The Silesian Uprisings and Plebiscite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

14 października 2020 The Silesian Uprisings and Plebiscite After World War I, Silesia remained outside the borders of the Republic of Poland. As per the decision issued during the peace conference, a plebiscite was to be held, the result of which was supposed to determine whether Upper Silesia would belong to Poland or Germany. The arrests of Polish activists and the massacre in Mysłowice, where German soldiers opened fire on the crowd, became the direct cause of the first uprising. The battles began on 17 August, but the rebels did not have enough weapons and ammunition to achieve any kind of success. After just a week, the commander of the Polish Military Organization, Alfons Zgrzebniok (the inhabitant of Dziergowice), issued the order to end the uprising. On 11 February 1920, the Inter-Allied Ruling and Plebiscite Commission of Upper Silesia began to function in Opole. British, French, and Italian military units in the number of 26,000 soldiers were sent there to be at the Commission’s disposal. While the Allies did force the Germans to retreat their regular military units from Silesia, 30 thousand of German police officers remained there, who did everything to make the Poles’ lives miserable and to cause pre-plebiscite agitation. This resulted in many tensions, which, in turn, caused the outbreak of another uprising in August 1920. This time, success was achieved – the Allies dissolved the German police and formed new police, which was half-German and half-Polish. The plebiscite that took place on 20 March 1921 did not give a unanimous result. 500 thousand of voters favored Poland, whereas 700 thousand voters chose Germany. The division of Silesia suggested by the Allies was unacceptable to the Polish party, and therefore, on 3 May 1921, the Third Silesian Uprising broke out. Wojciech Korfanty became the commandant of the uprising. In a short time, the rebels seized the terrains on the right bank of the Odra River, from Opawa to Gogolin (including the harbor in Koźle, as well as Kędzierzyn, and Kłodnica) and the areas situated northeast from Ozimek, Dobrodzień, and Olesno. Soon, the Germans brought over 40 thousand selected soldiers to Silesia and began the counterattack. The most severe battles were fought in the region of Kędzierzyn, the harbor in Koźle, Dobrodzień, and, most notably, around St. Anne’s Mountain. In the second half of May, the Germans took the initiative by reclaiming St. Anne’s Mountain and Kędzierzyn and its adjacent areas from the hands of the rebels. At the insistence of the Allies and the Polish government, the uprising was brought to an end, and the Conference of Ambassadors in Paris decided to divide Silesia in a way that would be more beneficial for Poland. Due to the Allies’ decision, the regions of Opole, and therefore, the Koźle Region as well, were given to the Germans..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

WOJCIECH KORFANTY Grzegorz Bębnik Sebastian Rosenbaum Mirosław Węcki
WOJCIECH KORFANTY Grzegorz Bębnik Sebastian Rosenbaum Mirosław Węcki BOHATEROWIE NIEPODLEGŁEJ Wojciech Korfanty. (Zbiory Narodowego Archiwum Cyfrowego) BOHATEROWIE NIEPODLEGŁEJ WOJCIECH KORFANTY 1873–1939 Polityk legenda Wojciech Korfanty jest najbardziej znanym polskim politykiem z Gór- nego Śląska działającym w pierwszej połowie XX w. Był pierwszym politykiem jednoznacznie głoszącym jedność Górnego Śląska z resztą ziem polskich, który został posłem do niemieckiego parlamentu. Kor- fanty odegrał istotną rolę w procesie odbudowy Rzeczypospolitej po 1918 r. W Wielkopolsce należał do Naczelnej Rady Ludowej stanowiącej polityczne centrum tej dzielnicy. Przede wszystkim jednak trzeba go wiązać z aktywnością na rodzimym Górnym Śląsku. Z ramienia rządu polskiego kierował Polskim Komisariatem Plebiscytowym na Górnym Śląsku w latach 1919–1921, koordynując niełatwą walkę o pozyskanie dla Polski głosów Górnoślązaków. W maju 1921 r. stanął na czele III powstania śląskiego jako jego dyktator. Przyczynił się tym walnie do włączenia uprzemysłowionej części regionu górnośląskiego do Rze- czypospolitej. W początkach II Rzeczypospolitej Korfanty był wiodącym polity- kiem w województwie śląskim, a pewną pozycję zdobył także na ogólno- krajowej scenie politycznej. Po zamachu majowym 1926 r. odsunięty od sprawowania władzy, stał się jednym z liderów opozycji antysanacyjnej. Jednocześnie tworzył podwaliny pod polską chadecję i myśl katolicko- 3 -społeczną. Za pośrednictwem wpływowego dziennika „Polonia”, któ- rego był wydawcą, oddziaływał na nastroje opinii publicznej nie tylko w województwie śląskim, lecz także w skali ogólnokrajowej. Ostatnie lata jego życia to dramatyczny okres – musiał udać się na emigrację do Czechosłowacji, a po powrocie do kraju w kwietniu 1939 r. został aresztowany. Zmarł wkrótce po opuszczeniu więzienia. Pochodzenie i edukacja Korfanty pochodził z robotniczej rodziny z Siemianowic Śląskich na Górnym Śląsku.
[Show full text]
The Case of Upper Silesia After the Plebiscite in 1921
Celebrating the nation: the case of Upper Silesia after the plebiscite in 1921 Andrzej Michalczyk (Max Weber Center for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, Erfurt, Germany.) The territory discussed in this article was for centuries the object of conflicts and its borders often altered. Control of some parts of Upper Silesia changed several times during the twentieth century. However, the activity of the states concerned was not only confined to the shifting borders. The Polish and German governments both tried to assert the transformation of the nationality of the population and the standardisation of its identity on the basis of ethno-linguistic nationalism. The handling of controversial aspects of Polish history is still a problem which cannot be ignored. Subjects relating to state policy in the western parts of pre-war Poland have been explored, but most projects have been intended to justify and defend Polish national policy. On the other hand, post-war research by German scholars has neglected the conflict between the nationalities in Upper Silesia. It is only recently that new material has been published in England, Germany and Poland. This examined the problem of the acceptance of national orientations in the already existing state rather than the broader topic of the formation and establishment of nationalistic movements aimed (only) at the creation of a nation-state.1 While the new research has generated relevant results, they have however, concentrated only on the broader field of national policy, above all on the nationalisation of the economy, language, education and the policy of changing names. Against this backdrop, this paper points out the effects of the political nationalisation on the form and content of state celebrations in Upper Silesia in the following remarks.
[Show full text]
Katowicka Ligota. Historia Rozwoju Przestrzennego. Wstęp Do Badań Katowice-Ligota
NAUKA SCIENCE Anna Krukowiecka-Brzęczek* Katowicka Ligota. Historia rozwoju przestrzennego. Wstęp do badań Katowice-Ligota. History of spatial development. Introduction to research Słowa kluczowe: Katowice-Ligota, modernizm, Key words: Katowice-Ligota, modernism, Górny Śląsk, architektura przemysłowa, zabudowa Upper Silesia, industrial architecture, willowa villa housing WSTĘP. INTRODUCTION. WIADOMOŚCI OGÓLNE, ZASIĘG GENERAL INFORMATION, TERYTORIALNY LIGOTY TERRITORIAL REACHES OF LIGOTA Motto: Motto: Niejednokrotnie spotkać się można z błędnym mniemaniem, There is a common enough popular misconception that Silesia jakoby Śląsk nie posiadał zabytków architektonicznych godnych cannot boast any architectonic monuments worth preserving. zachowania. Jednak przeciwnie, zabytków tych jest wiele, ale te On the contrary, there are many such monuments, but those nienależycie konserwowane bezpowrotnie niszczeją. inadequately preserved are irretrievably destroyed. Tadeusz Michejda Tadeusz Michejda w: memoriał Związku Architektów na Śląsku in: a memorial of the Architect Association z 30 kwietnia 1927 roku in Silesia on April 30, 1927 Katowice – miasto ogrodów. Takim hasłem pro- Katowice – a city of gardens. Such a slogan pro- mującym obchody 150-lecia miasta władze zachęcają moting the 150th anniversary of the city is used by the do spojrzenia na przestrzeń stolicy Śląska w odmienny local authorities to encourage us to look at the space of sposób. W sposób pozbawiony stereotypów i piętna the Silesian capital in a different way, a way devoid of przemysłowej brzydoty. Gdzie więc znajdziemy rzeczo- stereotypes or the stigma of industrial ugliness. Where ne ogrody? Za jeden z nich możemy uznać położoną na shall we ﬁ nd the mentioned gardens? One of them can południu Katowic dzielnicę Ligotę. be the district of Ligota located in the south of Katowice.
[Show full text]
Sifting Poles from Germans? Ethnic Cleansing and Ethnic Screening In
Sifting Poles from Germans? Ethnic Cleansing and Ethnic Screening in Upper Silesia, 1945–1949 Author(s): HUGO SERVICE Reviewed work(s): Source: The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 88, No. 4 (October 2010), pp. 652-680 Published by: the Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41061897 . Accessed: 25/08/2012 13:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Slavonic and East European Review. http://www.jstor.org SEER, Vol. 88, No. 4, October2010 SiftingPoles fromGermans? Ethnic Cleansingand EthnicScreening in Upper Silesia,1 945-1 949 HUGO SERVICE I The ethniccleansing which engulfedCentral and EasternEurope in the firsthalf of the twentiethcentury was oftena matterof indiscrimi- nate expulsionin whichlittle or no timewas takento reflecton the culturalidentity of the victims.Yet not all of it was carriedout in this manner.The occupiersand governmentswhich implementedethnic cleansingpolicies in Poland and Czechoslovakiaduring and afterthe Second World War came to the conclusionthat there were many inhabitantsof the territoriesthey wished to 'cleanse' who could not be instantlyrecognized as belongingto one nationalgroup or another.
[Show full text]
The Struggle for Upper Silesia, 1919-1922 Author(S): F
The Struggle for Upper Silesia, 1919-1922 Author(s): F. Gregory Campbell Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Sep., 1970), pp. 361-385 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1905870 . Accessed: 25/08/2012 14:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Modern History. http://www.jstor.org The Strugglefor Upper Silesia, 1919-1922 F. GregoryCampbell University of Chicago At the junction of Central Europe's three old empires lay one of the richestmineral and industrialareas of the continent.A territoryof some 4,000 square miles, Upper Silesia was ruled by Austria and Prussia throughoutmodern history. The northernsections and the area west of the Oder River were exclusivelyagricultural, and inhabitedlargely by Germans.In the extreme southeasterncorner of Upper Silesia, Polish peasants tilled the estates of German magnates. Lying between the Germanand the Polish agriculturalareas was a small triangulararea of mixed populationcontaining a wealth of mines and factories. That Upper Silesian "industrialtriangle" was second only to the Ruhr basin in ImperialGermany; in 1913 Upper Silesian coalfieldsaccounted for 21 percent of German coal production.
[Show full text]
Piłsudski Dmowski Paderewski Witos Korfanty Daszyński
OJCOWIE NIEPODLEGŁOŚCI PIŁSUDSKI DMOWSKI PADEREWSKI WITOS KORFANTY DASZYŃSKI FATHERS OF INDEPENDENCE Autorzy wystawy: dr Zofia Fenrych, Mateusz Lipko Współpraca: Grzegorz Czapski, Maciej Frycz, Paweł Miedziński, Magdalena Ruczyńska, dr Paweł Skubisz, prof. Włodzimierz Suleja Redakcja i tłumaczenie: Grażyna Waluga Projekt wystawy: Krzysztof Drumiński, Jakub Walkowicz (2code.pl) Odbudowa państwa Prezentujemy następujące postaci: polskiego po 123 latach Józef Piłsudski, Roman niewoli była wydarzeniem Dmowski, Ignacy Jan przełomowym. Wysiłek wielu Paderewski, Wincenty Witos, Polaków, trud i oﬁara Wojciech Korfanty poniesiona na frontach i Ignacy Daszyński. I wojny światowej oraz Jest wśród nich artysta, są dyplomaci, żołnierze i politycy, aktywne działania a także działacze społeczni. Reprezentowali różne poglądy polityczne, różnili się dyplomatyczne przynależnością społeczną i religią, urodzili się pod doprowadziły do narodzenia różnymi zaborami. Mimo to potrafili zjednoczyć się wokół jednego, się II Rzeczypospolitej. nadrzędnego celu: NIEPODLEGŁOŚCI. Nie oznaczało to, że we wszystkim byli zgodni i we wszystkim wzorowo Liderami tego procesu byli współdziałali. tytułowi Ojcowie Pozostali wierni własnym poglądom, ale wykorzystując sprzyjające warunki zewnętrzne, poprowadzili Polaków Niepodległości. ku WOLNOŚCI. Stanisław Bagieński, Rozbrajanie Niemców przed Główną Komendą na placu Saskim w Warszawie, 1939, olej na płótnie / Muzeum Wojska Polskiego w Warszawie Stanisław Bagieński, The disarming of Germans in front of the Headquarters at Saski
[Show full text]
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Gorecki, Joe Title: National Identity and Experiences of Nationalism in Germany’s ‘Lost Territories’ Danzig/Gdask and Kattowitz/Katowice, 1919-1930 General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. National Identity and Experiences of Nationalism in Germany’s ‘Lost Territories’:
[Show full text]
Fluid Identities in Central European Borderlands
02_EHQ 31/4 articles 15/10/01 12:54 pm Page 519 Peter Thaler Fluid Identities in Central European Borderlands The debate about the nature of national identity has been passionate and complex, and it has not led to convincing, gener- ally applicable models. In this article, the manner in which this identity expresses itself at its margins provides a new perspective on the broader theoretical issue. The sense-of-self of historical Central European border populations highlights the subjective component of group identities. In the countries of Central Europe, the conceptual dichotomy of Staatsnation and Kulturnation, introduced into the scholarly debate by Friedrich Meinecke, continues to dominate academic discourse — notwithstanding its theoretical expansion and criti- cal revision.1 The Staatsnation, which signifies the political or civic nation, is constructed around the citizenry of a politically organized territory, in other words, a state, regardless of the ethnic and cultural composition of this citizenry and of possible ethnocultural continuities beyond the existing political borders. It is sometimes defined as a constitutional nation when it de- marcates the nation by the reach of a liberal constitution; this reach will normally correspond to the political frontiers of a state. Its dependence on a specific constitutional content gives this conceptual variation a normative rather than an empirical character, since even internal revisions of the political structure would terminate the existing constitutional nation. The con- cept resembles the comparably ideology-based, if politically diametrically opposed, class nation, which periodically provided the theoretical foundation of the German Democratic Republic and was envisioned to create a structure of coherence for Soviet Man.
[Show full text]
Of Silesia Vol
Cuius regio? Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia vol. 5 eds Lucyna Harc, Przemysław Wiszewski, Rościsław Żerelik Online access: http://www.bibliotekacyfrowa.pl/publication/78119 Joanna Nowosielska-Sobel, Grzegorz Strauchold, Przemysław Wiszewski Permanent Change. The New Region(s) of Silesia (1945-2015) ed. Przemysław Wiszewski Wrocław 2015 The book was published with funds of the program Cuius regio. Analiza sił spajających i destrukcyjnych w obrębie regionu określających przynależność osób (grup społecznych) oraz spójność społeczną jako zjawisko historyczne / Cuius regio. An analysis of the cohesive and disruptive forces destining the attachment of (groups of) persons to and the cohesion within regions as a historical phenomenon, decision of the Polish Minister of Science and Higher Education No. 832/N-ESF-CORECODE/2010/0. Peer review: Małgorzata Ruchniewicz Translated by: Matthew La Fontaine, Paweł Ausir Dembowski, Anna Lidia Błaszczyk, Piotr Szutt Language proofreading: Matthew La Fontaine, Judson Hamilton © Copyright by Authors and Uniwersytet Wrocławski Cover design: Marcin Fajfruk Typesetting: Aleksandra Kumaszka, Tomasz Kalota ISBN 978-83-942651-2-0 Publishing House eBooki.com.pl ul. Obornicka 37/2 51-113 Wrocław tel.: +48 602 606 508 email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.ebooki.com.pl Table of Contents Przemysław Wiszewski A time of transformation. New Silesia under construction (1945-2015) ............ 9 Joanna Nowosielska-Sobel Administrative changes....................................................................................
[Show full text]
Online Conflict Discourse, Identity, and the Social Imagination of Silesian Minority in Poland by Krzysztof E
Online Conflict Discourse, Identity, and the Social Imagination of Silesian Minority in Poland By Krzysztof E. Borowski © 2020 Krzysztof E. Borowski M.A., University of Wrocław, 2011 B.A., University of Wrocław, 2009 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Slavic Languages and Literatures and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Co-Chair: Marc L. Greenberg Co-Chair: Renee Perelmutter Svetlana Vassileva-Karagyozova Arienne Dwyer Nathan Wood Date Defended: 29 April 2020 ii The dissertation committee for Krzysztof E. Borowski certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Online Conflict Discourse, Identity, and the Social Imagination of Silesian Minority in Poland Co-Chair: Marc L. Greenberg Co-Chair: Renee Perelmutter Date Approved: 29 April 2020 iii Abstract The second decade of the twenty-first century has been that of digital nationalism. In particular, the 2016 United States presidential elections and Brexit vote in the United Kingdom have shown that the increased use of social media has raised popular nationalism (Whitmeyer 2002) to a whole new level. While Europe and other parts of the world have visibly become more globalized, the Northern Atlantic region has witnessed a contradictory tendency for the rise and spread of nationalist sentiment. Much of this phenomenon has been taking place on the internet where conditions of apparent anonymity created a fertile ground for uninhibited identity expressions and performances. From the United States to Poland, people have retreated to their stable, national identities as a way of coping with the various facets of liquid modernity, in which the need for networking pushes individuals to engage in community building by bonding with other individuals through shared emotions (Bauman 2006, 37).
[Show full text]
OPOLE REGION and CENTRAL MORAVIA on the Trail of the Common Heritage of the Polish-Czech Borderland OPOLE REGION and CENTRAL MORAVIA
EN active recreation cultural heritage promotional natural events heritage OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL MORAVIA On the trail of the common heritage of the Polish-Czech borderland OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL MORAVIA On the trail of the common heritage of the Polish-Czech borderland cultural heritage natural cultural natural heritage heritage heritage active recreation active promotional recreation events The brochure has been created within the project Cultural and Natural Heritage for the Development of Polish-Czech Borderland „Common Heritage” which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund as part of the Programme INTERREG V-A Czech Republic – Poland and from the resources of the Self-Government of the Opolskie Voivodeship. promotional events Opolska Regionalna Organizacja Turystyczna ul. Żeromskiego 3 OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL Ordering Party 45-053 Opole tel. +48 77 44 12 521 MORAVIA http://orot.pl On the trail of the common heritage of the Magdalena Budkiewicz Text Dominika Borówka-Sitnik Polish-Czech borderland Jolanta Sieradzka-Kasprzak Piotr Mielec Hundreds of monuments, unique museums, and a rich cul- Content Alicja Mroczek supervision Adam Krzyżanowski tural life, accompanied by a picturesque landscape and Adam Kraska priceless nature, create an extraordinary combination Jarosław Małkowski / BANKFOTO Archive of the Opole Regional Tourist Organisation and its members which attracts thousands of tourists every year. Where can Archive of the project Partner Střední Morava – Sdružení cestovního ruchu Portal www.dabrowskieskarby.pl – s.11 you find all this? On the Polish-Czech borderland: in the re- Prudnicki Ośrodek Kultury – s. 17 Miejski Ośrodek Sportu i Rekreacji w Opolu – s. 18 gion of Opole and Central Moravia.
[Show full text]
PAC-Wisconsin Division Newsletter
museum and the historical importance of the uprisings can be found on their website From the Desk of the https://muzeumpowstanslaskich.pl/ or http://www.mpsl.pl/en/ General Secretary… Another exceptional project at the heart of Silesia th th August 17 , 2019 marks the 100 anniversary of the (in Polish – Śląsk), is the Silesian Museum in first of three Silesian Uprisings. In the years of 1919- Katowice. It’s the largest museum in the region, 1921, Upper Silesia which belonged to Germany situated on the grounds of former coal mine. It not before World War I, was contested by Germany and only features permanent exhibitions dedicated to Poland. Poles were disappointed that Upper Silesia the history of Upper Silesia, but also restored former had not been granted outright to newly mine buildings, underground halls and the independent Poland and rose against the Germans. observation tower, which is a former mine shaft, where visitors can enjoy the beautiful panorama of Katowice. The Silesian Museum has become an important cultural center and one of the most visited museums in Poland. Please visit https://muzeumslaskie.pl/en/ Source: wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Territorial_changes_of_Poland_1921.jpg The first two uprisings, in 1919 and 1920, were suppressed within a few days, but the third one in 1921, let to the inclusion of the southeastern part of Upper Silesia to Poland. The contribution of Poles in the uprisings impacted the shape of national borders after Poland’s rebirth. Source: www.wearemuseums.com Prepared by: Kasia Niemczyk General Secretary of Polish American Congress – Source: www.mpsl.pl Wisconsin Division The Silesian Uprisings Museum is the place that holds the original exhibits related to the history of the Silesian Uprisings.
[Show full text]