DOCSLIB.ORG

Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe CONGRESS OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE REGIONALISATION TRENDS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 2007-2015 A study by members of the Group of Independent Experts of the European Charter of Local Self- Government Edited by Prof. Francesco Merloni Edition: June 2016 Layout: Congress of Local and Regional Authorities This study reflects the views of the contributing members of the Group of Independent Experts of the European Charter of Local Self-Government CONTENTS Introduction - Francesco Merloni et Carlos E. Pacheco Amaral ............................................................ 3 Albania - Edlir Vokopola ................................................................................................................... 22 Austria - Anna Gamper ..................................................................................................................... 31 Azerbaijan - Aydin Aslanov .............................................................................................................. 37 Belgium - Jean-Claude van Cauwenberghe ....................................................................................... 40 Bosnia and Herzegovina - Elena Simina Tănăsescu .......................................................................... 46 Croatia - Zvonimir Lauc ................................................................................................................... 50 Denmark - Vibeke Vinten ................................................................................................................. 56 Finland - Heikki Kulla ....................................................................................................................... 64 France - Michel Verpeaux .................................................................................................................. 71 Georgia - David Melua ...................................................................................................................... 77 Germany - Jens Woelk ..................................................................................................................... 94 Greece - Nikolaos Hlepas ................................................................................................................ 103 Hungary - Zoltán Szente ................................................................................................................. 110 Ireland - Mark Callanan .................................................................................................................. 116 Italy - Francesco Palermo, Sara Parolari, Alice Valdesalici ................................................................ 123 Netherlands - Michiel S. de Vries ..................................................................................................... 131 Norway - Harald Baldersheim, Lawrence E. Rose ............................................................................ 140 Portugal - Carlos E. Pacheco Amaral .............................................................................................. 146 Romania - Elena Simina Tănăsescu ................................................................................................ 149 Russian Federation - Yuri M. Pochta ...............................................................................................156 Serbia - Jelena Jerinić ..................................................................................................................... 168 Slovak Republic - Tomáš Černěnko, Veronika Ferčíková ................................................................... 175 Spain - Angel M. Moreno ................................................................................................................. 183 Sweden - Anders Lidström ............................................................................................................. 192 Switzerland - Reto Steiner, Claire Kaiser ......................................................................................... 197 Ukraine - Anatoliy Kruglashov ....................................................................................................... 203 United Kingdom - Jon Bloomfield .................................................................................................. 209 INTRODUCTION Trends in regionalisation in European countries (2007 – 2015) Pr. Francesco Merloni, professor of Public Law, University of Perugia, Italy and Carlos E. Pacheco Amaral, professor, Department of History, Philosophy and Social Sciences, University of the Azores, Portugal Purpose of the study The Congress entrusted the Group of Independent Experts on the European Charter of Local Self- Government with the task of producing a comparative academic study. This study is based on information from Council of Europe member States affected by the regionalisation process and on recent regionalisation developments in Europe. The main aim of this study is to evaluate regionalisation trends, towards both more and less regionalisation, in individual countries and consequently in Europe as a whole. At the same time it seeks to determine whether the various countries considered actually have regional institutions as defined by the 2009 Council of Europe Reference Framework for Regional Democracy. The intention is to review the situation regarding regionalisation since the 2007 report of the European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (CDLR)1. Following on from this, the idea is to achieve a broader understanding of the phenomenon from both the legal and institutional angles. The present study formed the basis of a report on the current state of regionalisation in Council of Europe member States (rapporteur: Ms Marie Madeleine Mialot-Muller)2. The study is based on a questionnaire, drawn up by a working group, covering six key points for evaluation of regionalisation processes and on the replies from experts in each of the countries concerned. I. General regionalisation trends II. Institutional and administrative organisation III. Powers IV. Financial autonomy V. Supervision VI. Relations with other tiers of government Definition of regionalisation The study takes the definitions of regions given in the Council of Europe Reference Framework for Regional Democracy, which considers regional authorities to be “territorial authorities between the central government and local authorities. This does not necessarily imply a hierarchical relationship between regional and local authorities.” It further states that “where regional authorities exist, the principle of regional self- government shall be recognised in domestic legislation and/or by the constitution, as appropriate”, defining regional self-government as “the legal competence and the ability of regional authorities, within the limits of the constitution and the law, to regulate and manage a share of public affairs under their own responsibility, in the interests of the regional population and in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity”. Again, according to the Reference Framework, “the right of regional self-government shall be exercised by assemblies elected through direct, free and secret suffrage. This provision shall in no way affect recourse to citizens’ assemblies, referendums or any other form of direct citizen participation, where it is permitted by law.’” 1 European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy: Report on European practice and recent developments in the field of regional self-government, 2007 - https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1240827&Site=COE 2 Trends in regionalisation in Council of Europe member States: Resolution 390 (2015) 2 of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities and Explanatory memorandum - https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CPR/2015(29)2FINAL&Language=lanEnglish 3 Countries covered The study has been limited to countries with institutions that can in principle be considered “regional” according to the Reference Framework definition. It covers 31 countries out of the 47 Council of Europe member States and has excluded the sixteen countries that definitely do not possess regional institutions, either because they are too small for regionalisation (seven member States: Andorra, Cyprus, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Principality of Monaco, San Marino) or because they have expressly ruled out any such process (nine member States: Armenia, Bulgaria, Estonia, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Slovenia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) and have only one (municipal) tier of territorial self-government. For these countries not included in the study there was no new drive towards regionalisation in the period under consideration (2007-2015). Given these exclusions, the study was confined to the following countries: Albania, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. The questionnaire was answered by 27 experts, who wrote the chapters on the individual countries, thus providing an excellent overview of regionalisation trends in Europe. New regionalisation initiatives The purpose of the study was to verify whether: a) there were countries where, as from 2007, the existing regional institutions had been further reinforced in institutional and constitutional terms;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APAIPA National Report France
    APAIPA ACTORS OF PROTECTION AND THE APPLICATION OF THE INTERNAL PROTECTION ALTERNATIVE NATIONAL REPORT FRANCE European Refugee Fund of the European Commission 2014 I. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. ............................................................................................................................ 2 II. GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS. ..................................................................................................................... 2 III. BACKGROUND: THE NATIONAL ASYLUM SYSTEM. .................................................................................. 2 A. APPLICABLE LAW. .......................................................................................................................................... 2 B. INSTITUTIONAL SETUP. .................................................................................................................................... 3 C. THE PROCEDURE. ........................................................................................................................................... 4 D. REPRESENTATION AND LEGAL AID. ..................................................................................................................... 5 IV. METHODOLOGY: SAMPLE AND INTERVIEWS. .......................................................................................... 6 A. METHODOLOGY USED. .................................................................................................................................... 6 B. DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE. .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Constitution of Malaysia
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION First introduced as the Constitution … 31 August 1957 of the Federation of Malaya on Merdeka Day Subsequently introduced as the … … 16 September 1963 Constitution of Malaysia on Malaysia Day PREVIOUS REPRINTS First Reprint … … … … … 1958 Second Reprint … … … … … 1962 Third Reprint … … … … … 1964 Fourth Reprint … … … … … 1968 Fifth Reprint … … … … … 1970 Sixth Reprint … … … … … 1977 Seventh Reprint … … … … … 1978 Eighth Reprint … … … … … 1982 Ninth Reprint … … … … … 1988 Tenth Reprint … … … … … 1992 Eleventh Reprint … … … … … 1994 Twelfth Reprint … … … … … 1997 Thirteenth Reprint … … … … … 2002 Fourteenth Reprint … … … … … 2003 Fifteenth Reprint … … … … … 2006 Federal Constitution CONTENTS PAGE ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES 3–15 CONSTITUTION 17–208 LIST OF AMENDMENTS 209–211 LIST OF ARTICLES AMENDED 212–229 4 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION NOTE: The Notes in small print on unnumbered pages are not part of the authoritative text. They are intended to assist the reader by setting out the chronology of the major amendments to the Federal Constitution and for editorial reasons, are set out in the present format. Federal Constitution 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES PART I THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION Article 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation 3. Religion of the Federation 4. Supreme Law of the Federation PART II FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES 5. Liberty of the person 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited 7.
    [Show full text]
  • JHH 6.3 Nov 09 Layout
    Volume 16 Issue 1 Spring 2019 JOURNALOF holistic healthcare Re-imagining healthcare •The nature–human connection •Gaian psychology •Reclaiming nature-based practice •Goethian science •Super-resilience •Ecotherapy for young people •Health and wellbeing through nature •Your world in words •The fractal effect •Nurturing wellbeing •Illuminations of nature •Poetry – Fiona Hamilton – Peter Owen-Jones – Larry Butler Nature connections Your Invitation Weleda Gardens Open Day Sunday 14 July 2019 11am - 4pm The Field, Hassock Lane, Heanor, Derbyshire, DE75 7JH A610 IKEA Langley Mill Station A608 Shipley A6096 A6007 Heanor R The Field oad Ilkeston Weleda Aldi We are Tesco here A6007 A rare opportunity to visit our private gardens and ZLOGĭRZHUPHDGRZWRJHWDQLQVLJKWLQWRWKHSODQWV WKDWDUHDWWKHKHDUWRIRXUSURGXFWV&RPHDORQJ 3URĬWVJRWRVXSSRUWWKHZRUN DQGOHDUQDOODERXW'HUE\VKLUH:LOGOLIH7UXVWWRR RI'HUE\VKLUH:LOGOLIH7UXVW DQGORFDOLQLWLDWLYHV Tickets - Single £5, Family £10 For tickets go to: Derbyshire www.weleda.co.uk/page/openday W i l d l i f e Tr u s t JOURNALOF holistic Contents healthcare ISSN 1743-9493 Editorial . 2 The nature–human connection and health . 3 Published by Alex Laird British Holistic Medical Association Gaian psychology in practice. 7 West Barn, Chewton Keynsham An outcome study of groupwork to address concerns about the world BRISTOL BS31 2SR Chris Johnstone [email protected] www.bhma.org Reclaiming nature-based practice for the modern world . 11 From green care to soulcentric rites of passage Reg. Charity No. 289459 Roger Duncan Managing mental health with nature . 15 Editor-in-chief Paul Brook David Peters The Earth Says (after Hokasai Says) . 18 [email protected] Larry Butler Editorial Board Learning super-resilience from nature .
    [Show full text]
  • Arrested Development: the Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank
    B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Tel. (972) 2-6735599 | Fax (972) 2-6749111 Barrier in the West Bank www.btselem.org | [email protected] October 2012 Arrested Development: The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank October 2012 Research and writing Eyal Hareuveni Editing Yael Stein Data coordination 'Abd al-Karim Sa'adi, Iyad Hadad, Atef Abu a-Rub, Salma a-Deb’i, ‘Amer ‘Aruri & Kareem Jubran Translation Deb Reich Processing geographical data Shai Efrati Cover Abandoned buildings near the barrier in the town of Bir Nabala, 24 September 2012. Photo Anne Paq, activestills.org B’Tselem would like to thank Jann Böddeling for his help in gathering material and analyzing the economic impact of the Separation Barrier; Nir Shalev and Alon Cohen- Lifshitz from Bimkom; Stefan Ziegler and Nicole Harari from UNRWA; and B’Tselem Reports Committee member Prof. Oren Yiftachel. ISBN 978-965-7613-00-9 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Part I The Barrier – A Temporary Security Measure? ................. 7 Part II Data ....................................................................... 13 Maps and Photographs ............................................................... 17 Part III The “Seam Zone” and the Permit Regime ..................... 25 Part IV Case Studies ............................................................ 43 Part V Violations of Palestinians’ Human Rights due to the Separation Barrier ..................................................... 63 Conclusions................................................................................ 69 Appendix A List of settlements, unauthorized outposts and industrial parks on the “Israeli” side of the Separation Barrier .................. 71 Appendix B Response from Israel's Ministry of Justice .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peace Volume 20 Number 4 July-August 2010 MOVING BEYOND A SETTLEMENT FREEZE — THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LOOKS FOR A NEW COURSE By Geoffrey Aronson the settlement of Amona, for example, The wave of building in Judea the state prosecutor’s office offered an In their meeting on July 6, President and Samaria has never been explanation for its inaction that was Barack Obama and Israeli prime minis- higher. Thousands of units are described by Ha’aretz correspondent ter Benjamin Netanyahu presented a being built in every location. I Akiva Eldar as “the line that will go well-choreographed bit of political the- was never a fan of the freeze. No down in the ‘chutzpah’ record books: atre aimed at highlighting the “excel- one in the cabinet was. [The The prosecution asks to reject the lent” personal and political relations be- freeze] was a mistake. It is impos- demand to evacuate the illegal settle- tween the two leaders and the countries sible to take people and freeze ment since diverting the limited means they represent. Obama explained after them. This is not a solution. The of enforcement to old illegal construc- their meeting that, “As Prime Minister government remains committed tion ‘is not high on the respondents’ Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the to renew a wave of construction agenda.’ And why not? ‘Means of bond between the United States and this coming September. In any enforcement’ are needed to implement Israel is unbreakable.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes
    Med Humanities: first published as 10.1136/mh.26.1.63 on 1 June 2000. Downloaded from J Med Ethics: Medical Humanities 2000;26:63–64 News and Notes In this regular column we will be and members of the public are explor- UK Universities; Sir William Reid, including brief reports, announce- ing collaborative ways forward to former Health Service Commissioner ments and items of news on develop- ensure sustainable educational devel- for England; Baroness Hayman and ments or events of significance to the opment, appropriate standard setting Baroness Jay, former Under- field of medical humanities. In this for group work and for courses and Secretaries of State for Health; the first issue British items feature promi- research, criteria for good professional Right Honourable Chris Smith MP, nently, but the editors welcome mate- practice, improved ways of disseminat- Secretary of State for Culture, Media rial from around the world. Contribu- ing information and better empower- and Sport, and the Right Honourable tors are invited to send material ing of public action. Mr Alan Howarth, MP, Government directly to the editors, David Greaves “Against this background, Sir Ken- Minister for the Arts. and Martyn Evans, Centre for Philos- neth Calman, formerly the UK Chief “In Autumn 1999 the NuYeld ophy and Health Care, School of Medical OYcer and now Vice Chan- Trust helped to establish a Centre for Health Science, University of Wales cellor, Durham University, convened a the Arts and Humanities in Health Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea meeting in December 1996 to explore and Medicine (CAHHM) at Durham SA2 8PP.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Policy Priorities for Greater Manchester January 2017
    Three policy priorities for Greater Manchester January 2017 Introduction The first metro mayor of Greater Manchester will be elected with a vision for the city and clear strategic, deliverable policies to meet it. The challenge and workload will be considerable, with powers and expectations ranging from delivering policy, to establishing the institutions and capacity for effective city-region governance. This briefing offers three priorities that address the biggest issues facing Greater Manchester. A ‘quick win’ will help the mayor to set the tone for delivery right from the start. Delivering results quickly will build trust, and show what the metro mayor is able to do for the city-region. The best ‘quick wins’ in these circumstances are high profile and of value to citizens. Strategic decisions form the framework for delivering the metro mayor’s vision. As such, the mayor will have the power to take the decisions that will make the most of the new geography of governance. While the mayor will be keen to show progress towards their vision, strategic decisions will often take longer to show outcomes, therefore careful evaluation is needed to allow for flexibility and to demonstrate the effects. A long term vision for the city will be the key election platform – it is what the mayor is working towards while in office. This should be ambitious, but reflect the real needs and potential of the city. Some aspects of the vision will be achievable within the mayor’s term in office, while others will build momentum or signal a change in direction. It is important to be clear and strike the balance of where each policy lies on this spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 09/23/2021 12:29:26PM Via Free Access Austria Belgium
    Section 5 Data relating to political systems THE COUNTRIES OF WESTERN EUROPE referendum. The constitutional court (Verfassungsgerichtshof ) determines the constitutionality of legislation and Austria executive acts. Population 8.1 million (2000) Current government The 1999 Capital Vienna election brought to an end the Territory 83,857 sq. km 13-year government coalition GDP per capita US$25,788 (2000) between the Social Democratic Party Unemployment 3.7 per cent of of Austria (SPÖ) and Austrian workforce (2000) People’s Party (ÖVP), which had State form Republic. The Austrian been under considerable strain. When constitution of 1920, as amended in the two parties failed to reach a 1929, was restored on 1 May 1945. On coalition agreement, Austria found 15 May 1955, the four Allied Powers itself short of viable alternatives. The signed the State Treaty with Austria, record gains of the radical right ending the occupation and Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) had recognising Austrian independence. changed the balance of power within Current head of state President the party system. The other two Thomas Klestil (took office 8 July numerically viable coalitions – 1992, re-elected 1998). SPÖ/FPÖ or ÖVP/FPÖ – had been State structure A federation with nine ruled out in advance by the two provinces (Länder), each with its own mainstream parties. An attempt by the constitution, legislature and SPÖ to form a minority government government. failed. Finally, a coalition was formed Government The president appoints the between the ÖVP and FPÖ under prime minister (chancellor), and, on Wolfgang Schüssel (ÖVP) and the chancellor’s recommendation, a reluctantly sworn in by President cabinet (Council of Ministers) of Klestil on 5 February 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations' Political Aversion to the European Microstates
    UN-WELCOME: The United Nations’ Political Aversion to the European Microstates -- A Thesis -- Submitted to the University of Michigan, in partial fulfillment for the degree of HONORS BACHELOR OF ARTS Department Of Political Science Stephen R. Snyder MARCH 2010 “Elephants… hate the mouse worst of living creatures, and if they see one merely touch the fodder placed in their stall they refuse it with disgust.” -Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, 77 AD Acknowledgments Though only one name can appear on the author’s line, there are many people whose support and help made this thesis possible and without whom, I would be nowhere. First, I must thank my family. As a child, my mother and father would try to stump me with a difficult math and geography question before tucking me into bed each night (and a few times they succeeded!). Thank you for giving birth to my fascination in all things international. Without you, none of this would have been possible. Second, I must thank a set of distinguished professors. Professor Mika LaVaque-Manty, thank you for giving me a chance to prove myself, even though I was a sophomore and studying abroad did not fit with the traditional path of thesis writers; thank you again for encouraging us all to think outside the box. My adviser, Professor Jenna Bednar, thank you for your enthusiastic interest in my thesis and having the vision to see what needed to be accentuated to pull a strong thesis out from the weeds. Professor Andrei Markovits, thank you for your commitment to your students’ work; I still believe in those words of the Moroccan scholar and will always appreciate your frank advice.
    [Show full text]
  • 1/98 Germany (Country Code +49) Communication of 5.V.2020: The
    Germany (country code +49) Communication of 5.V.2020: The Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA), the Federal Network Agency for Electricity, Gas, Telecommunications, Post and Railway, Mainz, announces the National Numbering Plan for Germany: Presentation of E.164 National Numbering Plan for country code +49 (Germany): a) General Survey: Minimum number length (excluding country code): 3 digits Maximum number length (excluding country code): 13 digits (Exceptions: IVPN (NDC 181): 14 digits Paging Services (NDC 168, 169): 14 digits) b) Detailed National Numbering Plan: (1) (2) (3) (4) NDC – National N(S)N Number Length Destination Code or leading digits of Maximum Minimum Usage of E.164 number Additional Information N(S)N – National Length Length Significant Number 115 3 3 Public Service Number for German administration 1160 6 6 Harmonised European Services of Social Value 1161 6 6 Harmonised European Services of Social Value 137 10 10 Mass-traffic services 15020 11 11 Mobile services (M2M only) Interactive digital media GmbH 15050 11 11 Mobile services NAKA AG 15080 11 11 Mobile services Easy World Call GmbH 1511 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1512 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1514 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1515 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1516 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1517 11 11 Mobile services Telekom Deutschland GmbH 1520 11 11 Mobile services Vodafone GmbH 1521 11 11 Mobile services Vodafone GmbH / MVNO Lycamobile Germany 1522 11 11 Mobile services Vodafone
    [Show full text]
  • Framing “The Gypsy Problem”: Populist Electoral Use of Romaphobia in Italy (2014–2019)
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Framing “The Gypsy Problem”: Populist Electoral Use of Romaphobia in Italy (2014–2019) Laura Cervi * and Santiago Tejedor Department of Journalism and Communication Sciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Campus de la UAB, Plaça Cívica, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 May 2020; Accepted: 12 June 2020; Published: 17 June 2020 Abstract: Xenophobic arguments have long been at the center of the political discourse of the Lega party in Italy, nonetheless Matteo Salvini, the new leader, capitalizing on diffused Romaphobia, placed Roma people at the center of his political discourse, institutionalizing the “Camp visit” as an electoral event. Through the analysis of eight consecutive electoral campaigns, in a six year period, mixing computer-based quantitative and qualitative content analysis and framing analysis, this study aims to display how Roma communities are portrayed in Matteo Salvini’s discourse. The study describes how “Gypsies” are framed as a threat to society and how the proposed solution—a bulldozer to raze all of the camps to the ground—is presented as the only option. The paper concludes that representing Roma as an “enemy” that “lives among us”, proves to be the ideal tool to strengthen the “us versus them” tension, characteristic of populist discourse. Keywords: populism; Romaphobia; far right parties; political discourse 1. Introduction Defining Roma is challenging. A variety of understandings and definitions, and multiple societal and political representations, exist about “who the Roma are” (Magazzini and Piemontese 2019). The Council of Europe, in an effort to harmonize the terminology used in its political documents, apply “Roma”—first chosen at the inaugural World Romani Congress held in London in 1971—as an umbrella term that includes “Roma, Sinti, Travellers, Ashkali, Manush, Jenische, Kaldaresh and Kalé” and covers the wide diversity of the groups concerned, “including persons who identify themselves as Gypsies” (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]