Archbishops Council Corporate Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bibliography
Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P. -
Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. -
Potential Sites Consultation
East Riding Local Development Framework Allocations Development Plan Document - Potential Sites Consultation Part 1: Explanatory Text and Site Schedules May 2010 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction 4 The Allocations Development Plan Document 4 The East Riding Local Development Framework 4 Sustainability Appraisal 4 What happens next? 5 How can I get involved? 6 2 Consideration of Sites 8 Where have the potential sites come from? 8 Where do we need to allocate land? 10 How much land do we need to allocate? 11 What are the considerations for allocating land? 18 3 Potential Sites for Allocation 24 The potential sites plans 24 The schedule of sites 24 The status of sites presented in this document 26 Responding to the sites included on the maps 26 4 Schedule of Sites 30 Appendices Appendix A 32 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document East Riding of Yorkshire Council Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document 1 Introduction East Riding of Yorkshire Council 3 Potential Sites Consultation - Allocations Development Plan Document The Allocations Development Plan Document 1.1 The Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) is an important part of the East Riding Local Development Framework (LDF). When adopted, it will allocate pieces of land (sites) for specific uses, including for housing, employment, retail, open space and transport. 1.2 This Potential Sites consultation is the first step in preparing an Allocations DPD. It presents site allocation options for you to consider. It is split into two parts - this document being Part 1, which includes a set of site schedules - and Part 2, comprising a set of maps outlining potential sites in various locations in the East Riding. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds. -
An Examination of Diachronic Change in Anglo-Saxon Barrow Burial Practices
An Examination of Diachronic Change in Anglo-Saxon Barrow Burial Practices By Erin Kathleen DuBois Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Sociology and Archaeology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2012 ©2012 by Erin Kathleen DuBois All rights reserved ii AN EXAMINATION OF DIACHRONIC CHANGE IN ANGLO-SAXON BARROW BURIAL PRACTICES Erin K. DuBois University of Wisconsin- La Crosse, 2012 The Anglo-Saxon period in British history is full of social, religious and political upheaval. Not only is this reflected in the surviving historical record, but also in the collection of burial sites through the island. Over the course of several hundred years the use of the barrow mounds burials seems to change. This study will examine data collected from early Anglo-Saxon cemeteries, ‘Final Phase’ burials, Late Anglo-Saxon cemeteries, and Viking burials in order to better understand the burial traditions that span this period in time. The specific variable to be examined will be body positions, type of burials, the use of grave goods, treatment of outcasts, along with age and sex ranges within each of the above burial types. The use of historical documents will also be used in order to understand the mindset of the individuals reacting to the changes that this period experienced. The results produced by this study will show how the individuals during the Anglo-Saxon period reacted to large number of social changes that occurred because of the Viking invasions during this period of British history. -
U DFJ Records of Francis Johnson 1939-2010 & Partners, Architects
Hull History Centre: Records of Francis Johnson & Partners, Architects U DFJ Records of Francis Johnson 1939-2010 & Partners, Architects Historical Background: Francis Johnson and Partners, Architects (1937-Present) This firm of architects was established by local architect Francis Johnson in 1937. Based in Bridlington, the office was originally in Manor Street before being moved to its permanent location at Craven House, 16 High Street, in 1940. In the early years there was just Francis and a secretary working at the firm. In 1947 a draughtsman, Brian Smith, was appointed by Francis to help him cope with an increasing workload. The first architect to be appointed was Clive Barnby in 1953 and he remained with the firm until 1971. Tim Pool was the next architect to be appointed, he was with the firm from 1961 until 1967. In 1963 a third architect, Malcolm D. McKie, was appointed and his business acumen proved indispensable to the running of the firm. Malcolm McKie remained at the firm until his retirement. The 1970s and 1980s saw a massive increase in work for the firm, and in 1989 Digby Harris was appointed as the firm's newest architect. In 1991 the leadership of the firm jointly passed to Digby Harris and Malcolm G. Stather. Other employees of the firm have included Roger J.M. Goldthorpe and V. Kemp-Webster. As would be expected, most of the firm's work was located in the East Riding of Yorkshire. Staple commissions tended to be located in Bridlington, Driffield, Filey and the surrounding villages. North Yorkshire also provided the firm with a large number of commissions centred round York itself, Malton, Whitby and Scarborough. -
Address . T. Bulmer &
ADDRESS . I N submitting to their subscribers this edition of the History, Topography , and Directory of East Yorkshire, the Proprietors trust that the arrang . Thement and treatment of the matter will meet with general approval e compilation of such a work necessarily occupies a considerable length of time, during which many changes take place, but the Editors have endeavoured to kee p themselves au fait with what was passing, and to secure the latest and most accurate information, each town and parish was personally re-visited and revised whilst the sheets were in the press . In the arrangement the New Parliamentary Divisions have been adopted , instead of the old and nearly obsolete Wapentakes ; and the parishes in each follow in alphabetical order . A copious index will still further facilitate reference . Of the plan and scope of the work little need be said . The East Riding is first viewed as a whole, and a resume of its history is given. This is followed b y a sketch of its physical features, soil and agriculture ; and its judicial an d ecclesiastical polity and divisions. Each parish is next passed in review, an d whatever there may be of interest attaching to it is related. The desire of the Proprietors has been to produce a thoroughly reliable and trustworthy book of reference, and they can assure their patrons that no effort s have been spared on their part to secure this important and essential feature . A few errors may possibly have escaped detection, but the Editors are confident that in completeness and accuracy this History and Directory of East Yorkshir e will compare favourably with any hitherto published. -
Publication Allocations Document
East Riding Local Plan Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Proposed Submission Allocations Document December 2013 PPOCOC--L Cabinet Version “Making It Happen” PPOC-EOOC-E Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 Foreword 4 Tests of Soundness 5 1 Introduction 8 2 Locating new development 12 3 Aldbrough 16 4 Anlaby Willerby Kirk Ella 19 5 Beeford 25 6 Beverley 28 7 Bilton 40 8 Brandesburton 41 9 Bridlington 44 10 Bubwith 54 11 Capitol Park, Goole (Key Employment Site) 57 12 Cherry Burton 60 13 Cottingham 62 14 Driffield 69 15 Dunswell 79 16 Easington 81 17 Eastrington 82 18 Elloughton-cum-Brough 84 19 Flamborough 89 20 Gilberdyke/ Newport 91 21 Goole 93 22 Hedon 100 23 Hedon Haven (Key Employment Site) 101 24 Hessle 106 25 Holme on Spalding Moor 112 26 Hornsea 115 27 Howden 122 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 28 Humber Bridgehead (Key Employment Site) 126 29 Hutton Cranswick 128 30 Keyingham 131 31 Kilham 133 32 Leconfield 137 33 Leven 139 34 Market Weighton 141 35 Melbourne 147 36 Melton (Key Employment Site) 149 37 Middleton on the Wolds 153 38 Nafferton 155 39 North Cave 157 40 North Ferriby 159 41 Patrington 162 42 Pocklington 165 43 Preston 173 44 Rawcliffe 176 45 Roos 177 46 Skirlaugh 179 47 Snaith 181 48 South Cave 183 49 Stamford Bridge 185 50 Swanland 187 51 Thorngumbald 191 52 Tickton 192 53 Walkington 193 54 Wawne 196 55 Wetwang 198 56 Wilberfoss 200 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Contents Cabinet Version 03/12/2013 57 Withernsea 203 58 Woodmansey 206 Appendix A: Planning Policies -
Indexes to Cartulary of St Leonard's, Rawlinson Volume
Index of Manuscripts British Library Stowe Charters R246, R332, R766–R767 MS Addit. 18276 (Fountains cartulary) R648 MS Addit. 37771 (Selby cartulary) R811 MS Cott. Nero D. iii (Cott.; Cartulary of St Leonard’s) R1, R2, R505, R731 MS Cott., Vit. C. vi (Meaux register) R725 MS Egerton 1141 (Meaux chronicle) R725 MS Egerton 2823 (Byland cartulary) R667, R812 MS Egerton 2827 (Easby cartulary) R665, R667, R813 MS Lansdowne 424 (Meaux cartulary) R725 Bodleian Library, Oxford Yorks. Charters R73, R815 MS Add. A 123 (Gascoigne’s notes) R114 MS Dods. 7 R97, R569–R570, R578, R582, R627–R628, R630, R632, R633, R650, R780 MS Dods. 8 R60, R184, R226, R721–R722, R724, R726, R734–R737, R762, R776, R793–R794, R798 MS Dods. 76 R220 MS Dods. 83 R21, R23, R40, R45–R46, R701 MS Dods. 95 R238, R279, R608, R727 MS Dods. 108 R766–R768, R772 MS Dods. 120b R237, R327–R328, R706–R723, R730–R732, R738–R741, R757– R766, R768, R770–R771, R773– R784, R786–R789, R791, R793, R795, R797, R799–R802, R804– R805, R807 MS Rawl. B. 455 (Rawl., Cartulary of St Leonard’s) R1–R688, R784 MS Top. Yorks. b. 14 (Torre’s catalogue) R487 MS Top. Yorks. e. 7 (Burton transcripts 1) R63–R65, R91, R100, R201, R344, R446, R459, R584, R776, R791, R810 MS Top. Yorks. e. 8 (Burton transcripts 2) R90, R93, R98, R190, R198, R232– R233, R262, R452–R453, R494, R630–R632, R733, R790 MS Top. Yorks. e. 9 (Burton transcripts 3) R98, R186, R343, R354, R373, R671, R729, R777, R779 MS Top. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2017, Yorkshire
Yorkshire Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 2 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 19 Lancashire 20 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 20 North Yorkshire 20 Craven 20 Hambleton 21 Harrogate 26 North York Moors (NP) 29 Richmondshire 36 Ryedale 39 Scarborough 54 Selby 56 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 60 South Yorkshire 62 Barnsley 62 Doncaster 65 Peak District (NP) 68 Rotherham 69 Sheffield 72 West Yorkshire 75 Bradford 75 Calderdale 79 Kirklees 85 Leeds 90 Wakefield 96 York (UA) 98 II Yorkshire Summary 2017 his has been another good year, with grants of £1.38 million offered for repairs to 18 sites. It is great to record progress on two of Yorkshire’s most famous places. TAfter putting Wentworth Woodhouse back on the Register last year we are now working with new owners to administer a major government grant which is beginning to secure the fabric of the building. At Stamford Bridge, advice rather than grant has removed the risk of damaging development around the 1066 battlefield which is now protected by the East Riding’s Local Plan. We have continued our successful mills campaign with the completion of repairs at Waterloo Mill and developers taking on buildings highlighted in our study ‘Engines of Prosperity’. The mighty Hunslet Mill has a new owner and works are already underway to create new homes there, meeting government objectives for housing and saving our heritage. -
U DDKG Papers of Professor Herbert King 1445 - 1958
Hull History Centre: Papers of Professor Herbert King U DDKG Papers of Professor Herbert King 1445 - 1958 Biographical Background: Herbert King was born in 1897 and attended Wigan Grammar School. He served in the First World War and then studied Geography at Liverpool University becoming a lecturer after he graduated. He was one of the first members of staff at the new University College of Hull in 1928. He served as external examiner to Liverpool (1935-1939) and Leeds (1937-1940) universities and worked for the Board of Trade during the Second World War. He was appointed Professor of Geography in 1954 after the College received its Charter as a University. He died on 1 March 1958 after a long illness. Custodial history: Donated by Mrs King in May, August and December 1970 Description: The papers of the Professor Herbert King comprise a small number of original documents for the East Riding of Yorkshire, his notes and extracts on the history and geography of the East Riding and a large number of photographs or copies of maps and plans for the region. The original documents include an account roll of the reeve and beadle of Bishop Wilton (1482) as well as a 17th century valuation of the manor, and pains laid in the manor court in 1728. There is a 1653 rental for Newsome, an 18th century terrier of Kilpin fields before enclosure and an 18th century notebook which includes pedigrees of the Hilton and Ellerker families and a copy of a letter from William, Prior of Bridlington, to Thomas Cromwell, confirming that Gilbert of Gaunt and not the King founded the priory (c.1531).