DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H84 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE January 6, 2005 the relief of victims in areas affected by the the Vice President and the Secretary of President and DICK CHENEY of the December 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami for the Senate, the Members and officers State of Wyoming received 6 votes for which a charitable contribution deduction is of the House rising to receive them. Vice President. allowable under section 170 of the Internal The Vice President took his seat as Revenue Code of 1986. Senator LOTT. Mr. President, the the Presiding Officer of the joint con- The bill was ordered to be engrossed certificate of the electoral vote of the vention of the two Houses, the Speaker and read a third time, was read the State of California seems to be regular of the House occupying the chair on his third time, and passed, and a motion to in form and authentic, and it appears left. reconsider was laid on the table. therefrom that JOHN F. KERRY of the The joint session was called to order Commonwealth of Massachusetts re- f by the Vice President. ceived 55 votes for President and John RECESS The VICE PRESIDENT. Mr. Speaker Edwards of the State of North Carolina and Members of Congress, pursuant to The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- received 55 votes for Vice President. the Constitution and laws of the Mr. NEY. Mr. President, the certifi- ant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair United States, the Senate and House of declares the House in recess until ap- cate of the electoral vote of the State Representatives are meeting in joint of Colorado seems to be regular in form proximately 12:55 p.m. session to verify the certificates and Accordingly (at 11 o’clock and 21 and authentic, and it appears there- count the votes of the electors of the from that George W. Bush of the State minutes a.m.), the House stood in re- several States for President and Vice cess until approximately 12:55 p.m. of Texas received 9 votes for President President of the United States. and DICK CHENEY of the State of Wyo- f After ascertainment has been had ming received 9 votes for Vice Presi- b 1258 that the certificates are authentic and dent. correct in form, the tellers will count AFTER RECESS Mr. LARSON of Connecticut. Mr. and make a list of the votes cast by the President, the certificate of the elec- The recess having expired, the House electors of the several States. toral vote of the great State of Con- was called to order by the Speaker at The tellers on the part of the two necticut seems to be regular in form 12 o’clock and 58 minutes p.m. Houses will please take their places at and authentic, and it appears there- the Clerk’s desk. f from that JOHN F. KERRY of the Com- The tellers, Mr. LOTT and Mr. JOHN- MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT monwealth of Massachusetts received 7 SON on the part of the Senate, and Mr. votes for President and John Edwards A message in writing from the Presi- NEY and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut on dent of the United States was commu- of the State of North Carolina received the part of the House, took their places 7 votes for Vice President. nicated to the House by Mr. Sherman at the desk. Senator JOHNSON. Mr. President, Williams, one of his secretaries. The VICE PRESIDENT. Without ob- the certificate of the electoral vote of f jection, the tellers will dispense with the State of Delaware seems to be reg- reading formal portions of the certifi- SWEARING IN OF MEMBER-ELECT ular in form and authentic, and it ap- cates. The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman There was no objection. pears therefrom that JOHN F. KERRY of from Arizona (Mr. SHADEGG) please The VICE PRESIDENT. After the Commonwealth of Massachusetts take his place in the well of the House ascertaining that certificates are reg- received 3 votes for President and John and take the oath of office at this time. ular in form and authentic, the tellers Edwards of the State of North Carolina Mr. SHADEGG appeared at the bar of will announce the votes cast by the received 3 votes for Vice President. the House and took the oath of office, electors for each State, beginning with Senator LOTT. Mr. President, the as follows: Alabama. certificate of the electoral vote of the Do you solemnly swear that you will Senator LOTT (one of the tellers). District of Columbia seems to be reg- support and defend the Constitution of Mr. President, the certificate of the ular in form and authentic, and it ap- the United States against all enemies, electoral vote of the State of Alabama pears therefrom that JOHN F. KERRY of foreign and domestic; that you will seems to be regular in form and au- the Commonwealth of Massachusetts bear true faith and allegiance to the thentic, and it appears therefrom that received 3 votes for President and John same; that you take this obligation George W. Bush of the State of Texas Edwards of the State of North Carolina freely, without any mental reservation received 9 votes for President and DICK received 3 votes for Vice President. or purpose of evasion; and that you will CHENEY of the State of Wyoming re- Mr. NEY. Mr. President, the certifi- well and faithfully discharge the duties ceived 9 votes for Vice President. cate of the electoral vote of the State of the office upon which you are about Mr. NEY (one of the tellers). Mr. of Florida seems to be regular in form to enter, so help you God. President, the certificate of the elec- and authentic, and it appears there- f toral vote of the State of Alaska seems from that George W. Bush of the State to be regular in form and authentic, of Texas received 27 votes for President ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER and it appears therefrom that George and DICK CHENEY of the State of Wyo- The SPEAKER. Under clause 5(d) of W. Bush of the State of Texas received ming received 27 votes for Vice Presi- rule XX, the Chair announces to the 3 votes for President and DICK CHENEY dent. House that, in light of the swearing in of the State of Wyoming received 3 Senator JOHNSON. Mr. President, of the gentleman from Arizona, the votes for Vice President. the certificate of the electoral vote of whole number of the House is adjusted Senator JOHNSON (one of the tell- the State of Georgia seems to be reg- to 429. ers). Mr. President, the certificate of ular in form and authentic, and it ap- f the electoral vote of the State of Ari- pears therefrom that George W. Bush zona seems to be regular in form and of the State of Texas received 15 votes COUNTING ELECTORAL VOTES— authentic, and it appears therefrom for President and DICK CHENEY of the JOINT SESSION OF THE HOUSE that George W. Bush of the State of State of Wyoming received 15 votes for AND SENATE HELD PURSUANT Texas received 10 votes for President Vice President. TO THE PROVISIONS OF SENATE and DICK CHENEY of the State of Wyo- Mr. LARSON of Connecticut. Mr. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1 ming received 10 votes for Vice Presi- President, the certificate of the elec- (HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES— dent. toral vote of the State of Hawaii seems JANUARY 6, 2005) Mr. LARSON of Connecticut (one of to be regular in form and authentic, At 1:02 p.m., the Sergeant at Arms, the tellers). Mr. President, the certifi- and it appears therefrom that JOHN F. Wilson Livingood, announced the Vice cate of the electoral vote of the State KERRY of the Commonwealth of Massa- President and the Senate of the United of Arkansas seems to be regular in chusetts received 4 votes for President States. form and authentic, and it appears and John Edwards of the State of The Senate entered the Hall of the therefrom that George W. Bush of the North Carolina received 4 votes for House of Representatives, headed by State of Texas received 6 votes for Vice President. VerDate Aug 31 2005 05:19 Dec 01, 2006 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 J:\CRONLINE\TYPESE~1\H06JA5.REC H06JA5 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with CONG-REC-ONLINE January 6, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H85 Senator LOTT. Mr. President, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts re- therefrom that George W. Bush of the certificate of the electoral vote of the ceived 10 votes for President and John State of Texas received 5 votes for State of Idaho seems to be regular in Edwards of the State of North Carolina President, and DICK CHENEY of the form and authentic, and it appears received 10 votes for Vice President. State of Wyoming received 5 votes for Vice President. therefrom that George W. Bush of the b 1315 State of Texas received 4 votes for Mr. NEY. Mr. President, the certifi- President and DICK CHENEY of the Mr. NEY. Mr. President, the certifi- cate of the electoral vote of the State State of Wyoming received 4 votes for cate of the electoral vote of the Com- of New Hampshire seems to be regular Vice President. monwealth of Massachusetts seems to in form and authentic, and it appears Mr. NEY. Mr. President, the certifi- be regular in form and authentic, and therefrom that JOHN F. KERRY of the cate of the electoral vote of the State it appears therefrom that JOHN F.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town of Canton Annual Report
    Town of Canton Town2018 of Canton Annual2018 Report TownAnnualTown of of ReportCantonCanton 2018 AnnualAnnual ReportReport 2018 On the cover: Shepard Pond Dam, Reservoir Pond Dam and Old Shepard Street Dam Photos courtesy of Lisa Grega, Assistant Town Engineer and Stephens Associates Consulting Engineers ANNUAL TOWN REPORT TOWN OF CANTON 2018 DEDICATION This Annual Report is dedicated to Retired Officer Thomas A. Keleher Sr. For his 38 years of dedicated service to the Town of Canton and its citizens as a Canton Police Officer And also to Martin J. Badoian For his 59 years of dedicated service to the Town of Canton and its citizens as the Head of the Canton High Math Department. 1 IN RECOGNITION OF THE FOLLOWING RETIREES FOR THEIR DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE TOWN Daniel Beal, Captain, Fire Department Marie Brennan, Administrative Assistant, Building Department Christina Carlton, Executive Assistant, Executive Office Robert Gooley, Sergeant, Police Department Yvon “Mark” Lague, Library Director Philip Levreault, Staff Engineer, Department of Public Works James Penza, Cemetery Forman, Department of Public Works Janis Chapman, Special Education Teacher Pamela D’Agostino, Foreign Language Teacher Nancy Dobbins, Math Teacher Jennifer Henderson, Assistant Superintendent Michael Currivan, World History Teacher Henry McDeed, Assistant Principal IN MEMORIAM OF THOSE WHO HAVE SERVED THE TOWN Robert Antonucci, Council on Aging Bus Driver Martin Badoian, Math Teacher Nicholas Bartone, School Department Custodian Marilyn Foley, School Department Cafeteria Worker Thomas A. Keleher Sr., Police Officer Marie Leary, Election Worker Charles J. Lenhart, III, Skilled Laborer/Truck Driver James M. Maguire, Firefighter Mary E. McWilliams, Librarian Eleanor M. O’Connell, School Department Aide Catherine M.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA
    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA Saturday Morning - 6/5/04 Delegate Orientation Ellen Maisen: Review of consensus-seeking process Reminder of why we seek consensus vs. simply voting: Voting creates factions, while consensus builds community spirit. Facilitators: Magali Offerman, Jim Shannon Notes: Adrienne Prince and Don Eichelberger (alt.) Vibes: Leslie Dinkin, Don Eichelberger Time Keeper: Ed Duliba Confirming of Agenda Ratification of minutes, discussion of electoral reform, and platform plank have all been moved to Sunday. Time-sensitive agenda items were given priority. Consent Calendar Jo Chamberlain, SMC: Media bylaws concerns will also be discussed Sunday a.m. Clarification on “point of process” for Consent Calendar: when concerns are brought up, the item in question becomes dropped from the calendar and can be brought up for discussion and voting later in the plenary as time allows. I. GPUS Post-First-Round Ballot Voting Instructions Proposal - Nanette Pratini, Jonathan Lundell, Jim Stauffer Regarding convention delegate voting procedure: “If a delegate’s assigned candidate withdraws from the race or if subsequent votes are required…delegates will vote using their best judgment…as to what the voters who selected their assigned candidate would choose.” Floor rules in process of being approved by national CC. Will be conducted as a series of rounds, announced state by state. For first round, delegates are tied to the candidates as represented in the primary. If someone wins and does not want to accept the vote, subsequent rounds will vote. If a willing candidate gets a majority, they will be nominated, If “no candidate” (an option) wins, there will be an IRV election for an endorsement instead of a nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign
    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Election Day Scenarios October 27, 2020
    HealthyElections.org Post-Election Day Scenarios October 27, 2020 Abstract: Confronted with likely delays in counting an unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, close vote counts in key battleground states, the prospect of allegations of election fraud, and an intensely polarized political climate, the United States faces the possibility of highly contested election results on and after November 3. This paper explores some unlikely but conceivable scenarios that could emerge, such as a state legislature's appointment of a slate of electors before the state’s popular vote is fully counted, a Congress faced with two conicting slates of electors from the same state, and the death of a presidential candidate. These G oogle Slides correspond to the content of this memo and might be useful for a presentation covering the material. Authors : Maia Brockbank, Joven Hundal, Zahavah Levine, Anastasiia Malenko, and Alissa Vuillier Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 November 4 - December 13: Post-Election Day Scenarios 2 Scenario 1: State Legislature Appoints Electors Before Popular Vote is Certied 2 December 14 - January 6: Reporting Votes to Congress 4 Scenario 2: State Misses Deadline to Send Its Slate to Electoral College 4 Scenario 3: Faithless Electors Defect and Change Election Outcome 5 January 6 -19: Congressional Counting of Electoral Votes 5 Scenario 4: Congress Faces Two Conicting Electoral Slates from a State 6 Scenario 5: No Candidate Receives a Majority of Electoral Votes 9 January 20: Inauguration Day 10 Scenario 6: No Clear Winner on Inauguration Day 10 Scenario 7: Judicial Intervention Determines Election Outcome 10 A Presidential Candidate Dies 11 Scenario 8: A Presidential Candidate Dies Before or After Election Day 11 Introduction The 2020 presidential election has already emerged as one of the most hotly contested in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the President Cancel Or Postpone the General Election? ______
    CAN THE PRESIDENT CANCEL OR POSTPONE THE GENERAL ELECTION? ____________________________________________________________ Summary: Unlike the primaries, which are governed by state law and take place on different ​ dates across the country, federal law—which only Congress can change—sets November 3rd as the date of the general election. The president has no authority to change this date. The Constitution also significantly limits the ability of Congress to delay choosing the next president, even if it wants to—as under no circumstance can any president’s term be extended past noon on January 20th without amending the Constitution. ➢ The U.S. Constitution and Federal Law Require That the Election Be Completed by Early January Presidential elections in the United States are governed by a combination of the U.S. Constitution and federal, state, and local laws. The overall timing of the general presidential election is governed primarily by federal law, but also constrained by the Constitution.1 The actual mechanics of conducting the election are governed primarily by state and local law. The president is technically chosen by the Electoral College, which is composed of electors from each state.2 The Constitution provides that each state “shall appoint” its electors for president “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2. That means that the fifty states and the District of Columbia have the ability, through their legislatures, to decide how to choose the electors who will participate in the Electoral College. All states have chosen to do so based on the popular vote—in other words, whichever candidate wins the most votes in the state on Election Day generally also wins the state’s electors.3 1 See the Appendix for a more detailed timeline.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Melrose Annual Report
    CITY OF MELROSE MASSACHUSETTS WITH Mayor’s Inaugural Address Delivered January 6th, 1913 PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY CLERK Meerose, Mass. Melrose Free Press, Inc. 19H . OLIVER B, MUNROE MAYOR INAUGURAL ADDRESS OF OLIiZER B. MUNROE MAYOR OF MELROSE DELIVERED JANUARY 6th, 1913 Mr. President and Members of the Board of Aldermen, Fellow Citizens : In assuming the duties of the office to which I have been elected by the will of the people, I am keenly mindful of its responsibilities and the seriousness of the service which I am called upon to render. The people are demanding and have the right to demand that those whom they elect to public office shall “make good” and it is a gratifying sign of the times that they are holding those whom they thus honor, to a more rigid accountability for the trust reposed in them. The chief executive who faithfully and efficiently serves the peo- ple must constantly have before him what the best interests of the community as a whole- require, what is most conducive to its material welfare, its growth and prosperity along right lines, involving of course all questions of conveniences and improvements, a wise husbanding of its resources, its increase in enlightenment and morality, the promo- tion of law and order, the safeguarding of life and property, and the amelioration of conditions under which human life is lived. It is evident that the successful meeting of these requirem mts in- volves the putting forth of the best effort of which one is capable.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210106111314445 Gohmert V Pence Stay Appl Signed.Pdf
    No. __A__________ In the Supreme Court of the United States LOUIE GOHMERT, TYLER BOWYER, NANCY COTTLE, JAKE HOFFMAN, ANTHONY KERN, JAMES R. LAMON, SAM MOORHEAD, ROBERT MONTGOMERY, LORAINE PELLEGRINO, GREG SAFSTEN, KELLI WARD AND MICHAEL WARD, Applicants, v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. PENCE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY. Respondent. EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL A. ALITO AS CIRCUIT JUSTICE FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY AND INTERIM RELIEF PENDING RESOLUTION OF A TIMELY FILED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI William L. Sessions Sidney Powell* Texas Bar No. 18041500 Texas Bar No. 16209700 SESSIONS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC SIDNEY POWELL, P.C. 14591 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100 Dallas, TX 75254 Dallas, TX 72519 Tel: (214) 217-8855 Tel: (214) 628-9514 Fax: (214) 723-5346 Fax: (214) 628-9505 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawrence J. Joseph Howard Kleinhendler DC Bar #464777 NY Bar No. 2657120 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE J. JOSEPH HOWARD KLEINHENDLER ESQUIRE 1250 Connecticut Av NW, Ste 700 369 Lexington Ave., 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 New York, New York 10017 Tel: (202) 355-9452 Tel: (917) 793-1188 Fax: (202) 318-2254 Fax: (732) 901-0832 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Counsel for Applicants * Counsel of Record PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Applicants (plaintiffs-appellants below) are U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Tyler Bowyer, Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman, Anthony Kern, James R. Lamon, Sam Moorhead, Robert Montgomery, Loraine Pellegrino, Greg Safsten, Kelli Ward, and Michael Ward. Respondent (defendant-appellee below) is the Honorable Michael R.
    [Show full text]
  • Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General
    Mimi Newton, Sacramento GA Note- Taker GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA June 2017 General Assembly Minutes Sacramento, June 17-18, 2017 ATTENDEES: Name County Sacramento Delegate status Present/Absent Brett Dixon Alameda Delegate P Greg Jan Alameda Delegate P James McFadden Alameda Not delegate P Jan Arnold Alameda Delegate P Laura Wells Alameda Delegate P Maxine Daniel Alameda Delegate P Michael Rubin Alameda Delegate P Pam Spevack Alameda Delegate P Paul Rea Alameda Delegate P Phoebe Sorgen Alameda Delegate P Erik Rydberg Butte Delegate P Bert Heuer Contra Costa Not delegate P Brian Deckman Contra Costa Not delegate P Meleiza Figueroa Contra Costa Not delegate P Tim Laidman Contra Costa Delegate P Megan Buckingham Fresno Delegate P David Cobb Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Jim Smith Humboldt Delegate P Kelsey Reedy Humboldt Not delegate P Kyle Dust Humboldt Delegate P Matt Smith-Caggiano Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Cassidy Sheppard Kern Delegate P Penny Sheppard Kern Delegate P Ajay Rai Los Angeles Delegate P Andrea Houtman Los Angeles Not delegate P Angel Orellana Los Angeles Delegate P Angelina Saucedo Los Angeles Delegate P Cesar Gonzalez Los Angeles Not delegate P Christopher Cruz Los Angeles Delegate P Daniel Mata Los Angeles Delegate P Doug Barnett Los Angeles Delegate P Fernando Ramirez Los Angeles Delegate P James Lauderdale Los Angeles Not delegate P Jimmy Rivera Los Angeles Delegate P Kenneth Mejia Los Angeles Delegate P Lisa Salvary Los Angeles Delegate P Liz Solis Los Angeles Delegate P Marla Bernstein Los Angeles Delegate P Martin Conway
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Ballots Until All Valid Votes Have Been Tallied
    Nos. 20A53, 20A54 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ______________ JOSEPH B. SCARNATI III, ET AL., Applicants, v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Respondents. _________ REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Applicant, v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL., Respondents. __________ On Applications to Stay the Mandate of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ________________ RESPONSE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY RESPONDENTS ________ Lazar M. Palnick Clifford B. Levine 1216 Heberton Street Counsel of Record Pittsburgh, PA 15206 Alex M. Lacey (412) 661-3633 Dentons Cohen & Grigsby P.C. 625 Liberty Avenue Kevin Greenberg A. Michael Pratt Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3152 Adam Roseman (412) 297-4900 Greenberg Traurig, LLP [email protected] 1717 Arch Street, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 988-7818 Counsel for Respondents Pennsylvania Democratic Party, Nilofer Nina Ahmad, Danilo Burgos, Austin Davis, Dwight Evans, Isabella Fitzgerald, Edward Gainey, Manuel M. Guzman, Jr., Jordan A. Harris, Arthur Haywood, Malcolm Kenyatta, Patty H. Kim, Stephen Kinsey, Peter Schweyer, Sharif Street, and Anthony H. Williams RULE 29.6 STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 29.6 of the Rules of this Court, Respondent Pennsylvania Democratic Party states that it has no parent corporation and that there is no publicly held company that owns 10% or more of its stock. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page RULE 29.6 STATEMENT .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red State, Blue State July 2012
    P age | 2 Red State, Blue State July 2012 Demographic Change and Presidential Politics in Virginia By Dustin A. Cable and Michele P. Claibourn Executive Summary Virginia is one of the most closely watched battleground states in the upcoming presidential election, with the commonwealth’s 13 electoral votes figuring prominently in the strategies of both the Republi- cans and Democrats. Until Barack Obama’s upset victory in Virginia four years ago, the commonwealth had not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since 1964. Some political analysts believe de- mographic trends have finally, and perhaps permanently, tilted Virginia from a “red” state to a “blue” state. Such prognostications may be overblown. Demography is not political destiny; it only helps to establish the field on which the major contenders must play. The economy, current events, and the candidates themselves have at least an equal role. At the same time, demography suggests coalitions that might be formed, viable persuasive appeals candidates might make, and the most effective tactics campaigns might employ. Throughout history, successful political leaders have recognized and capitalized on de- mographic change to win victories for their parties. This report briefly reviews Virginia’s political history, analyzes trends within key demographic groups over the past twenty years, and simulates the 2012 presidential election based on patterns seen in the last two presidential contests. Among the major findings: • While Virginia’s minority population has grown significantly, this has not yet led to cor- responding increases in the minority proportion of eligible voters. • Nevertheless, the white (non-Hispanic) share of the 2012 voting-eligible population is expected to drop by two percentage points from 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Green Party Platform
    Platform 2010 Green Party of the United States As Adopted by the Green National Committee September 2010 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004
    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004 I. Voter Suppression A. Overly Restrictive Registration Requirements B. Incompetence in Processing Registrations C. Challenges to New Registrants on Insufficient Grounds D. Misinformation About Voting Status/Location/Date E. Voter Intimidation F. Voting Machine Shortages/Malfunctions G. Overly Restrictive Rules & Incorrect Procedure Regarding Provisional Ballots H. Poorly Designed Absentee Ballots Caused Voters to Mark Incorrect Candidate II. Access to Voting Systems Before Election Violates Protocol III. A Third-Rate Burglary in Toledo IV. Suspect Results A. Registration Irregularities B. Exceptionally High Voter Turnout C. More Votes than Voters D. Exceptionally High Rates of Undervotes E. High Rate of Overvotes Due to Ballots Pre-Punched for Bush? F. The Kerry/Connally Discrepancy G. Discrepancy between Exit Polls & Tabulated Votes V. Restricting Citizen Observation & Access to Public Documents A. Warren County Lockdown B. Restricting Citizen Access to Election Records VI. What Went Wrong with the Recounts/Investigation of Vote Irregularities A. Chain of Custody of Voting Machines & Materials Violated B. Failure to Follow Established Procedures for Recounts C. Failure to Allow Recount Observers to Fully Examine Materials D. Secretary of State Blackwell has Failed to Answer Questions VII. Recount Reveals Significant Problems VIII. Methods of Election Fraud A. Stuffing the Ballot Box B. Touchscreen voting machines appear to have been set to “Bush” as Default C. Computers pre-programmed to ‘adjust’ vote count in Bush’s favor? D. Tampering with the Tabulators: Evidence of Hacking in Real-Time? IX. Additional Observations A. Irregular/Impossible Changes in Exit Polls over time on Election Night I.
    [Show full text]