Hugh Blair 1 More Easily Injured
,enator, and a character to Hugh Blair 1 more easily injured. The 1718-1800 I •• ..IJ•~.:',; -•f,j--r, so accomplished as to re· •.,• i p t ? I/" JI racy of composition, or I as may be expected in the ious in age, rank, taste, in- In an 1873 edition of lectures on Rhetoric and Be/le,1·let1res (excerpted here) prejudices, to which he that was published in the United States, the noted teacher Abraham Mills provides, mself. And if he derives for nearly every chapter, a summary and list of questions for students. These ques the richness, the variety, tions call attention lo every detail, every distinction, and every illustration in the 1cprinciples, motive.~. and text. There are, for example, I 11 questions appended lo Lecture 2, on taste ("How his subject furnishes him, does it appear that delivery and correctness mutually imply each other'! In what is inconveniences from this the power of delicacy chiefly seen; and of correctness'! Hating viewed taste in its nost the only engine by most improved state, what does our author next consider'! Why does this bring us to • ,.i~J'.,!-.JJ., ... ,, ,n the passions of his hear the most difficult part of our task?"). This scriptural reverence for Hugh Blair's . abstract qualities, virtues, ·.1 • •• ,,,.: . , ."i: ... ,,,: ;'...[ work is not at all out of the ordinary. Blair is, at least with respect to his influence, Ital chiefly employed by ibition of real persons, the the Quintilian of his time, combining in his rhetoric a theory that met with nearly s. Nor are the occasions of universal approval and a pedagogy that won nearly universal application.
[Show full text]