Morphological Evolution of Spiders Predicted by Pendulum Mechanics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes
kaft_def 7/8/04 11:22 AM Pagina 1 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY D ISTRIBUTION OF SPIDERS IN COASTAL GREY DUNES Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY- ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL - ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL Dries Bonte Dispersal is crucial in structuring species distribution, population structure and species ranges at large geographical scales or within local patchily distributed populations. The knowledge of dispersal evolution, motivation, its effect on metapopulation dynamics and species distribution at multiple scales is poorly understood and many questions remain unsolved or require empirical verification. In this thesis we contribute to the knowledge of dispersal, by studying both ecological and evolutionary aspects of spider dispersal in fragmented grey dunes. Studies were performed at the individual, population and assemblage level and indicate that behavioural traits narrowly linked to dispersal, con- siderably show [adaptive] variation in function of habitat quality and geometry. Dispersal also determines spider distribution patterns and metapopulation dynamics. Consequently, our results stress the need to integrate knowledge on behavioural ecology within the study of ecological landscapes. / Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eckhart Kuijken [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Dries Bonte Conservation] Co-promotor: Prf. Dr. Jean-Pierre Maelfait [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Conservation] and Prof. Dr. Luc lens [Ghent University] Date of public defence: 6 February 2004 [Ghent University] Universiteit Gent Faculteit Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2003-2004 Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes: spatial patterns and evolutionary-ecological importance of dispersal Verspreiding van spinnen in grijze kustduinen: ruimtelijke patronen en evolutionair-ecologisch belang van dispersie door Dries Bonte Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor [Ph.D.] in Sciences Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Promotor: Prof. -
A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature. -
Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity
Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het college van decanen en ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de biologie aan de Universiteit Gent op gezag van de rector prof. dr. Anne De Paepe, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 augustus 2014 om 10.30 uur precies door Catharina Gesina Elisabeth van Noordwijk geboren op 9 februari 1981 te Smithtown, USA Promotoren: Prof. -
Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites
1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2013. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 13.5 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last updated: 12.12.2012 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008, 2012) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. -
Ground-Living Spider Assemblages from Mediterranean Habitats Under Different Management Conditions
2010. The Journal of Arachnology 38:258–269 Ground-living spider assemblages from Mediterranean habitats under different management conditions Javier C. Barriga1, Luis Lassaletta2,3 and Ana G. Moreno1: 1Departamento de Zoologı´a y Antropologı´aFı´sica, Facultad de Biologı´a, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, c/ Jose´ Antonio Nova´is, 2. 28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]; 2Departamento de Ecologı´a, Facultad de Biologı´a, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, C/ Jose´ Antonio Nova´is, 2. 28040 Madrid, Spain; 3Ecotoxicology of Air Pollution, CIEMAT (ed. 70), Avenida Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain Abstract. Ground-living spiders of different habitats in the Caban˜eros National Park, central Spain, each under different management conditions, were studied to characterize their community richness and composition. Five different habitats were selected: Mediterranean forest, abandoned pine plantations and three kinds of dehesas or meadows (differing in their understory management). In three sampling periods, during two springs and one in fall (2001–2002), a total of 1,152 pitfall traps were deployed in five different habitats. A total of 3,801 adult spiders, representing 105 species from 24 families were collected, among which 13 are considered endemic for the Iberian Peninsula. Correspondence analysis and indicator species analysis showed that spider richness and assemblages differed considerably among the different habitats. The scrub dehesa had the highest ground-living spider richness. Twenty-three indicator species were identified for the different habitats, of which four are considered endemic for the Iberian Peninsula. Gnaphosidae have a high potential as indicators of habitat quality. Keywords: Araneae, dehesa, endemic, Iberian Peninsula, indicator species Ground-living spider (Araneae) assemblages are influenced dehesa (Pineda & Peco 1987; Joffre et al. -
Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites
1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2012. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 13.0 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last updated: 20.06.2012 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. -
Arachnida, Araneae) of the Baltic States, with Remarks on Species New to Lithuania
273 European Arachnology 2000 (S. Toft & N. Scharff eds.), pp. 273-278. © Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 2002. ISBN 87 7934 006 1 (Proceedings of the 19th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Århus 17-22 July 2000) Comments to the checklist of Gnaphosidae and Liocranidae (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Baltic States, with remarks on species new to Lithuania VYGANDAS RĖLYS1 & DALIUS DAPKUS2 1Department of Zoology, Vilnius University, Čiurlionio 21/27, LT - 2009, Vilnius, Lithuania ([email protected]) 2Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT - 2034, Vilnius, Lithuania Abstract Until the present time, a total of 48 Gnaphosidae and 11 Liocranidae species were registered in the Baltic States. The records of Gnaphosa sticta and Zelotes apricorum are doubtful. Old records of Micaria formicaria and Scotophaeus scutulatus cannot be verified by recent data. Despite the given distribution in some sources, no published data on localities of Drassodes hypocrita and Drassodes villosus are available. It is suggested that these six species should not be included in the regional species checklist. Following this, the recent checklist of the Baltic States comprises 42 species of Gnaphosidae and 11 of Liocranidae: 29 species of Gnaphosidae and 9 of Liocranidae known in Lithuania, 31/10 in Estonia and 32/3 in Latvia. Only a few new species known in Central Europe can be expected to occur in this region (Poecilochroa conspicua, Apostenus fuscus, Liocranum rupicola). Some species are found only in one of these countries. Gnaphosa microps, Haplodrassus moderatus, Zelotes aeneus, Agroeca dentigera, Agroeca lusatica, Phrurolithus minimus and Scotina palliardi are new to the Lithuanian spider fauna. -
(Araneae; Liocranidae) in Southeast Asia F
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mining data from legacy taxonomic literature and application for sampling spiders of the Teutamus group (Araneae; Liocranidae) in Southeast Asia F. Andres Rivera‑Quiroz1,2*, Booppa Petcharad3 & Jeremy A. Miller1,4 Taxonomic literature contains information about virtually ever known species on Earth. In many cases, all that is known about a taxon is contained in this kind of literature, particularly for the most diverse and understudied groups. Taxonomic publications in the aggregate have documented a vast amount of specimen data. Among other things, these data constitute evidence of the existence of a particular taxon within a spatial and temporal context. When knowledge about a particular taxonomic group is rudimentary, investigators motivated to contribute new knowledge can use legacy records to guide them in their search for new specimens in the feld. However, these legacy data are in the form of unstructured text, making it difcult to extract and analyze without a human interpreter. Here, we used a combination of semi-automatic tools to extract and categorize specimen data from taxonomic literature of one family of ground spiders (Liocranidae). We tested the application of these data on feldwork optimization, using the relative abundance of adult specimens reported in literature as a proxy to fnd the best times and places for collecting the species (Teutamus politus) and its relatives (Teutamus group, TG) within Southeast Asia. Based on these analyses we decided to collect in three provinces in Thailand during the months of June and August. With our approach, we were able to collect more specimens of T. -
Studies in Liocranidae (Araneae): a New Afrotropical Genus Featuring a Synapomorphy for the Cybaeodinae
European Journal of Taxonomy 40: 1-49 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2013.40 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2013 · Jan Bosselaers & Rudy Jocqué This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:99B180D2-CCD2-4171-B640-E3EB68F94E2B Studies in Liocranidae (Araneae): a new afrotropical genus featuring a synapomorphy for the Cybaeodinae Jan BOSSELAERS1 & Rudy JOCQUÉ2 1, 2 Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium 2 Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D6AD7414-3540-4F06-8631-8873450AA90C 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:CF15016C-8CD1-4C9D-9021-44CA7DC7A5D5 Abstract. Cteniogaster, a new genus of small ground spiders is described from Kenya and Tanzania. It encompasses seven new species, three of which are known from both sexes: C. toxarchus sp. nov., the type species, C. conviva sp. nov. and C. hexomma sp. nov. Three species are known from females only: C. lampropus sp. nov., C. sangarawe sp. nov. and C. taxorchis sp. nov. and one only from males: C. nana sp. nov. The new genus can be recognised by the presence of a posterior ventral abdominal field of strong setae and anterior lateral spinnerets with enlarged piriform gland spigots in males. A cladistic analysis attributes the genus to Liocranidae, Cybaeodinae. The results of the analysis performed do not produce an unequivocal autapomorphy for Liocranidae, but provide a combination of non-homoplasious character changes that offers significant potential for recognising genera as Liocranidae. Moreover, robust apomorphies are determined within Liocranidae for the subfamilies Liocraninae and Cybaeodinae. -
Volume 2, Chapter 7-2: Arthropods: Arachinda-Spider Biology
Glime, J. M. 2017. Arthropods: Arachnida – Spider Biology. Chapt. 7-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 7-2-1 Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 7-2 ARTHROPODS: ARACHNIDA – SPIDER BIOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Subphylum Chelicerata ....................................................................................................................................... 7-2-2 Class Arachnida .................................................................................................................................................. 7-2-3 Arachnid Trapping Limitations .................................................................................................................... 7-2-3 Order Araneae – Spiders ..................................................................................................................................... 7-2-4 Spider Biology ............................................................................................................................................. 7-2-4 Growth Forms and Life Forms ..................................................................................................................... 7-2-4 Bryophytes as Cover .................................................................................................................................... 7-2-5 Trampling .................................................................................................................................................... -
A Completely Resolved Phylogenetic Tree of British Spiders Abstract Introduction
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.434792; this version posted March 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A completely resolved phylogenetic tree of British spiders Rainer Breitling Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, M1 7DN Manchester, UK; [email protected] Abstract 1 The recent accumulation of increasingly densely sampled phylogenetic analyses of spiders 2 has greatly advanced our understanding of evolutionary relationships within this group. Here, 3 this diverse literature is reviewed and combined with earlier morphological analyses in an 4 attempt to reconstruct the first fully resolved phylogeny for the spider fauna of the British 5 Isles. The resulting tree highlights parts of the group where data are still too limited for 6 a confident assessment of relationships, proposes a number of deviations from previously 7 suggested phylogenetic hypotheses, and can serve as a framework for evolutionary and ecological 8 interpretations of the biology of British spiders, as well as a starting point for future studies on a 9 larger geographical scale. 10 Introduction 11 In recent years, the number of large-scale phylogenetic analyses of spiders has been rapidly 12 increasing. Molecular studies, as well as classical morphological work and integrative “whole- 13 evidence” analyses, are covering large parts of spider diversity with increasing density. The 14 last years have seen the publication of several comprehensive phylogenetic studies of the entire 15 order, based on continuously increasing species coverage and ever-larger amounts of (mostly 16 molecular) data (e.g., Agnarsson et al. -
Current State of Knowledge of the Maltese Non-Marine Fauna (2003)
Current State of knowledge of the Maltese Non-Marine Fauna Patrick J. Schembri Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, Malta MSD06 E-mail: [email protected] PREAMBLE both the marine and the non-marine fauna, and it summarised much of the earlier literature as well as gave In 1993 I published the first review of the non-marine additional unpublished information. Since that time, no fauna of the Maltese Islands in 80 years (Schembri [P1], one has attempted to review the Maltese fauna as a 1993), the only previous comprehensive review of this whole, although many studies have been carried out on type being the work of Giovanni Gulia presented in 1913 individual groups. Schembri [P] (1989a; 1991) listed the (Gulia, 1914). I am glad to report that in the past 10 major faunal taxa occurring in terrestrial and freshwater years my review has become outdated in many places; I habitats in the Maltese Islands and gave the number of say ‘glad’ because it means that in the interim period, species known for each, or, in the case of groups which research on the Maltese fauna has continued and new had not been studied, an estimate of the number of discoveries have been made, while existing information species expected to occur on the islands. These estimates has been revised. My previous review is sufficiently out of were repeated and updated in the sections concerning date to warrant a revised ‘new edition’, and this is what biodiversity in the two ‘State of the Environment’ reports I will attempt to do here.