DOCSLIB.ORG

SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE for MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE for MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE for MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 2015 EPAS Curricular Guide Resource Series SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE for MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE for MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 2015 EPAS Curricular Guide Resource Series Council on Social Work Education Alexandria, Virginia Copyright © 2018, Council on Social Work Education Published in the United States by the Council on Social Work Education, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any manner whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN 978-0-87293-188-6 Council on Social Work Education 1701 Duke Street, Suite 200 Alexandria, VA 22314-3457 www.cswe.org Acknowledgments This document was developed through a collaborative partnership with the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) and the Special Commission to Advance Macro Practice (SC) and with the generous support of the Fund for Social Policy Education and Practice (FSPEP). Additional support was provided by the following partner organizations: the Association for Community Organization and Social Administration (ACOSA), Influencing Social Policy (ISP), and the Network for Social Work Management (NSWM). COORDINATING FOCUS AREA TEAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS LEADERS Darlyne Bailey Bruce D. Friedman Bryn Mawr College (Administration/Management) California State University, Bakersfield Terry Mizrahi Capella University Hunter College, CUNY Sunny Harris Rome (Policy) Jo Ann Regan George Mason University Council on Social Work Education Tracy Soska (Community) Adrienne Walters University of Pittsburgh Council on Social Work Education v vi SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE FOR MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE TEAM LEADERSHIP CONSULTANTS Mimi Abramovitz (Policy) Kimberly Richards Hunter College, CUNY The People's Institute for Survival and Beyond Michálle E. Mor Barack (Administration/Management) Joyce James University of Southern California Joyce James Consulting LLC Shane Brady (Community) University of Oklahoma THE NATIONAL TASK Amy Cohen-Callow FORCE BY FOCUS AREAS (Administration/Management) University of Maryland ADMINISTRATION/MANAGEMENT FOCUS AREA TEAM MEMBERS Linda Plitt Donaldson (Policy) Catholic University of America Cyndi Amato University of New England Karen Hopkins (Administration/Management) Randy J Baxter University of Maryland Spring Arbor University Nancy A. Morrow (Field Education) Maria Beam Bryn Mawr College Oakland University Mary Ohmer (Community) Diane R Bessel University of Pittsburgh Daemen College Suzanne Pritzker (Policy) Lois A. Bosch University of Houston University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Amy Tauati (Field Education) Larry Breitenstein Azusa Pacific University Slippery Rock University Jennifer Zelnick (Community) James R Carter Touro College Wright State University Lisa Clifton Asbury University PROJECT MANAGER Valerie Cuffee KB Bonner George Mason University Bryn Mawr College Thomas P. Felke Florida Gulf Coast University PRODUCTION MANAGER Jodi Jacobson Frey Julian Goldhagen University of Maryland Baltimore Hunter College, CUNY Lauri Goldkind Fordham University Acknowledgments vii Baorong Guo Jennifer R. Jewell University of Missouri-St. Louis Salisbury University Lisa Hawash Theresa Kreif Portland State University University of Hawai'i at Manoa Andrea L. Jones Diane Loeffler University of North Carolina Wilmington University of Kentucky Benjamin Lough Eva Moya University of Illinois at University of Texas at El Paso Urbana-Champaign Amy Murphy-Nugen Maureen MacNamara Western Carolina University Appalachian State University René D. Olate Nancy Morrow The Ohio State University Bryn Mawr College Emmerentie Oliphant Jose A Ramos Jr. Stephen F. Austin State University California State University Northridge Stephen W. Stoeffler Barry Rosenberg Kutztown University of Pennsylvania Washington University in St. Louis Tonya VanDeinse Amy Tauati University of North Carolina at Azusa Pacific University Chapel Hill Jimmy Young Sherron Wilkes California State University San Marcos Miles College Gautam N. Yadama COMMUNITY FOCUS AREA Boston College TEAM MEMBERS Brooke Blaalid POLICY FOCUS AREA TEAM University of South Dakota MEMBERS Mary E. Daly Eli Bartle Mansfield University California State University Northridge Chris Fike Carly Burton Saginaw Valley State University Simmons University Colleen Fisher Pamela Chiang University of Minnesota Eastern Connecticut State University Scott Harding Michel A. Coconis University of Connecticut Union Institute & University Tamara K. Hicks Sheila Crowley Johnson C. Smith University Virginia Commonwealth University Cheryl A. Hyde Fredi Giesler Temple University University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh viii SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE FOR MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE Jing Guo ADDITIONAL University of Hawaii at Manoa CONTRIBUTORS Peter A. Kindle Jennifer Hughes University of South Dakota Wright State University Melinda Lewis Gisele Ferretto University of Kansas University of Maryland, Baltimore Isabel Logan Angela Jachelski Eastern Connecticut State University University of Maryland, Baltimore Diane R. Martell Maria Rodriguez Rhode Island College Hunter College Heather A. McCabe Indiana University FUND FOR SOCIAL POLICY Cathy McElderry EDUCATION AND PRACTICE Southeast Missouri State University Patricia A. White Donna McIntosh Executive Director Siena College Molly W. Metzger COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK Washington University in St. Louis EDUCATION Jill E. Murray Darla Spence Coffey Southern University at New Orleans President and CEO Mary Nienow Jo Ann Coe Regan University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Vice President of Education Jason Ostrander Andrea Bediako Sacred Heart University Associate Director, Education Initiatives Carolyn G. Peabody and Research Stony Brook University Adrienne Walters Linda S. Schmidt Program Associate, Education Initiatives Western Michigan University and Research Stephen Monroe Tomczak Elizabeth Simon Southern Connecticut State University Publications Manager LaTamera Woodley Mary Kurfess Tennessee Department of Human Consultant Services Contents Acknowledgments . v Preface: Competency-Based Education . xv Introduction . xix Introduction to the Competencies: Underlying Assumptions Common to Macro-Level Practice . xxvii Competency 1 Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior . 1 Appendix 1A: Case Vignette: College Counseling Center . 10 Appendix 1B: Small Group Discussion: Administrative Dilemma . 12 Appendix 1C: Supervision in the Organizational Context . 15 Appendix 1D: Community Practice Ethics Case Studies . 16 Appendix 1E: Identifying Your Leadership and Supervisory Style . 19 Appendix 1F: Case Study: Organizational Culture . 19 Appendix 1G: Reflecting on Advocacy . 21 Appendix 1H: Advocate’s Autobiography . 22 Appendix 1I: Values Inventory for Policy Practice . 22 Appendix 1J: Exploring Ethical Dilemmas From Field Internship . 25 ix x SPECIALIZED PRACTICE CURRICULAR GUIDE FOR MACRO SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE Competency 2 Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice . 27 Appendix 2A: Cultural Self-Identification . 39 Appendix 2B: Power Exercise . 43 Appendix 2C: Privilege and Policy . 46 Appendix 2D: Case Study: Spotlight on Youth Organizing . 49 Appendix 2E: Engaging Diversity in Management and Administration: Comprehensive Paper Assignment . 52 Appendix 2F: Preparing to Engage With a New Organization . 53 Appendix 2G: Social Work Pioneers of Color Biographical Sketch . 54 Competency 3 Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice . 57 Appendix 3A: Human Rights as a Frame for Policy Practice . 67 Appendix 3B: Theories of Justice: Class Debate . 68 Appendix 3C: Human Rights Policy Critique . 69 Competency 4 Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice . 71 Appendix 4A: Community Practice Methods Activity . 78 Appendix 4B: Turn the Curve for Result-based Accountability . 79 Appendix 4C: Community-based Participatory Action Research: Neighborhood Assessment and Analysis Paper and Presentation . 79 Appendix 4D: Community-based Participatory Action Research: Research Proposal and Study . 81 Appendix 4E: Community-based Participatory Action Research: Research Paper Instructions . 84 Appendix 4F: Grand Challenges Assignment . 86 Contents xi Competency 5 Engage in Policy Practice . 89 Appendix 5A: Case Vignette: Organizational Development . 99 Appendix 5B: Case Vignette: ABC Agency . 100 Appendix 5C: Think Tank Activity . 102 Appendix 5D: “The Light of Day” Strikes Again: Legislator Profile . 103 Appendix 5E: Comparing Policy Analysis Frameworks . 104 Appendix 5F: Policy Development Exercise . 105 Appendix 5G: Advocacy Policy Role Play . 105 Appendix 5H: Historical Policy Analysis . 108 Appendix 5I: Develop Volunteer Manual . 109 Appendix 5J: Rural Advocacy Project . 109 Appendix 5K: Who Represents Me in Government? . 111 Appendix 5L: Hearing Analysis . 113 Appendix 5M: Supreme Court Contributions to Social Policy: Case Analysis . 114 Appendix 5N: Legislative Proposal Assessment . 116 Competency 6 Engagement With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities . 119 Appendix 6A: Rebuttal of How to Conduct Yourself as a Practitioner Abroad . 129 Appendix 6B: Advocacy Communications Critique . 130 Appendix 6C: Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders . 131 Appendix 6D: Profiles of Elected Officials . 132 Appendix 6E: Survey of Advocacy Organizations . 133 Appendix 6F: Twitter Assignment . 134 Appendix 6G: Interorganizational Engagement in Collaborations, Coalitions, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Social Welfare Strategies
    Throughout the world, societies are reexamining, reforming, and restructuring their social welfare systems. New ways are being sought to manage and finance these systems, and new approaches are being developed that alter the relative roles of government, private business, and individ- uals. Not surprisingly, this activity has triggered spirited debate about the relative merits of the various ways of structuring social welfare systems in general and social security programs in particular. The current changes respond to a vari- ety of forces. First, many societies are ad- justing their institutions to reflect changes in social philosophies about the relative responsibilities of government and the individual. These philosophical changes are especially dramatic in China, the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union; but The Advantages and Disadvantages they are also occurring in what has tradi- of Different Social Welfare Strategies tionally been thought of as the capitalist West. Second, some societies are strug- by Lawrence H. Thompson* gling to adjust to the rising costs associated with aging populations, a problem particu- The following was delivered by the author to the High Level American larly acute in the OECD countries of Asia, Meeting of Experts on The Challenges of Social Reform and New Adminis- Europe, and North America. Third, some trative and Financial Management Techniques. The meeting, which took countries are adjusting their social institu- tions to reflect new development strate- place September 5-7, 1994, in Mar de1 Plata, Argentina, was sponsored gies, a change particularly important in by the International Social Security Association at the invitation of the those countries in the Americas that seek Argentine Secretariat for Social Security in collaboration with the ISSA economic growth through greater eco- Member Organizations of that country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public, the Private and the Corporation Paul N
    Marquette Law Review Volume 80 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter 1997 The Public, the Private and the Corporation Paul N. Cox Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Paul N. Cox, The Public, the Private and the Corporation, 80 Marq. L. Rev. 391 (1997). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol80/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PUBLIC, THE PRIVATE AND THE CORPORATION PAUL N. Cox TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ........................................... 393 I. Introduction to the Contractual and Communitarian Mod- els .......................................... 401 II. The Contractarian Perspective ..................... 411 A. The Contractual Theory of the Firm .............. 411 B. Individualist Contract and Neoclassical Contract .... 421 1. The Kantian Variation ...................... 422 2. The Humean Variation ..................... 425 3. The Hobbesian Variation .................... 431 4. Some General Distinctions .................. 434 5. Facilitation and Formalism .................. 450 III. The Communitarian Perspective .................... 470 A. Social Construction .......................... 474 B. Community and Morality ...................... 492 1. Communitarian Autonomy
    [Show full text]
  • Lola V Skadden and the Automation of the Legal Profession
    Simon et al.: Lola v Skadden and the Automation of the Legal Profession Lola v. Skadden and the Automation of the Legal Profession Michael Simon, Alvin F. Lindsay, Loly Sosa & Paige Comparato1 20 Yale J.L. & Tech. 234 (2018) Technological innovation has accelerated at an exponential pace in the last few decades, ushering in an era of unprecedented advancements in algorithms andartificial intelligence technologies. Traditionally,the legalfield has protected itselffrom technological disruptionsby maintaininga professionalmonopoly over legal work and limiting the "practiceof law" to only those who are licensed. This article analyzes the long-term impact of the Second Circuit's opinion in Lola v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, 620 F. App 'x 37 (2d Cir. 2015), on the legal field's existing monopoly over the "practiceof law." In Lola, the Second Circuit underscored that "tasks that could otherwise be performed entirely by a machine" could not be said to fall under the "practiceof law." By distinguishing between mechanistic tasks and legal tasks, the Second Circuit repudiated the legal field's oft-cited appeals to tradition insisting that tasks fall under the "practice of law" because they have always fallen under the practice of law. The broader implications of this decision are threefold. (1) as machines evolve, they will encroach on and limit the tasks considered to be the "practice of law ", (2) mechanistic tasks removedfrom the "practiceof law" may no longer be regulatedby professionalrules governing the legalfield; and (3) to survive the rise of technology in the legalfield, lawyers will need to adapt to a new "practice of law" in which they will act as innovators, purveyors of judgment and wisdom, and guardians of fairness, impartiality,and accountabilitywithin the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning Law Is
    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND LEGAL REASONING LAW IS "MAN MADE" IT CHANGES OVER TIME TO ACCOMMODATE SOCIETY'S NEEDS LAW IS MADE BY LEGISLATURE LAW IS INTERPRETED BY COURTS TO DETERMINE 1)WHETHER IT IS "CONSTITUTIONAL" 2)WHO IS RIGHT OR WRONG THERE IS A PROCESS WHICH MUST BE FOLLOWED (CALLED "PROCEDURAL LAW") I. Thomas Jefferson: "The study of the law qualifies a man to be useful to himself, to his neighbors, and to the public." II. Ask Several Students to give their definition of "Law." A. Even after years and thousands of dollars, "LAW" still is not easy to define B. What does law Consist of ? Law consists of enforceable rule governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society. 1. Students Need to Understand. a. The law is a set of general ideas b. When these general ideas are applied, a judge cannot fit a case to suit a rule; he must fit (or find) a rule to suit the unique case at hand. c. The judge must also supply legitimate reasons for his decisions. C. So, How was the Law Created. The law considered in this text are "man made" law. This law can (and will) change over time in response to the changes and needs of society. D. Example. Grandma, who is 87 years old, walks into a pawn shop. She wants to sell her ring that has been in the family for 200 years. Grandma asks the dealer, "how much will you give me for this ring." The dealer, in good faith, tells Grandma he doesn't know what kind of metal is in the ring, but he will give her $150.
    [Show full text]
  • Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why It Is, and Why It Matters Jay M
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 58 | Issue 1 Article 2 1-2006 Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why It Is, and Why It Matters Jay M. Feinman Stephen R. Brill Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jay M. Feinman and Stephen R. Brill, Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why It Is, and Why It Matters, 58 Hastings L.J. 61 (2006). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why It Is, and Why It Matters JAY M. FEINMAN* AND STEPHEN R. BRILL** INTRODUCTION Courts and scholars uniformly recite the contract law rule familiar to all first-year students: An advertisement is not an offer. The courts and scholars are wrong. An advertisement is an offer. This Article explains why the purported rule is not the law, why the actual rule is that an advertisement is an offer, why that rule is correct, and what it tells us about contract law in particular and legal doctrine in general. I. THE TRADITIONAL RULE: AN ADVERTISEMENT Is NOT AN OFFER It is Hornbook law' that an advertisement is not an offer. Williston self-assuredly declared the rule to be an application of the dividing line between preliminary negotiations and offers: Frequently, negotiations for a contract are begun between parties by general expressions of willingness to enter into a bargain upon stated terms and yet the natural construction of the words and conduct of the parties is rather that they are inviting offers, or suggesting the terms of a possible future bargain than making positive offers.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Community Practice
    Journal of Community Practice ISSN: 1070-5422 (Print) 1543-3706 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wcom20 Managing Out Michael J. Austin PhD To cite this article: Michael J. Austin PhD (2002) Managing Out, Journal of Community Practice, 10:4, 33-48, DOI: 10.1300/J125v10n04_03 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v10n04_03 Published online: 22 Sep 2008. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 163 View related articles Citing articles: 7 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wcom20 Download by: [University of California, Berkeley] Date: 25 April 2016, At: 12:10 Managing Out: The Community Practice Dimensions of Effective Agency Management Michael J. Austin, PhD ABSTRACT. With the advent of welfare reform and managed care, the nature of managerial practice has increasingly shifted from a primary fo- cus on internal operations to a more external, community focus which in- volves actively monitoring and managing the boundary between the external environment and internal organizational arrangements. This ar- ticle explores the boundary spanning aspects of community practice, the related theories of inter-organizational relations, and the process of “managing out” by those in top management and middle management posi- tions in human service organizations. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: <[email protected]>
    [Show full text]
  • Law, As for Election of the State Great Hural
    UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION LAW ON ELECTION PART ONE CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Purpose of the Law Article 2. Legislation on election Article 3. Legal terms and definitions Article 4. Basic principles of election Article 5. Principles for election activity organization Article 6. Elections Article 7. Election system Article 8. Types of election Article 9. Election stages Article 10. Election time frame CHAPTER TWO: ELECTIVE RIGHTS Article 11. Right of a citizen of Mongolia to elect and be elected Article 12. Right to nominate candidate for the election of the State Great Hural and its Members Article 13. Right to nominate a candidate for Presidential election Article 14. The right to nominate a candidate for the election of the Citizens’ Representatives’ Hural Article 15. Prohibiting simultaneous candidacy CHAPTER THREE: BASIS FOR ELECTION ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION Article 16. Regular election, setting and announcement of the polling day Article 17. Setting and announcement of non-regular election Article 18. Setting and announcement of by-election Article 19. Setting and announcement of re-election Article 20. Polling day of elections other than regular election CHAPTER FOUR: STRUCTURE OF ELECTION TERRITORY Article 21. Election territory Article 22. Election constituency Article 23. Election precinct CHAPTER FIVE: ELECTION AUTHORITY Subchapter one: General provisions Article 24. Election authority Article 25. Administration and structure of an election authority Article 26. Administration and organization of a polling authority for citizens residing in a foreign country Article 27. Operation procedures of election authorities Article 28. Staff and officials of an election authority Article 29. Economic and legal guarantee for election officials Subchapter two: The central election authority Article 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Casework in a Congressional Office: Background, Rules, Laws, and Resources
    Casework in a Congressional Office: Background, Rules, Laws, and Resources Updated April 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33209 Casework in a Congressional Office: Background, Rules, Laws, and Resources Summary In a congressional office, the term casework refers to the response or services that Members of Congress provide to constituents who request assistance. Each year, thousands of constituents turn to Members of Congress with a wide range of requests, from the simple to the complex. Members and their staffs help constituents deal with administrative agencies by acting as facilitators, ombudsmen, and, in some cases, advocates. In addition to serving individual constituents, some congressional offices also consider as casework liaison activities between the federal government and local governments, businesses, communities, and nonprofit organizations. Members of Congress determine the scope of their constituent service activities. Casework is conducted for various reasons, including a broadly held understanding among Members and staff that casework is integral to the representational duties of a Member of Congress. Casework activities may also be viewed as part of an outreach strategy to build political support, or as an evaluative stage of the legislative process. Constituent inquiries about specific policies, programs, or benefits may suggest areas where government programs or policies require institutional oversight or legislative consideration. One challenge to congressional casework is the widely held public perception that Members of Congress can initiate a broad array of actions resulting in a speedy, favorable outcome. The rules of the House and Senate, and laws and regulations governing federal executive agency activities, however, closely limit interventions made on the behalf of constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Municipal Councillors
    Councillor Induction Programme Handbook for Municipal Councillors SALGA and GTZ South Africa, March 2006 Acknowledgements This Handbook for Municipal Councillors is part of SALGA’s larger Skills Development and Capacity Building Initiative. The authors acknowledge the valuable feedback and comments provided by SALGA’s national and provincial offices, Department of Provincial and Local Government, the Presidency, National Treasury, Department of Housing, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, the Good Governance Learning Network (GGLN), GTZ, CSIR, University of Pretoria and a number of service providers. Special appreciation is expressed to EISA and Planact for the preparation of the Handbook. Both organisations have provided invaluable knowledge and expertise in the field of local governance and municipal development. We also thank GTZ’s Strengthening Local Governance Programme for making this project possible. The material has been compiled by EISA and Planact Design & layout by ITL Communication & Design Printed by Global Print Councillor Induction Programme Handbook for Municipal Councillors Executive Mayor Councillor Amos Masondo Chairperson of SALGA Foreword The South African Local Government Association (SALGA) is indeed proud to produce this edition of the Councillor Handbook with the support of the Department of Provincial and Local Government, Masibambane and the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ). Many municipalities across the country will witness the ushering in of a new cadre of councillors whose main responsibility will be to play a crucial role in accelerating service delivery to their respective communities. Moreover, councillors will be increasingly called upon to lend positive impetus to the process of public participation in the affairs of their municipalities, be the political custodians of good governance and accountability, and to vigorously advocate for the needs of their constituents – hence the publication of this Handbook to aid you with the challenging tasks that await you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1999 The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete Ronald J. Gilson Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Ronald J. Gilson, The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete, 74 N.Y.U. L. REV. 575 (1999). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/992 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 74 JUNE 1999 NUMBER 3 THE LEGAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: SILICON VALLEY, ROUTE 128, AND COVENANTS NOT TO COMPETE RONALD J. GII.SON* In recentyears, scholars and policymakers have rediscoveredthe concept of indus- trialdistricts-spatial concentrations offirms in the same industry or related indus- tries. In this Article, Professor Gilson examines te relationship between high- technology industrial districts and legal infrastructure by comparing the legal re- gimes of California's Silicon Valley and Massachusetts'sRoute 128. He contends that legal rides governing evmployee mobility influence the dynamics of high ted- nology industrialdistricts by either encouragingrapid employee movement between employers and to startups, as in Silicon Valley, or discouragingsuch movement, as in Route 128.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Community-Centred Approaches for Health and Wellbeing
    A guide to community-centred approaches for health and wellbeing Full report Community-centred approaches for health and wellbeing About Public Health England Public Health England exists to protect and improve the nation's health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities. It does this through world-class science, knowledge and intelligence, advocacy, partnerships and the delivery of specialist public health services. PHE is an operationally autonomous executive agency of the Department of Health. Public Health England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG Tel: 020 7654 8000 www.gov.uk/phe Twitter: @PHE_uk Facebook: www.facebook.com/PublicHealthEngland Prepared by: Professor Jane South Supported by: Jude Stansfield, Pritti Mehta and advisory group: Anne Brice, Ann Marie Connolly, Catherine Davies, Gregor Henderson, Paul Johnstone (PHE), Olivia Butterworth, Luke O’Shea, Giles Wilmore (NHS England). Also Dave Buck, James Thomas, Ginny Brunton. Anne-Marie Bagnall and Kris Southby, Leeds Beckett University, undertook a scoping review for this publication. © Crown copyright 2015 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit OGL or email [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to [email protected]. Published February 2015 PHE publications gateway number: 2014711 2 Community-centred approaches for health and wellbeing Contents About Public Health England 2 Foreword 4 Executive summary 5 Introduction 7 Why work with communities? 8 Communities as building blocks for health 11 A family of community-centred approaches 15 Health outcomes and evidence 31 Conclusion 36 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Organizing: Practice, Research, and Policy Implications ∗ Brian D
    Social Issues and Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, pp. 193--222 Community Organizing: Practice, Research, and Policy Implications ∗ Brian D. Christens University of Wisconsin–Madison Paul W. Speer Vanderbilt University Community organizing—a field of practice in which residents collaboratively in- vestigate and undertake sustained collective action regarding social issues of mutual concern—has often proven an effective method for achieving changes in policies and systems at local, regional, and even national scales. The field is dynamic. It has expanded and has undergone numerous changes over re- cent decades. Research from a variety of disciplines has documented, evalu- ated, and informed many of these changes. This article scrutinizes the evolv- ing field of community organizing, with a particular focus on the current state of social and psychological research on broad-based community orga- nizing processes and outcomes. These findings include not only the effects of community organizing efforts on policies and systems, but also the influences of community organizing on psychological changes among the people and groups who participate. These findings are incorporated into recommendations for poli- cies, practices, and future research. Introduction Community organizing is an umbrella term for a field of practice in which residents collaboratively investigate and take collective action regarding social issues of mutual concern. Most often, the intent of organizing is to change policies regarding local issues, which have included, for instance: improvements in public safety (Speer et al., 2003), housing (Speer & Christens, 2012), employment con- ditions (Osterman, 2006), transportation (Speer, Tesdahl, & Ayers, 2014), public ∗ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Brian D.
    [Show full text]