DOCSLIB.ORG

Technology Assessment of Ataturk Dam and HEPP in Turkey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Technology assessment of Ataturk dam and HEPP in Turkey Bal, R. Award date: 1994 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF ATATURK DAM AND HEPP in Turkey Rasit BAL ind.nr:325467 November, 1993 TU-Eindhoven Coord.:Dr. Lex Lemmens Preface The following study has been applied as a part of the Master of Science course 'Technological Development Sciences" at the Technica! University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands. This study is meant to get the "Master of Science" degree. I would like to thank Dr. L. Lemmens for his advice. Furthermore I would like to thank to the staff of the GAP Administration in Ankara and in Sanliurfa, especially to : M. Yildirir, M. Acikgoz, E. Alemdaroglu, C. Cevheri, Okan, R. Ozer, 0. Santay and ethers in Sanliurfa. Talks and discussions with them were very informative. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduetion 1 Chapter 2 Turkey . 4 2.1 History . 4 2.2 Economie development . 5 Chapter 3 Southeastern Anatolia Region . 8 3.1 Introduetion . 8 3.2 Geographical location and Climate . 9 3.3 Natural Resources . 11 3.4 Sanliurfa Province . 15 3.4.1 Society Description . 15 3.4.1.1 Kinship . 15 3.4.1.2 Religion . 16 3.4. 1.3 Politics . 18 3.4.1.4 Education . 19 3.4.1.5 Economics . 19 Chapter 4. Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) . 24 4. 1 Introduetion . 24 4.2 The Project . 25 4.2. 1 History . 25 4.2.2 The Project and the Region's development . 26 4.2.3 GAP Master Plan . 27 4.2.3. 1 Objectives and strategies of the Project . 28 4.3 The original GAP Projects . 32 4.4 Lower Firat project . 34 4.4.1 Ataturk Dam and HEPP . 35 4.4.1.1 Hydroelectric Power Plant . 36 4.4.1.2 lrrigation Schemes . 36 4.4.1.2.1 Sanliurfa Tunnels . 36 4.4.1.2.2 On-farm lrrigation Projects . 37 4.5 Definition and Beunding . 39 Chapter 5 Technology Assessment . 40 5.1 Introduetion . 40 5.2 Technology and Society . 40 5.3 Definition and Components of TA . 41 5.3. 1 Problem definition and Beunding . 42 5.3.2 Technology Description and Foracasting . 42 5.3.3 Social Description and terecasting . 43 5.3.4. Impact Assessment . 43 5.3.4. 1 Economie Impacts . 44 5.3.4.2 Social Impacts . 45 5.3.4.3 Environmental Impacts . 45 5.3.4.4 Politica! Impacts . 46 5.3.4.5 Technological Impacts . 46 5.4 Methad used in this study . 47 5.4.1 Evaluation Method: Multicriteria evaluation . 47 Chapter 6 Analysis of the project aims formulated in the Master Plan . 49 6.1 Introduetion . 49 6.2 General approach . 50 6.2.1 Development Problems . 50 6.2.2 Development Objectives . 52 6.2.3 Development Strategy . 52 6.3 Specified analysis . 53 6.3.1 Economie aims . 53 6.3.2 Social aims . 58 6.3.3 Politica! aims . 61 6.4 Genelusion . 63 Chapter 7 Analysis of the Impacts . 65 7.1 Introduetion . 65 7.2 Impact ldentification . 65 7.2.1 lmplementation period . 66 7.2.2 After construction . 66 7.2.2.1 Lake . 66 7.2.2.2 Water to lrrigate . 67 7 .2.2.3 Electric Energy . 69 7.3 Impact Analysis . 70 7 .3.1 Ou ring the implementation . 70 7.3.2 After construction . 75 7 .3.2. 1 Lake . 76 7.3.2.2 Water to lrrigate . 79 7.3.2.3 Electric Energy . 98 Chapter 8 Impact Evaluation ............................................ 100 8.1 Introduetion . 100 8.2 Evaluation Methad .................................... 100 8.3 Impact presentation . 101 8.3.1 Presentation . 102 8.3.1. 1 The aimed impacts ....................... 102 8.3.1.2 Impacts during implementation ............... 102 8.3.1.3 Impact after construction ................... 103 8.4 Evaluation . 106 8.4.1 Project aims .................................. 106 8.4.2 lmplementation period ........................... 106 8.4.3 After the implementation . 107 Chapter 9. Conclusions and Ramarks . 11 0 Raferences . 112 Chapter 1. Introduetion Since the establishment of the Turkish Republic, the main objective of each subsequent government was to develop Turkey toa modern country. During its development the country was divided into two economical parts. The western part of Turkey which is relatively well developed, and the eastern part which is legged behind and remained more or less traditional. Southeast Anatolia is a region which is situated in the eastern part of the county. During the sixties, a start has been made to develop the eastern part of the country. The Southeast Anatolia has many potantials to be exploited. Two biggest rivers (Firat and Dicle) of the country pass the region and stream into the neighbour countries. Beside this two big rivers, the region also have many potantials of arabie land. Thousands of year it was nat possible tobring this potential tagether in order to mobilize them for the region's people. During this long time, the agriculture of the region was traditional:dryfarming which is toa dependent on the climatologic conditions. lt has low yield, no erop rotations, erop per 2 years (fellow). These are the main characters of the agriculture of the region. On the ether hand the region is also nat industrialized. The region has no industry at all. To develop the region a project has been developed. The project has been called the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP). This project has been developed by DSI (Directorate of State Hydraulic Works). lt is a combination of 13 major projects primarily concerning irrigation and hydrapower generation. The project envisages the construction of 22 dams and 17 hydrapower plants on the Firat and the Dicle rivers and their tributaries. This project will provide enough water to irrigate 1.6 million hectare arabie land. Most favourite project of the GAP is the Lower Flrat Project. This project consist of many individual projects to irrigate an area of 7 hundred thousand hectare. These are: the Ataturk DAM and HEPP (Hydroelectric Power Plant), the Sanliurfa Tunnels that have a lengthof 26.4 kilometre, and many on-farm irrigation schemes to carry water trom the dam to the arabie land. At present Ataturk dam and HEPP are almast completed. In 1994, when the Sanliurfa Tunnels and on-farm irrigations schemes are completed, the irrigation will start in Sanliurfa-Harran Plains. On the ether hand, Ataturk HEPP have already been started with the production of the electric energy. Four generators of eight are already installed and operational. Such a giant project will be constructed in a more or less traditional society. The construction of this new project means that a new technology is going to be introduced in this society. lt is evident to foresee that the new technology will effect the socio-economie situation of the region. From the experience in past, a certain technology introduced in a context will cause many changes. Same of these changes are foreseen and intended, and some of these are nat indented andjor undesired. To identify these effects, a evaluation methad has been developed, mainly in the USA This evaluation methad is called Technology Assessment (TA). This methad has developed several techniques to identify, to analyze, and to 1 evaluate the impacts of a certain technology in a given socio-economie situation. This technique aims to identify the unexpected and undesired effects of the technology going to be introduced in order to minimize the negative effects of the technology. When this study was planned, the expectation was that in would be possible to have access to the most of technological.
Recommended publications
  • Southeast Anatolia Project (Gap) Regional Development Administration Coverage

    Southeast Anatolia Project (Gap) Regional Development Administration Coverage

    SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT (GAP) REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION COVERAGE • SOUTHEAST ANATOLIA PROJECT(GAP) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2008-2012) • GAP ACTON PLAN (2014-2018) • GAP REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION (GAP RDA) • INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES • COMPETITIVE AGENDA GAP REGION TURKEY – GAP COMPARISION TURKEY GAP GAP/TR (%) Total Area (km2) 779 452 75 193 9.7 Population (milyon)* 77.69 8.25 10.6 Annual Population Growth Rate 13.31 18.88 (thousand)(2013-2014) * 2014 Results of Address Based Population Registration System LAND POTENTIAL TOTAL AREA GAP REGION OTHER 9.7 % 90.3 % ECONOMICALLY IRRIGABLE AREA GAP REGION 20.0 % OTHER 80.0 % TURKEY’S WATER POTANTIAL BY BASIN Euphrates-Tigris 28 72 Other EUPHRATES OTHER 17% 47% TIGRIS 11% EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN WESTERN ANTALYA EASTERN 6% BLACK SEA 6% BLACK SEA 5% 8% DEVELOPMENT STAGES of GAP •1936 Establishment of Electrical Power Resources Survey and Development Administration •1960 The studies on Euphrates and Tigris rivers •1977 Bringing together all studies under GAP (GAP Water based Development Project Package) • 1986 State Planning Organization (SPO) as coordinating body for the integrated regional development project of GAP • 1989 GAP Master Plan • 1989 Establishment of the GAP Regional Development Administration • 2002 GAP Regional Development Plan (2002-2010) • 2008 GAP Action Plan (2008-2012) • 2014 GAP Action Plan (2014-2018) GAP WATER and SOIL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME EUPHRATES TIGRIS Karakaya Dam/HPP Dicle - Kralkızı Aşağı Fırat Batman Sınır Fırat Batman - Silvan Suruc – Baziki Garzan Adıyaman – Kahta Ilısu Adıyaman–Göksu–Araban Cizre Gaziantep Total water potential of Turkey :186 billion m³. 32 billion m³ from Euphrates and 21 billion m³ from Tigris, GAP Region 53 billion m³.
  • Optimisation of the Tigris River Hydropower System Operations

    Optimisation of the Tigris River Hydropower System Operations

    OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY EMRAH YALÇIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MAY 2015 Approval of the thesis: OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS submitted by EMRAH YALÇIN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner Head of Department, Civil Engineering Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek Supervisor, Civil Engineering Dept., Batman University Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. A. Melih Yanmaz Civil Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek Civil Engineering Dept., Batman University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elçin Kentel Civil Engineering Dept., METU Asst. Prof. Dr. Önder Koçyiğit Civil Engineering Dept., Gazi University Asst. Prof. Dr. Aslı Numanoğlu Genç Civil Engineering Dept., Atılım University Date: 22.05.2015 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Emrah Yalçın Signature : iv ABSTRACT OPTIMISATION OF THE TIGRIS RIVER HYDROPOWER SYSTEM OPERATIONS Yalçın, Emrah Ph.D., Department of Civil Engineering Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şahnaz Tiğrek May 2015, 146 pages Growing external energy dependence and rising oil prices are encouraging Turkey to turn to renewable energy, especially hydropower.
  • The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey

    The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey

    ©2020 Published in 8th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science 23-25 October 2020 (ISITES2020 Bursa - Turkey) https://doi.org/10.33793/acperpro.03.01.51 The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey Haluk BALI1*, Salih ALCAY2 1 The General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, 5. Regional Directorate, 56. Division Office, Kırıkkale, Turkey, 2 Necmettin Erbakan University, Engineering and Achitecture Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey. Abstract Turkey is a very rich country in terms of water resources. However, in order to use these resources efficiently, water must be stored safely. In this context, the best form of storage is the construction of dams. In our country, large dams, which are among the world's important dams, are being built. Although there are many advantages of large dams, the loss of life and property will be so great in case of a possible deformation or destruction. The fact that dams are under the influence of various forces, as well as being located in the earthquake zone of our country, necessitates continuous monitoring of our dams. Dams are generally monitored using geodetic methods and geotechnical devices. However, mostly details of these two methods are evaluated separately in dam monitoring. Evaluating the results of both methods together is very important for the comprehensive monitoring of the dam and the correct interpretation of possible deformations. In this study, large dams in our country and monitoring studies carried out by using geodetic and geotechnical methods in these dams are given in detail. Key words: Dam, Deformation Monitoring, Geodetic, Geotechnical 1.
  • Mardin from Tales to Legends 2

    Mardin from Tales to Legends 2

    1 MARDİN FROM TALES TO LEGENDS 2 künye 3 MARDİN FROM TALES TO LEGENDS 4 Introduction Mesopotamia is among those few names in the world that almost everyone is familiar with. Think of a region that is the birthplace of many tools, philosophies, systems and religions. Think of a region that so much that it pioneered has been adopted throughout the world and has played such an important role in shaping everyday lives. Imagine a place which witnessed so much for the first time: first writing system, first state, first city, first water irrigation sysems, first law and many more. Mardin situated right at the centre of this incredibly rich region can therefore be seen as a fortunate city, blessed in history. It has Anatolia on one side and Mesopotamia on the other, an ancient region which transported so many innovations that had originated in the Middle East to the western world. Despite the common assumption, the word Mesopotamia is not of Middle Eastern origin. It comes from the ancient Greek root words mesos (middle) and potamia (rivers) literally meaning “(land) between rivers.” It is curious that although writing was introduced in the region almost 3000 years earlier than in Greece, the region’s name is of Greek origin rather than a Middle Eastern language. In Syriac, Mesopotamia is called Beth Nahrin. Composed of the words beth (house, land) and nahrin (two rivers), it literally means “the land of/between two rivers.” Based on this, it can be deduced that the region was named not by the Greek civilizations of the west but by the people of the region themselves.
  • Gnalić Shipw - Reck, Which Sank Far from Anatolian Shores, but Has Very Strong Relations with Anatolia

    Gnalić Shipw - Reck, Which Sank Far from Anatolian Shores, but Has Very Strong Relations with Anatolia

    2 G : R R O E . K B R N U U t a M N I - t . 4 w 1 w 0 w TINA 2 Maritime Archaeology Periodical TINA MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGY PERIODICAL APP IS NOW AVAILABLE AT APPLE APP STORE You can explore tINa Maritime archaeology Periodical free with the iPad application. a richer content with previously unpublished photographs and thematic videos for your enjoyment. Just write Maritime archaeology in the search window of the app Store. TINA Maritime Archaeology Periodical tINa tURKISH UNDERwatER aRCHaEOLOGY FOUNDatION FOUNDatION Founded by a group of maritime-lover businessmen in 1999. SCOPE l To make the international society and scientists familiar with our abundant archaeological cultural heritage in Turkey and its seas. With this idea in mind, to make national and international publications, and organize conferences, panels, seminars, forums, symposiums, workshops, fairs, festivities, exhibitions, and artistic activities such as festivals, excursions and meetings. l To support local and international scientific institutions, museums, and universities involved in activities of surveys, excavations, conservations and exhibitions under the approval and inspection of the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism. l To perform underwater surveys and excavations in our seas using scientific methods and current technological facilities under the approval and inspection of the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism. l To identify the archaeological artifacts lying underwater, reporting their whereabouts to relevant authorities for protection. l To seek cooperation with the museums and institutions involved in the field and support their activities. To ensure enhancement of such museums and cultural activities, and take necessary steps to provide opportunities for new initiatives.
  • Impact of Ataturk Dam on Regional Rainfall

    Impact of Ataturk Dam on Regional Rainfall

    IMPACT OF ATATURK DAM ON REGIONAL RAINFALL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCES OF NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY By AIMABLE KAYITAKIRE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering NICOSIA, 2016 Aimable KAYITAKIRE: IMPACT OF ATATURK DAM ON REGIONAL RAINFALL Approval of Director of Graduate School of Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. İlkay SALİHOĞLU We certify this thesis is satisfactory for the award of the degree of Masters of Science in Civil Engineering Examining Committee in Charge: Ass Prof. Dr. Burhan Yιldɩz Committee Member, Civil Engineering Department, CIU Ass Prof. Dr. Kabir Sadeghi Committee Member, Civil Engineering Department, NEU. Prof. Dr. Ata ATUN Supervisor, Civil Engineering Department, NEU. I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with the academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all materials and results that are not original to this work. Name, last name: Signature: Date: ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Ata Atun for the useful comments, remarks and engagement through the learning process of this master thesis. I express my special heartfelt gratitude to my family, which directly or indirectly has contributed to accomplish my research work. iv To my lovely family … v ABSTRACT Many natural resources are more often than not seasonal or at least depend on some certain environmental factors for abundance fluctuation; one of these important natural resources is water.
  • U. , Rafetus Euphraticus, in Southeastern Anatolia,"T Turkey, with Observations on Biology and Factors Endangering Its Survival Enrln Tasrlvarrlnn Mnnunr K

    U. , Rafetus Euphraticus, in Southeastern Anatolia,"T Turkey, with Observations on Biology and Factors Endangering Its Survival Enrln Tasrlvarrlnn Mnnunr K

    tkut Cd6enotiut dnd Amlogr', 1998. 3 Distribution and Habitats rffififfiHn"r, to"u. , Rafetus euphraticus, in Southeastern Anatolia,"t Turkey, with Observations on Biology and Factors Endangering its Survival Enrln TasrlvarrlNn Mnnunr K. AurUn2 lEge Universitesi, Su Ariinleri Faktiltesi, Temel Bilimler Biililmil Balikgitik Anabilim Dali, Bontova, Izmir 35100 Turket, I F a-r : 90 - 2 3 2 - 3 6 867 ] 4 ; E - mail : t as kav ak @ s ufak. e g e. e d u. t r I ; )Ege Universitesi, Fen Faktiltesi, Hidrobiyotoji Anabilim Dali, Bornova, Izmir 35100 Turkey Ansrnlcr. - The Euphrates softshell tartle, Rafetus euphraticrs, largely confined to the Euphrates and Tigris basins, is a thermophilic species. It prefers relatively calm tributaries and oxbow lakes. Itis largely carnivorous, butsometimes consumes plantmaterial. The northernmost limit ofits range in Turkey in the Euphrates basin is between Karakaya and Atatiirk dams. The population in this area is in jeopardy because of decreased temperatures of the dam impoundment waters (min. 7oC, max. 12oC during the summer months) and a lack of suitable sandy banks for nesting. Information on status of the species in the Tigris basin in Turkey is scarce. The three completed dams on the Euphrates (Keban, Karakaya, and Atattirk), and two others under construction (Birecik and Karkamis) seriously threaten the survival of the species in southeastern Anatolia. Former basking and nesting areas are now submerged, and daily water level fluctuations complicate the establish- ment of new nesting sites. We surveyed the distribution of R. euphraticus prior to and after the construction of Atatiirk Dam. The number of suitable habitats and apparent population levels have declined and we believe the species is endangered in Turkey.
  • HIRBEMERDON TEPE DURING the IRON AGE PERIOD: a Case Study in the Upper Tigris River Region*

    HIRBEMERDON TEPE DURING the IRON AGE PERIOD: a Case Study in the Upper Tigris River Region*

    Anatolica 36, 17-65. doi: 10.2143/ANA.36.0.2049238 © 2010 by Anatolica. All rights reserved. ANATOLICA XXXVI, 2010 HIRBEMERDON TEPE DURING THE IRON AGE PERIOD: * A case study in the Upper Tigris river region Guido Guarducci & Nicola Laneri** The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the material culture uncovered from the Iron Age levels (ca. 1050-610 BC) at the site of Hirbemerdon Tepe, located along the upper Tigris river in southeastern Turkey. The first part of the paper includes a brief introductory chapter dedicated to the site location and its geographical and environmental context, with a second chapter on the Neo-Assyrian historical sources on the area here considered. The second half of the paper instead comprises a detailed analysis of the architecture and pottery found in Hirbemerdon Tepe’s Iron Age levels with a specific focus on the most represented and best preserved phase, the Early Iron Age period (i.e., Phase IVA, ca. 1050-900 BC). Moreover, a catalogue describing the studied pottery fragments is attached at the end of the article as an Appendix. The final section of the paper places the ceramic assemblage in a broader historical context to better define the role played by the site of Hirbemerdon Tepe during the Iron Age, with a specific emphasis on the transformation that occurred in the socioeconomic landscape of the upper Tigris river due to the arrival of the Neo-Assyrians in the area during the ninth century BC. 1. THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT The archaeological site of Hirbemerdon Tepe is situated in southeastern Turkey in the DiyarbakÕr province, 40 km east of the modern town of Bismil (Fig.
  • Management of Manure from Livestock Housing in Tigris

    Management of Manure from Livestock Housing in Tigris

    ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Jelgava, 25.-27.05.2016. MANAGEMENT OF MANURE FROM LIVESTOCK HOUSING IN TIGRIS BASIN AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL POTENTIAL IMPACT Atilgan Atilgan 1, Burak Saltuk 2, Hasan Oz 1, Ozan Artun 3 1Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey; 2Siirt University, Turkey; 3Cukurova University; Turkey [email protected] Abstract. The study was carried out in the Tigris basin and covered four cities (Diyarbakır, Mardin, Batman, Siirt and Sirnak). The potential pollution impacts of the cattle breeding enterprises in the research area on the Batman, Botan, Garzan and Tigris Rivers were examined. In this context, the borders of the research provinces and current water resources were drawn with ARCMAP 10.0 software by making geographical adjustments. In order to enable each province’s questioning to be done independently from other provinces and water resources, all borders were divided into separate layers on the basis of provinces, districts, and villages. Furthermore, in accordance with the purpose of this study in the database the number of cattle at the cattle breeding enterprises close to water resources (minimum 150 meters-maximum 5 kilometers) was entered into the Geographical Information System (CIS) database and interpreted taking into account the average waste to be created by the cattle. In this study, the potential risk areas to be created for the environment and water resources were tried to be determined when the manure generated in the cattle breeding enterprises operating in the research area is not stored and utilized appropriately. It was found that the water resources, particularly in the villages of Batman and Diyarbakır provinces, faced a higher risk of contamination.
  • Kurmanji Kurdish— a Reference Grammar with Selected Readings

    Kurmanji Kurdish— a Reference Grammar with Selected Readings

    —Kurmanji Kurdish— A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings W. M. Thackston ii CONTENTS PHONOLOGY Alphabet and sounds ......................................................................................1 The aspirated and unaspirated stops...............................................................3 Stress ..............................................................................................................4 Orthographic variants.....................................................................................4 Doubled consonants .......................................................................................4 The furtive i....................................................................................................4 SUBSTANTIVES § 1. The Noun.................................................................................................7 § 1.1. Gender..................................................................................................7 § 1.2. Inflection ..............................................................................................7 § 2. Demonstrative Adjectives and Her ‘Every’............................................9 § 3. The Indefinite State ...............................................................................10 § 4. The Primary Construct Case .................................................................11 § 4.1 The Adjectival Construct ....................................................................12 § 5. The Secondary Construct: The Construct Extender..............................14
  • (GAP) of Turkey

    (GAP) of Turkey

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kankal, Murat; Nacar, Sinan; Uzlu, Ergun Article Status of hydropower and water resources in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey Energy Reports Provided in Cooperation with: Elsevier Suggested Citation: Kankal, Murat; Nacar, Sinan; Uzlu, Ergun (2016) : Status of hydropower and water resources in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey, Energy Reports, ISSN 2352-4847, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, pp. 123-128, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.05.003 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/187851 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Download This PDF File

    Download This PDF File

    Cellular and Molecular Biology E-ISSN : 1165-158X / P-ISSN : 0145-5680 www.cellmolbiol.org Original Research Effect of physicochemical parameters on zooplankton at a freshwater body of Euphrates Basin (Elazıg-Turkey) Hilal Bulut, Serap Saler* Fisheries Faculty, Fırat University, Elazıg, Turkey Correspondence to: [email protected] Received November 16, 2018; Accepted December 13, 2018; Published January 31, 2019 Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2019.65.1.2 Copyright: © 2019 by the C.M.B. Association. All rights reserved. Abstract: In this study zooplankton was determined between June 2015-May 2016 in Keban Reservoir. Also some chemical and physical parameters as water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity and Chlorophyll a were measured in situ, monthly. Total of 40 zooplankton species; 27 Rotifera, 11 Cladocera, 2 Copepoda species were identified in this study. The data of this study were evaluated number of individuals, species richness and species diversity. Maximum, minimum, SD and mean values of water quality parameters were calculated. As a result of Shannon Wiener index analysis of current study, species diversity was found highest in January (H'=2.03) and the least index value was found in May (H'=0.46). Margalef index value recorded in its highest value in January (D=1.07) in the 2nd station and the lowest value in February (D=0.11) in the 1st station. Key words: Water quality parameters; Zooplankton; Species diversity; Species richness; Euphrates Basin. Introduction physicochemical properties, and biotic factors (7-11). Environmental factors are also important elements; for Changes in abiotic factors are reflected in the bio- instance, water temperature impacts the growth and chemical activity of both vertebrates and invertebrates.