Royal Roads University Sustainable Food
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sustainable Food Systems Concept and Framework
Sustainable food systems Concept and framework WHAT IS A SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEM? Food systems (FS) encompass the entire range of actors and their interlinked value-adding activities involved in the production, aggregation, processing, distribution, consumption and disposal of food products that originate from agriculture, forestry or fisheries, and parts of the broader economic, societal and natural environments in which they are embedded. The food system is composed of sub-systems (e.g. farming system, waste management system, input supply system, etc.) and interacts with other key systems (e.g. energy system, trade system, health system, etc.). Therefore, a structural change in the food system might originate from a change in another system; for example, a policy promoting more biofuel in the energy system will have a significant impact on the food system. A sustainable food system (SFS) is a food system that delivers food security and nutrition for all in such a way that the economic, social and environmental bases to generate food security and nutrition for future generations are not compromised. This means that: – It is profitable throughout (economic sustainability); – It has broad-based benefits for society (social sustainability); and – It has a positive or neutral impact on the natural environment (environmental sustainability). A sustainable food system lies at the heart of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Adopted in 2015, the SDGs call for major transformations in agriculture and food systems in order to end hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition by 2030. To realize the SDGs, the global food system needs to be reshaped to be more productive, more inclusive of poor and marginalized populations, environmentally sustainable and resilient, and able to deliver healthy and nutritious diets to all. -
Acronyms and Commonly Used Terms
Acronyms and Commonly Used Terms ABE Adult Basic Education ABESAP Adult Basic Education Student Assistance Program (M)AEST Ministry of Advanced Education, Skills and Training AIC (Student) Academic Integrity Committee APA Association of Professional Administrators APPC Academic Planning and Priorities Committee BCCAT British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer BCCIE British Columbia Centre for International Education BCCOL BC Centre for Open Learning BCOS Budget Committee of Senate BOG Board of Governors CABRO Crown Agencies and Board Resourcing Office CAC Campus Activity Centre CAUBO Canadian Association of University Business Officers CAUT Canadian Association of University Teachers CCAC Canadian Council on Animal Care CFI Canadian Foundation for Innovation CFS Canadian Federation of Students CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CIHR Canadian Institute of Health Research CRC Canada Research Chair CSSHE Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education CUBA Canadian University Boards’ Association CUPE Canadian Union of Public Employees ECUA+D Emily Carr University of Art and Design EPC Educational Programs Committee ESAC Environmental Sustainability Advisory Committee Instructional Development & Support Committee (Now IDSC Teaching and Learning Committee) KPU Kwantlen Polytechnic University MOU Memorandum of Understanding NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council OL Open Learning OM Old Main Building PLAR Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition PSEC Public Sector Employers’ Council Promotion, Tenure -
In Focus SUMMER 2001 EDUCATION Edition
in Focus SUMMER 2001 EDUCATION edition I am a part of all that I have met; Yet all experience is an arch wherethro’ Gleams that untravell’d world, whose margin fades For ever and ever when I move. TENNYSON THIS ISSUE 4 Faculty Highlights 8 Education Around the Globe 11 Student News 12 Alumni News Canada Post Corporation Publications Mail Agreement 1720287 3605 de la Montagne Montreal, Quebec H3G 2M1 Ratna Ghosh, Dean of the Faculty of Education, receiving the Order of Canada from the Rt. Hon. Adrienne Clarkson, Governor General of Canada THE MCGILL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION: CELEBRATING 35 YEARS The McGill Journal of Education (MJE) brings new ideas and research in education to a broad local, national and international audience. It seeks to do so in a Dear Graduates and Friends, style accessible to readers from a wide variety of backgrounds, ur society is undergoing great transformations both globally and locally. These among them many people who changes have implications for the context, as well as the content, of education. have studied and worked in the O Fortunately, the Faculty of Education at McGill University is well positioned Faculty over the past four to take up the challenges resulting from social upheavals and scientific and technological decades. advances. The most prominent example of major change in education is the implementation of the Founded by Dr. Margaret Gillett Quebec Reform in the school system. The Faculty has responded to this overhaul by taking a in 1966, the MJE has gone proactive role in providing teachers with opportunities to redefine their roles and update their through several design changes skills. -
Participating Universities and Colleges: Acadia University Algoma University Algonquin College Ambrose University Assiniboine C
Participating universities and colleges: Acadia University Cégep de Thetford Algoma University Cégep de Trois-Rivières Algonquin College Cégep de Victoriaville Ambrose University Cégep du Vieux Montréal Assiniboine Community College Cégep régional de Lanaudière à Joliette Bishop’s University Centennial College Booth University College Centre d'études collégiales de Montmagny Brandon University Champlain College Saint-Lambert Brescia University College Collège Ahuntsic Brock University Collège d’Alma Cambrian College Collège André-Grasset Camosun College Collège Bart Canadian Mennonite University Collège de Bois-de-Boulogne Canadore College Collège Boréal Cape Breton University Collège Ellis Capilano University Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf Carleton University Collège Laflèche Carlton Trail College Collège LaSalle Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue Collège de Maisonneuve Cégep de Baie-Comeau Collège Montmorency Cégep de Chicoutimi College of the North Atlantic Cégep de Drummondville Collège O’Sullivan de Montréal Cégep Édouard-Montpetit Collège O’Sullivan de Québec Cégep de la Gaspésie et des Îles College of the Rockies Cégep Gérald-Godin Collège TAV Cégep de Granby Collège Universel Gatineau Cégep Heritage College Collégial du Séminaire de Sherbrooke Cégep de Jonquière Columbia Bible College Cégep de Lévis Concordia University Cégep Marie-Victorin Concordia University of Edmonton Cégep de Matane Conestoga College Cégep de l’Outaouais Confederation College Cégep La Pocatière Crandall University Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup Cumberland College Cégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Dalhousie University Cégep de Saint-Jérôme Dalhousie University Agricultural Campus Cégep de Sainte-Foy Douglas College Cégep de St-Félicien Dumont Technical Institute Cégep de Sept-Îles Durham College Cégep de Shawinigan École nationale d’administration publique Cégep de Sorel-Tracy (ENAP) Cégep St-Hyacinthe École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS) Cégep St-Laurent Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Cégep St. -
Food, Climate, and the Green New Deal: a Social Contract for Justice?
Our research and analysis is fueled by people like you. Help keep Food First an independent think-and-do tank today at foodfirst.org/support. INSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY SPRING 2019 VOLUME 25 • NUMBER 1 Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey unveil the Green New Deal Resolution. Photo courtesy of Senate Democrats (CC BY 2.0) Food, Climate, and the Green New Deal: A Social Contract for Justice? By Eric Holt-Giménez and Heidi Kleiner The Green New Deal has taken the country by storm. The non-bindingResolution calls for massive public investment in green jobs and green infrastructure to achieve “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions through a fair and just transition for all communities and workers… to be accomplished through a 10-year national mobilization.”1 Unsurprisingly, the Green New Deal (GND) introduced by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA), has been ignored by industry, mocked by Republicans and vilified in the conservative media.2 Though it has nearly 70 co-sponsors, powerful mainstream Democrats are tiptoeing around it, perhaps because they are nervous about angering the fossil fuel industry. And while the GND has been overwhelmingly celebrated by environmentalists, social justice groups are giving it a cautious welcome.3 Ocasio-Cortez and Markey’s GND all farmers and society. A social contract follows on prior initiatives from was established.”9 economist Thomas Friedman,4 the British Green New Deal Group,5 The Green New Deal, crafted by the United Nations -
Mount Royal University 2010 - 2011 Table of Contents
Annual Report Mount Royal University 2010 - 2011 Table of Contents Message from the Board Chair ........................................... 2 Accountability Statement ................................................... 4 Institutional Context Vision ...........................................................................................................................................................5 Aspiration ...................................................................................................................................................5 Mission........................................................................................................................................................5 Mandate Statement ............................................................ 6 Board of Governors ............................................................. 7 Operation Overview 2010/11 Faculty and Staff Overview .....................................................................................................................8 Student Overview ......................................................................................................................................8 Credit Profile ..............................................................................................................................................9 Outcomes Report on Institutional Priorities Budget and Facilities ..............................................................................................................................10 -
2016 Publications & Research Grants
2016 Staff Publications and Research Grants 2012 Royal Roads University For the period of January 1 to December 31, 2012 2016 Publications & Research Grants For the period of January 1 to December 31, 2016 Royal Roads University | 1 2016 Introduction Solution-oriented and real-world focused, Royal Roads University develops and supports applied research which combines the best of scholarship and practice, supports organizations and communities, and responds to new and emerging challenges in the workplace. We are guided by our strategic research themes of learning and innovation, thriving organizations, and sustainable communities, livelihoods and the environment. Researchers at Royal Roads seek to address and respond to critical issues of our time. Engagement with stakeholders and communities is a defining feature. Social and environmental justice as well as responsiveness, guide the university’s research, and its relevance is evident in the mobilization and transfer of knowledge beyond academia and into the public sphere. We are pleased to showcase the scholarly contributions of our faculty and staff in the 2016 edition of the RRU Publications and Research Grants booklet. Office of Research Services Mary Bernard, AVP Research & Faculty Affairs Deborah Zornes, Director Jenny Sigalet, Research Development Coordinator Gwen Hill, Research Development Coordinator Nicholas Mudry, Research Grants/Contracts Coordinator Megan Whonnock, Research Assistant © 2016, Royal Roads University ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This book contains material protected under International and Federal Copyright Laws and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without express written permission from the author / publisher. -
Climate Change and Food Systems
United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021 Scientific Group https://sc-fss2021.org/ Food Systems Summit Brief Prepared by Research Partners of the Scientific Group for the Food Systems Summit, May 2021 Climate Change and Food Systems by Alisher Mirzabaev, Lennart Olsson, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Prajal Pradhan, Marta Guadalupe Rivera Ferre, Hermann Lotze-Campen 1 Abstract Introduction Climate change affects the Climate change affects the functioning of all the components of food functioning of all the components of food systems, often in ways that exacerbate systems1 which embrace the entire range existing predicaments and inequalities of actors and their interlinked value-adding between regions of the world and groups in activities involved in the production, society. At the same time, food systems are aggregation, processing, distribution, a major cause for climate change, consumption, and recycling of food accounting for a third of all greenhouse gas products that originate from agriculture emissions. Therefore, food systems can (including livestock), forestry, fisheries, and and should play a much bigger role in food industries, and the broader economic, climate policies. This policy brief highlights societal, and natural environments in nine actions points for climate change which they are embedded2. At the same adaptation and mitigation in the food time, food systems are a major cause of systems. The policy brief shows that climate change, contributing about a third numerous practices, technologies, (21–37%) of the total Greenhouse Gas knowledge and social capital already exist (GHG) emissions through agriculture and for climate action in the food systems, with land use, storage, transport, packaging, multiple synergies with other important processing, retail, and consumption3 goals such as the conservation of (Figure 1). -
Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System
Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System Case Studies and Recommendations Building a Community-Based Sustainable Food System Case Studies and Recommendations University of Michigan Urban & Regional Planning Capstone Project April 2009 Executive Summary The current global food system, while highly efficient in production, has produced many undesirable social and environmental impacts. Producers’ profit margins have significantly decreased over the last thirty years and agri- business organizations with global networks of production, processing, and distribution now dominate the food industry. Changing economic conditions have decreased the economic viability of small and medium-sized farms, increased fossil fuel consumption, reduced the number of farm-related local business and processing facilities and made the profession of farming less attractive to younger generations. In large part, food production has been removed from our communities, diminishing our collective knowledge of our region and agrarian practices. While the current food system offers consumers inexpensive food, the amount of processing, lengthy distribution channels, and global trade patterns favor prepared food that is calorie-rich but nutritionally deficient. Another challenge is that conventional food retail sources, such as grocery stores, are inequitably distributed throughout our communities. While middle and upper income neighborhoods have many grocery stores, cities such as Detroit, are often characterized as urban food deserts. In addition to large grocery chains and small markets, farmers markets, community supported agriculture (CSA) programs, and community gardens are emerging food suppliers within our communities that offer benefits for all and may specifically address the unmet needs of low-income residents. The food we eat has direct implications on our long-term health and the existing inequitable patterns of food retail disproportionally impact our poorest residents. -
Results of the 2014 Re-Allocation / Résultats Du Processus D'attribution 2014 REGULAR CHAIRS / CHAIRES RÉGULIÈRES
Canada Research Chairs / Chaires de recherche du Canada Results of the 2014 Re-allocation / Résultats du processus d'attribution 2014 REGULAR CHAIRS / CHAIRES RÉGULIÈRES NSERC / CIHR / SSHRC / Special Chairs / Competition Chairs / UNIVERSITIES / UNIVERSITÉS TOTAL CRSNG IRSC CRSH Chaires Spéciales Chaires du concours Tier / Niveau 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1+2 Acadia University 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 4 5 University of Alberta 28 29 17 18 7 8 0 0 52 55 107 Algoma University College 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 Athabasca University 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 4 Bishop's University 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 Brandon University 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 University of British Columbia 36 37 39 40 15 15 0 0 90 92 182 British Columbia Institute of Technology 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 Brock University 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 2 4 6 10 University of Calgary 16 17 13 13 4 4 0 0 33 34 67 Cape Breton University 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 Carleton University 7 7 0 1 4 4 0 0 11 12 23 Concordia University 6 7 1 1 5 5 0 0 12 13 25 Dalhousie University 11 12 8 8 3 4 0 1 22 25 47 École de technologie supérieure 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 6 11 École nationale d'admintration publique 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 École Polytechnique de Montréal 11 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 11 14 25 Emily Carr University of Art and Design 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 University of the Fraser Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 University of Guelph 11 11 1 2 3 3 0 0 15 16 31 HEC Montréal 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 5 7 Institut national de la recherche scientifique 6 6 1 1 1 1 0 0 8 8 16 Kwantlen Polytechnic University 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Lakehead University 1 2 0 1 1 2 -
British Columbia's Museums Sector
British Columbia’s Museums Sector Quick facts The BC Museums Association has over 400 members located in regions across B.C. Total revenues for B.C.’s museums sector are estimated at over $213 million annually. An estimated 4,000 people are employed by B.C.’s museums sector. Over 21,000 volunteers provide over 1 million hours of volunteer work each year. B.C. museums attracted over 8.6 million visitors in 2013, with an additional 21 million online visits to museums’ digital collections and programming. 20,348 school groups visited B.C. museums in 2013. The collections of B.C. museums include over 4 million artifacts and objects, 663,896 linear meters of textual records, close to 12 million graphic materials, over 53,000 natural history/scientific specimens, 36,307 hours of film, video and sound recordings and 2,093 permanent exhibitions. Source: Government of Canada Survey of Heritage Institutions: 2015 The benefit of museums in B.C. Museums and related institutions are vital to B.C.’s creative economy, contributing to jobs, tourism and economic activity in urban and rural communities across the province. Museums, art galleries, historic sites, cultural centres and other memory institutions are keepers of legacy, places of learning, and drivers for the economic and social well-being of our communities. They connect people to collections, to information, to ideas and to each other. B.C. museums are contributing to repatriation and reconciliation by working with Aboriginal communities to recognize the unique histories and experiences of Indigenous peoples and by participating in the respectful return of ancestral remains and cultural belongings. -
10 Principles to Guide the Transition to Sustainable Food Systems
IPES-Food: 10 Principles to guide the transition to Sustainable Food Systems The International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems, IPES-Food, is a new initiative aimed at informing the debate on how to reform food systems. IPES-Food has identified 10 key principles to guide the urgently-needed transition to sustainable food systems. They include principles to shape the sustainable food systems of the future, as well as principles for the types of knowledge and analysis that are required to support this transition. These principles will underpin the work of IPES-Food over the coming years. What types of knowledge and analysis are needed to support the transition? • Holistic & systemic. Hunger, obesity, environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, the pressures on smallholder livelihoods, cultural erosion, workforce exploitation and other problems in food systems are deeply inter-connected. Holistic thinking is needed in order to identify systemic ‘lock-ins’, and to find integrated solutions and potential levers of change. • Power-sensitive. Analysis of food systems must not ignore the differential power of actors to influence decision-making and to set the terms of debate for reform. Power relations and the political economy of food systems must take center-stage. • Transdisciplinary. Knowledge must be co-produced with farmers, food industry workers, consumers, entrepreneurs, and other social actors and movements who hold unique understanding of food systems. Actors from fields such as public health, environment and rural development also have much to contribute to the debate on food systems reform. • Critically engaged. Producer organizations, retailers and other actors in food chains must be fully engaged in defining and developing sustainable food systems.