DOCSLIB.ORG

CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results As of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results As of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 2, 2004 Results as of 03/24/2004 Certified Election Results PRECINCTS COUNTED - TOTAL Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Reg/Turnout Percentage REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 45,734 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 18,027 39.42% BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRATIC 7,330 16.03% BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 9,031 19.75% BALLOTS CAST - AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 228 0.50% BALLOTS CAST - GREEN 29 0.06% BALLOTS CAST - LIBERTARIAN 43 0.09% BALLOTS CAST - NATURAL LAW 6 0.01% BALLOTS CAST - PEACE AND FREEDOM 2 0.00% BALLOTS CAST - DEM DECLINE TO STATE 119 0.26% BALLOTS CAST - REP DECLINE TO STATE 95 0.21% BALLOTS CAST - AI DECLINE TO STATE 17 0.04% BALLOTS CAST - NONPARTISAN 1,127 2.46% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DEMOCRAT AND DECLINE TO STATE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F. KERRY 4,280 63.54% JOHN EDWARDS 1,616 23.99% HOWARD DEAN 276 4.10% JOE LIEBERMAN 122 1.81% CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN 120 1.78% AL SHARPTON 102 1.51% WESLEY CLARK 86 1.28% DICK GEPHARDT 62 0.92% DENNIS J. KUCINICH 55 0.82% LYNDON LAROUCHE 17 0.25% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F. KERRY 4,219 63.68% JOHN EDWARDS 1,578 23.82% HOWARD DEAN 271 4.09% JOE LIEBERMAN 122 1.84% CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN 118 1.78% AL SHARPTON 101 1.52% WESLEY CLARK 86 1.30% DICK GEPHARDT 62 0.94% DENNIS J. KUCINICH 51 0.77% LYNDON LAROUCHE 17 0.26% PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE DECLINE TO STATE VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JOHN F. KERRY 61 54.95% JOHN EDWARDS 38 34.23% HOWARD DEAN 5 4.50% DENNIS J. KUCINICH 4 3.60% CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN 2 1.80% AL SHARPTON 1 0.90% DICK GEPHARDT 0 0.00% LYNDON LAROUCHE 0 0.00% JOE LIEBERMAN 0 0.00% WESLEY CLARK 0 0.00% UNITED STATES SENATOR DEMOCRAT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BARBARA BOXER 5,864 100.00% UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, 20TH DISTRICT DEMOCRAT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JIM COSTA 5,109 72.75% LISA QUIGLEY 1,914 27.25% MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, 30TH DISTRICT DEMOCRAT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage NICOLE M. PARRA 6,045 100.00% REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage GEORGE W. BUSH 8,109 100.00% UNITED STATES SENATOR REPUBLICAN Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BILL JONES 6,589 79.93% ROSARIO MARIN 420 5.10% HOWARD KALOOGIAN 241 2.92% TONI CASEY 214 2.60% TIM STOEN 206 2.50% BARRY L. HATCH 156 1.89% JAMES STEWART 144 1.75% JOHN M. VAN ZANDT 110 1.33% BILL QURAISHI 96 1.16% DANNEY BALL 67 0.81% UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, 20TH DISTRICT REPUBLICAN Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage ROY ASHBURN 5,851 76.23% GINO L. MARTORANA 1,824 23.77% MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, 30TH DISTRICT REPUBLICAN Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage DEAN GARDNER 7,875 100.00% PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY AMERICAN INDEP AND DECLINE TO STATE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage MICHAEL A. PEROUTKA 64 100.00% PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY AMERICAN INDEPENDENT VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage MICHAEL A. PEROUTKA 57 100.00% PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DECLINE TO STATE VOTERS ONLY Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage MICHAEL A. PEROUTKA 7 100.00% UNITED STATES SENATOR AMERICAN INDEPENDENT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage DON J. GRUNDMANN 79 100.00% GREEN PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO 15 75.00% DAVID COBB 2 10.00% KENT MESPLAY 2 10.00% LORNA SALZMAN 1 5.00% LIBERTARIAN PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage GARY NOLAN 13 44.83% AARON RUSSO 10 34.48% MICHAEL BADNARIK 6 20.69% UNITED STATES SENATOR LIBERTARIAN Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JAMES P. "JIM" GRAY 22 62.86% GAIL K. LIGHTFOOT 13 37.14% PEACE AND FREEDOM PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage WALTER F. "WALT" BROWN 1 100.00% LEONARD PELTIER 0 0.00% UNITED STATES SENATOR PEACE AND FREEDOM Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage MARSHA FEINLAND 2 100.00% COUNTY SUPERVISOR, 2ND DISTRICT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 17 of 17 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage JON RACHFORD 1,110 52.71% JESS M. GARCIA 996 47.29% COUNTY SUPERVISOR, 5TH DISTRICT Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 33 of 33 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage ALENE TAYLOR 2,731 70.88% RAPHAEL "RALPH" MENDOZA 1,122 29.12% PROPOSITION 55 Education Facilities Bond Act Of 2004 Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage NO 9,554 55.86% YES 7,549 44.14% PROPOSITION 56 State Budget 55 Pct Vote Cons Amendment Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage NO 12,288 70.26% YES 5,201 29.74% PROPOSITION 57 Economic Recovery Bond Act Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage YES 10,766 61.32% NO 6,792 38.68% PROPOSITION 58 California Balanced Budget Act Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage YES 12,168 69.76% NO 5,274 30.24% MEASURE N College Of Sequoias District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 90 of 90 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS YES 6,828 56.01% BONDS NO 5,363 43.99% MEASURE K Lemoore Union School District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 15 of 15 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS NO 1,729 50.39% BONDS YES 1,702 49.61% MEASURE Q Tulare Union High School District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 1 of 1 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS YES 10 71.43% BONDS NO 4 28.57% MEASURE R Kingsburg Elementary School District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 2 of 2 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS YES 98 56.98% BONDS NO 74 43.02% MEASURE S Armona Elementary School District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 8 of 8 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS YES 534 64.18% BONDS NO 298 35.82% MEASURE S Traver Elementary School District Bond Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 1 of 1 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage BONDS NO 8 72.73% BONDS YES 3 27.27% MEASURE A Establish Director Of Finance & Consolidation Vote For: 1 Completed Precincts: 132 of 132 Candidate Name Vote Count Percentage YES 11,227 66.05% NO 5,771 33.95% .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA
    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA Saturday Morning - 6/5/04 Delegate Orientation Ellen Maisen: Review of consensus-seeking process Reminder of why we seek consensus vs. simply voting: Voting creates factions, while consensus builds community spirit. Facilitators: Magali Offerman, Jim Shannon Notes: Adrienne Prince and Don Eichelberger (alt.) Vibes: Leslie Dinkin, Don Eichelberger Time Keeper: Ed Duliba Confirming of Agenda Ratification of minutes, discussion of electoral reform, and platform plank have all been moved to Sunday. Time-sensitive agenda items were given priority. Consent Calendar Jo Chamberlain, SMC: Media bylaws concerns will also be discussed Sunday a.m. Clarification on “point of process” for Consent Calendar: when concerns are brought up, the item in question becomes dropped from the calendar and can be brought up for discussion and voting later in the plenary as time allows. I. GPUS Post-First-Round Ballot Voting Instructions Proposal - Nanette Pratini, Jonathan Lundell, Jim Stauffer Regarding convention delegate voting procedure: “If a delegate’s assigned candidate withdraws from the race or if subsequent votes are required…delegates will vote using their best judgment…as to what the voters who selected their assigned candidate would choose.” Floor rules in process of being approved by national CC. Will be conducted as a series of rounds, announced state by state. For first round, delegates are tied to the candidates as represented in the primary. If someone wins and does not want to accept the vote, subsequent rounds will vote. If a willing candidate gets a majority, they will be nominated, If “no candidate” (an option) wins, there will be an IRV election for an endorsement instead of a nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign
    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Primary Election Results Summary
    03/02/2004 Consolidated Primary Election Results - Sonoma County Page 1 of 18 Sonoma County Consolidated Primary Election March 2, 2004 Final Official Canvass PRESIDENT DEM Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage John F Kerry 48,667 62.6% John Edwards 14,118 18.2% Dennis J Kucinich 6,881 8.8% Howard Dean 3,427 4.4% Wesley Clark 1,730 2.2% Joe Lieberman 921 1.2% Al Sharpton 601 0.8% Carol Moseley Braun 583 0.7% Dick Gephardt 388 0.5% Write-in candidate(s) 350 0.5% Lyndon LaRouche 111 0.1% PRESIDENT REP Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage George W Bush 32,813 94.4% Write-in candidate(s) 1,945 5.6% PRESIDENT AI Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage Michael A Peroutka 562 69.0% Write-in candidate(s) 252 31.0% PRESIDENT GRN Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 03/02/2004 Consolidated Primary Election Results - Sonoma County Page 2 of 18 Vote Count Percentage Peter Miguel Camejo 2,087 73.8% Lorna Salzman 307 10.9% Write-in candidate(s) 203 7.2% David Cobb 197 7.0% Kent Mesplay 34 1.2% PRESIDENT LIB Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage Gary Nolan 330 54.0% Aaron Russo 141 23.1% Michael Badnarik 101 16.5% Write-in candidate(s) 39 6.4% PRESIDENT NAT Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage Write-in candidate(s) 25 100.0% NO CANDIDATE HAS FILED 0 0.0% PRESIDENT PF Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage Leonard Peltier 147 62.8% Walter F Brown 67 28.6% Write-in candidate(s) 20 8.5% PRESIDENT DEM DTS Completed Precincts: 454 of 454 Vote Count Percentage John F
    [Show full text]
  • Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General
    Mimi Newton, Sacramento GA Note- Taker GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA June 2017 General Assembly Minutes Sacramento, June 17-18, 2017 ATTENDEES: Name County Sacramento Delegate status Present/Absent Brett Dixon Alameda Delegate P Greg Jan Alameda Delegate P James McFadden Alameda Not delegate P Jan Arnold Alameda Delegate P Laura Wells Alameda Delegate P Maxine Daniel Alameda Delegate P Michael Rubin Alameda Delegate P Pam Spevack Alameda Delegate P Paul Rea Alameda Delegate P Phoebe Sorgen Alameda Delegate P Erik Rydberg Butte Delegate P Bert Heuer Contra Costa Not delegate P Brian Deckman Contra Costa Not delegate P Meleiza Figueroa Contra Costa Not delegate P Tim Laidman Contra Costa Delegate P Megan Buckingham Fresno Delegate P David Cobb Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Jim Smith Humboldt Delegate P Kelsey Reedy Humboldt Not delegate P Kyle Dust Humboldt Delegate P Matt Smith-Caggiano Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Cassidy Sheppard Kern Delegate P Penny Sheppard Kern Delegate P Ajay Rai Los Angeles Delegate P Andrea Houtman Los Angeles Not delegate P Angel Orellana Los Angeles Delegate P Angelina Saucedo Los Angeles Delegate P Cesar Gonzalez Los Angeles Not delegate P Christopher Cruz Los Angeles Delegate P Daniel Mata Los Angeles Delegate P Doug Barnett Los Angeles Delegate P Fernando Ramirez Los Angeles Delegate P James Lauderdale Los Angeles Not delegate P Jimmy Rivera Los Angeles Delegate P Kenneth Mejia Los Angeles Delegate P Lisa Salvary Los Angeles Delegate P Liz Solis Los Angeles Delegate P Marla Bernstein Los Angeles Delegate P Martin Conway
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Green Party Platform
    Platform 2010 Green Party of the United States As Adopted by the Green National Committee September 2010 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004
    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004 I. Voter Suppression A. Overly Restrictive Registration Requirements B. Incompetence in Processing Registrations C. Challenges to New Registrants on Insufficient Grounds D. Misinformation About Voting Status/Location/Date E. Voter Intimidation F. Voting Machine Shortages/Malfunctions G. Overly Restrictive Rules & Incorrect Procedure Regarding Provisional Ballots H. Poorly Designed Absentee Ballots Caused Voters to Mark Incorrect Candidate II. Access to Voting Systems Before Election Violates Protocol III. A Third-Rate Burglary in Toledo IV. Suspect Results A. Registration Irregularities B. Exceptionally High Voter Turnout C. More Votes than Voters D. Exceptionally High Rates of Undervotes E. High Rate of Overvotes Due to Ballots Pre-Punched for Bush? F. The Kerry/Connally Discrepancy G. Discrepancy between Exit Polls & Tabulated Votes V. Restricting Citizen Observation & Access to Public Documents A. Warren County Lockdown B. Restricting Citizen Access to Election Records VI. What Went Wrong with the Recounts/Investigation of Vote Irregularities A. Chain of Custody of Voting Machines & Materials Violated B. Failure to Follow Established Procedures for Recounts C. Failure to Allow Recount Observers to Fully Examine Materials D. Secretary of State Blackwell has Failed to Answer Questions VII. Recount Reveals Significant Problems VIII. Methods of Election Fraud A. Stuffing the Ballot Box B. Touchscreen voting machines appear to have been set to “Bush” as Default C. Computers pre-programmed to ‘adjust’ vote count in Bush’s favor? D. Tampering with the Tabulators: Evidence of Hacking in Real-Time? IX. Additional Observations A. Irregular/Impossible Changes in Exit Polls over time on Election Night I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010:Frntpgs 2004.Qxd 6/21/2010 4:57 PM Page Ai
    frntpgs_2010:frntpgs_2004.qxd 6/21/2010 4:57 PM Page Ai Archdiocese of Indianapolis The Church in Central and Southern Indiana ✜ Secretariats, Vicariates, Agencies, Offices, Departments, and Programs ✜ Archbishop Edward T. O’Meara Catholic Center 1400 N. Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2367 P.O. Box 1410, Indianapolis, IN 46206-1410 317-236-1400 1-800-382-9836 Web site: www.archindy.org ROOM NO. TELEPHONE NO. A Promise to Keep (APTK) (Catholic Center) ................................314 317-236-1478 Accounting Services, Offices of (Catholic Center) ........................209 317-236-1410 Adult Day Services .............................................................................. 317-466-0015 4609 N. Capitol Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46208 Archbishop, Office of (Catholic Center)..........................................319 317-236-1403 Archdiocesan Directory and Yearbook (Catholic Center) ..............207 317-236-1587 Archives (Xavier Building)......................................................3rd Floor 317-236-1429 Birthline Crisis Hotline.......................................................................... 317-635-4808 Building Commission, Archdiocesan (Catholic Center)..................104 317-236-1452 Campaign for Human Development, Catholic The (Catholic Center) ..................................................................319 317-236-1571 Catholic Charities and Family Ministries, Secretariat for (Catholic Center)..................................................319 317-236-7325 Catholic Charities Bloomington
    [Show full text]
  • Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines
    CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A multi-disciplinary, collaborative project of the California Institute of Technology – Pasadena, California 91125 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 AUDITING TECHNOLOGY FOR ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES Sharon B. Cohen MIT Key words: DRE, voting machine security, electronic voting, electronic voting machines, auditing technology VTP WORKING PAPER #46 May 2005 Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Engineering and Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 19, 2005 Copyright 2005 Sharon B. Cohen. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis and to grant others the right to do so. Author_________________________________________________________________ Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 19, 2005 Certified by___________________________________________________________ Ted Selker Thesis Supervisor Accepted by____________________________________________________________ Arthur C. Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Republic Magazine Issue 3
    Republic Magazine Issue 3 www.republicmagazine.com 1 Republic Publishing, LLC PO Box 10577 Newport Beach, CA 92658 tel: 714.436.1234 or 866.437.6570 fax: 714.455.2091 Volume I Issue 3 Publisher In This Issue George Shepherd Duty, Honor, Country 2007 Managing Editor An Open Letter to the New Generation of Military Officers Gary Franchi Serving and Protecting Our Nation Design/Layout Manager By Dr. Bob Bowman 4 Samuel Anthony Ettaro Constitiutional 6 Copy Editor Discipline Glenn Craven Militia By Michael Badnarik Contributing Writers Property of We The People 7 Jack Blood By Mark Gregory Keornke Michael Badnarik 10 Preserving the Mark Gregory Keornke 4th Estate Samuel Anthony Ettaro Barie Zwicker We Are The Media. G. Edward Griffin Salute to By Jack Blood Gary Franchi Aaron Russo Jelena Zanko Larry R. Bradley 18 By G. Edward Griffin George Shepherd Perspective Making alternative energies Advertising mainstream choices. George Shepherd Toll Free: 866.437.6570 By Samuel Anthony Ettaro email: 23 george @republicmagazine.com Interview A Discussion With Louder Constitutional Red Alert! Subscriptions/Bulk Than Words House passes Activist Orders By Jelena Zanko 25 www.republicmagazine.com 20 By Lee Rogers or call: 866.437.6570 Mail-In Orders When Your Party PO Box 10577 We Were Born 28 Fails You Newport Beach, CA 92658 30 Kings By Larry Bradley Cover Design By Samuel Anthony Ettaro By George Shepherd Republic Magazine is Published Bi-Monthly Publisher’s Disclaimer: The Republic Magazine staff and Republic Publishing, LLC have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the infor- Advertise Your Business mation presented within these pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Becket Fx: 413-623-6036
    557 Main Street, Becket, MA 01223 ph: 413-623-8934 Town of Becket fx: 413-623-6036 Presidential Primary Minutes 3/2/04 Pursuant to the foregoing warrant, the PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY was held at the Becket Town Hall on March 2, 2004, from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Prior to opening, the Ballot Box was publicly opened, examined and found to be empty; the register was set at zero. The polls opened at 7:00 a.m. Results of the votes for the candidates of political parties are as follows: DEMOCRATIC VOTES Presidential Preference Blanks 0 Richard Gephardt 0 Joseph Lieberman 2 Wesley K. Clark 0 Howard Dean 17 Carol Moseley Braun 0 John Edwards 17 Dennis J. Kucinich 12 John F. Kerry 70 Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. 0 Al Sharpton 0 NO PREFERENCE 0 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 118 State Committee Man Blanks 17 Peter G. Arlos 50 Matt L. Barron 51 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 118 State Committee Woman Blanks 38 Margaret Johnson Ware 80 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 118 Town Committee Blanks 3565 Albert Barvenik 58 Francis E. Barvenik 57 Giles (Gil) T. Falcone 71 Jane P. Falcone 65 Joan Samuels Kaiser 64 Judith A. Loeb 64 James Soluri 59 Sally M. Soluri 59 Maryellen D. Lake 65 Write Ins: 3 TOTAL VOTES 4130 (Town Committee) Group Blanks 64 GROUP 54 TOTAL VOTES 118 REPUBLICAN VOTES Presidential Preference Blanks 0 George W. Bush 6 NO PREFERENCE 1 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 7 State Committee Man Blanks 7 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 7 State Committee Woman Blanks 7 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 7 Town Committee Blanks 70 Write Ins: 0 TOTAL VOTES 70 GREEN-RAINBOW VOTES Presidential Preference
    [Show full text]
  • Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Ballot–Lincoln County, Oregon November 2, 2010
    Official Ballot - Lincoln County, OR - November 2, 2010 A B C Official Ballot - LincolnInstructions County, ORTo Voter - November 2, 2010 A B C Use A Pencil or Pen State Nonpartisan County 11 (Blue or Black Ink) Instructions To Voter Use A Pencil or Pen To ensure your vote counts, completely fill in the 11 State NonpartisanGovernor County Lincoln County Clerk (Blue or Black Ink) oval R to the left of the response of your Vote For One Four Year Term choice. Vote For One To ensure your vote counts, completely fill in the Governor Lincoln County Clerk oval R to the left of the response of your To write in a name, writeVote the name For One on the solid Four Year Term choice. line and fill in the oval R to the left of the John KitzhaberVote For One Dana W Jenkins write-in line. DEM, IND To write in a name, write the name on the solid Attention! line and fill in the oval R to the left of the Official Ballot - LincolnGreg County, Kord OR - November 2, 2010 RememberJohn to inspect Kitzhaber your ballot for Dana W Jenkins Write-in write-in line. DEM, IND CON Amistakes! If you make a mistake or B C Lincoln County Soil and Water Attention! 21 Wes Wagner damage yourGreg ballot, Kord call your County Conservation District Remember to inspect your ballot for Elections OfficeInstructionsCON to ask for To a Voter replacement LBTWrite-in mistakes! If you make a mistake or ballot. Use A Pencil or Pen ChrisLincoln Dudley CountyState Soil and Water NonpartisanDirector, Zone County 1 21 damage your ballot, call your County11 (BlueWes Wagner or Black Ink) LBT REP Conservation District Four Year Term Elections Office to ask for a replacement Vote For One ballot.
    [Show full text]