal deposit 2.11 Investment opportunity in Gokhe Coal deposits of Saripul Province 2.12 Investment opportunity in Gardab chromites
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Afghanistan's Mineral Wealth
    Managing Afghanistan’s Mineral Wealth: Can Afghanistan’s Mineral Wealth Be Used to Rebuild the Economy? Task Force 2015 University of Washington Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies Cover Photograph Parallels. “Afghan Mineral Treasures Stay Buried, Hostages to Uncertainty.” Digital Image, 2013. Available From: http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2013/05/18/184775139/Afghan- Mineral-Treasures-Stay-Buried-Hostage-To-Uncertainty All trademarks mentioned in this report remain the property of their owners. Their inclusion in this report should no way be taken as an endorsement of this report or its conclusions by the trademarks owners. Printed at the University of Washington in Seattle, Washington Managing Afghanistan’s Mineral Wealth: Can Afghanistan’s Mineral Wealth Be Used to Rebuild the Economy? Faculty Advisor Scott L. Montgomery Affiliate Faculty, Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington, Seattle Evaluator Matthew Golden Economic Team Lead US State Department on Afghanistan, Washington D.C. Task Force Thomas Caetano (Editor) Rachel Caren (Coordinator) Ryan Bersentes | Patricia Denga | Adam Easter | Jessica Mellinger | Devon O’Neill Igor Sirotkin | Michael Lane Smith | Xiangjun Wan | Sara Wong | Sarah Yu The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington Task Force Report 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation in Central Asia in Figures: AQUASTAT Survey
    9 Irrigation in Central Asia in figures AQUASTAT Survey-2012 Cover picture: © FAO Mediabase: Sergey Kozmin Internal picture: © FAO Mediabase: Sean Gallagher, Danfung Dennis, Giulio Napolitano Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org FAO WATER Irrigation in Central Asia REPORTS in figures AQUASTAT Survey – 2012 39 Edited by Karen FRENKEN FAO Land and Water Division FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2013 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107660-6 (print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107661-3 (PDF) © FAO 2013 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Water Resources Development (AWARD) Technical Assistance Project - Technical and Implementation Support Consultancy (TISC)
    Afghanistan Water Resources Development (AWARD) Technical Assistance Project - Technical and Implementation Support Consultancy (TISC) Grant No. TF093637-AF/ Contract No. MEW/957/QBS INVESTMENT PLAN FOR KABUL RIVER BASIN January 2013 AWARD - TISC Grant No. TF093637-AF/ Contract No. MEW/957/QBS AFGHANISTAN KABUL BASIN INVESTMENT PLAN Report submitted by LANDELL MILLS LTD This report was prepared at the request of the Ministry of Energy and Water. The views expressed are those of the Consultants and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Afghanistan or the World Bank. KEY DATA Name of Project: AWARD - TISC (Grant No. TF093637-AF/ Contract No. MEW/957/QBS) Contractor: Landell Mills Limited, Bryer-Ash Business Park, Bradford Road, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8HE, UK Tel: +44 1225 763777 Fax: +44 1225 753678 www.landell-mills.com in association with Mott MacDonald (www.mottmac.com) Contracting Authority: Ministry of Energy and Water, Islamic Government of Afghanistan Beneficiary: Ministry of Energy and Water Primary Location: Kabul Secondary Locations: Nationwide DISTRIBUTION LIST Recipient Copies Format Eng. Farhad, Director of Water Projects 10 English – electronic and hard copies QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT Version Status Date Kabul Basin Investment Plan Version 3 6.02.13 Name Position Date Prepared by: Georg Petersen River Basin Planner 30.01.13 Devaraj de Condappa River Basin Modeller (WEAP) Laura Forni WEAP/LEA Specialist Checked by: Jelle Beekma Senior Consultant, Landell Mills Limited 31.01.13 Simon Foxwell Backstopping Director, Landell Mills Limited 31.01.13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the General Director of Planning, Mme. Zia Gul, Director of Water Projects, Eng.
    [Show full text]