DOCSLIB.ORG

One Hundred] and Fourth Infantry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
One Hundred] and Fourth Infantry ONE HUNDRED] AND FOURTH INFANTRY. ABBEY, HENRY.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. C, December 26, 1861; killed in action, July 1, 3863, at Gettysburg, Pa. ABRIL, JOSEPH.—Age, 35 years. Enlisted, March 15, 1865, at New York city, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co. K, April 15, 1865; mustered out with company, July 17, 1865, near Washington, D. C. ADAMS, EDWIN L.—Age, 18 years.. Enlisted at Hornellsville, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Co. C, August 13, 1861; mustered out, June 7, 1865, near Washington, D. C. ADAMS, GEORGE S.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted, February 20, 1862, at Geneseo, to serve three years; mustered in as bugler, Co. C, April 2, 1862; discharged for disability, November 28, 1862, at Brooks Station, Ya. ADAMS, PATRICK.—Age, 23 years. Enlisted at Buffalo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. I, August 5, 1863; mustered out with company, July 17, 1865, near Wash• ington, D. C. ADAMS, WALTER W.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted, January 7, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as corporal, Co. H, February 13, 1862; deserted, June 11, 1862, at Catletts Station, Ya. AKIN, ALGEREY.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. E, February 7, 1862; deserted, November 20, 1862, near Wrarrenton, Ya. AKIN, JAMES H.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. F, December 2, 1861; discharged to date September T, 1862. AKIN, WILLIAM.—Age, 10 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. F, December 5, 1861; discharged for disability, June 1.6, 1862, at Falls Church, Ya. 880 REPORT OF THE ADJUTANT-GENERAL. ALDRIDGE, ALBERT.—Age, 16 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mnstered in as drummer, Co. —, De• cember 26,1861 j mustered out, March 8, 1862, on consolidation. ALLEN, AMI.—Age, 17 years. Enlisted at Southport, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Co. G, August 13, 1861; mustered out with detachment, June 7, 1865, near Washing• ton, D. C. ALLEN, DANIEL.—Age, 22 years. Enlisted at Alfred, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. C, July 13, 1863; mustered out with company, July 17, 1865, near Washington, D. C, as Daniel J. ALLEN, HORATIO N.—Age, 11 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. G, February 25, 1862; discharged for disability., July 20, 1862, at Washing• ton, D. C. ALLEN, JOHN.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted at Buffalo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. B, August 7, 1863; deserted, October 12, 1863, at Rapidan, Va. ALLEN, RENSSELAER.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. F, Febru• ary 5, 1862; re-enlisted as a veteran, February 28, 1861; wounded in action, June 20, 1801, near Petersburg, Va.; dis• charged for disability, January 30, 1865. ALSAVER, PETER.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted, December 12, 1861, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co. K, December 27, 1861; deserted, October 13, 1863, at Rap• pahannock, Va. AMES, ALBERT.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. D, January 30, 1862; discharged for disability, September 1, 1862. ANDERSON, ERASTUS.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted at Rochester, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. I, August 16,1861; absent, sick, in hospital since October 28,1861, and at muster-out of company. ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTH INFANTRY. 881 ANDERSON, JAMES.-^Age, 25 years. Enlisted, February 14, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Go. I, March 8, 1862; deserted, May 27, 1862, at Manassas, Va.; arrested, November 21, 1863; absent in arrest, October, 1864; no further record. ANDREWS, ANDREW J.—Age, 26 years. Enrolled at Gen• eseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as first sergeant, Oo. C, October 9, 1861; promoted second lieutenant, September 17, 1862; died, January 26, 1863, from wounds received in action at Fredericksburg, Va.; also borne as Andrus. Commissioned second lieutenant, October 21, 1862, with rank from September 17, 186% vice N. J. Wing, promoted. ANDREWS, CHRISTIAN, see Andrew Christie. ANDREWS, GEORGE.—Age, 24 years. Enlisted at Troy, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. H, December 23, 1861; deserted, January 1, 1862, at Troy, N. Y. ANGEE, CHARLES H.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. G, Feb• ruary 25, 1862; deserted, May 27, 1862, at Manassas, Va. ARMSTRONG, JAMES J.—Age, 23 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. G, Novem• ber 2, 1861; deserted, February 6, 1862, at Geneseo, N. Y. ARMSTRONG, JAMES W.—Age, 22 years. .Enlisted at Gen• eseo, to serve three years; mustered in as sergeant, Go. D, Oc• tober 18, 1861; deserted, September 5, 1862, at Washington, D. C, ARMSTRONG, JOHN H.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. D, Janu• ary 12,1862; deserted, June 21, 1862, at Weaverville, Va. ATKINS, WILLIAM H.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Troy, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. H, Decem• ber 27, 1861; discharged, February 7, 1865, at Elmira, N. Yr. AUSTIN, ALONZO.—Age, 22 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. D, October 18, 1861; wounded in action, August 30, 1862, at Manassas, Va.; discharged for disability, October 3, 1862. 56 882 REPORT OF THE ADJUTANT-GENERAL. AUSTIN, SILAS.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co A, January 4, 1862; wounded in action, July 1, 1863, at Gettysburg, Pa.; absent since wounded, and in hospital, at muster-out of com• pany. AVERILL, STEPHEN.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted at Geneseo^ to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. D, Decem• ber 5, 1861; deserted, July 26, 1862, at Warrenton, Va. AVERY, HENRY.—Age, IS years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. D, October 7, 1.861; deserted, November 28, 1861; arrested and returned to regiment, September 22, 1863; again deserted, October 13, 1863, at Rapidan, Va. AYRES, JR., JOEL W.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted at Bingham- ton, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. H, July 17, 1863; promoted sergeant, May 20, 1S65; mustered out with company, July 17, 1865, near Washington, D. C. Commissioned, not mustered, second lieutenant, December 8,1861, with rank from same date, vice W. J. Starks, resigned. BACKMAN, COURTLAND.—Age, 19 years Enlisted, Febru• ary 15, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co. K, March 8, 1862; deserted, March 28, 1862, at Troy, N. Y. BACON, ALBERT P.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Canesteo, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Co. C, August 17, 1864; mustered out, June 7, 1865, near Washington, D. C. BADGLY, DAYTON H.—Age, 36 years. Enlisted, January 15, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co K, March S, 1862; deserted, August 30, 1862; returned, March 21, 1863; missing in action, July 1, 1863, at Gettysburg, Pa.; no further record. BAGLEY, WILLIAM.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Troy, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co H, Decem• ber 23, 1861; deserted, December 27, 1861, at Troy, N. Y. BAILY, WILLIAM.—Age, 26 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. E, Octo• ber 23, 1861; discharged for disability, December 3, 1862, at Brooks Station, Va.- ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTH INFANTRY. 883 BAKER, see Barker. BAKER, OHAUNCEY.—Age, 38 years. Enlisted, January 17, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Oo. K, February 28, 1862; deserted, March 8, 1862, at Troy, N. Y. BAKER, HENRY.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted, February 18, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co. K, March 8, 1862; promoted corporal, December 13, 1862; wounded in action, July 1, 1863, at Gettysburg, Pa.; absent, wounded, and in hospital at muster-out of company. BAKER, JOHN A.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted, January 16, 1862, at Troy, to serve three years; mustered in as private, Co. I, March 8, 1862; wounded in action, September 17, 1862, at Antietam, Md.; discharged for disability, January 18, 1863, at Baltimore, Md. BANCROFT, NELSON D.—Age, 19 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as fifer, Go. D, October 21, 1861; deserted, August 20, 1862, at Alexandria, Va. BANGS, DANIEL.—Age, 32 years. Enlisted at Troy, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co. I, December 28, 1861; deserted, August 1, 1862, at Waterloo, Va., as David. BANKER, JOHN.—Age, 18 years. Enlisted at Norwich, to serve one year, and mustered in as private, Go. F, August 19, 1864; absent, sick in hospital, since October 21, 1864, and at muster-out of company. BARBER, CHARLES.—Age, 35 years. Enlisted at Geneseo, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Go. A, Octo• ber 8, 1861; wounded in action, May 12, 1864, at Spotsylvania, Va.; discharged, October 31, 1864. BARBER, FRANCIS.—Age, 38 years. Enlisted at Lockport, to serve three years, and mustered in as private, Co I, August 25, 1861; deserted, October 25, 1864, near Petersburg, Va., as Barker.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Come on Lads”
    “COME ON LADS” ON “COME “COME ON LADS” Old Wesley Collegians and the Gallipoli Campaign Philip J Powell Philip J Powell FOREWORD Congratulations, Philip Powell, for producing this short history. It brings to life the experiences of many Old Boys who died at Gallipoli and some who survived, only to be fatally wounded in the trenches or no-man’s land of the western front. Wesley annually honoured these names, even after the Second World War was over. The silence in Adamson Hall as name after name was read aloud, almost like a slow drum beat, is still in the mind, some seventy or more years later. The messages written by these young men, or about them, are evocative. Even the more humdrum and everyday letters capture, above the noise and tension, the courage. It is as if the soldiers, though dead, are alive. Geoffrey Blainey AC (OW1947) Front cover image: Anzac Cove - 1915 Australian War Memorial P10505.001 First published March 2015. This electronic edition updated February 2017. Copyright by Philip J Powell and Wesley College © ISBN: 978-0-646-93777-9 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................. 2 Map of Gallipoli battlefields ........................................................ 4 The Real Anzacs .......................................................................... 5 Chapter 1. The Landing ............................................................... 6 Chapter 2. Helles and the Second Battle of Krithia ..................... 14 Chapter 3. Stalemate #1 ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Chapters 4-7 Burns
    76 CHAPTER 4 THE REALITY BEHIND THE BRISBANE LINE ALLEGATIONS Curtin lacked expertise in defence matters. He did not understand the duties or responsibilities of military commanders and never attended Chiefs of Staff meetings, choosing to rely chiefly on the Governments public service advisers. Thus Shedden established himself as Curtins chief defence adviser. Under Curtin his influence was far greater than 1 it had ever been in Menzies day. Curtins lack of understanding of the role of military commanders, shared by Forde, created misunderstandings and brought about refusal to give political direction. These factors contributed to events that underlay the Brisbane Line controversy. Necessarily, Curtin had as his main purpose the fighting and the winning of the war. Some Labor politicians however saw no reason why the conduct of the war should prevent Labor introducing social reforms. Many, because of their anti-conscriptionist beliefs, were unsympathetic 2 to military needs. Conversely, the Army Staff Corps were mistrustful of their new masters. The most influential of their critics was Eddie Ward, the new Minister for Labour and National Service. His hatred of Menzies, distrust of the conservative parties, and suspicion of the military impelled him towards endangering national security during the course of the Brisbane Line controversy. But this lay in the future in the early days of the Curtin Government. Not a great deal changed immediately under Curtin. A report to Forde by Mackay on 27 October indicated that appreciations and planning for local defence in Queensland and New South Wales were based on the assumption that the vital area of Newcastle-Sydney-Port Kembla had priority in defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 1
    *^b THE BOOK OF THE STATES .\ • I January, 1949 "'Sto >c THE COUNCIL OF STATE'GOVERNMENTS CHICAGO • ••• • • ••'. •" • • • • • 1 ••• • • I* »• - • • . * • ^ • • • • • • 1 ( • 1* #* t 4 •• -• ', 1 • .1 :.• . -.' . • - •>»»'• • H- • f' ' • • • • J -•» J COPYRIGHT, 1949, BY THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS jk •J . • ) • • • PBir/Tfili i;? THE'UNIfTED STATES OF AMERICA S\ A ' •• • FOREWORD 'he Book of the States, of which this volume is a supplement, is designed rto provide an authoritative source of information on-^state activities, administrations, legislatures, services, problems, and progressi It also reports on work done by the Council of State Governments, the cpm- missions on interstate cooperation, and other agencies concepned with intergovernmental problems. The present suppkinent to the 1948-1949 edition brings up to date, on the basis of information receivjed.from the states by the end of Novem­ ber, 1948^, the* names of the principal elective administrative officers of the states and of the members of their legislatures. Necessarily, most of the lists of legislators are unofficial, final certification hot having been possible so soon after the election of November 2. In some cases post­ election contests were pending;. However, every effort for accuracy has been made by state officials who provided the lists aiid by the CouncJLl_ of State Governments. » A second 1949. supplement, to be issued in July, will list appointive administrative officers in all the states, and also their elective officers and legislators, with any revisions of the. present rosters that may be required. ^ Thus the basic, biennial ^oo/t q/7^? States and its two supplements offer comprehensive information on the work of state governments, and current, convenient directories of the men and women who constitute those governments, both in their administrative organizations and in their legislatures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 Karl James University of Wollongong James, Karl, The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945, PhD thesis, School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 2005. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from University of Wollongong by Karl James, BA (Hons) School of History and Politics 2005 i CERTIFICATION I, Karl James, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, is wholly my work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Karl James 20 July 2005 ii Table of Contents Maps, List of Illustrations iv Abbreviations vi Conversion viii Abstract ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1 ‘We have got to play our part in it’. Australia’s land war until 1944. 15 2 ‘History written is history preserved’. History’s treatment of the Final Campaigns. 30 3 ‘Once the soldier had gone to war he looked for leadership’. The men of the II Australian Corps. 51 4 ‘Away to the north of Queensland, On the tropic shores of hell, Stand grimfaced men who watch and wait, For a future none can tell’. The campaign takes shape: Torokina and the Outer Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • John Curtin's War
    backroom briefings John Curtin's war CLEM LLOYD & RICHARD HALL backroom briefings John Curtin's WAR edited by CLEM LLOYD & RICHARD HALL from original notes compiled by Frederick T. Smith National Library of Australia Canberra 1997 Front cover: Montage of photographs of John Curtin, Prime Minister of Australia, 1941-45, and of Old Parliament House, Canberra Photographs from the National Library's Pictorial Collection Back cover: Caricature of John Curtin by Dubois Bulletin, 8 October 1941 Published by the National Library of Australia Canberra ACT 2600 © National Library of Australia 1997 Introduction and annotations © Clem Lloyd and Richard Hall Every reasonable endeavour has been made to contact relevant copyright holders of illustrative material. Where this has not proved possible, the copyright holders are invited to contact the publisher. National Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data Backroom briefings: John Curtin's war. Includes index. ISBN 0 642 10688 6. 1. Curtin, John, 1885-1945. 2. World War, 1939-1945— Press coverage—Australia. 3. Journalism—Australia. I. Smith, FT. (Frederick T.). II. Lloyd, C.J. (Clement John), 1939- . III. Hall, Richard, 1937- . 940.5394 Editor: Julie Stokes Designer: Beverly Swifte Picture researcher/proofreader: Tony Twining Printed by Goanna Print, Canberra Published with the assistance of the Lloyd Ross Forum CONTENTS Fred Smith and the secret briefings 1 John Curtin's war 12 Acknowledgements 38 Highly confidential: press briefings, June 1942-January 1945 39 Introduction by F.T. Smith 40 Chronology of events; Briefings 42 Index 242 rederick Thomas Smith was born in Balmain, Sydney, Fon 18 December 1904, one of a family of two brothers and two sisters.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Wall of Honor
    WORLD WAR II WALL OF HONOR WINCHESTER WALL OF HONOR – Participating in the national effort of the Spirit of ’45 to photo-document the veterans of WWII, Winchester’s World War II 75th Anniversary Committee has compiled a Winchester Wall of Honor. Shown below is the collection to date. Residents and veterans’ families are invited and encouraged to contribute photos of veterans who enlisted from Winchester for both the local and national walls. On parade 1949 On parade 1950 An early version of the project displayed in Winchester Town Hall. The “wall” will be kept as Although the Wall of Honor does not include all who a digital supplement to the enlisted from Winchester, new photos may be contributed WWII veterans database. to photo-document further service men and women. Information about the people pictured is also welcome. The photos below have come from yearbooks, archival photo collections, newspapers, the Internet, and families. Although photographs of service men and women in uniform were preferred, many school photographs and a few of men in the uniforms of the Fire Department have been used with an effort to show the men and women as close to the age of enlistment as possible. The project, though designed for the 75th Anniversary of WWII, is still open to the contribution of further photographs, all to be kept in the Winchester Archival Center, which also has a database of all known veterans who enlisted from Winchester. TO CONTRIBUTE PHOTOGRAPHS: please e-mail scans to [email protected] or bring in photos during Archival Center open hours for copying.
    [Show full text]
  • 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.]
    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS December 5, 2005 [Cite as 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.] MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS On December 2, 2005, the Supreme Court issued orders suspending 13,800 attorneys for noncompliance with Gov.Bar R. VI, which requires attorneys to file a Certificate of Registration and pay applicable fees on or before September 1, 2005. The text of the entry imposing the suspension is reproduced below. This is followed by a list of the attorneys who were suspended. The list includes, by county, each attorney’s Attorney Registration Number. Because an attorney suspended pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI can be reinstated upon application, an attorney whose name appears below may have been reinstated prior to publication of this notice. Please contact the Attorney Registration Section at 614/387-9320 to determine the current status of an attorney whose name appears below. In re Attorney Registration Suspension : ORDER OF [Attorney Name] : SUSPENSION Respondent. : : [Registration Number] : Gov.Bar R. VI(1)(A) requires all attorneys admitted to the practice of law in Ohio to file a Certificate of Registration for the 2005/2007 attorney registration biennium on or before September 1, 2005. Section 6(A) establishes that an attorney who fails to file the Certificate of Registration on or before September 1, 2005, but pays within ninety days of the deadline, shall be assessed a late fee. Section 6(B) provides that an attorney who fails to file a Certificate of Registration and pay the fees either timely or within the late registration period shall be notified of noncompliance and that if the attorney fails to file evidence of compliance with Gov.Bar R.
    [Show full text]
  • Hero Or Deserter? Gordon Bennett and the Tragic Defeat of the 8Th Division
    USI Vol68 No4 Dect17_USI Vol55 No4/2005 28/11/2017 8:05 pm Page 25 BOOK REVIEW: Hero or deserter? Gordon Bennett and the tragic defeat of the 8th Division by Roger Maynard Penguin Random House: Docklands, VIC; 2017; 374 pp; ISBN 9780143783923 (paperback); RRP $34.99; Ursula Davidson Library call number 588.14 MAYN 2017 Roger Maynard has produced a most worthy study of Maynard does not fully cover Bennett’s post-war activities. two of the most tragic and controversial events in Bennett served as the second controller of the Ku-ring-gai Australian military history. These events, which occurred Civil Defence Unit (now a State Emergency Services Unit) during World War II, are: (1) the surrender of the 8th from 1957 (the year he turned 70) to 19602. This was after Australian Division to the Japanese in Malaya in February his first heart attack; and when the nation was concerned 1942 and the subsequent treatment of its members while about nuclear warfare and needed to develop doctrine Japanese prisoners-of-war; and (2) the flight (escape and plans against nuclear weapons. Bennett died on 1 back to Australia) of its commander, Major-General August 1962. Gordon Bennett, without the permission of his British Some currently-serving officers, drawing on their commander, Lieutenant-General Arthur Percival. recent experiences, provide Maynard with their insights Before his escape, Bennett had played a prominent into Bennett’s actions. I feel that attitudes against Bennett role in the defence of Malaya and Singapore. A colourful have hardened since the events of 75 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions Led by Donkeys? Brigade Commanders of the Australian Imperial Force, 1914-1918
    LIONS LED BY DONKEYS? BRIGADE COMMANDERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN IMPERIAL FORCE, 1914-1918. ASHLEIGH BROWN A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy University of New South Wales, Canberra School of Humanities and Social Sciences March 2017 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Brown First name: Ashleigh Other name/s: Rebecca Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: MPhil School: Humanities and Social Sciences Faculty: UNSW Canberra, AD FA Title: Lions led by donkeys? Brigade commanders of the Australian Imperial Force, 1914-1918. Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) Australian First World War historiography tends to focus on the ordinary soldier: his background, character and involvement in the war. This is a legacy left by Charles Bean who, following the history from below approach, believed in the need for soldiers’ stories to be told. On the other end of the spectrum, attention is given to political leaders and the British high command. British commanders and, by extension, other Allied commanders are too often portrayed as poor leaders who were reluctant to adapt to modern warfare, and did not demonstrate a sense of responsibility for the men under their command. The evidence shows that this perception is not accurate. A comprehensive understanding of the progression of Australian forces on the Western Front cannot be gained without investigating the progression of those in command. This thesis examines the brigade commanders of the Australian Imperial Force who held that level of command for a substantial period while on the Western Front.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Anzac Corps and the Battle of Pozières Ridge, 1916
    1st Anzac Corps and the Battle of Pozières Ridge, 1916 Meleah Elizabeth Hampton Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy University of Adelaide Department of History April 2014 i Abstract The first major action of the 1st Anzac Corps on the Western Front was the Battle of Pozières Ridge, which was conducted from 23 July to 3 September 1916. During this time the three divisions of 1st Anzac Corps rotated in and out of the line twice, each time conducting one or more offensive operations against heavily-defended German positions. At its conclusion, the fighting around Pozières and Mouquet Farm had to its record a very high casualty rate for only the most modest of territorial gains. This thesis examines the series of operations conducted by 1st Anzac Corps during the six weeks of the Battle of Pozières Ridge. These operations are more representative of the Somme than the large attacks like the ill-fated first day or the night attacks of 14-15 July. On any given day during the Battle of the Somme only a small percentage of the line was engaged in fighting the enemy – almost invariably in the same kind of limited, set-piece attacks made by 1st Anzac Corps at Pozières and Mouquet Farm. The particular focus of this thesis is on the agency of mid to low levels of command in the military hierarchy during this battle. Detailed reports, orders and message of the battle survive in the archives in the Australian War Memorial which are in so many cases simply unavailable for other contemporary British or Dominion formations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Singapore – an Alternative View Bill Edgar
    The Fall of Singapore – an alternative view Bill Edgar General Percival was not a driving personality. The man on whom much of the blame has fallen for the disastrous fall of Singapore on the 15th February 1942, was a calm and precise administrator, well qualified to take command. Gordon Bennett, one of his divisional commanders, later wrote: This officer was typical of the best produced by the Staff College. He was well skilled in the science of war - war establishments, equipment and tactical methods as taught in our textbooks. His appreciation of the situation was sound and his plan of action and his troop distribution beyond criticism … He knew Malaya and its problems and was probably the best selection for the appointment to command the land forces there. 1 In fact Percival had been sent to Singapore in 1936 as the first General Staff Officer, First Grade, at Headquarters, Malaya Command. He joined a team whose task it was to develop the defences of Singapore. Percival travelled widely, visiting all units while studying the region carefully. At the conclusion of his period there he drew up an appreciation and plan for an attack on Singapore from the Japanese point of view. When he returned home to England he handed it over to the War Office. 'The plan of attack which he envisaged did not differ very materially from that adopted by the Japanese when they attacked Malaya four years later.' 2 So, what went wrong in late 1941 and early 1942? Quite obviously a great deal. But does Percival so completely deserve the many and manifold scathing
    [Show full text]
  • Signing Off on the State
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 3-2009 Signing off on the state Amanda J. Allerding Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Art Practice Commons, Australian Studies Commons, History Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Allerding, A. J. (2009). Signing off on the state. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/130 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/130 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]