space vector modulated Hybrid Series Active Filter for Compensation

Sushree Diptimayee Swain∗, Pravat Kumar Ray† and Kanungo Barada Mohanty‡ Department of Electrical Engineering National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Rourkela-769 008, India ∗[email protected][email protected][email protected]

Abstract—This paper deals with the implementation of Hy- nomenon between the PPFs and source impedance. But the brid Series Active Power Filter (HSAPF) for compensation of usage of only APFs is a very costly solution because it needs harmonic voltage and current using Space Vector Pulse Width comparatively very large power converter ratings. Considering Modulation (SVPWM) technique. The Hybrid control approach based Synchronous Reference Frame(SRF) method is used to the merits of PPFs and APFs, Hybrid Active Power Filters are generate the appropriate reference voltages for HSAPF to com- designed HAPFs [9], [10] are very much efficient for reactive pensate reactive power. This HSAPF uses PI control to the outer power and harmonic compensation. The design of HAPFs are DC-link voltage control loop and SVPWM to the inner voltage based on cutting-edge power electronics technology, which control loop. The switching pattern for the switching of the includes power conversion circuits, semiconductor devices, inverter of series active power filter in HSAPF is generated using SVPWM technique. The proposed HSAPF is verified through analog/digital signal processing, voltage/current sensors and MATLAB Simulink version R2010 for SRF control strategy and control theory. In active and hybrid power filters, a number of SVPWM technique. The simulated results verified that for both control strategies such as Hysteresis [11], [12], sliding mode SRF-SVPWM based HSAPF and Synchronous Reference Frame control techniques [13], [14] carrier based control [15] tech- with Carrier Based Pulse Width Modulation (SRF-CBPWM) niques are used to regulate the current and voltage generated based HSAPF shows that the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of source current for steady state as well as dynamic condition by the voltage source inverter. But in all the previous cases of non-linear load follows the IEEE Std.519-1992. frequency is variable. Hence, there may be difficulty in the Index Terms—Hybrid series active power filter, harmonic design as well as in the control of noise level. PWM control producing non-linear load, Carrier Based Pulse Width Modu- technique can eliminate these problems. Earlier numerous lation(CBPWM), Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation. Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) techniques have already been investigated, among them SVPWM [16], [17] is most dynamic I.INTRODUCTION and energetic because of its reliability, robustness, simplicity In recent years, huge usage of power electronic devices both in hardware and software and also its performance is such as thyristors, diodes, rectifiers, lighting equipments, un- awesome with small modulation ratio. But the SVPWM is interruptible power supplies (UPS), arc furnaces etc. creates very critical when the no. of levels of PWMVSI increases and large scale of in power systems. These harmonics also it is very complicated in some steps of switching pattern cause many unwanted effects on Power Quality (PQ) such generation. SVPWM depends on CBPWM (carrier based as undesirable computer network failures, premature motor PWM) for achieving better performance. The objective of burnouts, humming in telecommunication lines, excessive this paper is to investigate the detailed study of SVPWM, the heating in rotating machines, interference with communication difference between SRF-SVPWM and SRF-CBPWM.In order circuits, harmonics resonances in the utility and transformer to obtain a better control and better performance, a simple and overheating etc. are few examples of poor power quality in efficient control scheme is required. That’s why SRF-CBPWM power system. Traditionally Passive Power Filters (PPFs) [1], and SRF-SVPWM both used as control algorithm for reference [2], [3] are used to reduce harmonics, but PPFs are unable generation process. The − transformation is applied to to filter out the harmonics in transient condition. The major the control scheme design and aims to generate the reference drawbacks of PPFs are heavy in weight, large in size, bulky, voltage directly in − reference frame. fixed compensation and resonance phenomena. Recently, some The paper is organised as follows, the circuit topology Active Power Filters [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] are widely used for three phase HSAPF is described in section-II, section-III for the compensation of harmonics in power systems. The depicts the control algorithm for Series Active part of hybrid function of active power filter is, to inject harmonic current filter, section-IV disclose the controller design for HSAPF or voltage into the power system with magnitudes same as using SVPWM, section-V explains the simulation results for the harmonic current or voltage produced by a nonlinear harmonic compensation using HSAPF. Section-VI concludes load, but with 180deg phase shift. These APFs are require the paper. a controlled voltage source inverter for producing a reference 1 compensating voltage or current. Active Power Filters (APFs) [2] are capable of damping out the harmonic resonance phe- 1978-1-4673-6540-6/15/$31.00 2015 IEEE Vs Ls R By inverse transformation one can obtain the distorted or har- CLL monic components of the load voltages after the compensation Vs Ls RL of shunt passive power filter. V s L s LL ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ￿ ￿ V cos sin L ah V￿ ⎣ V ⎦ = ⎣ cos( − 2 ) sin( − 2 ) ⎦ d (6) L bh 3 3 ￿ Lc 2 2 Vq VL ch cos( + 3 ) sin( + 3 ) Lc Lf C Cc dc C L f c Therefore, the three phase source currents ,I sa ,I sb,I sc , are Cc transformed into rotating reference frame as: Cc ⎡ ⎤ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ I 2 2 2 sa Fig. 1. Hybrid series active filter with 2 types of nonlinear loads I d cos cos( − 3 ) cos( + 3 ) ⎦ = 2 2 ⎣ I sb I q 3 sin sin( − 3 ) sin( + 3 ) I sc (7) II.CIRCUITTOPOLOGYFORTHREEPHASE HYBRID The obtained currents I d and I q have both DC and AC SERIES ACTIVE POWER FILTER (HSAPF) components. ￿ The circuit diagram includes a series active filter and I d = I d + I d (8) shunt connected passive power filter[1]. The active filter is ￿ connected in series with the source and non-linear load through I q = I q + I q (9) a matching transformer of turn ratio 1 : 1 and the passive If the dq-components of current are low pass filtered and again power filter is connected in parallel with the non-linear load. subtracted from the original components, one can obtains the The PPF includes a third order, fifth order tuned harmonic total harmonic content and the DC-components are eliminated. filters for the harmonic compensation of current on load side. Using inverse transformation, harmonic components of source One converter is connected in series in each phase through current can be obtained as : a matching transformer with a turn ratio equal to 1 : 1. ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ￿ ￿ I cos sin This transformer is required for isolation purposes. The DC sah I￿ ⎣ I ⎦ ⎣ cos( − 2 ) sin( − 2 ) ⎦ d (10) side capacitor is common for all three converters. A PWM sbh = 3 3 ￿ I 2 2 I q control block is designed so that the AC output voltage of sch cos( + 3 ) sin( + 3 ) the converters follows the references that are calculated by The generation of reference compensating signal using the the control block based on the hybrid control approach based combined load voltage and source current detection scheme is synchronous reference frame method. shown in Fig. 2. From fig.2, the error between the reference and the actual DC-link voltage of DC-link capacitor of three III.SYNCHRONOUS REFERENCE FRAME METHODFOR phase PWM inverter fed from the ac system is first passed ACTIVE FILTER DESIGN through a PI controller and then it is subtracted from the In this method three phase measured load voltages are trans- oscillatory component in d-axis. Since the extra fundamental formed from stationary reference frame to rotating reference components are added to harmonic components respectively. frame with as: Thus the reference compensating voltages are also expressed ⎡ ⎤ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ as: ⎫ 2 cos cos( − 2 ) cos( + 2 ) VL a ∗ = K I − V + V Vd 3 3 ⎣ ⎦ Vca sah L ah caf ⎬ = 2 2 VL b ∗ Vq 3 sin sin( − 3 ) sin( + 3 ) Vcb = K I sbh − VL bh + Vcbf (11) VL c ∗ ⎭ (1) Vcc = K I sch − VL bh + Vccf A Phase Locked Loop (PLL) tracks the phase angle of the IV. CONTROLLERDESIGNFOR HSAPF USING SVPWM source voltage, which is necessary for transformation. The TECHNIQUE obtained voltages can be divided into average and oscillating The Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation (SVPWM) is components. generally used as voltage controller to control the IGBT V = V + V￿ (2) d d d switches of HSAPF. It consists of six IGBT switches (s1-s6).

Vq = Vq + V￿q (3) Depending upon different switching combination, PWMVSI produce different outputs. This SVPWM is different from Where , VL a ,VL b,VL c , are load voltages, which are distorted other PWM methods, because it produces a vector as a or asymmetrical in nature. If the dq-components are Low reference so SVPWM is better than other PWM methods. Pass Filtered (LPF) and this LPFs output is subtracted from Reference vector is nothing but the reference compensating original, the DC-components are eliminated and one can get voltage generated by SRF method in -plane. The ON-OFF the total harmonic contents. position of switch is based on the presence of reference voltage ￿ vector on -plane. The switches 1,3,5 are the upper switches Vd = Vd − Vd (4) and switches 2,4,6 are lower switches of PWMVSI. Switches ￿ Vq = Vq − Vq (5) are ON means ’1’ and switches are OFF means ’0’. If all PLL Vdc

* PI Vdc Vsa Isa K dq abc G1 Vsa* current G2 VLa LPF controller G3 * K Vsb current G4 Isb controller Vsb LPF G5 Vsc* VLb current G6 controller abc dq Isc K Vsc

VLc

Fig. 2. Block diagram for reference compensator voltage generation by SRF technique and switching pattern generation by CBPWM upper switches are ON, then upper inverter leg ON and the voltage vector, ∗ is the reference angle. Step-2: Sector defines, terminal voltage is +ve. If all the upper switches are OFF i.e. in which sector the reference output takes rest, for that zero, so the terminal voltage is zero. the calculation of switching time and switching sequence is The upper switches are reciprocal of lower switches. So required. Time duration: V ∗ build up with two active and one zero vector. For sector1 (0 to pi/3): V ∗ can be construct with ∗ 1 2 3 V0 , V1 , and V2. V can be calculated in terms of duration

V * 2 time as c V*= sqrt(V + Vc 2) V* Sector c calculation Sector selection and calculation of vector segments −1sqrt(Vc Vr ef .Tc = V1.T1/T2 + V2.T2/Tc + V0.T0/Tc (14) ∗= tan /Vc) V * c * ∗ V = V1T1 + V2T2 + V0T0 (15)

Tc is the total cycle

Pulse Switching time Tc = T1 + T2 + T0 (16) generation calculation ∗ The location of V ,V1,V2,V0 is explained in terms of mag- nitude and angle as follows: 5 4 V ∗ = V ∗r j (17) Fig. 3. (a)Block diagram for SVPWM implementation 2 V1 = Vdc (18) the probable association of switching states are: 000, 001, 3 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111. There are ’8’ switching states, 2 V = V ej 3 (19) among them six active switching states (v1-v6) and two zero 2 3 dc switching states(V0). The zero vectors are placed in the origin V0 = 0 (20) of axis. Control procedure of SVPWM consists of 4-steps as follows Step-1: calculation of magnitude and angle of r j = cos + j sin (21) the reference voltage vector Step-2: Determination of sector ej 3 = cos + j sin (22) and switching time duration TA, TB, TC for each sector. 3 3 Step-3: calculation of duty time for both upper and lower ∗ Put the values of V ,V1,V2&V0 in (23) switches. Step-4: comparision of duty time with the triangular ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ carrier to generate 6-pulses for IGBTs. Control procedure for ∗ cos 2 1 2 cos 3 Tc ∗V ∗ = T1 ∗ Vdc + T2 ∗ Vdc SVPWM technique are shown in Fig.3. Step-1: Calculation of sin 3 0 3 sin 3 magnitude and angle of the reference voltage vector are given (23) below ￿ Separating the real and imaginary terms in (23), T1andT2 can ∗ ∗2 ∗2 be calculated as |V | = Vc + Vc (12) ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ 3V ∗ V ∗ T = T ∗ sin − = T ∗ a ∗ sin − (24) ∗ − 1 c 1 c V dc 3 c 3 = tan ∗ (13) Vc T2 = Tc ∗ a ∗ sin , (25) ∗ ∗ Where V c and V c are the reference compensating voltage produced by SRF method in -plane, V ∗ is the reference 0 < < (26) 3 ’a’ is the modulation index. The general calculation of duty 200 times for ’n’ no. of sectors as, (V) 0 ￿ ￿ sa n − 1 V −200 T1 = Tc ∗ a ∗ sin − + ∗ (27) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 3 3 Time (S) ￿ ￿n￿ ￿n￿ ￿ T = T ∗ a sin ∗ cos − cos ∗ sin (28) (a) 1 c 3 3 ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿￿ 10 (n − 1) (n − 1)

T2 = Tc∗a − cos ∗ sin + sin ∗ cos (A) 0 L 3 3 I (29) −10 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 T0 = Tc − T1 − T2 (30) Time (S)

Step-3: Duty time calculation for each sector Each sector (b) consists of 7 switching states for each cycle i.e. sector-1 passes 100 through these switching states:000-100-110-111-110-100-000, 0 (A) s

one round and again return back. This occurs at time Tc and I it is divisible among the 7 switching states. Three of them are −100 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 zero vectors. Time (S)

T0 T1 T0 T2 T1 T0 T = + + + + + (31) (c) c 4 2 2 2 2 4 100 T0 For sector-1, the switch is ON between T0&Tc − 4 in the T0 T1

(A) 0 s first phase, between 4 + 2 and for second phase, and so I on. The duty time for each sector is shown in Table-1. Step- −100 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 4: Comparision of T1,T2,T0 with the triangular carrier to Time (s) generate 6-pulses for IGBT switches. (d)

Table.1 200 sector upper switches: S1, S3, S5 Lower switches: S4, S6, S2 T0 T0 S1 = TA + TB + 2 S4 = 2 0 (A) s T0 T0 I 1 S3 = TB + 2 S6 = TA + 2 T0 T0 S5 = S2 = T + T + −200 2 A B 2 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 T0 T0 S1 = TA + 2 S4 = TB + 2 Time (S) T0 T0 2 S3 = TA + TB + 2 S6 = 2 T0 T0 (e) S5 = 2 S2 = TA + TB + 2 T0 T0 S1 = 2 S4 = TA + TB + 2 Fig. 4. (a)Source voltage, Steady state response of (b) load current (c) source T0 T0 3 S3 = TA + TB + 2 S6 = 2 current, Transient response of (d)load current (e) source current for SRF- T0 T0 S5 = TB + 2 S2 = TA + 2 CBPWM based HSAPF T0 T0 S1 = 2 S4 = TA + TB + 2 T0 T0 4 S3 = TA + 2 S6 = TB + 2 T0 T0 follows S5 = TA + TB + 2 S2 = 2 T0 T0 S1 = TB + 2 S4 = TA + 2 T0 T0 sL f 5 S3 = 2 S6 = TA + TB + 2 Z = (32) T0 T0 spf 2 S5 = TA + TB + 2 S2 = 2 s L f Cf + 1 T0 T0 S1 = TA + TB + 2 S4 = 2 T0 T0 6 S3 = 2 S6 = TA + TB + 2 T0 T0 S5 = TA + 2 S2 = TB + 2 J wL f Zspf = 2 (33) 1 − L f Cf w

V. PASSIVE POWER FILTER when The Passive Power Filter(PPF) is connected in parallel 1 w < < ￿ Zspf = wL f (34) with the load. The PPF includes the parallel combination L f Cf of L and C components. The PPF presents high impedance at fundamental frequency and offers very less impedance at i.e The filters impedance is inductive for lower frequencies all harmonic frequencies. PPF provide less impedance for when harmonic current to prevent their flow towards source side. L andC -Are the PPF inductances and PPF capacitances 1 f f w > > ￿ (35) Zspf is the PPF impedance The PPF impedance given as L f Cf 200

(V) 0

1 sa ⇒ Zspf = (36) V Cf w −200 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 Time (S) The filters impedance is capacitive for all harmonics. Fr is the resonant frequency (a) ￿ 1 1 10 Fr = (37)

2 L f Cf (A) 0 L I

−10 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Time (S) VI.SIMULATION RESULTS FOR HARMONIC (b) COMPENSATION USING HSAPF The performance of HSAPF has been tested through MAT- 100

LAB/Simulink. Since the simulations are carried out in a 0 (A) s PC having MS windows 32-bit version installed with MAT- I −100 LAB R2010a. A 3-phase ideal supply voltage is applied to 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12 a harmonic voltage producing non-linear load. This voltage Time (S) producing non-linear load consists of a 3-phase diode (c) rectifier feeding an RL-load. These are two non-linear loads 100 taken here are: Load-1 consists of 3-phase diode bridge

(A) 0

rectifier with a series RL-load connected at DC side, load-2: s I consists of 3-phase diode bridge rectifier with variable resistor. −100 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 Due to this type of non-linear load a harmonic distortion Time (s) occurs in source current. This harmonic pollution causes power quality disturbances. So power quality disturbances can (d) be eliminated by means of HSAPF. Table-I summarizes the 100 simulation parameters. Where Ls and Rs are known as source 0 (A) s inductance and source resistance. Lf and Rf are known as filter I inductance and resistance, Vs is supply mains voltage, C is the −100 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 DC-link capacitance, Kp and Ki are the PI controller gains, f is Time (S) the system frequency, Lpf, Cpf are the passive filter inductance (e) and capacitance. One control approach and two modulation techniques i.e. SRF-CBPWM and SRF-SVPWM are verified 200 and analysed using the following MATLAB simulation results. 100 (V)

dc 0 SRF−CBPWM

At the beginning for steady state condition, only load-1 is V SRF−SVPWM taken into operation untill t=0.3s, and then measured the −100 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 harmonics compensation ability of HSAPF. The performance Time (S) of HSAPF is accessed under dynamic condition has been (f) noticed by sudden change on load i.e. load-2 within t=0.02s to t=0.1s for current harmonic compensation. In order to Fig. 5. (a) supply voltage, Steady state response of (b)Load current (c)source current, Transient response of(d)load current (e)source current for SRF- investigate the validity of the proposed controller, the system SVPWM based HSAPF(f) DC-link voltage for both SRF-CBPWM and SRF- is simulated under MATLAB/simulink version 2010. The goal SVPWM of simulation is to compare the result of SRF-SVPWM based HSAPF with SRF-CBPWM based HSAPF. The THD response of SRF-SVPWM based HSAPF is very less in comparision SRF-CBPWM control technique) with both steady state and to THD of HSAPF with SRF-CBPWM. Also SRF-SVPWM dynamic condition of load are given in Fig. 6. This paper utilizes dc-link voltage properly for switching pattern genera- proofs by MATLAB simulation that both control technique tion but SRF-CBPWM can not use dc-link voltage for PWM under ideal supply condition with steady state as well as generation. Simulated waveforms for supply voltage(Vs), load dynamic condition of non-linear load and results works better, current(IL), source current(Is),dc-link voltage for both steady bringing down the THD of source current below 5% from the state as well as transient condition are presented in Fig. 4 THD of source current of 37% before compensation. SRF- and in Fig. 5 respectively. The nature of source current SVPWM based HSAPF yields better result in comparision to without filter is exactly like load current. FFT analysis has HSAPF with SRF-CBPWM. The THD of source current is been carried out for HSAPF(i.e. for both SRF-SVPWM and decreased to 2.27% for SRF-CBPWM and 1.27% for SRF- TABLE I DATA TABLE

Line voltage and Frequency Vs = 220V(RM S),f s = 50H z Line impedance L s = 0.5mH , Rs = 0.1 Current source type of non linear load impedance L L = 20mH , RL = 50 Series active filter parameter Cc = 60µF, L c = 1.35mH , Cdc = 2000µF, Vdc = 120V Shunt passive filter parameter L f = 1.86mH , Cf = 60µF

THD= 2.27% [2] H.-L. Jou, J.-C. Wu, and K.-D. Wu, “Parallel operation of passive power filter and hybrid power filter for harmonic suppression,” in Generation, 0.5 Transmission and Distribution, IEE Proceedings-, vol. 148, pp. 8–14, 0 Mag (%Mag ) 0 5 10 15 20 IET, 2001. Harmonic order [3] A. Sharaf, H. Huang, and L. Chang, “Power quality and nonlinear load voltage stabilization using error-driven switched passive power filter,” in Industrial Electronics, 1995. ISIE’95., Proceedings of the IEEE (a) International Symposium on, vol. 2, pp. 616–621, IEEE, 1995. [4] H. Akagi, “Trends in active power line conditioners,” Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 263–268, 1994. THD= 1.27% [5] L. Asiminoaei, E. Aeloiza, P. N. Enjeti, and F. Blaabjerg, “Shunt active- 0.5 power-filter topology based on parallel interleaved inverters,” Industrial 0 Mag) (% 0 5 10 15 20 Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1175–1189, 2008. Harmonic order [6] H. Akagi, “Active harmonic filters,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 2128–2141, 2005. [7] M. Benhabib and S. Saadate, “New control approach for four-wire active (b) power filter based on the use of synchronous reference frame,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 353–362, 2005. Fig. 6. (a) THD of source current for SRF-CBPWM(b)THD of source current [8] S. Rahmani, K. Al-Haddad, and F. Fnaiech, “A new control technique for SRF-SVPWM based on the instantaneous active current applied to shunt hybrid power filters,” in Power Electronics Specialist Conference, 2003. PESC’03. 2003 IEEE 34th Annual, vol. 2, pp. 808–813, IEEE, 2003. SVPWM from the THD of source current of 37% before [9] J. Liu, J. Yang, and Z. Wang, “A new approach for single-phase harmonic compensation. current detecting and its application in a hybrid active power filter,” in Industrial Electronics Society, 1999. IECON’99 Proceedings. The 25th VII.CONCLUSIONS Annual Conference of the IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 849–854, IEEE, 1999. [10] M. Aredes and E. H. Watanabe, “New control algorithms for series and In this paper the design of controller of a 3-phase HSAPF is shunt three-phase four-wire active power filters,” Power Delivery, IEEE presented and analysed. Furthermore, SRF method is used as Transactions on, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1649–1656, 1995. control algorithm for reference generation and SVPWM helps [11] M. M. A. Radzi and N. A. Rahim, “Neural network and bandless in the generation of modulated signal. This paper scrutinizes hysteresis approach to control switched capacitor active power filter for reduction of harmonics,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, the correlation between SRF-SVPWM and SRF-CBPWM. vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1477–1484, 2009. Characteristically SRF-SVPWM uses carrier for switching [12] J.-f. Jiang, H.-j. Liu, Y.-p. Chen, and J.-j. SUN, “A novel double pattern generation but there is a dissimilarity in between them hysteresis current control method for active power filter with voltage is that the switching pattern of SVPWM are obtained by space vector,” PROCEEDINGS-CHINESE SOCIETY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 82–86, 2004. vector calculation and the switching signal of CBPWM is sine [13] B. Singh, K. Al-Haddad, and A. Chandra, “Active power filter with wave or sine wave with common mode injection. Thus the sliding mode control,” IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and switching signal of SVPWM has fascilitates switchings that Distribution, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 564–568, 1997. decreases the distortion in output voltage waveform. SVPWM [14] X. Hao, X. Yang, T. Liu, L. Huang, and W. Chen, “A sliding-mode fully utilizes dc-link voltage for switching pattern generation controller with multiresonant sliding surface for single-phase grid- connected vsi with an lcl filter,” Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions but it can not be utilised properly by CBPWM. This paper on, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2259–2268, 2013. verified by computer simulation that the performance of SRF- [15] Y. Tang, P. C. Loh, P. Wang, F. H. Choo, F. Gao, and F. Blaabjerg, SVPWM based HSAPF is superior than HSAPF with SRF- “Generalized design of high performance shunt active power filter with output lcl filter,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, CBPWM. Also the THD of SRF-SVPWM based HSAPF is no. 3, pp. 1443–1452, 2012. less in comparision to HSAPF with SRF-CBPWM. [16] O. Vodyakho and C. C. Mi, “Three-level inverter-based shunt active power filter in three-phase three-wire and four-wire systems,” Power REFERENCES Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1350–1363, 2009. [1] D. Rivas, L. Moran, J. W. Dixon, and J. R. Espinoza, “Improving passive [17] T. Ya-fei, H. Ji-ai, and Z.-w. HUANG, “Simulation and analyzation filter compensation performance with active techniques,” Industrial of space vector pwm [j],” Proceedings of Electric Power System and Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2003. Automation, vol. 4, 2004.