DOCSLIB.ORG

Archbishops Council Corporate Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archbishops Council Corporate Template National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools Report Pocklington Church of England Voluntary Controlled Infant School Maxwell Road Pocklington York YO42 2HE Previous SIAMS grade: Good Diocese: York Local authority: East Riding Date of inspection: 6 November 2014 Date of last inspection: June 2010 School’s unique reference number: 117987 Headteacher: Gill Campbell Inspector’s name and number: Lizzie McWhirter 244 School context Pocklington Infant School serves the market town of Pocklington and the surrounding area. Currently there are 192 pupils on roll, who are almost all from a White British background. Very few children have English as an additional language, have learning difficulties or are eligible for Free School Meals. The headteacher has been in post for six years. The school enjoys close links with the nearby parish church of All Saints. The distinctiveness and effectiveness of Pocklington Infants as a Church of England school are good The Christian vision and dedication of the headteacher, embraced by all, ensures the Christian character of the school permeates all school life. The focus on each individual child in this welcoming and worshipping Christian community encourages positive attitudes amongst its young pupils, who become confident learners and achieve well. The strong sense of a nurturing family environment, underpinned by core Christian values and inclusive of all, whatever their faith background, ensures everyone feels loved. Areas to improve Enhance the evaluation and pupil leadership of worship to increase pupil’s engagement with, and sense of, ownership. Ensure the school’s distinctive Christian character maintains a high profile at every governing body meeting, so that evidence of the explicit link between pupil learning and the school’s Christian character is clearly understood, articulated and monitored. Enable these young pupils to grow in their understanding of God as Father , Son and Holy Spirit, in order to nurture their spiritual development. The school, through its distinctive Christian character, is good at meeting the needs of all learners Pocklington Infants provides an inspiring and creative learning environment where young pupils are proud to belong, feel valued and achieve highly. This is because this infant school is an inclusive, happy and family community, rooted in the Christian faith. More importantly, relationships are very good and everyone lives out the school’s chosen core values of love, hope, peace and trust. Data shows that these young pupils achieve well, so that by the end of Key Stage 1 attainment is significantly above the national average. This is especially true of reading. Pupil progress is tracked at termly meetings, with the headteacher making further checks on individual pupils. This is because the school always has high expectations, but puts the needs of the individual child first. As a result, children are confident to make mistakes and learn from them. Good partnerships exist with parents. Consequently, the annual Open Week is well supported, which enables parents to be involved in their child’s education. They are also able to attend worship, celebrating good work, where awards which include community spirit, leadership and positive behaviour are given to individual pupils. Attendance is good because children regard it as ‘cool to come to school’. There have been few exclusions because children are really loved and cared for. What really matters at Pocklington Infants is that children are seen as individuals and the development of the whole child is the underlying ethos of the school. Inspired by the poppies at The Tower of London, these young pupils made poppies for a poppy tower at their local supermarket. Here learning is aspirational, not just academic; with a wide range of achievement skills being fostered. Good examples include extracurricular activities involving gardening gang, a Year 2 choir and dance and sporting activities. Pupils show respect for the diverse community around them, enriched by visits to all three churches in the town on their religious education [RE] days. Pupils’ global awareness is enhanced by fundraising for charities, as well as learning about other faiths and cultures in their RE lessons. Visits to York Minster help pupils’ understanding about being part of the wider diocesan family. However, pupils welcome meeting people of faith traditions other than Christianity and visiting their places of worship. Pupils enjoy RE and show a good level of religious literacy in relating the Christian story. They are able to speak about incarnation and salvation in their own words. They suggest positive actions for Lent and show great thoughtfulness in creating their outdoor sensory garden with stones so ‘the bumps would be felt by people in wheelchairs’. In addition, children prepare their own picnics for visits to Burnaby Hall Gardens. They also visit Uncleby farm, where they appreciate God’s creation and their role in looking after God’s world; saying it was the ‘best day ever’. They felt they were ‘in the sky’, looking down on a part of God’s world in which they live and move and have their being. The impact of collective worship on the school community is good The attitude of pupils to collective worship is good because the quality of worship offered to them is making a real difference in their lives. The focus on Christian values and the church year contributes greatly to their spiritual development. All staff lead collective worship as worship is recognised as important in the life of the school and always includes liturgical greetings. Pupils and parents speak highly of worship, saying how important it is ‘we are all together as a school family’. Adults, including parents, praise collective worship for its sense of building community, saying their children enjoy it and take part readily. Key festivals are celebrated in church, such as Harvest, Christmas and Easter. Such times strengthen the links between church and school and give children an understanding of their Anglican heritage. Pupils say they like going to All Saints Church to worship as ‘it feels special and a quiet place to worship God’. Worship sometimes takes place outdoors. All pupils enjoyed celebrating the Palm Sunday parade in the school grounds. The chair of governors is a welcome and regular visitor to school; leading worship regularly and a visible presence in school. Pupils especially remember Bible stories he tells, relating them to their own lives, such as the story of Zacchaeus. Each class takes it in turn to lead collective worship every half term. A good NS 11/2014 SIAMS Inspection School Report example includes the Moles class who wrote their own story to show the values of generosity and sharing. Year 2 pupils wrote a welcome service for new pupils, including writing their own prayers. Class prayer corners are interactive and well used, nurturing these young pupils’ spiritual development. Pupils are growing in their understanding of the Trinitarian nature of God. They speak of the Holy Spirit as ‘Jesus promised when he died he would send the Holy Spirit who guides and protects us from bad things’. The chair of governors welcomes helping teach children more about the mystery of the Holy Trinity, especially the role of the Holy Spirit, ‘this power within us’, to nurture their spiritual development Currently, pupil evaluation on worship is gathered through the voice of the school council and from governors’ questionnaires as well as their attendance at worship. However, foundation governors and pupils alike recognise the importance of sharing their viewpoints more often. They are also committed to extending pupils’ opportunity to lead worship so that its integrity and quality continually enhance pupils’ self-evaluation. The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the school as a church school is good Pocklington Infants’ Christian foundation is effectively promoted by the Christian vision and dedication of the headteacher, supported by the clergy, governors and staff. This is also embraced by parents and pupils so that the school’s Anglican foundation is celebrated. Parents praise the fact that their children’s needs are very well met. They especially praise the school’s encouragement, extra support and intervention strategies. This is because pupils’ wellbeing is given a high priority, with church and school sharing the same values. They speak very highly of the ‘brilliant’ headteacher, praising her visible presence in the playground ‘morning and night’. They go on to cite the way she ‘links you with your child’ and how you can ‘trust all the teachers to look after your child’. This is reassuring for parents of very young children. Collective worship and RE have an equally high status in school and are led by the headteacher and a member of the senior leadership team, who share this important folio. Areas from the last inspection have been addressed, showing how the school has moved on, with clear priorities identified for future action. Partnerships are strong, not just with the Roman Catholic Primary School next door, but also with the junior community school, where many of these infant children progress to in their educational life. Community links are very good, with the school holding a positive profile, both locally and in the wider context of the East Riding. Good examples include the school winning awards at the Driffield Show and a gold award for Yorkshire in Bloom. There are good links with the diocese, with RE network meetings often held in school. Pocklington staff take on many roles and responsibilities and benefit from training and support offered to them by the Diocese. The schools’ distinctive Christian character is not a standing item on the governing body agenda. However, foundation governors value this in order to raise its status with all governors. Currently, governors are not explicitly linking standards to the school’s Christian character, but welcome this as they are committed to monitoring the performance of the school and embedding this monitoring with the school’s values.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Sites Consultation
    East Riding Local Development Framework Allocations Development Plan Document - Potential Sites Consultation Part 1: Explanatory Text and Site Schedules May 2010 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction 4 The Allocations Development Plan Document 4 The East Riding Local Development Framework 4 Sustainability Appraisal 4 What happens next? 5 How can I get involved? 6 2 Consideration of Sites 8 Where have the potential sites come from? 8 Where do we need to allocate land? 10 How much land do we need to allocate? 11 What are the considerations for allocating land? 18 3 Potential Sites for Allocation 24 The potential sites plans 24 The schedule of sites 24 The status of sites presented in this document 26 Responding to the sites included on the maps 26 4 Schedule of Sites 30 Appendices Appendix A 32 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction East Riding of Yorkshire Council 3 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document The Allocations Development Plan Document 1.1 The Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) is an important part of the East Riding Local Development Framework (LDF). When adopted, it will allocate pieces of land (sites) for specific uses, including for housing, employment, retail, open space and transport. 1.2 This Potential Sites consultation is the first step in preparing an Allocations DPD. It presents site allocation options for you to consider. It is split into two parts - this document being Part 1, which includes a set of site schedules - and Part 2, comprising a set of maps outlining potential sites in various locations in the East Riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
    Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Diachronic Change in Anglo-Saxon Barrow Burial Practices
    An Examination of Diachronic Change in Anglo-Saxon Barrow Burial Practices By Erin Kathleen DuBois Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Sociology and Archaeology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2012 ©2012 by Erin Kathleen DuBois All rights reserved ii AN EXAMINATION OF DIACHRONIC CHANGE IN ANGLO-SAXON BARROW BURIAL PRACTICES Erin K. DuBois University of Wisconsin- La Crosse, 2012 The Anglo-Saxon period in British history is full of social, religious and political upheaval. Not only is this reflected in the surviving historical record, but also in the collection of burial sites through the island. Over the course of several hundred years the use of the barrow mounds burials seems to change. This study will examine data collected from early Anglo-Saxon cemeteries, ‘Final Phase’ burials, Late Anglo-Saxon cemeteries, and Viking burials in order to better understand the burial traditions that span this period in time. The specific variable to be examined will be body positions, type of burials, the use of grave goods, treatment of outcasts, along with age and sex ranges within each of the above burial types. The use of historical documents will also be used in order to understand the mindset of the individuals reacting to the changes that this period experienced. The results produced by this study will show how the individuals during the Anglo-Saxon period reacted to large number of social changes that occurred because of the Viking invasions during this period of British history.
    [Show full text]
  • U DFJ Records of Francis Johnson 1939-2010 & Partners, Architects
    Hull History Centre: Records of Francis Johnson & Partners, Architects U DFJ Records of Francis Johnson 1939-2010 & Partners, Architects Historical Background: Francis Johnson and Partners, Architects (1937-Present) This firm of architects was established by local architect Francis Johnson in 1937. Based in Bridlington, the office was originally in Manor Street before being moved to its permanent location at Craven House, 16 High Street, in 1940. In the early years there was just Francis and a secretary working at the firm. In 1947 a draughtsman, Brian Smith, was appointed by Francis to help him cope with an increasing workload. The first architect to be appointed was Clive Barnby in 1953 and he remained with the firm until 1971. Tim Pool was the next architect to be appointed, he was with the firm from 1961 until 1967. In 1963 a third architect, Malcolm D. McKie, was appointed and his business acumen proved indispensable to the running of the firm. Malcolm McKie remained at the firm until his retirement. The 1970s and 1980s saw a massive increase in work for the firm, and in 1989 Digby Harris was appointed as the firm's newest architect. In 1991 the leadership of the firm jointly passed to Digby Harris and Malcolm G. Stather. Other employees of the firm have included Roger J.M. Goldthorpe and V. Kemp-Webster. As would be expected, most of the firm's work was located in the East Riding of Yorkshire. Staple commissions tended to be located in Bridlington, Driffield, Filey and the surrounding villages. North Yorkshire also provided the firm with a large number of commissions centred round York itself, Malton, Whitby and Scarborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Address . T. Bulmer &
    ADDRESS . I N submitting to their subscribers this edition of the History, Topography , and Directory of East Yorkshire, the Proprietors trust that the arrang . Thement and treatment of the matter will meet with general approval e compilation of such a work necessarily occupies a considerable length of time, during which many changes take place, but the Editors have endeavoured to kee p themselves au fait with what was passing, and to secure the latest and most accurate information, each town and parish was personally re-visited and revised whilst the sheets were in the press . In the arrangement the New Parliamentary Divisions have been adopted , instead of the old and nearly obsolete Wapentakes ; and the parishes in each follow in alphabetical order . A copious index will still further facilitate reference . Of the plan and scope of the work little need be said . The East Riding is first viewed as a whole, and a resume of its history is given. This is followed b y a sketch of its physical features, soil and agriculture ; and its judicial an d ecclesiastical polity and divisions. Each parish is next passed in review, an d whatever there may be of interest attaching to it is related. The desire of the Proprietors has been to produce a thoroughly reliable and trustworthy book of reference, and they can assure their patrons that no effort s have been spared on their part to secure this important and essential feature . A few errors may possibly have escaped detection, but the Editors are confident that in completeness and accuracy this History and Directory of East Yorkshir e will compare favourably with any hitherto published.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication Allocations Document
    East Riding Local Plan Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Proposed Submission Allocations Document December 2013 PPOCOC--L Cabinet Version “Making It Happen” PPOC-EOOC-E Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Foreword 4 Tests of Soundness 5 1 Introduction 8 2 Locating new development 12 3 Aldbrough 16 4 Anlaby Willerby Kirk Ella 19 5 Beeford 25 6 Beverley 28 7 Bilton 40 8 Brandesburton 41 9 Bridlington 44 10 Bubwith 54 11 Capitol Park, Goole (Key Employment Site) 57 12 Cherry Burton 60 13 Cottingham 62 14 Driffield 69 15 Dunswell 79 16 Easington 81 17 Eastrington 82 18 Elloughton-cum-Brough 84 19 Flamborough 89 20 Gilberdyke/ Newport 91 21 Goole 93 22 Hedon 100 23 Hedon Haven (Key Employment Site) 101 24 Hessle 106 25 Holme on Spalding Moor 112 26 Hornsea 115 27 Howden 122 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 28 Humber Bridgehead (Key Employment Site) 126 29 Hutton Cranswick 128 30 Keyingham 131 31 Kilham 133 32 Leconfield 137 33 Leven 139 34 Market Weighton 141 35 Melbourne 147 36 Melton (Key Employment Site) 149 37 Middleton on the Wolds 153 38 Nafferton 155 39 North Cave 157 40 North Ferriby 159 41 Patrington 162 42 Pocklington 165 43 Preston 173 44 Rawcliffe 176 45 Roos 177 46 Skirlaugh 179 47 Snaith 181 48 South Cave 183 49 Stamford Bridge 185 50 Swanland 187 51 Thorngumbald 191 52 Tickton 192 53 Walkington 193 54 Wawne 196 55 Wetwang 198 56 Wilberfoss 200 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 57 Withernsea 203 58 Woodmansey 206 Appendix A: Planning Policies
    [Show full text]
  • Indexes to Cartulary of St Leonard's, Rawlinson Volume
    Index of Manuscripts British Library Stowe Charters R246, R332, R766–R767 MS Addit. 18276 (Fountains cartulary) R648 MS Addit. 37771 (Selby cartulary) R811 MS Cott. Nero D. iii (Cott.; Cartulary of St Leonard’s) R1, R2, R505, R731 MS Cott., Vit. C. vi (Meaux register) R725 MS Egerton 1141 (Meaux chronicle) R725 MS Egerton 2823 (Byland cartulary) R667, R812 MS Egerton 2827 (Easby cartulary) R665, R667, R813 MS Lansdowne 424 (Meaux cartulary) R725 Bodleian Library, Oxford Yorks. Charters R73, R815 MS Add. A 123 (Gascoigne’s notes) R114 MS Dods. 7 R97, R569–R570, R578, R582, R627–R628, R630, R632, R633, R650, R780 MS Dods. 8 R60, R184, R226, R721–R722, R724, R726, R734–R737, R762, R776, R793–R794, R798 MS Dods. 76 R220 MS Dods. 83 R21, R23, R40, R45–R46, R701 MS Dods. 95 R238, R279, R608, R727 MS Dods. 108 R766–R768, R772 MS Dods. 120b R237, R327–R328, R706–R723, R730–R732, R738–R741, R757– R766, R768, R770–R771, R773– R784, R786–R789, R791, R793, R795, R797, R799–R802, R804– R805, R807 MS Rawl. B. 455 (Rawl., Cartulary of St Leonard’s) R1–R688, R784 MS Top. Yorks. b. 14 (Torre’s catalogue) R487 MS Top. Yorks. e. 7 (Burton transcripts 1) R63–R65, R91, R100, R201, R344, R446, R459, R584, R776, R791, R810 MS Top. Yorks. e. 8 (Burton transcripts 2) R90, R93, R98, R190, R198, R232– R233, R262, R452–R453, R494, R630–R632, R733, R790 MS Top. Yorks. e. 9 (Burton transcripts 3) R98, R186, R343, R354, R373, R671, R729, R777, R779 MS Top.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2017, Yorkshire
    Yorkshire Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 2 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 19 Lancashire 20 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 20 North Yorkshire 20 Craven 20 Hambleton 21 Harrogate 26 North York Moors (NP) 29 Richmondshire 36 Ryedale 39 Scarborough 54 Selby 56 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 60 South Yorkshire 62 Barnsley 62 Doncaster 65 Peak District (NP) 68 Rotherham 69 Sheffield 72 West Yorkshire 75 Bradford 75 Calderdale 79 Kirklees 85 Leeds 90 Wakefield 96 York (UA) 98 II Yorkshire Summary 2017 his has been another good year, with grants of £1.38 million offered for repairs to 18 sites. It is great to record progress on two of Yorkshire’s most famous places. TAfter putting Wentworth Woodhouse back on the Register last year we are now working with new owners to administer a major government grant which is beginning to secure the fabric of the building. At Stamford Bridge, advice rather than grant has removed the risk of damaging development around the 1066 battlefield which is now protected by the East Riding’s Local Plan. We have continued our successful mills campaign with the completion of repairs at Waterloo Mill and developers taking on buildings highlighted in our study ‘Engines of Prosperity’. The mighty Hunslet Mill has a new owner and works are already underway to create new homes there, meeting government objectives for housing and saving our heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • U DDKG Papers of Professor Herbert King 1445 - 1958
    Hull History Centre: Papers of Professor Herbert King U DDKG Papers of Professor Herbert King 1445 - 1958 Biographical Background: Herbert King was born in 1897 and attended Wigan Grammar School. He served in the First World War and then studied Geography at Liverpool University becoming a lecturer after he graduated. He was one of the first members of staff at the new University College of Hull in 1928. He served as external examiner to Liverpool (1935-1939) and Leeds (1937-1940) universities and worked for the Board of Trade during the Second World War. He was appointed Professor of Geography in 1954 after the College received its Charter as a University. He died on 1 March 1958 after a long illness. Custodial history: Donated by Mrs King in May, August and December 1970 Description: The papers of the Professor Herbert King comprise a small number of original documents for the East Riding of Yorkshire, his notes and extracts on the history and geography of the East Riding and a large number of photographs or copies of maps and plans for the region. The original documents include an account roll of the reeve and beadle of Bishop Wilton (1482) as well as a 17th century valuation of the manor, and pains laid in the manor court in 1728. There is a 1653 rental for Newsome, an 18th century terrier of Kilpin fields before enclosure and an 18th century notebook which includes pedigrees of the Hilton and Ellerker families and a copy of a letter from William, Prior of Bridlington, to Thomas Cromwell, confirming that Gilbert of Gaunt and not the King founded the priory (c.1531).
    [Show full text]