ISRAEL.Qxp Mise En Page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page1 Middle East & West Asia ISRAEL UNITARY COUNTRY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISRAEL.Qxp Mise En Page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page1 Middle East & West Asia ISRAEL UNITARY COUNTRY Fiche ISRAEL.qxp_Mise en page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page1 Middle East & West Asia ISRAEL UNITARY COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: HIGH INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: NEW ISRAELI SHEKEL (ILS) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 21 643 km 2 GDP: 333.4 billion (current PPP international dollars), i.e. 38 276 dollars per inhabitant Population: 8.709 million inhabitants (2017), an increase of 1.7% (2017) per year (2010-2015) Real GDP growth: 3.3% (2017 vs 2016) Density: 402 inhabitants / km 2 Unemployment rate: 4.2% (2017) Urban population: 92.3% of national population Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 18 169 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population growth: 2.0% (2017) Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF): 20.3% of GDP (2016) Capital city: Jerusalem (10.4% of national population) HDI: 0.903 (very high), rank 22 (2017) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Israel is a unitary parliamentary democracy established in 1948 by the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. Israel has no formal written constitution but thirteen “Basic Laws” (and a temporary one) that were passed in 1957 to set up a legal framework. The first basic law established the parliament in 1958. It is a unicameral parliament ( Knesset ) composed of 120 members elected every four years by direct universal suffrage. The Knesset elects the President of the State in a secret vote for a single, seven-year term. The country’s prime minister is the head of government and chief executive, entrusted with the task of forming the cabinet, which is the government’s main policy-making and executive body. Following the Knesset elections, the prime minister is nominated by the President from among the Knesset members after asking party leaders whom they support for the position. Israel has a rather centralised system of governance that is influenced by three factors: 1) British colonial Municipal Ordinances of 1934 and 1941 that are still in place, 2) socialist traditions of Israel’s early governments (1948-1977), and 3) its economic model called the “developmental state”. No major decentralisation reform or devolution of powers has officially taken place and the central government retains most of the powers and strict oversight of local government activities and finances. Bylaws and ordinances adopted by councils, as well as their budgets, are subject to approval by the Ministry of the Interior. However, some de-facto decentralisation of political power has taken place since the 1970s, starting with the direct election of mayors and chairpersons by universal suffrage since the 1975 Law on Local Authorities, which went into effect in 1978 (“the Law on the Direct Election of Local Authorities”). Previously, they were elected by local councils from among their members. Councils members are elected on the basis of proportional representation for a five-year term. Since then, the country has aimed to improve public administration and enhance accountability, transparency and financial responsibility of local governments. In fact, the central government has gradually withdrawn from delivering and overseeing local services. Some additional responsibilities have been transferred to local governments. TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION 2018 Municipal level Intermediate level regional or State level Total number of SNGs 257 local authorities Average municipal size: 33 253 inhabitants 257 257 OVERALL DESCRIPTION. The 257 local governments are divided into three categories: 77 municipalities, 124 local councils, and 54 regional councils. There are also two local industrial councils, which only manage industrial zones and do not have residents. MUNICIPAL LEVEL. The status of municipalities is granted to cities with at least 20 000 inhabitants while that of local councils is reserved for towns between 2 000 and 20 000 inhabitants. Regional councils operate at the local level, bringing together settlements spread across rural areas (mainly kibbutzim , moshavim and bedouin villages) to unite local communities and provide local services. In regional councils, each village or community elects one candidate by a simple majority, who becomes a member of the council. In 2016, around 75% of population lived in municipalities, 15% lived in local councils and 10% in regional councils. SNGs are large by international comparison. Their average demographic size is 33 500 inhabitants vs 9700 inhabitants in the OECD. Around 30% of municipalities have fewer than 5 000 inhabitants (vs 44% in the OECD) and 3% fewer than 2 000 inhabitants (vs 28% in the OECD). Israel has 15 cities with populations over 100 000, including Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, Rishon LeZion, Ashdod, and Petah Tikva. Four metropolitan regions have been identified (Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem, and Beersheba). To provide a more comprehensive assessment of both the resources and the economic and social needs of each local government, the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) defined 10 socio-economic clusters which are used by the government in the implementation of a number of policies related to local governments. MUNICIPAL MERGERS AND INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION. Several attempts have been made to reduce the number of local councils through mergers. In 2003, 23 local councils were consolidated into 11. However, in subsequent years some of these mergers were later reversed. Inter-municipal cooperation is increasingly popular. It started as a voluntary bottom-up process with the creation of the Western Galilee Cluster in 2009, under the form of “Regional cluster”. A pilot programme to establish Voluntary Regional Clusters was created in 2012 under the initiative of the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Finance and several civil society organisations. Subsequent legislation passed by the Knesset formalised the legal status of clusters on December 2016. In 2018, their number increased from 5 to 10, the number of associated local authorities increased from 59 to 109, and the scope of budgetary activity Fiche ISRAEL.qxp_Mise en page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page2 increased from about USD 4.16 million to about USD 61 million. Clusters deal with responsibilities such as environmental protection, waste, veterinary services, transportation, specialised education, economic development, etc. STATE TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION. Israel has six statutory administrative districts – North, South, Centre, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Haifa – subdivided into 15 sub-districts. Headed by an officer of the Ministry of the Interior, districts are in charge of overseeing SNGs. Other ministries also have administrative districts, but they are not statutory. Districts act solely as administrative zones delimiting national policy plans. SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES The 1934 and 1941 Municipal Ordinances provided the legal framework for the local government system including a detailed breakdown of municipalities' responsibilities. This framework is, by and large, still in place today. Other regulations have been adopted since to delimit more precisely between central and local functions and provide a more robust legal framework for local government responsibilities. However, Israel does not have a comprehensive modern law on SNG functions, despite past attempts to adopt a new Municipalities Bill, especially in 2007. Local councils’ responsibilities are divided between compulsory responsibilities, devolved competences, and voluntary services. Services under the statutory responsibility of councils as specified by law concern supervision of public works within boundaries, sewerage services, sanitary services, veterinary services and more. Most responsibilities in education and social welfare are national services delegated and operated through SNGs, and their delineation is often unclear. Moreover, local councils sometimes provide additional services according to their preference and depending on their available resources, in particular in the fields of culture, recreation and environmental protection. Over the last few years, decentralisation has occurred. For example, Amendment 101 to the Planning and Building Law (2014) contributed to giving more responsibility and discretion to SNGs in this area. Land-use planning authority was shifted to local level in 2014 to make it more efficient. By contrast, municipal water and sanitation services have been gradually transformed into corporatised utilities that are owned by local municipalities and regulated under licenses by the Israeli Water Authority (IWA). There are now 56 regional water and sanitation utilities serving 187 municipalities and local councils. 27 municipalities serving approximately 4.5% of the population remain without a corporatised water utility. Main responsibility sectors and sub-sectors municipal level 1. General public services Internal administration (including tax and fees collection) 2. Public order and safety Municipal supervision 3. Economic affairs/ transports Physical infrastructure; Roads; Development of a long-term employment strategy (since 2006); Local tourism; Municipal transport infrastructure 4. Environmental protection Parks and public gardens 5. Housing and community amenities Water supply and sanitation (see above); Refuse collection and disposal system; Town and land-use planning; Housing; Street cleaning and sanitation; Veterinary services 6. Health 7. Recreation, culture & religion Sports activities; Cultural activities (libraries, museums, arts, crafts, orchestras, choirs, theatres and similar enterprises); Youth
Recommended publications
  • Arrested Development: the Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank
    B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Tel. (972) 2-6735599 | Fax (972) 2-6749111 Barrier in the West Bank www.btselem.org | [email protected] October 2012 Arrested Development: The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank October 2012 Research and writing Eyal Hareuveni Editing Yael Stein Data coordination 'Abd al-Karim Sa'adi, Iyad Hadad, Atef Abu a-Rub, Salma a-Deb’i, ‘Amer ‘Aruri & Kareem Jubran Translation Deb Reich Processing geographical data Shai Efrati Cover Abandoned buildings near the barrier in the town of Bir Nabala, 24 September 2012. Photo Anne Paq, activestills.org B’Tselem would like to thank Jann Böddeling for his help in gathering material and analyzing the economic impact of the Separation Barrier; Nir Shalev and Alon Cohen- Lifshitz from Bimkom; Stefan Ziegler and Nicole Harari from UNRWA; and B’Tselem Reports Committee member Prof. Oren Yiftachel. ISBN 978-965-7613-00-9 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Part I The Barrier – A Temporary Security Measure? ................. 7 Part II Data ....................................................................... 13 Maps and Photographs ............................................................... 17 Part III The “Seam Zone” and the Permit Regime ..................... 25 Part IV Case Studies ............................................................ 43 Part V Violations of Palestinians’ Human Rights due to the Separation Barrier ..................................................... 63 Conclusions................................................................................ 69 Appendix A List of settlements, unauthorized outposts and industrial parks on the “Israeli” side of the Separation Barrier .................. 71 Appendix B Response from Israel's Ministry of Justice .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peace Volume 20 Number 4 July-August 2010 MOVING BEYOND A SETTLEMENT FREEZE — THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LOOKS FOR A NEW COURSE By Geoffrey Aronson the settlement of Amona, for example, The wave of building in Judea the state prosecutor’s office offered an In their meeting on July 6, President and Samaria has never been explanation for its inaction that was Barack Obama and Israeli prime minis- higher. Thousands of units are described by Ha’aretz correspondent ter Benjamin Netanyahu presented a being built in every location. I Akiva Eldar as “the line that will go well-choreographed bit of political the- was never a fan of the freeze. No down in the ‘chutzpah’ record books: atre aimed at highlighting the “excel- one in the cabinet was. [The The prosecution asks to reject the lent” personal and political relations be- freeze] was a mistake. It is impos- demand to evacuate the illegal settle- tween the two leaders and the countries sible to take people and freeze ment since diverting the limited means they represent. Obama explained after them. This is not a solution. The of enforcement to old illegal construc- their meeting that, “As Prime Minister government remains committed tion ‘is not high on the respondents’ Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the to renew a wave of construction agenda.’ And why not? ‘Means of bond between the United States and this coming September. In any enforcement’ are needed to implement Israel is unbreakable.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 March 2004 ICG Asia Report N°77 Islamabad/Brussels
    DEVOLUTION IN PAKISTAN: REFORM OR REGRESSION? 22 March 2004 ICG Asia Report N°77 Islamabad/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 3 A. GENERAL AYUB KHAN'S BASIC DEMOCRACY.......................................................................3 B. GENERAL ZIA-UL-HAQ'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM ......................................................4 III. THE MUSHARRAF DEVOLUTION........................................................................... 5 A. DOMESTIC AND EXTERNAL IMPERATIVES .............................................................................5 B. THE BLUEPRINT ....................................................................................................................7 1. Administrative Decentralisation ................................................................................7 2. Fiscal Decentralisation...............................................................................................8 3. Law Enforcement.......................................................................................................8 C. MILITARY EXCEPTIONS.........................................................................................................8 D. DOMESTIC REACTION ...........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 4Th Uclg World Congress
    RABAT 2013 1-4 OCTOBER 2ND WORLD SUMMIT OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEADERS Report OF THE 4thUCLG WORLD CONGRESS 1 SUMMARY 04 09 10 14 FOREWORD AT THE HEART OPENING CEREMONY THEMATIC ROUND OF THE WORLD AND INTRODUCTORY TABLES AND SUMMIT PLENARY PARALLEL SESSIONS rabat 2013 - the world summit in numbers | www.uclg.org 48 53 54 62 STRATEGIC CLOSING PLENARY SIDE EVENTS FINAL PLENARIES DECLARATION Foreword UCLG offered attendees a unique opportunity to debate and exchange their views on the most vital issues for the agenda of sub-national authorities and their partners for the 21st century. 4 rabat 2013 - the world summit in numbers | www.uclg.org REPORT OF THE 4TH UCLG WORLD CONGRESS , the centenary year of the international municipal movement, 2013 saw the celebration of 2nd World Summit of UCLG from 1-4 October 2013 in Rabat, Morocco. The Moroccan capital “supports all initiatives that aim to promote the principles of decentralization and local democratic development” (extract from the The Moroccan capital speech by the King of Morocco, read at the Summit “supports all opening by Mr Fathallah Oualalou, Mayor of Rabat). initiatives that Over 3,000 participants from 125 countries from all aim to promote regions of the world took part in the four day event. the principles Representatives of local and regional authorities, national governments, multi-lateral agencies, the of decentra- private sector, development partners and civil society lization and came together to connect, debate and exchange local democratic experiences. The four days offered a unique opportunity development.” for them to debate and exchange their views on the most vital issues for the agenda of sub-national authorities Mr Fathallah Oualalou, and their partners for the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • PUNONG BARANGAY TASKS and RESPONSIBILITIES Checklist
    PUNONG BARANGAY TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Checklist NOT FOR SALE a PUNONG BARANGAY TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Checklist NOT FOR SALE Punong Barangay Tasks and Responsibilities Checklist Copyright@2018 Local Government Academy (LGA) Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) All rights reserved. All rights reserved. No portions of this book may be copied or reproduced in books, pamphlets, typewritten, xeroxed, or in any other form for distribution or sale, without permission from the Academy. ISBN: 978-971-0576-81-4 Printed and bounded in Manila, Philippines. Published by: Local Government Academy Department of the Interior and Local Government 8/F Agustin I Bldg., F. Ortigas, Jr. Road, (formerly Emerald Ave.) Ortigas Center, Pasig City 1605 Philippines Tel Nos. (632) 634-8430 / 634-8436 www.lga.gov.ph Technical Working Group: Alfonso A. Maralli, Jr. Sally S. Jumalon Maria Louisa B. Bite Cover and Layout: Iris A. Igrobay PUNONG BARANGAY TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Checklist TABLE OF CONTENTS I Messages iii - vi II List of Acronyms vii III Tasks and Responsibilities as Mandated by the Local Government Code 1 IV Tasks and Responsibilities Pursuant to Presidential Directives 5 V List of Presidential Directives and DILG Memorandum Circulars 31 i PUNONG BARANGAY TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Checklist MESSAGE The public offices are public trusts. They are a manifestation of the will of the people. This is at the very core of democracy that we enjoy today. Both local and national officials are in the same situation, they are accountable to the people, the constituents that voted for them. The funds that are utilized are from the people and the natural resources that belong to the nation and its future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • B'tselem Report: Dispossession & Exploitation: Israel's Policy in the Jordan Valley & Northern Dead Sea, May
    Dispossession & Exploitation Israel's policy in the Jordan Valley & northern Dead Sea May 2011 Researched and written by Eyal Hareuveni Edited by Yael Stein Data coordination by Atef Abu a-Rub, Wassim Ghantous, Tamar Gonen, Iyad Hadad, Kareem Jubran, Noam Raz Geographic data processing by Shai Efrati B'Tselem thanks Salwa Alinat, Kav LaOved’s former coordinator of Palestinian fieldworkers in the settlements, Daphna Banai, of Machsom Watch, Hagit Ofran, Peace Now’s Settlements Watch coordinator, Dror Etkes, and Alon Cohen-Lifshitz and Nir Shalev, of Bimkom. 2 Table of contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter One: Statistics........................................................................................................ 8 Land area and borders of the Jordan Valley and northern Dead Sea area....................... 8 Palestinian population in the Jordan Valley .................................................................... 9 Settlements and the settler population........................................................................... 10 Land area of the settlements .......................................................................................... 13 Chapter Two: Taking control of land................................................................................ 15 Theft of private Palestinian land and transfer to settlements......................................... 15 Seizure of land for “military needs”.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    BROADENING THE SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN ISRAEL: BElWEEN ACTIVISM AND RESTRAINT Daphne Barak-Erez* I. Introduction: Judicial Review in Israel: a Case-Study The debate around the scope and function of judicial review is a classical one. The present article will address it by focusing on the case study ofjudiCial review in the Israeli Supreme Court. The focus on this example is of speCial interest because the Israeli approach has transformed Significantly since the 1980s and currently presents an espeCially broad version of robust judiCial review. Additionally, taking into consideration the intensity of public life in Israel and the challenges that the country faces (including security threats), the case law of the Israeli Supreme Court touches on diverse and controversial public matters. In order to fully assess these developments, it is worthwhile to review the doctrinal changes, which have enabled the broadening of the scope of judiCial review. Against this background, the article will assess the defacto impact of these developments and will depart from the more traditional debates around the jurisprudence of the court, which focused on the normative deSirability of the doctrinal changes. 1 ll. Doctrinal Changes and the Growing Scope of Judicial Review in Israel The developments in the law of judiCial review since the 1980s have been dramatic, and include the follOwing: Stewart and Judy Colton Professor of Law, Chair of Law and Security, Faculty of Law, Tel-Aviv University. An earlier version of this article was presented at a joint conference of the Israeli Supreme Court and the Indian Supreme Court, December 200B. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel, Thus the Action Is Not a Discriminatory Act, but Is a Distinction That the State Is Permitted to Make
    In the Supreme Court sitting as the High Court of Justice HCJ 548/04 HCJ 670/04 HCJ 898/04 Before: The Honorable Justice D. Dorner The Honorable Justice A. Procaccia The Honorable Justice E. E. Levy The Petitioners in HCJ 548/04: 1. Amana – The Gush Emunim Settlement Movement 2. Binyamin Regional Council 1. Shomron Regional Council 2. Gush Etzion Regional Council 3. Har Hevron Regional Council The Petitioners in HCJ 670/04: 1. Yaakov Ichstein 2. Kiryat Arba Local Council The Petitioner in HCJ 898/04: Ofra Cooperative Village for Settlement Ltd. v e r s u s The Respondent in HCJ 548/04: Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria The Respondents in HCJ 670/04: 1. The Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon 2. The Defense Minister, Shaul Mofaz 3. The Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria, Maj. Gen. Moshe Kaplinsky The Respondent in HCJ 898/04: The Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria, Maj. Gen. Moshe Kaplinsky Petition for Order Nisi and Interlocutory Order Date of the session: 13 Shvat 5764 (5 February 2004) On behalf of Petitioners in HCJ 548/04: Attorney Yehuda Rasler On behalf of the Petitioners in HCJ 670/04: Attorney Nadav Haetzni; Attorney Orit Haim On behalf of the Petitioner in HCJ 898/04: Attorney David Rotem On behalf of the Respondents in HCJ 548/04, HCJ 670/04, and HCJ 898/04: Attorney Osnat Mandell J U D G M E N T Justice D. Dorner: In the three petitions before us, the petitioners challenge the validity of two orders issued by the commander of IDF forces in Judea and Samaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections in Iran
    AN INTRODUCTORY PRIMER ON Local Elections in Iran Structure of Local Government Local institutions resemble national ones in their dual nature. At almost every level of government, there are appointed, administrative councils headed by representatives of the central government. These institutions represent the top down hierarchy on the provincial, county, district, city and village level. There is also a parallel bottom up hierarchy of elected officials and councils, with local and village councils at its base. Village and city councils are the only local institutions whose members are directly elected. Once village councils are elected, councilors nominate members from their ranks to represent their village at district, or bakhsh, councils. Once bakhsh councils are formed, they nominate members to represent their bakhsh at county councils, and so on until the Supreme Council of the Provinces. The bottom-up, elected councils tend to play supervisory and consultative roles rather than legislative ones. City councils elect mayors, approve municipal budgets and supervise their implementation. They approve all city planning and development decisions. Conversely to elected bodies, central government and executive functions are largely managed through a top-down process of appointed heads of councils with the bulk of authority, although mayors are chosen by councils themselves. Mayors are in charge of implementing directives from city councils. They are nominated by the councils and approved by the Ministry of Interior, and serve as heads of the municipal administrations for four-year terms. The Ministry of the Interior also appoints the ostandars, who appoint the farmandars in their province with the Ministry’s approval and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Programme on Child Protection, 2006-2010 Building a Protective and Caring Environment for Filipino Children
    PROTECTING FILIPINO CHILDREN FROM ABUSE, EXPLOITATION AND VIOLENCE A Comprehensive Programme on Child Protection, 2006-2010 Building a Protective and Caring Environment for Filipino Children SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN c/o Department of Justice, Padre Faura, Manila December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 6 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION . 7 ¡Background/Rationale . 7 ¡Legal and Policy Framework 8 ¡Conceptual Framework . 10 CHAPTER 2 - PRIORITY CHILD PROTECTION ISSUES 13 ¡Child Labour . 13 ¡Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children . 14 ¡Physical and Sexual Abuse . 16 ¡Children in Conflict with the Law . 16 ¡Street Children . 17 ¡Children Affected by Armed Conflict & Displacement . 18 ¡Children and Drugs . 18 ¡Children with Disabilities . 19 ¡Children of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples . 19 ¡Other Children in Need of Special Protection . 20 ¡Priority Child Protection Issues by Islands . 20 ¡Summary of Major Issues and Problems to be Addressed . 21 CHAPTER 3 - CHILD PROTECTION GOALS, TARGETS AND INDICATORS 23 ¡Goals and Targets . 23 ¡Key Results Expected for 2006-2010 . 24 ¡Key Protection Indicators . 25 ¡Developing a Child Protection Index . 27 CHAPTER 4 - MAJOR STRATEGIES AND CORE INTERVENTIONS 28 ¡Cross-Cutting Strategies and Interventions . 28 ¡Preventive Actions and Early Interventions . 28 ¡Rescue, Recovery, Healing and Reintegration . 33 ¡Legal and Judicial Protection Measures . 38 CHAPTER 5 - CHILD PARTICIPATION IN CHILD PROTECTION 43 ¡Defining Children's Participation . 43 ¡Significance of Children's Participation . 44 ¡Building Resiliency and Self-Esteem . 44 ¡Organizing Children for Participation and Protection . 45 ¡Children and the BCPC . 47 CHAPTER 6 - MECHANISMS FOR ACTION, COORDINATION AND NETWORKING 49 ¡Role of the Family . 49 ¡Role of the School System .
    [Show full text]
  • Fragmented Jerusalem
    Fragmented Jerusalem Municipal Borders, Demographic Politics and Daily Realities in East Jerusalem www.paxforpeace.nl The views presented in the publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the other contributing authors and NGOs, or of PAX. Colofon ISBN/EAN: 978-94-92487-28-5 NUR 689 PAX Serial number: PAX/2018/04 April 2018 Cover photo: Palestinian boy in East Jerusalem. Copyright: Thierry Ozil / Alamy Stock Photo. About PAX PAX works with committed citizens and partners to protect civilians against acts of war, to end armed violence and to build just peace. PAX operates independently of political interest. www.paxforpeace.nl / P.O. Box 19318 / 3501 DH Utrecht, The Netherlands / [email protected] Fragmented Jerusalem Municipal Borders, Demographic Politics and Daily Realities in East Jerusalem PAX ! Fragmented Jerusalem 3 Table of Contents Preface 7 Executive Summary 10 Introduction 14 1. East Jerusalem: A Primer 17 PART I. ON THE BORDERS: A POLICY ANALYSIS 24 2. The Politics of Negligence: Municipal Policies on East Jerusalem 26 3. Redrawing the Jerusalem Borders: Unilateral Plans and Their Ramifications 32 4. Local Councils: Beyond the Barrier: Lessons Learnt from the Establishment of a Regional Council in Israel’s Negev 40 PART II: EAST JERUSALEM IN FRAGMENTS 48 5. Fragmenting Space, Society and Solidarity 50 6. Living in Fragments: The Palestinian Urban Landscape of Jerusalem 55 7. Jerusalem’s Post-Oslo Generation: Neglect and Determination 59 8. Problem or potential? Main Issues of Young Palestinians in East Jerusalem and Opportunities to Empower Them 64 PART III: ACTION PERSPECTIVES 68 9.
    [Show full text]