Federal Elections 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Elections 2004 2004 ELECTION RESULTS The following four sections present the primary, runoff and general election results for the U.S. Presidential and U.S. Congressional elections held in 2004. The November 2004 general election (and Louisiana’s December 2004 runoff election) resulted in the election of the 109th Congress. The following is the party composition of the 109th Congress, as determined by the results of these elections: U.S. Senate Republicans: 55 Democrats: 44 Independents: 1 U.S. House of Representatives Republicans: 232 Democrats: 202 Independents: 1 Notes on Charts * Runoff election vote totals have been included with the primary election totals. (For the U.S. Senate, runoff elections were held in Georgia and South Carolina. For the U.S. House of Representatives, runoff elections were held in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas.) For Louisiana, runoff election vote totals have been included with the general election totals. The following three situations account for blank spaces in the charts and should be considered when making comparisons or drawing conclusions about the vote totals. * In some states, i.e., Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, political parties may nominate general election candidates by party convention, rather than by primary election. * In some states, there were unopposed candidates whose names did not appear on a ballot and therefore received no votes. * 34 states had regularly scheduled U.S. Senate elections in 2004. 2004 PRESIDENTIAL POPULAR VOTE SUMMARY FOR ALL CANDIDATES LISTED ON AT LEAST ONE STATE BALLOT Candidate (Party Label) Popular Vote Total Percent of Popular Vote George W. Bush (Republican) 62,040,610 50.73% John F. Kerry (Democrat) 59,028,444 48.27% Ralph Nader (Reform/Populist/Independent) 465,650 0.38% Michael Badnarik (Libertarian) 397,265 0.32% Michael Anthony Peroutka (Constitution) 143,630 0.12% David Cobb (Green) 119,859 0.10% Write-In (Miscellaneous) 37,240 0.03% Leonard Peltier (Peace and Freedom) 27,607 0.02% Walter F. Brown (Socialist/Natural Law) 10,837 0.01% James Harris (Socialist Workers) 7,102 0.01% Róger Calero (Socialist Workers) 3,689 0.00% None of These Candidates (Nevada) 3,688 0.00% Thomas J. Harens (Christian Freedom) 2,387 0.00% Gene Amondson (Concerns of People/Prohibition) 1,944 0.00% Bill Van Auken (Socialist Equality) 1,857 0.00% John Parker (Workers World/Liberty Union) 1,646 0.00% Charles Jay (Personal Choice) 946 0.00% Stanford E. (Andy) Andress (Unaffiliated) 804 0.00% Earl F. Dodge (Prohibition) 140 0.00% Total: 122,295,345* U.S. Census Bureau Voting Age Population (Current Population Survey for November 2004): 215,694,000 Percentage of Voting Age Population casting a vote for President: 56.70% Notes: Party designations vary from one state to another. Vote totals for the candidates listed above include any write-in votes they received. * Totals do not include the 57,230 miscellaneous write-in, blank and void votes that were compiled as one total in New York. -5- 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL AND POPULAR VOTE STATE ELECTORAL VOTE POPULAR VOTE Bush (R) Kerry (D) Bush (R) Kerry (D) All Others Total Vote AL 9 1,176,394 693,933 13,122 1,883,449 AK 3 190,889 111,025 10,684 312,598 AZ 10 1,104,294 893,524 14,767 2,012,585 AR 6 572,898 469,953 12,094 1,054,945 CA 55 5,509,826 6,745,485 166,541 12,421,852 CO 9 1,101,255 1,001,732 27,343 2,130,330 CT 7 693,826 857,488 27,455 1,578,769 DE 3 171,660 200,152 3,378 375,190 DC 3 21,256 202,970 3,360 227,586 FL 27 3,964,522 3,583,544 61,744 7,609,810 GA 15 1,914,254 1,366,149 21,472 3,301,875 HI 4 194,191 231,708 3,114 429,013 ID 4 409,235 181,098 8,114 598,447 IL 21 2,345,946 2,891,550 36,826 5,274,322 IN 11 1,479,438 969,011 19,553 2,468,002 IA 7 751,957 741,898 13,053 1,506,908 KS 6 736,456 434,993 16,307 1,187,756 KY 8 1,069,439 712,733 13,710 1,795,882 LA 9 1,102,169 820,299 20,638 1,943,106 ME 4 330,201 396,842 13,709 740,752 MD 10 1,024,703 1,334,493 27,482 2,386,678 MA 12 1,071,109 1,803,800 37,479 2,912,388 MI 17 2,313,746 2,479,183 46,323 4,839,252 MN 9* 1,346,695 1,445,014 36,678 2,828,387 MS 6 684,981 458,094 9,070 1,152,145 MO 11 1,455,713 1,259,171 16,480 2,731,364 MT 3 266,063 173,710 10,672 450,445 NE 5 512,814 254,328 11,044 778,186 NV 5 418,690 397,190 13,707 829,587 NH 4 331,237 340,511 5,990 677,738 NJ 15 1,670,003 1,911,430 30,258 3,611,691 NM 5 376,930 370,942 8,432 756,304 NY 31 2,962,567 4,314,280 114,189 7,391,036 NC 15 1,961,166 1,525,849 13,992 3,501,007 ND 3 196,651 111,052 5,130 312,833 OH 20 2,859,768 2,741,167 26,973 5,627,908 OK 7 959,792 503,966 0 1,463,758 OR 7 866,831 943,163 26,788 1,836,782 PA 21 2,793,847 2,938,095 37,648 5,769,590 RI 4 169,046 259,765 8,323 437,134 SC 8 937,974 661,699 18,057 1,617,730 SD 3 232,584 149,244 6,387 388,215 TN 11 1,384,375 1,036,477 16,467 2,437,319 TX 34 4,526,917 2,832,704 51,144 7,410,765 UT 5 663,742 241,199 22,903 927,844 VT 3 121,180 184,067 7,062 312,309 VA 13 1,716,959 1,454,742 26,666 3,198,367 WA 11 1,304,894 1,510,201 43,989 2,859,084 WV 5 423,778 326,541 5,568 755,887 WI 10 1,478,120 1,489,504 29,383 2,997,007 WY 3 167,629 70,776 5,023 243,428 Total: 286 251* 62,040,610 59,028,444 1,226,291 122,295,345 50.73% 48.27% 1.00% * MN has 10 Electoral Votes. One electoral vote was cast for John Edwards. Total Electoral Vote = 538. Total Electoral Vote Needed to Win = 270. -6- 2004 GENERAL ELECTION VOTES CAST FOR U.S. PRESIDENT, SENATE AND HOUSE State Presidential Vote U.S. Senate Vote U.S. House Vote AL 1,883,449 1,839,066 1,792,759 AK 312,598 308,315 299,996 AS 12,128 AZ 2,012,585 1,961,677 1,871,445 AR 1,054,945 1,039,349 791,240 CA 12,421,852 12,053,295 11,623,753 CO 2,130,330 2,107,554 2,039,011 CT 1,578,769 1,424,726 1,428,738 DE 375,190 356,045 DC 227,586 221,213 FL 7,609,810 7,429,894 5,627,494 GA 3,301,875 3,200,981 2,960,763 GU 31,888 HI 429,013 415,347 416,570 ID 598,447 503,932 572,426 IL 5,274,322 5,141,520 4,988,665 IN 2,468,002 2,428,233 2,416,251 IA 1,506,908 1,479,228 1,458,161 KS 1,187,756 1,129,022 1,156,383 KY 1,795,882 1,724,362 1,635,243 LA 1,943,106 1,848,056 1,797,167 ME 740,752 710,176 MD 2,386,678 2,323,183 2,255,955 MA 2,912,388 2,580,955 MI 4,839,252 4,631,058 MN 2,828,387 2,721,681 MS 1,152,145 1,116,203 MO 2,731,364 2,706,402 2,667,023 MT 450,445 444,230 NE 778,186 764,972 NV 829,587 810,068 791,433 NH 677,738 657,086 651,566 NJ 3,611,691 3,284,595 NM 756,304 742,899 NY 7,391,036 6,702,875 6,222,418 NC 3,501,007 3,472,082 3,413,071 ND 312,833 310,696 310,814 OH 5,627,908 5,426,196 5,183,508 OK 1,463,758 1,446,846 1,374,610 OR 1,836,782 1,780,550 1,772,306 PA 5,769,590 5,559,105 5,152,274 PR 1,959,553 RI 437,134 402,175 SC 1,617,730 1,597,221 1,439,118 SD 388,215 391,188 389,468 TN 2,437,319 2,218,738 TX 7,410,765 6,958,603 UT 927,844 911,726 908,857 VT 312,309 307,208 305,008 VI 26,931 VA 3,198,367 3,004,007 WA 2,859,084 2,818,651 2,729,995 WV 755,887 721,656 WI 2,997,007 2,949,743 2,821,613 WY 243,428 239,034 Total: 122,295,345 86,205,383 114,413,842 -7- 2004 GENERAL ELECTION VOTES CAST BY PARTY (U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Poll Results
    March 13, 2006 October 24 , 2008 National Public Radio The Final Weeks of the Campaign October 23, 2008 1,000 Likely Voters Presidential Battleground States in the presidential battleground: blue and red states Total State List BLUE STATES RED STATES Colorado Minnesota Colorado Florida Wisconsin Florida Indiana Michigan Iowa Iowa New Hampshire Missouri Michigan Pennsylvania Nevada Missouri New Mexico Minnesota Ohio Nevada Virginia New Hampshire Indiana New Mexico North Carolina North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia Wisconsin National Public Radio, October 2008 Battleground Landscape National Public Radio, October 2008 ‘Wrong track’ in presidential battleground high Generally speaking, do you think things in the country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten pretty seriously off on the Right direction Wrong track wrong track? 82 80 75 17 13 14 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Net -58 -69 -66 Difference *Note: The September 20, 2008, survey did not include Indiana, though it was included for both the August and October waves.Page 4 Data | Greenberg from National Quinlan Public Rosner National Public Radio, October 2008 Radio Presidential Battleground surveys over the past three months. Two thirds of voters in battleground disapprove of George Bush Do you approve or disapprove of the way George Bush is handling his job as president? Approve Disapprove 64 66 61 35 32 30 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Net -26 -32 -36 Difference *Note: The September 20, 2008, survey did not include Indiana, though it was included for both the August and October waves.Page 5 Data | Greenberg from National Quinlan Public Rosner National Public Radio, October 2008 Radio Presidential Battleground surveys over the past three months.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Katie Reich
    THE M NARCH Volume 18 Number 1 • Serving the Archbishop Mitty Community • Oct 2008 Remembering Katie Reich Teacher, Mentor, Coach, Friend Katie Hatch Reich, beloved Biology and Environmental Science teacher and cross-country coach, was diagnosed with melanoma on April 1, 2008. She passed away peacefully at home on October 3, 2008. While the Mitty community mourns the loss of this loving teacher, coach, and friend, they also look back in remembrance on the profound infl uence Ms. Reich’s life had on them. “Katie’s passions were apparent to all “We have lost an angel on our campus. “My entire sophomore year, I don’t think “Every new teacher should be blessed to who knew her in the way she spoke, her Katie Reich was an inspiration and a mentor I ever saw Ms. Reich not smiling. Even after have a teacher like Katie Reich to learn from. hobbies, even her key chains. Her personal to many of our students. What bothers me is she was diagnosed with cancer, I remember Her mind was always working to improve key chain had a beetle that had been encased the fact that so many of our future students her coming back to class one day, jumping up lessons and try new things. She would do in acrylic. I recall her enthusiasm for it and will never have the opportunity to learn on her desk, crossing her legs like a little kid anything to help students understand biology wonder as she asked me, “Isn’t it beautiful?!” about biology, learn about our earth, or learn and asking us, “Hey! Anyone got any questions because she knew that only then could she On her work keys, Katie had typed up her about life from this amazing person.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 5. Michał Rzepecki, Amerykańskie Prawybory Prezydenckie
    Biuletyn Międzynarodowy Instytutu Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Redakcja: Piotr Bajor (red. naczelny), Olga Plaze, Patrycja Lipold Opiekun naukowy: dr hab. Michał Chorośnicki, prof. UJ. Kontakt: ul. Jabłonkowskich 5, 31-007 Kraków e-mail: [email protected] Nr 5 (5), luty 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michał Rzepecki Amerykańskie prawybory prezydenckie W 2008 roku w wielu państwach świata odbędą się wybory, które często będą miały duże znaczenie dla sytuacji politycznej w danym regionie. Jednak nigdzie indziej, tak jak w Stanach Zjednoczonych, od wyników wyborów nie zależy tak wiele. Ich wynik będzie miał wpływ nie tylko na to, którą drogą podążać będzie Ameryka, ale także na wydarzenia w skali globalnej. Od tego, kto zostanie nowym gospodarzem Białego Domu – przywódcą jedynego światowego mocarstwa – uwarunkowane są losy całego świata. W świetle konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych kandydat na prezydenta musi być obywatelem amerykańskim urodzonym w Stanach, mieć ukończone 35 lat i mieszkać, od co najmniej 14 lat na terenie USA. Takie same wymagania dotyczą także kandydata na wiceprezydenta. Co więcej nie może on pochodzić z tego samego stanu co kandydat na prezydenta. Prezydent USA wybierany jest w wyborach pośrednich. Data wyborów przypada zawsze w pierwszy wtorek, po pierwszym poniedziałku listopada. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • PL&B International Issue
    Issue 132 December 2014 Ten ways the US election may NEWS 2 - Comment affect privacy law in 2015 Watch this space for US and EU privacy When Republicans take over the US Senate in January, the legislation priorities of committees overseeing privacy and data security 4 - HP dual BCR and CBPR certification issues will change significantly. By Jeff Kosseff . 5 - EU DP draft Regulation: The final n January, Republicans will con - in committee and on the Senate floor. round in 2015? trol both houses of Congress. Below are ten of the key privacy 7-EU contractual clauses to become But we shouldn’t expect an and data security trends to watch in easier to use • Central/East European Iimmediate sea-change in privacy the next Congress. guide on employee data laws. Although Republicans will 17 - CNIL reorganises and issues insurance industry compliance pack have a majority of votes in the Senate `e^kdb fk qlkb lc pbk^qb next year, they will be short of the 60 `ljjbo`b `ljjfqqbb \= 22 - China scrutinises Apple devices for votes necessary to bring a bill to the Retiring Senate Commerce Commit - security flaws floor. Privacy issues generally tend tee Chairman, Jay Rockefeller, 27 - ECJ to rule if IP addresses are not to break neatly along party lines Democrat-West Virginia, has been personal data • DPAs demand transparency from app developers and there will remain bipartisan sup - among the most active senators on port – and bipartisan opposition – to privacy and data security issues. ANALYSIS most initiatives. With a Democrat in Rockefeller has called for regulation 1 - Ten ways the US election may affect the White House, bipartisan support of data brokers, and he is a vocal privacy law in 2015 will be essential for any privacy legis - critic of companies’ privacy and data 13 - Privacy self-regulation in crisis? lation to pass.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA
    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA Saturday Morning - 6/5/04 Delegate Orientation Ellen Maisen: Review of consensus-seeking process Reminder of why we seek consensus vs. simply voting: Voting creates factions, while consensus builds community spirit. Facilitators: Magali Offerman, Jim Shannon Notes: Adrienne Prince and Don Eichelberger (alt.) Vibes: Leslie Dinkin, Don Eichelberger Time Keeper: Ed Duliba Confirming of Agenda Ratification of minutes, discussion of electoral reform, and platform plank have all been moved to Sunday. Time-sensitive agenda items were given priority. Consent Calendar Jo Chamberlain, SMC: Media bylaws concerns will also be discussed Sunday a.m. Clarification on “point of process” for Consent Calendar: when concerns are brought up, the item in question becomes dropped from the calendar and can be brought up for discussion and voting later in the plenary as time allows. I. GPUS Post-First-Round Ballot Voting Instructions Proposal - Nanette Pratini, Jonathan Lundell, Jim Stauffer Regarding convention delegate voting procedure: “If a delegate’s assigned candidate withdraws from the race or if subsequent votes are required…delegates will vote using their best judgment…as to what the voters who selected their assigned candidate would choose.” Floor rules in process of being approved by national CC. Will be conducted as a series of rounds, announced state by state. For first round, delegates are tied to the candidates as represented in the primary. If someone wins and does not want to accept the vote, subsequent rounds will vote. If a willing candidate gets a majority, they will be nominated, If “no candidate” (an option) wins, there will be an IRV election for an endorsement instead of a nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 11-07 General Election
    2000 General Election, Salt Lake County, Utah These results are for Salt Lake County only Summary Information Precincts Counted 688 Number of registered voters 444186 Total ballots cast 312098 70.26% Straight Party Ballots Cast Democrat 46553 46.04% Republican 50225 49.67% Independent American 3509 3.47% Libertarian 504 0.50% Natural Law 183 0.18% Reform 149 0.15% 101123 100% President and Vice President Democrat - Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman 107576 35.01% Republican - George W. Bush and Dick Cheney 171585 55.84% Green - Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke 21252 6.92% Independent American - Howard Phillips and Curtis Frazier 896 0.29% Libertarian - Harry Browne and Art Olivier 1699 0.55% Natural Law - John Hagelin and Nat Goldhaber 388 0.13% Reform - Pat Buchanan and Ezola Foster 3676 1.20% Socialist - James Harris and Margaret Trowe 101 0.03% Unaffiliated - Louie G. Youngkeit and Robert Leo Beck 85 0.03% Write In - Earnest Lee Easton 0 0.00% Write In - Keith Lewis Kunzler 0 0.00% Write In - Forrest C. Labelle 0 0.00% Write In - Daniel J. Pearlman 0 0.00% Write In - Joe Schriner 0 0.00% Write In - Gloria Dawn Strickland 0 0.00% United States Senate Democrat - Scott Howell 130329 42.43% Republican - Orrin G. Hatch 168029 54.70% Independent American - Carlton Edward Bowen 4222 1.37% Libertarian - Jim Dexter 4597 1.50% United States House of Representatives U.S. Representative District 1 Precincts Counted 2 Registered Voters 688 Ballots Cast 319 46.37% Democrat - Kathleen McConkie Collinwood 151 49.51% Republican - James V.
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign
    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Blue Book 2015 - 2016
    WEST VIRGINIA BLUE BOOK 2015 - 2016 Clark S. Barnes, Senate Clerk Charleston, West Virginia II WEST VIRGINIA BLUE BOOK CONTENTS Pages 1-336 Section 1 - Executive State Elective and Appointive Officers; Departmental Registers; Salaries and Terms of Office; Boards and Commissions 337-512 Section 2 - Legislative Rosters of Senate and House of Delegates; Maps, Senatorial and Delegate Districts; Legislative Agencies and Organizations; Historical Information 513-542 Section 3 - Judicial Justices of the State Supreme Court of Appeals; Clerks and Officers; Maps and Registers; Circuit Courts and Family Court Judges; Magistrates 543-628 Section 4 - Constitutional Constitution of the United States; Constitution of West Virginia 629-676 Section 5 - Institutions Correctional Institutions; State Health Facilities; State Schools and Colleges; Denominational and Private Colleges 677-752 Section 6 - Federal President and Cabinet; State Delegation in Congress; Map, Congressional Districts; Governors of States; Federal Courts; Federal Agencies in West Virginia 753-766 Section 7 - Press, Television & Radio, Postal 767-876 Section 8 - Political State Committees; County Chairs; Organizations; Election Returns 877-946 Section 9 - Counties County Register; Historical Information; Statistical Facts and Figures 947-1042 Section 10 - Municpalities Municipal Register; Historical Information; Statistical Facts and Figures 1043-1116 Section 11 - Departmental, Statistical & General Information 1117-1133 Section 12 - Index FOREWORD West Virginia Blue Book 2015 - 2016 The November 2014 election delivered a political surprise. In January the following year, for the first time in over 80 years, the Republicans controlled both Chambers of the State Legislature. New names, new faces dominated the political landscape. William P. Cole, III, a Senator for only two years, bypassed the usual leadership hierarchy and assumed the position of Senate President and Lieutenant Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    1776 Biographical Directory York for a fourteen-year term; died in Bronx, N.Y., Decem- R ber 23, 1974; interment in St. Joseph’s Cemetery, Hacken- sack, N.J. RABAUT, Louis Charles, a Representative from Michi- gan; born in Detroit, Mich., December 5, 1886; attended QUINN, Terence John, a Representative from New parochial schools; graduated from Detroit (Mich.) College, York; born in Albany, Albany County, N.Y., October 16, 1836; educated at a private school and the Boys’ Academy 1909; graduated from Detroit College of Law, 1912; admitted in his native city; early in life entered the brewery business to the bar in 1912 and commenced practice in Detroit; also with his father and subsequently became senior member engaged in the building business; delegate to the Democratic of the firm; at the outbreak of the Civil War was second National Conventions, 1936 and 1940; delegate to the Inter- lieutenant in Company B, Twenty-fifth Regiment, New York parliamentary Union at Oslo, Norway, 1939; elected as a State Militia Volunteers, which was ordered to the defense Democrat to the Seventy-fourth and to the five succeeding of Washington, D.C., in April 1861 and assigned to duty Congresses (January 3, 1935-January 3, 1947); unsuccessful at Arlington Heights; member of the common council of Al- candidate for reelection to the Eightieth Congress in 1946; bany 1869-1872; elected a member of the State assembly elected to the Eighty-first and to the six succeeding Con- in 1873; elected as a Democrat to the Forty-fifth Congress gresses (January 3, 1949-November 12, 1961); died on No- and served from March 4, 1877, until his death in Albany, vember 12, 1961, in Hamtramck, Mich; interment in Mount N.Y., June 18, 1878; interment in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Ballot
    SAMPLE BALLOT SKAGIT COUNTY WA GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2004 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Only use pencil to mark your ballot. PROPOSED TO THE LEGISLATURE STATE STATE 2. You must completely blacken the oval to AND REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE: INITIATIVE TO THE LEGISLATURE 297 the left of your desired selection. Initiative Measure No. 297 concerns GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL "mixed" radioactive and nonradioactive 4 Year Term 4 Year Term 3. To write-in a candidate you must write hazardous waste. This measure would Vote For One Vote For One their name and party on the line provided add new provisions concerning "mixed" under the desired position. radioactive and nonradioactive hazardous waste, requiring cleanup of contamination 4. Do not make any identifying marks on before additional waste is added, Christine Gregoire D Deborah Senn D your ballot. prioritizing cleanup, providing for public participation and enforcement through ABBREVIATION POLITICAL PARTY citizen lawsuits. Dino Rossi R Rob McKenna R D Democratic Should this measure be enacted into law? R Republican L Libertarian Ruth Bennett L J. Bradley Gibson L WW Workers World Yes G Green SW Socialist Workers Paul Richmond G C Constitution No SE Socialist Equality Write-in I Independent Candidate NP Nonpartisan Write-in PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION: FEDERAL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR INITIATIVE TO THE PEOPLE 872 4 Year Term Initiative Measure No. 872 concerns Vote For One elections for partisan offices. This PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS measure would allow voters to select OF THE UNITED STATES 4 Year Term among all candidates in a primary. 4 Year Term Vote For One Ballots would indicate candidates' party Vote For One Brad Owen D preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General
    Mimi Newton, Sacramento GA Note- Taker GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA June 2017 General Assembly Minutes Sacramento, June 17-18, 2017 ATTENDEES: Name County Sacramento Delegate status Present/Absent Brett Dixon Alameda Delegate P Greg Jan Alameda Delegate P James McFadden Alameda Not delegate P Jan Arnold Alameda Delegate P Laura Wells Alameda Delegate P Maxine Daniel Alameda Delegate P Michael Rubin Alameda Delegate P Pam Spevack Alameda Delegate P Paul Rea Alameda Delegate P Phoebe Sorgen Alameda Delegate P Erik Rydberg Butte Delegate P Bert Heuer Contra Costa Not delegate P Brian Deckman Contra Costa Not delegate P Meleiza Figueroa Contra Costa Not delegate P Tim Laidman Contra Costa Delegate P Megan Buckingham Fresno Delegate P David Cobb Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Jim Smith Humboldt Delegate P Kelsey Reedy Humboldt Not delegate P Kyle Dust Humboldt Delegate P Matt Smith-Caggiano Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Cassidy Sheppard Kern Delegate P Penny Sheppard Kern Delegate P Ajay Rai Los Angeles Delegate P Andrea Houtman Los Angeles Not delegate P Angel Orellana Los Angeles Delegate P Angelina Saucedo Los Angeles Delegate P Cesar Gonzalez Los Angeles Not delegate P Christopher Cruz Los Angeles Delegate P Daniel Mata Los Angeles Delegate P Doug Barnett Los Angeles Delegate P Fernando Ramirez Los Angeles Delegate P James Lauderdale Los Angeles Not delegate P Jimmy Rivera Los Angeles Delegate P Kenneth Mejia Los Angeles Delegate P Lisa Salvary Los Angeles Delegate P Liz Solis Los Angeles Delegate P Marla Bernstein Los Angeles Delegate P Martin Conway
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder County, Colorado Registration and Turnout
    Boulder County, Colorado 2004 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION November 2, 2004 Official Results for Election - 11/17/2004 2:15:00 PM Registration and Turnout Completed Precincts: 230 of 230 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 176224 Precinct Ballots Cast 89886 51.0% Early Ballots Cast 42183 23.9% Absentee Ballots Cast 27943 15.9% Total Ballots Cast 160012 90.8% Registration and Turnout Boulder County-All Precincts Completed Precincts: 227 of 227 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 176140 Precinct Ballots Cast 89883 51.0% Early Ballots Cast 42180 23.9% Absentee Ballots Cast 27664 15.7% Total Ballots Cast 159727 90.7% Registration and Turnout City of Lafayette Completed Precincts: 19 of 19 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 13245 Precinct Ballots Cast 6940 52.4% Early Ballots Cast 2729 20.6% Absentee Ballots Cast 2281 17.2% Total Ballots Cast 11950 90.2% Registration and Turnout City of Longmont Completed Precincts: 54 of 54 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 41021 Precinct Ballots Cast 21238 51.8% Early Ballots Cast 8674 21.1% Absentee Ballots Cast 7071 17.2% Total Ballots Cast 36983 90.2% Registration and Turnout City of Louisville Completed Precincts: 18 of 18 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 11849 Precinct Ballots Cast 5010 42.3% Early Ballots Cast 3742 31.6% Absentee Ballots Cast 2201 18.6% Total Ballots Cast 10953 92.4% Registration and Turnout Eldorado Springs Local Improv Dist Completed Precincts: 2 of 2 Reg/Turnout Percentage Total Registered Voters 193 Precinct Ballots Cast
    [Show full text]