DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Sheep and Goat Hunting Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Sheep and Goat Hunting Brochure v COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2014 Colorado Sheep & Goat APPLICATION DEADLINE: APRIL 1 online brochure cpw.state.co.us 2014 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting V COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2014 Colorado aoTHb U T e CoveR: Morgan Sheep & Goat APPLICATION DEADLINE: APRIL 1 Dellinger harvested this large nanny mountain goat — with Cwfp of I e loCaTIons horns longer than 10 inches — cpw.state.co.us on a hunt with her father. ONL Y the offices below can assist hunters with animal checks and taking samples that are Photo © CPW Hunter Testimonials. related to hunting activities. See the CPW website for a complete list of our 42 parks loca- tions that can also sell licenses, issue duplicate licenses and accept licenses for refunds. Other photos, left to right: online brochure 1. Ronna Dellinger waited 26 years cpw.state.co.us BrusH granD jUnCTIon MonTRose for her bighorn sheep tag. Photo © CPW Hunter 122 E. Edison 711 Independent Ave. 2300 S. Townsend Ave. Testimonials. Brush, 80723 Grand Junction, 81505 Montrose, 81401 2. Mountain goat near St. Louis Lake. Photo by © CPW. (970) 842-6300 (970) 255-6100 (970) 252-6000 3. Desert bighorn sheep near Grand Junction. Photo ColoRaDo spRInGs GUnnIson pUeblo by © Kellen Keisling, CPW. 4255 Sinton Road 300 W. New York Ave. 600 Reservoir Road 4. Chris Miller’s son was with him on the hunt when Colorado Springs, 80907 Gunnison, 81230 Pueblo, 81005 Chris harvested this bighorn ram in the Sangre (719) 227-5200 (970) 641-7060 (719) 561-5300 De Cristo mountains. Photo by Chris Miller © CPW HoT sUlpHUR spRInGs salIDa Hunter Testimonials. DenveR 6060 Broadway 346 Grand County Rd. 362 7405 Hwy. 50 Denver, 80216 Hot Sulphur Springs, 80451 Salida, 81201 Read Morgan’s story and share your own big- (303) 291-7227 (970) 725-6200 (719) 530-5520 game hunt photos with us at cpw.state.co.us/ laMaR sh/testimonial. We may use yours in print! DURanGo sTeaMboaT spRInGs 151 E. 16th St. 2500 S. Main St. 925 Weiss Dr. Durango, 81301 Lamar, 81052 Steamboat Springs, 80487 (970) 247-0855 (719) 336-6600 (970) 870-2197 Table of ConTenTs foRT CollIns MeekeR l icense fees & Information .......................... 1 317 W. Prospect Road 73485 Hwy. 64 Fort Collins, 80526 Meeker, 81641 • What’s new in 2014 (970) 472-4300 (970) 878-6090 • Fees and surcharges a RDMInIsT aTIon • Hunter education requirements GlenwooD spRInGs MonTe vIsTa 0722 S. Road 1 E. 6060 Broadway 0088 Wildlife Way Denver, 80216 Identification, Mandatory Checks ................ 2 Glenwood Springs, 81601 Monte Vista, 81144 (719) 587-6900 (303) 297-1192 • Bighorn sheep and mountain goat identification tips (970) 947-2920 • Legal hunting hours, sunrise/sunset tables • Mandatory checks and reporting for sheep, goat I Hln T e fIe D? fInD THe sMaRTpHone eDITIon HeRe. • Hunter orientation www.bit.ly/coloradosheepandgoat In the field & special license Information ... 3 • Forest Service road closures, using pack goats Printed for free distribution by • Evidence of sex, attaching carcass tags (CPW) • Regulations for transporting and donating meat COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216 • Ranching for Wildlife & special management licenses (303) 297-1192 • TIPs program details cpw.state.co.us l icense & Hunting Requirements............. 4-5 Editor: Amy Bulger • License and residency requirements ......................4 Cover photo © CPW Hunter Testimonials • Auction and raffle licenses ........................................4 Printed Jan. 2014 by American Web, Denver. 80,000 copies. • Legal hunting methods .............................................5 Printing paid for with hunting and fishing license fees. • Hunting rules and illegal activities .........................5 Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director: Robert Broscheid a pplications ................................................... 6 • Using preference points The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission sets big-game regulations in January. Commission • How to apply as a group members are (as of Jan. 2014): Bill Kane, chairman • Mark Smith, vice chairman • Christopher • Where to submit your application Castilian, secretary • Robert Bray, member • Jeanne Horne, member • Gaspar Perricone, mem- • How to get refunds ber • James Pribyl, member • John Singletary, member • James Vigil, member • Dean Wingfield, member • Michelle Zimmerman, member • Mike King, ex officio member • John Salazar, ex b ighorn sheep ........................................... 7-9 officio member • Hunt code tables .....................................................7-9 CPW receives federal financial assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In accordance • MAP: Bighorn sheep units .......................................9 with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Title Mountain Goats ..................................... 10-11 IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior and its bureaus • Hunt code tables .......................................................10 prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex. • MAP: Mountain goat units....................................11 NOTE: Laws and regulations in this brochure are paraphrased for easier understanding and are intended only as a guide. Complete Colorado wildlife statutes and regulations are available at GMU Descriptions .................................. 12-13 CPW offices listed above and online atcpw.state.co.us/sh/regulations . Important Dates ............................ back cover 2014 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting lICense fees lICense TYpe ................................................................................fee » 2014 Habitat Stamp (required) ........................................................... $10 ResIDenTs » Rocky Mountain Bighorn ................................................................. $254 » Mountain Goat ..................................................................................... $254 2014WHAT’S NEW » Desert Bighorn ...................................................................................... $254 » applICaTIons wITH eRRoRs wIll be DIsqUalIfIeD — nonResIDenTs (must use paper applications to apply) Customers will no longer be contacted if there are errors on applications. Th is includes applications sent in without the correct amount of money, » Rocky Mountain Bighorn / fi shing combo ................................ $2,009 no hunter education box checked, incorrect hunt codes or those lacking » Mountain Goat / fi shing combo ...................................................... $2,009 a 2014 Habitat Stamp. Also, if you submit multiple applications for the » Desert Bighorn / fi shing combo .................................................... $1,339 same species — including an application for both Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep and desert bighorn sheep — all applications will be Nonresident annual fi shing licenses are good through March 31, 2015. disqualifi ed. See page 6. Fees listed include a $3 application fee, a 25-cent search-and-rescue fee » nonResIDenTs GeT bonUs annUal fIsHInG lICense — and 75-cent fee for Wildlife Management Public Education Fund. Nonresidents who purchase a big-game license in Colorado now get a combination big game/fi shing license. Bring your pole when you come ResIDenTs: bUY onlIne oR bY pHone to hunt big game, the annual fi shing license is good through March 2015. Go to cpw.state.co.us/sh/buyapply or call 1-800-244-5613. » new sHeep HUnTs — Th is year brings two new tags for Colorado residents. One bighorn ram license is available for residents in unit S36. Th ere is also a new nonresident license available for desert bighorn sheep wHaT YoU neeD To bUY a lICense anD HUnT in unit S62. See pages 8-9. 1. Current and valid photo ID (Colorado driver’s license must » UnIT s15 — Th ere is only one S15 ram sheep license available to be issued at least 6 months prior to applying as a resident) residents this year. Th ere are three additional licenses that will be given 2. Proof of hunter education (see requirements below at left) to hunters who missed their hunting opportunity in 2013 because of the 3. For residents, proof of residency (see page 4) closures due to wildfi res.See page 8. 4. A current Habitat Stamp (see requirements below) 5. Social Security Number is required for new customers 12 and older. » sHeep UnIT boUnDaRY CHanGes — Th ere are many changes to the unit boundaries — in particular note the boundaries for units HabITaT sTaMp S49 now extends west past Colo. 69 and into portions of what used to be unit S68. Th ere are also signifi cant changes to the boundary between • Anyone 18-64 MUsT buy a 2014 stamp prior to buying or applying S22 and S36. Check the unit descriptions to see if unit boundaries have for a preference point, or a hunting or fi shing license. changed before buying a license. See pages 12-13. • Stamps are $10 and are nonrefundable. Only one is required per person per year, valid April 1-March 31. A lifetime stamp is $300.25. » DRones Use IlleGal — Th e use of unmanned, remote-con- trolled fl ying drones to look for wildlife in a manner that aids hunting • Hunters ages 18-64 applying for a limited license must purchase a or harvesting animals is illegal. See page 5. stamp to apply in the drawing process. Applications submitted for hunters who do not have a Habitat Stamp will be disqualifi ed. • eXeMpTIons: Anyone with a free lifetime fi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003
    Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003 Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program Contract No. 68-D-02-0261 Work Order No. 1-06 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division Air Quality Trends Analysis Group Research Triangle Park, NC DISCLAIMER This report is a work prepared for the United States Government by Battelle. In no event shall either the United States Government or Battelle have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to acknowledge the assistance and input provided by the following advisors in the preparation of this guidance document: Rodger Ames, National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); Shao-Hang Chu, USEPA; Rich Damberg, USEPA; Tammy Eagan, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection; Neil Frank, USEPA; Eric Ginsburg, USEPA; Dennis Haddow, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ann Hess, Colorado State University; Hari Iyer, Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University; Mike Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium; Bill Leenhouts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Malm, National Park Service (CIRA); Debbie Miller, National Park Service; Tom Moore , Western Regional Air Partnership; Janice Peterson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Marc Pitchford, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; Rich Poirot, State of Vermont, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild
    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?)
    [Show full text]
  • A MODEL for BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr
    • A MODEL FOR BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Stephen J. Walsh Associate Professor Dr. George p. Malanson Assistant Professor Dr. John D. Vitek Associate Professor Dr. David R. Butler Assistant Professor Department of Geography Oklahoma State University & in conjunction with USDA/Agricultural Research Service SUBMITTED TO: Dr. Norman N. Durham, Director Water Research Center Oklahoma State University March 14, 1983 Introduction The surface of the earth is a complex system responding to the input of energy, natural and human. Human use of the surface for maximum agricultural efficiency requires knowledge of the interactions of all variables involved in the system. Broad categories of phenomena, including the atmosphere (weather and climate), biosphere (vegetation, fauna, and human activity), hydrosphere (precipitation, runoff, infiltration, fluvial erosion, and evapotranspiration), and the lithosphere (soil, topography, and parent material), can be identified as the major variables in any assessment. Assessment of interactions requires data from various sources. The emergence of remote sensing as a source of data for assessments in the last decade permits the development of more accurate predictive models. Refinements in data acquisition, such as improved resolution, the use of radar, and the correlation of detailed surface observations with satellite overpasses, provide researchers with the capability to assess inter­ relationships and create accurate models. A conceptual model, Figure 1, illustrates the interaction of the Department of Geography/CARS and the USDA/Agricultural Research Service with components of the natural system for the purpose of creating a predictive model for biomass assessment~~CARS, the remote sensing center at Oklahoma State University, plus ARS of the USDA bring different skills to this joint research effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Acecs---Royal
    Preliminary Evaluation of Potential ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Relevance and Importance Criteria Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office Cañon City, CO February 2017 This page intentionally left blank Preliminary Evaluation of Potential iii ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... xi _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _1.1. Eastern Colorado Resource Management Plan ............................................................... 1 _1.2. Authorities ....................................................................................................................... 1 _1.3. Area of Consideration ..................................................................................................... 1 _1.4. The ACEC Designation Process ..................................................................................... 1 _2. Requirements for ACEC Designation .................................................................................... 3 _2.1. Identifying ACECs .......................................................................................................... 5 _2.2. Special Management
    [Show full text]
  • Frozen Ground
    Frozen Ground Th e News Bulletin of the International Permafrost Association Number 32, December 2008 INTERNATIONAL PERMAFROST ASSOCIATION Th e International Permafrost Association, founded in 1983, has as its objectives to foster the dissemination of knowledge concerning permafrost and to promote cooperation among persons and national or international organisations engaged in scientifi c investigation and engineering work on permafrost. Membership is through national Adhering Bodies and Associate Members. Th e IPA is governed by its offi cers and a Council consisting of representatives from 26 Adhering Bodies having interests in some aspect of theoretical, basic and applied frozen ground research, including permafrost, seasonal frost, artifi cial freezing and periglacial phenomena. Committees, Working Groups, and Task Forces organise and coordinate research activities and special projects. Th e IPA became an Affi liated Organisation of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) in July 1989. Beginning in 1995 the IPA and the International Geographical Union (IGU) developed an Agreement of Cooperation, thus making IPA an affi liate of the IGU. Th e Association’s primary responsibilities are convening International Permafrost Conferences, undertaking special projects such as preparing databases, maps, bibliographies, and glossaries, and coordinating international fi eld programmes and networks. Conferences were held in West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A., 1963; in Yakutsk, Siberia, 1973; in Edmonton, Canada, 1978; in Fairbanks, Alaska, 1983; in Trondheim, Norway, 1988; in Beijing, China, 1993; in Yellowknife, Canada, 1998, in Zurich, Switzerland, 2003, and in Fairbanks, Alaska, in 2008. Th e Tenth conference will be in Tyumen, Russia, in 2012.Field excursions are an integral part of each Conference, and are organised by the host Executive Committee 2008-2012 Council Members Professor Hans-W.
    [Show full text]
  • July 15Th – Pikes Peak Group Program
    July 2014 | No. 203 July 15th – Pikes Peak Group Program Jes Meiris Presents: Big wall speed climbing on El Capitan Please join us in welcoming Jes Meiris to the monthly program Her passions include climbing big walls in alpine style, of the CMC’s Pikes Peak Group at 7:30 p.m. on July 15th in the mountain biking, hiking, playing piano, and snow sports. All Souls Unitarian Church, 730 N. Tejon St. Personal climbing adventures have yielded ascents in Squamish BC, Yosemite CA, Red Rocks NV, Smith Rocks OR, the Cascades, and Colorado's Rocky Mountains to name a few. With climbing partner Quinn Brett, she held the women's speed record on the Nose of El Capitan (10 hours, 19 minutes, on June 10, 2012), and just a couple of days ago reclaimed the record. Come hear about the history, the training for climbing almost four thousand vertical feet, the mental challenges, and bringing all the elements together for a successful climb. Jes is a Colorado native whose passion for the outdoors was kindled at a very young age. After living on both coasts and a few places in between, she made her home in Colorado Springs during the winter months. She coaches a competitive climbing team for Fountain Valley School, leads both indoor and outdoor technical skills clinics, and works as a At the monthly presentation Jes will discuss valuable lessons professional model. During the summer she travels regionally, she has learned through climbing and guiding, including her guiding rock climbing and mountain biking trips. In addition, speed ascent of the Nose on El Capitan.
    [Show full text]