DOCSLIB.ORG

State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED ANIMALS OF CALIFORNIA August 2007 This is a list of the animals found within California or off the coast of the State that have been classified as Endangered or Threatened by the California Fish and Game Commission (state list) or by the U. S. Secretary of the Interior or the U. S. Secretary of Commerce (federal list). The official California listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.5. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is published in the Federal Register, 50 CFR 17.11. The California Endangered Species Act of 1970 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Rare”. The California Endangered Species Act of 1984 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Threatened”. On January 1, 1985, all animal species designated as “Rare” were reclassified as “Threatened”. Animals that are candidates for state listing and animals proposed for federal listing are also included on this list. A state candidate species is one that the Fish and Game commission had formally noticed as being under review by the Department for addition to the State list. A federal proposed species is one for which a proposed regulation has been published in the Federal Register. Code Designation: Totals as of August 2007 SE = State-listed as Endangered 47 ST = State listed as Threatened 32 SR = State listed as Rare – old designation, all animals reclassified to Threatened on 1/1/85 0 FE = Federally listed as Endangered (18.5% of all U.S. listed endangered animals as of 8/08/07) 83 FT = Federally listed as Threatened (25.2% of all U.S. listed threatened animals as of 8/08/07) 40 SCE = State candidate (Endangered) 0 SCT = State Candidate (Threatened) 0 SCD = State Candidate (Delisting) 1 FPE = Federally proposed (Endangered) 0 FPT = Federally proposed (Threatened) 1 FPD = Federally proposed (Delisting) 0 Total number of animals listed (includes subspecies & population segments) 155 Total number of candidate/proposed animals for listing 1 Number of animals State listed only 32 Number of animals Federally listed only 70 Number of animals listed under both State & Federal Acts 53 Common and scientific names are shown as they appear on the state or federal lists. If the nomenclature differs for a species that is included on both lists, the state nomenclature is given and the federal nomenclature is shown in a footnote. Synonyms, name changes, and other clarifying points are also footnoted. Critical Habitat is defined in Section 3 of the federal Endangered Species Act as specific areas, both occupied and unoccupied, that is essential to the conservation of a listed species and that may require special management considerations or protection. Recovery Plans are discussed in Section 4 of the federal Endangered Species Act. Each plan incorporates site-specific management actions necessary for the conservation and survival of the species. The “List Date” for final federal listing and final Critical Habitat designation is the date the listing or designation becomes effective, this is usually not the date of publication of the rule in the Federal Register; it is usually about 30 days after publication, but may be longer. Changes to this update of the list are denoted by * Endangered and Threatened Animals of California LISTING STATUS CRITICAL RECOVERY HABITAT PLAN Effective List List Effective State Date Federal Date Designation Date Version Date GASTROPODS Trinity bristle snail ST1 10-02-80 Monadenia setosa Morro shoulderband (=banded dune) snail FE 01-17-95 Final 03-09-01 Final 1998 Helminthoglypta walkeriana White abalone FE 06-28-01 *Draft 2006 Haliotis sorenseni CRUSTACEANS Riverside fairy shrimp FE 08-03-93 Final2 05-12-05 Final 1998 Streptocephalus woottoni Proposed 04-27-04 Final 06-29-01 Conservancy fairy shrimp FE 09-19-94 Final3 02-10-06 Final 2006 Branchinecta conservatio Proposed 12-28-04 Final 08-06-03 Proposed 09-24-02 Longhorn fairy shrimp FE 09-19-94 Final 02-10-06 Final 2006 Branchinecta longiantenna Proposed3 12-28-04 Final 08-06-03 Proposed 09-24-02 Vernal pool fairy shrimp FT 09-19-94 Final 02-10-06 Final 2006 Branchinecta lynchi Proposed3 12-28-04 Final 08-06-03 Proposed 09-24-02 San Diego fairy shrimp FE 02-03-97 Proposed4 04-22-03 Final 1998 Branchinecta sandiegoensis Final 10-23-00 Vernal pool tadpole shrimp FE 09-19-94 Final 02-10-06 Final 2006 Lepidurus packardi Proposed3 12-28-04 Final 08-06-03 Proposed 09-24-02 Shasta crayfish SE 02-26-88 FE 09-30-88 Final 1998 Pacifastacus fortis ST 10-02-80 California freshwater shrimp SE 10-02-80 FE 10-31-88 Final 1998 Syncaris pacifica INSECTS Zayante band-winged grasshopper FE 02-24-97 Final 03-09-01 Final 1998 Trimerotropis infantilis Mount Hermon June beetle FE 02-24-97 Final 1998 Polyphylla barbata 1 On January 1, 1985, all species designated as “rare” were reclassified as “threatened”, as stipulated by the California Endangered Species Act. 2 The Federal Circuit Court vacated critical habitat for the Riverside fairy shrimp on 10-30-02. The judge instructed the USFWS to begin the process of re-designating critical habitat for this species. New critical habitat was proposed 4-27-04 and finalized effective 5-12-05. 3 On October 28, 2004 the courts ordered the USFWS to reconsider the areas excluded from the final critical habitat designation made August 6, 2003. The December 28 2004 proposed rule is only for lands previously excluded and does not affect the areas included in the August 6, 2003 final rule. The non-economic exclusions made to the August 6, 2003 final rule were confirmed effective March 8, 2005 4 Due to court order the previously designated critical habitat was vacated and the USFWS was directed to re-proposed critical habitat. The existing final critical habitat boundaries remain in effect until the new proposed boundaries become final, estimated to be about May 2004. 2 August 2007 Endangered and Threatened Animals of California LISTING STATUS CRITICAL RECOVERY HABITAT PLAN Effective List List Effective State Date Federal Date Designation Date Version Date Delta green ground beetle FT 08-08-80 Final 08-08-80 Final 2006 Elaphrus viridis Final 1985 Valley elderberry longhorn beetle FT 08-08-80 Final 08-08-80 Final 1984 Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Ohlone tiger beetle FE 10-03-01 Cicindela ohlone Kern primrose sphinx moth FT 04-08-80 Proposed 07-03-78 Final 1984 Euproserpinus euterpe Mission blue butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Final 1984 Icaricia icarioides missionensis5 Lotis blue butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Final 1985 Lycaeides argyrognomon lotis6 Palos Verdes blue butterfly FE 07-02-80 Final 07-02-80 Final 1984 Glaucopsyche lygdamus palosverdesensis El Segundo blue butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Final 1998 Euphilotes battoides allyni Smith’s blue butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Final 1984 Euphilotes enoptes smithi San Bruno elfin butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Final 1984 Callophrys mossii bayensis Lange’s metalmark butterfly FE 06-01-76 Proposed 02-08-77 Revised 1984 Apodemia mormo langei Bay checkerspot butterfly FT 10-18-87 Final 05-30-01 Final 1998 Euphydryas editha bayensis Quino checkerspot FE 01-16-97 Proposed 02-07-01 Final 2003 Euphydras editha quino (=E.e.wrighti) Carson wandering skipper FE 08-07-02 Draft 2005 Pseudocopaeodes enus obscurus Laguna Mountains skipper FE 01-16-97 *Final 01-11-07 Pyrgus ruralis lagunae Callippe silverspot butterfly FE 12-05-97 Proposed 03-28-80 Speyeria callippe callippe Behren’s silverspot butterfly FE 12-05-97 Draft 2004 Speyeria zerene behrensii Oregon silverspot butterfly FT 07-02-80 Final 07-02-80 Revised 2001 Speyeria zerene hippolyta Myrtle’s silverspot butterfly FE 06-22-92 Final 1998 Speyeria zerene myrtleae Delhi Sands flower-loving fly FE 09-23-93 Final 1997 Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis FISHES Green sturgeon – southern DPS FT7 07-06-06 Acipenser medirostris 5 Current taxonomy is Plebejus icarioides missionensis 6 Current taxonomy is Plebejus idas lotis 7 Includes all spawning populations south of the Eel River 3 August 2007 Endangered and Threatened Animals of California LISTING STATUS CRITICAL RECOVERY HABITAT PLAN Effective List List Effective State Date Federal Date Designation Date Version Date Chinook salmon-Winter-run8 SE 09-22-89 FE9 08-29-05 Final 03-23-99 Draft 1997 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha FE 02-03-94 Chinook salmon-California coastal ESU10 FT11 08-29-05 Final 01-02-06 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha FT12 11-15-99 Proposed 12-10-04 Rescinded 04-30-02 Final 02-16-00 Chinook salmon-Spring-run ST 02-05-99 FT13 08-29-05 Final 01-02-06 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha FT14 11-15-99 Proposed 12-10-04 Rescinded 04-30-02 Final 02-16-00 Coho salmon-Central California Coast ESU SE15 12-31-95 FE16 08-29-05 Final 06-04-99 Oncorhynchus kisutch FT17 12-02-96 Coho salmon-So. Oregon/No. Calif ESU ST18 FT19 08-29-05 Final 03-17-00 Oncorhynchus kisutch FT20 06-05-97 Little Kern golden trout FT 04-13-78 Final 04-13-78 Exempt Oncorhynchus mykiss whitei Lahontan cutthroat trout FT 07-16-75 Final 1995 Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi FE 10-13-70 Paiute cutthroat trout FT 07-16-75 Revised 2004 21 Oncorhynchus clarki seleniris FE 03-11-67 Final 1985 22 23 Steelhead-Northern California ESU FT 02-06-06 Final 01-02-06 Oncorhynchus mykiss FT 08-07-00 Proposed 12-10-04 8 Federal: Sacramento River winter run Chinook salmon 9 The NMFS has completed comprehensive status reviews for 27 west coast salmon & steelhead ESUs, 10 of these in California.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observations on the Mobility of the Silver-Studded Blue Plebejus Argus [Online]
    30 October 2019 © Harry E. Clarke Citation: Clarke, H.E. (2019). Observations on the Mobility of the Silver-studded Blue Plebejus argus [Online]. Available from http://www.dispar.org/reference.php?id=150 [Accessed November 15, 2019]. Observations on the Mobility of the Silver-studded Blue Plebejus argus Harry E. Clarke Abstract: The Silver-studded Blue is often considered to be a sedentary species, not moving more than 50 m during its life. However, based on recent research and my own experience from Surrey, this is not the case. Males can easily move 200 m when relocated away from ant nests, and new sites can be colonised within a few years from source sites at least 3 km away, probably a year or so after the ants Lasius niger or Lasius alienus have colonised. Silver-studded Blue is a butterfly of early successional habitat, so it needs to be mobile in order to find suitable habitat for the next generation. If it was very sedentary, then colonies would soon die out as habitat matures and becomes unsuitable to support the ants and the butterfly. Introduction This article has been prompted by the statements that Silver-studded Blue (Plebejus argus) is sedentary, barely moving more than 20 m, with 50 m considered exceptional, and breeding populations of 100 m or more considered isolated, based on three mark-release-recapture studies (Thomas, 2014) and (Eeles, 2019). This does not agree with my own observations and does not seem consistent with the habitat requirements. Figure 1 - Male Silver-studded Blue on Bell Heather Photo © Harry E.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval-Ant Interactions in the Mojave Desert: Communication Brings Us Together
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones May 2018 Larval-Ant Interactions in the Mojave Desert: Communication Brings Us Together Alicia Mellor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Repository Citation Mellor, Alicia, "Larval-Ant Interactions in the Mojave Desert: Communication Brings Us Together" (2018). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3291. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/13568598 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LARVAL‐ANT INTERACTIONS IN THE MOJAVE DESERT: COMMUNICATION BRINGS US TOGETHER By Alicia M. Mellor Bachelor of Science – Biological Sciences Colorado Mesa University 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science – Biological Sciences College of Sciences School of Life Sciences The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2018 Thesis Approval The Graduate College The University of Nevada, Las Vegas April 12, 2018 This thesis prepared by Alicia M.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriogonum Visheri A
    Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, December 18). Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriogonumvisheri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions listed in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, in particular Christine Dirk, and the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Ode, for their generosity in making their records, reports, and photographs available. I thank the Montana Natural Heritage Program, particularly Martin Miller, Mark Gabel of the Black Hills University Herbarium, Robert Tatina of the Dakota Wesleyan University, Christine Niezgoda of the Field Museum of Natural History, Carrie Kiel Academy of Natural Sciences, Dave Dyer of the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L. McGregor Herbarium, Robert Kaul of the C. E. Bessey Herbarium, John La Duke of the University of North Dakota Herbarium, Joe Washington of the Dakota National Grasslands, and Doug Sargent of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands - Region 2, for the information they provided. I also appreciate the access to files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, Region 2 USDA Forest Service, and Chuck Davis, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Idas-Bläuling (Plebejus Idas Linnaeus 1771) Am Lech
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Berichte des naturwiss. Vereins für Schwaben, Augsburg Jahr/Year: 2003 Band/Volume: 107 Autor(en)/Author(s): Pfeuffer Eberhard Artikel/Article: Der Idas-Bläuling (Plebejus idas L innaeus 1771) am Lech 64-81 Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen©Naturwissenschaftlicher Vereins Verein für für Schwaben, Schwaben download e.V. unter www.biologiezentrum.at 107. Bd. 2003 Eberhard Pfeuffer Der Idas-Bläuling (Plebejus idas Linnaeus 1771) amLech 1. Einleitung Schotterheiden und Weiden-Tamariskenfluren der Alpenflüsse waren in Süddeutschland ursprünliche Habitate des Idas-Bläulings Plebejus idas Linnaeus 1771 (Schwibinger & Bräu 2001). 1836 hatte C. F. Freyer zum Vorkommen des Idas-Bläulings bei Augsburg vermerkt: „Er fliegt in hiesiger Gegend Mitte Juni gerne in den Flussbeeten der Wertach und des Leches“ Ähnlich beschreibt 1860 J. B.K ranz das Habitat im Isartal bei München: besonders in Auen auf kiesigen, sonnigen Plätzen mit schwa­ cher Vegetation sehr häufig“. Kiesige Auenstandorte größeren Ausmaßes mit lückiger Vegetation gibt es heute im Bereich der nördlichen Alpenflüsse nur noch im inneralpinen Raum, außeralpin als Folge der Fluss Verbauungen des 19. und 20. Jh. längst nicht mehr. Dies trifft besonders für den Lech zu. Nur im Oberen Lechtal1 in Tirol ist die Wild­ flusslandschaft des Lechs mit Umlagerungsstrecken und der typischen Zonierung noch weitgehend erhalten. In seinem weiteren Verlauf wurde der Wildfluss durch den Aus­ bau zu einer Kette von Staustufen nahezu völlig und die ehemalige Auenlandschaft weitgehend zerstört. Trotz dieser tiefgreifenden Veränderungen des Flusstales kommt heuteP. idas nicht nur im inneralpinen, sondern auch im außeralpinen Bereich vor: am Oberen Lech in seinen ursprünglichen Habitaten, am Unteren Lech auf Sekundärstandorten.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone
    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Report City of Fort Bragg Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT CITY OF FORT BRAGG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 101 West Cypress Street (APN 008-020-07) Fort Bragg Mendocino County, California prepared by: William Maslach [email protected] August 2016 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT CITY OF FORT BRAGG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 101 WEST CYPRESS STREET (APN 008-020-07) FORT BRAGG MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: Scott Perkins Associate Planner City of Fort Bragg 416 North Franklin Street Fort Bragg, California PREPARED BY: William Maslach 32915 Nameless Lane Fort Bragg, California (707) 732-3287 [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Location & Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Site Directions ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies & Flowers of the Kackars
    Butterflies and Botany of the Kackars in Turkey Greenwings holiday report 14-22 July 2018 Led by Martin Warren, Yiannis Christofides and Yasemin Konuralp White-bordered Grayling © Alan Woodward Greenwings Wildlife Holidays Tel: 01473 254658 Web: www.greenwings.co.uk Email: [email protected] ©Greenwings 2018 Introduction This was the second year of a tour to see the wonderful array of butterflies and plants in the Kaçkar mountains of north-east Turkey. These rugged mountains rise steeply from Turkey’s Black Sea coast and are an extension of the Caucasus mountains which are considered by the World Wide Fund for Nature to be a global biodiversity hotspot. The Kaçkars are thought to be the richest area for butterflies in this range, a hotspot in a hotspot with over 160 resident species. The valley of the River Çoruh lies at the heart of the Kaçkar and the centre of the trip explored its upper reaches at altitudes of 1,300—2,300m. The area consists of steep-sided valleys with dry Mediterranean vegetation, typically with dense woodland and trees in the valley bottoms interspersed with small hay-meadows. In the upper reaches these merge into alpine meadows with wet flushes and few trees. The highest mountain in the range is Kaçkar Dağı with an elevation of 3,937 metres The tour was centred around the two charming little villages of Barhal and Olgunlar, the latter being at the fur- thest end of the valley that you can reach by car. The area is very remote and only accessed by a narrow road that winds its way up the valley providing extraordinary views that change with every turn.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Almanac
    CConservationonservation AAlmanaclmanac Trinity County Resource Conservation District Quarterly Newsletter Winter 20-21 Vol. XXVIIII No. 4 RRestoringestoring TTrinityrinity BBristleristle SSnailnail HHabitatabitat Since 2016, Trinity County RCD’s Revegeta on Program has been in agreement with the California Department of Transporta on to reestablish na ve vegeta on for the Collins Bar Curve Improvement Project near Burnt Ranch, CA. This project is within the known range of the rare and threatened Trinity bristle snail, Monadenia infumata setosa. This terrestrial snail is named for the ny bristles on its shell, which endearingly give it a fuzzy, dirty appearance as it gathers bits of moss and soil. It is endemic to Northwest Trinity County, meaning it is only found in this region, mostly inhabi ng riparian corridors with dense deciduous forests. The Trinity bristle snail eats soŌ vegetaƟ on and lichens Trinity bristle snail prefers to eat so vegeta on such as Photo credit: Len Mazur the stems of violets and lichens that grow on leaf li er and more, to create the dense deciduous forest habitat these organic detritus. This li le gastropod, the class of animals snails prefer. Species planted for this project include: big including snails and slugs, is nocturnal and goes dormant leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), deer brush (Ceanothus in summer and winter. The Trinity bristle snail has a life integerrimus), mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides), span of 15-20 years, reaching maturity at 10 years of age! ¹ Douglas fi r (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Oregon ash (Fraxinus When the Collins Bar project area was disturbed due to road laƟ folia), choke cherry (Prunus virginiana), canyon live oak safety improvements and slide repair, the Trinity bristle snail (Quercus chrysolepis), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), and red- became the most cri cal species impacted.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California the Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database
    State of California The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database STATE & FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED & THREATENED ANIMALS OF CALIFORNIA January 2010 This is a list of animals found within California or off the coast of the State that have been classified as Endangered or Threatened by the California Fish & Game Commission (state list) or by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior or the U.S. Secretary of Commerce (federal list). The official California listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 670.5. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is published in the Federal Register, 50 CFR 17.11. The California Endangered Species Act of 1970 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Rare”. The California Endangered Species Act of 1984 created the categories of “Endangered” and “Threatened”. On January 1, 1985, all animal species designated as “Rare” were reclassified as “Threatened”. Animals that are candidates for state listing and animals proposed for federal listing are also included on this list. A state candidate species is one that the Fish and Game commission had formally noticed as being under review by the Department for addition to the State list. A federal proposed species is one for which a proposed regulation has been published in the Federal Register. Code Designation: Totals as of January 2010 SE = State-listed as Endangered 45 ST = State listed as Threatened 34 SR = State listed as Rare – old designation, all animals reclassified to Threatened on 1/1/85 0 FE = Federally listed as Endangered (21.5% of all U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies
    Wildlife Viewing Yukon butterflies A guide to Yukon butterflies Where to find them Currently, about 91 species of butterflies, representing five families, are known from Yukon, but scientists expect to discover more. Finding butterflies in Yukon is easy. Just look in any natural, open area on a warm, sunny day. Two excellent butterfly viewing spots are Keno Hill and the Blackstone Uplands. Pick up Yukon’s Wildlife Viewing Guide to find these and other wildlife viewing hotspots. Visitors follow an old mining road Viewing tips to explore the alpine on top of Keno Hill. This booklet will help you view and identify some of the more common butterflies, and a few distinctive but less common species. Additional species are mentioned but not illustrated. In some cases, © Government of Yukon 2019 you will need a detailed book, such as , ISBN 978-1-55362-862-2 The Butterflies of Canada to identify the exact species that you have seen. All photos by Crispin Guppy except as follows: In the Alpine (p.ii) Some Yukon butterflies, by Ryan Agar; Cerisy’s Sphynx moth (p.2) by Sara Nielsen; Anicia such as the large swallowtails, Checkerspot (p.2) by Bruce Bennett; swallowtails (p.3) by Bruce are bright to advertise their Bennett; Freija Fritillary (p.12) by Sonja Stange; Gallium Sphinx presence to mates. Others are caterpillar (p.19) by William Kleeden (www.yukonexplorer.com); coloured in dull earth tones Butterfly hike at Keno (p.21) by Peter Long; Alpine Interpretive that allow them to hide from bird Centre (p.22) by Bruce Bennett.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Phenology and Dispersal by a Montane Butterfly: Causes and Consequences of Uphill Movement Merrill A
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Biology Faculty and Staff ubP lications Biology 1997 Host Plant Phenology and Dispersal by a Montane Butterfly: Causes and Consequences of Uphill Movement Merrill A. Peterson Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/biology_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Merrill A., "Host Plant Phenology and Dispersal by a Montane Butterfly: aC uses and Consequences of Uphill Movement" (1997). Biology Faculty and Staff Publications. 46. https://cedar.wwu.edu/biology_facpubs/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ecology, 78(1), 1997, pp. 167±180 q 1997 by the Ecological Society of America HOST PLANT PHENOLOGY AND BUTTERFLY DISPERSAL: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF UPHILL MOVEMENT MERRILL A. PETERSON1 Section of Ecology and Systematics, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA Abstract. In the Wenatchee Mountains of central Washington State, populations of the lycaenid butter¯y Euphilotes enoptes occur patchily with their sole host plant, Eriogonum compositum (Polygonaceae). Nearly all courtship and adult feeding occur on the in¯ores- cences of this long-lived perennial. Furthermore, because females oviposit on in¯orescences and larvae feed only on ¯owers and developing seeds, the window of opportunity for exploiting this resource is narrow. I demonstrated that in¯orescence phenology varied according to the aspect and elevation of plant patches, and butter¯ies were most likely to occur in patches nearing full bloom.
    [Show full text]